$AAOI

提及 456 首次 2025-12-11 最近 2026-08-10

相关推文

共 460 条 · 按时间倒序 · 滚到底自动加载更多

  1. 供应链分析 $AAOI$AXTI$LITE$SIVE

    LITE财报证实CPO 27H2放量,CW激光供需失衡且中国厂商落后。

    $LITE 财报电话会要点: - “我们对共封装光学(CPO)规模化部署的时间表可见度已提高。我们确信,2027年下半年我们的超高功率激光芯片需求将强劲增长。” Lumentum 确认其领先客户将于 2027 年下半年启动 CPO 规模化放量。 - “我们最近获得了首个外部光源(ELS)模块订单,将于 2027 年下半年交付。” ELS 行业放量时间表。 - “非平面光学(NPO)机会对我们完全是增量,显著增加了光学市场的总规模(TAM)。” 激光瓶颈俱乐部的 TAM 进一步扩大。 - “我们预计 1.6T 光模块的采用将从财年第一季度开始加速,并持续至 2027 年。” - “即使在连续波(CW)激光领域,我们对自己提价的能力也感到惊讶。” $SIVE 及其他 CW 激光玩家拥有积极的定价权。 - “因此,我们能够获得可观的价格溢价,并预计这种溢价将维持下去,即使这些中国厂商上线。我也提醒人们,我认为一些中国激光供应商目前并未在市场上实际交付,所以当它们抛出那些大数字时,没有追索权。迄今为止,我们在其产出方面尚未看到类似情况。” 中国厂商在激光/产能方面落后于市场预期,得到 $AAOI 和 $LITE 的证实。 - “不幸的是,我们在高功率激光的发货上远远落后。” “需求信号增加,相对于我们的供应能力,我们更加落后。” 超高功率(UHP) CW 激光产能存在极端供需失衡,EML 需求持续失衡。年底发货约 +5000 万美元 -> 1 亿美元+(“三位数季度”),进入 2027 年下半年和 2028 年更大的规模化需求。 - “所以,我认为过去三个月我们真正试图做的是确保更多的衬底供应”(因为供需失衡),“我们从 $AXTI 找到了额外的衬底帮助。他们是伟大的合作伙伴。” 磷化铟(InP)衬底瓶颈出现。 要点总结: - Lumentum 确认 CPO 2027 年下半年放量,驳斥任何“延迟”新闻为市场“噪音”。(一份延迟报告造成了巨大损害,Nvidia、Lumentum 等公司花了数周进行危机公关)。 - CW 激光需求在 2027 年下半年放量。 - 超高功率 CW 激光产能的极端供需失衡让 Lumentum 感到惊讶。 - 超高功率激光拥有极高利润率,并能对 CW 激光产能提价。 - 中国在激光/产能方面进一步落后。 基本上验证了西方 CW 激光玩家的时间表 + 需求/定价。 在主要放量开始之前,CW 激光的稀缺性已经发生……

    英文原文

    $LITE earnings transcript TLDRs: - "Our visibility into the timing of CPO scale-up deployments has also sharpened. We remain confident in a demand ramp for our ultra-high-power laser chips in the second half of calendar 2027" H2 2027 start of CPO scale up ramp confirmed from Lumentum for their lead customer. - "We were recently given our first external light source, or ELS, module purchase for delivery by the second half of calendar 2027" ELS industry ramp timelines - "The NPO opportunity is completely additive for us, significantly increasing the optical TAM." More TAM for laser chokepoint club - "we expect the 1.6T transceiver uptake to intensify starting in fiscal Q1 and sustain through calendar 2027." - "Even in CW, we’ve been surprised at our ability to price up" Positive pricing power for $SIVE and the other CW laser players. - "As a result, we are able to command a nice price premium that we expect to sustain, as these Chinese if these Chinese guys come online. I caution people also, I think people are some of these Chinese laser suppliers are not delivering in the market today, so they have there is no recourse when they throw out these big numbers. We have not seen anything like that to date in terms of their output." Chinese players are more behind than markets expect, corroborated by $AAOI and $LITE. - "We are way behind in our shipments, unfortunately, on high-powered lasers" "The demand signal has increased, and we are very much further behind relative to our ability to supply." Extreme demand imbalance for UHP CW laser capacity, continued demand imbalance for EML. Shipping roughly +$50M year end -> $100m+ ("triple digit quarter") into much larger H2 2027 and 2028 scale up demand,. - "So what we are trying to do, I think, really in the last three months is secure even more substrate supply" (because of demand imbalance), "we found additional substrate help from $AXTI They are a great partner." Hello InP substrate bottleneck. TLDR: - Lumentum CPO scale up H2 2027 shipments got confirmed, dismissed any "delay" news as market "noise". (one delay report caused so much damage, and it took Nvidia, Lumentum, and all these companies weeks to do damage control). - CW lasers demand ramp second half of 2027 - Extreme demand imbalance for UHP CW laser capacity surprised Lumentum - UHP lasers commands very high margins and is able to price up CW laser capacity. - China further behind in the laser/capacity angle. Basically just validated timelines + demand/pricing for Western CW laser players. CW laser scarcity is already happening before the main volume ramp even begins...

  2. 供应链分析 $AAOI

    AAOI产能受限,优先自供激光器,CPO部署短期承压。

    @Berlinergy $AAOI:“我们根本无法生产足够的[共封装光学(CPO)激光器]来满足其当前第一代[CPO]部署的需求,因为产能确实不足。我们必须优先确保为自家光模块生产激光器。”这仅适用于早期CPO相关部署的初步解读。

    英文原文

    @Berlinergy $AAOI: "We just can’t make enough of them [CPO lasers] to be involved in their current first-generation [CPO] deployments because there’s just not enough capacity. We have to prioritize our ability to make lasers for our own transceivers first" This is just for early CPO related deployment read through.

  3. 个股论点 $AAOI$COHR$LITE$SIVEF

    LITE财报超预期,指引强劲,看好CPO渗透及同行受益。

    $LITE 财报出炉,表现非常强劲: 营收:10.1亿美元,环比+24.5%,同比+109.3% vs. 预期约9.846亿美元 调整后每股收益(Adj. EPS):3.23美元 vs. 预期约2.95美元 毛利率(非GAAP):50.4% / 营业利润率(非GAAP) 36.6% FY2027 Q1指引可能更重要: 营收:12.25亿–12.75亿美元 vs. 预期约11.6亿美元 调整后每股收益:4.05–4.35美元 vs. 预期约3.63美元 营业利润率(非GAAP) 39.5% - 40.5% 关于备注: 看到:“对超高功率共封装光学(CPO)激光器的需求增加,ELS模块获得初始订单” - 对其他CPO玩家如 $SIVEF、$COHR 等有很好的传导效应(read through)。(可能不包括 $AAOI,因为它们错过了第一代部署) - “NPO参与的广度是光学开始渗透机架内连接性的初步迹象,显著提升了我们的光学总可寻址市场(TAM)” - 营收预测“比目标模型提前一个多季度达成。” 正如预期的极其强劲的财报,营收从: 8.08亿 -> 10.1亿 -> 12.5亿,同时营业利润率持续增加... 这只是我的初步印象。 最重要的是即将召开的财报电话会议。

    英文原文

    $LITE earnings are out, very strong earnings: Revenue: $1.01B, +24.5% Q/Q, +109.3% Y/Y growth vs. ~$984.6M Adj. EPS: $3.23 vs. ~$2.95 Gross Margin (non-gaap): 50.4% / Operating margin (non-gaap) 36.6% Q1 FY2027 guidance is probably more important: Revenue: $1.225–1.275B vs. ~$1.16B Adj. EPS: $4.05–4.35 vs. ~$3.63 Operating margin (non-gaap) of 39.5% - 40.5% In terms of notes: Sees: "Increasing demand for ultra-high-power CPO lasers, an initial order for ELS modules" - Great read through on other CPO players like $SIVEF, $COHR, and others. (maybe not AAOI since they're missing out on first-gen deployments) - "Breath of NPO engagements are the first signs that optics are starting to penetrate in-rack connectivity, significantly upping our optical TAM" - Revenue projections "reaching our target model more than a quarter ahead of schedule." Extremely strong earnings as expected, you have revenue going from: $808M -> $1.01B -> $1.25B while operating margin keeps increasing... Just my first impressions. Most important thing is the earnings call coming up soon.

  4. 个股论点 $AAOI

    AAOI 多技术周期叠加,2028 年 CPO 产能将带来巨大增量。

    给那些认为 $AAOI 只是单年周期股的人提个醒: $AAOI 预计其用于共封装光学(CPO) 的 ELSFP 产能将在 2028 年达到每月 40 万片。 40 万 * ~$400 ELS 平均售价(ASP,高盛假设) = 新增约 19.2 亿美元/年的年化营收产能,作为一条全新且独立(毛利率 >50%)的产品线。 这叠加在他们现有的 2027 年预测之上(例如,下半年起月营收 4.71 亿美元,对应年化光模块营收约 56 亿美元)。 1.6T 的潜在市场(TAM) 也在飙升,所以我预计随着更多产能上线,他们 2027 年下半年的预测值会进一步上调... 对于某些光通信标的,这是一个周期(例如 1.6T、CPO 规模化、NPO 等)叠加在另一个周期之上... 再叠加另一个... 随着 TAM 和利润率像《英雄联盟》中艾尼维亚使用 W 技能后的小精灵一样层层堆叠。 而不是仅仅依靠单一年份的“一次性”爆发。 这与某些其他板块形成鲜明对比,那些板块在经历可能仅一年的三位数同比营收增长后,增长可能会放缓。

    英文原文

    Just putting it out there for people that think AAOI is a one year cycle... $AAOI projects their ELSFP capacity for CPO to be 400K/units a month in 2028. 400k * ~$400 ELS ASP (GS assumptions) = + another ~$1.92B 2028 annualized revenue capacity added as a new distinct (>50% gross margin) product line. On top of their existing 2027 projections (eg. ~$5.6B annualized transceiver revenue off $471m/month entering H2). TAM for 1.6T also goes brrr so I'd expect their end of H2 2027 projections to go up as more capacity comes online... For certain optical names, it's one cycle (eg. 1.6T, CPO scale out/up, NPO etc. ), stacked on top of one another... stacked on top of another... with TAM + margins stacking like minions after Anivia uses W in line. Rather than one-and-done off of one year. This is a stark contrast to some other sectors where growth is likely to decelerate after maybe 1 year of triple digit Y/Y revenue growth.

  5. 杂谈 $AAOI

    讽刺 Barrons 招聘非专业人士研究光学供应链,双方均表示不懂。

    Be Barrons: - 想写关于像 $AAOI 这样的光学供应链的文章 - 招聘 DPT:谁需要工程师来写这种简单的事?让我们找被低估的政治哲学背景的人。 - 结果发现新雇员来自非营利组织沟通咨询 - 上班第一天:带薪建模收入增长/利润率预测、CW 激光器(连续波激光器)瓶颈、内部产能 - 新雇员:“我不懂这鬼东西”,“看起来像模因股(memestock)” Barrons:“模因股?看起来像我们要写的下一篇文章,我也不懂”。

    英文原文

    Be Barrons: - Wants to write about optical supply supply chains like $AAOI - Hiring DPT: who needs engineers to write about this something this simple? Let’s find underpaid political philosophy backgrounds. - proceeds to find a new hire from nonprofit communication consulting - first day on job: gets paid to model revenue ramp/margins projections, CW laser bottlenecks, internal capacity - New hire: “I don’t understand this sht”, “looks like a memestock” Barrons: “Memestock? looks like our next article, I don’t understand either”.

  6. 方法论 $AAOI$LITE$SIVE

    引用研究指出低频交易优于过度交易,建议散户保持信念避免恐慌抛售。

    现在市场又在举办激光派对,从 $SIVE、OE Solutions、$LITE、Coherent 到 $AAOI。有一项有趣的研究:富达(Fidelity)和加州大学伯克利分校(UC Berkeley)的论文都指出,表现最好的投资者通常是那些…… - 偶然忘记账户的人(富达) - 不主动交易/不过度交易的人(低频交易者回报18.5% vs 11.4%)。 这不是建议,但这些轶事可能对散户阅读有帮助…… 因为我目睹了记忆、光子学或主题波动性的大量投降式抛售,导致散户在强劲反弹时没有持仓。 拥有信念通常也属于“不过度交易”阵营,因为这有助于在下跌时不过度交易,或看到补仓机会。

    英文原文

    Now that markets are hosting a laser party again from $SIVE, OE Solutions, $LITE, Coherent, to $AAOI. There’s a pretty interesting study: Both from Fidelity and a UC Berkeley research paper, that the best investors are the ones who either… - Anecdotally forgot about their account (Fidelity) - Didn’t actively trade/overtrade (18.5% return from infrequent traders vs. 11.4%). Not any advice, but some of these anecdotes might be helpful to retail to read in general… Since I witnessed a lot capitulation off memory, photonics, or thematic volatility, just for retail not have positions on a sharp recovery. Having conviction also usually people in that “not overtrading” camp, since it helps to not overtrade in drops or see opportunities to cost average.

  7. 供应链分析 $AAOI$LITE$POET

    光模块供需失衡且产能售罄,预计LITE财报强劲并作为行业风向标。

    @00m00oo 我认为从 $AAOI 的财报中我们已经得到了太多关于光模块(Optical Transceivers)需求存在20-40%失衡以及激光器(Lasers)成为瓶颈的暗示。 而且 $POET 在其年度股东大会(AGM)上表示,未来两年三大云厂商的产能已完全售罄。 我通常不做财报涨跌预测,因为那大多时候就像抛硬币一样随机。但我可以说,除非有非常意外的情况,否则大部分定价调整在财报发布前就已经发生。 无论如何,我预计 $LITE 的财报会非常强劲,我主要将其作为其他激光器厂商的参考指标(read-through)。

    英文原文

    @00m00oo I think we already got too many hints from $AAOI earnings about demand 20-40% imbalance for optical transivers with lasers as a bottleneck. And $POET stating big 3 are completely sold out of capacity next 2 years during their AGM. I don’t give earnings up or down predictions since it’s a coin flip most of the time. But I can say that a lot of pricing happens before earnings, unless there’s something very unexpected. Regardless I expect $LITE earnings to come out really strong, and I primary use it as a read through for your other laser players.

  8. 个股论点 $AAOI$AEVA$GFS$JBL$MTSI$POET$SIVE

    看好SIVE获代工产能及上市融资,预期2027H1收入拐点。

    @wannabepanacea 鉴于目前业界普遍传闻共封装光学(CPO)中的分布式反馈激光器(DFB)短缺,我其实挺好奇 $SIVE 能否获得更多晶圆代工产能分配。因为我相当确信,一旦其资格认证进入量产爬坡阶段,产品就会售罄。除此之外: > 其他财报(如 $MTSI / $AAOI)重申的需求/供应失衡有助于佐证这一点。 > 上一份财报中提到的与可插拔(Pluggable)玩家的新进展/资格认证,可能是影响最大的因素。 > 与 $JBL、~ $AEVA、$POET、$GFS 或其他机会的进展,如果能获得初步采购订单(PO)那就太好了。 > 重申纳斯达克上市更新(我们已经得到消息,计划在未来几个季度完成)。我个人仍将此列为优先事项,因为它能为其并购(M&A)活动解锁更多资金,希望用于可插拔技术栈。 我认为收入拐点大约在 2027 年上半年开始,因此当前的收入/利润数据并不重要。 如果 $AAOI 能发表类似“我们制造的任何东西都预计在 2028 年售罄”的声明,那就太棒了。

    英文原文

    @wannabepanacea I’m actually kinda curious about $SIVE securing more foundry allocation given widespread CW DFB shortages now. Since I’m pretty confident it sells out once qualifications go into volume ramp. But aside from that > reaffirm demand/supply imbalance from other earnings like $MTSI / $AAOI helps > new development/qualifications mentioned in previous earnings with pluggable players, probably most material > Progress with $JBL, ~ $AEVA, $POET, $GFS or other opportunities, maybe initial POs would be nice. > Nasdaq listing update reiterated (we already got updates it’s planned completion next few quarters). I still place that on priority personally since it unlocks more funding for their M&A efforts, hopefully down the pluggable stack. I think the revenue inflection starts around H1 2027, so current revenue/profit numbers are not very material. An $AAOI statement like anything we make we expect to be sold in 2028 or something would be kinda goated.

  9. 供应链分析 $AAOI$MTSI$SIVE

    InP激光器短缺利好SIVE,可套用AAOI产能模型。

    我认为现在是重新审视 $SIVE 的时机,其年化产能收入的中位预测约为 4.27 亿美元。 鉴于近期的行业财报: > $AAOI 指出光模块(transceivers)需求存在 20-40% 的失衡(激光器是瓶颈)。 > $MTSI 表示许多“客户因磷化铟(InP)DFB 激光器普遍短缺而紧急联系我们”(在其他产品线中)。 > 美国提议禁止新的中国光模块(中际旭创/新易盛)。 > AOI 因激光器被分配给光模块,未实质性参与第一代共封装光学(CPO)部署。 解读是:可以将适用于 $AAOI 的产能-需求吸收模型,同样应用于 Sivers 等其他激光器厂商。 鉴于 InP CW DFB 产能的广泛短缺和需求失衡。

    英文原文

    I think it’s a good time to revisit $SIVE ~$427m/yr midpoint capacity revenue modeled projections. Given recent industry earnings: > $AAOI cited +20-40% demand imbalance for transceivers (with lasers as the bottleneck). > $MTSI saying many "Customers are coming to us with urgency due to the general supply shortage of indium phosphide DFB lasers" (in other product lines) > US proposal ban on new Chinese optical transceivers (Innolight/Eoptolink) > AOI no meaningful participation in first-gen CPO deployments due to lasers being allocated toward transceivers. The read through is that it’s possible to apply the same capacity-demand absorption modeling applying to $AAOI, but for other laser players like Sivers too. Given the widespread shortage and demand imbalance for InP CW DFB capacity.

  10. 方法论 $AAOI$AXTI$COHR$LITE$MU$SPCX

    市场在瓶颈间轮动,基本面未变仅估值波动,建议理性看待。

    是的,我依然看好存储芯片,如 $MU / 三星。正如我之前所说,市场倾向于在瓶颈之间轮动。本周看来,光子学领域从 $AXTI 到 $LITE 再次成为焦点。关键在于……主要变化的是股价,随后辅以一些叙事和零星更新。对于光子学:> 在7月的下跌中,我们已经知道 $COHR / $LITE 的激光器已完全售罄,未来两年无货。> 我们从上季度财报电话会中已知 $AAOI 的需求失衡。7月崩盘期间,除了清算后的挂牌价外,基本面没有任何恶化。然而,当 $AAOI 跌至 $75 或 $AXTI 跌至 $35 时,许多人称其为“骗局”……但当它们涨回 $140 或 $80 时,人们又看多了,尽管光模块/磷化铟(InP)衬底瓶颈未变,甚至可能更糟(例如美国拟禁止中国新光模块,需求预测上调)。对于存储:我目睹大量散户投降,但这些人一个月前在 $MU 签署16份SCA并给出卓越指引时曾极度看多。或曾庆祝三星拥有全球最高营业利润。这里有一些更新,例如 Rubin Ultra 的存储优化(Nvidia每代都在追求),价格不再极端高于预期。但在当前价格下,营业利润相对于市值简直荒谬,尤其是存储成为结构性需求。明年的需求失衡应该更严重。人们倾向于在板块下跌时投降并跟随叙事(例如伊朗战争期间的氦气/LNG),即使瓶颈或基本面未变(例如 $SPCX Elon 财报电话会重申存储紧张)。我不能告诉别人该做什么:但 $140 的 $AAOI 和 $75 的 $AAOI 是同一家公司。市值 $1.5T 的三星和 $980B 的三星是同一家公司。只是估值和叙事(通常是噪音)在变,市场在板块间轮动。

    英文原文

    Yes, I'm still bullish on memory like $MU / Samsung. As I said earlier, markets tend to rotate from bottleneck to bottleneck. This week it looks $AXTI to $LITE in the photonics sector is the focus again. The thing is... the primary thing that changed are the stock prices, followed by some narratives + updates sprinkled in here and there. For photonics: > We already knew $COHR / $LITE lasers were completely sold out for the next 2 years during July's drop. > We knew about demand imbalance from $AAOI from last quarter's earnings calls. Nothing deteriorated fundamentally during July's crash, other than listed price after liquidations. Yet tons of people called $AAOI a "scam" when it dropped to $75, or $AXTI a "scam" on its drop to $35... But are bullish again at $140 or $80, when the transciver/InP substrate bottleneck hasn't changed at all, but maybe even got worse... (eg. draft for US ban on new china optical transceivers, scale up demand projections) For Memory: I'm witnessing a lot of retail capitulation, but the same people I'm seeing were mega bullish after $MU signed 16 SCAs and gave exceptional projections a month ago. Or were celebrating Samsung having the highest operating profit in the world. There's updates here and there eg. Rubin Ultra with memory optimizations (which Nvidia strives for every generation), with prices no longer being hiked way above expectations to the extreme. But the operating income relative to MC is just absurd around current prices, especially memory becomes structural. And the demand imbalance should be even worse next year. People tend to capitulate and follow narratives when a sector drops (eg. Helium/LNG back in Iran war), even if the bottleneck or fundamental situation hasn't really changed much (eg. $SPCX Elon earnings call reiterating memory tightness). I can't tell others what to to do: But $AAOI at $140 and $AAOI at $75 are the same company. Samsung at a $1.5T MC and Samsung at a $980B MC are the same company. Just valuations and narratives (often noise) change, and markets rotate from sector to sector.

  11. 供应链分析 $AAOI$AXTI$MTSI

    激光器及InP衬底未来2-3年或现短缺,CPO扩产加剧瓶颈。

    @SL2056 @Sofigoodboy 好问题!这是逐年变化的,很难从2026年预测到2030年的短缺,但这绝对是一个结构性的多年需求周期。 我想指出的是,激光器(lasers)在特定领域很可能在未来2-3年面临极端短缺,尤其是在共封装光学(CPO)规模化初期至少如此。 例如,CPO激光器市场所需的产能“比今天大8到10倍”,并补充说:“我认为……完全没影响,因为需求远大于全球产能。” 至于磷化铟(InP)衬底,$AAOI 表示2027年没问题,但由于其关键性希望组建合资企业。 $AXTI 看起来只是逐年倍增产能,具体取决于你问谁。 一些台湾外延片(epiwafer)厂商称InP衬底面临极端短缺,而它们正是激光器厂商的上游。 你的激光器厂商如 $AAOI 和 $MTSI 表示他们没问题。 无论如何,我们看到这转化为 $AXTI 的收入拐点(2027年约1.3亿美元/季度),但我预计鉴于其市场地位,平均售价(ASP)一路上涨。

    英文原文

    @SL2056 @Sofigoodboy Good question! This something year-by-year, can't really predict shortages into 2030 from 2026, but it's definitely a structural multi-year demand cycle. Something that I want to flag is that it looks like lasers in specific would likely have extreme shortages for the next 2-3 years, especially during CPO scale up at the very least. eg. CPO laser market would require capacity "8 to 10x bigger compared to today," and added, "I think… no effect at all because the demand is much bigger than the worldwide capacity." As for InP substrates, $AAOI said they were fine for 2027 calendar year but wanted to form JVs because of likely how critical they are since. $AXTI looked like they were just multiplying capacity year after year and depends on who you ask.. Some of the Taiwan epiwafer players say it's extreme shortages for InP substrates, when they feed into your laser players. Your laser players like $AAOI and $MTSI say they're fine. Regardless, we see that convert into revenue inflection points with AXTI anyway (~$130m/quarter in 2027), but I'm expecting ASP to be hiked along the way given their positioning.

  12. 供应链分析 $AAOI$MTSI$MXL$SMTC

    AAOI财报揭示DSP/TIA瓶颈利好同行,且营收增速惊人。

    以下是 $AAOI 财报的一些要点摘要: - 他们也指出了数字信号处理(DSP)和收发器接口放大器(TIA)的瓶颈,这对 $MXL、$SMTC 和 $MTSI 等公司来说是积极的行业利好信号。 - 关于营收增长,他们预计第四季度营收将超过 5 亿美元,这种增长速度简直令人难以置信。 供参考: 第二季度:1.919 亿美元 第三季度:约 2.55 亿-2.9 亿美元 第四季度:5 亿美元以上 到 2027 年中:季度营收年化运行率约 14.1 亿美元 这些光通信玩家强劲的营收爬坡速度总是让我印象深刻。

    英文原文

    Some more TLDR takeaways from $AAOI ER: - They also flagged DSP and TIA bottlenecks, which is a positive industry read through for names like $MXL, then $SMTC and $MTSI. - For revenue growth, they're expecting more than $500 million revenue Q4, which is absurd growth. For reference: Q2: $191.9M Q3: ~$255M-$290M Q4: $500M+ By mid-2027: ~$1.41B quarterly revenue run-rate Always impressed by the revenue ramp from some of these optical players.

  13. 供应链分析 $AAOI$AMD$LITE$SIVE

    Rosenblatt 光通信调研精准,AAOI 财报证实中国 CPO 激光器落后。

    我通常喜欢调侃卖方分析师,但 Rosenblatt 对光通信标的的渠道调研(Channel Checks)确实非常出色,他们的报告是我少数愿意讨论的。$AAOI、$LITE、$SIVE 以及激光板块已开始在其预估的时间窗口内恢复。例如,上个月他们提到:“多位空头表示他们可能会在 7 月底和 8 月初平仓”。他们可能误判了 $AMD 会是 $AAOI 的首个共封装光学(CPO) 客户……因为 AAOI 表示他们将缺席第一代 CPO(也许是未来几代?)。但他们关于中国 CPO 激光器定位(例如落后 2-3 年)的许多观点,今天被 AAOI 的财报逐字证实了。

    英文原文

    I usually make fun of sellside, but Rosenblatt has pretty goated channel checks on optical names, and their reports are one of the few I like talking about. $AAOI, $LITE, $SIVE, and the laser party has started to recover around the est. timing windows. eg. last month: "Multiple short sellers told them they will likely close their positions... late July and early August". They might have missed that they believed $AMD would be $AAOI's first CPO customer... since AAOI said they would be missing from first-gen CPO (maybe future gen?) But lot of their talking points about China CPO laser positioning (eg. 2-3 years behind) got corroborated word-for-word from AAOI earnings today.

  14. 供应链分析 $AAOI

    AAOI光模块供不应求,利好小型CPO激光器厂商。

    @pjtesus 这是因为 $AAOI 的 800G/1.6T 光模块(optical transceivers)已经存在巨大的 20-40% 供需失衡…… 他们无法生产足够的产品来满足需求。这是一件好事。 但无法满足所有需求,意味着较小的共封装光学(CPO) 激光器玩家存在市场机会。

    英文原文

    @pjtesus It's because $AAOI already has a massive 20-40% demand imbalance for their 800G/1.6T optical transceivers... They can't make enough to satisfy demand. That's a positive thing. But not being able to fulfill all demand, means there's market opportunities for smaller CPO laser players.

  15. 供应链分析 $AAOI$AMD$COHR$LITE$NVDA

    AAOI缺席CPO部署揭示产能瓶颈,暗示其他CPO玩家价值被低估。

    @00m00oo 我对 $AAOI 极度看好,它是我的核心持仓之一? 但当 AOI 表示因产能不足而不参与第一代共封装光学(CPO)部署时,背后有无数问题需要拆解。 1. 独立连续波分布反馈激光器(CW DFB)产能,比市场预期的更少。 2. 合格的 CPO 激光器玩家,比市场预期的更少。 3. 我记得 Rosenblatt 曾认为 $AAOI 会是 $AMD 的第一个 CPO 客户,但情况可能已变... 而且由于 $LITE 和 $COHR 站在 $NVDA 阵营且未来两年订单已售罄... 其他一些 CPO 玩家可能比人们认为的更有价值。

    英文原文

    @00m00oo I'm extremely bullish on $AAOI, it's one of my top holdings? But there's an unholy amount of things to unpack when AOI said they're not participating in first-gen CPO deployments because there's not enough capacity. 1. Independent CW DFB capacity, even less than markets thought. 2. Qualified CPO laser players, even less than markets thought. 3. I remember Rosenblatt thought $AAOI would be $AMD's first CPO customer, but might not be the case anymore... And since $LITE and $COHR are in camp $NVDA and sold out for next 2 years... Some other CPO players might be more valuable than others think.

  16. AAOI财报揭示CPO激光器产能瓶颈,利好少数西方厂商,中国技术落后数年。

    哇,$AAOI 的财报中对于 $SIVE 及其他激光器玩家来说,利好一个接一个。 1. $AAOI 并未实质性参与第一代共封装光学(CPO)部署。 “我们根本无法生产足够的[CPO激光器]来参与他们当前的一代[CPO]部署,因为产能根本不够。我们必须优先保障自有光模块的激光器供应。” 因此,第一代CPO激光器的部署范围可能会进一步缩小,仅限于$SIVE、$LITE、$AVGO和$COHR等西方厂商。 如果$AAOI不得不拒绝更多客户,独立的CPO连续波(CW)激光器产能将变得更有价值。 还要记得Trendforce曾提到$AMD签署了CW长期协议(LTA)?$COHR/$LITE已与$NVDA签署了产能协议…… 我原以为是$AAOI,但他们可能出局了。$MTSI在早期CPO参与中也不显眼(除了NPO外财报未提及,且从Ayar网站移除)。 所以我在想$AMD在Helios项目中会与谁合作(例如Sivers+Ayar现在更可能是候选者)? 顺便说一句,这对$AAOI并非看空,因为他们光模块业务需求旺盛。只是对少数有产能的合格CPO激光器厂商更加看多。 2. 磷化铟(InP)激光器/光模块的需求失衡与瓶颈。 AOI CEO的话某种程度上证实了这一点:“客户需求比扩建后的产能高出20%-40%。” “我们几乎每周都从几家大客户那里收到这种需求。激光器目前是光模块业务最大的瓶颈。” 3. 中国在CPO波分复用(DWDM)规格激光器方面落后数年。 我之前在渠道调研CPO竞争时曾覆盖过这一点。 但$AAOI确认中国“至少落后两三年甚至更久”才能拥有CPO激光器,这极大地印证了西方激光器在CPO激光器卡脖子环节上的防御性地位。 总结: - CW激光器和光模块需求严重失衡。 - $AAOI因产能限制未进入第一代CPO(对$AAOI不算看空,因其光模块需求旺盛,但对$SIVE等少数有产能的独立厂商更是利好)。 - 中国在CPO激光器方面落后数年。

    英文原文

    Wow, there's gem after gem in $AAOI earnings for $SIVE + other laser player readthrough. 1. AAOI not meaningfully participating in CPO first-gen deployments. "We just can’t make enough of them [CPO lasers] to be involved in their current first-generation [CPO] deployments because there’s just not enough capacity. We have to prioritize our ability to make lasers for our own transceivers first" So first-gen CPO laser deployments, might even be narrowed down further for Western players like $SIVE, $LITE, $AVGO, and $COHR. And independent CPO CW laser capacity became more valuable if $AAOI had to turn away more customers... Also remember Trendforce was talking about $AMD singing CW LTAs? $COHR / $LITE have capacity signed with $NVDA ... I thought it would be $AAOI, but they might be out of the equation. $MTSI also doesn't look meaningful with early CPO participation (eg. no mention in ER aside from NPO, and removal from Ayar website). So I wonder who players like $AMD is going to go with for Helios (eg. Sivers + Ayar more likely candidate now)? Btw, this is not bearish AAOI because they have too much demand for optical transceiver business. Just more bullish on the existing few qualified CPO laser names that have capacity. 2. Demand imbalance and bottleneck for InP lasers / optical transceivers. AOI's CEO stated kinda supported that when they said: "The customer demand is 20%-40% higher" than expanded built out capacity. "We are getting this kind of demand from several big customers almost every week. Lasers are the biggest bottleneck right now for the transceiver business" 3. China being years away from having CPO DWDM specification lasers. I covered this earlier when looking at CPO competition from channel checks. But AAOI confirming that China is "easily at least two, three years or even longer from having CPO lasers is incredible tread through on defensibility Western laser positioning in the CPO laser chokepoint. TLDR: - High demand imbalance for CW lasers and optical transceivers. - $AAOI not in first-gen CPO due to capacity constraints (not exactly bearish AAOI because they have too much demand for their optical transciver business, but even better news for the few independent players with capacity coming online like $SIVE) - China years behind in CPO lasers.

  17. 供应链分析 $AAOI$LITE$SIVE

    InP激光器产能严重不足,看好新增独立产能标的。

    @_king142 $LITE 首席执行官表示,即使其 5 座磷化铟(InP)激光器晶圆厂投产,出货量仍将低于客户需求 30% 以上。(甚至比当前的内存短缺更严重) $AAOI 也表达了类似的观点,缺口在 20-40% 之间。 我猜测 InP 衬底和激光器都将成为 2027 年最严重的瓶颈之一。 这就是为什么我非常看重任何新增的独立产能,无论是 $SIVE 与 Win 的合作还是 $AAOI。

    英文原文

    @_king142 $LITE CEO said even as their 5 InP laser fabs come online, shipments would be 30%+ below customer demand. (and worse than the current memory shortage) $AAOI said something similiar with a 20-40% figure. My guess is that InP substrates and lasers both will be one of the most severe bottlenecks in 2027. Which is why I place a lot of value on any independent capacity that comes online whether it's $SIVE with Win or $AAOI.

  18. 供应链分析 $AAOI$AVGO$COHR$JBL$LITE$SIVE

    AAOI财报验证光模块需求远超供应,产能爬坡中,看好板块传导。

    以下是关于 $AAOI 财报的简要要点: - 预计超大规模客户将在未来几周内完成 1.6T 产品的全面认证(有助于收入爬坡 #2,时间线) - 继续认为 AOI 将拥有美国最大的 AI 数据中心光收发器产能(在竞争对手可能被禁时期重申雄心) - 预计磷化铟(InP)产能设施将于 2027 年初投产(进一步爬坡的时间线参考) - 总产能接近每月 20 万颗/单位,年底 800G/1.6T 达 65 万颗/单位。2027 年底达 93 万颗/单位(这是我想要看到的爬坡) - “增加外部光源(ELSFP)的制造产能。这是用于共封装光学(CPO)的”。我们预计今年晚些时候及 2027 年扩大生产,最终在 2028 年达到每月约 40 万件(需要时间将其建模为收入) - “如前所述,我们多年来一直内部制造激光器。这使我们避免了影响行业其他公司的短缺”(CW/EML 激光器短缺期间的垂直整合看多逻辑) - 我们相信未来 CPO 将继续推动对高功率激光器的需求增加(CPO 板块论点验证) - “长期目标是将非公认会计准则毛利率恢复到 40% 左右” - “第二季度末现金等价物总计 5.088 亿美元” 我需要再次确认 ATM 是否完成 - “我们交付收入的能力,特别是 800G 产品,目前受限于我们的生产能力”“如果我们能生产更多,我们现在就能发货更多” 需求 > 供应验证。 - “大部分增加的产能将在美国。即便如此,让我说,正如我一直强调的,这还不足以应对客户需求。客户需求高出 20%-40%。” 整个板块的光子学需求验证惊人,阅读 $LITE, $SIVE / $JBL 等公司的传导效应令人惊叹。 - “在未来两三年内不会,尤其是需求如此之大。好吧?即使结合 AI,$LITE, $COHR, $AVGO 加在一起,未来几年满足客户需求仍然非常困难” 更多光通信板块需求验证。 - CPO 时间线:“如果你说的是 CPO 市场的高产量制造商,我会说是明年第三季度末左右”以及“我们已与至少五家客户密切合作” 如果你关心当前财报(我并没有仔细看) 营收:1.91 亿美元 vs 1.90 亿美元 每股收益:0.06 美元 vs 0.02 美元 简而言之:激光器 + 光通信板块需求传导非凡。某种程度上支持 Lumentum CEO 关于激光器短缺比内存短缺更严重的说法。 2027 年产能爬坡按计划进行。要映射拐点期与时间线,大约在明年年初,正如他们之前的财报电话会议所述。 AAOI 现在拥有客户。限制在于制造足够的激光器和收发器。

    英文原文

    Just some TLDR notes on $AAOI earnings: - Expects full qualification of 1.6T products by their hyperscaler customer within next couple of weeks (helpful revenue ramp #2, timelines) - Continues to believe that AOI will have the largest AI DC transceiver production capacity in the US (reiterating ambitions during a time when their competitors might get banned) - Expects facilities toward InP capacity to come online in early 2027 (timeline FYI in terms of further ramp) - Total capacity is approaching 200,000/u per month, EOY 650,000/u per month of 800g/1.6t. EOY 2027, 930,000/u (this is the ramp i want to see) - "increase our manufacturing capacity for our external light source or ELSFP. That's for co-packaged optics or CPO". we anticipate ramping production later this year and into 2027, ultimately culminating in about 400,000 pieces per month in 2028 (need some time to model this into revenue) - "As we have mentioned before, we've been manufacturing lasers internally for many years. This has allowed us to avoid some of the shortages that have affected others in the industry" (vertical integration bull case during CW/EML laser shortages) - We believe that in the future, CPO will continue to drive increased demand for high-power lasers (thesis validation on CPO sector) - "to our long-term objective of returning non-GAAP gross margins to around 40%" - "We ended the second quarter with $508.8 million in total cash equivalents" I need to double check if the ATM finished or not - "our ability to deliver revenue in general, and specifically when it comes to 800G products, is limited by our production capacity right now" "If we could produce more, we could ship more right now" Demand > Supply validation. - "Most of the increased capacity will be in U.S. Even so, let me say that, like I keep emphasizing, that is not good enough for the customer demand. The customer demand is 20%-40% higher." Unholy photonics demand validation across the whole sector, read through for $LITE, $SIVE / $JBL, and others is amazing. - "Not in the next two, three years, especially the demand is so big. Okay? Even combined AI, $LITE, $COHR, $AVGO all together, it's still very tough to meet the customer demand in the next few years" More optical sector demand validation. - CPO Timelines: "If you're talking about really high volume manufacturer [for CPO market], I would say more like the late Q3 next year" and "We have been working very close with at least five customer" If you care about current earnings (which I'm not really looking at closely) Revenue: $191M vs. $190m EPS: $.06 vs. $.02 TLDR: Extraordinary demand across the laser + optical sector read through. Kinda supporting Lumentum CEO statement that laser shortage is worse than memory shortages. 2027 capacity ramp on track. To map inflection period with timelines, would be around early next year, as stated in their previous earnings call. AAOI has the customers now. Limitation is making enough lasers and transceivers.

  19. 杂谈 $AAOI$AMD$TSM

    调侃AAOI名称难读,无人日常提及。

    我依然坚信,在现实生活中没人知道怎么发音或谈论 $AAOI。它比 $TSM 或 $AMD 多一个字母。而且没人会对朋友说:“哇,我喜欢应用光电(Applied Optoelectronics)!”

    英文原文

    I remain convinced nobody knows how to pronounce or talk about $AAOI in real life. It’s one letter too long to say $TSM or $AMD. And nobody ever says to a friend“Wow, I like applied optoelectronics!”

  20. 供应链分析 $AAOI$COHR$JBL$LITE$SIVE

    禁令利好西方光模块厂商,AAOI等1.6T+玩家受益。

    @Lseperlee 对我来说,$AAOI 是 2027 年上半年末的放量玩家,因为大约那时他们将达到每月 4.71 亿美元营收预测的拐点。近期起草的禁止英诺赛科(Innolight)等公司新光模块的光模块禁令,增加了 $AAOI、$SIVE/$JBL、$LITE、$COHR 等公司在 1.6T+ 项目上的权重。尤其是如果该禁令在 2026 年最终确定。由于可能会出现价格上涨,且需求将更集中于少数西方玩家产能。

    英文原文

    @Lseperlee $AAOI is an end of H1 2027 volume ramp player for me, since around then is when they hit inflection point of $471m/month revenue projections. Recent drafted ban on new optical transceivers coming from Innolight and others, increase weight on players like AAOI, $SIVE / $JBL, $LITE, $COHR for their 1.6T+ programs as well. Especially if finalized in 2026. Since there's likely going to be price hikes, and more demand concentration over capacity from the select few Western players.

  21. 供应链分析 $AAOI$LITE$SIVE

    特朗普拟禁中国光模块,利好西方供应链分化。

    西方供应链迎来了一个非常实质性的催化剂,涉及 $AAOI、$SIVE/Jabil、$LITE 和 Coherent:特朗普政府正在起草一项禁令,禁止新的中国光模块(Optical Transceivers)和直流(DC)设备。这可能会打击中国的中际旭创(Innolight)、新易盛(Eoptolink)以及其他中国光互连(Optical Interconnect)供应链。“该机构将禁止所有新型光模块的进口,然后豁免许多非中国供应商的限制。”我们可能会看到供应链出现更大的分化,西方玩家的重要性将进一步提升。

    英文原文

    A very material catalyst came about for Western supply chains from $AAOI, $SIVE / Jabil, to $LITE and Coherent: The Trump administration is drafting a ban of new Chinese optical transceivers and DC devices. Which would likely hit China’s Innolight, Eoptolink, and other Chinese optical interconnect supply chains. "The agency would ban all imports of new transceiver models ​and then exempt many ⁠non-Chinese suppliers from the restrictions" We'll likely see a larger bifurcation of supply chains with even greater importance put on Western players.

  22. 个股论点 $AAOI$COHR$LITE$SIVE

    AI激光器供应危机加剧,验证AAOI等标的瓶颈逻辑。

    $LITE CEO Michael Hurlston 在 RAISE 峰会上警告称,AI 数据中心(AI DCs)用磷化铟(InP)激光器的供应缺口: 正面临比存储芯片更严重的供应链危机。 凭借 Lumentum 的 5 座 InP 晶圆厂,其出货量将比客户需求低 30% 以上。 这在目前的电吸收调制激光器(EMLs)上尤为明显,但随着共封装光学(CPO)的推进,已扩展至连续波(CW)激光器。 我一直看好 $AAOI、$SIVE、$LITE 和 $COHR 带来的激光器卡脖子+瓶颈逻辑。很高兴这一论点开始得到验证。

    英文原文

    $LITE CEO Michael Hurlston at the RAISE Summit warned that the supply gap for InP lasers for AI DCs: Is facing a more severe supply chain crisis than memory. And with Lumentum's 5 InP fabs, shipments would be more than 30%+ below customer demand. This is especially visible with EMLs today but is already expanding to CW, especially as CPO ramps. I've always been a fan of the laser chokepoint + bottleneck from $AAOI, $SIVE, $LITE, and $COHR. And glad this thesis is starting to see validation.

  23. 供应链分析 $AAOI$AMD$FORM$SIVE

    博主澄清CPO延迟谣言,认为亚洲股错杀,看好MSSCorp及早期受益股。

    @Erick_P23 核心逻辑更偏向于共封装光学(CPO)的规模化,预计其复杂性将使MSSCorp成为检测良率方面的垄断型瓶颈(他们声称目标市场份额为90%)。尽管这些技术也可用于其他领域。 $FORM 的产能爬坡早了很多,所以下次财报中营收可能会开始显现? 无论如何,亚洲概念股因CPO时间表延迟的报道而大幅抛售,但我通过$AMD 大会上的渠道核实发现该报道不实。 我认为我的观点没有改变,更多的是在等待2027年。 像Shunsin这样拥有更多确认的规模化交换机出货量,以及像 $AAOI / $SIVE 这样的激光概念股,其产能爬坡要早得多。在我看来,这只是时间线的问题,以及市场何时愿意对此进行定价。

    英文原文

    @Erick_P23 Thesis is more for CPO scale up expecting complexity making make MSSCorp a monopoly-type chokepoint over inspection yields (they were claiming 90% market share target). Although they can be used for other segments. $FORM ramped a lot earlier, so maybe will revenue would start to appear in next earnings? Regardless, Asian names sold off extremely hard on CPO timeline delay report that I found to be incorrect with my channel checks at the $AMD conference. Don't think my views have changed, it's moreso waiting for 2027. Names with more confirmed scale-out switch volumes like Shunsin + laser names like $AAOI / $SIVE ramp a lot earlier. It's just timelines in my view and when markets want to price that in.

  24. 博主分享近期因财报或市场波动对多只AI供应链个股的加仓操作及资金调配逻辑。

    @RockyKh49376975 嗯,我个人在40多美元时加仓了$AMKR,因为我认为在$NVDA 15亿美元交易+$TSM 10年协议后,财报后跌这么多令人惊讶。不过它更多是2028年的标的,尽管2027年有独立的爬坡计划。- 在Foci跌至400时做了成本平均($TSM COUPE共封装光学+ $NVDA的主要FAU供应商,其他财报如$FORM显示COUPE现在开始爬坡)。财报后也加仓了一些$XFAB,因为他们验证了CPO共封装光学+800V曝光,不过可能需要等待一段时间。在13 EU末日暴跌时加仓了$LPK,GCS不会消失,我认为由于Absolics延迟,出货量爬坡仅推迟了一个季度,我愿意等3个月。CoPoS、三星等应该在2027年推动更多需求。在OE Solutions跌至约14,000韩元时加仓,认为韩国领先的EML公司且拥有独立InP晶圆厂市值仅约1.1亿美元很奇怪。- Win Semi等名字对我非常有吸引力,但可惜没有足够资金在不使用高杠杆的情况下加仓。可能想逐步建仓$SIVE和$AAOI,因为那是我的两个最爱。鉴于Unitree IPO还有3周左右,正在关注$CCXI的机会,该上市应该像$SPCX的光环效应一样提振人形机器人板块。TLDR:只是资金调配,我个人的风险管理。标的与之前相同。

    英文原文

    @RockyKh49376975 Hmm, I personally added $AMKR in the $40's since I thought it was surprising it dropped that much after ER, even after $NVDA $1.5B deal + $TSM 10Y agreement. It's more of a 2028 name though, though they have separate ramps in 2027. - Did some cost averaging on names like Foci on drop to 400 (leading FAU supplier to $TSM COUPE + $NVDA, COUPE shows signs of ramp now from other ERs like $FORM). Added some $XFAB too after earnings since they verified CPO + 800V exposure, might be a bit of waiting though. Added $LPK on the 13 EU doomdrop, GCS isn't going anywhere, think volume ramp just got delayed a quarter because of Absolics delay and I'm fine waiting 3 months. CoPoS, Samsung, and others should drive demand more in 2027. And added OE Solutions on drop to ~14,000 KRW, thought it was strange Korea's leading EML company with independent InP fabs was only worth ~$110M MC. - Names like Win Semi + others are really really compelling to me but just dont have enough capital to add sadly without going on heavy margin. Probably want to scale into $SIVE and $AAOI more since those are my two favorites. And looking at $CCXI opportunities given Unitree IPO is around 3 weeks, that listing should boost humanoid/robotics sector a bit similar to the $SPCX halo effect. TLDR: Just moving capital around, my own personal risk management. Same names as before.

  25. 个股论点 $AAOI$NBIS$POET

    博主认为当前估值极具吸引力,重申AAOI和NBIS的营收拐点预期。

    @WangHou4128 我不认为我(或任何人)能准确预测底部。否则如果他们真知道,早就做每周期权了。 不过很难想象某些标的会跌得更低,比如 $AAOI 的市值已接近1倍年化远期营收。$POET 跌幅巨大,其市值约10.8亿美元,而现金就有约8亿美元。 总体而言,即使 Leopond 也认为当前估值极具吸引力,所以他正在募资买入下跌。不过谁说得准呢? 但从中长期来看,就我个人的投资逻辑而言,我预计一旦营收预测兑现为盈利,行情就会展开。 我重申 $AAOI 的营收拐点在2027年上半年末……$NBIS 的营收拐点在2026年第四季度,等等,这是我的个人估算。 当然,在此之前会有大量波动。

    英文原文

    @WangHou4128 I don't think I (or anyone else) can accurately call the bottom. Otherwise they would just do weekly options if they knew. It's hard to see some of the names drop any lower though, like $AAOI is close to 1x annualized fwd revenue/MC. $POET dropped so much that it's roughly ~$800m cash to $1.08B MC. In general, even Leopond finds current valuations extremely attractive, so he's raising more to buy the drop. Who knows though? But medium-long term, for my own thesis, I expect them to play out once revenue projections hit earnings. I've reiterated end of H1 2027 for $AAOI in terms of revenue inflection.... H4 2026 for $NBIS revenue inflection, and so on for my own ests. Of course, lot of volatility in between then.

  26. 个股论点 $AAOI$LITE

    AI去杠杆冲击AAOI,质疑其估值并对比LITE。

    @nicomejia_ 目前全球范围内正在进行无差别的AI去杠杆化,$AAOI 是受影响的高贝塔(High-Beta)标的之一。如果他们在2027年(基于每月4.71亿美元的预测)实现56亿美元的年化营收,却依然维持63亿美元的公司市值,我个人至少会感到惊讶。$LITE 目前的年化营收约为32.3亿美元,但市值已达480亿美元(尽管利润率更高)。

    英文原文

    @nicomejia_ Global indiscriminate AI deleveraging right now, $AAOI is one of the high-beta names affected. I'd personally be surprised to say the least if they do $5.6B annualized revenue in 2027 (off of $471m/month projections), and remain a $6.3B company. $LITE annualized right now is ~$3.23B and they're a $48B company (but higher margins)

  27. 博主认为AI需求加速信号明确,短期波动属去杠杆,看好光互连及存储板块。

    我个人认为这是极短期的去杠杆行为,导致许多个股超跌。 - $BE 和 $TER 公布了超预期的业绩,Bloom 报告营收同比增长 166% + 利润率扩张 + 上调 2026 年指引... Teradyne 报告营收同比增长 104%,每股收益增长 300%+。 - 中国领先的光学玩家公布了惊人的初步财报,对西方光子学板块有极强的映射效应。 - 我认为财报季倾向于提醒市场 AI 加速仍在继续。我预计 $LITE、$SNDK / SK Hynix 以及板块龙头 ERs 将继续这一趋势。 - 但感觉市场更多是在奖励现有的加速,而非基于短期修正(如 $AMKR 所见)的未来一年增长。 - 总之,对我跟踪的主题来说看起来非常积极。 - 然后你有 $GOOGL 资本支出上调至 1950-2050 亿美元,这通常是超大规模云厂商最大的 AI 需求信号。 - 预测市场显示下次 FOMC 会议利率不变的概率为 77%。特朗普政府周一呼吁美联储降息。 - 所以今年三次加息的恐惧似乎有些夸大。 - 从 DUV 到 $CXMT 产能过剩的中国恐惧也被极度夸大。我们在每个行业都见过这种情况,直到人们记住激光或 HBM 瓶颈存在是有原因的。 - 就个人想法而言,看到所有东西一起涨跌是不健康的,尤其是这些主题。但我个人并不担心,因为我对我的持仓有充分信心,特别是像 $SIVE 或 $AAOI 这样的光互连领域。 - $META 计算和 $GOOGL GCP 利润率/增长显示出对 $NBIS 及类似新云业务模式的需求增加。 - $META 及其他超大规模云厂商关于与 $SNDK 和三星/SK Hynix、$MU 的长期协议(LTAs)的笔记指向结构性内存需求。 - 可以一直列举下去... - 但当 Jim Cramer 告诉每个保证金交易员在开盘时“全部卖出”,而新闻说存在 AI 泡沫时。 - 我讨厌别人说“它在跌所以卖出”。我相信重要的是看加速的营收/每股收益增长。如果营收加速与超大规模云厂商资本支出保持一致,那么该逻辑依然成立。 - 总之:我看到了 AI 需求/营收加速的迹象,超大规模云厂商资本支出是最重要的跟踪指标之一。 - 我猜我们会看到该主题广泛复苏。但我无法预测具体发生在哪一小时、哪一天或哪一周。

    英文原文

    I personally see it as extreme short term deleveraging that overshot many individual names. - $BE to $TER reported blowout results, with Bloom reporting 166% Y/Y rev growth + expanding margins + raised 2026 guidance... Teradyne reported 104% Y/Y revenue growth with 300%+ EPS growth. Your leading optical players over in China reported amazing preliminary earnings + extremely strong read through for the Western photonics sector. Think earnings season tend to remind markets about continued AI acceleration. I'm expecting $LITE, $SNDK / SK Hynix, and sector leader ERs to continue that trend. But it does feel like markets are rewarding existing acceleration more rather than future growth a year out over near-term revisions as seen with $AMKR. But as a TLDR, looks very positive for the themes I'm tracking. - Then you have $GOOGL capex raised to $195-$205B, which is typically the biggest AI demand signal from hyperscalers. - 77% 0bps change est. next FOMC decision from prediction markets. Trump administration on Monday called for the Fed to lower interest rates. So your 3x rate hikes fears this year seem kinda overblown. - Chinese fears from DUV to $CXMT overflooding are extremely overblown as well. We see this with every sector from time to time until people remember that lasers or HBM bottlenecks for a reason. As for personal thoughts, it was unhealthy seeing everything rise up or down together, especially with these themes. But I'm personally not worried since I have full conviction in my names, especially optical interconnects like $SIVE or $AAOI. $META compute and $GOOGL GCP margins/growth shows increasing demand for $NBIS and similar neocloud business models. $META + other hyperscaler notes around LTAs with $SNDK and Samsung/SK Hynix, $MU point to structural memory demand. Can go on and on... But when you have Jim Cramer telling every margined DC trader to "sell everything" at market open and news saying there's an AI bubble. I do hate it when others say "it's dropping so sell". My belief is that the important thing to look is accelerating revenue/EPS growth. And if that thesis stays in-tact with revenue acceleration in line with hyperscaler capex. TLDR: I see signs of AI demand / revenue acceleration, hyperscaler capex is one of the most important things to track. And my guess is that we'll see the theme recover broadly. But I can't predict what hour, day, or week that happens.

  28. 供应链分析 $AAOI$COHR$LITE$SIVE

    澄清AMD是AAOI首批CPO客户,并指出LITE/COHR/SIVE为CPO激光器核心标的。

    @Thomus0x 呃,Rosenblatt 6月30日的研报指出 AMD 是 $AAOI 共封装光学(CPO) 最可能的首批客户。我不会说他们离实现还遥遥无期。 根据摩根士丹利最近的研报,$LITE / $COHR / $SIVE 目前在 CPO 激光器可见性方面看起来就是你最看好的前三大标的。

    英文原文

    @Thomus0x eh, Rosenblatt June 30 note identified AMD as the likely first $AAOI CPO customer. I wouldn't quite say they aren't remotely close. $LITE / $COHR / $SIVE just look like your top 3 right now in terms of CPO laser visibility per the recent Morgan Stanley note.

  29. 供应链分析 $AAOI$JBL$LITE$SIVE

    SIVE CEO称可插拔模块将长期存在,CPO为行业方向,激光器产能是瓶颈。

    不完全适用于 $AAOI(他们也在研发共封装光学(CPO),只是商业化进度稍落后)。 最近有一档名为“市场洞察:光子学与AI”的播客采访了 $SIVE 的CEO。 最有趣的观点是: “可插拔光模块在未来10年仍将存在”。 近期有很多关于CPO和RNG/MRC优化将蚕食可插拔模块总可寻址市场(TAM)的论点,但看来可插拔模块将长期存在。 而且未来会有多种架构路径并行(CEO也表示,除了CPO,非平面光学(NPO)在未来5年也是主要机会)。 至于挑战:Vickram表示,制造产能和原材料供应是主要瓶颈。这可能指的是上游连续波(CW)激光器扩产面临的现有瓶颈。 从播客来看,重点似乎放在可插拔市场,因为其短期TAM更大(考虑到 $JBL 和其他玩家,这可以理解),而CPO则是行业发展的北极星指标。 因此,如果 $SIVE 能通过并购获取更多可插拔光收发器IP(就像 $LITE 收购Cloud Light那样),可能会很有趣。 但简而言之: 未来路径多样,可插拔模块将长期存在,CPO似乎是行业发展的北极星方向。 感觉鉴于行业需求增长速度快于所有供应商的集体产能,合格的激光器供应商都有生存空间。

    英文原文

    Not exactly for $AAOI (they're working on CPO too, just a little further behind in commercialization). There's a podcast that featured the $SIVE CEO recently called: "Market Insights: Photonics & AI". Most interesting take was: "Pluggables will be around for the next 10 years". There's a lot of CPO + RNG/MRC optimization TAM cannablization arguments for pluggables recently, but looks like it's here to stay. And that there's going to be multiple architecture paths going forward (CEO also NPO alongside CPO as an major opportunity in the next 5 years). As for challenges: Vickram stated manufacturing capacity + availability of raw material is the main bottleneck. Likely referencing the existing bottlenecks with upstream CW laser ramp. From the podcast, seems like a large focus was on pluggable markets due to larger near-term TAM (which is understandable with $JBL + other players), with CPO being the north star. So it might be interesting if $SIVE M&A ambitions were to acquire more pluggable optical transceiver IP, like what $LITE did with Cloud Light. But TLDR: Lot of different paths moving forward, pluggable here to stay, CPO seems like North Star for where industry is heading. Feels like there's room for every qualified laser supplier given the industry demand is growing faster than what they can all collectively make.

  30. 博主惊叹半导体板块创纪录的单日强劲反弹行情。

    哇,创纪录的单日反弹。 $SIVEF +30.89% $IQEF +28.6% $AEHR +26.53% $CIFR +17.82% $NBIS +17.3% $AAOI +15.6% $LPK +14.48% $AXTI +14.12% $MU +12.54% $SNDK +12.8% $SOI +11.1% $TSEM +10.39% $LITE +9.25% $INTC +8.22% $AMD +8.11% $MRVL +7.27%

    英文原文

    Wow, a historic single day recovery. $SIVEF +30.89% $IQEF +28.6% $AEHR +26.53% $CIFR +17.82% $NBIS +17.3% $AAOI +15.6% $LPK +14.48% $AXTI +14.12% $MU +12.54% $SNDK +12.8% $SOI +11.1% $TSEM +10.39% $LITE +9.25% $INTC +8.22% $AMD +8.11% $MRVL +7.27%