概念词典 · 技术

TPU 张量处理器

Google 自研的 AI 专用 ASIC,与 NVIDIA GPU 形成商业竞争,是博通 ASIC 业务的核心客户。

别名: TPU Tensor Processing Unit Google TPU 张量处理器

是什么

TPU (Tensor Processing Unit) 是 Google 从 2015 年开始研发的 AI 专用芯片。和 GPU 不同:

维度GPU (NVIDIA)TPU (Google)
通用性通用并行计算专为矩阵乘法优化
生态CUDA 几乎垄断仅 Google Cloud / Google 内部
物理实现Foundry:TSMC设计外包给 Broadcom (AVGO)
主要采购方所有人Google + Google Cloud 客户

最关键一点:TPU 实际由 Broadcom $AVGO 代设计,所以 TPU 的放量 = AVGO 的 ASIC 收入飙升。

为什么是产业链分析的关键变量

Google 是除 NVIDIA 之外唯一拥有完整自研 AI 加速器栈的玩家。如果 TPU 真的从内部走向外部商用化(已有迹象),三件事会发生:

  1. NVIDIA CUDA 护城河被打破第一道口子
  2. Broadcom 的 ASIC 业务从”Google 一个客户”扩张
  3. 上游光模块 / 光引擎 / HBM 厂商的客户结构改变

Serenity 的视角

他对 TPU 的判断框架是 “TPU 是否商用化决定 ASIC 时代何时来”

  • 短期 (2026):TPU v6 主要供 Google 内部使用,AVGO ASIC 收入主要靠 Google
  • 中期 (2027-2028):如果 TPU 大规模对外销售,整个 ASIC 板块定价权迁移
  • 长期:TPU 之外,Meta MTIA、Microsoft Maia、Amazon Trainium 都可能复制这条路径

代表标的覆盖:

  • $AVGO Broadcom:TPU 直接受益者
  • $MRVL Marvell:第二大 ASIC 设计代工
  • $LITE Lumentum:光模块端绑定 Google TPU 订单

提到此概念的推文 (116)

按时间倒序 · 滚到底自动加载更多

  1. 个股论点 $AMZN$GOOGL$LITE

    看好亚马逊在物理AI转型中的赢家地位及其对机器人产业链的催化作用。

    @heyfinlo 是的,$AMZN 看起来是物理 AI(Physical AI)转型中的明确赢家。我认为亚马逊生态系统……与其他谷歌/元宇宙生态系统相比,更可能成为机器人玩家的催化剂。我隐约看到这与 $GOOGL TPU 对 $LITE 等供应商产生的效应存在相似之处。

    英文原文

    @heyfinlo Yep, $AMZN looks like the clear winner in physical AI shift. I think the Amazon ecosystem... is probably going to the catalyst for robotics players compared to others in the Google/Meta ecosystems. I kinda see parallels to the $GOOGL TPU effect on suppliers like $LITE or https://t.co/2Upo1XRLSp

  2. 个股论点 $AMZN$CCXI$GOOGL$NVDA

    将Agility比作机器人界Anthropic,看好其巨头背书及企业级起点。

    只是一个随想,美国领先的人形机器人玩家让我联想到当前的大语言模型(LLM)动态:Agility ($CCXI) 感觉有点像机器人领域的 Anthropic。在 $AMZN 和 $NVDA 的大力支持下,并深度整合了 $GOOGL Deepmind(类似 TPU)。它从企业级应用起步。

    英文原文

    Just a random thought, leading US humanoid players strangely me of the current LLM dynamics: Agility ( $CCXI ) kinda feels like Anthropic for robotics. With $AMZN and $NVDA heavily backing it, ingrained with $GOOGL Deepmind (like TPUs). And it starts off with enterprise

  3. 供应链分析 $AXTI$GOOGL$IQE$LITE

    通过供应商关系映射推测AI芯片供应链瓶颈。

    不客气,关于 $IQE。 -> $LITE 是 $GOOGL 的已知供应商。 -> $IQE 是 $LITE 的已知供应商。 -> $AXTI 是 $IQE 的已知供应商。 Google TPU + 超大规模云服务商 ASIC 的物料清单(BOM) 极度保密。 但你可以通过关系映射大致推测,尽管没人会明说 $AXTI 或 $IQE 供货给...

    英文原文

    Ur welcome with $IQE

  4. 供应链分析 $NVDA$GOOGL$AMZN

    长期更偏好英伟达上游瓶颈而非NVDA本身。

    回复 @darkseidzz:嗯,长期看,相比做多 $NVDA,我更喜欢你所有的上游瓶颈环节,因为这些会被重估得最多(英伟达已经是世界最大公司)。 我很确定,超大云厂商 ASIC 最终会分流 $NVDA 的需求,比如 $GOOGL 的 TPU、$AMZN 的 Trainium 项目。

    英文原文

    @darkseidzz hmm, i prefer all your upstream chokepoints over $NVDA long term since those will be re-rated the most (nvidia already largest company in the world) pretty sure hyperscaler ASICs would eventually siphon off $NVDA demand like $GOOGL TPU, $AMZN trainium programs. wouldn't be too

  5. 供应链分析 $QCOM$AMZN$GOOGL

    讨论高通与字节/亚马逊相关机会及光子学收购。

    回复 @madridraptor:如果我没记错,$QCOM 是字节跳动,也可能是 $AMZN,不是 $GOOGL TPU。 不过我真的不喜欢高通对中国的敞口有多大。但他们做了一些非常重要的光子学收购,比如 Alphawave(类似 Marvell 收购 Celestial)……

    英文原文

    @madridraptor $QCOM was Bytedance and maybe $AMZN if i remember correctly, not $GOOGL TPU. I'm really not a fan of how much exposure Qualcomm has to China though. But they made some really important photonics acqusitions like Alphawave (similar to what marvell did with celestial)... for

  6. 供应链分析 $NBIS$META$MSFT$GOOGL$CIFR$WULF

    说明NBIS对应META/MSFT,谷歌通过Fluidstack与CIFR/WULF做机房交易。

    回复 @JonahK44:$NBIS 是 $META 和 $MSFT。 $GOOGL 通过 Fluidstack 做了很多交易,从 $CIFR 到 $WULF,获取更多托管机房。我猜是为了接入更多 TPU

    英文原文

    @JonahK44 $NBIS is $META and $MSFT. $GOOGL has done a lot of Fluidstack deals with $CIFR to $WULF for more Colo. my guess is to plug in a lot more of their TPUS

  7. 供应链分析 $SIVE$AMZN$META$MSFT$GOOGL

    Ayar与Wiwynn公告对SIVE CPO机架级部署潜力重大。

    Ayar 今天与 Wiwynn 的公告,对 $SIVE 在 CPO -> 机架级部署方面可能非常重要。 Wiwynn 的云客户包括 $AMZN、$META、$MSFT。 而且他们一直在谈 $GOOGL TPU 部署。 我认为,仅供参考架构来看,每个机架大约需要512+个 SuperNova 光源。 所以如果 $SIVE 是主要激光阵列供应商(我们预计如此,因为 Macom + Lumentum 已从 Ayar 网站移除)。 即使是中等规模的机架部署,也会对收入非常有意义。 这只是 $SIVE / Ayar / Wiwynn 当前机架级商业化潜力,还不会体现在收入财务中。

    英文原文

    Ayar’s announcement today with Wiwynn is potentially very material for $SIVE regarding CPO -> rack scale deployments. As Wiwynn cloud clients include $AMZN, $META, $MSFT. And they’ve been in talks for $GOOGL TPU deployments. I think just for some reference architectures it’s around 512+ supernova light sourc a rack. So if $SIVE is the primary laser array supplier (which we expect, given Macom + Lumentum was removed from Ayar’s site). Even modest rack deployments would be very meaningful for revenue. This is just rack scale commercialization potential right now from $SIVE / Ayar / Wiwynn, which won’t show up in revenue financials yet.

  8. AI 相关供应链全面拥堵

    最近新闻和瓶颈的 TLDR,全部都在起飞: 1. CPU 瓶颈 - $INTC CEO 说 AI 推理把 CPU 比例从 1:8 推到了 1:1。 CPU 起飞($AMD、Intel、$ARM)-> $AMAT / $TSM / $KLAC 等也跟着起飞。 2. PGME / PGMEA 短缺。DuPont、Shiny Chemical、Daxin、San Fu、$DOW 等都要起飞? 光刻胶瓶颈也起飞? 3. 微控制器潜在瓶颈 + 涨价(Arterytek / Arterychip)正在压缩 AI 产能。 MCU 公司可能也要起飞? 4. 总统本周援引了《国防生产法》,里面包括: - 变压器 - 输电组件 - 先进导体 - 电力电子 - 变电站 - 高压断路器 - 保护继电器、 电容组 - 电气硅钢 这些都被称为“严重短缺”。像 $AMSC、$PLPC、$POWL、$VICR、$ATKR、$HPS.A 之类的也要起飞。 5. $GOOGL 在扩容新的 TPU 服务器。谷歌把 AI 芯片拆成训练 TPU 和推理 TPU。 台湾很开心。联发科等也要起飞? 6. 三星、Kingston 把 SSD 价格上调了 10% 以上。 SSD 价格还会继续起飞? 7. T-玻璃玻纤短缺还在恶化?Nittobo 等也继续起飞? 8. 用于蚀刻电路和阻燃的关键材料溴,价格已经涨到每公吨 12,000 美元。 以色列的 ICL Group 似乎掌控了全球 40% 的供应? 我对这个不算特别熟,但也有点可疑的起飞? 9. “外延厂 Landmark Optoelectronics 报告称产量仍远低于客户需求”。 嗯 $IQE 和其他公司也要起飞? 10. “AI 数据中心碰到互连限制,正在推高光模块需求”。“瓶颈不再只是算力,而是算力如何连接。” 来自 $AAOI、$LITE、$COHR、Innolight 等的光子链条继续起飞?下一代来自 $SIVE、$POET、$MRVL、Win Semi 等也起飞? 基本上就是 AI 半导体供应链全面起飞,因为 AI 超大规模云厂商需求带来了到处都是的短缺。

    英文原文

    TLDR of recent news + bottlenecks that go brr: 1. CPU bottleneck - $INTC CEO said AI inference pushed CPU Ratio From 1:8 to 1:1. CPUs go brr ( $AMD, Intel, $ARM) -> $AMAT / $TSM / $KLAC, etc. go brr. 2. PGME / PGMEA shortage. DuPont, Shiny Chemical, Daxin, San Fu, $DOW and others go brr? Photoresist bottleneck go brr? 3. Microcontroller potential bottleneck + price hikes (Arterytek/Arterychip) was weighing price hikes on AI capacity squeezes. MCU companies potentially go brr? 4. President invoked the "Defense Production Act" this week, it included: -Transformers - transmission components - advanced conductors - power electronics - substations - high-voltage circuit breakers - protective relays, capacitor banks - electrical core steel As "severe shortages". Stuff like $AMSC, $PLPC, $POWL, $VICR, $ATKR, $HPS.A go brr. 5. $GOOGL ramps new TPU servers. Google splits AI chips into training and inference TPUs. Taiwan happy. Mediatek and others go brr? 6. Samsung, Kingston lift SSD prices by over 10%. SSD prices keep going brrr? 7. T-glass fiberglass shortages keep getting worse? Nittobo and others keep going brrr? 8. Bromine, essential for etching circuits and flame retardancy, has surged to $12,000 per metric ton. ICL Group in Israel apparently controls 40% of the global supply? Not as familiar with this but questionable brrr? 9. "Epitaxy manufacturer LandMark Optoelectronics reporting output still far below customer needs". Uhh $IQE and others go brr? 10. "AI data centers hit interconnect limits, boosting optical module demand". "the bottleneck is no longer computing power alone, but how that power is connected." Photonics from $AAOI, $LITE, $COHR, Innolight and others keep going brr? next gen from $SIVE, $POET, $MRVL, Win Semi and others go brr? Basically AI semi supply chains go brr because there's widespread shortages everywhere due to AI hyperscaler demand.

  9. 个股论点 $AMZN$LITE$MSFT$SIVE

    SIVE 下一站像 LITE

    谢谢,我之前确实说过 $SIVE 看起来像下一个 $LITE! 去年我因为 Google TPU 看好 Lumentum,而市场通常会更喜欢 Google 生态而不是 Amazon 生态。 但如果 Apple 在 CPO 上放量,市场会重新认识这整条线。

    英文原文

    Thanks, I did say $SIVE looked like the next $LITE! I went long on Lumentum last year because of the Google TPU and markets tend to like Google's ecosystem a bit more than $AMZN or $MSFT. Of course, a lot can happen in the next 2 years so this is speculative but likely supply chain mapping, we'll find out what happens.

  10. 供应链分析 $GOOGL$MRVL$POET$SIVE

    Marvell与Google洽谈TPU开发,Sivers有望成为光子光源供应商

    $MRVL正在洽谈为$GOOGL开发TPU(张量处理单元),涵盖两种不同的芯片型号。 如果谈判顺利,$SIVE很可能成为Google供应链的光源供应商。 尤其因为其定制ASIC(专用集成电路)可能推动Celestial IP在MPU(微处理器单元)架构中实现规模扩展(光子结构,Photonic Fabric)。这与$POET和Sivers两家公司的布局都相吻合。 定制ASIC需要数年时间,因此来自Google的实质性营收可能要等到2028年下半年。 供应商可能采用多元采购策略,但拥有Google作为潜在终端客户是一个超越2028年的结构性多年催化剂。 市场通常具有前瞻性。

    英文原文

    $MRVL in talks to develop $GOOGL TPU for two different chip models. High possibility $SIVE likely became the light source for Google's supply chains if talks go well. Especially as their custom ASIC likely pushes Celestial IP for scale up (Photonic Fabric) in the MPU's architecture. And this maps to both $POET and Sivers. Custom ASICs take years, so there's probably no material revenue from Google until H2 2028. Vendors are also probably multi-sourced, but having Google as a likely end user is a structural multi-year catalyst past 2028. Markets are typically forward looking.

  11. 认为 Enplas 的双瓶颈与客户结构很有意思。

    Enplas(6961)在大约 9.85 亿美元市值时看起来挺有意思。 它们握着两个瓶颈: 1. MLA(微透镜阵列)的主导供应商。比如 SiPH switch、1.6T、3.2T 光子产品。 2. IC 测试 socket 的寡头供应商(AI 芯片测试) 手头现金大约 1.55 亿美元,没有债务。股东权益/资产比大约 89%(一般 50%+ 就算稳),所以我觉得下行风险很低。 而且它们推测的客户是: 1. 光子(MLA):高度可能是 Innolight、Eoptolink、Furukawa、Intel(SiPh)。大概率还有 $COHR、$LITE。 2. GPU/ASIC(测试 socket):大概率是 $TSM、ASE,以及这些类型用来测试 $NVDA GPU、$GOOGL TPU(Google Ironwood 很可能就是这个方向)。 “为主要 GPU 制造商以及 hyperscaler 的 ASIC 相关项目扩大量产订单。” 然后在 OFC: OFC: “我们将展示支持当今 AI 快速技术进步的 800Gbps 和 1.6Tbps 收发器以及 CPO(共封装光学)的新产品。” 本质上你得到的是一家同时服务一线半导体、晶圆厂和 hyperscaler 的公司,并且它能同时受益于 MLA 光子段带来的 1.6T,以及之后 OFC 产品带来的 CPO TAM 扩张。 这是我想分享的一笔持仓,因为它在不到 10 亿美元市值时就显得挺酷。

    英文原文

    Enplas (6961) at ~$985M seems kinda interesting. 
They hold two chokepoints: 1. Dominant supplier for MLAs (micro lens arrays). Eg. SiPH switches, 1.6T, 3.2T for photonics. 
 2. Oligopoly supplier for IC Test sockets (AI Chip Testing) Cash on hand: ~$155M, no debt. Equity-to-Asset Ratio: ~89% (50%+ usually is solid), so low downside risk imo. 
And their speculated customers: 1, Photonics (MLAs): Highly probable: Innolight, Eoptolink, Furukawa, Intel (SiPh). And prob $COHR, $LITE. 2. GPU/ASICs (Test Sockets): prob $TSM, ASE, types use these to likely test $NVDA GPUs, $GOOGL TPUs (Google Ironwood is highly probable). "expanding mass production orders for major GPU manufacturers, and for ASIC-related projects for hyperscalers."
 Then at OFC: OFC: “We will be showcasing our new products for 800Gbps and 1.6Tbps transceivers and CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) that support today’s rapid technological advancements in AI.” Basically you have a company that supplies T1 semis, foundries, hyperscalers, that benefits from 1.6T from MLA photonics segment + CPO TAM expansion later from OFC products. Was one my positions wanted to share my thoughts about since it seemed p cool at sub <$1B MC.

  12. 供应链分析 $AAOI$AMZN$LITE$MRVL

    亚马逊因Anthropic模型基于Trainium训练消息反弹,带动MRVL、AAOI等相关股

    顺便解释一下你们可能想知道的$AMZN今天为何反弹:新消息显示Anthropic的Mythos及其最新模型很可能是基于Amazon Trainium训练的。这对亚马逊生态系统来说意义重大,从$MRVL到$AAOI都受益于Anthropic。就像今年早些时候谷歌TPU生态因Gemini而反弹,包括$LITE一样。

    英文原文

    Just in case you’re wondering why $AMZN rallied today: New news that Anthropic Mythos and their latest models were likely trained on Amazon Trainium. This is big for Amazon’s ecosystem from $MRVL to $AAOI due to Anthropic. Just like how Google’s TPU ecosystem rallied earlier this year like $LITE from Gemini.

  13. 博主列出30只看好的美股并简述理由,涵盖AI半导体、太空、机器人、加密等领域

    今天随机列出30只美国可投资的股票以及我喜欢它们的理由: 1. $INTC——美国晶圆代工的希望,国家安全 2. $MRVL——未来的maia芯片和CPO等附加产品推动营收规模化,业务范围太多数不过来 3. $TSM——半导体/AI的支柱 4. $COHR——业务全垂直整合 + 捕获光学周期 5. $RKLB——太空领域的终极前沿,5年后和20年后都会存在 6. $DRAM——三星/SK海力士的内存敞口 7. $AVGO——超大规模云商不喜欢英伟达GPU税 8. $AMZN——没人能竞争得过隔夜送达卫生纸这件事。机器人技术会长期降低运营费用 9. $ARM——AGI CPU在未来十年会大幅提升营收 10. $TSEM——做光相关的东西你需要晶圆代工 11. $IBIT——比特币,这点我们现在已经众所周知了 12. $NBIS——我认为它是下一个AWS。此外它们还与优步合作做自动驾驶,拥有可扩展的数据库公司、数据标注业务。几乎像一个小谷歌。 13. $GOOGL——youtube不会消失,gemini很棒。它们通过TPU实现垂直整合,用运营收入资助基础设施建设,所以我看好它。 14. $AMKR——超级工厂将在2027-2028年末投产。受益于美国制造政策 15. $HOOD——短期我不喜欢,但长期我看好罗宾汉,因为他们抓住了散户 + 有更多产品如银行等正在规模化。产品创新很疯狂。 16. $CRCL——我恰好非常喜欢稳定币,并认为它们是支付和持有的未来(取决于澄清法案的进展) 17. $META——人们不会很快停止使用Instagram、Whatsapp或其他应用。 18. $LITE——$GOOGL TPU敞口在BOM中占比较高。只要谷歌的AI计划持续运行,我认为$LITE会表现良好。 19. $LPTH——锗和中国出口管制问题将持续存在,因此美国制造的工程替代品将始终重要。 20. $FN——总得有人来组装光学产品 21. $JBL——同上,但加上英特尔硅光业务的IP,可能会成为innolight那样的公司 22. $MP——美国稀土项目极其重要,类似于$INTC涉及的国家安全风险 23. $HIMS——听我说,他们刚收购了一堆公司,股价在$19时有全球DTC渠道。做空者非常讨厌这家公司,但我认为作为逆向多头它实际上很有前景。 24. $SMTC——LRO/LPO转型 25. $POWL——美国版hammond,用于开关设备DC类瓶颈的替代方案 26. $VPG——人形机器人未来会成为主流,大概2027-2028年,这家公司做传感器。 27. $MOG.A——感觉在机器人领域、spacex供应链里到处都能看到它们 28. $MSFT——在$375这个价位,有一天我们会回头看发现这是买入机会。 29. $CVX——战争结束后油价可能会崩,但这些石油公司将变得极其重要,尤其是委内瑞拉还是个金矿。 30. $XLU——我认为降息可能会重启,我们需要电力/电网来支持AI,所以从$CEG到$NEE这些名字将始终重要。 只是顺便抛出一些除了$AAOI和$AEHR之外的想法。

    英文原文

    Here's a bunch of random 30 US-available random stocks I like today and why: 1. $INTC - America's hope for foundry, national security 2. $MRVL - scales rev from future maia asics and add ons like cpo, they do everything lost count 3. $TSM - backbone of semis/ai 4. $COHR - They do everything vertically integrated + captures optical cycle 5. $RKLB - the final frontier of space will be around 5 years from now and 20 years from now. 6. $DRAM - memory exposure for samsung/sk hynix 7. $AVGO - hyperscalers dont like nvidia gpu tax 8. $AMZN - nobody can compete against the overnight shipping of toilet paper. robotics will lower opex over time 9. $ARM - AGI CPUs scale revenue quite a bit over the next decade 10. $TSEM - you're going to need a foundry for light based stuff 11. $IBIT - bitcoin, we all know by now 12. $NBIS - i think it's the next AWS. Also they do self-driving cars with uber, own scaling DB companies, data labeling. It's almost like a mini Google. 13. $GOOGL - youtube is not going away, gemini is great. they're vertically integrated with TPUs and fund buildout with operating income so i like it. 14. $AMKR - super facilities coming online in late 2027-2028. benefits from made in america 15. $HOOD - i dont like short term, but long term i'm a fan of Robinhood since they captured retail + have more products like banking, etc that they're scaling up. product innovation is wild. 16. $CRCL - I happen to really like stablecoins and see them as the future for both payments/holding (depends on clarity act) 17. $META - people aren't going to stop using instagram or whatsapp, or others anytime soon. 18. $LITE - $GOOGL TPU exposure decently high part of BOM. As long as Google's AI program keeps running I think $LITE will do well. 19. $LPTH - Germanium and China export controls will always be an issue so US made engineered alternatives will always be important 20. $FN - Someone needs to assemble optical stuff 21. $JBL - same as above, but added with ip from Intel's SiPh acqusition so might end up like innolight? 22. $MP - American rare earths program is extremely important, similar to $INTC national security risks 23. $HIMS - Okay here me out they just acquired a ton of companies, and at $19 they have global DTC channel. short sellers really hate this company, but I think it's actually promising as a contrarian long 24. $SMTC - LRO/LPO transition 25. $POWL - US alternative to hammond for switchgear DC type bottleneck 26. $VPG - Humanoids will be a thing down the road maybe 2027-2028, this makes the sensors. 27. $MOG.A - Feels like i see them everywhere in robotics, to spacex supply chains 28. $MSFT - At $375, one day we'll look back and see this as a buying opportunity. 29. $CVX - oil might crash after war but these oil companies are going to be extremely important, especially when Venezulea is a goldmine. 30. $XLU - i think rate cuts might be back online, we need power/grid for AI so these names will always be improtant from $CEG to $NEE Just throwing out other thoughts aside from $AAOI and $AEHR.

  14. 认为 AEHR 在小市值下被低估,正被多家超大客户做资格认证。

    $AEHR 在大约 11 亿美元市值下看起来极有吸引力。 Aehr 开始让我想起早期的 $TER,又有点像财报前的 $AAOI。 如果把时间线和猜测客户列出来: 2 月 11 日:Sonoma 为超大客户的 AI ASIC 处理器拿到生产胜利。(大概率是 $GOOGL、$AMZN、$META) - 可能是谷歌?Aehr 收购了 Incal,而 Incal 曾被猜测会被谷歌用于 TPU。 2 月 26 日:来自 AI 主力客户的 1400 万美元。(大概率是 $AMD、$NVDA) - 这里更像是 $AMD,用于 Instinct MI300/MI400。 3 月 3 日:一台 FOX-XP 系统对应的主硅光客户。(大概率是 $INTC siph) - 很可能 $INTC 就是他们的主客户。 3 月 31 日:来自一家新的大型硅光客户的首单。(大概率是 $AVGO、$MRVL、$CSCO) - 新客户(排除了 Intel),大概是这些正转向 800G/1.6T 硅光收发器的公司之一。 (这些都属于非常保密的 BOM 级推测) 不管怎样,这条时间线对 $AEHR 来说就是在不断加码。 也许就是下一次财报。也可能再过两季。 但感觉量产订单只是时间问题。

    英文原文

    $AEHR looks extremely promising at ~$1.1B MC. Aehr is starting to remind me of an early $TER, mixed with pre-earnings $AAOI. If we look at the timeline and speculated customers: Feb 11th: Sonoma production win for Hyperscaler's AI ASIC processors. (likely $GOOGL, $AMZN, $META). - Probably Google? Aehr bought Incal, who was speculated to be used by Google for their TPUs. Feb 26th: $14 million from AI lead customer (likely $AMD, $NVDA) - Probably $AMD here for Instinct MI300/MI400. March 3rd: Lead silicon photonics customer for one FOX-XP system (likely $INTC siph) - Very likely $INTC has been their lead customer. March 31st: Initial order from major new silicon photonics customer (likely $AVGO, $MRVL, $CSCO ) - New customer (rules out Intel), prob one of these transitioning to 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers (All speculative, very confidential BOM) Regardless. This timeline is just bottling up for $AEHR. Could be next earnings. Or two quarters from now. But feels like a matter of time before we see mass orders.

  15. 分享小账户分散化投资组合,涵盖AI半导体、光子学机器人、加密等领域的高增长和杠铃策略标的

    快速增长赛道: $AAOI - 光收发器2027年下半年收入增长10倍 $NBIS - 2026年第四季度收入增长10倍 $ARM - 全新AI CPU带来5倍收入增长 $MRVL - 来自$MSFT Maia芯片项目2-3倍收入增长 $AVGO - 长期持有超大规模云厂商ASIC $LITE - 长期持有OCS/谷歌TPU Win Semi - 对前沿行业的代工敞口 $TSEM - 长期持有光子业务,订单积压 SK Hynix - 存储业务敞口,极端营业利润增长 同时配置一些杠铃策略,远离超大规模云厂商资本支出(除亚马逊外): $VNP - 长期持有西部供应链的稀土 $NEO (TCX) - 机器人供应链 $AMZN - 机器人/AI降低运营成本 $CRCL - 稳定币多头 $RDDT - 高得离谱的利润 $GLD - 安全对冲 $IBIT - 2028年减半 $CVX 看涨期权 - 石油对冲 也许还有长期配置(你知道迟早会来): $INTC/$AMKR - 美国制造供应链 $SOI - 硅光子学/共封装光学(CPO)基板 $RKLB - 对太空行业的长期看涨期权 然后挑选一两支小盘股博暴涨: $SIVE - CW激光关键点或$I QE - Landmark重组重估,这是我最喜欢的两个 还有其他我提过的,比如$AEHR用于测试或$VPG用于Optimus 我自己在$AXTI等股票上的主动管理模式与其他人应该做的完全不同风险敞口配置。 在这种宏观环境下全仓投入高贝塔标的不太是最佳选择。

    英文原文

    Faster compounds: $AAOI - 10x revenue ramp from optical transcivers h2 2027 $NBIS - 10x revenue ramp Q4 2026 $ARM - 5x revenue growth from their new AI CPU $MRVL - 2-3x revenue growth from $MSFT Maia Ramp. $AVGO - Long hyperscaler ASIC $LITE - Long OCS / Google TPU Win Semi - Foundry exposure to frontier industries $TSEM - Long photonics, backlogged SK Hynix - Memory exposure, extreme operating income ramp With some barbell exposure away from Hyperscaler capex aside from Amazon: $VNP - Long term rare earths for Western Supply chains $NEO (TCX) - Robotics Supply chains $AMZN - Robotics/AI cutting opex $CRCL - Stablecoin long $RDDT - Ridiculously high profit $GLD - Safe Hedge $IBIT - Halving 2028 $CVX Calls - Oil Hedge And maybe long term (you know it's coming): $INTC / $AMKR- Made in America supply chains $SOI - Silicon Photonics / CPO substrates. $RKLB - Long term call on Space industry Then pick one or two small cap moonshots: $SIVE - CW Laser Chokepoints or $IQE for Landmark rerating on restructuring were my two favorites. There's others I've mentioned like $AEHR for testing or $VPG for Optimus. How I actively manage my own stuff from $AXTI and others is a lot different risk profile than what others should do. Going full port into high-beta in this macro environment is not the best idea.

  16. 供应链分析 $P4O$TDY$LITE$GOOGL$GLW

    详细映射 P4O 可能成为 LITE 上游玻璃供应商,但强调未必能显著转化为收入。

    我刚看了评论…… $P4O 看起来像是一个潜在的 $LITE 上游供应商,市值只有 3400 万美元。 它大致的映射可能是: -> Plan Optik $P4O(玻璃晶圆) -> Teledyne $TDY 或 Silek(存储晶圆厂) -> $LITE(OCS 交换机) -> $GOOGL(TPU) 不过,$LITE 这个层面上的玻璃晶圆供应,可能也会和 Corning($GLW)双源采购。 P4O 是 Infineon、Samsung 等公司的已知供应商,所以也不是随便的一家公司。 €335 万现金 vs. 3552 万美元市值,资产负债表还挺健康。 但这不代表它一定会带来显著收入提升,除非他们开始提价(因为玻璃晶圆大概只占 $LITE OCS BOM 的很小一部分)。 我个人在读完这些之后是持有了一些股份。 因为 $LITE OCS 潜在供应链瓶颈在战略上很有价值,也许财务上没那么明显。 但它关于 Plan Optik 的玻璃流和 MDF finishing 在 OCS 封装里几乎不可替代这一点,我觉得是成立的。 当然,超大规模云供应链保护得很严,所以也不可能 100% 确定。 这些功劳都属于跟帖的粉丝们。 但 TLDR: 供应链映射 -> $P4O -> 晶圆厂 -> $LITE -> $GOOGL,按他们的分析是很可能的。 至于它是不是 $LITE OCS 供应链里的瓶颈……我不确定它到底能不能显著转化成财务价值。 再说一遍,我完全不是在推荐它。 只是觉得这种 $LITE OCS 供应链映射很有意思,把粉丝辛辛苦苦做的研究丢到空白里也太浪费了。

    英文原文

    So just checked out the comments... $P4O does look like a potential upstream $LITE supplier at a $34M MC. How it likely maps: -> Plan Optik $P4O (Glass Wafers) -> Teledyne $TDY or Silek (Mem Foundries) -> $LITE (OCS Switches) -> $GOOGL (TPUs) However, $LITE likely dual sources with Corning ( $GLW ) on the glass wafer level. P4O is a known supplier to Infineon, Samsung, and others, so not exactly a random company. €3.35 million vs. 35.52M MC is very healthy balance sheet. That being said: -> That doesn't exactly mean this translates to material revenue boosts unless they start price hike (given glass wafers are likely a very small part of $LITE OCS BOM). I do personally own shares, after reading this. Since $LITE OCS potential supply chain chokepoints is strategically valuable. Maybe not so much so as financially valuable. But their core thesis that Plan Optik's Glass Flow and MDF finishing are effectively irreplaceable for OCS packaging checks out. Of course, hyperscaler supply chains are heavily guarded, so no way to know 100%. All credit goes to follower comments. But TLDR: Supply Chain Mapping -> $P4O -> Foundries -> $LITE -> $GOOGL is very likely from their analysis. As for being a chokepoint in $LITE OCS supply chain... dunno if it translates materially. Again, not recommending this at all. Just thought the $LITE OCS supply chain mapping like this very interesting, and that it would be a waste of the follower kinda posted all this work into the void.

  17. Sivers涨幅29%达2.82亿市值,作者认为其作为CPO/硅光子学上游激光供应商,是下一个LITE,尚未被市场定价。

    Sivers今天又涨了29%,市值达到2.82亿美元。我真心认为$SIVE可能是下一个$LITE。因为他们被定位为下一代超大规模算力供应链接构的光源。当scale up-scale out架构转向共封装光学(CPO)和硅光子学(Silicon Photonics)时——光子学超级周期(Photonics Supercycle)的开端。那些从$POET和Ayar购买并封装其激光阵列/cw DFB激光(连续波分布反馈激光器)的公司——估值约10亿至40亿美元以上(不包括O-Net或未披露的公司)。在当前可插拔光收发器(Pluggable Transceiver)周期中:激光供应商通常比其购买光源的封装对手方获得更高的估值溢价。所以,我确实认为$SIVE在很大程度上被市场忽视,远未反映在股价中。(该推文引用了@aleabitoreddit的推文,仅供理解语境):$SIVE是CPO和硅光子学的上游激光供应商。他们是未来类似$COHR/$LITE的光源供应商,可能用于:- $AMZN Trainium集群- $MSFT Maia集群以及可能的其他超大规模算力商如$META MTAI和$GOOGL TPU集群。目前市值约2亿美元。关联映射(推测性):$SIVE(光源)-> $POET(光学中介层)-> $MRVL(可能是Celestial内部供应)-> $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium。$SIVE(光源)-> Ayar -> AiChip -> $AMZN Inferentia/Trainium。$SIVE(光源)-> Enablence -> O-Net -> ?亚洲超大规模算力商。持续进行中:$SIVE(光源)-> Ayar -> GUC -> ?(Google $TPU)。$SIVE(光源)-> Ayar(TeraPHY/SuperNova)-> Wiwynn(内部CPO)-> ?($MSFT, $META历史上Wiwynn最大的客户)。由于类似$MRVL Celestial这样的内部供应模式,他们获得了免费搭乘。然而,他们确实在商业模式下与Lumentum、Coherent和$MTSI多源自ELS竞争,并与Ayar一起获胜。但无论哪种方式他们都能赢。对于大规模生产爬坡,其中很大一部分取决于正在进行的Win半导体验证,但这可能是一个重要指标。再强调一下,供应链BOM(物料清单)是极其机密的。$AMZN永远不会告诉任何人"嘿,我们用$SIVE"。但如果你把1+1+1+1+1放在一起,你可以拼凑出可能的供应商。大多数人看到"Poet Starlight"使用$SIVE,或Ayar使用$SIVE。但没有映射所有多跳关系来看它们最终去向哪里。我确实认为$SIVE是一个非常未被发现的机遇,作为未来硅光子学领域可能的迷你版$LITE,当时市值2亿美元。作为未来CPO/硅光子学规模扩展的上游激光供应商,用于cw DFB激光器和激光阵列的超大规模算力供应链接构。

    英文原文

    Sivers is up another 29% to a $282M marketcap today. I genuinely think $SIVE could be the next $LITE. As they’re positioned as the light source for the next generation of hyperscaler supply chains. When scale up-scale out architectures transition to CPO & Silicon photonics. For the start of next Photonics Supercycle. The companies that buy and package their laser arrays/cw dfb lasers from $POET to Ayar? Are worth ~$1B-$4B+ (not including o-net or undisclosed). With current pluggable transceiver cycles: Laser suppliers typically command higher valuation premiums than their packaging counterparties that buy the light source. So, I do think $SIVE is largely undiscovered by markets and far from being priced in.

  18. $SIVE作为2亿美元市值的硅光子学上游激光供应商,是未被发现的机遇,供应超大规模业者CPO供应链。

    $SIVE是CPO硅光子学的上游激光供应商。 他们是未来可能像$COHR和$LITE那样的光源供应商,用于: - $AMZN Trainium集群 - $MSFT Maia集群 以及可能还有其他超大规模业者的$META MTAI和$GOOGL TPU集群。 市值约2亿美元。 关系映射(推测性): $SIVE(光源)-> $POET(光学中介层)-> $MRVL(可能是Celestial专用)-> $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium $SIVE(光源)-> Ayar -> AiChip -> $AMZN Inferentia/Trainium $SIVE(光源)-> Enablence -> O-Net -> ? 亚洲超大规模业者 正在进行中: $SIVE(光源)-> Ayar -> GUC -> ?(Google $TPU) $SIVE(光源)-> Ayar(TeraPHY/SuperNova)-> Wiwynn(专用CPO)-> ?($MSFT、$META历史上是Wiwynn最大的客户)。 由于$MRVL Celestial等专用模式的存在,他们可以免费搭便车。 然而,他们在与Lumentum、Coherent和$MTSI的多源ELS竞争中对抗Ayar并获胜,即使在商业模式下也是如此。 但无论哪种模式他们都能获胜。 对于大规模生产爬坡,其中很大一部分取决于正在进行中的Win半导体认证,但这可能是一个重要指标。 同样,供应链BOM(物料清单)极度保密。$AMZN永远不会告诉任何人"嘿,我们使用$SIVE"。 但如果你把1+1+1+1+1加起来,你可以拼凑出可能的供应商。 大多数人都知道"Poet Starlight"使用$SIVE。或者Ayar使用$SIVE。但没有将所有多跳关系映射到最终目的地。 我真的认为$SIVE是一个极未被发现的机遇,可能成为下一个小型$LITE,用于硅光子学,在2亿美元市值下。 因为他们是未来CPO/硅光子学规模化扩展中超大规模业者供应链的上游激光供应商,cw DFB激光器和激光阵列用于扩展。

    英文原文

    $SIVE is the upstream laser supplier for CPO and Silicon Photonics. They're the likely $COHR / $LITE type future light source for: - $AMZN Trainium Clusters - $MSFT Maia Clusters and possibly other hyperscalers like $META MTAI and $GOOGL TPU clusters. At a ~$200M MC. Relational Mapping (speculative): $SIVE (light source) -> $POET (optical interposers) -> $MRVL (Likely Celestial Captive) -> $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium. $SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> AiChip -> $AMZN Inferentia/Trainium $SIVE (light source) -> Enablence -> O-Net -> ? Asia Hyperscalers _ Ongoing: $SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> GUC -> ? (Google $TPU) $SIVE (light source) -> Ayar (TeraPHY/SuperNova)-> Wiwynn (captive CPO) -> ? ( $MSFT, $META historically Wiwynn's largest clients). Because of captive models like $MRVL Celestial, they get a free ride. However, they do compete multi-source ELS against Lumentum, Coherent, and $MTSI with Ayar and win anyway in merchant models. But they win either way. For high-volume production ramp up, a large part of it depends on the ongoing Win semi qualification, but this will likely be a large indicator. Again supply chain BOM is extremely confidential. $AMZN will never tell anyone "Hey, we use $SIVE ". But if you put 1+1+1+1+1 together, you can piece together the likely suppliers. Most people see "Poet Starlight" uses $SIVE. Or Ayar uses $SIVE. But don't map all the multi-hop relations to see where they end up. I do think $SIVE is an extremely undiscovered opportunity as the next possible mini $LITE for Silicon Photonics at $200m MC. As they're the likely upstream laser supplier for hyperscaler supply chains for future CPO/Silicon Photonics scale up with cw dfb lasers and scale out with laser arrays.

  19. $SIVE牵手O-Net/Enablence布局CPO,标志硅光子CW DFB激光器供应链成型,替代EML瓶颈的新周期将至。

    刚刚:$SIVE宣布与O-Net和Enablence达成CPO(共封装光学)重大合作。 Sivers将成为CPO的激光阵列供应商。 这实质上是论点验证,因为$SIVE成为InP CW DFB(连续波分布式反馈)激光器供应商,用于硅光子学。 简单来说,这就是当前光学瓶颈的$LITE -> $FN关系。 并且类似于现有的$POET -> $MRVL Celestial CPO供应链,但位于亚洲。 Enablence生产"星形耦合器",类似于$POET的插入器。 O-Net是一家大型组装商,将它们封装成成品模块。 香港的O-Net是华为、中兴通讯、Ciena、Nokia、 Fujitsu等公司的供应商。 (引用内容): $SIVE今天已上涨+73.78%(市值2.31亿美元)。 随着市场对未来潜在$LITE光子学公司的信息进行综合定价。 如果我必须解释区别: Lumentum的一个激光源主要受益于当前的光学瓶颈。 而$SIVE的激光源则针对即将到来的CPO/硅光子瓶颈。 Lumentum目前主要从$NVDA和超大规模云服务商确保EML(电吸收调制激光器)产能中获益,用于当前可插拔光学收发器周期。 从当前EML瓶颈可以看出,超大规模云服务商正在抢购任何800G/1.6T收发器及上游产能,来自: - $AAOI(内部供应) - $COHR、$LITE(EML激光器+设计)-> $FN(组装) - $COHR、$LITE(EML激光器)-> Innolight / Eoptolink 下一步是什么? 硅光子学和共封装光学。 向CPO的架构转变需要大规模的高功率CW DFB激光器阵列。 这可能会触发需求量的突然全面范式转变。 $SIVE从InP CW DFB激光器中获益,用于SiPh(硅光子学)和CPO: 即将崛起的公司如: $AYAR、$POET采购$SIVE的激光器,但主要做先进封装。 然后它们向上输给更大的公司,如$MRVL Celestial(购买$POET的插入器)。 然而,如果你往上游追溯,光源实际上是$SIVE。 CW DFB激光器是光源引擎($SIVE);硅光子学封装($POET等)是传输方式。 CPO规模尚未到来,但我们知道它即将到来。 正如当前光学收发器周期所示: - $LITE和$COHR的光源公司获得的估值远高于专注于先进封装的$FN等公司。 市场一直在关注$POET,但忽略了它们Starlight项目实际光源(类似$LITE类型)的来源。 风险存在,包括面临$LITE、$COHR、$AVGO等多方竞争。所以再次强调,请务必自己做研究。 但我对此的反论点: Sivers足够早地根据$POET、Ayar和其他公司的规格定制激光器,在它们声名鹊起之前(类似于$POET到$MRVL Celestial的类比)。 也存在产量风险: 但Win Semi(稳懋)认证的潜在赢面可以抵消这一点。 稀释风险以扩大产能,对于每个早期阶段的公司来说始终存在。 去年我做了$LITE的论点研究,并且仍然看好这只股票用于Google TPU增长/OCS(光学电路交换)。 但今年,我的重点是: $SIVE,作为我个人对新一轮光子学架构转变的CW DFB激光器敞口。 我分享自己对把握从当前EML周期轮动到即将到来的CW DFB/硅光子周期的个人观点。

    英文原文

    Just in: $SIVE announces major partnership with O-Net and Enablence for CPO. Sivers will be the laser array supplier for CPO. This is thesis validation in effect as $SIVE becomes InP CW DFB supplier for silicon photonics. In simpler terms, this is the $LITE -> $FN relationship for current optical bottlenecks. And mirrors the existing $POET -> $MRVL Celestial CPO supply chain, but in Asia. Enablence makes the "Star Coupler", similar to $POET interposers. O-Net is a massive assembler, that packages them for the finished module. O-Net in HK is a supplier to companies like Huawei, ZTE, Ciena, Nokia, Fujitsu, and more.

  20. Sivers作为CW DFB激光器上游供应商,受益于向CPO/硅光子学的架构转换,与当前EML周期的Lumentum形成技术路线对比。

    通常我不会回复喷子,但这个平台的虚伪确实令人印象深刻。 随机X平台散户: “为什么$Lite涨了1000%你之前不告诉我?” 我: “我在最早期就发布了这个可能的$Lite的论点,而且没有付费墙。” X平台散户: 😡,“我打算花$400付费墙来做多$ADBE并做空$PLTR”。 尤其是在我的$AXTI论点已经从$12涨到$50三个月后…… 我免费分享我所有的思考过程。 市场可以立即或以任何方式定价任何阿尔法。(我也会出错,尤其是像$ETOR这样从$65跌到$33的股票)。 然而,不是原来的模式——分析师以$2000+的价格向其他对冲基金出售论点,让他们慢慢建仓。 然后散户在$400亿+的估值买入,正如$Lite所呈现的那样。 我的账号之所以增长,是因为我是少数打破这种模式的分析师之一。我向所有人免费分发新颖的信息综合。 股票是正和游戏,如果论点方向正确,每个人都会受益。 (引用推文内容: $SIVE今天上涨+73.78%(市值$2.31亿)。 市场正在定价关于下一个潜在$Lite光子学的信息综合。 如果我必须解释区别: Lumentum的一个激光源主要从当前光学瓶颈中受益。 $SIVE的另一个激光源则是为即将到来的CPO/硅光子学瓶颈准备的。 Lumentum目前主要从$Nvidia和超大规模云服务商确保EML激光器产能中获益,用于当前可插拔光学收发器周期。 从当前EML瓶颈可以看出,超大规模云服务商正在购买任何800G/1.6T收发器及以下上游产能: - $AAOI(内部供应) - $COHR、$LITE(EML激光器+设计)-> $FN(组装) - $COHR、$LITE(EML激光器)-> Innolight / Eoptolink 接下来是什么? 硅光子学和共封装光学。 向CPO的架构转换需要大量高功率CW DFB激光器阵列。 而这可能会引发容量需求的突然范式转变。 $SIVE受益于InP CW DFB激光器用于SiPh和CPO: 即将崛起的公司如: $AYAR、$POET采购$SIVE的激光器,但主要做先进封装。 然后它们向上输给更大的公司如$MRVL Celestial(采购$POET的中介层)。 然而,如果你往上游追溯,光源是$SIVE。 CW DFB激光器是光源引擎($SIVE);硅光子学封装($POET等)是传输方式。 CPO规模尚未到来。但我们知道它正在逼近。 正如当前光学收发器周期所见: - $LITE和$COHR的光源比专注先进封装的$FN等公司获得更高的估值。 市场一直关注$POET,但错过了它们获得类似$SIVE类型光源的地方。 风险是存在的,包括面临$Lite、$COHR、$AVGO等多源竞争。所以,再强调一次,请自己做研究。 但我反对这种观点的理由是: Sivers足够早地为$POET、Ayar和其他公司定制激光器以满足规格要求,在它们成名之前(有点像$POET与$MRVL Celestial的类比)。 也存在容量风险: 但Win Semi认证的潜在优势抵消了这一点。 稀释风险以扩大产能,对于每个早期阶段的公司来说始终存在。 我去年做了$Lite的论点,至今仍喜欢这只股票用于Google TPU增长/OCS。 但今年,我专注于: $SIVE,作为我个人的CW DFB激光器敞口,用于新的光子学架构转换。 我分享自己的想法,捕捉从当前EML周期向即将到来的CW DFB/硅光子学周期的轮动。)

    英文原文

    Normally don’t respond to trolls, but the hypocrisy on this platform is pretty impressive. Random X retail: “Why didn’t you tell me about $LITE before it went up 1000% already?” Me: “Posts my thesis about the next possible $LITE at the very beginning, without paywalls.” X retail: 😡, “I’m going to pay $400 for a paywall to long $ADBE and short $PLTR instead”. Especially after my $AXTI thesis that already went from $12->$50 in 3 months... I distribute all my thought processes for free. And markets can price in any alpha immediately or however they want. (I get things wrong as well, especially with names like $ETOR that crashed from $65 to $33). However, instead of the original model where analysts sell a thesis for $2000+ to other hedge funds to slowly accumulate. Then retail buys at $40 billion+ as seen with $LITE. My account’s been growing because I’m one of the few analysts to break that model. And I distribute novel information synthesis for free to everyone. Stocks are a positive sum game where everyone benefits if a thesis is directionally correct.

  21. $SIVE是硅光子/CPO架构转变中的InP CW DFB激光器核心供应商,可能复制$LITE的估值扩张路径。

    $SIVE今天已上涨+73.78%(市值2.31亿美元)。 市场正在对下一个潜在的 photonics 瓶颈进行信息综合定价。 如果我必须解释区别: Lumentum的一个激光源主要受益于当前的光学瓶颈。 而$SIVE的激光源则面向即将到来的CPO/硅光子学(SiPh)瓶颈。 Lumentum目前主要从$NVDA和超大规模云服务商那里获益,这些公司正在确保EML激光器的产能,用于当前的可插拔(optical transceiver)光收发器周期。 从当前的EML瓶颈可以看出,超大规模云服务商正在抢购任何800G/1.6T光收发器及上游产能,从: -$AAOI(内部供应) -$COHR、$LITE(EML激光器+设计)-> $FN(组装) -$COHR、$LITE(EML激光器)-> Innolight / Eoptolink 下一步是什么? 硅光子学(Silicon Photonics)和共封装光学(Co-Packaged Optics,CPO)。 向CPO的架构转变需要大规模的高功率连续波(CW) DFB激光器阵列。 而这可能引发一次完全的、突然的需求量范式转变。 $SIVE受益于用于SiPh和CPO的磷化铟(InP) CW DFB激光器: 即将崛起的公司如: $AYAR、$POET使用$SIVE的激光器,但主要做先进封装(advanced packaging)。 然后它们向上输送给更大的公司如$MRVL Celestial(后者购买$POET的interposers)。 然而,如果你追溯到上游,光源是$SIVE。 CW DFB激光器是光引擎($SIVE);硅光子学封装($POET等)是传输方式。 CPO规模尚未达到。但我们知道它即将到来。 正如从当前光收发器周期所见: -$LITE和$COHR的光源需求获得的估值远高于$FN等专注先进封装的公司。 市场一直在关注$POET,但错过了它们获取Starlight实际$ITE型光源的地方。 风险是存在的,包括与$LITE、$COHR、$AVGO等公司面临多源竞争。所以再次强调,请务必做自己的研究。 但我对此的反驳: Sivers足够早地为$POET、Ayar和其他公司定制激光器以满足规格要求——早在这两家公司变得流行之前(类似于$POET与$MRVL Celestial的类比)。 也存在产量风险: 但Win Semi认证的潜在成功可以抵消这一点。 为扩大产能而稀释股权的风险,对于每个早期阶段的公司来说始终存在。 我去年做过$LITE的研究,仍看好这只股票用于Google TPU ramp/光电路开关(OCS)。 但今年,我专注于: $SIVE,作为新一轮光子学架构转变的个人CW DFB激光器敞口。 我分享自己对捕捉从当前EML周期向即将到来的CW DFB/硅光子学周期轮动的思考。

    英文原文

    $SIVE is now up +73.78% today ($231M MC). As markets price in information synthesis of the next potential $LITE of photonics. If I had to explain the difference: One laser source in Lumentum primarily benefits from current optical bottlenecks. The other in $SIVE is for the upcoming CPO/Silicon Photonic bottleneck. Lumentum is largely benefiting right now from $NVDA and hyperscalers securing capacity of EML lasers for current pluggable optical transceivers cycles. As seen with the current EML bottleneck, hyperscalers are buying out any 800G/1.6T transceiver + upstream capacity from: - $AAOI (in-house) - $COHR, $LITE (EML lasers + design) -> $FN (assembly) - $COHR, $LITE (EML lasers) -> Innolight / Eoptolink What's next? Silicon Photonics and Co-Packaged Optics. The architectural shift to CPO requires massive arrays of high-power CW DFB lasers. And this would likely trigger a complete, sudden paradigm shift in volume demand. $SIVE benefits from InP CW DFB lasers for SiPh and CPO: The up and coming companies like: $AYAR, $POET source $SIVE lasers, but primarily do advanced packaging. Then they feed up to larger companies like $MRVL Celestial (that buy $POET's interposers). However, if you go upstream, the light source is $SIVE. CW DFB lasers are light engine ( $SIVE ); the silicon photonics package ( $POET and others) is how it gets transmitted. CPO scale is not there yet. But we know it's coming. And as seen with current optical transceiver cycles: - Light sources from $LITE and $COHR demand much higher valuations than companies like $FN that focus on advanced packaging. Markets have been focusing on $POET, but missed where they get the actual $LITE type light source for Starlight. The risks are present including facing multi-source competition with $LITE, $COHR, $AVGO, and others. So again, make sure to do your own research. But my argument against that: Sivers been early enough to tailor custom lasers to fit $POET, Ayar, and other specifications before they got popular (sort like the $POET to $MRVL Celestial analogy). There's volume risks as well: But the potential Win Semi qualification offsets that. Dilution risk to scale capacity, is always present with every early-stage company as well. I did my thesis on $LITE last year and still love the stock for Google TPU ramp/OCS. But this year, I'm focusing on: $SIVE, as my personal CW DFB laser exposure for the new photonics architectural shift. I’m sharing my own thoughts on capturing the rotation from the current EML cycle to the upcoming CW DFB/Silicon Photonics cycle.

  22. 年初回顾自己在光子瓶颈、AXTI、EWY、RPI、IQE、Soitec 和 Venezuela 相关判断上的一系列兑现。

    只是回顾一下我今年的成绩。 2026 年前三个月,粉丝增长到 10 万+: - 预判了光子学即将出现的 InP 基板 / 原料瓶颈 - 识别出 $AXTI 是主要受益者(涨了 4 倍+) - 中国突然对日本实施即时出口管制,针对 InP 化合物 -> 在我那篇识别中国瓶颈以及住友 / 超大规模云脆弱性的 thesis 后没多久,这篇还拿了几百万浏览…… 我也不确定他们是不是看过我的帖子,如果看过,抱歉? - 预测了韩国市场波动上升,并把它映射成和 $EWY 有关的 IV 套利交易想法 - 一周后就被韩国央行关于即将到来的波动的表态验证了 - Bloomberg、Reuters、FT 以及其他媒体都引用了我关于 $RPI 的 thesis 帖 - 很多欧洲媒体也在谈为什么我看好 $IQE - 还有一堆法国新闻网站,以及 Citi、Kepler 的分析师,围绕我那篇关于 Soitec($SOI)的 TLDR thesis 帖发出了略带强势的研究意见 - 识别出委内瑞拉政局变化的主要受益者,比如 Gold Reserve,而且这只股票第二天就涨了 100%+ - 还发了关于委内瑞拉可能持有多少比特币的信息整合,结果被 CNN 等媒体大量报道! 我其他很多 thesis 帖,比如 $LITE,也在今年随着我对 $GOOGL TPU BOM 的映射,以及两次加倍后兑现了。 但这些都没上面那些酷! 短短两个月里!我喜欢保持谦虚,但偶尔也想吹一吹。 最棒的是,这次零售投资者因为 X 上的信息发现和免费传播,几乎都提前参与了很多趋势。 很期待未来会发生什么,也很高兴 X 给了我机会分享想法。

    英文原文

    Just a reflection on my accomplishments this year. Growing to 100K+ followers in the first three months of 2026: - Forecasted the upcoming InP substrate/feedstock bottleneck for photonics - Identified $AXTI as the main beneficiary (up 4x+) - China's suddenly enforced immediate export controls on Japan, targeting InP compounds -> shortly after my thesis identifying the China bottleneck and Sumitomo/hyperscaler vulnerabilities got a few million views... Not sure if they read my post, sorry if they did? - Predicted volatility increase of the South Korean Market and also mapped that into an IV arbitrage trade idea with $EWY - Got it spot on a week later with the Bank of Korea citing upcoming volatility - Had Bloomberg, Reuters, FT, and other news outlets citing my thesis post about $RPI - Bunch of European news sites talking about why I like $IQE - Had a bunch of French news sites and analysts from Citi, Kepler, putting out slightly aggressive notes about my Soitec ( $SOI ) TLDR thesis post. - Identified the main beneficiaries of Venezuela regime change like Gold Reserve, with the stock going up 100%+ the day after. - Published information synthesis on how much Bitcoin Venezuela might have had, and it blew up with a ton of media coverage like CNN and others! Lot of my other thesis posts like $LITE ended up playing out this year after mapping out $GOOGL TPU BOM and doubling. But it's not as cool as the ones above! In just two months! I like to stay humble, but I do want to brag from time to time. And best of all, retail investors were all early to a lot of these trends this time because of information discovery + free distribution over X. Excited to see what's to come in the future and I'm happy X gave me this opportunity to share my thoughts.

  23. 博主分享光子学供应链投资组合,按风险等级分层推荐多只股票。

    我是最早一批覆盖光子学供应链股票的人。 大多数自发布以来涨幅达到100-400%以上。 以下是我的核心论点帖的概要总结: 截至今日“最安全”的多头标的: - $TSEM(高塔半导体) - $SOI(Soitec) - $COHR——随时间推移具有防御性的复利型公司。 Soitec——在硅光子学/共封装光学(CPO)架构攀升中拥有基板垄断地位,估值极低(即使近期上涨40%+,可能仍只有1.4倍市净率)。 高塔半导体——2028年市盈率处于十几倍区间,70%以上的产能已被预订,是$NVDA架构合作伙伴,基本上是光子学领域的纯Play版$TSM。 Coherent——在光子学领域基本上覆盖从材料/基板到激光器再到光收发器的全产业链,同时也是许多其他垂直领域的基础供应商。 最高贝塔/极高增长多头标的: $AXTI——与Sumitomo形成磷化铟(InP)双头垄断(后者正面临出口管制),与Vital在上游原料端形成双头垄断。 基本上,AXT处于整个光子学食物链的顶端。出口管制风险确实存在,但我的论点是:如果AXT倒下,那么AI驱动的光子学建设也会崩塌。所以还不如做多AXT。 $AAOI——到2027年收入增长10倍。激光器->设计->组装,美国制造。主要不确定性在于执行能力、扩大从$COHR收购的激光器产能等。 超大规模数据中心运营商的需求都存在。他们能交付吗?我愿意承担这个风险。 $IQE——基本上完全依赖重组和清理债务(市值约2亿美元)。作为$LITE的外延晶圆(epiwafer)知名供应商,其主要竞争对手Landmark估值超过35亿美元。 其现有产能(反应器)潜力存在,但基本上需要成功转型光子学并切断传统业务的拖累,才能实现10倍的重新定价。 风险最高,但也可能有相应的回报。 做多$GOOGL TPU生态系统相关: $LITE——由于光学电路交换机(OCS)垄断地位,其光学相关的物料清单(BOM)占比非常高。 如果你认为谷歌TPU是一个可能最终像$NVDA那样的万亿美元项目,那就做多$LITE。 谷歌计划2026年资本支出1750-1800亿美元,其AI基础设施CTO表示计划逐年增加,可能在未来8年投入1万亿美元。 如果这个计划成立,$LITE相对于未来潜力来说估值极低。当然,他们也向其他超大规模数据中心运营商供应激光器,但我会说它与谷歌增长的关联度更高。 _ 还有许多其他我覆盖过的标的: $POET——我本人不做多,但其4亿美元资产负债表提供了良好的缓冲。我发现从$MRVL攀升中发现的Celestial项目太遥远——例如2028年预计收入5亿美元、2029年10亿美元——对于2026年来说不具实质意义。 这很大程度上取决于他们的中介器(interposers)是否能获得其他超大规模数据中心运营商的认证,而不是通过Marvell走后门——这是主要的看涨逻辑。 $HIMX——我确实发现这个论点略有说服力,作为可能的$TSM共封装光学(CPO)供应商。 但我个人更偏好$SOI,会将更多集中度投入其中(因为Soitec作为已知供应商已基本覆盖整个硅光子学领域,而且刚从下行周期中走出)。 还有很多其他的如$NOK、$SHMN也很有趣,但我个人已将集中度投入到我认为最有说服力的标的。 像$LITE这样的“拥挤标的”并不意味着没有剩余上涨空间。只是在有新消息之前,估值已经更多地被反映进去了。 存在许多“关键供应商”,但供应链中的重要性...与将其转化为极高营收增长(例如$AAOI -> 45亿美元营收)之间存在差异。 但对于光子学敞口的简要总结,我的投资组合大致如下: 高集中度(更安全): $TSEM晶圆代工、$SOI基板、$COHR全产业链 做多+卖看跌期权组合(高波动性): $AXTI基板/原料、$IQE外延晶圆、$AAOI光收发器供应链 然后做多谷歌相关$LITE

    英文原文

    I've been the first few to cover many supply chain photonic names. Most are up 100-400%+ since I've posted. Here's the TLDR overview of my thesis posts: “Safest” Longs as of Today: - $TSEM (Tower Semi) - $SOI (Soitec) - $COHR - Defensible compounders over time. Soitec - Substrate monopoly over silicon photonics / CPO architectural ramp at dirt cheap valuation (after recent 40%+ rise maybe still 1.4x book) Tower Semi - P/E in the 10's for 2028, 70%+ capacity booked already, $NVDA architectural partner, and basically the pure play $TSM of photonics. Coherent - Basically does everything from materials/substrates to lasers to transceivers in photonics. As well as fundamental supplier to many other verticals. Most High Beta/Extreme Growth Longs: $AXTI - InP duopoly with Sumitomo (that getting export controlled), upstream feedstock duopoly with Vital. Basically at the top of the entire photonics food chain is AXT. There's certainty export control risks, but my thesis is that if AXT goes down, the photonic buildout with AI goes down. So might as well go long on AXT. $AAOI - 10x revenue ramp into 2027. Laser -> Design -> Assembly, Made in America. Main uncertainty is execution, scaling laser capacity that they've bought from $COHR, etc. Demand from hyperscalers are all there. Can they deliver? I'd take the risk. $IQE - Basically completely dependent on restructuring and clearing debt (~$200M MC). Known $LITE supplier for epiwafers, and their main competitor was Landmark with a $3.5B+ valuation. The latent capacity is there with reactors, but they basically need to pull off a successful pivot over to photonics and cut off legacy drag for 10x rerating. Highest risk out there, but maybe worth the reward.s Long $GOOGL TPU Ecosystem: $LITE - Basically very high BOM related to optical due to OCS monopoly for Google. If you think Google TPU is a trillion dollar program that might end up like $NVDA, go long on $LITE. Google has $175-180B capex planned for 2026, and their CTO for AI Infra said they plan to up that Y/Y, probably spending $1 trillion in the next 8 years. If that holds up, $LITE is extremely undervalued relative to forward potential. Of course the supply lasers to other hyperscalers too, but I'd say it's more heavily tethered to Google growth. _ There's a ton of others out there I've covered like: $POET - I'm personally not long, but $400M balance sheet gives it good cushion. Just found Celestial from $MRVL ramp was too far out, eg. $500 million 2028, $1 billion 2029 projections, for revenue to be too material as of 2026. It largely depends if their interposers get other hyperscaler qualifications rather than backdooring through Marvell, which was the main bull case. $HIMX- I did find this thesis to be slightly compelling as a likely $TSM COUPE supplier. But personally, I preferred $SOI, and would just put more concentration into that (since Soitec known supplier already to basically everything silicon photonics, and is just coming out of a downturn). There’s a lot more like $NOK, $SHMN, that are interesting, but I’ve personally out concentration into the ones I find most compelling. As “crowded names” like $LITE, it does not mean there’s no upside left. It just happens to be more priced in until there’s new news. There's a lot of "critical suppliers" but there's a difference between importance in the supply chain... And converting that into extreme revenue growth eg. $AAOI -> $4.5 billion in revenue. But for TLDR photonics exposure, my portfolio looks similar to this: High Concentration (Safer) $TSEM foundry, $SOI substrate, $COHR everything Mix of Long + CSP (High Volaility): $AXTI substrate/feedstock, $IQE epiwafer, $AAOI transceiver supply chain Then Long Google with $LITE

  24. 供应链分析 $GOOGL$LITE$AXTI

    指出 AXTI 站在光子供应链最上游

    InP 衬底,以及制造它们所需的原材料。 基本上,如果你一路追到整个光子供应链的最上游,也就是 $GOOGL 的 TPU 或 $LITE 所用到的那一层,那里站着的就是 $AXTI,像宝可梦冠军一样。

    英文原文

    @DhruTech InP substrates and raw materials needed to build them. Basically if you go to the very very top of the entire photonics supply chains that $GOOGL TPUs or $LITE uses. There sits $AXTI as the Pokémon champion

  25. 个股论点 $CODA$GOOGL$KRKNF$LITE

    伊朗霍尔木兹海峡布雷,推荐两只水下战争纯正标的$KRKNF和$CODA,均有优质基本面。

    10分钟前来自Reuters的消息: 消息人士新确认伊朗已在霍尔木兹海峡部署了约十枚水雷。 我发现有两只水下 warfare(海上战争)股票很有意思,可以提供敞口。 $KRKNF 章鱼🦑和$CODA 水母。 $KRKNF:Kraken Robotics,Anduril(安杜里尔)的供应商,是海上战争领域最纯正的标的之一: 他们生产合成孔径声纳(SAS)和SeaPower电池,许多防务主承包商如Anduril都依赖这些。 Anduril最近在罗德岛开设了一家工厂,用于大规模生产UUV(无人水下航行器)(如Dive-LD和Ghost Shark)。 根据零售端BOM估算: - Dive-LD携带价值1M至2M加元的Kraken硬件 - Ghost Shark XL-AUV携带价值8M至10M加元。 如果Anduril实现量产:收入增长是可期的。 我不会基于收入预测来建模Kraken,而更像看Anduril能扩展到多大(类似于用$GOOGL的TPU来建模$LITE)。 但财务状况、资产:3.015亿美元,负债:6570万美元,总债务约2410万美元,看起来相当健康。毛利率59%的基础上实现60%的年度收入增长。 至于在海峡排雷,他们有KATFISH猎雷无人机。以及用于生成海底3D图像的SAS声纳,用于识别埋藏的水雷。 $CODA:Coda Octopus,基本上是伊朗布雷这一情境的纯正敞口。 他们的主要产品是Echoscope实时3D/4D/5D体积声纳,可在浑浊、漆黑的水中绘制静态和移动物体的图像。 这一技术延伸至其他产品如"NANO Gen Series",即作为UUV感知传感器的Echoscope版本。 还有一个供潜水员使用的增强显示设备(SPECWAR已订购),基本上就是将Echoscope声纳数据反馈给人员。 CODA的资产负债表非常亮眼。最新FY2025报告(截至2025年10月),他们持有2870万美元的纯现金,且没有长期债务。 毛利率也非常高,综合毛利率66.5%,而大多数防务承包商只有10-20%。 2025年收入2660万美元,同比增长30.7%,净利润410万美元,能实现盈利实属难得。 基本上他们的声纳/探测产品组合对于这个具体情境来说是非常纯粹的标的,即使没有这个催化剂,基本面也非常扎实。 无论如何,伊朗在海峡布雷并不是一个重大的TAM(总可寻址市场)增加。 然而,它确实提醒投资者和政府,战争可能转向水下: 从而带来更多板块资金流入以及防务合同机会。 这些是我个人的两只最爱,既然发表了看法,也希望对其他人有帮助。

    英文原文

    Just in 10M ago from Reuters: New confirmation from sources that Iran has deployed about a dozen mines in the Strait of Hormuz. There's two very aquatic warfare stocks I found interesting for exposure. $KRKNF the Squid🦑and $CODA the Octopus. $KRKNF: Kraken Robotics, the Andruil supplier, is one of the more pure play stocks for the acquatic warfare sector: They build Synthetic Aperture Sonar (SAS) and SeaPower batteries that many defense primes like Andruil rely on. Anduril recently opened a facility in Rhode Island to mass produce UUVs (eg. Dive-LD and Ghost Shark). According to retail BOM estimates: - Dive-LD carries $1M to $2M CAD in Kraken hardware - Ghost Shark XL-AUV carries $8M to $10M CAD. If that Anduril ramps happens: the revenue ramp is there. I wouldn't try and model Kraken based off revenue projections but more like how much Andruil scales (similar modeling $LITE based on $GOOGL TPU) But financials, assets: $301.5M, Liabilities: $65.7M, Total debt: ~$24.1M so looks pretty healthy. 60% YoY revenue growth off 59% gross margins. As for demining the strait, they have the KATFISH mine-hunting drone. And SAS Sonar for 3D images of the seafloor for identifying buried mines. $CODA: Coda Octopus, basically pure play exposure to Iran placing mines. Their main product is Echoscope real-time 3D/4D/5D volumetric sonar that maps static and moving objects in murky, pitch-black water. This carries forward to other products like "NANO Gen Series", Echoscope version as a perception sensor for UUVs. And then a diver augmented display (that SPECWAR ordered), which is basically the Echoscope sonar feeding people data. CODA has an amazing balance sheet. Recent FY2025 report (ending Oct 2025), they hold $28.7 million in pure cash and have zero long-term debt. Gross margins are extremely high as well, consolidated gross margin of 66.5% while majority of defense contracotrs sit around 10-20%. $26.6M revenue for 2025, 30.7% Y/Y increase, and $4.1M net income, which is rare to be profitable. But basically their product set of sonar / detection looks perfect pure play for this exact scenario and they’re fundamentally very sound, without the catalyst. Regardless, Iran mining the straight isn't exactly a major TAM increase. However, it does alert investors and the government that warfare may transition underwater: Leading to more sector inflows as well as defense contract opportunities. These were my two favorites personally, just publishing my thoughts here in case other's find this helpful.

  26. AXTI与住友垄断InP衬底,成AI光子化关键瓶颈。

    匿名者,你听了我关于 $AXTI 的论点吗? 警告:整个 AI 行业可能会受到两家公司的瓶颈制约: 1. $AXTI(市值 7 亿美元) 2. $SMTOY(市值 317 亿美元) 这两家公司控制了全球 60–70% 以上的磷化铟(InP)衬底市场。 未来的 $NVDA、$GOOGL TPU v7 集群、$META、$MSFT、$AMZN 超大规模计算集群都需要基于磷化铟(InP)的激光器和接收器。 $AVGO、$LITE、$COHR 使用磷化铟(InP)用于 800G/1.6T 光收发器中的电吸收调制激光器(EML)、分布反馈激光器(DFB)及其他光基础设施。 如果没有磷化铟(InP)衬底,供应链就会停滞。 在查看了从 TPU 到 Maia 的物料清单(BOM)后,看起来未来的专用集成电路(ASIC)、GPU 和超大规模部署严重依赖光子学。 而这两家供应商可能会冻结全球磷化铟(InP)衬底市场,涵盖几乎所有领域: - 超大规模计算光学(TPU 集群等) - 光收发器(5G、数据) - 激光雷达(LiDAR)(Robotaxi、无人机、军事) - 光模块(互连集群) - 硅光子学激光芯片(Nvidia 未来的共封装光学(CPO)以及 Intel/Broadcom 硅光子学引擎使用磷化铟(InP)连续波激光阵列。) 由于这些公司占据了市场供应的大多数: - AXTI(估计 ~30–35%) - 住友(估计 ~30%) - JX 日本(估计 10-15%) 仅此而已。(例如,Yole 2021 年的行业报告指出“住友电工 + AXT 共同拥有‘超过 75%’的磷化铟(InP)衬底市场”) 超大规模计算/AI 正在向光子学转变,但整个 AI 行业是脆弱的。 如果 $AXTI 或 $SMTOY 中的任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来的 AI 建设就会瘫痪。更疯狂的是,一家 7 亿美元的公司可能成为这一切的中心。 随着 AI 行业向光子学转变,磷化铟(InP)衬底可能会与高带宽内存(HBM)一起成为最大的瓶颈之一。

    英文原文

    Hope you listened to my $AXTI thesis anon? https://t.co/d5eg0BIhlG

  27. 供应链分析 $AVGO$GOOGL$LITE$ORCL$TSM

    谷歌CTO暗示AI支出激增,澄清市场误判,看好AI基建加速。

    @4intheflames $GOOGL 人工智能首席技术官刚刚明确暗示未来8年将增加支出。 https://t.co/zSf77JAHBQ (该推文引用了 @aleabitoreddit 的推文,引用内容仅供理解语境): “谷歌数据中心建设规模可能超过1万亿美元” 这对谷歌TPU生态系统1.5万亿美元以上的资本支出意味着什么: 对$LITE、联发科、$AVGO、$TSM、SK海力士、三星等均为广泛利好。 在接受福布斯关于人工智能资本支出的采访时,$GOOGL首席技术官表示: “今年(资本支出)在1750亿至1850亿美元之间,假设不会下降,人们可以想象这在10年内可能延伸到某个巨大的数字。” 福布斯评论道:“谷歌的数据中心野心与OpenAI有着巨大差异:谷歌是一台赚钱机器。” 昨天,市场抛售了OpenAI和$ORCL相关的半导体股票,导致一些“星际之门”相关项目暂停。 市场将OpenAI的成长阵痛与由最富有的超大规模云服务商资助的更广泛的人工智能基础设施建设混为一谈。 从$GOOGL和印钞机般的Mag7角度来看: 人工智能基础设施建设在未来十年看来只会加速。

    英文原文

    @4intheflames $GOOGL CTO of AI literally just signaled increase spend over the next 8 years. https://t.co/zSf77JAHBQ

  28. 供应链分析 $AVGO$GOOGL$LITE$ORCL$TSM

    谷歌AI基建支出庞大且持续加速,利好相关半导体供应链。

    “谷歌数据中心建设规模可能突破1万亿美元” 这对谷歌TPU生态系统1.5万亿美元以上的资本支出(capex)意味着什么: 对$LITE、联发科(Mediatek)、$AVGO、$TSM、SK海力士、三星等普遍利好。 在接受福布斯关于AI资本支出的采访时,$GOOGL首席技术官(CTO)表示: “今年在1750亿至1850亿美元之间,假设不会下降,人们可以想象这在10年内可能延伸到某个巨大的数字” 福布斯评论道:“谷歌的数据中心野心与OpenAI有着巨大差异:谷歌是一台赚钱机器” 昨日,市场抛售了OpenAI和$ORCL相关的半导体股,暂停了一些Stargate相关项目。 市场将OpenAI的成长阵痛与由最富有的超大规模云服务商(hyperscalers)资助的更广泛的AI基础设施建设混为一谈。 从$GOOGL和印钞机般的Mag7角度来看: AI基础设施建设在未来十年看来只会加速。

    英文原文

    “Google’s Data Center Buildout Could Top 1 Trillion” The implications for $1.5T+ in capex spend for the Google TPU ecosystem: From $LITE, Mediatek, $AVGO, $TSM, SK Hynix, Samsung and others are widely positive. In an interview with Forbes on AI capex spend, $GOOGL CTO stated: “We’re at $175 to $185 billion this year, one could imagine, assuming it's not going to go down, that this could extend to some big number over 10 years” Forbes comments: “There’s a big difference between Google’s data center ambitions and OpenAI’s: Google is a money-making machine” Yesterday, markets sold off semi names from OpenAI + $ORCL putting a pause on some Stargate related projects. The market conflated OpenAI's growing pains with the broader AI infrastructure buildout funded by the richest hyperscalers. From $GOOGL and a money-printing Mag7 perspective: The AI buildout only looks to accelerate over the next decade.

  29. 个股论点 $COHR$LITE$NVDA

    看好LITE和COHR,受NVDA注资及Google资本支出扩张驱动。

    它们现在的定价非常合理,我预计像 $LITE 这样的公司明年股价可能会达到 1000 美元以上。它们每家都刚刚从 $NVDA 获得了 20 亿美元的新增注资,且估值远高于当前股价,同时现在正获得数十亿美元的标普指数被动资金流入。因此,除了今天 AH 对 MM 的压制/小动作外,这在结构上为光子学(Photonics)板块带来了巨大的顺风。如果查看 Google TPU 的物料清单(BOM),$LITE 约占 8-12%,而 Google 仅在今年的资本支出(capex)就大幅扩张(例如约 1800 亿美元)。我很确定这两家公司的 2028 年远期市盈率(fwd p/e)都在 20 年代中期或 30 年代初期,考虑到它们的增长($COHR 业务全面,$LITE 在光电路交换(OCS)领域具有垄断地位),这是合理的。

    英文原文

    They're really well priced right now, and I expect companies like $LITE to probably end up $1000+ next year. Each of them just got $2B each in new funding from $NVDA at way higher share values and now have billions in S&P index passive inflows. So this is structurally a large tailwind for the photonics sector, minus AH MM pinning/shenanigans today. If you look at Google TPU BOM $LITE is ~8-12% of it and Google's expanding capex enormously this year alone (eg. ~$180B). Pretty sure both of them have 2028 mid ~20s or low 30s fwd p/e, which makes sense given their growth ( $COHR does everything, $LITE OCS monopoly).

  30. 个股论点 $AAOI$COHR$GOOGL$LITE

    对比LITE、AAOI和COHR的风险收益特征及配置建议

    这取决于你的风险偏好。我非常看好 $LITE,由于它与 $GOOGL 的 TPU 项目紧密绑定,股价很可能继续走高。 鉴于 $AAOI 的市值规模及营收的极端增长潜力,其实现多倍回报的潜力更大,我只是想尝试寻找下一个 $LITE。 我认为 $COHR 可能是最安全的选择,如果我要配置资金并使其成为最大仓位的话。

    英文原文

    Depends on your risk profile. I really, really like $LITE, likely going higher as it's tethered to $GOOGL TPU program. $AAOI just has more potential for multi-x return given MC size and extreme revenue ramp, just wanted to try and find the next $LITE. I do think $COHR is probably the safest, if I were to be parking capital + making it the largest position.