· 方法论

概述自己的打法:先识别新兴赛道,再沿整条供应链做多,同时强调风控和透明。

涉及标的:

中文翻译

如果你现在还不了解我的风格: 我会先识别即将起来的赛道(光子学、存储、无人机),然后沿着整条供应链去做多。 当然,我也不是每次都对。 $AVAV 和无人机板块是我今年除 $RDDT 外亏得最多的(不过 $OSS 最后涨了 60%+)。 我仍然从基本面上相信像 $AIRO、$LPTH 等公司长期都非常扎实。($AIRO 现在仍然涨了大约 15%,但它曾经 70%+ 的涨幅大部分都没了,Draganfly 跌得更多。) 而且光看 $SNDK 这种超级周期,就会产生一种非常不现实的预期,觉得每个月都能涨 100%。 我在那个板块里识别的主要催化,是委内瑞拉入侵带来的隐蔽无人机 + 前沿防御合同 / 分包商需求。 我也预期后续会有资金继续流入这个板块。 不过,在格陵兰协议那一段,我提过自己已经开始降风险了(大多数防务承包商都跌了),但我还是保留了像 $AVAV 这种较小仓位。 SCAR 项目输给其他公司,比如 $AVAV,这也是个更大的意外,我亏得更多。 不幸的是,伊朗战争这次主要冲击的是像 L3 Harris、$NOC 这种更大的防务承包商,以及像 Anduril 这样的私营公司,还有一些定向能供应商,比如 $LASR。 所以无人机公司并没有多少顺风修复。 尽管如此,我确实知道怎么止损。 但我还是经常被人喷,说“看你今年早些时候喜欢过的 X 股票”。 在这件事上我很透明:$IREN 社区里某些高管,在他们的粉丝因为 $BKKT 或 $ASST 稀释后亏掉 90% 之后,会把所有帖子都删掉。 我挑的多数股票基本面都非常扎实,所以从最初 thesis 出来以后,它们要么守住了自己的价位。 而且我也会把风险等级 / 信念等级一起写出来(风险高的当然下行也更大)。 我比那些只会发热评的人更有 skin in the game。 所以如果我的 thesis 错了,我自己也会亏钱(这种例子还有很多,像 $AVAV 这种就是无穷无尽的亏损)。 但我会把所有东西都留着,让你们自己看事情最后怎么演变。

英文原文

If you don't know my style by now: I identify upcoming sectors (photonics, memory, drones), then go long on the entire supply chain. I'm not always right, though. $AVAV and the drone sectors were my biggest losses this year outside of $RDDT ( $OSS did end up 60%+ ). I still believe fundamentally companies like $AIRO, $LPTH and others are extremely solid long term. ( $AIRO is still up ~15%, but lost majority of it's 70%+ gains, Draganfly dropped way more) And there's very unrealistic expectations from looking at $SNDK supercycles that everything can go up 100% a month. The main catalyst I've identified around that sector was the Venezuela invasion's usage of hidden drone + edge defense contracts/subcontractors. And I expected there to be follow-up funding into the sector. However, I mentioned I de-risked around the Greenland deal (majority of defense contractors crashed) but kept smaller concentration in stuff like $AVAV. SCAR program loss to others like $AVAV was even a bigger surprise and I lost even more. Unfortunately, the War in Iran focused around larger defense contractors like L3 Harris, $NOC and private companies like Anduril, and some energy directed suppliers like $LASR. So there weren't many tailwind recoveries for drone companies. That being said, I do know how to cut losses. But I still get a lot of crap saying oh look at "X stock they've liked earlier in the year". I'm very transparent when it comes to these things: A certain executive in the $IREN community are known to delete all their posts after their followers lose 90% on $BKKT or $ASST post-dilution. Majority of my stocks I identify are extremely solid fundamentally so they either hold their level since my original thesis. And I post risk-levels / conviction-levels with them too (risky ones obviously have more downside). I have skin in the game compared to others that just post hot takes. So if my thesis is wrong, I lose money personally (there's ton of more fills like this, just endless losses on $AVAV). But I leave everything up so you can see how things play out.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗