$AIRO

提及 36 首次 2026-01-02 最近 2026-03-26

相关推文

按时间倒序

  1. 概述自己的打法:先识别新兴赛道,再沿整条供应链做多,同时强调风控和透明。

    如果你现在还不了解我的风格: 我会先识别即将起来的赛道(光子学、存储、无人机),然后沿着整条供应链去做多。 当然,我也不是每次都对。 $AVAV 和无人机板块是我今年除 $RDDT 外亏得最多的(不过 $OSS 最后涨了 60%+)。 我仍然从基本面上相信像 $AIRO、$LPTH 等公司长期都非常扎实。($AIRO 现在仍然涨了大约 15%,但它曾经 70%+ 的涨幅大部分都没了,Draganfly 跌得更多。) 而且光看 $SNDK 这种超级周期,就会产生一种非常不现实的预期,觉得每个月都能涨 100%。 我在那个板块里识别的主要催化,是委内瑞拉入侵带来的隐蔽无人机 + 前沿防御合同 / 分包商需求。 我也预期后续会有资金继续流入这个板块。 不过,在格陵兰协议那一段,我提过自己已经开始降风险了(大多数防务承包商都跌了),但我还是保留了像 $AVAV 这种较小仓位。 SCAR 项目输给其他公司,比如 $AVAV,这也是个更大的意外,我亏得更多。 不幸的是,伊朗战争这次主要冲击的是像 L3 Harris、$NOC 这种更大的防务承包商,以及像 Anduril 这样的私营公司,还有一些定向能供应商,比如 $LASR。 所以无人机公司并没有多少顺风修复。 尽管如此,我确实知道怎么止损。 但我还是经常被人喷,说“看你今年早些时候喜欢过的 X 股票”。 在这件事上我很透明:$IREN 社区里某些高管,在他们的粉丝因为 $BKKT 或 $ASST 稀释后亏掉 90% 之后,会把所有帖子都删掉。 我挑的多数股票基本面都非常扎实,所以从最初 thesis 出来以后,它们要么守住了自己的价位。 而且我也会把风险等级 / 信念等级一起写出来(风险高的当然下行也更大)。 我比那些只会发热评的人更有 skin in the game。 所以如果我的 thesis 错了,我自己也会亏钱(这种例子还有很多,像 $AVAV 这种就是无穷无尽的亏损)。 但我会把所有东西都留着,让你们自己看事情最后怎么演变。

    英文原文

    If you don't know my style by now: I identify upcoming sectors (photonics, memory, drones), then go long on the entire supply chain. I'm not always right, though. $AVAV and the drone sectors were my biggest losses this year outside of $RDDT ( $OSS did end up 60%+ ). I still believe fundamentally companies like $AIRO, $LPTH and others are extremely solid long term. ( $AIRO is still up ~15%, but lost majority of it's 70%+ gains, Draganfly dropped way more) And there's very unrealistic expectations from looking at $SNDK supercycles that everything can go up 100% a month. The main catalyst I've identified around that sector was the Venezuela invasion's usage of hidden drone + edge defense contracts/subcontractors. And I expected there to be follow-up funding into the sector. However, I mentioned I de-risked around the Greenland deal (majority of defense contractors crashed) but kept smaller concentration in stuff like $AVAV. SCAR program loss to others like $AVAV was even a bigger surprise and I lost even more. Unfortunately, the War in Iran focused around larger defense contractors like L3 Harris, $NOC and private companies like Anduril, and some energy directed suppliers like $LASR. So there weren't many tailwind recoveries for drone companies. That being said, I do know how to cut losses. But I still get a lot of crap saying oh look at "X stock they've liked earlier in the year". I'm very transparent when it comes to these things: A certain executive in the $IREN community are known to delete all their posts after their followers lose 90% on $BKKT or $ASST post-dilution. Majority of my stocks I identify are extremely solid fundamentally so they either hold their level since my original thesis. And I post risk-levels / conviction-levels with them too (risky ones obviously have more downside). I have skin in the game compared to others that just post hot takes. So if my thesis is wrong, I lose money personally (there's ton of more fills like this, just endless losses on $AVAV). But I leave everything up so you can see how things play out.

  2. 博主复盘YTD 316%收益,分享交易策略、核心持仓优势及免费分享初衷。

    年初至今:316.4% 从2026年1月到2026年2月。 对我短期交易和多头持仓的回顾: > 年初对像 $GLXY、$SMCI 和 $IREN 这样进行税务收割(tax harvested)的股票进行波段交易(swing traded) > 搭乘委内瑞拉股票从 Gold Reserve、$AVAV 到 $CVX(看涨期权)上涨的顺风车 > 在战争入侵后买入像 $LPTH、$OSS、$AIRO 这样的国防股,以及受“跟随领导者”催化剂驱动的 $ONDS > 对 $INTC 进行催化剂交易,并正确把握了财报时机。 > 因对线色变化(wire color change)的担忧而对 $CRDO 进行波段交易 > 在超大规模客户损失(hyperscaler client losses)被错误报道后对 $MRVL 进行波段交易 > 像 $META 一样正确预判了财报 > 在 $NBIS 和 $CIFR 大幅抛售至 $70 和 $11 时,通过保证金(margin)加仓 > 从 $HOOD 下跌到 $CRDO 下跌再到复苏的过程中进行波段交易。 > 在比特币跌至 $73k 时买入,并在 $62k 时大量使用保证金博取复苏 > 像 $ETOR 这样的复苏股在抛售和财报后表现良好。 > 正确把握了像 $RPI 这样的公司的催化剂 > 利用亚洲股票与欧洲/美国时区之间的时间滞后套利(time lag arbitrages) > 利用 $EWY 和其他指数的隐含波动率扩张(IV expansion) > 把握轮动进入电力/电网股如 $XLU 的时机,目前正对像 $RDDT 这样的股票进行波段交易, 我肯定漏掉了一些,但这些是我主要发布的内容! 此外,我会进行日内交易(day trade): 例如 $ORCL 因发行导致8%抛售后的复苏,或 $SOFI 因无关紧要的卖方降级导致随机10%抛售。 我不在主时间线发布这些内容,因为我不想影响人们的买卖决策。 只想提供方向性思路,让人们得出自己的结论。 除此之外,我很高兴今天一切都上涨了,包括我的对冲(hedges)头寸。 与此同时,我的核心多头组合来自: - 从 SK Hynix 到 $AXTI 的光子学(Photonics)和存储,以及像 $AEHR 和 $FORM 这样的供应链瓶颈,其表现远超 Burry 的 $PLTR 每年 $415 的回报。 - 来自韩国/日本股票如 Nittobo、Kioxia 和 Unimicron 的多头持仓,有力支撑了美股回撤。 并非我组合中的所有股票都是绿色的,如 $CRCL、$CPSH、$VLN、$NBIS 或最近的 $INFQ。 但重要的是绿色持仓的集中度高于红色。与此同时,SPY 年初至今仅为 .55%,大多数高贝塔(high beta)股票年初至今大幅下跌。 我也不希望大家跟随我所有的操作,因为板块轮动、期权套利和基板瓶颈(substrate bottlenecks)很难消化。由于我也根据宏观/财报催化剂在约30只股票之间轮动,而大多数人只关注几只并持有数年。 但是,当2025年第四季度的短期回撤(如果人们买了短期期权)出错时,确实让人难受,直到现在才恢复超过平均成本。 然而,我对核心多头如 $NBIS 最终将大幅跑赢市场非常有信心。 希望大家能从中获得一两个有趣的交易思路或学到一些东西! —— 只是有些反思,我认为我最近受欢迎的一个原因是我没有试图推销任何东西。这也不是我的全职工作(我经营一家科技公司),我只是出于乐趣做这件事,所以对最近的受欢迎程度感到非常惊讶。 我认为我的优势可能是信息综合与映射 -> 发现市场遗漏的阿尔法(alpha) -> 转化为金融科技和半导体领域的可执行多头思路。 与发布突发新闻或擅长拆解一两只特定股票的账户相比。 无论如何,我免费发布所有想法只是为了在能帮助他人时获得满足感。 所以,人们觉得我的想法有趣或信号足够强而愿意倾听,这让我心存感激。

    英文原文

    Year to Date: 316.4% From January 2026 into February 2026. Reflection of my short term trades and longs: > Swing traded tax harvested stocks like $GLXY, $SMCI, and $IREN start of the year > Rode Venezuela stocks from Gold Reserve, $AVAV, to $CVX (calls) up > Bought into defense like $LPTH, $OSS, $AIRO after invasion from war + $ONDS “follow the leader” catalyst > Catalyst traded $INTC and timed earnings correctly. > Swing traded $CRDO off wire color change fears > Swing traded $MRVL after erroneous reporting on hyperscaler client losses > Got earnings right like $META > Portfolio margined into $NBIS and $CIFR on the major selloff to $70 and $11. > Swing trades things from $HOOD drop to $CRDO drop into recovery. > Bought Bitcoin dip to $73k and heavy margin on $62k into recovery > Recovery plays like $ETOR after selloff and ER helped. > Getting catalysts on companies like $RPI correct > Time lag arbitrages between Asian equities and European/US time zones. > IV expansion off $EWY and other indexes. > Timing rotation into power/grids like $XLU and currently swing trading stuff like $RDDT, I’m sure I missed a bunch but these were the main ones I posted about! On the side I would day trade: Eg. $ORCL 8% selloff from offering into recovery or random 10% selloffs on immaterial $SOFI sellside downgrades. I don’t post stuff like these on my main timeline since I don’t want to influence when people buy/sell. Just want to give directional ideas and let people come to their own conclusions. Aside from that I’m happy everything went up today, including my hedges. This is all while my core long portfolio from: - Photonics and memory from SK Hynix to $AXTI to supply chain bottlenecks like $AEHR and $FORM have been mogging Burry’s $PLTR $415/year returns. - Longs from Korean/Japanese equities like Nittobo, Kioxia, and Unimicron have hard carried US equity drawdowns. Not everything in my portfolio is green like $CRCL, $CPSH, $VLN, $NBIS or recently $INFQ. But what matters is you have more concentration in green than red. This is all while SPY is YTD: .55% and most high beta stocks are heavily red YTD. I also don’t want people to follow along everything since sector rotation, option arbitrage, and substrate bottlenecks are hard to digest. Since I also rotate around like 30 different stocks based on macro/earning catalysts, whereas most people focus on a few and hold on for years. But it does hurt when more if get something wrong with short term drawdowns from Q4 2025 (if people bought short term options) and it’s only now recovered past cost average. However, I’m extremely confident in core longs like $NBIS to strongly outperform in due time. Hopefully people can take away one or two trade ideas that they find interesting or learn something! —— Just some reflection, i think a reason for my recent popularity is I’m not trying to sell anything. This is also not my full time job (I run a tech company) and I was just doing this for enjoyment, so very surprised by the recent popularity. I do think my edge is probably information synthesis and mapping -> discovering alpha markets missed -> into actionable long ideas across fintech and semis. Compared to accounts that publish breaking news or excel in breakdowns of one or two specific stocks. Regardless, I publish all my ideas for free just to get fulfillment if I can help others. So it does bring me gratitude that people find my ideas interesting or high-signal enough to listen.

  3. 列举国防股标的,认为RKLB短期高估但长期首选。

    $OSS、$AIRO、$DPRO、$LPTH(勉强算)是国防股。忘了在上面加上 $AVAV,但我会把它加在 $259 的位置。 由于与格陵兰达成和平协议,近期没有真正的军事催化剂。但随着新的伊朗紧张局势,它们可能会再次受到关注。 话虽如此,我觉得 $RKLB 目前有点被高估,但长期来看它是我首选的标的。

    英文原文

    $OSS, $AIRO, $DPRO, $LPTH (sorta) are defense stocks. Forgot to include $AVAV up there but I’d add that in at $259. There was peace with Greenland so no really military catalysts recently. But they might pick up again with new Iran tensions. That being said just feel like $RKLB is a tad overvalued right now but long term it’s my favorite pick

  4. 展示含杠杆的AI与加密多头组合,强调风险管理避免全仓小盘股。

    组合权重是我被问得最多的问题。 以下是我的投资组合构成: 35% 存储超级周期 _ 10% 三星电子 10% 海力士 10% $MU 5% $SNDK 25% 数字资产敞口 _ 10% $IBIT 5% $COIN 5% $HOOD 2.5% $CRCL 2.5% $SOL 15% 金融科技/广告 5% $RDDT 5% $ETOR 5% $TTD 15% 数据中心 - 10% $NBIS 5% $CRDO 10% 半导体 _ 5% $INTC 5% $TSM 10% 光子学 5% $LITE 2.5% $AXTI 2.5% $COHR 5% 对冲/现金 5% 对冲(例如 $VIX 或 $QQQ 看跌期权,尤其是现在) 10% 小盘股“登月”标的 2.5% $VPG 2.5% $LPTH 1.5% $VLN 1.5% $AIRO 1% $OSS .5% $DPRO .5% $CPSH 这使用了轻微杠杆,例如 1.25 倍。 额外杠杆(最高 1.5 倍): - 波段交易(例如 $GLXY) 我的投资组合看起来与此大致相似,但包含更多随机名称如 $AEHR 或 欣兴电子,且权重不同。 这是做多半导体 + AI 超级周期,并在加密货币中进行复苏交易。如果(谷歌、Meta、微软)削减支出,这将造成打击,但他们刚刚增加了资本支出。 但这只是展示我如何进行风险管理,全仓押注像 $POET 这样的小盘股是非常危险的。

    英文原文

    Portfolio weightings is my most common question. Here’s what my portfolio looks like: 35% Memory Supercycle _ 10% Samsung Electronics 10% Sk Hynix 10% $MU 5% $SNDK 25% Digital Asset exposure _ 10% $IBIT 5% $COIN 5% $HOOD 2.5% $CRCL 2.5% $SOL 15% Fintech/Advertising 5% $RDDT 5% $ETOR 5% $TTD 15% Datacenter - 10% $NBIS 5% $CRDO 10% Semi _ 5% $INTC 5% $TSM 10% Photonics 5% $LITE 2.5% $AXTI 2.5% $COHR 5% Hedge/Cash 5% Hedge (Eg. $VIX or $QQQ Puts, especially around now) 10% Small Cap Moonshots 2.5% $VPG 2.5% $LPTH 1.5% $VLN 1.5% $AIRO 1% $OSS .5% $DPRO .5% $CPSH This is using slight margin, eg 1.25x. Additional Margin (up to 1.5x): - Swing Trades (eg. $GLXY) My portfolio looks vaguely similar to this, but with more random names like $AEHR or Unimicron and different weightings. This is long semi + AI supercycle, with a recovery trade in Crypto. If (Google, Meta, MSFT) cut spending this would hurt, but they just increased capex spend. But this is just showing how I do risk management, it’s very risky to full send it into micro caps like $POET.

  5. 复盘上月提及的AIRO、LPTH和AVAV表现,重申其投资逻辑。

    大家都在走上路。所以 $VPG 是那个强力核心。说正经的,$AIRO、$LPTH 和 $AVAV 都是上个月提到的。$AIRO 自提及以来上涨了 24.9%。我进行了加仓摊平成本,所以在回调后略微盈利/持平。这是我对 $ONDS 的补涨操作,投资逻辑没有改变。$LPTH 下跌了几个百分点,作为锗(Germanium)瓶颈环节的修复方案。基本面没有发生严重的恶化。这是美国锗供应链从向中国转向黑钻(Black Diamond)的长期战略。短期2-3周的价格波动不重要。$AVAV 上涨了,但我是在320多美元时讨论的它。$RKLB 是一家市值450亿美元以上的发射公司,而 $AVAV 凭借数十亿美元的国防合同,年增长率达到三位数。所以在130-140亿美元市值时,我认为这是一个很好的长线标的。

    英文原文

    They’re all running it down Toplane. Hence why $VPG is the hard carry. Jokes aside $AIRO, $LPTH and $AVAV were all mentioned last month. $AIRO was up 24.9% since I mentioned it. Cost averaged up, so slightly green/breakeven after the drop. This was my catchup play to $ONDS and nothing about the thesis changed. $LPTH is down a few percent as a Germanium choke point fix. Nothing too dire materially changed. This was a long term US germanium supply chain pivot away from China into black diamond. Short term prices in 2-3 weeks don’t matter much. $AVAV is up, but I did talk about it in the $320s. $RKLB is a $45B+ launch company and AVAV is scaling triple digits Y/Y off billions in defense contracts. So at $13-14B I think this is a good long

  6. 发布1月25日美股评级,强烈看好AI、内存及美国供应链瓶颈股,回避高估值与稀释风险标的。

    1月25日评级。欧盟关税及$INTC财报后更新。 强烈买入: $SNAP $META 三星电子 SK海力士 $MU 欣兴电子 $TSM $CRCL $AXTI $LPTH $COPX $LIT $AEHR $FORM $AMKR $AVGO $MRVL 买入: $COIN $SMCI $GOOGL $FIG $AMZN $IBIT $RDDT $TTD $HIMS $HOOD $COHR $AMBA $IREN $POET $AAOI $LASR $VPG $OSS $INTC $UMAC $ONDS $AIRO $DPRO $AVAV $BULL $ETOR VLN NBIS GLXY CIFR HUT WULF 存疑 $VELO $SKYT 回避 $UAVS $BKKT WLMT SLNH $PLTR CRWV $ORCL $BMNR $IONQ, RGTI, QBTS _ 强烈买入 Snapchat - 底部约在$7.4,我认为在此位置非常强劲。随着内存资本支出减少及内存变现进入2027年,自由现金流(FCF)增加。只需等待重估。 Meta - 营收同比增长26%极其强劲,上季度产生超$100亿自由现金流。预计下季度财报后走势将走强,此前因光学(环比EPS光学效应超700%)导致BBB抛售,现在应已消化。 三星电子 - 半导体领域的圣杯,三星同时提供高带宽内存(HBM)和代工(Fab)敞口。 SK海力士 - 内存超级周期 美光 - 内存超级周期,但有美国背景支持。 欣兴电子 - 针对HBM、IC载板、玻璃基板、CoWoS及其他所有瓶颈环节的“邪恶”长线持仓。 台积电 - 印钞机,字面意义上不会出错。 Circle - 预计降息2-3次可能会大幅损害Circle净利润,因此已被定价。但在$160亿市值时是极佳的长线标的,他们正在印钞,且应开始看到美元稳定币(USDC)的扩张。 AXTI - LPTH: 磷化铟(InP)/锗等瓶颈。将成为2026年的巨大主题。只需等待AXT的供应链中断或Lightpath的黑钻(Black Diamond)在美国制造。我认为由于产能爬坡->收入增加,下行风险极低,但类似HBM的“登月式”涨价可能存疑。 COPX - 锂:稀土/材料如铜、锂是2026年的极佳长线标的。与上述瓶颈类似,来自中国的供应链中断将导致资金流向确保供应+建设新供应链。 AEHR - 说实话,他们处于AI和机器人两个热门垂直领域。$550万索诺玛(Sonoma)订单可能与美光和碳化硅(SiC)测试有关。看起来是市值低于$10亿的极佳“登月”标的。 FORM - 由于涉及DRAM/HBM及代工/逻辑,可能在美国供应链中变得重要。良率在HBM4中尤为重要。 AMKR - 美国本土制造供应链及台积电->美国转移的极大受益者。 博通 - 财报后近期大幅回调。鉴于超大规模客户ASIC将继续爬坡(尽管有一些延迟),我认为在此位置强烈买入。 Marvell - 与博通故事相同,Marvell因微软Maia延迟传闻而抛售。只需等待2027年营收约翻倍,当市场开始定价这一点,以及在Celestial收购后,他们在互连等其他领域做得很好。 买入 Coinbase - 加密货币近期回调使Coinbase在$570亿市值下价值再次合理。我从未喜欢其交易所部分,但为贝莱德IBIT ETF提供基础设施+与Circle的USDC收入分成,赋予Coinbase相当不错的长期价值。 SMCI - 从$60+暴跌回$30+呈现了极具吸引力的机会。市场极度担忧毛利率->SMCI向海外扩张,特别是主权AI+购买低端Nvidia GPU。且SMCI在那里的毛利率应会提升。也可能因为与客户达成的交易变得“粘性”。他们的营收增长并未停滞,仍达$360亿+。 GOOGL - 此时Gemini可能会接管ChatGPT,所以我会继续做多谷歌。 Figma - 软件板块抛售为许多被重挫的标的如Figma提供了良好机会,其拥有极高的毛利率+稳健增长。 亚马逊 - 价格基本与去年持平,他们一直在增长,AWS表现良好,涉足机器人+太空低轨卫星(LEO),看起来是未来极佳的长线标的。 比特币 - 始终是极具吸引力的长线标的 Reddit - 估值高,但毛利率极高且不会消失,因为每个人都在用Reddit。 TTD - 2025年的抛售再次呈现了极具吸引力的估值 HIMS - 说实话,在$29时对我极具吸引力,可能会再次放入强烈买入,但当然营收减速非常令人担忧。主要Alpha在于市场未定价Zava收购,仅凭庞大的客户群,他们就能从新客户中衍生大量营收。 Robinhood - 从$140抛售回$100再次为Robinhood提供了良好机会。他们不会消失,加上银行+其他新产品营收扩张,应带来积极顺风。 Coherent - 长线美国供应链,特别是光子学、InP等。 AMBA - 针对边缘AI推理用于机器人爬坡+边缘计算的“登月”长线标的。 POET - 现在基本是1/2现金,通过Celestial间接进入Marvell+超大规模客户。鉴于承销商在$7.25买入,$6.8的股价具有吸引力。 AAOI - 与微软Maia和AWS Trainium绑定的长线标的。两者都尚未真正起飞,所以只是等待游戏。 LASR - 定向能武器非常酷。我不太喜欢基本面如20%左右的营收增长,但技术实在太酷了。 VPG - 与Optimus爬坡绑定的长线标的。我们应在2026年底看到工业用例,2027年底看到消费用例,所以Optimus生产可能现在开始或Q2影响资产负债表。 OSS - 国防板块及边缘AI+$2亿合同的长线标的。 INTC - 做多美国政策,财报并未改变任何观点,只是短期价格。 UMAC - 在此水平上是美国无人机制造的极佳长线标的。 ONDS, Airo, DPRO - 与AIRO, DPRO相同,看多无人机板块。相比几周前美国入侵委内瑞拉并威胁格陵兰时,没有太多巨大的顺风,但主题上看多。 AVAV - 关于将研发类合同->长期合同的错误信息导致抛售,呈现了相当大的上行空间 BULL - 我喜欢像Robinhood, Webull等拥有大量零售用户的券商,因为一旦拥有客户群,就有无尽的变现方式。抛售回$8呈现了极具吸引力的上行空间 ETOR - 抛售过度,净利润同比高,基本50%现金,下行风险低。只需等待财报重估。他们表现也不错,AUM同比70%+,所以不明白为何这样定价。 VLN - 不再像以前那样接近1:1资产/净值,曾有一段时间他们有$1100万+投资(下跌63%)毛利率,$9300万现金,所以会更接近1.1-1.2亿 : $1.4亿市值,这说不通。话虽如此,仍有$8000万远期营收,毛利率从63%->69%,看起来重估机会相当大。市场似乎只是不喜欢与某国相关的公司如Etoro,我想 Nebius - $150亿Clickhouse估值仅显示了分部加总(SOTP),我不惊讶他们的子公司如Avride最终会超越主营业务。话虽如此,由于$20亿+ ATM在公开市场出售,近期有卖压。随着他们在2026年底达到$70亿ARR目标,应会极速爬坡。 GLXY, CIFR, HUT, IREN, WULF - 继续做多colo及其他新云板块标的。话虽如此,大多数自2025年以来已上涨30-40%+,所以它们不再是强烈的买入,因为已被定价。但仍有很多上行空间。 存疑 VELO - 很多人问我对此的看法,因为FinX喜欢这只股票。他们有很酷的客户如SpaceX,但基本面看起来糟糕。 ~$1180万现金 + $1750万发行 vs. ~$2300万债务。他们几乎没有剩余跑道,现在买入的人可能会被稀释。 Velo是拥有像IQE(欧洲InP供应链)这样极佳客户群但基本面糟糕的完美例子。 SKYT - 它是美国本土制造供应链的极佳标的,用于量子组件或边缘等酷东西。受益于芯片法案,但营收增长非常缓慢。它比Velo是更好的投机性长线,因为基本面更好。 24%左右的低毛利率,非常低的运营利润率,显然已计入市值,但美国纯代工应是一个溢价的好故事。底线是增长不够快。 回避 UAVS - 无尽的稀释机器,超过100%的市值已给予可将对市值25%以下的股份100%+转换为零售出售的套利投资者 BKKT - $3亿ATM稀释,而市值为$5.5亿。无尽的稀释机器 沃尔玛 - 43倍市盈率,不可能。 SLNH - 前方有大量稀释。 Palantir - 担忧估值P/E Coreweave - 担忧巨额债务,$10亿+债务利息严重损害自由现金流。然后是OpenAI的分配/建设,如果考虑到Gemini正在接管OpenAI的市场份额,对其能否履行合同义务存在极度、极度的担忧。 Oracle - 可能有技术性反弹,但说真的,他们为OpenAI(如Stargate)花费了太多资本支出,像Coreweave一样,OpenAI在能否履行合同义务方面存在极度担忧 BMNR - 无尽的稀释机器为愚蠢的项目融资,如$2亿投入Mr. Beast的公司。预期长期ETH质押ETF,做空BMNR,溢价将消失,例如$2亿现金投入Mr. Beast的公司流动性很差。 IONQ, RGTI, QBTS - 量子估值非常拉伸。 _ 总体想法: 我个人保持极度做多,这只是个人想法,非投资建议(NFI)。 许多小盘股和投机性公司自1月1日以来已经重估,我不认为许多50-100%的涨幅会持续(周五我们看到这些标的中有很多获利了结)。 话虽如此,特朗普正试图进一步降息(再降息2-3次),特别是因为中期选举即将到来。 SPY上涨 = 当选几率更大。所以我会保持极度做多直到中期选举后。 话虽如此,这有助于成长、投机性公司等。但我们已经看到这在很大程度上已被定价,如我最喜欢的长线标的之一Rocketlab,季度营收$1.55亿却达到$450亿+市值,所以我开始质疑估值->将许多头寸转向更多价值型(如软件下跌或内存超级周期)。 主题上我极度看多 - AI, 内存, 半导体 - 瓶颈 - 关键材料等。 非常看多 - 美国本土制造供应链 看多 - 国防板块 并会寻找软件到社交媒体公司等的波段交易/复苏/重估机会,鉴于近期的抛售。

    英文原文

    Jan 25th Ratings. Post EU Tariffs and $INTC ER. Strong Buy: $SNAP $META Samsung Electronics SK Hynix $MU Unimicron $TSM $CRCL $AXTI $LPTH $COPX $LIT $AEHR $FORM $AMKR $AVGO $MRVL Buy: $COIN $SMCI $GOOGL $FIG $AMZN $IBIT $RDDT $TTD $HIMS $HOOD $COHR $AMBA $IREN $POET $AAOI $LASR $VPG $OSS $INTC $UMAC $ONDS $AIRO $DPRO $AVAV $BULL $ETOR VLN NBIS GLXY CIFR HUT WULF Questionable $VELO $SKYT Avoid $UAVS $BKKT WLMT SLNH $PLTR CRWV $ORCL $BMNR $IONQ , RGTI, QBTS _ Strong Buy Snapchat - Bottomed around $7.4, imo very strong at this level. Increased FCF from memory opex reduction and memory monetization into 2027. Just a waiting game for re-rating. Meta - 26% Y/Y revenue growth is extremely strong, produced $10B+ FCF last quarter. Expect it to pick up after next quarter earnings due to optics (700%+ Q/Q EPS optics) that caused selloff last time from BBB. Samsung Electronics - Holy grail for semis, samsung provides exposure to both hbm and foundry. SK Hynix - memory supercycle Micron - memory supercycle, but with US backing. Unimicron - unholy long for hbm, ic substrates, glass core, cowos, and all other bottlenecks. TSM - money printer, literally can't go wrong with this. Circle - 2-3x projected rate cuts would likely hurt circle net income a lot, hence why it's being priced in. But amazing long at $16B as they print money and should start seeing expansion of USDC. AXTI - LPTH: Bottlenecks for InP / Germanium, etc. Will be a huge theme going into 2026. It's just a waiting game for both supply chain disruption (in AXT) or made in America w/ black diamond in Lightpath. Low downside risk imo due to capacity ramp -> revenue increase, but moonshot HBM type price increases might be questionable. COPX - LI: Rare Earths/Materials like Copper, Lithium are great longs for 2026. Similar with bottlenecks above, supply chain disruptions from China will cause money to flow into securing supply + buildout out new supply chains. AEHR - Honestly, they sit in two different hot verticals in AI and Robotics. $5.5m Sonoma order might be linked with Micron and SiC Testing. Seems like an extremely good moonshot sub $1B MC. FORM - Likely to be important in US supply chains since they do DRAM/HBM, and Foundry/Logic. & Yield is especailyl important w/ hbm4. AMKR - extreme beneficiary of made in america us supply chains and tsm -> US AVGO - Large correction recently post earnings. Strong buy IMO at these levels given hyperscaler ASICs will continue to ramp (even though there's been some delays). MRVL - Same story with Broadcom, marvell selloff after rumors of Microsoft maia delays. It's just a waiting game for ~2x revenue in 2027 and when markets start pricing that in, and after celestial acqusition, they're doing great stuff in other segments like interconnects. Buy Coinbase - Recent correction to Crypto makes Coinbase value decent again at $57B. Was never a fan of their exchange portion, but providing infra for Blackrock IBIT etfs + USDC revenue sharing with Circle, gives Coinbase pretty good long term value. SMCI - Extreme selloff from the $60's+ back to $30's presents attractive opportunity here. Markets are extremely concerned about gross margins -> SMCI expanding overseas, especially with soverign AI + buying lower end nvda gpus. and SMCI's margins should increase over there. Also likely due to deals to become sticky w/ customers. It's not like they're dying revenue growth to $36B+. GOOGL - Gemini at this point would likely take over chatgpt, so i'd remain long google. Figma - Software selloff provides good opportunity into a lot of the hammered names like Figma which extremely high gross margins + sturdy growth Amazon - Basically same price as last year, they've been growing, AWS is doing fine, they're in robotics + space LEOs, and just seems like a great long going forward Bitcoin - Always an attractive Long Reddit - High valuations, but extremely high gross margins and not going anywhere since everyone uses reddit. TTD - Selloff from 2025 presents attractive valuations again HIMS - Honestly extremely attractive for me at $29, might be put into strong buy again, but of course revenue deceleration is very worrysome. Main alpha is that markets arent pricing in Zava acqusition and just from sheer customer base, they can derive a lot of revenue from new customers. Robinhood - Selloff from $140 back to $100 presents a good opportunity for Robinhood again. They're not going anywere, plus new product revenue expansion from banking + others, should present positive tailwinds. Coherent - Long US supply chains, esp. for photonics, inp, etc. AMBA - Moonshot long for edge AI inference for robotic ramps + edge compute. POET - Basically 1/2 cash now, backdoor into marvell + hyperscalers through celestial. Attractive upside at $6.8 given underwriters bought at $7.25 AAOI - long play tethered to msft maia and aws trainium. both of them haven't really taken off yet so it's just a waiting agme LASR - energy directed weapons are super cool. i dont quite like the fundamentals like low 20% revenue growth, but the technology is just way too cool. VPG - Long play tethered to optimus ramp. we should see industrial use cases EOY 2026 and consumer EOY 2027, so maybe optimus productions starts hitting balance sheet now or q2. OSS - Long play on defense sector and edge AI + $200m contract. INTC - long on us policy, earnings didn't really change any perspective, just short term price. UMAC - Great long play at these levels on drone manufacturing in US. ONDS, Airo, DPRO - Same with AIRO, DPRO, bullish on drone sector. There's not much of a massive tailwind compared to a few weeks ago when US was invading venezuela and threatening greenland, but thematically bullish. AVAV - selloff from misinformation about converting r&D type contracts -> long term contract presents considerable upside BULL - I do like brokerages like robinhood, webull, etc. that have a ton of retail users since there's endless ways to monetize once you own the customer base. selloff back to $8 presents attractive upsdie ETOR - selloff way overblown, high net income y/y, basically 50% cash, low downside risk. just waiting for re-rating per earnings. they're doing well too, 70%+ Y/Y AUM, so not sure why they're being priced in like this. VLN - not quite the same anymore as close to 1:1 assets/nav, at one point they had $11m+ inv (off 63%) gross margins, $93M cash, so would have been closer to 110-120m : $140m MC, which made no sense. That being said still $80m fwd revenue off 63% -> 69% gross margins, seems like considerable opportunity for re-rating. Markets just don't seem to like companies eg. Etoro related to a certain country, I guess Nebius - $15B clickhouse valuation just goes to show Sum of Parts, where I wouldn't be surpirsed if their subsidaries like Avride ended up overtaking the main business. That being said, near term selling pressure due to $2B+ ATM being sold on open market. Should ramp up extremely fast as they meet their $7B ARR target EOY 2026. GLXY, CIFR, HUT, IREN, WULF - Remain long on the colo, and other neocloud sector plays. That being said most are up 30-40%+ since 2025, so they're not exactly a strong buy anymore as they've been priced in. But lot of upside remains. Questionable VELO - Lot of people asked my opinion on this since FinX loves this stock. They have really cool customers like SpaceX, but fundamentals look terrible. ~$11.8M cash + $17.5M offering vs. ~$23M. debt. They barely have any runway left and people buying now are likely to be diluted. Velo is the perfect example of amazing customer base like IQE (EU for inP supply chain), but terrible fundamentals. SKYT - It's a great made in america supply chain company for a lot of cool stuff like quantum components or edge. Benefits from CHIP act, but very slow revenue growth. It's a lot better speculative long than Velo since it has better fundamenatls. Lower gross margins like 24%, very low operating margins, is obviously priced into MC but U.S. pure-play foundry should be a good story for premium. Bottom line are not really growing too fast though. Avoid UAVS - Endless dilution machine with over 100%+ of marketcap given over to arbitrage investors that can convert 100%+ of the shares under 25% market value to sell on retail BKKT - $300m ATM dilution right now while MC is $550m. Endless dilution machine Walmart - 43 p/e, there's no way. SLNH - Lot of dilution ahead. Palantir - Concern over valuation P/E Coreweave - Concerns over large debt, $1B+ in debt interest hurts FCF a ton. Then there's allocation/buildout for OpenAI, which has extreme, extreme concerns if they can fulfill contract obligations, especially since gemini is taking over market share of openai. Oracle - There might be technical rebound, but seriously, they've spent so much capex just for openai (eg. stargate), and like coreweave, OpenAI, which has extreme concerns over if they can fufill contracts obligations BMNR - endless dilution machine to fund silly projects like $200m into mr. beast's company. Expect long eth staking etfs, short bmnr plays, and premium to go under as $200m cash into mr. beast's company for example is not very liquid. IONQ, RGTI, QBTS - Quantum valuations are very stretched. _ Overall Thoughts: I'm personally staying extremely long, this is just personal thoughts NFI. A lot of small caps and speculative companies have already been re-rated since Jan 1st and I don't expect many of the 50-100% moves to continue (we've seen a lot of profit taking Friday on some of these names). That being said, Trump is trying to cut rates even more (another 2-3x projected), esp. since Midterms is coming up. SPY Up = better chance of getting elected. So I'm staying very long until after Midterms. That being said a lot of this helps growth, speculative companies etc. But we're already seeing this largely priced in like Rocketlab, one of my favorite longs, reaching $45B+ MC off $155m quarterly revenue, so I'm questioning valuations a bit -> pivoting a lot of positions into more value (eg. software drop or memory supercycle). Thematically I'm extremely bullish on - AI, Memory, Semis - Bottlenecks - Critical Materials, etc. Very bullish on - Made in America supply chains Bullish on - Defense Sector And would look for swing trades/recovery/re-rating for stuff like software to social media companies around now given the recent selloff.

  7. 博主回应批评改在盘中发文,并展示其过往论点均获正收益。

    感谢大家的指正。很多人私信我,认为在盘后或隔夜发布投资论点(Thesis)会因流动性不足而加剧市场波动。因此,我改为在交易时段发布我的思考过程。我无法控制市场如何为信息发现定价,也无法控制我分享观点后的影响。自发布以来,$AIRO、$AXTI、$OSS 等大多数股票上涨了 70% 且仍在上涨。像 $VLH 或 $LPTH 这样的股票也上涨了约 20-30%。我认为到目前为止,还没有任何一个论点在长期来看是亏损的。

    英文原文

    Thanks for calling me out on that. A lot of people messaged me privately that posting a thesis during after-hours/overnight would make things a lot worse due to lack of liquidity. So I end up posting my thought process during market hours instead. I have no control over how markets price in information discovery or me sharing my perspective on things. Most stocks from $AIRO, $AXTI, $OSS are up 70% since I posted and still keep going up. Stuff like $VLH or $LPTH are up roughly 20-30%. I don't think there's been a single thesis that's been red over time so far.

  8. 建仓$VPG,看好其作为$TSLA Optimus核心供应商的高BOM占比及不对称收益。

    我已建立 $VPG(市值5.73亿美元)的头寸。 这是我未来在机器人领域的主要敞口,与 $TSLA Optimus 紧密挂钩。 市场完全忽视了这一机器人板块的投资机会: 对于每一台部署的特斯拉 Optimus,$VPG 很可能占据极高的物料清单(BOM)份额。 VPG 可能是特斯拉 Optimus 量产爬坡的主要供应商,这已是公开的秘密。 这一发现最早由 Citron Research 提出(我不居功)。 2025年4月,Citron Research 发布报告,称 VPG 为“隐藏的特斯拉 Optimus 概念股”。 他们指出,VPG 在2023年11月宣布与一家人形机器人开发商达成“重大设计胜利”,就在特斯拉于2023年12月发布 Optimus Gen 2 之前。 Citron:“证据确凿:VPG 不仅向特斯拉 Optimus 供货,还预计从此次扩产中获得巨额收入,但由于保密协议,这部分收入目前对市场不可见。” 我在2025/2026年后期与多家卖方/买方分析师交叉验证了关于 VPG 的信息: 许多来自 Signia Capital 的人士提到 $VPG:“最显著的应用将是特斯拉的 Optimus 机器人,该机器人于2022年原型化,目标在2026年投产”。 然而,由于2023-2025年原型机阶段 Optimus 及其他机器人的量产爬坡并不存在,这一点被完全遗忘了。 然而,鉴于彭博社报道 OpenAI 上周推动机器人领域发展: 我预计机器人行业今年将触及拐点。 该公司基本面已经非常扎实: - 营收7970万美元(同比增长5.3%,但预计因机器人行业而指数级增长) - 毛利率40.5% - 净现金约6500万美元(现金8600万,债务2000万) $VPG 在块状金属箔(Bulk Metal Foil)材料科学/专利方面拥有护城河,引入了 Z-Foil 技术,并实现了垂直整合。虽然我不能说完全理解所有细节,但这正是 $TSLA 与 Vishay 合作进行 Optimus 迭代原型开发和规模化的原因。 关于 BOM: 有一些 BOM 估算如下: 腿部/运动系统:约21,300美元(占成本38%):集中在高扭矩执行器。 核心稳定性:约15,600美元(28%):结构性躯干和肩部机构。 灵巧手:约9,500美元(17%):执行器和 VPG 式传感器。 计算/AI:约2,100美元(4%):双 FSD 芯片和8摄像头阵列。 但总体而言,我们可以估算每台机器人的价值中约有3-8%归 $VPG 所有,因为 Shoshani 明确表示 VPG 预计每台机器人在ERs中能获得500至1,200美元的收入。 Elon 喜欢吹嘘大数字,但如果按字面意思理解“德州超级工厂年产1000万台的目标” 1000万台机器人/年 × 750美元/台 = VPG 年营收75亿美元。 考虑到 $VPG 是一家目前处于机器人供应链深处的5.74亿美元小市值公司,鉴于其不对称的上行空间,我建立了多头头寸: - 与 $TSLA Optimus 供应链的高度相关性概率高 - 每台部署机器人的 BOM 占比高 - 资产负债表非常干净,这很罕见。 请自行研究,这只是我建立多头的个人思考过程。

    英文原文

    I've initiated positions in $VPG ($573m). This is my actual/main robotics sector exposure going forward, tethered to $TSLA Optimus. Markets have completely overlooked this robotics sector play: For every Tesla Optimus deployed, $VPG likely takes an exceptionally high BOM for each. It's a pretty open secret by now that VPG is likely a main supplier for Tesla Optimus Ramp. This was first discovered by Citron Research (not taking credit for this). In April 2025, Citron Research published a report calling VPG the "Hidden Tesla Optimus Play." They pointed out that VPG announced a "major design win" with a humanoid developer in November 2023, right before Tesla revealed the Optimus Gen 2 in December 2023. Citron: "The evidence is conclusive: VPG is not only supplying Tesla Optimus but expects substantial revenues from this ramp-up, revenue currently invisible to the market due to confidentiality" I've cross-checked with recent Sellside/Buyside analysts much later in 2025/2026 regarding VPG: Many from Signia Capital mention for $VPG: "The most notable application would be Tesla’s Optimus robot, which was prototyped in 2022 and is targeting production in 2026". However, this was completely forgotten given robotics ramp from Optimus and others were nonexistent through 2023-2025 for the prototyping phase. However, given OpenAI's push to robotics last week per Bloomberg: I expect robotics to hit the inflection point this year. This company is extremely solid fundamentally already: - $79.7 Million Revenue (up 5.3% Y/Y but this should ramp up exponentially due to robotics sector) - 40.5% Gross Margins - ~$65 Million Net Cash ($86m Cash, $20m Debt) $VPG has a material science/patent moat for Bulk Metal Foil, introduced Z-Foil technology, and is vertically integrated. Can't say I understand it all, but it's the reason why $TSLA has been prototyping and scaling their Optimus iterations with Vishay. As for BOM: There are BOM estimates like: Legs/Locomotion: ~$21,300 (38% of cost): concentrated in high-torque actuators. Core Stability: ~$15,600 (28%): structural torso and shoulder mechanisms. Dexterous Hands: ~$9,500 (17%): Actuators and VPG-style sensors. Compute/AI: ~$2,100 (4%): Dual FSD chips and 8-camera array. But generally, we can estimate 3-8% of each robots value is est. $VPG since Shoshani explicitly stated that VPG expects to capture between $500 and $1,200 in revenue per robot in ERs. Elon likes to claim big numbers, but if you take it at face value "10-million-unit annual target at Giga Texas" 10M robots/year × $750/robot = $7.5 Billion in annual revenue for VPG. Considering $VPG is a small $574M company deep in the robotics supply chain right now, I entered long positions given the asymmetrical upside - of high probability correlation to $TSLA Optimus supply chains - high BOM of each robot deployed. - very clean balance sheet, which is rare. Please do your own research, this is my own personal thought process of why I entered this long.

  9. 建仓$DPRO,视其为无人机战争基础设施,类比早期$RKLB,具高增长潜力。

    我建仓了少量 $DPRO(市值2.4亿美元)。 这是一家端到端的战争无人机承包商,Draganfly 看起来像是无人机领域的 $RKLB(Relativity Space)。 $ONDS 从 0.51 美元涨到 15 美元(13倍),我一直在寻找类似的标的。 以下是市场(和我自己)之前忽略的点: Draganfly 是一家垂直整合的国防主承包商,而不仅仅是无人机制造商。 $DPRO 控制着从工厂基础设施到最终无人机的整个生态系统。它是《国防授权法案》(NDAA)禁止大疆(DJI,曾占据估计 70-80% 市场份额)后的最大受益者。 我之前没理解的最大护城河:嵌入式生产(embedded production)。 我关注的是当前较小的营收数字,却忽略了他们正在美国多个基地建设分布式制造能力。 Draganfly 与美国陆军(2025年9月)的合同不仅仅是交付无人机;而是要在美国基地安装微型工厂(Micro-Factories)。 它将 Draganfly 融入美国战争部(Dept. of War)的体系中,创造出竞争对手无法取代的“粘性”。 我建仓的原因是:他们的无人机产能从 2025 年的 500 万美元跃升至 4 亿美元。 结合其与 Global Ordnance 的合作伙伴关系(作为分包商,Ordnance 获得了 7.5 亿美元 IDIQ 合同),以及 US-CAD 项目(双方均受益,如 2.2 亿美元对北约的 CAD 资金)。 $DPRO 有可能实现三位数甚至 1000%+ 的同比增长率。 而且……营收会在财报中以惊喜的方式体现在资产负债表上。 每个无人机玩家如 $AVAV、$AIRO、$ONDS 都有自己的专长,$DPRO 专注于非动能和基础设施方面: -> 瑞典等欧洲国家(2026年)使用 $DPRO 无人机进行救生行动。 -> DEF-C -> 乌克兰冲突中的侦察无人机 -> Global Ordnance(大型国防承包商) -> 美国战争部(美国陆军) 而这些非动能无人机可以转化为动能应用。 手握 5100 万美元现金(健康的资产负债表),仅 20% 的产能爬坡就对应约 2.2 倍远期市销率(p/s)。 这是一个非常投机的风险投资式押注,因为他们正在快速扩张基础设施(就像早期的 $RKLB),Northland 给出了 20 美元的目标价。 这是一种直觉,认为营收将赶上他们在美军中部署的基础设施(特别是 Replicator 项目,且直到财报发布前都是隐藏的)。 $DPRO 在 FinX 上已经很受欢迎(说服其他用户花了一些功夫),所以我个人也加入了这场狂欢,想看看它会走向何方。 TLDR:在 $DPRO 建立少量投机性头寸,因为它有望成为无人机战争的基础设施(就像 2 美元时的 $RKLB 之于太空),具有巨大的上行潜力。 由于处于极早期阶段,随着产能建设的收入确认,也存在大量风险。

    英文原文

    I’ve initiated small positions in $DPRO ($240m). This is an end-to-end war drone contractor and Draganfly looks like the $RKLB to Ondas. $ONDS went from ($.51 -> $15, 13x) and was looking for an equivalent. Here’s what markets (and myself missed). Draganfly is a vertically integrated defense prime, not just a drone maker. $DPRO controls the entire ecosystem, from the factory infrastructure to the end-drone. And it’s the largest beneficiary of NDAA that banned DJI, which controlled est. 70-80% of market share. The biggest moat I didn’t understand earlier: embedded production. I looked small current revenue numbers but missed the that they’re buildout distributed manufacturing throughout many US bases. Draganfly’s contract with the U.S. Army (Sept 2025) isn't just to ship drones; it is to install Micro-Factories at US bases. It integrates Draganfly into the fabric of US Dpt. of War, creating a layer of "stickiness" that is impossible for competitors to displace. Here's why I entered positions: they went from $5M drone capacity ramp in 2025 to $400m. Combining this with its partnership with Global Ordnance (where it’s a sub-contractor and Ordnance received $750 Million IDIQ), US-CAD programs (benefits from both) like $220m CAD funding to NATO. It’s possible for $DPRO from triple digits or possibly 1000%+ revenue growth rates Y/Y. And... revenue hits balance sheet by surprise in the earnings. Each drone player from $AVAV, $AIRO, $ONDS, have their own specialty, $DPRO focuses on the nonkinetic and infrastructure aspect: -> European countries like Sweden use $DPRO drones (2026) for life-saving operations. -> DEF-C -> reconnaissance drones for Ukraine conflict -> Global Ordnance (massive defense contractor) -> U.S. Department of War (US Army) and those nonkinetic drones can be transformed with kinetic applications. With $51M cash on hand (healthy balance sheet), just 20% of capacity ramp would be ~2.2 fwd p/s. This is a very speculative venture style bet as they've been rapidly expanding infrastructure (like $RKLB at the start), with Northland giving $20 PT's. And this is a hunch that the revenue will catch up to the infrastructure they've deployed across the US army (esp. with Replicator programs and is hidden until earnings). $DPRO has already been popular on FinX (and it took some convincing from other users) so I've personally joined the party as I'm curious to see where it heads. TLDR: took small speculative positions in $DPRO as it's setup to be the Infrastructure of Drone Warfare (like $RKLB back at $2 for space) with high potential upside. As it's extremely early, there's lot of risks as well with revenue recognition from capacity buildout.

  10. 特朗普关税恐慌是估值礼物,国防与本土AI供应链将受益于政策博弈。

    关于$OSS -6.1%至$ONDS -4.85%下跌引发的潜在市场崩盘恐慌很多。但随着市场转红,特朗普已开始降级局势。从特朗普关税的历史来看,我们知道一件事:特朗普非常在意市场: - $AVAV的复制者(Replicator)Switchblade无人机项目 至 - 复制者2(Replicator 2)反无人机系统,$AIRO、$ONDS等可能受益。 1.5万亿美元的拟议国防支出保持不变。 AI建设中的 - $LITE、$COHR在$GOOGL和超大规模ASIC建设中的角色 或 - $INTC、$SKY在美国本土硬件中的角色 均未改变。我们正见证历史上最大的无人机、关键材料储备、AI建设、太空扩张及“美国制造”供应链的扩张。 我认为这种波动往往是“估值礼物”,因为这些都是空头威胁。欧美领导人之间的泄露消息显示对话正在进行。特朗普只是在用“极限施压”话术看能谈判到什么。当然,特朗普将标普500视为其实时支持率,这就是为什么他在中期选举前迫使大幅降息。随着美股隔夜转红,我们已看到局势缓和。我们很可能会看到完整的“贸易协议达成”,以便他宣称成功->市场创历史新高。

    英文原文

    There's a lot of panic about a potential market crash from $OSS -6.1% to $ONDS -4.85% dropping ON. But now, Trump is already starting to de-escalate as markets go red. From the history of Trump's tariffs We know one thing. Trump cares too much about the market: $1.5T in proposed defense spending from - $AVAV Replicator Switchblade drone programs to - Replicator 2 counter-UAV with potential for $AIRO, $ONDS and others. is still the same. Nothing in the AI buildout from - $LITE, $COHR role in $GOOGL and hyperscaler ASIC buildout or - $INTC, $SKY role in US domestic hardware has changed. We're seeing the largest buildup from drone, critical material stockpiles, AI buildout, Space scale-up, and Made in America supply chains in history. My opinion is that this volatility is often a "valuation gift" since these are all empty threats. And the leaked messages between the EU/US leaders shows dialogue is taking place. Trump is just doing his "Maximum Pressure" rhetoric to see what can be negotiated. And, of course, Trump views the S&P 500 as his real-time approval rating, which is why he's forcing so many rate cuts before midterm elections. As US markets go red overnight, we're seeing the walk-back happen already. And we'll likely see that full "trade-deal made" so he can claim he succeeded -> markets hit ATHs.

  11. 分析AVAV、AIRO、DPRO在美军复制者计划中的角色及风险收益特征。

    $AVAV 绝对是的。它是黄金标准,并且已经是“复制者”(Replicator) 计划的一部分。(因此与 $KTOS 一起已经取得了成功) $AIRO 用于反无人机“复制者”(Replicator),具有最高的上行潜力和最低的下行风险。 我稍后会写一篇关于 $DPRO 的文章,但它让我想起了早期阶段的 $RKLB,上行空间非常具有投机性。

    英文原文

    $AVAV definitely. It’s the gold standard and is already part of replicator. (So already successful alongside $KTOS) $AIRO is for counter UAV replicator, highest potential for lowest downside risk. I’ll do a write up on $DPRO later but it reminds me of early stage $RKLB, very speculative upside.

  12. ONDS估值虽高,但作为独立标的仍具合理性。

    @platochi @bennybigbull 与其他无人机公司如 $AIRO 相比,$ONDS 的估值(市销率)显得昂贵(28倍 vs 2.5倍)。我想表达的是,单看它本身,这是一个合理的选股标的。

    英文原文

    @platochi @bennybigbull $ONDS is richly priced compared to other drone companies like $AIRO (28 vs 2.5 p/s) Standalone it’s a justified pick, is what I’m trying to say.

  13. 作者认为$ONDS估值过高,建议关注其他估值更低的无人机股。

    个人而言,我觉得与其他无人机公司相比,$ONDS 的定价偏高。 我持有 $AVAV、$DPRO、$KTOS 和 $AIRO 以获取无人机领域的敞口。 (这只是我凭记忆随口一说,别太当真)Ondas 目前的前瞻性企业价值/收入倍数(Forward EV/revenue multiples)约为 28 倍以上。即使是 AVAV,作为“复制者”(Replicator)项目的一部分,其倍数也仅为 8-9 倍。 Airo 则是针对“复制者 2.0”的反无人机(Counter UAV)系统。 当我买入 $AIRO 时,其前瞻性市销率(Forward P/S)约为 2.5 倍(现在可能更高,也许是 3-4 倍)。 甚至 $DPRO 根据一些收入计算,可能也只有 2.8 倍左右。 所以在我看来,其他无人机公司有更高的上行空间。

    英文原文

    Personally speaking, I feel like $ONDS is richly priced compared to other drone companies. I have $AVAV, $DPRO, $KTOS, and $AIRO for drone exposure. (Just going off the top of my head, dont take this too literally) Fwd EV/revenue multiples was ~28s+ now for Ondas. Even AVAV was 8-9 and they were in the replicator program. Airo was for counter UAV for replicator 2. When I bought $AIRO was trading at ~2.5 fwd p/s (probably higher now, maybe 3-4's). Even $DPRO might even be potential 2.8 from some rev calculations. So IMO higher upside with other drone companies.

  14. 博主坚持投资论点,对多只AI供应链股进行长期持有与加仓。

    @truncateit 我确实相信我的投资论点,所以我会对像 $AIRO 和 $LPTH 这样的标的进行成本平均加仓。但如果你好奇的话,是的,我仍然持有 $OSS、$AIRO、$LPTH、$SSYS、$AXTI、$VLN 以及其他我做过尽职调查(DD)的股票,因为它们旨在作为1年期的持仓,而不是12小时的短线交易。https://t.co/uNvk2q5uYe

    英文原文

    @truncateit I actually believe in my thesis so I cost average up on stuff like $AIRO and $LPTH. But if you're curious yes I still have $OSS, $AIRO, $LPTH, $SSYS, $AXTI, $VLN, and others I do DD on since they're meant to be 1 year holds, not 12 hour ones. https://t.co/uNvk2q5uYe

  15. 列举近期持仓标的,表示将持有头寸一年以等待价值重估。

    是的?最近发布的帖子包括:用于无人机的 $AIRO、用于边缘计算的 $OSS、用于机器人的 $SSYS、用于人工智能(AI)瓶颈的 $AXTI、用于国防瓶颈的 $LPTH 以及存在定价偏差的 $VLN。自重新评级(re-rating)不会在一两天或一两周内发生,可能需要数月才能显现,因此我将持有我的头寸一年。

    英文原文

    Yes? $AIRO for drones, $OSS for edge, $SSYS for robotics, $AXTI for AI bottlenecks, $LPTH for defense bottlenecks and $VLN for mispricing were the most recent posts. I’m holding my share positions for a year since re-rating doesn’t happen in a day or week. Might take months to play out.

  16. 看好自杀式无人机板块,认为市值将追随技术演进。

    @Nerd_0ne 从 $AVAV 到 $AIRO 的自杀式无人机真的酷毙了。我认为市值最终会跟随技术路线,就像 $RKLB 那样!

    英文原文

    @Nerd_0ne Kamikaze drones from $AVAV to $AIRO are really cool. I think the marketcaps follow the tech eventually like $RKLB!

  17. $AIRO因五角大楼“复制者”计划中拦截无人机需求激增而受益,看好其大规模生产潜力。

    $AIRO 现已上涨 76.07%。 自最初发帖以来,我认为它几乎没有出现过超过 1 天的下跌(红盘)。 简单论点 TLDR:它是五角大楼“复制者(Replicator)”计划的核心,该计划旨在部署数千架低成本、可消耗无人机。 他们的“子弹无人机”基本上用于拦截无人机或巡航导弹。 并将其摧毁。 鉴于战争正转向无人机,$AIRO 仅仅因为拦截和摧毁其他大规模生产无人机所需的“子弹无人机”的巨大数量而受益。 大家都在大规模生产无人机? -> 你需要有人大规模生产能摧毁那些无人机的无人机。 大规模生产 = 更高的收入,因此做多 $AIRO

    英文原文

    $AIRO is now up 76.07%. Don’t think it’s had more than 1 red day since the original posts. Simple thesis TLDR: central to Pentagon "Replicator", which aims to field thousands of low-cost, disposable drones. Their “bullet drone” basically intercepts drones or cruise missiles. And destroys them. Given warfare is moving to drones, $AIRO just benefits from the sheer, sheer amount of bullet drones needed to intercept and destroy the mass production of other drones. Everyone mass producing drones? -> You need someone to mass produce drones that destroy those drones. Mass production = higher revenue, hence long $AIRO

  18. 博主分享今日逢低买入LPTH、AIRO和VLN的操作。

    @MRonvelwala 我个人在今天 $LPTH 和 $AIRO 下跌 4% 时买入,并在 $VLN 下跌 8% 时买入。 看起来 SPY 下跌了 0.8%,因此由恐惧带来的良好机会很多。

    英文原文

    @MRonvelwala I personally bought $LPTH and $AIRO on 4% drop today and $VLN on the -8% drop. Looks like SPY is down -.8% so lot of good opportunities out there from fear.

  19. 分析UMAC基本面优势,对比AIRO,认为两者均有上行空间。

    很棒的选择。$UMAC 是一个很好的长线标的。我之前研究时选择了 $AIRO,但很难得有一家市值 5.2 亿美元、拥有 1.33 亿美元现金且无债务、毛利率 40%、同比增长 55%+ 的制造商。它是通过 $RCAT 向 $AVAV 供货的供应商。类似于 $POET 和 $MRVL 的情况。因此上行空间很大,我个人仍然更喜欢 $AIRO,但各有所好!

    英文原文

    Great choice. $UMAC is a great long. I ended up going with $AIRO when I looked into it earlier but it’s rare you have a $520m mc manufacturer that has - $133m cash, no debt - 40% gross margins - growing 55%+ y/y As a supplier to $AVAV through $RCAT. Similar to $POET $MRVL situation. So lot of upside, I still like $AIRO a lot more personally but to each their own!

  20. 看好$AIRO,认为其具备更高上行潜力

    @__visionxry__ $AIRO 具有更高的上行空间

    英文原文

    @__visionxry__ $AIRO for higher upside

  21. 计划研究VVX,已买入AIRO替代ONDS,承认研究存在遗漏。

    @Rachel308649775 提到 $VVX 这个名字很有趣,我稍后会去研究一下。 是的,我最终买入了 $AIRO,因为它比 $ONDS 便宜得多,但我确信在我的研究中肯定还漏掉了其他标的。

    英文原文

    @Rachel308649775 Interesting name drop with $VVX I’ll take a look soon. Yeah I ended up buying $AIRO since it was much cheaper than $ONDS but I’m sure there was others I missed in my research

  22. Alpha源于发现市场盲区,等待机构验证即已错过最佳时机。

    没错,和 $VLN 一样。最大的利润来自于发现别人未发现的机会。 我觉得大家都在抱怨“为什么在它涨400%之前你不告诉我”,就像 $MU 那样在顶部蜂拥而入。 然后当我在早期发布像 $AIRO、$AXTI、$OSS 或 $VLN 这类内容,而它们下周就上涨50%+时,他们又抱怨。 散户认为 $AXTI 是某种随机的“拉高出货(pump and dump)”股票,但在其上涨100%+后,现在有了机构验证。 再说一次,超额收益(alpha)来自于发现大多数市场忽略的东西。等到机构告诉你买入时,你就已经错过了。

    英文原文

    Yep, same as $VLN. The most money to be made is when you discover things others don't. I feel like everyone complains about "Why didn't you tell me about this stock before it went up 400%" as people pile on at the top like $MU. Then complain when I post about stuff like $AIRO, $AXTI, $OSS, or $VLN at the start and they go up 50%+ the next week. Retail thinks $AXTI is some random pump and dump stock, but now you have institutional validation after a 100%+ move. Again, alpha is when you discover things majority of markets miss. You miss out by the time you wait for institutions to tell you to buy.

  23. 继续加仓 AVAV,同时持有 AIRO 覆盖无人机攻防

    @SayNoToTrading 对,我一直在向上摊高 $AVAV 的成本!我的 $AIRO 仓位表现也很好。 我把两边都覆盖了: $AIRO 做拦截无人机,用来反制无人机攻击(子弹拦截器)。 $AVAV 负责无人机打击。 两个都很酷。

    英文原文

    @SayNoToTrading Yeah I’ve been cost averaging up on $AVAV! My $AIRO positions have been doing great as well. I’ve got all the grounds covered: $AIRO interceptor drones to counter drone strikes (bullet interceptor) $AVAV does the drone striking Both are super cool

  24. AIRO估值远低于同行,重估至AVAV水平仍有3倍空间,继续持仓。

    在我看来,$AIRO 还有很长的路要走,这也是我继续持仓的原因。其交易估值约为3倍远期市销率(Forward P/S),而其他无人机股票则超过30倍。当然,由于存在来自其他垂直领域的混合收入,情况更为复杂。但即使重新估值至保守的航空航天公司如 $AVAV,其价格也将是当前价格的3倍。

    英文原文

    $AIRO has a long way to go in my opinion, which is why I’m still holding. Trading at ~3 frwd p/s while other drone stocks are 30+. Of course this is more nuanced since there’s blended revenue from other verticals. But even rerating to conservative aerospace companies like $AVAV would be 3x current prices.

  25. 博主计划持有AIRO和OSS至年底,看好国防支出红利。

    两股“战争部”股票的启示:$AIRO 和 $OSS。 如果你将信息发现与1.5万亿美元的国防支出顺风相结合,就能获得丰厚回报。 自几天前发帖以来,两者均上涨50%以上。我个人计划在我的10倍潜力篮子中持有它们直到年底。

    英文原文

    A tale of two Department of War stocks $AIRO | $OSS. Information discovery pays dividends if you couple that with the $1.5T Defense spending tailwinds. Both up 50%+ since posting a few days ago. I personally plan to hold them until EOY in my 10x potential basket. https://t.co/7N0ExxEq8c

  26. Bressner出售利好$OSS,市场将重估其高利润率防御业务,整体看涨。

    微妙之处在于,Bressner 的出售极其积极。我最初没有买入 $OSS,因为其部门搞乱了综合利润率计算。但在发现其纯防御垂直领域的利润率后,我意识到它极其专业化。市场也会意识到这一点,并将其估值从大宗商品地位重估为高科技国防承包商溢价。算法可能会因营收变化而误解,但做多该股的投资者会认为这对他们持仓极为有利,因为这是一个高利润率、需求大于供给的垂直领域正在扩张。此外,还有 1.5 万亿美元的国防支出流向这家小型国防承包商以及像 $AIRO 这样的无人机公司,因此我对该股整体看涨(尤其是在向机器人领域过渡时)。

    英文原文

    Nuanced, the Bressner sale is extremely extremely positive. I didn’t enter $OSS originally because that division messed up blended margin calculations. But after discovering their pure play defense vertical and margins, I realized it was extraordinarily specialized. Market will realize that too and re-rate it from commodity status to a high tech dod contractor premium. Algorithmically they might misunderstand from revenue changes but the people who long the stock will see this as incredibly positive on their position scaling a high margin, demand > capacity vertical. Then there’s the $1.5T in defense spend following down to this small defense contractor and drone companies like $AIRO, so just bullish all around on the stock (esp as we transition to robotics)

  27. 作者澄清其推文旨在通过新颖分析测试论点,而非投资建议。

    我的意思是,我关于 $AXTI 和 $AIRO 的大部分帖子都是基于公开信息的新型信息综合。所以,如果市场发现 AXT 是人工智能供应链的单点故障,导致其股价上涨 100%,这是合乎情理的。或者在这种情况下,市场不知道 $OSS 在委内瑞拉的参与。除此之外,我只是发布我的思考过程或新颖分析,以测试我的论点与市场反应。这不是建议,也不推荐他人跟随。

    英文原文

    I mean most of my posts from $AXTI and $AIRO are novel information synthesis based on public info. So makes sense if stuff like AXT goes up 100% once markets find out it’s the single point of failure for the AI supply chain. Or in this case markets didn’t know about $OSS involvement in Venezuela. That aside I’m just posting my own thought process or just novel analysis to test my thesis against the markets. Not advice or recommending others to follow along.

  28. 感谢提及,关注AXTI和AIRO走势,期待OSS后续表现。

    @pepemoonboy 感谢提及,你的期权卖出挑战目前进展顺利!最近观察 $AXTI 和 $AIRO 确实很有趣。很好奇 $OSS 接下来会如何表现。

    英文原文

    @pepemoonboy Appreciate the shoutout and looking good so far on your option selling challenge! It’s definitely been fun watching $AXTI and $AIRO recently. Curious how $OSS does next.

  29. AXTI和AIRO短期暴涨,深入研究后对OSS持看多态度。

    @B38B37 观察 $AXTI 和 $AIRO 的走势真是令人捧腹,两者在一周左右的时间里都上涨了50%以上。 不过,在深入研究该公司,特别是委内瑞拉入侵事件及其受益者后,我对 $OSS 相当看好。

    英文原文

    @B38B37 $AXTI and $AIRO have been hilarious to watch both are up 50%+ in a week or so. I’m pretty bullish on $OSS though after looking into company, esp. Venezuelan invasion and beneficiaries.

  30. 建仓$OSS,认为其作为边缘AI国防承包商获实战验证,高毛利且被低估。

    我建仓了 $OSS。 我通常不说这种话,但这只股票令人兴奋。 市场完全错过了这家市值1.55亿美元的无人机群、幽灵舰队、无人水面艇(USV)、边缘AI部署的美国国防部承包商。 他们尤其错过了 OSS 在委内瑞拉入侵行动中的参与,这给 $AVAV 等股票带来了溢价。 在我看来,这看起来像是一个“邪恶”的长线机会: 1. 4100万美元现金(预计)/ 1.55亿美元市值(下行风险低)。 2. 纯动能防御(Pure play Kinetic Defense)标的。 3. 供需比为 1:2.4(因需求旺盛而积压)。 4. 45%的毛利率。 主要兴趣点在于委内瑞拉作为其在美国军队中实际使用的证明: $OSS P-8 海神在委内瑞拉: - 飞行追踪数据证实,第40巡逻中队(VP-40)的 P-8A 海神飞机在突袭期间在委内瑞拉海岸附近,以监控委内瑞拉海军动向。 OSS 关联:2025年7月1日,OSS 宣布了一项500万美元的紧急订单,专门用于为 P-8A 海神交付“61台加固数据单元”。 SOCOM “抓捕小组”: - 抓捕领导层的突袭由美国特种作战司令部(USSOCOM)执行,具体使用了海上插入团队(可能是海豹突击队/SWCC)和第160特种作战航空团(直升机)。 OSS 关联:2025年5月29日,OSS 直接与 USSOCOM 签署了合作研发协议(CRADA),为海洋环境制造边缘计算机。OSS 为潜入委内瑞拉海岸的隐形船只构建了战斗追踪服务器。 “幽灵舰队”封锁: - “南方长矛行动”目前正在使用无人水面艇(无人机船)封锁油轮。 OSS 关联:海军的“第59特遣队”(以及较新的第4舰队等效部队)在这些无人机上使用 $OSS Rigel 边缘超级计算机,因为它是少数能装入40英尺机器人船的小型AI服务器之一。 这字面意义上是委内瑞拉的实战验证。对于一家市值1.55亿美元的小公司而言。 在之前,每个人都把这家公司当作像 $SMCI 那样的大宗商品(包括我自己),但我完全错过了他们的国防垂直领域(在出售 Bressner 后现在是纯标的)拥有45.6%的毛利率。 直到我再次深入研究后,才意识到他们的另一个部门因为混合毛利率(仅转售国防装备)完全搞乱了毛利计算。 所以现在我们有一个: ~45%毛利率,估值1.55亿美元,拥有4100万美元现金,需求超出供应2.4倍的AI军事承包商。 去年晚些时候我做了一个分析,当时看起来 $OSS 是 Andruil 或 $PLTR 的供应商,并开始爬坡。 再次审视出售后的情况,45%的毛利率使他们进入极其卓越的领域(例如洛克希德·马丁,12-14%)或大宗商品卖家(例如 $SMCI,$DELL 8-14%)。 这是一个经过战争验证的专用防御AI纯标的,用于无人机群、幽灵舰队、USV等,具有极高的毛利率,市值1.55亿美元。 我发现这是一个令人兴奋的重新发现,所以我建仓了。

    英文原文

    I've initiated a position in $OSS. I usually never say this but, this one is exciting. Markets completely missed this 155M MC Drone Swarm, Ghost Fleet, USVs, Edge AI deploying US DoD contractor. And they especially missed OSS’s involvement in the Venezuela's invasion, that gave premiums to $AVAV and others. This looks like an unholy long to me: 1. $41M cash (pro forma ets.) / $155M MC (low downside risk). 2. Pure play Kinetic Defense 3. 1 : 2.4x supply/demand. (backlogged from high demand) 4. 45% gross margins. The main interest was Venezuela as proof they're actively being used in the US military: $OSS P-8 Poseidon in Venezuela: - Flight tracking data confirmed that P-8A Poseidon aircraft from Patrol Squadron 40 (VP-40) were off the coast of Venezuela during the raid to monitor Venezuelan naval movements. OSS Link: On July 1 2025, OSS announced a $5M urgent order specifically to deliver "61 Rugged Data Units" for the P-8A Poseidon. SOCOM "Capture Team": - The raid to capture leadership was executed by US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), specifically using maritime insertion teams (likely SEALs/SWCC) and the 160th SOAR (helicopters). OSS Link: On May 29, 2025, OSS signed a (CRADA) directly with USSOCOM to build edge computers for Maritime Environments. OSS built the battle-tracking servers for the stealth boats used to slip into the Venezuelan coast. "Ghost Fleet" Blockade: - "Operation Southern Spear" is currently using unmanned surface vessels (drone boats) to block oil tankers. OSS Link: The Navy's "Task Force 59" (and the newer 4th Fleet equivalent) uses the $OSS Rigel Edge Supercomputer for these drones because it is one of the few AI servers small enough to fit on a 40-foot robot boat. This is literally combat validation in Venezuela. Of a small $155M stock. Before everyone treated this company as a commodity like $SMCI (myself included), but I completely missed that their defense vertical (which is pure-play now after the Bressner sale) has 45.6% gross margins. Only after I looked into it again after did I realize their other division was completely messing up margin calculations because of blended margins (from just re-selling defense gear). So now we have a: ~45% margins, AI military contractor valued at $155M business with $41m cash, with demand outstripping supply 2.4 to 1. I did an analysis later last year, which looked like $OSS was a supplier for Andruil or $PLTR, and was beginning their ramp up. Looking at it again post-sale, the 45% margin puts them into extremely stellar territory (compared to eg. Lockheed Martin, 12-14%) or commodity sellers (eg. $SMCI, $DELL 8-14%) This is a specialized war-validated defense AI pure-play for drone swarms, ghost fleets, USVs, and others, with extremely high margins, at $155M MC. I've found this to be an exciting re-discovery, so I've taken a position.

  31. 作者对比了CRDO的抄底难度与SNDK/MU的持有策略,并提及AIRO反弹案例。

    谢谢,不过 Credo 对我来说更多是个人交易标的。但当走势像“飞刀”时($CRDO 上月以来下跌超 35%),真的很难抄底。相比之下,全仓转入 $SNDK 和 $MU 然后不动它要容易得多。像 $AIRO 这种看似“飞刀”的标的后来反弹了 48%,所以如果操作得当,抄底其实很赚钱。不过我们得看看我的解读是否正确,我很享受用市场来测试自己的理论。

    英文原文

    Thanks, Credo is personally more of a trade for me though. But it's really hard to time the bottoms when things look like a falling knife ( $CRDO down 35%+ since last month). Much easier to just full port it into $SNDK and $MU and just not touch it. Stuff like $AIRO looked like a falling knife too then recovered 48%, so bottom catching is quite profitable if done right. We'll see if my interpretation is correct though, I have a fun time testing my own theories against the markets.

  32. 澄清$AIRO因递延收入被误读导致抛售,下季将确认。

    @Mr__Cause 那是递延收入(deferred revenue),而非流失收入。$AIRO 将在下季度确认这笔收入,但由于市场误解,所谓的“大幅不及预期”引发了抛售。

    英文原文

    @Mr__Cause That was deferred revenue, not lost revenue. $AIRO will recognize it next quarter but that “huge miss” caused the selloff since it was misunderstood.

  33. 建仓$AIRO,看好其低估值及国防无人机订单带来的反弹机会。

    我在 $AIRO 上建立了一个头寸,自3天前发布该帖以来已上涨+23%。 尽管 $ONDS 备受炒作,市场似乎仍不了解这只航空航天与国防股票。 这是一家无人机股票,市值约3亿美元,2026年预估收入超1.2亿美元(约2.5倍远期市销率)。 其他同类公司交易倍数为30-40+倍,而像 $AVAV 这样的大公司交易倍数约为9.3倍市销率。 这源于其2025-2026年1.9亿美元的订单指引,减去预估的2025财年约8690万美元及增长部分。 该板块正迎来巨大顺风,来自委内瑞拉/乌克兰的军事冲突以及1万亿美元的国防部国防支出。 $AIRO 已拥有来自北约+乌克兰武装部队的订单积压,包括如 RQ-35 Heidrun 等无人机,专为GPS拒止环境设计(乌克兰-俄罗斯冲突)。 由于其高管团队的历史,存在很大的执行不确定性,但我喜欢以下几点: - 无人机+国防板块变得极其火热 - 该股市销率处于极低水平 - 他们构建的东西很酷,就像我15美元买入 $RKLB 时一样 + 在2025年第三季度,AIRO 因发货延迟严重未达收入预期(报告630万美元 vs 较高预期)。然而,这只是递延收入,股价从30美元跌至10美元,我认为这是一个独特的机会。 这只是一个“淋浴思考”帖,绝非深入尽职调查。关键在于执行,且该股似乎没有任何溢价。 所以,我建仓 $AIRO 只是为了看看它会走向何方。

    英文原文

    I’ve taken a position in $AIRO and it’s up +23% since this post 3 days ago. Markets still don’t know about this Aerospace & Defense stock, despite $ONDS hype. It’s a drone stock ~$300m MC, with $120m+ est. for 2026 (~2.5 fwd p/s) Others trade at 30-40+ multiples and bigger companies trade at ~9.3 p/s like $AVAV. This stems from their $190M guidance for 2025-2026 bookings subtracted by est. FY 2025 ~$86.9M + growth. There’s a huge tailwind for the sector coming from military conflicts in Venezuela/Ukraine and $1T DoD spending into defense. $AIRO already has order backlog from NATO + Ukraine armed forces for drones like RQ-35 Heidrun, designed for GPS-denied environments (Ukraine - Russia conflicts). There’s a lot of execution uncertainty due to their executive team history, but i like how: - Drone + Defense segment becoming extremely hot -this one trading at extremely low levels of P/S -what they’re building is cool like when I bought $RKLB at $15 + In Q3 2025, AIRO missed revenue expectations badly ($6.3M reported vs. higher expectations) due to shipment delays. However, this is just deferred revenue, the stock dropped from $30 -> $10, I thought this could be a unique opportunity. This is just a shower-thought post, by no means in-depth DD. Name of the game is execution, and this doesn’t seem to have any premiums. So, I’ve taken a position in $AIRO just to see where it goes.

  34. 推荐$AIRO,低市销率且订单积压充足,但非委内瑞拉事件直接受益者。

    @init_malachi 如果你觉得错过了机会,还有像 $AIRO 这样的公司。它的市值为3亿美元,在无人机领域的2025/2026年订单积压约为2亿美元,且拥有6000多万美元的现金储备。与同行相比,其市销率(P/S)极低,但并未直接参与委内瑞拉的接管行动。

    英文原文

    @init_malachi There’s companies like $AIRO too if you feel you missed out, it’s $300m mc, with ~$200m or so order backlog for 2025/2026 in drones and $60m+ cashpile. P/S is extremely low compared to others, but not really directly involved in the Venezuela takeover

  35. $AIRO 现金充裕且属热门赛道,因收入递延被错杀,具备上行潜力。

    从基金/垂直领域而非高管团队的角度来看待 $AIRO。例如,@chamath 直到获得 Groq 200 亿美元退出才摆脱负面评价;Saylor 直到 $MSTR 完成“劫案”式操作前只是个梗。这确实有很大影响,但并非全部。 就 $AIRO / $ONDS 而言,鉴于俄乌冲突、北约及国防部向无人机领域注资,该垂直领域应享有溢价(但 Airo 却像困境股一样交易)。 RQ-35 Heidrun 知识产权在无 GPS 环境中极具吸引力。但他们有大量如培训等杂项业务,只是支线任务。 类似 $SMCI,$AIRO 的暴跌也是由积压订单延迟导致(630 万美元 vs 2370 万美元的不及预期)。但 2000 万美元的无人机发货只是推迟而非取消。 净现金 6880 万美元,考虑到其 2.5 亿美元的小市值,这非常稳健。其企业价值/收入倍率为 2.1 倍,而 $AVAV 为 9.4 倍。我印象中 $ONDS 约为 20-30 倍。 总之:现金状况稳健,垂直领域具吸引力,下跌源于收入递延而非取消,低市值带来良好上行空间。 鉴于现金状况及仅属收入递延,它不应像困境股那样交易。

    英文原文

    Looking @ $AIRO from the fund/vertical not the exec team. For example, @chamath was frowned upon until he got that 20B Groq exit. Or Saylor was a meme until $MSTR pulled off a heist. It does make a large difference, but it's not everything. In terms of $AIRO / $ONDS, especially with Russia/Ukraine conflicts + NATO + DoD funneling money into drone segments, the vertical should command a premium (but Airo, trades like it's distressed). The RQ-35 Heidrun IP, seemed extremely interesting for GPS-denied environments. But they have a ton of misc companies like training that are just side quests. So similar to $SMCI, there was also backlog delays with caused the crash in Airo (the $6.3M vs $23.7M miss). But the $20m drone shipments was just shifted not cancelled. Net cash is $68.8M which is extremely solid given its mini $250m MC, and it trades at 2.1x EV to revenue, compared to others like $AVAV at 9.4x. I think $ONDS was like 20-30 off the top of my head. So TLDR: solid cash position, attractive vertical, drop based on differed revenue not cancelled, low market cap presents good upside. It shouldn't trade like a distressed company because of cash position + just deferred rev.

  36. 2026年1月1日美股评级:推荐SMCI、INTC等复苏及AI基建标的,回避高估量子及零售股。

    欢迎来到2026年。1月1日评级: 强烈买入: $TTD $SMCI $AIRO $INTC $HIMS $AXTI $TSM $NBIS $CIFR 三星电子 (KRX: 005930) $HUT $IREN $WULF $GLXY $TSSI $META $ETOR $CRCL 买入: $KRKNF $ONDS $GEMI $NVDA $MU $AMKR SK海力士 $SNAP $RDDT $AAOI $COHR $FISV $FLY $DJT $LITE $AMZN $MRVL $AVGO $OSS $BULL $ORCL $CRDO $ALAB 回避: $RGTI $QBTS $RGTI $BMNR $ETH $PLTR $WMT _ 简而言之的想法: TTD - 估值完全重置,年初至今下跌67%,叠加年底税务抛售。进入2026年是极佳的复苏标的。 SMCI - 仅因推迟一个季度以符合新Blackwell规格而交易得像一家困境公司。前瞻收入同比增长50%,市销率(P/S)接近0.5。税务收割后的极佳复苏标的。 AIRO - 资产负债表约1/6为现金。随着政府加速投资,无人机领域备受追捧。另一只被抛售的IPO新股。进入2026年,尤其在热门细分领域,是极佳的复苏标的。市销率约3.8倍,相比ONDS的25-30倍市销率,当然其教育等业务对利润率计算有很大干扰。 INTC - 它实际上已成为美国政府的半导体臂膀。超大规模云厂商很可能被激励(强烈施压)在有机会时优先使用Intel而非TSM、三星等。我不会赌美国政府会输。 HIMS - 进入2026年前大幅抛售。从70多美元下跌。销售/流量下降,但Zava收购/增长应在2026年带来巨大顺风。尤其是有数亿美元回购,前两个月是强劲的复苏标的。 AXTI - 之前发过相关论点。CEO称“40%的磷化铟(InP)供应链”,InP将是2026-2027年超大规模AI建设中的巨大瓶颈,直到2028年有足够时间通过工程手段绕过它。 TSM - 我引用过很多次。利润率提升。需求最大化。未来几年极好的复利增长者。 三星电子 - 受益于代工/存储。在所有顺风助力业务方面简直是金蛋。 NBIS - 极强买入,$7-90亿年度经常性收入(ARR),它实际上是5家不同公司,每年三位数增长。管理层引用20-30%息税前利润(EBIT)率,这只是等待游戏。 CIFR, HUT, IREN, WULF, GLXY - 整个数据中心板块在Oracle/OpenAI担忧后极度超卖。OpenAI最近融资$400亿,$AMZN再投$100亿等。因此关于资本支出(Capex)的担忧已大幅降低风险。这也是多方面的,例如比特币下跌影响$CIFR资产负债表,$GLXY在加密领域。但总体而言,新云(neoclouds)板块有巨大的复苏/扩张潜力。 TSSI - 类似SMCI。递延收入=核弹级利空。税务收割后应恢复,且大量收入将被确认。 META - 财报后因一次性税务问题遭遇巨大算法抛售。他们还削减了现实实验室等部门的资本支出/运营支出,这应为2026年的每股收益(EPS)带来巨大顺风。 ETOR - 市值$28亿,坐拥$12亿现金,仍保持双位数同比增长。$1.5亿回购应是不错的顺风,且年初至今表现带来的税务收割效应应会消退。 CRCL - 稳定币论点在2026年应非常稳固。 买入 KRKNF - Anduril合作伙伴+规模。2026年可能转板,国防支出带来大量顺风。 ONDS - 收入增长极具爆炸性,到处都有新的$1000万合同。大量现金余额资助研发。市销率很高,但该领域的投机性领导者如RKLB有估值溢价。 GEMI - 通常我不喜欢交易所,但Gemini从$30+ IPO跌至$10以下。极佳的复苏标的。 NVDA - 巨大的积压订单。大家都知道Nvidia的牛市逻辑。 MU - 存储火热。 SK海力士 - 存储火热。 AMKR - 受益于“美国制造”芯片生产扩张。 SNAP - 存储运营支出削减,存储货币化增加收入,Perplexity贡献$4亿。季度收入$15亿。如果他们将所有这些转化为$10亿+自由现金流(FCF)/年,即使收入完全停止增长,也会完全重估Snap。 RDDT - 说实话,未来10+年不会消失。它是社交媒体界的Robinhood,通过新的收入货币化方式极速增长,且极其盈利。 AAOI - Amazon, MSFT ASIC规模化的互连标的。 COHR - 受益于下一代ASIC的光子学部署。 FISV - 财报后抛售过多,税务收割后是强劲的复苏标的。 FLY - SpaceX IPO带动太空领域火热。税务收割结束后应表现良好,且即将有Northrop的中期催化剂。 DJT - 我从没想过会把它放在这里,但这只是因为他们的TAE合并。 LITE - Google TPU部署带来巨大的物料清单(BOM),估值有吸引力。Google TPU修正预估后轻微抛售,但它基本存在于每个超大规模ASIC部署中。 AMZN - 七大科技巨头中估值不过高的一个。 MRVL - 分析师误导导致抛售,进入2026年强烈买入。尤其是MSFT Maia收入翻倍时,Marvell当前收入也将随之增长。 AVGO - 像NVDA一样,随着AI基础设施部署加速,强劲的长期持有标的。 OSS - 我曾发帖推测他们是Anduril的供应商之一。但无论如何,边缘计算在2026年将很火热,其1.8亿市值呈现有吸引力的上行空间。 BULL - 类似Robinhood,拥有巨大用户群,但他们只需找出货币化方法。 Oracle - 我认为抛售过多。几个月前我将其列入回避,但从$330跌至$190后,尤其在OpenAI再融资$400亿后,再次具有吸引力。 CRDO - 极高利润率,数据中心部署所需的必要连接。 ALAB - 极高利润率,数据中心部署所需的必要连接。 回避: 有很多在“高估名单”上的东西,比如$RKLB,我喜欢但除了这些之外我不会说回避它们。 RGTI, QBTS, RGTI - 量子名称仍然高估,且可能在未来几年无法交付自由现金流。 BMNR, ETH - 如果你看过我的ETH帖子,我不太看多,因为每天ETH燃烧量只是个位数到低双位数,这简直是笑话。 PLTR - 最被高估的AI名称之一。 WMT - 这怎么是40倍市盈率?这是沃尔玛? __ (这些基于今日价格) 简而言之: Circle, Etoro, AIRO, Klarna, Figma等IPO名称在下跌+税务收割后进入2026年呈现有吸引力的上行空间。 大量如SMCI, HIMS等过去3个月下跌约40%的名称,在税务收割+一月效应后是极好的波段/复苏交易标的。 许多如FiserV或The Trade Desk等暴跌的名称在税务收割后也是良好的复苏交易标的。 许多数据中心股票如nebius, iren, cifr, wulf, galaxy也是极好的复苏交易标的。 许多其他领域如存储、瓶颈、光子学等在2026年只是极好的长期持有标的,尽管各自都触及历史新高。 仍有相当多高估的名称,从量子到某些太空股票(如planet或rocketlab),特定AI名称如Palantir到零售股票如沃尔玛,我可能会暂时回避,直到有轻微回调。 这只是一个简而言之,如果我仅做短期交易(非长期),但欢迎提问。

    英文原文

    Welcome to 2026. Jan 1st ratings: Strong Buy: $TTD $SMCI $AIRO $INTC $HIMS $AXTI $TSM $NBIS $CIFR Samsung Electronics (KRX: 005930) $HUT $IREN $WULF $GLXY $TSSI $META $ETOR $CRCL Buy: $KRKNF $ONDS $GEMI $NVDA $MU $AMKR SK Hynix $SNAP $RDDT $AAOI $COHR $FISV $FLY $DJT $LITE $AMZN $MRVL $AVGO $OSS $BULL $ORCL $CRDO $ALAB Avoid: $RGTI $QBTS $RGTI $BMNR $ETH $PLTR $WMT _ TLDR thoughts: TTD - Complete valuation reset dropping 67% YTD, compounded by EOY tax sell-off. Great recovery play going into 2026. SMCI - Trades like distressed company just because they delayed revenue by 1 quarter for new blackwell specs. Forward revenue is increasing 50% Y/Y, P/S close to .5 now. Great recovery play from tax harvesting. AIRO - Roughly ~1/6th balance sheet was cash. Everyone seems to be into drones, especially with accelerated gov inevstments. Another IPO name that got sold off. Great recovery play going into 2026 with esp. hot segment. Roughly ~3.8x P/S compared to ONDS trading at 25-30 P/S, but obviously there's quite a lot of other businesses like their education sector which messed up margin calculations quite a bit. INTC - It's literally become the semi arm of the US government. Hyperscalers will likely be incentived (strongly pressured) to use Intel whatever chance it gets over TSM, Samsung, etc. I would not bet against the US government. HIMS - Huge selloff going into 2026. Down from $70's. Sales/Traffic is down, but Zava acquisition/growth should add a huge tailwind going into 2026. Esp. with few hundred mill buybacks, strong recovery play first two monts in. AXTI - Posted thesis on this earlier. CEO - "40% of Inp supply chain", InP will be a huge, huge bottleneck for hyperscaler AI buildout 2026-2027 until there's enough time to engineer around it in 2028. TSM - I've covered this quote a lot. Increasing margins. Maxed out demand. Just extremely good compounder next few years. Samsung Electronics - benefits from foundry/memory. just golden egg regarding all the tailwinds helping the buisness. NBIS - Extremely strong buy, $7-9B ARR, it's literally 5 different companies growing triple digits Y/Y. management quoted 20-30% EBIT margins, it's just a waiting agme. CIFR, HUT, IREN, WULF, GLXY - Whole datacenter space is extremely sold off after Oracle/OpenAI fears. OpenAI recently raised $40B, another $10B from $AMZN, and more. So a lot of fears regarding capex spend has been de-risked. It's multifaceted too, eg. Bitcoin drop, affects $CIFR balance sheet, $GLXY in crypto space. But generally huge recovery play/ramp for neoclouds sector. TSSI - Similar to SMCI. deferred revenue = nuke. Should recover after tax harvesting + lot of revenue gets recognized META - Huge algorithmic selloff post earnings due to one-time tax. They also cut capex/opex spend of their reality labs and other departments and this should be a huge tailwind for EPS going into 2026. ETOR - Literally sitting on $1.2B with a $2.8B marketcap and growing double digits Y/Y still. $150M buyback should be a nice tailwind, and tax harvesting from YTD performance should subside. CRCL - Same as stablecoin thesis should be really solid going into 2026 Buy KRKNF - Anduril partner+ scale. Probable uplisting in 2026, lot of tailwinds from defense spending. ONDS -pretty explosive revenue growth, new $10m contracts left and right. large cash balance to fund r&d. Pretty high p/s but there's valuation premiums for speculative leaders in the space like rklb. GEMI - So i typically dont like exchanges, but gemini got nuked from $30+ IPO sub $10. pretty solid recovery play. NVDA - Huge backlog lol. Everyone knows bull case for nvidia MU - Memory is hot SK Hynix - Memory is hot AMKR - benefits from "made in america" chip expansion in prod. SNAP - Opex Cut from memory, increase revenue from memory monetization, $400m from perplixity. $1.5B revenue/quarter. They could literally stop growing revenue complelty if they convert all of that to $1B+ FCF/year, it would re-rate snap completly. RDDT - This is not going anywhere for the next 10+ years tbh, it's like robinhood of social media, growing extremely fast from new ways to monetize revenue, and just extrmeely profitable. AAOI - interconnect play for amzn, msft asic scale up. COHR - benefits from photonics rollout for next gen asics. FISV - Nuked a bit too much post ER, strong recovery play esp. post tax-harves.t FLY - Space is hot from SpaceX IPO. Should do well given tax harvesting is over, and they have medium lift coming up with northrop. DJT - I never thought i'd put this here lol, but this is just because of their TAE merger. LITE - Large BOM from Google TPU rollout, attractive valuation. Slight selloff after Google TPU revised est. but it's basically in every single hyperscaler asic deployment. AMZN - one of the mag7 that's not overvalued MRVL - Selloff from analyst misinformation, strong buy going into 2026. Especially with msft maia revenue doubling Marvell's current revenue when it ramps up AVGO - Like NVDA just strong long, as AI infrastructure deployment ramps up OSS - I made a post speculating that they're one of andruils' suppliers. but regardless, edge computing will be hot 2026 and its 180m mc presents attracctive upside. BULL - similar to robinhood where they have a huge userbase, but they just need to figure out monetization Oracle - Sold off a bit too much imo. I put this on avoid months ago but after the from from $330 to $190, it's more attractive again esp. after openai raised another $40B CRDO -extremely high margin, necessary connectivity for dc rollout ALAB - extremely high margin, necessary connectivity for dc rollout Avoid: There's a lot of stuff on the "overvalued list" like $RKLB that i like but I wouldn't quite say avoid it either aside from these. RGTI , QBTS, RGTI - Quantum names are still overvalued and likely won't deliver fcf in the next few ytears. BMNR, ETH - if you saw my eth post, not exactly bullish since the amount of ETH burn is just single-low double digits every day, which is a joke. PLTR - one of the most overvalued ai names WMT - How is this 40 p/e? This is Walmart? __ (these are based on today's prices) TLDR: IPO names like Circle, Etoro, AIRO, Klarna, Figma, present attractive upsides post drop + tax harvesting going into 2026. Tons of names like SMCI, HIMS that dropped 40% or so past 3 months, are amazing swing/recovery trades post-tax harvest + Jan effect. Lot of the names that doom dropped like FiserV or The Trade Desk present good recovery trades too post-tax harvest. Many datacenter stocks like nebius, iren, cifr, wulf, galaxy, are amazing recovery trades too. Lot of other segments like memory, bottlenecks, photonics, and others are just great longs in 2026, despite each hitting ATHs. There's still quite a lot of overvalued names from Quantum, to certain Space stocks (eg. planet or rocketlab), specific AI names like Palantir to retail stocks like Walmart that I would probably avoid for the time being until there's a slight correction. This was a TLDR just if I'm short term trading-only (not long term) but feel free to ask questions.