· 供应链分析

详细映射 P4O 可能成为 LITE 上游玻璃供应商,但强调未必能显著转化为收入。

涉及标的:

中文翻译

我刚看了评论…… $P4O 看起来像是一个潜在的 $LITE 上游供应商,市值只有 3400 万美元。 它大致的映射可能是: -> Plan Optik $P4O(玻璃晶圆) -> Teledyne $TDY 或 Silek(存储晶圆厂) -> $LITE(OCS 交换机) -> $GOOGL(TPU) 不过,$LITE 这个层面上的玻璃晶圆供应,可能也会和 Corning($GLW)双源采购。 P4O 是 Infineon、Samsung 等公司的已知供应商,所以也不是随便的一家公司。 €335 万现金 vs. 3552 万美元市值,资产负债表还挺健康。 但这不代表它一定会带来显著收入提升,除非他们开始提价(因为玻璃晶圆大概只占 $LITE OCS BOM 的很小一部分)。 我个人在读完这些之后是持有了一些股份。 因为 $LITE OCS 潜在供应链瓶颈在战略上很有价值,也许财务上没那么明显。 但它关于 Plan Optik 的玻璃流和 MDF finishing 在 OCS 封装里几乎不可替代这一点,我觉得是成立的。 当然,超大规模云供应链保护得很严,所以也不可能 100% 确定。 这些功劳都属于跟帖的粉丝们。 但 TLDR: 供应链映射 -> $P4O -> 晶圆厂 -> $LITE -> $GOOGL,按他们的分析是很可能的。 至于它是不是 $LITE OCS 供应链里的瓶颈……我不确定它到底能不能显著转化成财务价值。 再说一遍,我完全不是在推荐它。 只是觉得这种 $LITE OCS 供应链映射很有意思,把粉丝辛辛苦苦做的研究丢到空白里也太浪费了。

英文原文

So just checked out the comments... $P4O does look like a potential upstream $LITE supplier at a $34M MC. How it likely maps: -> Plan Optik $P4O (Glass Wafers) -> Teledyne $TDY or Silek (Mem Foundries) -> $LITE (OCS Switches) -> $GOOGL (TPUs) However, $LITE likely dual sources with Corning ( $GLW ) on the glass wafer level. P4O is a known supplier to Infineon, Samsung, and others, so not exactly a random company. €3.35 million vs. 35.52M MC is very healthy balance sheet. That being said: -> That doesn't exactly mean this translates to material revenue boosts unless they start price hike (given glass wafers are likely a very small part of $LITE OCS BOM). I do personally own shares, after reading this. Since $LITE OCS potential supply chain chokepoints is strategically valuable. Maybe not so much so as financially valuable. But their core thesis that Plan Optik's Glass Flow and MDF finishing are effectively irreplaceable for OCS packaging checks out. Of course, hyperscaler supply chains are heavily guarded, so no way to know 100%. All credit goes to follower comments. But TLDR: Supply Chain Mapping -> $P4O -> Foundries -> $LITE -> $GOOGL is very likely from their analysis. As for being a chokepoint in $LITE OCS supply chain... dunno if it translates materially. Again, not recommending this at all. Just thought the $LITE OCS supply chain mapping like this very interesting, and that it would be a waste of the follower kinda posted all this work into the void.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗