$RPI
相关推文
按时间倒序
-
反思自己的投资风格：基于市场尚未理解的信息做判断。
我觉得我个人的投资风格有点不同，算是一些反思： 它本质上是自由裁量式的，基于市场还不知道的东西，也像是人生经历的综合结果。 如果你看 $AXTI、$RPI、$SIVE、$IQE 以及其他名字，很多其实是在猜测……
原推 ↗英文原文
I think my personal style of investing is a bit different, just some reflection: It's inherently discretionary, based on stuff markets don't know yet. And a culmination of life experiences? If you look at $AXTI, $RPI, $SIVE, $IQE and others. Lot of it is guessing on
-
称质疑者在SOI/RPI/SIVE上反复被打脸。
回复 @Frenchie_：他们在 $SOI、$RPI 和 $SIVE 等所有事情上都一直和我争。 然后一次又一次尴尬。不知道他们会不会学会。
原推 ↗英文原文
@Frenchie_ They keep fighting with me with everything from $SOI, $RPI, and $SIVE. Then get embarrassed over and over. Idk if they’re going to learn
-
复盘RPI从论点发布后上涨247%。
$RPI：从283美元到983美元，自我发布论点以来上涨247%。 引用：强劲的 AI 相关需求预计将使核心利润“显著高于”市场预期。 结果欧洲媒体2月最喜欢称为“没有基本面的迷因股”的东西，实际上背后是……
原推 ↗英文原文
$RPI: $283 -> $983, up 247% from my thesis post. Quote: Strong AI-related demand was expected to result in core profit "significantly ahead" of market expectations. Turns out European Media’s favorite “memestock” with “no fundamentals” back in Feb. Was actually was backed by https://t.co/5dCCgWTDDp
-
称中文文章很好地复盘了其RPI投资想法演变。
关于我当初对 $RPI 的投资想法是如何一步步演变的，这篇文章写得太精彩了！ 中文圈的朋友真的很擅长讲故事，我非常乐意让更多人看到这类好文。 尤其是，通过这些复盘故事，大家可以更好地了解我在构思原创做多逻辑时的思考过程。
原推 ↗英文原文
关于我当初对 $RPI 的投资想法是如何一步步演变的，这篇文章写得太精彩了！ 中文圈的朋友真的很擅长讲故事我非常乐意让更多人看到这类好文 尤其是，通过这些复盘故事大家可以更好地了解我在构思原创做多逻辑时的思考过程。
-
复盘欧洲媒体曾称RPI为迷因股，后被业绩打脸。
几个月前，一家欧洲媒体把我的 $RPI 想法称为： - “群体愚蠢” 并说： - $RPI 股价会“崩回现实” 然后称它为： - “迷因股”。 财报出来后呢？收入预期被大幅打爆。 很有意思，媒体可以写下这么多诽谤…… 等结果变得很难看时，又假装从没发生过。 从 $SOI 到 $SIVE，媒体诽谤的数量相当惊人。
原推 ↗英文原文
Few months ago, a European publication called my $RPI idea: - “mass stupidity” And said: - $RPI shares would: “come crashing back to reality” Then called it a: - “Meme stock”. Earnings report came out? Blew away revenue expectations. It’s very interesting that media can just write all this slander… Then pretend it never happened when it ages so badly. Amount of media slander from $SOI to $SIVE has been pretty incredible.
-
列举欧洲股票战绩：RPI、LPK、SOI大幅上涨。
以防有人好奇我在欧洲股票上的记录： $RPI：280美元 -> 800美元（agentic AI 硬件需求论点）。 $LPK：约6美元，13美元发表 thesis -> 24.2美元（玻璃核心基板近乎垄断）。 $SOI：44美元 -> 181美元（硅光子，衬底垄断）。
原推 ↗英文原文
Just in case people are wondering about my track record with European equities: $RPI: $280 -> $800 (agentic AI hardware demand thesis). $LPK: ~$6, thesis at $13 -> $24.2 (glass cores substrates close monopoly) $SOI: $44 -> $181 (silicon photonics, monopoly over substrates) https://t.co/EWWaVL7Y49
-
长文反驳XFAB是迷因股，强调CHIPS资金、SiPH评估、800VDC功率半导体和低估值。
媒体兄弟……$XFAB 怎么会是迷因股？ 这次能不能不要重复 $RPI 的错误？ 它们字面上因为自身关键性正在获得欧盟 CHIPS Act 资金。 并且有 $NVDA / $NOK 在评估它们的 SiPH 业务，同时它们以约1.28倍低市净率交易。 这让我想起 $SOI：低市净率，但传统业务拖累之外有高增长垂直领域。 $XFAB 下周在 CHIPS Act 2 蓝图中被明确提到，而该蓝图聚焦光子学。 主要收入爬坡围绕 $NVDA 推动 800VDC 带来的功率半导体。 所以 $NVTS、$POWI、$WOLF 等最近都在起飞。 市场只是错过了 $XFAB，因为它是功率半导体里知名度较低的代工厂……但美国商务部两年前就指出它是美国唯一高量 SiC 代工厂。 我只是刚好指出了这些连接。 不要因为你不理解某件事，就把它叫作“迷因股”，说价格脱离基本面。
原推 ↗英文原文
Bro media… how is $XFAB a meme stock? Can you not repeat the same mistake with $RPI this time? They’re literally getting CHIPS ACT funding from the EU because of how critical they are. And have $NVDA / $NOK evaluating their SiPH side of things, while they traded at a low ~1.28 P/B. This just reminded me of $SOI low p/b but high growth verticals out of legacy segment drag. $XFAB was literally mentioned for CHIPS ACT 2 next week in the blueprints… Which focuses around photonics. The main revenue ramp was around power semis with $NVDA pushing 800 vdc. So $NVTS, $POWI, $WOLF and everyone have been taking off recently. Markets just missed $XFAB, because they’re a lesser known foundry in power semis…But US Dpt. Of commerce pointed them out as the only high volume SiC foundry in the US 2Y ago. I just happened to point out the connections. Just because you don’t understand something, don’t just go call it a “meme stock” with price detached from fundamentals.
-
复盘RPI接近三倍，并列举多只曾被机构看空后大涨的标的。
$RPI，接近约3倍回报。 这是媒体贴上“迷因股”标签后的结果。 我觉得散户看到机构看空我的 thesis 帖后， 先后纸手卖掉 $AXTI、$RPI、$IQE、$EWY、$SNDK、$AAOI、$SOI。 然后眼看它们全部上涨3倍到15倍以上。
原推 ↗英文原文
$RPI, close to ~3x returns. Off the media branded "Meme Stock". I think after retail saw institutions bear post my thesis posts. Then ended up paper handing $AXTI, then $RPI, then $IQE, then $EWY, then $SNDK, then $AAOI, then $SOI. And them watch them all go up 3x-15x+ https://t.co/SZj4bAAIMH
-
长文阐述用百分比回报验证thesis，而不是用金额炫富卖订阅。
我不公布美元金额，因为那并不重要。 重要的是回报百分比。说到这个…… 年初至今：3840.39%。 我可能是世界上唯一一个在短时间内点出多个10倍股的人。 你还记得这些 thesis 吗？ 1. $AXTI 2. $SIVE 3. $AAOI 4. $LITE 5. $IQE 6. $AEHR 7. $CRCL 8. $EWY 9. Unimicron 10. Nitto Boseki 11. $OSS 12. $GDRZF 13. $RPI 14. $SOI 15. $ALRIB 16. $SNDK 17. $SIMO 18. $VPG 19. $TSEM 20. $ARM 21. $MRVL 22. $INTC 23. $LPK 24. $NBIS 25. $MU 它们都上涨了100-1000%+，因为： 1. 我发布 thesis。 2. 人们可以看到几个月后股票表现。 3. 它们最终正确（thesis 被验证），因为上涨数百个百分点并保持回报。 我非常不喜欢传统 X 网红展示大额美元数字、名表、豪车、私人飞机。 然后用这些来卖昂贵订阅，而不是靠市场回报赚更多。 所以我想通过免费的 thesis 帖和之后的百分比回报结果，建立一种基于纯信息发现/综合的新趋势。 简而言之：验证 thesis 最重要的是市场百分比回报。 不是赚到的美元金额。
原推 ↗英文原文
I don't post dollar amounts because they don't matter. What matters is return %. Speaking of that... YTD: 3840.39%. I'm probably the only one in the world. Who called out multiple names that 10x'd in a short timeframe. Do you remember these thesis anon? 1. $AXTI 2. $SIVE 3. $AAOI 4. $LITE 5. $IQE 6. $AEHR 7. $CRCL 8. $EWY 9. Unimicron 10. Nitto Boseki 11. $OSS 12. $GDRZF 13. $RPI 14. $SOI 15. $ALRIB 16. $SNDK 17. $SIMO 18. $VPG 19. $TSEM 20. $ARM 21. $MRVL 22. $INTC 23. $LPK 24. $NBIS 25. $MU They're all up 100-1000%+, because... 1. I post a thesis. 2. People can see how the stock performs months later. 3. They turn out right (thesis validation) because they're up hundreds of percent + hold their returns. I really dislike the traditional X influencer who shows large dollar amounts or fancy watches/cars/private jets. Then use that to get more by selling expensive subscriptions rather than through market returns. So trying to set a new trend off pure information discovery/synthesis from free thesis posts and the results that follow in terms of return percentages. TLDR: Market returns in terms of percentages matter the most to validate a thesis. Not the dollar amount made.
-
SIVE/RPI模式类似：信息综合上涨后机构负面报道、散户卖出、机构买入流通盘、股价新高。
回复 @dubidubabap：我看到 $SIVE、$RPI 以及基本所有事情都有很强的相似性。 它诡异地类似于：信息综合推动价格上涨 -> 机构发布负面新闻/媒体周期 -> 散户卖出 -> 结果机构在买入流通盘 -> 股票创历史新高。
原推 ↗英文原文
@dubidubabap I see pretty strong parallels with $SIVE, $RPI, and basically everything. It’s eerily similar to price rises on info synthesis -> institutions publish negative news/media cycles -> retail sells -> turns out institutions were buying the float -> stock hits ATHs.
-
列出年内高收益长仓并回顾战绩
Leopold Aschenbrenner 很传奇，但我不确定他能打败 Serenity Awareness fund 今年至今 3152.77% 的收益。 不过话说回来，我今年已经做对了 23 个不同的多头，年内回报在 100% 到 1000%+ 之间。 1. $AXTI 2. $AAOI 3. $SIVE 4. $LITE 5. $IQE 6. $AEHR 7. $CRCL 8. $EWY 9. Unimicron 10. Nitto Boseki 11. $OSS 12. $GDRZF 13. $RPI 14. $SOI 15. $ALRIB 16. $SNDK 17. $SIMO 18. $VPG 19. $TSEM 20. $ARM 21. $MRVL 22. $INTC 23. $LPK 你还记得这些吗，anon？
原推 ↗英文原文
Leopold Aschenbrenner is a legend, but I'm not quite sure he can beat 3152.77% YTD in the Serenity Awareness fund. That being said, I've hit 23 different longs this year with 100-1000%+ YTD. 1. $AXTI 2. $AAOI 3. $SIVE 4. $LITE 5. $IQE 6. $AEHR 7. $CRCL 8. $EWY 9. Unimicron 10. Nitto Boseki 11. $OSS 12. $GDRZF 13. $RPI 14. $SOI 15. $ALRIB 16. $SNDK 17. $SIMO 18. $VPG 19. $TSEM 20. $ARM 21. $MRVL 22. $INTC 23. $LPK Do you remember all of these anon?
-
欧洲媒体看空的名字后来都在创新高
就在 3 个月前，欧洲媒体还把我的 $RPI thesis 叫成“meme stock”，说盈利不该被纳入决策。 2 个月前，$SOI 被说成“估值过高，thesis 没有新东西”。 这个月又轮到 $SIVE，被说成“没什么特别的，Sivers 或 CPO 早就存在很多年了”。 结果这三个现在年内都还在创新高，而且都是三位数回报。尤其是 Raspberry Pi，在把前瞻收入增长预期从约 15% 押到 52% 到 55% 后，表现非常夸张。 我也预计这三只（$RPI、$SIVE、$SOI）会继续在 AI、SiPH 和 CPO 的驱动下交出创纪录增长。 也许每次这些负面稿子出来之后，欧洲媒体都该照照镜子？ 真正盯基本面的那些人，反而成了他们嘲笑的对象。
原推 ↗英文原文
Just 3 months ago, European media called my $RPI thesis: "A Meme Stock" where earnings isn't factored into decisions. 2 months ago, $SOI was labeled "overvalued, with nothing new with the thesis". This month it's $SIVE is "nothing special with Sivers or CPO, it's been around for years". Each are still hitting YTD highs with triple digit returns. Especially, Raspberry PI after it shattered projections by 52% to 55% fwd. rev growth from ~15% est. And I expect all 3 ($RPI, $SIVE, and $SOI) to keep delivering record growth as AI, SiPH, and CPO drive structural re-rating. Maybe after each negative hit piece... it's time for European media to look in a mirror? The ones focusing on actual fundamentals are the ones they're mocking.
-
回顾 RPI thesis 被媒体唱空后仍然兑现
@pennycheck 哈哈，这个 thesis 我收到了很多负面声音，尤其是媒体和各种杂志。 很高兴它后来真的走出来了。 https://t.co/l0Oxak3s27
原推 ↗英文原文
@pennycheck lol I got so much negativity from this thesis, especially from the media and random journals. Glad to see it age well https://t.co/l0Oxak3s27
-
RPI 从 meme stock 变成接近历史新高
那个“没有基本面”的 Meme Stock $RPI，现在已经接近历史新高了，靠的是创纪录的营收预测。 看到这个想法逐步兑现，挺有意思。 https://t.co/wx9hQYzJGT
原推 ↗英文原文
The "Meme Stock" with no fundamentals $RPI is now approaching all time highs from record revenue projections. Fun to see this idea age well. https://t.co/wx9hQYzJGT
-
作者两个月前逆势做多$EWY，现在浮盈约3倍，证明自己判断正确。
两个月前所有人都在唱空 $EWY。 称其为“白银崩盘”或“高丽指数泡沫”。 现在他们全都改口，说自己一直看多存储器。 即便从 $RPI 到 $SIVE 的恐惧发帖不断，我的论点最终还是正确的。 我能积累24.5万+粉丝的主要原因，是我对自己的观点始终保持一致性且立场坚定。 我的 $EWY 多头仓位现在浮盈约3倍。 （引用内容）： 感觉所有人都在唱空韩国综合指数（KOSPI），说： > “看看这图表，它不可能一直涨下去！” > 存储器是需求的黑洞（$SNDK 要等3年才能交付预订单） > $EWY 基本就是两只股票，三星和SK海力士，不能代表韩国经济 > 就像说台湾指数是泡沫，因为追踪 $TSM 和联发科的指数在涨。 > 存储器需求/AI不会因为伊朗战争就消失，只是会变得更贵。 > 原油/LNG能源成本增加会转嫁给超大规模云厂商，不会被运营费用吸收。 这看起来是恐惧抛售和去杠杆化（3倍杠杆ETF和10倍可能已被清洗），而不是实质性运营问题（略有 bearish 阻力，但不至于 -30%）。 SK海力士期货现在市值交易区间在$300B 高位到 $400B 低位。 如果 $MS 和更新的分析师预期即使略微正确，SK海力士的营业利润例如将达到约$300B。 到2028年他们将坐拥大量现金储备，即使存储器价格下跌也不怕。（甚至还没考虑需求变成结构性）。 这看起来又是另一个DeepSeek-Nvidia式的恐惧抛售情形，尤其是在nand/dram价格最近再次调涨之后。更像是底部时机的把握问题。 像这样的时刻，逻辑比非理性的标题党抛售更重要。
原推 ↗英文原文
Everyone was doomposting $EWY 2 months ago. Calling it “Silver Crash” or “KOSPI crash bubble” Now they’re all flip flopping opinions, saying they were bullish memory all along. Even despite fear posting from $RPI to $SIVE, my thesis ends up right. Main reason I got 245K+ followers is because I’m consistently right about my opinions while taking a firm directional stance. My $EWY longs are now up ~3x.
-
瑞典媒体看不懂光子学
我真的笑了。这大概是我目前见过最搞笑的标题了，自从 $RPI 那次之后。 你会看到瑞典那些不懂技术的记者，对半导体 / 光子学一窍不通。 他们在分析 $SIVE，还告诉所有本地人（大多数持股者）赶紧卖掉，因为它只是个“meme”。 他们不懂围绕即将到来的 $JBL 1.6T 或 $MRVL CPO 放量的超大规模云厂商认证周期吗？ 也不懂它刚刚被验证为 $GFS 生态里的激光供应商，而且 $AMD 正在推动新的 CPO 需求吗？ > 一定是 meme。只能按 2025 年 TTM 资产负债表和旧营收预测来估值，对吧？ 至少这种波动有助于在明年 CPO / 1.6T 关键拐点之前，把控制权转给美国投资者 / 机构。
原推 ↗英文原文
I'm genuinely laughing. This is gotta be the funniest headline I've seen to date since $RPI. You have non-technical journalists in Sweden, with no understanding of semiconductors/photonics. Doing an analysis on $SIVE and telling all the locals (who hold majority) to sell, because it's a "meme". Don't understand hyperscaler qualification cycles from upcoming $JBL 1.6T or $MRVL CPO ramp? Or the fact they just got validated as the laser supplier in $GFS ecosystem with $AMD driving new CPO demand? > Must be a meme. It's only possible to value a company based on TTM 2025 balance sheets and old revenue projections right? At least this volatility helps transfer control over to US investors/institutions before CPO/1.6T inflection point next year.
-
不要只看 meme 标签
就在一个月前，记者和媒体还在淡化我对 $SOI 和 $RPI 的 thesis。 他们引用我的 WSB 标签，把它说成是“注定要崩的 meme 股”，却没有分析底层 thesis。 结果这两只都涨了 100%，而且把涨幅守住了。 $SIVE 现在也是同样的情况。 我从来不靠权威说话……但既然他们想走这条路： 我就很好奇……他们的叙事里为什么总把我在 Nature 之类的地方发表过、被引用上千次的基础 AI 论文背景漏掉？ 又或者为什么今天 X 上那些看多 $SIVE 的分析师里，有些人是 UC Berkeley 的 Ph.D.，而且本身就在光子学领域发文？ 反而总是英语系或非技术背景的毕业生跑去媒体上，对 CPO 超大规模云厂商认证周期和供应链映射发表最强硬的意见。 我总觉得机构最不喜欢的，就是散户投资者在 X 上真的懂自己在说什么。 一个 thesis 应该靠本身的价值生死，而不是发言人是什么权威。
原推 ↗英文原文
Just 1 month ago, journalists and media tried downplaying my $SOI and $RPI thesis. As “meme stocks that were set to crash” citing my WSB tag without analyzing the underlying thesis. They’re both up 100% and held their gains. Same is happening to companies like $SIVE. I never argue from authority… but since they’re going that route: I’m curious why… in their narratives they just leave out the fact I published fundamental AI papers in places like Nature with thousands of citations? Other the fact other analysts on X positive about $SIVE today have Ph.Ds from places like UC Berkeley and publish in the photonics space? It’s always the English or non-technical graduates that go out in the media and have the strongest opinion about CPO hyperscaler qualification cycles and supply chain mapping. It just feels like institutions hate it when a retail investors on X know what they’re talking about. A thesis should live and die based on merit, not the authority of who is comes from.
-
在光子学超级周期中做多整条CPO/1.6T供应链，推荐SIVE/Shunsin/Win Semi/MRVL/HPS.A五只标的
在更广泛的光子学超级周期中，提前布局1.6T/共封装光学(CPO)对我来说是最具吸引力的投资。我对这个观点有很高的信心。这就是为什么我做多整条供应链（外加一个额外瓶颈）： 1. $SIVE - 他们的激光收入随着$JBL、$MRVL、Ayar、O-Net大幅增长。而且我确实认为CPO/1.6T将远超任何保守的分析师预期，因为$NVDA、$GOOGL等公司大力推动光子学架构。下行风险是多源采购，但Jabil选择Sivers是有原因的。当你比较$MTSI、$LITE、$COHR、古河电工等公司时，全球范围内真正强大的激光供应商屈指可数...它们的市值都超过100亿美元，然后你有这个类似小型芯片法案的瓶颈，市值还不到10亿美元。 2. Shunsin（6451）- 我不明白为什么Foxconn的光学代工厂（用于测试、封装和组装）的估值比$LWLG低15亿美元市值。考虑到他们通过Foxconn的光子学规模显得非常去风险化。$TSM的光学部门VisEra估值约50亿美元，但他们从第三代在2028年下半年才能扩大产能。Foxconn看起来明年就要开始提升产能。他们只是基于$NVDA CPO供应链在台湾的需求以低远期市盈率倍数增长，所有公开指标都指向产能扩张和极端需求。 3. Win Semi - 他们是Sivers扩大DFB激光生产的代工厂，以及$AVGO、SpaceX供应链等的代工厂。当我做供应链映射时，Win Semi在我看到的每个前沿供应链中都出现了。市场可能有一些东西没有定价。 4. $MRVL - 我觉得作为小型Broadcom真的很吸引人。他们今天与$GOOGL的潜在设计有助于2028年后的业务案例。但我关注的催化剂是$MSFT Maia的提升，发生时间是2026年下半年，并可能在2027、2028、2029年持续指数级增长。Celestial收购对他们来说可能是世界上最明智的决定。也许在下次回调或CSP时买入？ 5. $HPS.A - 变压器/开关设备是数据中心供应链中的商品和平淡的部件。然而，当瓶颈是2-5年，且订单积压增长超过100%...导致极端短缺时。自从我发帖以来只涨了20%以上，但我确实看到去风险化，考虑到大量订单积压的可见性（即使它是推断的，他们不给出确切数字）。我确实认为市场错过了一些东西，特别是如果他们成功实施价格上涨，潜在的毛利率扩张....同样，订单积压加需求只是为公司去风险，而且看起来像是去年设施扩张后的高增长复合器。 还有很多其他我非常喜欢的如$NBIS、$JBL、$RPI、$TSEM、$LITE、$ARM、$SOI、$AXTI、$IQE、$ALRIB、Fittech、PCL等，但我只是从脑海中随口提到5个从今天的价格...如果我要创建一个新投资组合。当然，与其他与AI供应链不相关的公司进行杠铃式配置是好的，但这些只是我喜欢的5个。
原推 ↗英文原文
Frontrunning 1.6T/CPO within the broader photonics supercycle is the most compelling investment to me. I have high conviction in that statement. Which is why I'm long the entire supply chain (+1 extra bottlenecK) 1. $SIVE - Their laser revenue scales aggressively with $JBL, $MRVL, Ayar, O-Net. And I do think CPO/1.6T will blow away any conservative analyst projections from how hard $NVDA, $GOOGL, and others have been pushing photonics architectures. Downside risk is multi-sourcing, but there's a reason Jabil chose Sivers. When you compare $MTSI, $LITE, $COHR, Furukawa, and others. There's genuinely not many laser suppliers in the entire world... they're all $10B+, then you have this mini CHIPS act chokepoint trading at <$1B MC. 2. Shunsin (6451) - I don't see how it's possible Foxconn's optical foundry for testing, packaging, and assembly is valued at $1.5B MC less than $LWLG. When they look extremely derisked piggybacking off of Foxconn's photonics volume. $TSM's optical arm VisEra example is ~$5B, but they scale H2 2028 from Gen-3. Foxconn looks to be ramping up just next year. They're just scaling low fwd p/e multiples off of $NVDA CPO supply chain demand in Taiwan and all public indicators point to capacity expansion + extreme demand. 3. Win Semi - They're the foundry for Sivers to scale up DFB laser production. As well as $AVGO, SpaceX supply chains and others. When I do supply chain mapping and Win Semi pops up in every single frontier supply chain I see. There's probably something markets are not pricing in. 4. $MRVL - I find this genuinely compelling as a mini-Broadcomm. Their potential design with with $GOOGL today, helps the case past 2028. But the catalyst I was looking at was $MSFT Maia ramp, which happens H2 2026, and likely keep scaling up exponentially into 2027, 2028, 2029. Celestial acquisition was probably the smartest thing in the world for them. Maybe on next drop or CSP? 5. $HPS.A - Transformers/Switchgears are commodities + boring parts of the DC supply chain. However, when the bottleneck is 2-5 years, and you have backlog increasing 100%+... causing extreme shortages. It's only up 20%+ since my thesis post, but I do see this being de-risked given massive backlog visibility (even though it's inferred, they don't give exact #). I do think markets are missing something, especially with potential gross margin expansion from price hikes if they pull it off.... Again backlog + demand just de-risks this company, and it seems like a high growth compounder post facility expansion last year. There's many others like $NBIS, $JBL, $RPI, $TSEM, $LITE, $ARM, $SOI, $AXTI, $IQE, $ALRIB, Fittech, PCL, and others that I'm very fond of, but just mentioning 5 off the top of my head from today's prices... if I'm creating a new portfolio. Of course, it's good to barbell with other uncorrelated companies to AI supply chains, but these are just 5 I liked.
-
两周内多数持仓股大涨，长期逻辑不变，短期入场点决定10-20%收益差异。
哇，大部分这30只我喜欢的股票两周内都涨了很多（给新来的朋友们做个回顾）顺便说一下，我对它们任何一只的长期看法都没有改变，从$MRVL、$AMD、$ARM到其他的。短期入场点位是会变的，比如从$AAOI到$AEHR，而这些点位差异会产生+10-20%的不同。我在做新布局时，分析中会花很多精力在"未被发掘"的标的上，比如Riber或$SIVE或$RPI或$IQE->等待它演绎出来。但去年关于$LITE或$NBIS或$AXTI的论点还是一样的。我不需要反复发布相同的论点，因为它已经不是新东西了。但它们之所以不再是新的，是因为市场已经验证了这些论点，正在因此对股票进行实时重新定价。
原推 ↗英文原文
Wow, majority of these 30 stocks I’ve liked are up a lot in just two weeks (just a recap to new folks) By the way, my long term opinion doesn’t change on any of them from $MRVL, $AMD, $ARM and others. Short term entry points do though with names like $AAOI to $AEHR. And they make the difference between +10-20%. I focus a lot about the “undiscovered” ones like Riber or $SIVE or $RPI or $IQE in analysis when I make a new entry -> wait for it to play out. But the same thesis around $LITE or $NBIS or $AXTI from last year is still the same. And I don’t need to post that same thesis multiple times, since it’s not new anymore. But the reason they’re not new is because markets have validated the thesis and are repricing the stocks live because of them.
-
不想做跟单秀
@itsakek 我不是 Enplas 或 Win Semi 那类第一时间就有仓位的人，所以不会发那种“你听到了吗，匿名网友？”的帖子。 如果我的 thesis 本身是独特的，比如 $RPI 或 $AXTI，那我就会去表达胜利感。
原推 ↗英文原文
@itsakek I’m not first to Enplas or stuff like Win Semi, so not going to do a did you listen anon? Type post. If my thesis is originally unique like $RPI or $AXTI I’m going to victory lap a lot on the way up.
-
分享想法是为了帮散户
真心感谢大家的好评。 我最终还是把自己的想法免费分享出来，因为我想帮助散户社区。 $TSEM 已经实现了三位数回报……所以 YTD 里有 16 个不同名字都涨了很多。 因此我的年内回报也达到了 1525%+。 顺便回顾一下一路上的各种攻击和骚扰： 1. $AXTI - “拉高出货”、“中国垃圾股”，还因为 AXT 从 12 美元涨到 80 美元，WSB $RDDT 的版主把我封了，理由是投资者真的赚到钱了。 2. $AAOI - “没有基本面的拉盘股，meme 股” 3. $SIVEF - “拉高出货” “meme 股” 4. $LITE - “光子泡沫” 5. $IQE - “就是在拉小市值股” 6. $AEHR - “营收负增长的股票，为什么大家不去看他而要花 2000 多美元买我的订阅？” 7. $CRCL - “TA 说它会跌到 30 美元” 8. $EWY - “只是从关注者那儿来的” （提示，这是韩国指数） 9. Unimicron - “这个点子没用，给我美国股票” 10. Nitto Boseki - “这个点子没用，给我美国股票” 11. $OSS - 抄想法（不，我对委内瑞拉的整合是原创） 12. $GDRZF - “你是个很糟糕的人，居然想从委内瑞拉战争里赚钱” 13. $RPI - “因为你是 meme trader，所以这就是 meme 股”（FT、欧洲媒体） 14. $SOI - “拉高出货”、“没有新意”（随机分析师） 15. $ALRIB - “拉小市值股”（不，这是 $MSFT 量子信息发现） 16. $TSEM - “只是因为关注者才买”（兄弟，这是 250 亿美元以上的公司，这些都是机构） 还是那句话……关于基本面的判断一直都是对的？我只是提前把信息整合 / 发现分享出来，赶在机构发现之前。 散户和媒体应该庆祝 16+ 个不同想法年内都涨了 100%+，因为股票本来就是正和游戏。 散户、公司和本地经济都受益。 结果却是负面情绪满天飞，大家一直在试图贬低 / 淡化这些想法，就像抢跑光子超级周期……即便这些想法最后都证明是对的？ 这些喷子开始影响到我了，从 $IREN 那帮人每天换新账号发现实威胁，到欧洲媒体对“拉高出货”的虚假叙事……因为我确实会读每条评论。 但注意看……95% 的东西都在涨？而且 Point72 和 Apollo 这种机构最后都买了我提到的名字？ 这种评论确实有助于让我继续留在 X 上，而且我确实喜欢在喷子身上打回去。
原推 ↗英文原文
Genuinely thanks for nice comments. I share my ideas for free in the end though since I want to help out the retail community. $TSEM hit triple digit return... so that's 16 different names YTD. So my YTD hit 1525%+ as a result. Just to recap all the endless abuse and harassment along the way: 1. $AXTI - "Pump and Dump", "Scam Chinese Stock", Got banned from WSB $RDDT after Mods got mad investors actually made money AXT going from $12->$80. 2. $AAOI - "Pumping stock with no fundamentals, Meme stock" 3. $SIVEF - "Pump and Dump" "Meme Stock" 4. $LITE - "Photonics Bubble" 5. $IQE - "Just pumping low MC stocks" 6. $AEHR - "Stock with negative revenue growth, why is anyone following this guy and not paying $2,000+ for my subscription?" 7. $CRCL - "TA says it's going down to $30" 8. $EWY - "Just from followers" (hint, it's the South Korean Index) 9. Unimicron - "Idea is useless give me US stocks" 10. Nitto Boseki - "Idea is useless give me US stocks" 11. $OSS - Stealing Ideas (no, my synthesis around Venezuela was novel) 12. $GDRZF - "You're a terrible human trying to profit off of the War in Venezuela" 13. $RPI - "Meme stock all because of a Meme Trader" (FT, European Media). 14. $SOI - "Pump and dump", "no novel idea" (random analysts) 15. $ALRIB - "Pumping low MC stocks" (no, it's $MSFT quantum information discovery) 16. $TSEM - "Pumping based on followers alone" (bro it's $25B+, these are institutions) Or how about... the idea around fundamentals was right all along? And I'm just sharing information synthesis/discovery before institutions find out about them. Retail and media should be celebrating when 16+ different ideas return 100%+ YTD, since stocks are positive sum. Everyone from retail, the companies, and local economies benefits. Instead, negativity is through the roof and people keep trying to diminish/downplay the ideas like frontrunning the photonics supercycle… even when they actually turn out right? The trolls are starting to get to me, from $IREN folks creating new accounts every day just to send IRL threats, to European media disinformation about "pumping and dumping"... since I do read every comment. But notice... how 95% of things keep going up? And institutions like Point72 and Apollo end up buying the names I mention? Comments like this do make it helpful to stay on X, and I do enjoy taking victory laps on the haters.
-
回顾自己在 WSB 被封和多只名字被骂空的经历。
一个有意思的事实：我在 WSB 子版块里因为 $AXTI 从 12 美元涨到 80 美元以上而被封了，原因是版主气得不行，因为它一直涨，而且后来证明我是对的。 像 $RPI 这种名字因为“meme stock”叙事被无休止地攻击，连 FT 和新闻媒体都这样……但最后还是翻倍了。 $SOI 之类的名字也被无穷无尽地骂成拉盘砸盘。 $SIVE 之类的名字也被无休止地攻击，带着一堆瑞典式的酸味。 $AEHR 之类的也一样。 还有 $SOI，也一直被人喷成“肯定别人比我先建仓了”。 我也不知道……只要你是第一个发现的人，就会招来一大堆仇恨评论。等它变成 50-100 亿美元市值、涨了 1000%+ 之后，大家才会说“哦，原来可以做多啊”。
原推 ↗英文原文
Fun fact I got banned on WSB subreddit after $AXTI went from $12 to $80+ because Mods got mad it kept going up and played out correctly. Names like $RPI got endless harassment over "meme stock" narratives. Including FT and news media... but it ended up doubling anyway. Names like $SOI, endless pump and dump harassment. Names like $SIVE, endless Swedish salt harassment. Names like $AEHR, endless harassment. Names like $SOI, endless harassment thinking someone else went long before I did. Idk... whenever you're first to something, it's just a ton of hate comments. And only after it's a $5-10B+ company after going up 1000%+ is it "okay" to go long.
-
列出自己年内成功翻倍数百倍的 15 只股票。
很高兴听到这个！ 我已经做多并写过 thesis 帖子的股票，大概有 15 只，今年回报达到了 100-1000%+？ 1. $AXTI 2. $AAOI 3. $SIVEF 4. $LITE 5. $IQE 6. $AEHR 7. $CRCL 8. $EWY 9. Unimicron 10. Nitto Boseki 11. $OSS 12. $GDRZF 13. $RPI 14. $SOI 15. $ALRIB 还不算像 $TSEM 这种，接下来一个月也快要接近三位数回报的名字。 因为我在网上免费发想法，结果招来这么多仇恨，真的挺离谱。 也开始能理解为什么有些人干脆搞 2 万美元的付费墙，把信息卖给西方机构，而不是去帮那些酸溜溜的散户（尤其是欧洲那边）。 不过这些正面评论也让我更有动力继续发帖。
原推 ↗英文原文
Glad to hear it! I've went long and wrote thesis posts on about out 15 different stocks that hit 100-1000%+ YTD? 1. $AXTI 2. $AAOI 3. $SIVEF 4. $LITE 5. $IQE 6. $AEHR 7. $CRCL 8. $EWY 9. Unimicron 10. Nitto Boseki 11. $OSS 12. $GDRZF 13. $RPI 14. $SOI 15. $ALRIB Not including others like $TSEM that are about to hit triple digit returns too in a month. The amount of hate people like myself get for posting free ideas over the internet is pretty insane TBH. Starting to make sense why people just set up $20,000 paywalls and sell info to Western institutions instead of helping out salty retail investors (especially over in Europe). But helps me keep motivated to keep posting with these positive comments.
-
说 SOI 已是今年第 16 只翻倍股。
哇，$SOI 现在已经成了我第 16 只…… 我今年写过的 mini thesis 里，已经有一只回报超过 100% 了。 最近两只是 $ALRIB 和 $RPI。 为什么我身边的一切都在翻倍？ https://t.co/ttgmKWEhhU
原推 ↗英文原文
Wow $SOI is now the 16th name... I've done a mininthesis post on that returned over 100% Year to Date. The most recent two were $ALRIB and $RPI. Why does everything around me keep doubling? https://t.co/ttgmKWEhhU
-
作者解释其研究方法论：提前发现被低估的小盘股，在机构买入前将信息分享给散户
不。这种扯淡的思维模式该停止了。 我的做法是在这些股票实现100-500%+回报之前，先向散户指出它们。 美国机构如Point72或Apollo最终会把它们买下来的。 1. $IQE上涨是因为它们坐拥全球最大的InP反应器隐性代工产能，当时市值仅1亿欧元，而Landmark等公司交易在38亿美元。 它们还是$LITE的供应商，而光子学/epiwafer需求今年爆发了。 2. $SIVE上涨是因为它们与$JBL和O-Net签订了新协议。 但当我首次建仓时，它们还鲜为人知——作为$MRVL CPO项目的激光供应商。 如果我没有引起关注，像$AVGO这样的美国机构很可能会像高通收购Alphawave那样，直接收购这家公司——在openlight那边发生的事情。 那样的话瑞典散户投资者就得不到任何上涨收益了。 3. $ALRIB上涨是因为它们的财报将市盈率压低至远期26倍，尽管在MBE领域与$VECO保持双头垄断地位。 加上新的SiPH设备，以及$IQE和QD Laser（量子点）都是它们的客户。 这是我十年来最原始的信息发现——原来$MSFT Quantum是它们的买家。 你不会看到直接的超大规模云厂商前沿量子计算项目依赖一家市值不到10亿美元的公司。 4. $SOI上涨208%是因为它在硅光子学和CPO用的SOI基材上拥有不为人知的垄断地位。 这更多是信息整合加上在它们传统业务周期底部买入的时机把握。 5. $RPI上涨是因为财报和AI硬件使用量。 我只是第一个指出它的人。 我预测营收增长55%，而分析师预测14%。它们实际做到了58%。 我只是给了散户在机构有机会发现并定价之前买入的机会。 即使我不发我的分析报告，这只股票也会基于纯基本面上涨——作为一家无晶圆厂公司，你不可能用5亿美元市值做出5.11亿美元营收。 我只是给散户在机构之前获得信息发现的所有机会。 这与那些机构告诉你买指数基金或已经涨了1500%的股票——让你当退出流动性的完全不同的模式。
原推 ↗英文原文
No. This type of BS mindset needs to stop. What I do is point them out to retail first before the 100-500%+ returns. US institutions like Point72 or Apollo would have bought them out eventually. 1. $IQE went up because they're sitting on the most latent merchant capacity in the world for InP reactors back at a 100M euro marketcap. While companies like Landmark were trading at $3.8B. They were also the supplier to $LITE, and photonics/epiwafer demand took off this year. 2. $SIVE went up because they had new deals with $JBL and O-Net. But they were already unknown as the laser supplier to $MRVL's CPO program when I first went long. American institutions like $AVGO would have likely just bought the company directly like what Qualcomm did with Alphawave over in the openlight side of things if I didn't bring attention to it. Then Swedish retail investors wouldn't get any of the upside. 3. $ALRIB went up because their earnings sent their P/E down to fwd 26, despite holding a duopoly in the MBE category with $VECO. This combined with new SiPH equipment, as well as $IQE + QD Laser (for quantum dot) being their customers. This was combined from raw information discovery of the decade that $MSFT Quantum was their buyer. You don't see direct hyperscaler frontier programs in quantum computing dependant on some <$1B MC company. 4. $SOI is up 208% because it has an unknown monopoly over SOI substrates for silicon photonics and CPO. This was more information synthesis combined with timing the bottom of their legacy cycle. 5. $RPI went up because of earnings and AI hardware usage. I was just the very first person to point it out. I projected 55% revenue growth compared to 14% from analysts. They did 58%. I just gave retail the chance to buy it before institutions. The stock would have gone up off of pure fundamentals without me posting my thesis because you don't do $511m in revenue off a $500m MC as a fabless company. I'm just giving retail the all the information discovery before institutions have a chance to find it and price it in. This is a completely different model than the same institutions telling you to buy index funds or stocks that already went up 1500% so you're exit liquidity.
-
批评欧洲投资者在底部卖出本土优质公司股票，错失大涨后被美国投资者接盘的现象。
纯粹出于好奇。为什么欧洲人讨厌自己国家的市场？如果看看我所有的核心长仓股票：$IQE今年迄今上涨837%，$SIVE上涨385%，$ALRIB上涨258%，$SOI上涨208%，$RPI上涨107%。当地分析师和记者不断释放负面情绪。但这些公司都是各自国家的国家安全瑰宝（除了树莓派Raspberry Pi）。当地人最终都在底部卖出所有股票，然后股票就转移到美国投资者和机构手中。然后他们就享受不到任何上涨红利。如果像Riber这样的公司被$MSFT用于量子领域，并以26倍市盈率交易，在美国估值会超过16亿美元，就像$LWLG一样。但如果这类公司有任何估值溢价，人们就会酸溜溜的。我见过的对外资最感激的群体是日本人，大多数人都非常欢迎。我认为欧洲人应该为自己领先的前沿公司感到骄傲，因为它们正在受益于西方资本。这样它们才能扩大产能，满足美国超大规模云服务商的需求？这对公司、本地经济都是正和效应。这种落后的思维模式现象需要改变。
原推 ↗英文原文
Out of curiosity. Why do Europeans hate their own markets? If you look at all my core longs: $IQE up 837% YTD $SIVE up 385% YTD $ALRIB up 258% YTD $SOI up 208% YTD $RPI up 107% YTD It’s just endless salt coming from local analysts and reporters. But they’re the national security gems in each country (aside from Raspberry Pi). Locals end up selling all their shares at the bottom, then it just transferred to American investors and institutions. Then they don’t get any of the upside. If a company like Riber is used by $MSFT quantum and traded at a 26 p/e, it would be $1.6B+ in the US like $LWLG. But people are salty if it has a valuation premium at all. The only appreciative community for foreign capital I’ve seen are Japanese, and most have been incredibly welcoming. I feel like Europeans should be proud their leading frontier companies, are benefiting from Western capital. So they can scale up production needed for American hyperscalers? It’s a positive sum effect on the company, and the local economies as well. This backward mindset phenomenon needs to change.
-
说 RPI 两个月后盘中翻倍，证明自己的 AI 硬件 thesis。
$RPI 今天盘中已经涨到三位数回报了，才两个月。 这说明我年内已经从 $AAOI 到 $LITE，命中了 14 只涨幅 100%+ 的股票。 如果我能在很短时间内写出 14 篇分别对应不同多头、而且它们都翻倍的 thesis……也许我确实还行？ 我最早把它定义成 AI agentic hardware orchestration。 但二月份的时候大家都把我的 thesis 叫成“meme”。 （特别感谢 FT、Reuters、Bloomberg） 不过我当时就指出了营收加速，预计会比共识高出 3 倍。财报也验证了我的估计。 现在它正在被重新定价成一家 AI 硬件公司。
原推 ↗英文原文
$RPI hit triple digit % return intraday today, just 2 months later. That’s 14 different stocks I’ve called YTD from $AAOI to $LITE that hit 100%+ returns. Maybe if I’m able to write a thesis on 14 separate longs that double in a short time period… I’m decent at it? I was the first person to long it as AI agentic hardware orchestration. But everyone called my thesis a "Meme" back in Feb. (Special S/O to FT, Reuters, Bloomberg) But I called out revenue acceleration expecting a 3x beat compared to consensus. And their earnings report validated my estimates. It's now being re-rated as an AI hardware company.
-
回顾自己今年已点名多只三位数涨幅股票，并解释自己为何坚持做多。
我感觉自己点名过最多只实现三位数涨幅的股票…… 历史上大概没有几个人比我更多吧？所以我现在才有 15 万以上的关注者！ 在短时间内： $AXTI -> 5 倍+ $AAOI -> 5 倍 $SIVE -> 2 倍+ $LITE -> 2 倍+ $IQE -> 2 倍+ $AEHR -> 2 倍+ $CRCL -> 2 倍+ $EWY IV -> 2 倍 Unimicron -> 2 倍+ Nitto Boseki -> 2 倍+ $OSS -> 2 倍+ $GDRZF -> 2 倍+ $AEHR -> 2 倍 还有更多，比如 $TSEM、$RPI 也接近三位数涨幅。 这里面还不包括去年像 $HOOD 或 $RKLB 那样实现三位数涨幅的很多标的，这里只算今年年初至今。 像 $FORM 以及 Macronix 之类的，还有 $NBIS，从 70 美元底部算起其实也翻倍了。但我不会把这些都算到自己头上，因为当时我没有在那个时间段专门发具体帖子。 只是随口提到很多标的，和真正有 conviction、专门写 thesis 帖子、把催化时间点判断对、并且自己真的做多，是不一样的。 不过如果这些观点帮助散户站在了正确方向上，我还是很开心的。 尤其是他们不需要花 2000 美元以上去看别人做多了哪些票，或者加入某种“特别俱乐部”才能讨论公司。
原推 ↗英文原文
I feel like I've called out the most triple digit stock returns YTD... Out of anyone in history? Hence why I have 150k+ followers now! In just a short timeframe: $AXTI -> 5x+ $AAOI -> 5x $SIVE -> 2x+ $LITE -> 2x+ $IQE -> 2x+ $AEHR -> 2x+ $CRCL -> 2x+ $EWY IV -> 2x Unimicron -> 2x+ Nitto Boseki -> 2x+ $OSS -> 2x+ $GDRZF -> 2x+ $AEHR -> 2x With many more like $TSEM, $RPI having close to triple digit returns. Not including many others last year like $HOOD or $RKLB for triple digit returns, just this YTD. There's stuff like $FORM and others like Macronix... and $NBIS that actually doubled from the bottom at $70. But I won't take credit since I didn't do a specific post about it during the timeframes. There's a difference between just mentioning among many other tickers. Then having conviction like myself, writing a specific thesis post about it, getting catalyst timing right, and going long yourself. But proud if this helped retail going the right direction. Especially that they don’t need to pay $2,000+ just to see tickers people go long on or join some “special club” for company discussion.
-
说自己也帮助过其他半导体标的，并觉得“Knight Serenity”这个名字挺酷。
@Smallcapscat1 对……我也帮过别的半导体标的，比如 $RPI。那只票也差一点就实现了三位数回报。 Knight Serenity 这个名字听起来还挺酷的。
原推 ↗英文原文
@Smallcapscat1 true… I did help out other semis like $RPI. That stock almost returned triple digits too. Knight Serenity sounds kinda cool
-
总结最近的 thesis，并补充自己长期看好的相关标的。
我最近分享的 5 篇 thesis 帖子： 1. $HPS.A（17.7 亿美元）- 变压器 / 开关设备的 DC 瓶颈 2. $ARM（1520 亿美元）- AI CPU 放量 3. Win Semi（57 亿美元）- 面向 CW 激光及从 SpaceX 到人形机器人等供应链的晶圆代工 4. $SIVE（2.95 亿美元）- 2026 年下半年及 2027 年的 CW 激光放量 5. $TSEM（220 亿美元）- 光子学晶圆代工 除此之外，我还看多并正面提到过的名字，比如 $MRVL、$AAOI、$RDDT、$NBIS、$RPI、$AEHR、$LITE、$COHR、SK Hynix、$LASR、$SOI、$IQE 等，也都可能是不错的补充。
原推 ↗英文原文
Most recent 5 thesis posts I've shared: 1. $HPS.A ($1.77B) - Transformer/Switchgear DC bottleneck 2. $ARM ($152B)- AI CPU ramp 3. Win Semi ($5.7B) - Foundry for CW lasers and other supply chains from SpaceX to humanoids 4. $SIVE ($295M) - CW Laser ramp for H2 2026 and 2027. 5. $TSEM ($22B) - photonics foundry Apart from those, names I've positively mentioned like $MRVL, $AAOI, $RDDT, $NBIS, $RPI, $AEHR, $LITE, $COHR, SK Hynix, $LASR, $SOI, $IQE, and others might be decent additions.
-
分析RPI估值偏低，Forward P/E从20.6x降至9.5x，增长58%，AI代理硬件新机遇或带来结构性需求。
$RPI 就 GAAP 前向预测来看确实看起来有点便宜。 - 2026 前向 P/E: $5.29 / $0.256 = 20.6倍 - 2027 前向 P/E: $5.29 / $0.400 = 13.2倍 - 2028 前向 P/E: $5.29 / $0.553 = 9.5倍 基于个人预测。尤其是当你在同比增长 58%（预期会再次上调，因 OpenClaw 的购买）： 当以 2 倍前向市销率交易时，实际上并没有多少溢价。尤其是在 AI 代理硬件(agentic hardware)领域还有新的 TAM 扩张机会。 下行风险是，OpenClaw 只是短期趋势。但 Jensen 在 GTC 上将其验证为下一个重大趋势。 如果这是结构性需求，而 Raspberry Pi 是消费代理硬件领域的 $NVDA……以约 $1B 市值来看，可能是一个绝佳的机会。
原推 ↗英文原文
$RPI does look sort of cheap for GAAP forward projections. - 2026 Forward P/E: $5.29 / $0.256 = 20.6x - 2027 Forward P/E: $5.29 / $0.400 = 13.2x - 2028 Forward P/E: $5.29 / $0.553 = 9.5x Off personal projections. Especially when you’re growing 58% Y/Y (expect this to beat again due to OpenClaw buying): There’s not really much of a premium when it trades at 2x fwd/sales. Especially when theres new TAM expansion opportunities in the AI agentic hardware space. The downside risk is, OpenClaw is just a short term trend. But Jensen did validate it as the next major trend at GTC. If it is structural demand and Raspberry Pi is the $NVDA for consumer agentic hardware… could be a great opportunity at ~$1B MC.
-
等财报验证 thesis 后，RPI 现在估值看起来还不错。
@Test126863 是啊……我已经厌倦了所有噪音，所以就等财报来验证我的 thesis。 现在 $RPI 作为一家 fabless AI 硬件公司，大概只交易在 2 倍前瞻销售。
原推 ↗英文原文
@Test126863 Yeah… got tired of all the noise so just waited for earnings to validate my thesis. Now $RPI is trading at roughly 2 fwd p/s as a fabless ai hardware company.
-
回顾自己对 RPI 的收入预测比分析师更乐观，结果验证了。
@AscendingLife3 是啊，我当时预计营收增长 55%，而分析师全都在说 14%。 结果 $RPI 最后做到了 58%。
原推 ↗英文原文
@AscendingLife3 Yeah I was projecting 55% revenue growth while analysts were all saying 14%. $RPI ended up hitting 58%.
-
复盘 RPI 财报后上涨，并指出 2027 年估值仍有空间。
thesis 验证正在发生。 $RPI 财报后上涨 44.76%。 Raspberry Pi 在 2027 年大概还有很长的路要走，市盈率可能在 11-13 倍左右。 2026 年大概在 19-22 倍。 在需求大幅跳升、前瞻增长从预期 14% 提高到 58% 的情况下…… Raspberry Pi 已经成了 OpenClaw 首选的、快速加速的 AI 编排硬件。
原推 ↗英文原文
Thesis validation in effect. $RPI up 44.76% after earnings. Raspberry Pi likely has a long way to go with some ~11-13x p/e projections for 2027. And ~19-22x for 2026. With a massive surge in demand to 58% fwd growth from 14% expected… Raspberry Pi has become the rapidly accelerating AI orchestration hardware of choice for OpenClaw.
-
以Marvell收购Celestial为例，分析CPO供应链中Sivers作为CW激光器关键瓶颈供应商的巨大TAM扩张潜力。
看看$MRVL收购Celestial（$SIVE是其~2.9亿美元的光源供应商）这个例子就知道了。Marvell以55亿美元收购Celestial（32.5亿美元+22.5亿美元里程碑付款）。2026/2027年预期：零收入，亏损5000万美元。2028年预期：5亿美元收入。2029年预期：10亿美元收入。这是巨大的TAM（市场规模）扩张和收入加速增长。Sivers只是Celestial之上的客户之一，此外还有O-Net、Ayar、其他未公开的CPO（共封装光学）厂商，Jabil负责桥接量产爬坡并赢得良率。那些对光子学毫无理解的散户……正在做的事相当于：因为Celestial在2025、2026年没有CPO收入，就把它建模为5000万美元。因为它目前处于净亏损状态，而不是着眼于2027年之后的大规模爬坡。$SIVE是我抢先布局下一个架构超级周期（位于最早期阶段）的首选标的，涉及ELS TAM扩张+CPO+连续波(CW)激光器瓶颈。如果你想找后期介入的标的，可以看$LITE，它已经涨了3800%。
原推 ↗英文原文
Just look at $MRVL Celestial ( $SIVE is the light source at ~$290m ) as an example. Marvell bought it for $5.5B. ($3.25B + 2.25B milestones). 2026/2027 expectations: 0 revenue, -$50m loss 2028 expectations: $500m revenue 2029 expectations: $1B revenue. This is massive TAM expansion and revenue acceleration. This is just one of Sivers customer on top of O-Net, Ayar, other undisclosed CPO players, with Jabil bridging volume ramp and Win with yields. Random retail users with no understanding of photonics… are doing the equivalent of modeling Celestial at $50m because of no CPO revenue in 2025 2026. And because it’s operating at a net loss instead of looking at the massive ramp 2027 onward. $SIVE is my #1 pick for frontrunning the next architectural supercycles at the very beginning for ELS TAM expansion + CPO + CW laser chokepoints. If you want a later stage pick, you can look at $LITE that already ran 3800%.
-
批评外行和媒体拿财务指标误判光子学、CPO 与 RPI 这类高增长标的。
请别再发消息问我那些随机散户或者记者对 $AXTI 或 $SIVE 的分析了。 对于 $AXTI： 大多数人根本不知道自己在说什么。 三星代工和 $LITE 的 InP fab 完全是供应链的不同环节，这就像把 NAND 和 DRAM 混成一个存储类别一样。 就算说 Sumitomo 会取代 AXT，也说明这些人根本不懂上游的开采 / 加工 / 坩埚瓶颈，而 InP 衬底级公司像 $COHR 或 Sumitomo 本来就不是干这个的。 对于 $SIVE： 这就是 2027 年以后 CPO 规模化放量的质变点。 我看到很多对光子学完全不懂的人，拿毛利率、烧钱速度，以及前几年的营收甚至今年的营收来分析。 可 2027 年以后才会迎来最大的一次架构拐点。 如果你看 $MRVL Celestial 的时间点，它们 2027 年开始放量，2028、2029 年还会指数级增长。 所以我才说 $SIVE 有一天能成为 100 亿美元以上的公司，因为我看的是前瞻增长，而且这是最早能切入的位置。 我做的事情就是找 alpha： 市场可能像那些把 $RPI 前瞻增速说成 14-17% 的分析师一样，把它错定价了。 然后我建模成 55%，结果事实是 58%。 一个是光子学瓶颈，自有其原因。 另一个是被设计进 Jabil 和 Celestial 的，自有其原因。
原推 ↗英文原文
Pls stop tagging me in stuff where random retail investors or journalists tries doing an analysis on $AXTI or $SIVE. For $AXTI: Majority of folks have 0 clue what they’re talking about. Samsung Foundry or $LITE InP fab are completely different parts of the supply chain and this is like conflating NAND and DRAM as memory. Even talking about Sumitomo displacing AXT means they don’t understand the upstream extraction/processing/crucible bottlenecks that InP substrate level players like $COHR or Sumitomo don’t do. For $SIVE: This is mass inflection point of CPO scale up 2027 onwards. I have idiots out there with no understanding of photonics looking at gross margin, burn rate, and former revenue numbers for previous years or even the current year. For the biggest architectural inflection 2027 onwards. If you look at $MRVL Celestial point its starting volume ramp 2027 and exponentially increasing 2028, 2029. That’s why I said $SIVE can be a $10B+ company one day since it’s looking at forward growth and this is the earliest out on. What I do is find alpha: This is what markets might have mispriced like all the analysts saying 14-17% fwd growth with $RPI. Then I modeled 55% and it turned out to be 58%. One is a photonics bottleneck for a reason. The other is designed into Jabil and Celestial for a reason.
-
感谢支持，并表示对外界质疑的情绪只是发泄。
@futureproof_inv 感谢支持！ 越是你比别人更早看到一件事，收到的质疑和嘲讽就越多。 我最近因为 $RPI 这事从自己圈子外的人那里吃了太多烂话，所以这条更像是在发泄。
原推 ↗英文原文
@futureproof_inv Thanks for the support! It's always when you're earliest to something that you get the most criticism / doubt. I just got a ton of endless sht over $RPI from everyone outside my follower base, so this is just coming out as a rant.
-
认为自己关于 RPI 的 thesis 被财报验证，媒体和分析师都看错了。
甚至连普通分析师和记者都把 $RPI 叫成了“meme stock”。 我觉得这就是典型的事后偏差：我身边以外的大多数人都否定了这个 thesis。 不管怎样，财报终于验证了它。58% 的同比增长非常出色，我只是一直憋着这口气等财报出来。
原推 ↗英文原文
Even regular analysts called $RPI a "Meme Stock" on top of reporters. Think this is hindsight bias, vast majority of people outside my following dismissed the thesis. Regardless, finally vindicated from earnings. 58% Y/Y growth is phenomenal, just pent up frustration waiting for this report to come out.
-
批评媒体将$RPI误标为散户股，强调其58%增长修正后的基本面价值。
@GeneralMarketx FT和其他新闻媒体那些该死的家伙在用虚假标签制造恐慌。说这是$GME的“散户股领地”而非实际基本面。$RPI在58%的增长预估修正后可能会被大幅重新定价上涨。
原推 ↗英文原文
@GeneralMarketx Actual ****s over at FT, and other news outlets sparking panic with the false labels. Saying it was $GME "Meme stock territory" over actual fundamentals. $RPI is likely going to be repriced upward a lot after the 58% growth estimate revisions.
-
说自己正确看到了 RPI 的基本面变化，而外界曾嘲笑它是 meme。
@QGrowthCap 我就是很烦，X 和社交媒体上所有人都把它叫成“meme stock”。 可我说 $RPI 的基本面在变化，而且我判断对了。 现在他们都闭嘴了，然后才去更新自己对这只 AI fabless 股票的模型，而它当时的前瞻市盈率只有 19 倍。
原推 ↗英文原文
@QGrowthCap Just frustrating everyone on X and social media called it a "meme stock" When I called fundamental changes on $RPI and got it right. Now they're all silent, and then just updated their models on an AI fabless stock trading at fwd 19 P/E.
-
强调自己对 RPI 的收入预测被验证，市场随后上修增长预期。
兄弟，这也太离谱了……大家都在质疑我 $RPI，还叫它 “Meme Stock”？？ 我明明预测了 48-55% 的前瞻营收增长，而且是拿基本面支撑的。 可分析师都在说 14-17%，新闻媒体都在喊 “Meme Stock”？？ 结果财报后他们把 $RPI 的同比增长预期上调到了 58%。 完全命中，和 $AXTI 一样被验证了。 尤其是我还预测了行业会有 3-4 倍增长。 现在 $RPI 大约是 19 倍到 23.8 倍前瞻市盈率，而收入加速来自 OpenClaw。
原推 ↗英文原文
Bruh wtf... Everyone was doubting me on $RPI, calling it a "Meme Stock"??? I literally projected 48-55% forward revenue growth and backed it up with fundamentals. While all the analysts were saying 14-17% and news outlets were saying "Meme Stock"?? And they updated $RPI to 58% projected Y/Y growth after earnings. Spot on and vindicated like $AXTI. Especially when I projected 3-4X industry growth estimates. Now $RPI is at ~19x-23.8x fwd p/e, with revenue acceleration due to OpenClaw.
-
复盘自己最早关于 RPI / OpenClaw 的预测，以及分析师上修后股价反应。
我最早关于 $RPI 和 OpenClaw 垂直整合的帖子： “但如果需求流入继续，我们可能会看到营收从 14% 增长提高到 48-55% 的温和水平，只要囤货持续。” $RPI 新的分析师预测： 券商把 2026 年 $RPI 的预测从 3.6 亿美元上调到 5.11 亿美元，意味着同比增长 58%。 …… 媒体把我 thesis 里的“meme stock” $RPI，在预测上修后又涨了 27%。
原推 ↗英文原文
My original post on $RPI and OpenClaw vertaim: "But if the demand influx continues, we might see revenue numbers might hit increase from 14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues." $RPI New Analyst Projections: The broker raised its 2026 $RPI forecast to $511 million from $360 million, implying 58% year-on-year growth. .... The media labeled "Meme Stock" $RPI from my thesis is up 27% on the projections beat.
-
回应外界质疑，强调自己分享的是想法与回报，不需要靠炫富来证明。
谢谢你替我说话。去年我只有几百个关注者、发出 600%+ 收益时，大家都还挺支持的。 现在我有 10 万+ 关注后，反而多了无尽的嫉妒，或者一些莫名其妙的评论，比如： - “除非他们晒净资产，不然就是拿 2000 美元在交易”： 我不需要像其他网红那样发跑车或名表来证明自己是个好交易员。对我来说，最重要的是想法，而收益率已经证明了这些想法在市场里是对的。 - “拉盘砸盘”：几乎每只我持有的股票都保住了涨幅，比如 $AXTI 都涨了 500%+？我大部分收益其实还没兑现。 我从开始发帖以来，自己点名过的高信念标的，几乎都是绿的：$NBIS、$CRCL、$TSM、$RKLB、$HOOD、$ALAB、$CRDO。 也有一些新的，比如 $RDDT，但它现在也只回撤了大概 6-8%，还需要时间兑现。 还有一些更小的标的，比如 $LPTH 或 $VLN，虽然还没兑现，但从发帖以来也就跌了大约 10% 左右，具体取决于进场点，并不是因为它们基本面不好就直接崩掉。 我发的是几十只股票，所以拿其中几只还没跑出来的来代表我全部做过的东西，这真的很荒谬。如果你把所有标的等权平均，你会发现整体还是很绿的。 - “偷票”：很多这些股票都已经存在很多年了，过去也有成千上万的人做多过。 市场之所以对它们反应不同，是因为我在帖子里做了新的信息整合，或者我把它和一个别人没想到的催化剂联系了起来。 以前有人说他们先发现了 $OSS，但它之所以上涨，是因为我把它和委内瑞拉入侵联系起来了（这才是新的）。只是说一句“边缘 AI，看多 $OSS”其实什么都不说明。 以前有人说他们先发现了 $RPI，但它上涨的原因，是因为我第一个把它和 OpenClaw 的投资逻辑联系在一起（这才是新的）。光说“树莓派适合个人使用”也没什么意义。 例子还有很多，比如 $SOI、$SIVE，或者其他任何股票。 我也没说我是第一个发现 $TSEM 或 $NBIS 之类的人，那些本来就是大家都知道的光子代工厂或者 neocloud，我个人只是喜欢，也愿意跟着上车。 别人想怎么说都行，但市场才是真相的最终裁判。
原推 ↗英文原文
Thanks for coming to my defense. Last year when I posted 600%+ gains with a few hundred followers, everyone was supportive. Now that I have 100k+ followers, there's endless jealously or random comments like: - "Only trading with $2K unless they show net worth": I don't need to post lambos/fancy watches like other influencers to prove I'm a good trader. My opinion is ideas what matters the most, and the % return validates that they're correct in the market. - "Pump and Dump": Almost every stock held their gains like $AXTI is up 500%+? Most of my returns are unrealized. Every high conviction stock I've named over time since starting is green: $NBIS, $CRCL, $TSM, $RKLB, $HOOD, $ALAB, $CRDO. There's new ones like $RDDT but that's only down ~6-8% and needs time to play out. There's other smaller picks $LPTH or $VLN that haven't but they're only down like 10% from posting or more depending on entry point and don't just crash because they're all fundamentally good picks. I post tens of stocks, so cherry picking a few that haven't played out yet to represent everything I've done is just ridiculous. If people just take the equal weighted average of everything they're way green. - "Stealing Picks": Many of these stocks have been around for years. Thousands of different people have been long at one point in time. The reason markets react differently is I either bring novel information synthesis to a post, or I time it with a catalyst others don't. People were claiming they found $OSS first, but the reason it went up from $6 was because I linked it to Venezulea's invasion (which was novel). Just saying "edge AI, go long on $OSS doesn't mean anything". People were claiming they found $RPI first, but the reason it went up was because I was the first to link it OpenClaw as an investment thesis (which was novel). People claiming "raspberry pi for personal use doesn't mean anything". List goes on and on with $SOI or $SIVE or any other stock. I'm not claiming I'm the first either to stuff like $TSEM or $NBIS either, that's already a well known photonics foundry or neocloud, I personally just liked it and wanted to hop ont he bandwagon. People can say anything they want but markets are the final arbiter of truth.
-
表示自己从没放弃对 RPI 的期待，并很高兴它开始被更多分析师关注。
我从来没放弃过我的“龙虾搭档” $RPI。 很高兴看到现在终于有其他分析师开始关注它了。 https://t.co/koaLfw15Gs
原推 ↗英文原文
I never gave up hope in my lobster companion $RPI. Glad to see it’s finally getting some attention by other analysts. https://t.co/koaLfw15Gs
-
指出本地模型不直接跑在树莓派上，而是把 picoclaw / openclaw 等当作编排器。
@MingleSach 你不会直接在 Raspberry Pi 上跑本地模型。你会把 picoclaw / openclaw 之类的东西当作编排器去移植。
原推 ↗英文原文
@MingleSach You don’t run local models on raspberry pi. You port picoclaw/openclaw/etc. as an orchestrator.
-
年初回顾自己在光子瓶颈、AXTI、EWY、RPI、IQE、Soitec 和 Venezuela 相关判断上的一系列兑现。
只是回顾一下我今年的成绩。 2026 年前三个月，粉丝增长到 10 万+： - 预判了光子学即将出现的 InP 基板 / 原料瓶颈 - 识别出 $AXTI 是主要受益者（涨了 4 倍+） - 中国突然对日本实施即时出口管制，针对 InP 化合物 -> 在我那篇识别中国瓶颈以及住友 / 超大规模云脆弱性的 thesis 后没多久，这篇还拿了几百万浏览…… 我也不确定他们是不是看过我的帖子，如果看过，抱歉？ - 预测了韩国市场波动上升，并把它映射成和 $EWY 有关的 IV 套利交易想法 - 一周后就被韩国央行关于即将到来的波动的表态验证了 - Bloomberg、Reuters、FT 以及其他媒体都引用了我关于 $RPI 的 thesis 帖 - 很多欧洲媒体也在谈为什么我看好 $IQE - 还有一堆法国新闻网站，以及 Citi、Kepler 的分析师，围绕我那篇关于 Soitec（$SOI）的 TLDR thesis 帖发出了略带强势的研究意见 - 识别出委内瑞拉政局变化的主要受益者，比如 Gold Reserve，而且这只股票第二天就涨了 100%+ - 还发了关于委内瑞拉可能持有多少比特币的信息整合，结果被 CNN 等媒体大量报道！ 我其他很多 thesis 帖，比如 $LITE，也在今年随着我对 $GOOGL TPU BOM 的映射，以及两次加倍后兑现了。 但这些都没上面那些酷！ 短短两个月里！我喜欢保持谦虚，但偶尔也想吹一吹。 最棒的是，这次零售投资者因为 X 上的信息发现和免费传播，几乎都提前参与了很多趋势。 很期待未来会发生什么，也很高兴 X 给了我机会分享想法。
原推 ↗英文原文
Just a reflection on my accomplishments this year. Growing to 100K+ followers in the first three months of 2026: - Forecasted the upcoming InP substrate/feedstock bottleneck for photonics - Identified $AXTI as the main beneficiary (up 4x+) - China's suddenly enforced immediate export controls on Japan, targeting InP compounds -> shortly after my thesis identifying the China bottleneck and Sumitomo/hyperscaler vulnerabilities got a few million views... Not sure if they read my post, sorry if they did? - Predicted volatility increase of the South Korean Market and also mapped that into an IV arbitrage trade idea with $EWY - Got it spot on a week later with the Bank of Korea citing upcoming volatility - Had Bloomberg, Reuters, FT, and other news outlets citing my thesis post about $RPI - Bunch of European news sites talking about why I like $IQE - Had a bunch of French news sites and analysts from Citi, Kepler, putting out slightly aggressive notes about my Soitec ( $SOI ) TLDR thesis post. - Identified the main beneficiaries of Venezuela regime change like Gold Reserve, with the stock going up 100%+ the day after. - Published information synthesis on how much Bitcoin Venezuela might have had, and it blew up with a ton of media coverage like CNN and others! Lot of my other thesis posts like $LITE ended up playing out this year after mapping out $GOOGL TPU BOM and doubling. But it's not as cool as the ones above! In just two months! I like to stay humble, but I do want to brag from time to time. And best of all, retail investors were all early to a lot of these trends this time because of information discovery + free distribution over X. Excited to see what's to come in the future and I'm happy X gave me this opportunity to share my thoughts.
-
感谢媒体覆盖 Soitec，并确认自己的核心论点
这次终于感谢 MarketScreener 对 $SOI 的真实报道。 文章写道： “在专门讨论 Soitec 的帖子里，作者提出了几个论点。他认为，该集团可能受益于 CPO（共封装光学）的发展，而 CPO 是为伴随人工智能和数据中心崛起而设计的一种光子架构。根据他的说法，Soitec 在该技术所用的某些 SOI 衬底上拥有近乎垄断的地位，如果光子技术被大规模采用，这一优势可能变得具有战略意义。该投资者还提到，他认为估值水平偏低，并相信到 2027 年，市场可能会开始提前布局一个对光子技术有前景的周期。” 这其实就是我原来的 thesis，没有多余修饰。 上一次 FT 和 Bloomberg 报道我的 $RPI 论点时，他们莫名其妙给贴上“meme stock”的标签，还硬加了不少我根本没说过的话，直接带来负面情绪。 不过话说回来： $SOI 基本上是 CPO 衬底层上的虚拟垄断。 未来一两年我会继续持有，因为我预计它会成为 $NVDA 主导的下一轮架构起量中的最大受益者。
原推 ↗英文原文
Thank you MarketScreener for actual coverage of $SOI this time. The article writes: “In the post dedicated to Soitec, the author puts forward several arguments. He believes that the group could benefit from the development of CPO (co-packaged optics), a photonic architecture designed to accompany the rise of artificial intelligence and data centers. According to him, Soitec would have a quasi-monopolistic position on certain SOI substrates used in this technology, an advantage that could become strategic if photonics is adopted on a large scale. The investor also mentions a valuation level that he considers low and believes that the market could begin to position itself ahead of a promising cycle for photonics by 2027” This was exactly the thesis, no extra fluff. Last time media from FT and Bloomberg covered my thesis on $RPI, they labeled it a “meme-stock” out of nowhere. With many outlets straight up adding words never stated, which triggered negative sentiment. That being said: $SOI is a virtual monopoly over the substrate layer for CPO. I plan to hold my positions over the next year or two, as I expect it to be the largest beneficiary of the upcoming architectural ramp spearheaded by $NVDA.
-
博主更正 $RPI 涨幅数据，承认其表现严重滞后。
@leglock140448 我的错，$RPI 自上月发帖以来仅上涨 18.2%，并未翻倍。它是表现严重滞后的股票之一。https://t.co/Ww00UZhb3U
原推 ↗英文原文
@leglock140448 My bad $RPI is only up 18.2% since posting last month instead of doubling. One of the heavy underperformers. https://t.co/Ww00UZhb3U
-
RPI 3月财报见需求，AI智能体热潮助其营收增长。
谢谢！$RPI 的走向尚不明朗，3 月财报后我们将看到更多关于实际需求的可见性。感觉我每天都在看到 OpenClaw 的帖子，只要 AI 智能体(AI Agent)保持流行且需要用于编排的独立硬件，它就会获得收入顺风。
原推 ↗英文原文
Thanks! No clue where $RPI heads, we’ll get to see more visibility into actualized demand after earnings in March. Feels like I’m still seeing openclaw posts every day so as long as AI agent are popular + isolated hardware for orchestration is needed, will get it a revenue tailwind
-
看好光子、存储、电力及国防板块，分享具体标的及轮动策略。
光子学、存储、电力和国防可能是目前势头最强的前3大板块。 其他如先进封装或散热等板块，恕我直言，你无法获得像前四大板块那样严重的瓶颈效应或回报。 $AAOI 和 $AXTI 是我最看好的两个光子学标的。 三星和 SK 海力士是存储领域的两大首选。 关于电力，我之前已经说过 $XLU，受益于降息+电网现代化+超大规模云厂商推理需求。 然后是国防，可能是 $LASR 等，因为伊朗冲突是最大的催化剂之一。（并持仓直到和平时期到来） 我通常轮动操作约30只股票，所以像 $RDDT 这样的股票我在做波段交易，而像 $RPI 这样我之前提过的股票，我只是作为低仓位的备用持仓，以防我的逻辑被证实正确。 其中很大一部分是在顺势而为。
原推 ↗英文原文
Photonics, Memory, Power, and Defense are probably the top 3 momentum sectors right now. There’s others like advanced packaging or thermal but you won’t get to the severe bottleneck or returns as top 4 imo. $AAOI and $AXTI are top two favorite photonic plays. Samsung and SK Hynix are top two memory plays. Power I’ve already said $XLU from rate cuts + grid modernization + hyperscaler inference. Then defense probably $LASR and others for a bit since the Iran conflict is one of the biggest catalysts. (And hanging around until there’s peacetime) I usually rotate around 30 or so stocks, so one others like $RDDT I’ve been swing trading and others I’ve mentioned in the past like $RPI I just hold on the side with less concentration in case my thesis turns out right. Large part of it is riding the momentum.
-
感谢关注，认为OpenClaw是$RPI的长期催化剂。
@bulldogcapital9 谢谢！看到关于 $RPI 的新闻报道真的很有趣。希望 OpenClaw 能成为一个良好的长期催化剂。https://t.co/rTgP8DNDZn
原推 ↗英文原文
@bulldogcapital9 Thanks! It's really fun to see the news coverage around $RPI. Hope OpenClaw serves as a good long term catalyst. https://t.co/rTgP8DNDZn
-
RPI逆势上涨，软件与网络安全板块表现疲软
@otium33 也许吧，但即使被媒体贴上“迷因股(meme stock)”标签的 $RPI 今天也上涨了 13.6%。 看起来软件和网络安全(cybersecurity)等其他主题表现不佳 https://t.co/wUISCQP55H
原推 ↗英文原文
@otium33 Maybe, but even the media branded “meme stock” $RPI is up 13.6% today. Seems like other themes like software and cybersecurity aren’t doing too well https://t.co/wUISCQP55H
-
驳斥媒体将$RPI误读为迷因股，重申其受AI需求驱动的实质基本面逻辑。
媒体将“迷因股(Meme Stock)”$RPI 的涨幅归为此类，该股本月已上涨 46.12% 并守住收益。硅谷人士都穿龙虾(Lobster)服装时，你是否曾思考过 OpenClaw 需求是否存在结构性变化？ 《每日电讯报》今天发布了一篇关于树莓派(Raspberry Pi, $RPI) 的新文章。虽然我很感激被称为“AI 极客(AI Nerd)”…… 但我不理解为什么他们共同试图将树莓派框架化为“迷因股(Meme stock)？” 整个论点(Thesis) 是围绕 OpenClaw 变体作为首选硬件带来的总可寻址市场(TAM) 扩张。 在财务方面，论点在于如果囤货持续，收入数字如何能从预期的“14% 增长”增加到“适度的 48-55%”。 我原始论点的直接引用是：这将是“反转的顺风(tailwind for a reversal)”，且“收入应受益于需求增加”。 这是逐字引用的。 我不理解像《金融时报》这样的媒体机构如何能从上述内容 -> 变成从未说过的虚假评论。 对于《金融时报》：他们插入了关于“可被框架化为对立面(big shorts)的大空头”的虚假评论。 对于《每日电讯报》：他们插入了诸如“对公司本身的喜爱而非财务表现或潜力”的虚假评论。 我不确定大型媒体机构为何不被要求更高的标准，却能随意捏造评论？ 再次强调，$AAPL Mac Mini 作为 AI 编排(AI orchestration)硬件的囤货不会对苹果收入（作为一家 3.7 万亿美元市值的公司）造成显著影响。 然而，这对像 $RPI 这样的公司是实质性的(material)。 这就是核心论点。 OpenClaw 和 AI 智能体/集群(AI agents/swarms) 驱动树莓派销量的增加（更重要的是，作为长期催化剂），这可能导致收入预测超预期(beat) + 重估(re-rating)。 多家机构包括添加捏造评论的框架极其不真诚(disingenuous)。 这是一个基本的、高度具体的论点，但多家媒体机构只是决定捏造完全随机的内容，将树莓派描绘为迷因股。
原推 ↗英文原文
The media labeled “Meme Stock” $RPI has held its gains, and is up 46.12% this month. Ever stop to wonder if there’s something structural with OpenClaw demand if everyone in Silicon Valley is dressing up in Lobster Costumes? https://t.co/IkR5BXn2dd
-
澄清持有RPI基于财务逻辑，反对将其视为迷因股。
是的，我持有 $RPI。它在我投资组合中的占比非常小。 让我感到愤怒的是这种观点：“对公司本身的喜爱胜过其财务表现或潜力”。 整个投资逻辑（Thesis）都是围绕从收入增长到总可服务市场（TAM）的未定价财务数据展开的。 我宁愿看到像树莓派（Raspberry Pi）这样盈利的无晶圆厂半导体（Fabless Semi）公司，不要仅仅因为媒体想要编造故事而变成一只迷因股（Meme Stock）。
原推 ↗英文原文
Yes I own $RPI. It’s a very small weighting in my portfolio. What gets me riled up is this: "fondness for the company itself rather than financial performance or potential". The whole thesis was around unpriced financials from revenue growth to TAM. I’d rather not have a profitable fabless semi like Raspberry Pi turn into a meme stock just because the media wants to make something up.
-
批评大型期刊编造关于$RPI的虚假评论。
是的，我原本期望大型期刊能有更好的表现，而不是编造评论。这相当于我说《金融时报》是一本无人重视的知名梗图期刊，因为他们的一位编辑曾去过游戏驿站(GameStop)。即便这样说，可能也比他们关于 $RPI 编造的评论更接近事实。
原推 ↗英文原文
Yeah, I expected better from large journals instead of making up commentary. It’s the equivalent of me saying “Financial Times” is a well known meme journal nobody takes seriously because the one of their editors visited gamestop before. Even with that statement it’s probably more true than the commentary they made up about $RPI
-
嘲笑媒体错误对比RPI与DELL市盈率，批评评论员不专业。
@britplay 今天《金融时报》(FT) 又有一篇试图将 $RPI 与 $DELL 的市盈率(P/E)进行比较的文章，我简直笑出声来。显然，许多市场评论员根本不知道自己在说什么。
原推 ↗英文原文
@britplay There was another one from FT today trying to compare P/E ratios with $RPI to $DELL and I just burst out laughing. Clearly a lot of the market writers have no clue what they’re talking about
-
澄清媒体误将$RPI基本面逻辑扭曲为迷因股炒作。
《每日电讯报》今天发布了一篇关于树莓派（$RPI）的新文章。 虽然我很感激被称为“AI极客”…… 但我不理解为什么媒体普遍试图将树莓派框架化为“迷因股（Meme stock）”？ 整个论点（Thesis）的核心是：随着OpenClaw变体成为首选硬件，总可寻址市场（TAM）正在扩张。 在财务方面，论点在于如果囤货持续，营收数字如何能从预期的14%增长提升至温和的48-55%。 我原始论点中的直接引语是：这将是“反转的顺风（tailwind for a reversal）”，且“营收应受益于需求增加”。 这是逐字引用的。 我不理解像《金融时报》这样的媒体机构如何能从上述内容转变为从未说过的虚假评论。 对于《金融时报》：他们插入了关于“可被框架化为对立面的大型空头”的虚假评论。 对于《每日电讯报》：他们插入了诸如“对公司本身的喜爱而非财务表现或潜力”的虚假评论。 我不确定大型媒体机构为何不被要求更高的标准，却能随意捏造评论？ 再次强调，$AAPL Mac Mini作为AI编排（orchestration）硬件的囤货不会对苹果营收造成显著影响（因为它是3.7万亿美元市值的公司）。 然而，这对像$RPI这样的公司是实质性的（material）。 这就是核心论点。 OpenClaw和AI代理/集群（swarms）驱动树莓派销量增加（更重要的是，作为长期催化剂），这可能导致营收预测超预期+重估（re-rating）。 多家媒体机构极其不诚实地进行框架化，包括添加捏造的评论。 这是一个基本面、高度具体的论点，但多家媒体机构决定完全随机地捏造内容，将树莓派描绘成迷因股。
原推 ↗英文原文
The Telegraph put out a new piece today about Raspberry Pi ( $RPI ) While I appreciate being called an "AI Nerd"... I don't understand why they all in common try and frame Raspberry Pi as a "Meme stock?" The whole thesis was around TAM expansion from OpenClaw variants as the hardware of choice. For financials, it was how revenue numbers could increase beyond projected numbers from "14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues." Direct quote from my original thesis: this would be a "tailwind for a reversal" and "revenue should benefit from increased demand". This was verbatim. I don't understand how media outlets like Financial Times can go from that -> into fake commentary that was never said. For FT: they inserted false commentary about "big shorts that can be frame as opposition" For The Telegraph: they inserted false commentary like "fondness for the company itself rather than financial performance or potential". I'm not sure how large media outlets aren't held to higher standards and are able to just make up commentary? Once again, $AAPL Mac Mini as AI orchestration hardware hoarding wouldn't make a dent on Apple revenue (as it's a $3.7T company). However, it's material to a company like $RPI. That's the core thesis. OpenClaw and AI agents/swarms drives an increase in sales of Raspberry PI (and better yet, as a long term cataylst), which would likely cause revenue projection beats + re-rating. Extremely disingenuous framing by multiple outlets, including adding made-up commentary. This was a fundamental, highly-specific argument, but multiple media outlets just decided to make up something completely random to paint Raspberry Pi as a Meme Stock.
-
博主复盘YTD 316%收益，分享交易策略、核心持仓优势及免费分享初衷。
年初至今：316.4% 从2026年1月到2026年2月。 对我短期交易和多头持仓的回顾： > 年初对像 $GLXY、$SMCI 和 $IREN 这样进行税务收割(tax harvested)的股票进行波段交易(swing traded) > 搭乘委内瑞拉股票从 Gold Reserve、$AVAV 到 $CVX（看涨期权）上涨的顺风车 > 在战争入侵后买入像 $LPTH、$OSS、$AIRO 这样的国防股，以及受“跟随领导者”催化剂驱动的 $ONDS > 对 $INTC 进行催化剂交易，并正确把握了财报时机。 > 因对线色变化(wire color change)的担忧而对 $CRDO 进行波段交易 > 在超大规模客户损失(hyperscaler client losses)被错误报道后对 $MRVL 进行波段交易 > 像 $META 一样正确预判了财报 > 在 $NBIS 和 $CIFR 大幅抛售至 $70 和 $11 时，通过保证金(margin)加仓 > 从 $HOOD 下跌到 $CRDO 下跌再到复苏的过程中进行波段交易。 > 在比特币跌至 $73k 时买入，并在 $62k 时大量使用保证金博取复苏 > 像 $ETOR 这样的复苏股在抛售和财报后表现良好。 > 正确把握了像 $RPI 这样的公司的催化剂 > 利用亚洲股票与欧洲/美国时区之间的时间滞后套利(time lag arbitrages) > 利用 $EWY 和其他指数的隐含波动率扩张(IV expansion) > 把握轮动进入电力/电网股如 $XLU 的时机，目前正对像 $RDDT 这样的股票进行波段交易， 我肯定漏掉了一些，但这些是我主要发布的内容！ 此外，我会进行日内交易(day trade)： 例如 $ORCL 因发行导致8%抛售后的复苏，或 $SOFI 因无关紧要的卖方降级导致随机10%抛售。 我不在主时间线发布这些内容，因为我不想影响人们的买卖决策。 只想提供方向性思路，让人们得出自己的结论。 除此之外，我很高兴今天一切都上涨了，包括我的对冲(hedges)头寸。 与此同时，我的核心多头组合来自： - 从 SK Hynix 到 $AXTI 的光子学(Photonics)和存储，以及像 $AEHR 和 $FORM 这样的供应链瓶颈，其表现远超 Burry 的 $PLTR 每年 $415 的回报。 - 来自韩国/日本股票如 Nittobo、Kioxia 和 Unimicron 的多头持仓，有力支撑了美股回撤。 并非我组合中的所有股票都是绿色的，如 $CRCL、$CPSH、$VLN、$NBIS 或最近的 $INFQ。 但重要的是绿色持仓的集中度高于红色。与此同时，SPY 年初至今仅为 .55%，大多数高贝塔(high beta)股票年初至今大幅下跌。 我也不希望大家跟随我所有的操作，因为板块轮动、期权套利和基板瓶颈(substrate bottlenecks)很难消化。由于我也根据宏观/财报催化剂在约30只股票之间轮动，而大多数人只关注几只并持有数年。 但是，当2025年第四季度的短期回撤（如果人们买了短期期权）出错时，确实让人难受，直到现在才恢复超过平均成本。 然而，我对核心多头如 $NBIS 最终将大幅跑赢市场非常有信心。 希望大家能从中获得一两个有趣的交易思路或学到一些东西！ —— 只是有些反思，我认为我最近受欢迎的一个原因是我没有试图推销任何东西。这也不是我的全职工作（我经营一家科技公司），我只是出于乐趣做这件事，所以对最近的受欢迎程度感到非常惊讶。 我认为我的优势可能是信息综合与映射 -> 发现市场遗漏的阿尔法(alpha) -> 转化为金融科技和半导体领域的可执行多头思路。 与发布突发新闻或擅长拆解一两只特定股票的账户相比。 无论如何，我免费发布所有想法只是为了在能帮助他人时获得满足感。 所以，人们觉得我的想法有趣或信号足够强而愿意倾听，这让我心存感激。
原推 ↗英文原文
Year to Date: 316.4% From January 2026 into February 2026. Reflection of my short term trades and longs: > Swing traded tax harvested stocks like $GLXY, $SMCI, and $IREN start of the year > Rode Venezuela stocks from Gold Reserve, $AVAV, to $CVX (calls) up > Bought into defense like $LPTH, $OSS, $AIRO after invasion from war + $ONDS “follow the leader” catalyst > Catalyst traded $INTC and timed earnings correctly. > Swing traded $CRDO off wire color change fears > Swing traded $MRVL after erroneous reporting on hyperscaler client losses > Got earnings right like $META > Portfolio margined into $NBIS and $CIFR on the major selloff to $70 and $11. > Swing trades things from $HOOD drop to $CRDO drop into recovery. > Bought Bitcoin dip to $73k and heavy margin on $62k into recovery > Recovery plays like $ETOR after selloff and ER helped. > Getting catalysts on companies like $RPI correct > Time lag arbitrages between Asian equities and European/US time zones. > IV expansion off $EWY and other indexes. > Timing rotation into power/grids like $XLU and currently swing trading stuff like $RDDT, I’m sure I missed a bunch but these were the main ones I posted about! On the side I would day trade: Eg. $ORCL 8% selloff from offering into recovery or random 10% selloffs on immaterial $SOFI sellside downgrades. I don’t post stuff like these on my main timeline since I don’t want to influence when people buy/sell. Just want to give directional ideas and let people come to their own conclusions. Aside from that I’m happy everything went up today, including my hedges. This is all while my core long portfolio from: - Photonics and memory from SK Hynix to $AXTI to supply chain bottlenecks like $AEHR and $FORM have been mogging Burry’s $PLTR $415/year returns. - Longs from Korean/Japanese equities like Nittobo, Kioxia, and Unimicron have hard carried US equity drawdowns. Not everything in my portfolio is green like $CRCL, $CPSH, $VLN, $NBIS or recently $INFQ. But what matters is you have more concentration in green than red. This is all while SPY is YTD: .55% and most high beta stocks are heavily red YTD. I also don’t want people to follow along everything since sector rotation, option arbitrage, and substrate bottlenecks are hard to digest. Since I also rotate around like 30 different stocks based on macro/earning catalysts, whereas most people focus on a few and hold on for years. But it does hurt when more if get something wrong with short term drawdowns from Q4 2025 (if people bought short term options) and it’s only now recovered past cost average. However, I’m extremely confident in core longs like $NBIS to strongly outperform in due time. Hopefully people can take away one or two trade ideas that they find interesting or learn something! —— Just some reflection, i think a reason for my recent popularity is I’m not trying to sell anything. This is also not my full time job (I run a tech company) and I was just doing this for enjoyment, so very surprised by the recent popularity. I do think my edge is probably information synthesis and mapping -> discovering alpha markets missed -> into actionable long ideas across fintech and semis. Compared to accounts that publish breaking news or excel in breakdowns of one or two specific stocks. Regardless, I publish all my ideas for free just to get fulfillment if I can help others. So it does bring me gratitude that people find my ideas interesting or high-signal enough to listen.
-
反驳FT将$RPI归为迷因股，强调其基本面驱动及OpenClaw需求带来的实质影响。
《金融时报》关于 $RPI 的报道似乎别有用心。特别是将“树莓派(Raspberry Pi)”框定为“迷因股(Meme stock)”的做法。 1. 文中对空头(shorts)只字未提。 2. 这与 $GME 的逼空+持有“迷因股”叙事完全无关。 这是由实质性营收变化驱动的资金流入(informed flow)。 尤其是当树莓派已经是一家盈利公司时。 我原话如下： “ - 营收约 2.8 亿 -3 亿美元 - 毛利润(Gross Profit)约 7500 万美元以上 - 毛利率(Gross Margin)约 25% - 净利润(Net income)：约 1000 万 -1500 万美元 - 净现金(Net Cash)：2800 万美元” 分析师目前预测营收增长接近 14-17%。 但如果需求涌入持续，随着囤货行为继续，营收增速可能从 14% 跃升至温和的 48-55%。 ” $AAPL Mac mini 已知被囤积用于 OpenClaw 部署。但苹果设备采购对这家 3.7 万亿美元市值的公司影响微乎其微。 $RPI 是 OpenClaw 智能体编排(agentic orchestration)的另一款首选硬件，导致需求激增。 但由于市值较小，需求激增确实会产生实质性影响。 这纯粹是基本面营收增长和新可寻址市场(new addressable market)。 在完全未提及空头的情况下，将其框定为围绕挤压对手空头的 $GME 式反弹，是别有用心的。
原推 ↗英文原文
The Financial Times piece on $RPI seems disingenuous. Especially the framing of "Raspberry Pi" as a Meme stock. 1. There's been 0 mentions about shorts 2. It's completely unrelated to $GME's short squeeze + hold "meme-stock" narratives. This is informed flow from material revenue changes. Especially when Raspberry Pi is an already profitable company. My exact quote verbatim: " - ~$280M- $300M revenue - ~$75M+ Gross Profit - ~25% Gross Margin - Net income: ~$10M - $15M - Net Cash: $28M" Analysts currently project revenue growth closer to 14–17%. But if the demand influx continues, we might see revenue numbers might hit increase from 14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues. " $AAPL mac minis has been known to be hoarded for OpenClaw deployments. But Apple devices purchases have little material impact on a $3.7T company. $RPI is the other leading hardware of choice for OpenClaw agentic orchestration, causing a surge of demand. But due to the market cap, a surge in demand increase does have a material impact. This is purely fundamental revenue increases and a new addressable market. Framing it as $GME-type rally around squeezing opposition shorts, when there's been 0 mentions of shorts whatsoever is disingenuous.
-
看好$RPI独特市场机会，关注其执行效率。
@tech_signals 是的，我对 @Raspberry_Pi 也有同样的想法。 $RPI 拥有极其独特的市场机会和总可服务市场(TAM)。如果他们采纳你的建议并付诸行动，就能轻松利用这股势头。 我不确定英国公司是否能像美国超大规模云服务商(Hyperscalers)那样行动迅速，但让我们拭目以待。
原推 ↗英文原文
@tech_signals Yes I was thinking the same thing for @Raspberry_Pi. $RPI has an extremely unique market opportunity and TAM. They could easy capitalize on the momentum with your suggestion, if they act on it. I’m not sure if UK companies move as fast as US hyperscalers but we’ll see.
-
RPI 受 OpenClaw 影响波动剧烈，虽仍处下跌趋势但值得关注后续走向。
是的，成交量确实惊人，OpenClaw 确实给某些股票带来了很多关注。 如果 $RPI 能回到每天波动几个点的状态，我会更安心。连续两天上涨 28% 有点太疯狂了。 话虽如此，即使有了新的 OpenClaw 催化剂，它自去年以来仍下跌了 31%，但很好奇它接下来会走向何方。
原推 ↗英文原文
Yeah the volume is insane, OpenClaw really brings a lot of attention to certain stocks. I’d be more relieved if $RPI starts going back to moving a few percent a day. Having back to back 28% increases is a bit wild. That being said even with the new OpenClaw catalysts, it’s still down 31% since last year, but curious to see where it heads.
-
媒体引用其树莓派AI硬件论点，看好代理式AI本地编排趋势。
很酷，《卫报》引用了我关于树莓派(Raspberry Pi)的论点。 先是路透社，然后是彭博社、经济时报，现在轮到《卫报》了！ OpenClaw🦞真的病毒式传播，彻底改变了关于树莓派($RPI)和MiniMax(HKG: 0100)的叙事。 随着OpenAI的收购，看起来代理式AI(agentic AI)和本地编排(local orchestration)硬件只会从这里开始增长。 我只是在评论人们视而不见的结构性转变，正如我们进入AI应用的新前沿。
原推 ↗英文原文
It’s cool “The Guardian” cited my thesis on Raspberry Pi. First Reuters, then Bloomberg, Economic Times, and now The Guardian! OpenClaw🦞 really went viral and transformed the narrative on Raspberry Pi ( $RPI ) and Minimax (HKG: 0100). Following the OpenAI acquisition, it looks like agentic AI and local orchestration hardware is only growing from here. I’m just commentating on structural shifts people miss in plain sight, as we enter a new frontier in AI applications.
-
OpenClaw催化$RPI大涨，市场重估其作为AI智能体硬件领导者的潜力。
$RPI 又上涨了 27.47%。 OpenClaw 是主要催化剂： 展示了人们对树莓派（Raspberry Pi）的狂热追捧，其具备 -廉价 -可大规模生产 -隔离硬件 的特点，非常适合扩展 AI 智能体编排和集群。 市场正在结构性重估树莓派，将其视为这一新型智能体硬件市场的潜在领导者。 通过 AI 智能体在互联网上智能自动化人类行为，其规模涵盖 -1000人 -1000万人 -1万亿人 这是一个全新的市场规模（TAM）概念。 随着不同版本的 OpenClaw 和树莓派的出现，我们首次见证了这种真实的可能性。
原推 ↗英文原文
$RPI is now up another 27.47%. OpenClaw is the primary catalyst: Demonstrating a Raspberry Pi frenzy for -cheap -mass producible -isolated hardware that is ideal for scaling AI agent orchestration and swarms. Markets are structurally re-rating Raspberry Pi as the potential leader for this new market category of agentic hardware. Intelligently automating human behavior across the internet representing -1000 people -10 million people - 1 trillion people with AI agents is a scale and TAM that is extremely new to think about. And we’re witnessing that real possibility for the first time with different OpenClaw versions and Raspberry Pi.
-
澄清树莓派在AI部署中的成本优势及生态护城河，看好其B2B市场扩张。
我认为这忽略了细微差别，我来解释一下： 将台式电脑级别的 N150 迷你主机与树莓派(Raspberry Pi)进行比较时存在性能谬误。新的基于 AI 智能体(AI Agent)的部署优化的是每个隔离节点的成本，而非原始计算性能。 至于其他竞争对手如 Orange Pi，树莓派拥有生态系统护城河。Orange Pi 的开发者生态系统简直是噩梦。 例如：“完全缺乏支持，Orange Pi 基本已死”。 这就是为什么人们默认选择树莓派，因为大家都在围绕它进行开发，且极其稳定。 至于教育/爱好者市场，消费者约占收入的 1/3。当人们扩展数十甚至数百个隔离的 $RPI 硬件部署（包括 B2B 用例）时，总可寻址市场(TAM)大幅扩张。 但回到前面的观点，这相当于选择 iPhone 还是某款性能基准更好的亚洲手机。
原推 ↗英文原文
I think that's missing the nuance, will help explain: There's a performance fallacy when you compare desktop-like N150 mini PCs with raspberry pis. New AI agent based deployments optimize around for cost per isolated node, not raw compute performance. As for other competitors like Orange Pi, there's a ecosystem moat around Raspberry Pis. Orange Pis is a nightmare developer ecosystem. Eg: "Total lack of support, OrangePi is basically dead" That's why people defaults to Raspberry PIs, since everyone's been developing around them + extremely stable. As for education/hobbyist, consumer is ~1/3rd of the revenue. TAM just expanded immensely when people scale up tens or possibly hundreds of isolated $RPI hardware deployments, including for B2B use cases. But going back to the earlier point, it's the equivalent of choosing an iphone vs. some phone from Asia that has better performance benchmarks.
-
MiniMax和RPI是OpenClaw交易最大受益者，需研究S。
@Baltachi_com 我认为 OpenClaw 交易最大的两个受益者其实是 MiniMax (HKG: 0100) 和 $RPI，两者都上涨了约 60%。 其余如 $AAPL（可能还有 $TWLO）体量太大，难以产生实质性影响。 需要研究一下 $S。
原推 ↗英文原文
@Baltachi_com I'd say the two biggest beneficiaries of the OpenClaw trade is actually Minimax (HKG: 0100) and $RPI, which are both up ~60% together. The rest like $AAPL are a bit too big (and probably $TWLO ) to make a material impact. Will need to take a look into $S.
-
机构验证树莓派转型AI基建，CEO回购，后续看执行。
彭博社关于树莓派（$RPI）及 OpenClaw/PicoClaw/NanoClaw 论点的报道： 在对 Montanaro Asset Management 基金经理 Adam Montanaro 的采访中： “从主题上看，树莓派从爱好者开发板演变为 AI 基础设施的核心组件，这一趋势是正确的。” 彭博社的 Henry Ren 也表示： “树莓派的另一个利好是，创始人兼首席执行官 Eben Upton 近期频繁回购股票，文件显示自 1 月下旬以来他已分五次买入。” 很高兴看到机构验证了树莓派从教育类爱好者开发板向 AI 硬件编排核心基础设施的转型。 话虽如此，其余部分取决于公司能否通过执行落地，在 AI 智能体（AI Agents）领域拓展其新的总可服务市场（TAM）。
原推 ↗英文原文
Bloomberg on the Raspberry Pi ( $RPI ) and the OpenClaw / PicoClaw / NanoClaw thesis: In their interview with Adam Montanaro, a fund manager at Montanaro Asset Management: "Thematically the evolution of a Raspberry Pi from hobbyist board into a core piece of AI infrastructure is correct" Henry Ren from Bloomberg also stated: "Another positive for Raspberry Pi has been a rash of share purchases by founder and Chief Executive Officer Eben Upton, who has bought stock on five separate occasions since late January, filings show." It's great to see institutional validation of Raspberry Pi's transition from educational hobbyist boards into core infrastructure for AI hardware orchestration. That being said, the rest depends on the company's execution to grow into their new TAM with AI agents.
-
看好$RPI在AI边缘计算中的早期势头及市场机会，决定顺势参与。
谢谢，$RPI 目前捕捉到了早期的势头。特别是随着 OpenClaw 的轻量级版本（如 picoclaw/nanoclaw）的出现。我们正目睹总可寻址市场(TAM)的巨大扩张，类似于 $NVDA 从游戏 GPU 向 AI GPU 转型时的场景。但在上游更广泛的内存供应受限背景下，执行力才是真正捕获该 TAM 的关键。我不确定这会演变成短期的病毒式潮流，还是在一年后在树莓派上部署 AI 编排(AI Orchestration)仍将是标准做法。但我看到了市场机会，所以我会顺势而为，看看事态如何发展。
原推 ↗英文原文
Thank you, $RPI has captured the early momentum right now. Especially with lighter OpenClaw versions like picoclaw/nanoclaw. We're seeing a massive TAM expansion like when $NVDA transitioned from GPUs for gaming to GPUs for AI. But execution is what matters the most to actually capture that TAM while there's broader memory supply constraints upstream. No clue how this turns out whether it's a short term viral trend or if deploying AI orchestration on Raspberry Pi remains the standard 1 year out. But I see the market opportunity, so I'm along for the ride to see where it goes.
-
树莓派因AI智能体编排需求激增，正从教育公司重估为AI硬件公司。
很高兴我的 $RPI x OpenClaw 🦞 论点被路透社报道。 树莓派（Raspberry Pi）廉价教育板的市场规模（TAM）一夜之间扩大了。 因为它们已成为 $AAPL Mac Mini 的更廉价标准，用于 AI 智能体编排（AI Agent Orchestration）+ AI 集群（AI Swarms）。 树莓派在廉价板卡领域拥有事实上的垄断地位，因为它们最初针对的是教育用途。 几乎没有公司有需求（或动力）在该领域与之竞争。 市场目前正在重新评估一家曾经只卖 1-2 块板用于测试的教育公司。 将其视为一家销售可大规模生产的 AI 智能体编排板卡的 AI 硬件公司。
原推 ↗英文原文
Glad my $RPI x OpenClaw 🦞thesis made it to Reuters. Raspberry Pi’s cheap educational boards had a TAM expansion overnight. As they’ve become the cheaper standard for AI Agent Orchestration + AI Swarms alongside the $AAPL Mac Mini. Raspberry Pi has a de facto monopoly in the cheap board space as they were targeting educational use purposes. And almost no company had a need (or incentive) to compete in that space. Markets are currently rerating an education company that used to sell 1-2 boards for testing. Into an AI hardware company that sells mass producible boards for AI Agent Orchestration.
-
RPI因AI新用例成垄断者，正通过涨价转嫁内存成本。
是的，他们在廉价硬件板领域曾是事实上的垄断者，因为主要用途是教育。没人真的想或需要去竞争。随后，AI 智能体编排(AI agent orchestration)的新用例一夜之间出现，使 $RPI 成为领导者。他们一直在对 RPI 5 等板卡进行涨价，以避免内存成本侵蚀利润。我相当确定他们也有库存，但不太确定这会如何演变。
原推 ↗英文原文
Yeah, they were a defacto monopoly for cheap hardware boards because it was mainly for education purposes. Nobody really wanted or needed to compete. Then a new use case for AI agent orchestration came up overnight and made $RPI the leader. They've been price hiking boards like RPI 5 so they don't eat up memory costs. Pretty sure they have stockpiles too, but not quite sure how that plays out.
-
$RPI 因教育硬件垄断意外成为 AI 智能体编排硬件领导者。
是的，$RPI 意外地在一夜之间成为 AI 智能体编排硬件的领导者，这简直太搞笑了。 他们几乎垄断了廉价硬件市场，因为他们的初衷是为了教育目的。（没人愿意或需要与之竞争）。 结果发现，这在 AI 智能体集群中还有另一个应用场景。
原推 ↗英文原文
Yeah it's hilarious how $RPI accidentally became the leader in hardware for orchestration of AI agents overnight. They were almost a monopoly for cheap hardware because they wanted to do it for education purposes. (nobody else wanted or needed to compete). Turns out that has another use case in AI agent swarms.
-
RPI估值便宜，已成AI代理硬件龙头。
@CoffeeStocksGuy 不，是10.2亿美元。但考虑到$RPI已一夜之间成为AI代理编排硬件的领导者，并成为“代理蜂群”的默认代理标的，我认为这非常便宜。
原推 ↗英文原文
@CoffeeStocksGuy Nope, it's $1.02B. But that's very cheap to me considering $RPI has become the leader for AI agent orchestration hardware overnight and defacto proxy play for the "Agentic Swarms".
-
分析$RPI在内存短缺下，即便产能受限，积压需求与涨价仍利好营收。
这是最大的问题，也是看空论点。鉴于上游内存短缺，他们能否扩大产能以满足需求，我尚无答案。我们得等下一次财报电话会议才能揭晓。无论如何，我的思考逻辑是：即使他们无法扩大产能，积压的需求也会增加营收。$RPI 本月早些时候也对设备进行了涨价（例如 Raspberry Pi 5），这应该会有所帮助。
原推 ↗英文原文
That's the biggest question and bear case. I don't have an answer if they can scale up capacity to meet demand given memory shortages upstream. We'll have to find out next earnings call. Regardless, my thought process is that even if they can't scale up capacity -> backlogged demand increases revenue anyway. $RPI did also price hike devices too eg. raspberry pi 5, earlier this month, so that should help.
-
RPI TAM转向AI智能体，树莓派需求激增，作者顺势看好。
谢谢！这是关于总可寻址市场(TAM)在一夜之间从教育领域转向AI智能体集群(AI agent swarms)的新信息，市场正在通过 $RPI 对此进行定价。此前大家都在讨论苹果Mac Mini的短缺问题，但搭载新OpenClaw模型的树莓派(Raspberry Pi)需求激增，其对营收的影响相比苹果而言非常重大。话虽如此，我不太确定市场将如何对此进行定价，但我愿意顺势而为。
原推 ↗英文原文
Thank you! This is new information about TAM flipping overnight from education to AI agent swarms that markets are pricing in with $RPI. Everyone was talking about Apple Mac Mini shortages, but the surge in demand for Raspberry Pis with new OpenClaw models is very material to revenue compared to Apple. That being said, not quite sure how markets will price this in but I'm along for the ride.
-
树莓派因AI智能体部署需求激增，类比英伟达转型逻辑，市值潜力巨大。
树莓派（$RPI）又上涨了29%。 如果你在思考估值问题： $NVDA 从面向游戏玩家的GPU转型为面向AI推理/训练的GPU，市值从10亿美元重估至4.4万亿美元。 $RPI 从面向教育的廉价硬件，转型为AI智能体（与Apple Mac Mini一起）的标准配置。 我并非说它会像英伟达一样，但确实存在平行之处。 现在大家都在大量购买树莓派用于AI智能体相关部署，例如OpenClaw或Picoclaw。未来可能会有许多变种出现，比如$META Manus。 总可寻址市场（TAM）从人们购买1-2台的教育市场，转变为“尽可能多买”以本地部署AI智能体的市场。 目前市值为10.2亿美元。前途无量。
原推 ↗英文原文
Raspberry Pi ( $RPI ) is now up another 29%. If you're wondering about valuation: $NVDA went from GPUs for gamers into GPUs for AI inference/training. And re-rated to a $4.4T MC from $1B. $RPI went from cheap hardware for education, into the standard for AI agents (alongside Apple Mac Mini). Not saying it's going to be the same as Nvidia, but there's certainly parallels. Now everyone is mass-buying Raspberry Pis for AI agent related deployments, such as OpenClaw or Picoclaw. In the future, there will likely be many variants to come, such as $META Manus. The TAM went from education where people bought 1 or 2 to "buy-as-much-as-you-can" for deploying AI agents locally. The marketcap is $1.02B now. Sky is the limit.
-
持有RPI，预期OpenClaw需求将如Mac mini短缺般显著提振营收。
@Cheva28789724 谢谢！持有 $RPI 才一天，让我们看看关于“为 OpenClaw 用例囤积树莓派(Raspberry Pi)”的投资逻辑(thesis)会被如何定价。我猜测，与 $AAPL 的 Mac mini 短缺相比，这应该会对营收产生实质性影响。
原推 ↗英文原文
@Cheva28789724 Appreciate it! It's only been one day with $RPI but we'll see how my thesis regarding Raspberry Pi hoarding for OpenClaw use cases gets priced in. My guess is that it should have a material impact on revenue compared to the mac mini shortage with $AAPL.
-
OpenClaw代理部署带动树莓派需求，$RPI有望因收入重估而反转。
市场似乎很喜爱 OpenClaw 树莓派囤货潮。 $RPI 昨日上涨 8.1% 后，今日再涨 19.34%。https://t.co/DRQTCjIlmQ （该推文引用了 @aleabitoreddit 的推文，引用内容仅供理解语境）: 有趣的交易思路：做多 $RPI (Raspberry Pi) 理由：🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + 囤货。 大家一直在公开囤积 Apple Mac Mini，并长期持有苹果。但 $APPL 已经是市值 3.7 万亿美元+的公司，产品大规模购买对其影响微乎其微。 然而，树莓派是一家市值 5.4268 亿美元的公司。收入影响显著。 感觉市场尚未定价，因为我在 X 上几乎没看到关于该股票代码的提及（尽管有很多产品提及）。而且最近才开始有人囤积树莓派，因为它们比 500 美元以上的苹果产品便宜得多。它们也有自己的迷你 $NVDA CUDA-light 实用生态系统，人们正在使用。 事实证明，这些极其便宜的 20 美元或 200 美元的设备非常适合大规模部署隔离实例。 原因是为了 OpenClaw 编排（以免搞乱你的设备）-> 通过 API 与中央 LLM 交互。 以前人们只是出于爱好/教育目的购买 1 或 2 台，所以收入增长缓慢。但现在硅谷初创公司和个体据称正在购买数十或数百台这些设备，以运行并行的 OpenClaw 代理群集，或在 Reddit 等其他地方进行代理营销。 而且，不，有很多应用无法通过启动 AWS VPS 完成，所以人们在本地进行（自动化/AI 机器人有服务条款限制，所以公司设置自己的服务器）。 话虽如此，主要下行风险是： - 部分由基金会拥有，即使需求极度旺盛，他们可能也不会像 $SNDK 或 $MU 那样大幅提价 - 受 LPDDR4 组件等内存价格上涨影响 所以这不是一个主要仓位。 然而，展望未来，由于人们购买数十或数百台这些设备来运行 AI 代理，收入应该会增加。 资产负债表看起来也很干净，下行风险低： - 收入约 2.8 亿 - 3 亿美元 - 毛利润约 7500 万美元+ - 毛利率约 25% - 净利润：约 1000 万 - 1500 万美元 - 净现金：2800 万美元 分析师目前预测收入增长接近 14-17%。但如果需求涌入持续，如果囤货继续，我们可能会看到收入数字从 14% 的增长增加到适度的 48-55%。 消费者板块约占收入的 1/3，但 Openclaw + 变体的新购买无论如何都是重新评级的新催化剂。 特别是现在 Picoclaw 和压缩版 OpenClaw 变体能够在 20 美元的树莓派上运行，而不仅仅是树莓派 5。 但似乎人们忘记了树莓派也是一只公开交易的股票。股价 1 年下跌 56%，市值 5.4268 亿欧元跌至历史新低。所以这可能是反转的顺风。 此外，OpenClaw 成为基于树莓派的代理部署的长期催化剂的可能性也不为零。 TLDR：人们公开购买树莓派和苹果 Mac Mini 用于 Openclaw/Picoclaw，因此收入应从需求增加中受益。
原推 ↗英文原文
Markets seem to love the OpenClaw Raspberry Pi hoarding. $RPI up another 19.34%, from yesterday's 8.1%. https://t.co/DRQTCjIlmQ
-
吐槽 $RPI 交易费用高昂，但看好其作为代理部署标准的长期潜力。
遗憾的是，费用似乎相当昂贵。我刚刚在伦敦证券交易所(LSE)购买了 $RPI，结果花费了几百欧元。如果 openclaw 的需求不是周期性的（并最终成为部署代理的事实标准），这是一笔有趣且具备上行潜力的交易。但市场上还有其他多头机会。
原推 ↗英文原文
Fees seem pretty expensive sadly. I just bought $RPI on LSE and it ended up costing a few hundred euros. It's a fun trade with potential upside if the openclaw demand is not a cycle (and ends up being used as the defacto way to deploy agents). But there's other long opportunities out in the sea.
-
RPI估值偏高且面临内存瓶颈，预计将通过涨价弥补成本。
几点看法： - 作为新上市IPO，去年的估值原本就存在高估。 - 上游存在旧款LPDDR4 DRAM的内存瓶颈。 我认为$RPI在其机型上的涨价幅度不足以抵消组件成本的上升（本月2日左右进行了大幅涨价）。话虽如此，鉴于需求的涌入，我预计他们能够通过进一步涨价来弥补内存成本的上涨。
原推 ↗英文原文
Few things: - new IPO so originally inflated valuations last year. - upstream memory bottleneck with older LPDDR4 DRAM. Don't think $RPI hiked prices enough on their models (did a massive hike ~Feb 2nd this month) to balance out component cost. That being said, given influx of demand, I'd expect them to be able to do so to make up for memory hikes.
-
博主因树莓派硬件联想建立$RPI多头头寸。
我原本在想，自己尝试用压缩版的 Openclaw 加上树莓派 Zero (Raspberry Pi Zero) 来运行代理蜂群 (agentic swarm) 应用。然后我意识到 $RPI 是一只股票，这就是我建立多头头寸 (long idea) 的灵感来源。这是一个将 Openclaw 变体联系起来的有趣想法，目前还没有人分享过。希望这个判断是对的！
原推 ↗英文原文
I was thinking about trying agentic swarm applications myself actually with compressed openclaw versions + raspberry pi zeros. Then I realized $RPI was a stock, hence where I got the long idea. It’s a fun idea that nobody shared yet tying it to Openclaw variants. Hope it’s right!
-
树莓派因AI应用被抢购，但大众不知其股票代码
@DoctorMeltzer 是的，现在 X、Tiktok、Youtube 上大家都在讨论在树莓派(Raspberry Pi)上运行 OpenClaw。而且据硅谷的传闻，现在商业应用也在用 lol。人们似乎正在购买/囤积该产品，但我聊过的人都不知道 $RPI 是一只股票。 https://t.co/FVd7ltj1dU
原推 ↗英文原文
@DoctorMeltzer Yeah, everyone is talking about OpenClaw on Raspberry Pis on X, Tiktok, Youtube. And anecdotally in Silicon Valley now for business applications lol. People seem to be buying/hoarding the product, but nobody I've talked to knew $RPI was a stock. https://t.co/FVd7ltj1dU
-
看好$RPI，因AI智能体部署引发硬件囤货潮，营收有望超预期增长。
有趣的交易思路：做多 $RPI (树莓派) 理由：🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + 囤货潮。 大家都在公开囤积 Apple Mac Mini，并长期持有苹果股票。 但 $APPL 已经是市值 3.7 万亿美元以上的巨头。产品的大规模抢购对其影响微乎其微。 然而，$RPI 是一家市值仅 5.4268 亿美元的公司。 营收影响是实质性的。 感觉市场尚未对此定价，因为我在 X 上几乎没看到关于该股票代码的提及（尽管产品提及很多）。 而且最近才开始出现树莓派的囤货潮，因为它们比 500 美元以上的苹果产品便宜得多。它们还拥有人们使用的迷你 $NVDA CUDA 轻量级实用生态系统。 事实证明，这些极其便宜的 20 美元或 200 美元的设备非常适合大规模部署隔离实例。 原因是为了 OpenClaw 编排（以免搞乱你的设备）-> 通过 API 与中央 LLM 接口。 以前人们只是为了爱好/教育目的购买 1 或 2 台，所以营收增长缓慢。 但现在硅谷初创公司和个体据称正在购买数十或数百台这些设备，以运行并行的 OpenClaw 智能体集群，或在 Reddit 等其他地方进行智能体营销。 而且，不，有很多应用无法通过启动 AWS VPS 来完成，所以人们选择本地运行（自动化/AI 机器人存在服务条款限制，因此公司搭建自己的服务器）。 话虽如此，主要下行风险是： - 部分由基金会拥有，即使需求极度旺盛，他们可能也不会像 $SNDK 或 $MU 那样大幅提价 - 受 LPDDR4 组件等内存价格上涨的影响 所以这不是一个重仓头寸。 然而，展望未来，由于人们购买数十或数百台这些设备来运行 AI 智能体，营收应该会增加。 资产负债表看起来也很干净，下行风险低： - 营收约 2.8 亿 - 3 亿美元 - 毛利润约 7500 万美元+ - 毛利率约 25% - 净利润：约 1000 万 - 1500 万美元 - 净现金：2800 万美元 分析师目前预测营收增长接近 14-17%。 但如果需求涌入持续，如果囤货潮继续，我们可能会看到营收数字从 14% 的增长增加到适度的 48-55%。 消费板块约占营收的 1/3，但 Openclaw 及其变体带来的新购买潮仍然是重新评级的新催化剂。 特别是现在 Picoclaw 和压缩版 OpenClaw 变体已经能够在 20 美元的树莓派上运行，而不仅仅是树莓派 5。 但似乎人们忘记了树莓派也是一只公开交易的股票。 股价一年下跌 56%，市值 5.4268 亿欧元跌至历史新低。 这可能是反转的顺风。 OpenClaw 成为基于树莓派的智能体部署的长期催化剂的可能性也不为零。 TLDR：人们正在公开购买树莓派和 Apple Mac Mini 用于 Openclaw/Picoclaw，因此营收应从需求增加中受益。
原推 ↗英文原文
Fun Trade Idea: Long $RPI (Raspberry Pi) Reason: 🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + Hoarding. Everyone has been openly hoarding Apple Mac Minis and were long Apple. But $APPL is already a $3.7T+ company. Product mass-buying won't make a dent. Raspberry Pi, however, is a 542.68M company. The revenue is material. Feels like markets haven't priced this in since I've seen almost 0 mentions about the ticker on X (but many product mentions). And it's only recently that have the hoarding started Raspberry Pis, as they're much cheaper than $500+ Apple products. They also have their mini $NVDA CUDA-light utility ecosystem that people use. So it turns out these extremely cheap $20 or $200 devices are perfect for deploying mass deploying isolated instances. The reason is for OpenClaw orchestration (so they don’t mess up your device) -> interfacing with a central LLM via API. Before people were just buying 1 or 2 for hobby/education purposes, so revenue has slowing. But now Silicon Valley startups and individuals anecdotally appear to be buying tens or hundreds of these things to run concurrent OpenClaw agentic swarms or do stuff like agentic marketing on Reddit and other places. And no, there are many applications that can't be done by spinning up AWS VPS, so people do it locally (there's TOS around automation/AI bots, so companies setup their own servers). That being said main downside risk is that its - partially foundation owned, and they might not hike rates like $SNDK or $MU does, even if there's extreme demand - Subject to memory price hikes like LPDDR4 component so this is not a major position. However, going forward, revenue should increase due to people buying tens or hundreds of these things for running AI agents. Balance sheet also looks clean with low downside risk: - ~$280M - $300M revenue - ~$75M+ Gross Profit - ~25% Gross Margin - Net income: ~$10M - $15M - Net Cash: $28M Analysts currently project revenue growth closer to 14–17%. But if the demand influx continues, we might see revenue numbers might hit increase from 14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues. Consumer segments are roughly 1/3rd of revenue but the newfound buying from Openclaw + variants is a new cataylst nevertheless for re-rating. Especially now that Picoclaw and compressed OpenClaw variants are now able to be run on $20 Raspberry Pis instead of just the Raspberry Pi 5’s. But seems like people just forgot Raspberry PI was a publicly stock as well. The stock price is down 56% 1Y to 542.68M euro MC to an all time low. So this might be that tailwind for a reversal. There's also a non-zero chance OpenClaw is a long term catalyst for Raspberry Pi based, agentic deployments. TLDR: People are openly buying Raspberry Pis and Apple Mac Minis for Openclaw/Picoclaw, so revenue should benefit from increased demand.
-
对比苹果与树莓派，认为后者营收受硬件囤积影响更大。
我聊过的所有人都知道 $RPI，但没人知道树莓派(Raspberry Pi)是一家上市公司，这很有趣（虽然是新IPO）。人们因为囤积Mac mini而做多 $APPL，考虑到其体量，这毫无道理。但人们也在囤积树莓派公司（市值5.5亿）。所以我猜测其营收影响应该更显著。
原推 ↗英文原文
Everyone I've talked to knows $RPI but nobody knew Raspberry Pi was a public company, which was interesting (new IPO though). People were long $APPL because of mac mini hoarding, which made no sense given it's size. But people are also hoarding Raspberry PIs (550m MC) company. So revenue should be more material was my guess.