$MARA

提及 19 首次 2025-07-02 最近 2025-11-24

相关推文

按时间倒序

  1. Nebius因AI投资组合及核心业务高增长被严重低估,有望成下一个GOOGL。

    Nebius [ $NBIS ] 是目前被低估程度最高的成长型公司。它有望成为下一个市值达 210 亿美元的 $GOOGL。原因很简单:其投资组合公司令人惊叹。最极端的例子是 $FTX。回顾 $META 如何成长为万亿级巨头,不仅靠 Facebook,更靠 Instagram、Whatsapp 等投资组合公司主导了社交媒体格局。$FTX 在数字资产和前沿技术领域做了类似布局。2021 年,$FTX 投入 58 亿美元,重仓三家核心公司:1. Anthropic(13.56%,估值 25 亿);2. Robinhood [ $HOOD ](7.6%,估值 85.4 亿);3. Solana [ $SOL ](4100 万+代币)。如今,Anthropic 最新估值 3500 亿,该持股价值约 474 亿;Robinhood 市值超 1000 亿,持股价值约 76 亿;Solana 代币 131.5 美元,持股价值超 57 亿。仅这三家公司四年增值超 550 亿,还不包括 FTX 其他数十亿投资及 Chime、Layerzero、Aptos、Hidden Road(被 $COIN 收购)等。其投资组合价值超越了核心业务(试想若核心业务如 $GOOGL 搜索般增长该多好)。$NBIS 现在拥有与 $FTX(加密)、$META(社交)相同的结构,但在人工智能领域,且核心业务真实且快速增长。Nebius 持有:1. Clickhouse(28%,估值约 70 亿,2025H1 营收 6.3 亿);2. Avride(83%,估值约 60 亿,Uber 领投后);3. Toloka AI(~65%,估值约 6.4 亿);4. TripleTen(100%,估值约 3 亿)。Clickhouse 服务于 Anthropic、$META、$TSLA、$NET 等;Avride 是自动驾驶出租车公司,$UBER 投资 3.75 亿以竞争 Waymo;Toloka 是 AI 标注平台,被 Amazon、Microsoft 等使用。投资组合估值合计 76 亿,增速快于多数公开成长股。而其核心业务同比增长 700%+,ARR 达 70-90 亿,现金 48 亿,服务于 $META、$MSFT 等。这可能是其被纳入 MSCI 指数前最后一个月低于 90 美元的机会,将获数亿至十亿流入。相比 $IREN 或 $CIFR,$NBIS 是唯一拥有此类投资组合的数据中心成长股。$NBIS 仅估值 210 亿,市场正在忽视这一机会。

    英文原文

    Nebius [ $NBIS ] is the most undervalued growth company right now. And it has the potential to become the next $GOOGL at a $21B market cap. There's one simple reason: It's portfolio companies are mindblowing. The most incredible example on this concept is the company $FTX. Here's the story: When we look at how $META grew into a $1T+ company, it wasn't just Facebook. It was their portfolio companies Instagram, Whatsapp, and others made Meta dominate the social media landscape. $FTX was doing something similar, but in digital assets and frontier technologies. Four years ago, in 2021, $FTX invested $5.8B into a large basket of assets. And put a large chunk into these three core companies: 1. Anthropic, 13.56% at a $2.5 Billion valuation. 2. Robinhood [ $HOOD ] 7.6% at a $8.54B valuation 3. Solana [ $SOL ], 41M+ tokens. Fast forward to today, that would have been: · Anthropic in it's latest round is worth $350B. That stake would have been worth ~$47.4B. · Robinhood is now worth over $100B. That stake would be worth ~$7.6B. · Solana is now worth $131.5 per token, making the stake well over $5.7B. Those three companies alone generated well over $55B+ in value in 4 years time, and this is not even including FTX's tens of billions of dollars + hundreds of other investments + holdings in Chime, Layerzero, Aptos, Hidden Road (bought by $COIN), and crypto. Their portfolio companies outlasted their core business (and imagine, how much it would have been worth if the core business kept scaling like $GOOGL search did alongside Youtube). $NBIS now has the same setup as $FTX did in crypto, $META in social media, but in artificial intelligence with a legitimate and incredibly rapidly growing core business. Nebius owns: 1. Clickhouse, 28% at a ~$7B valuation ($6.3 H1 2025) 2. Avride, 83% at a ~$6B valuation. (post Uber raise) 3. Toloka AI, ~65% at a ~$640 million valuation 4. TripleTen, 100% at a ~$300m valuation. · Clickhouse powers Anthropic, $META, $TSLA, $NET, and many fortune 500 companies. · Avride is a self-driving car robotaxi company, spun out of Yandex that $UBER invested in a $375M round in to compete with Waymo. · Toloka is a AI labeling platform that Amazon, Microsoft, Anthropic, and Shopify uses. $1.96B + $4.96B + $416M + $300m = $7.6B valuation in portfolio companies that are growing faster than most public growth companies. But if we look at their core business that is scaling to 700%+ Y/Y to $7-9B ARR, with $4.8B in cash, powering $META, $MSFT, Cursor, governments, and many more... This might be the last month it's under $90 before it receives hundreds of millions to low billions of extra inflows from MSCI inclusion today. There's no other datacenter growth company that has this type of portfolio if we look at crowd favorites like $IREN or $CIFR. $NBIS is only valued at $21B and the market is sleeping on this opportunity.

  2. 基于财报与宏观因素,发布Neocloud板块个股梯队排名及评估框架。

    Neocloud(新云)板块梯队排名。 Q3财报后+市场板块回调: [S] 级:$NBIS [A] 级:$CIFR, $WULF, $IREN [B] 级:$GLXY, $CORZ [C] 级:$APLD, $CLSK [D] 级:$WLAC, $DGDX, $WYFI [F] 级:$CRWV*, $SLNH [U] 级:$GRRR, $MARA, $DGDX, $CLSK, $BITF, $HIVE, $RIOT ** 从左到右依次排名。 *:短期价格下跌创造了诱人的入场点(例如 $CRWV),但中期(12个月)吸引力仍然有限。 **:不确定,决定不评级(但在梯队图中列为F级)。一些纯矿企尚未完全转型为HPC(高性能计算)+ 合同不确定性太大。 很多人询问财报后的更新,这些只是基于以下加权评估的个人想法: a. 合同可见性和收入确定性 b. 对宏观收紧和信贷条件的韧性 c. 资产负债表强度和利润率概况 d. HPC建设风险(产能执行和编排) e. 收入增长轨迹(1-2年视野) f. 当前市值相对于收入增长和基础设施价值的比率 整个Neocloud板块都很有吸引力,但截至Q3,某些公司的非对称回报显然高于其他公司。

    英文原文

    The Neocloud Sector Tierlist. Post Q3 earnings + Market Sector Drop: [S] Tier: $NBIS [A] Tier: $CIFR, $WULF, $IREN [B] Tier: $GLXY, $CORZ [C] Tier: $APLD, $CLSK [D] Tier: $WLAC, $DGDX, $WYFI [F] Tier, $CRWV*, $SLNH [U] Tier: $GRRR, $MARA, $DGDX, $CLSK, $BITF, $HIVE, $RIOT ** Ranked in order from left to right. * : Short-term pricing drops created compelling entries (e.g., $CRWV), but med-term (12m) attractiveness remains limited. **: Uncertain, decided not to rate them (but put them in tierlist photo as F). Some pure miners haven't fully pivot into HPC yet + too much contract uncertainty. Lot of people asked about updates post earnings, these are just personal thoughts based on weighted assessments of: a. Contract visibility and revenue certainty b. Resilience to macro tightening and credit conditions c. Balance sheet strength and margin profile d. HPC buildout risk (capacity execution and orchestration) e. Revenue growth trajectory (1–2 year horizon) f. Current market capitalization relative to revenue ramp and infrastructure value The whole Neocloud sector is compelling but some have clearly higher asymmetrical return over others as of Q3.

  3. 对比加密控股公司,建议直接持有资产,视MSTR为例外。

    如果观察灰度投资(Grayscale Investments)等历史模式——在ETF出现前,这是通过控股公司获取加密货币敞口的方式——它们曾长期大幅折价于净资产值(NAV)交易。 对于许多像 $BMNR 这样的公司,直接持有底层 $ETH 资产是更好的选择。对于 $MARA,则是持有 $BTC 以及挖矿业务,并可能向高性能计算(HPC)转型的混合体。 我认为 $MSTR 是控股公司的例外,这归因于其积累的巨额 $BTC,以及美国政府将其国有化以获取比特币敞口的潜在可能性。

    英文原文

    If you look at historical patterns such as grayscale investments, which was the way to get crypto exposure from holding companies pre-ETF, they traded way under-NAV for the longest time. With many companies like $BMNR, you’re better off holding the underlying $ETH asset. With $MARA it’s a mix of holding $BTC as well as the mining business + optionally to transition to HPC. I would only argue $MSTR is an exception to holding companies due to how much $BTC they’ve accumulated and the potential for nationalization for the US government to get exposure to Bitcoin.

  4. 澄清对IREN的立场,指出其实际利润率低于宣传值,强调权衡取舍。

    另外,当我发布关于 $IREN 和 $NBIS 的对比,或谈论 $IREN 拥有与 $RIOT 和 $MARA 相当的能力,并指出规模化后的利润率比算力更重要时,我并非看空 IREN,只是陈述现实情况。 同样,当人们声称他们拥有 92% 的毛利率时,如果你计入折旧和其他费用,事实并非如此。他们只是进入了另一个类别,如果你按照其他高性能计算(HPC)公司核算毛利率的方式进行标准化处理,利润率会低得多。 但这并不意味着情况糟糕,总是存在权衡取舍。

    英文原文

    Also when I post about comparisons between $IREN and $NBIS or talking about $IREN having comparable capacity to $RIOT and $MARA, and saying margins at scale matter more than compute, I'm not bearish on IREN, just giving the reality of the situation. Same when people try claiming they have 92% gross margins, they don't when yo factor in deprecation and other expenses. They just went into another category and if you normalize it with how other HPC companies do accounting for their gross margins, margins are a lot less. But that doesn't mean it's bad, there's always tradeoffs.

  5. 对比IREN与MARA/RIOT产能,质疑灵活性溢价是否合理

    情况很微妙,但你确实可以将产能和管道与 $IREN、$RIOT、$MARA 进行比较,因为产能本身是不变的。主要区别在于灵活性(Optionality,即公司在需求变化时重新配置产能的能力)。如果你认为 $IREN 的定位更好,那当然可以。关于 $MARA,你提到了基于集装箱的 ASIC 矿场作为例子。然而,它们仍然可以改造为高性能计算(HPC),只是成本稍高。正如你所说,$IREN 拥有设计建造的数据中心,配备架空地板、光纤互连、HVAC/液冷系统,因此非常适合 HPC。转型有不同的层级,但在转型过程中产能保持不变。我想表达的观点是,这是一个涉及利润率等多方面的复杂问题。你不能简单地说 X 产能 = X 收入/市值,否则你可以轻易指出 $MARA 和 $RIOT 拥有与 $IREN 相似的产能。至于这种灵活性是否值 100 亿美元的差价,我不确定。

    英文原文

    It's nuanced, but you can definitely compare capacity and pipeline with $IREN, $RIOT, $MARA, since capacity doesn't change. The main difference is optionality (how well a company can repurpose capacity as demand shifts). If you were to argue $IREN is better positioned, sure. With $MARA, you mentioned container-based ASIC farms as an example. However, they can still be retrofitted to HPC, it's just slightly more costly. $IREN as you mentioned, designed built data centers with raised floors, fiber interconnects, HVAC/liquid cooling. so it does well for HPC. There's different levels to pivots, but capacity remains the same through pivots. The point I was making was that it's multifaceted with margins, and everything else. You can't just say X Capacity = X revenue/Marketcap , otherwise you can easily just point to $MARA and $RIOT with similar capacities with $IREN. But whether or not optionality is worth a 10B difference, I don't know.

  6. 对比IREN与矿企估值,指出HPC转型执行风险及高估值隐忧。

    关于 $IREN,人们不断提出论点:~3 GW 产能对应 ~170 亿美元市值,理应值 X 市值。 $RIOT 也有类似产能:1GW Corsicana,700MW Rockdale,加上其他,总计 ~3GW 产能(BTC 挖矿 + 管道项目合计)。~70 亿美元市值。 $MARA 也有 1.7GW,加上 3+ GW 管道项目。~67 亿美元市值。 $IREN 确实相比其他两家转向了高性能计算(HPC),但我们肯定已经看到 480%+ 的涨幅已将其定价。 公允的观点是,H.C. Wainwright 的分析师表示“IREN AI 云业务已达到非理性繁荣的程度”。 此前我们仅关注产能,但市场将开始对利润率(execution risk)和执行风险进行定价。 取决于你的判断:你认为 $IREN 能否像 $CRWV 花费数年数十亿美元那样执行并扩展至 HPC?或者当 $ORCL 这样 7500 亿美元的超大规模云厂商以 14% 毛利率都未能做到时,他们能否做到? 此外,如果那么容易,Riot 和 Mara 及其他高 GW 产能矿企早就全面转向 HPC 并达到类似的市值重估了。 这是人们不喜欢谈论的下行风险。然而,上行空间在于你提到的产能/基础设施 = 更高的收入潜力。

    英文原文

    With $IREN people keep making the argument about ~3 GW capacity at a ~17B marketcap, deserves to be X marketcap. $RIOT has a similar capacity too: 1GW Corsicana, 700MW Rockdale, and misc with ~3GW capacity (total if you combine BTC mining + pipeline). ~7B marketcap $MARA also has 1.7GW with 3+ GW pipeline as well. ~6.7B marketcap $IREN did make the HPC pivot compared to the other two but we've definitely seen that priced in with the 480%+ runup. Fair note is that analysts from H.C. Wainright have said "IREN AI cloud business has reached a point of irrational exuberance." Before, we looked solely at capacity, but markets will start pricing in margins and execution risk. It's up to your decision whether you think $IREN can execute and scale into HPC like $CRWV spent years and billions doing. Or if they can do so when $ORCL, a 750B hyperscaler failed to do so with 14% gross margins. Also if it were that easy Riot and Mara and other high GW capacity miners would have just full-sent HPC and would reach similar marketcap re-ratings too. That's the downside risk people don't like talking about. However, upside is that capacity/infrastructure = higher revenue potential that you mentioned.

  7. 展示Neocloud板块个股一个月涨幅,重申看好并集中持仓NBIS。

    Neocloud(新云)的投资逻辑经受住了时间的考验。 一个月后: $CRWV 120.34 → 135.64 (+12.7%) $NBIS 107.70 → 126.49 (+17.5%) $WULF 10.63 → 13.69 (+28.8%) $IREN 41.68 → 64.69 (+55.2%) $CIFR 11.47 → 20.70 (+80.4%) $BITF 2.54 → 4.51 (+77.6%) $WYFI 22.83 → 36.52 (+59.9%) $GRRR 19.90 → 16.95 (−14.8%) $SLNH 2.75 → 2.81 (+2.2%) $RIOT 17.69 → 23.01 (+30.1%) $MARA 16.13 → 19.61 (+21.6%) $CLSK 12.96 → 20.21 (+56.0%) $HUT 33.16 → 49.95 (+50.6%) 这仅仅是史上最大规模AI数据中心建设浪潮的开始,金融圈(X)上的所有人现在入场都还为时过早。 我对整个Neocloud板块非常看好,但个人因$NBIS具有最高的非对称回报潜力而集中持仓。

    英文原文

    The Neocloud thesis aged well. 1 month later: $CRWV 120.34 → 135.64 (+12.7%) $NBIS 107.70 → 126.49 (+17.5%) $WULF 10.63 → 13.69 (+28.8%) $IREN 41.68 → 64.69 (+55.2%) $CIFR 11.47 → 20.70 (+80.4%) $BITF 2.54 → 4.51 (+77.6%) $WYFI 22.83 → 36.52 (+59.9%) $GRRR 19.90 → 16.95 (−14.8%) $SLNH 2.75 → 2.81 (+2.2%) $RIOT 17.69 → 23.01 (+30.1%) $MARA 16.13 → 19.61 (+21.6%) $CLSK 12.96 → 20.21 (+56.0%) $HUT 33.16 → 49.95 (+50.6%) This is only the beginning of the largest AI data center buildout in history and everyone on finx is still early. I'm very bullish on the Neocloud sector across the board, but personally have concentration in $NBIS due to the highest asymmetrical return.

  8. 作者通过分部估值法论证 $NBIS 当前被低估,预计一年内市值可达 1000 亿美元。

    为什么我认为 $NBIS 在一年内可以轻松达到约 400 美元/股或 1000 亿美元+市值: 目前,Nebius 的估值为 240 亿美元(增至 1000 亿美元需增长 316%+)。 假设 2026-2027 年零增长: 核心业务:310 亿–365 亿美元 分部估值求和(Sum of Parts):71 亿美元(打 6 折) 中值估值 = 390 亿美元估值(+62.5%) 这尚未计入任何增长,而增长可能将其推升至 1000 亿美元。 今天,投资者实际上仅为核心业务支付了 130 亿美元,而其正以 1000% 的同比增长率增长——从季度营收 1 亿美元增至 13 亿美元,毛利率为 60-70%。 市场通常是前瞻性的,但对于 Nebius,它只盯着脚下。这些只是非正式的想法和简短分析。 业务估值: __________________ 当前现金等价物(扣除 42 亿美元后)~ 58.8 亿美元 投资组合公司:~ 26.8 亿美元 Clickhouse(28%,估值 63.5 亿美元),Avride(17%,估值 ~31 亿美元),Toloka(51%,估值 ~7.2 亿美元)- Avride/Toloka 为投机性估算。也未考虑 Clickhouse 更新的估值(可能已增长)。 实物资产:~ 20 亿美元中值 GPU(~7.5-10 亿美元),服务器,网络(4-6 亿美元),土地/建筑(3-5 亿美元),电力/冷却(2-3 亿美元)。总实物资产介于 16.5-24 亿美元之间。 保守的分部估值求和:~ 105.8 亿美元(截至今天,未考虑投资组合公司升值)。Nebius 已通过票据转换消除了大部分债务。 通常拥有投资组合的公司不会以 1:1 的净资产值(NAV)交易,因此我在计算时砍掉了 105.8 亿美元的 40%,考虑到这主要是现金,这是保守的。 _ 无增长基准情景 现在进入核心业务: FY 2026-2027 预估:2025 财年预计 11 亿美元 + 来自 $MSFT 的 38 亿美元(合同/5)(显然可能存在收入滞后,因此平均分布在 2026-2027 年)。 如果 Nebius 完全停止基于 2025 年预测的增长,他们在 2026/2027 年的最低年化经常性收入(ARR) 将达到 49.8 亿美元。 毛利率目前约为 71.2%(上一季度),但可能在 60-70% 之间 + 管理层目标 30% 息税折旧摊销前利润(EBITDA)。 以下是核心业务在增长完全停止时的计算: 企业价值/收入(EV/Revenue) 6–8 倍:312 亿 | 416 亿美元 企业价值/息税折旧摊销前利润(EV/EBITDA) 15–25 倍:234 亿 | 390 亿美元 前瞻性的基准/悲观情景企业价值 = 310–420 亿美元(基于收入)或 230–390 亿美元(基于 EBITDA) (核心业务)+ 分部估值求和 = 335.8 亿美元中值无增长情景 + ~105.8 * 0.6 = ~390 亿美元。 接下来我们将考虑如果 Nebius 增长的情况。 __________________ 有增长情景: 以下是仅基于核心业务如何达到 1000 亿美元。 $NBIS 拥有约 50 亿美元已确认 ARR。 Nebius 唯一需要的是 ARR 增长至 80-120 亿美元: 再签 1 个超大规模云厂商(hyperscaler)交易 + SMB 扩张。 只要达成 GCP 或 Meta 交易,我们就能达到该目标。(这只是高层面的,不深入 GPU 折旧争论、电力增加、执行风险等)。我对一年内达成另一个超大规模云厂商交易持乐观态度,因为更多 Mag7 最近签署了交易(例如 Meta 与 $CRWV 的 140 亿美元交易)。 此外,其他一切保持不变:毛利率 ≥60–70% 和 EBITDA 目标:~30%。好消息是,通过白皮书,我们也可能看到 Nebius 的利润率扩张。 NBIS 在昨天的白皮书中声称接近 100% 的 GPU 利用率,这将证明比 $CRWV 或任何矿工转型(+ NBIS 没有有毒利息债务,且客户群更多元化)更高的利润率和每 GPU 收入是合理的。 他们的软件编排本身就是一个护城河,并非所有新云(neoclouds)或比特币矿工转型都能维持同样的高毛利率。 乐意争论为什么全栈、利润率、与 SMB 的客户多元化很重要(如果你想比较 $IREN 的 GW 容量或其他人)-> 只需看看 $ORCL 在建设上损失 1 亿美元+。 无论如何,由于运营支出(opex)成本 + 利润率 + 全栈 + 客户群,我对 $NBIS 的看法优于其他任何新云。(如果有任何遗漏或计算错误,请告诉我,也欢迎辩论) 但除此之外,当前 230 亿美元市值是一场清仓大甩卖,没有计入增长,而它今天本应估值 390 亿美元。然后还有 1 个超大规模云厂商交易带来的上行空间,一年内在 1000 亿美元市值下获得 4 倍回报。

    英文原文

    Why I think $NBIS can easily hit ~$400/share or $100B+ market cap in 1 year: Right now, Nebius trades at a $24B valuation (316%+ increase to $100B). If we pretend that there's 0 growth in 2026-2027: Core Business: $31B–$36.5B Sum of Parts: $7.1B (40% slashed) Midpoint Valuation = $39B valuation (+62.5%) This is before factoring in any growth, which could scale it up to $100B. Today, investors are effectively paying $13B for the core business today, which is on track to grow 1,000% YoY-from $100M in quarterly revenue to $1.3B , with 60-70% gross margins. Markets are usually forward looking, but for Nebius, it only looks at the ground. These are just informal thoughts and a small writeup. Business Valuation: __________________ Current cash equivalents (post $4.2B) ~ $5.88B Portfolio Companies: ~$2.68B Clickhouse (28%, $6.35B valuation), Avride (17%, ~$3.1B valuation), Toloka (51%, ~720M valuation) - speculative estimates on Avride/Toloka. Also did not consider Clickhouse updated valuation, which likely grew). Physical Assets: ~$2B midpoint GPUs (~750m-1B), Servers, networking ($400-600m), Land/buildings ($300m-$500m), power/cooling ($200-$300m). Total phyiscal assets sitting between $1.65B-$2.4B Conservative Sum of parts: ~$10.58B (As of today, not considering portfolio companies going up). Nebius has eliminated most debt from the note conversion. Typically companies with portfolios never trade 1:1 with NAV, so I just slashed 40% off 10.58B or so when doing calculations which is conservative considering it's mostly cash. _ BASE CASE WITH NO GROWTH Now going into the core business: FY 2026-2027 EST: $1.1B projected FY 2025, + $3.8B from $MSFT (contract / 5) (obviously maybe revenue lag, which is why it's on avg 2026-2027 anyway). If Nebius stopped growing completely off their 2025 projections, they would do $4.98B minimum ARR in 2026/2027. Gross margins are sitting at ~71.2% (from last quarter), but likely between 60-70% + management aiming 30% EBITDA. These calculations from the core business are if growth stopped completely: EV/Revenue 6–8×: $31.2B | 41.6B EV/EBITDA 15–25×: $23.4B | $39B Forward-looking EV on the base/bear case = $31–42B (revenue) or $23–39B (EBITDA) (Core Business) + Sum of Parts = $33.58B midpoint no growth case + ~$10.58 * .6 = ~$39B. And now we'll consider that next if Nebius grows. __________________ CASE WITH GROWTH: Now here's how we get to $100B just based on core business. $NBIS has ~$5B ARR confirmed. Only thing Nebius needs is ARR growth to $8–12B: 1 more hyperscaler deal + SMB expansion. All it takes is a GCP or Meta deal and we hit that target. (This is just high-level, not going into GPU depreciation arguments, increasing power, execution risk, etc). And I'm bullish on the chances of another hyperscaler deal happening in 1 year time when more Mag7 signed deals recently (eg Meta $14B with CRWV). Also everything else would need to stay the same gross margin: ≥60–70% and EBITDA target: ~30%. On the bright side, with the whitepaper, we've also likely seen expanding margins with Nebius. NBIS is claiming near-100% realized GPU utilization through their whitepaper yesterday, which would justify higher margins and higher revenue per GPU compared to $CRWV or any miner pivot (+ NBIS has no no-toxic interest debt, and a more diversified client base). Their software orchestration is a moat in and of itself and not all neoclouds or bitcoin miner pivots can sustain the same high-gross margins. Happy to argue why full stack, margins, customer diversification with SMBs are important (if you want to compare $IREN GW capacity, or others) -> just look at $ORCL losing $100m+ on buildout. Regardless, I'm bullish on $NBIS over every other possible Neocloud because of opex costs + margins + fullstack + client base. (Feel free to let me know if I missed anything or calculated wrong, also open to debate) But that aside, current $23B marketcap is a firesale that does not price in growth when it should be valued at $39B today. Then there's the upside on 1 more hyperscaler deal though for 4x return in 1 year at a $100B MC .

  9. 博主发布降息周交易清单,强烈看好TSM及Neocloud板块,建议做多。

    10月20日,重要的降息交易周。 个人想法和解释: 🛝 = 波段交易(Swing Trade) 🐈 = 催化剂交易(Catalyst Trade) 🎇 = 2026年交易,已进行税务收割(Tax Harvested) 清仓卖出(Fire Sale) 🔥 $NBIS 强烈买入(Strong Buy) $TSM $AMKR $WLAC $AMZN $LTC 🐈 $RDDT $HIMS 🛝 $IBIT $ALAB $CRDO $SMCI $FLY 🎇 $SNAP 🎇 $ETOR 🎇 $LULU 🎇 买入(Buy) $AMD $HOOD $RBRK $UNH $TGT 🐈 $IREN 🐈 $WYFI $WULF $CIFR $SLNH $BITF $GLXY $FLNC $MU (跳过“持有”,因为我过去提到的其他股票,既然没有变化,大概就继续持有)。 卖出(Sell) $ETH $BMNR $PL $BLSKY $RGTI $OKLO $IONQ $QBTS _ 宏观方面,距离降息(约97%概率)还有9天。市场处于恐惧模式。这是建立多头头寸且不减仓的理想时机。 清仓卖出 _ $NBIS - 无需多言,我仍维持2026年牛市情景下$400的目标价,基于40-60亿美元+的前瞻性收入及约60-75%的毛利率,以及另一份可能的超大规模云厂商合同(如 $META)。 周五下跌10%+是机械式对冲和做市商(MM)钉住价格所致。尽管波动剧烈,价格仍卡在$113.5。预计周一空头对冲将平仓(鉴于做市商买入看跌期权并做空看涨期权 -> 临近到期时大量做空),价格将回升。我在下跌时买入六位数的看涨期权,因为基本面没有实质性变化。 强烈买入 TSM - 天哪,请务必将其纳入投资组合。这是一台印钞机,每年营收增长38-40%的同时毛利率还在提升,简直不可思议。财报大超预期后股价回调,这是我生命中最容易的多头机会之一。 AMKR - 我尚未持有,但计划因TSM在亚利桑那州的参与以及其作为美国供应链大伙伴的潜力而加仓(随着美国推动TSM向美国晶圆厂+制造转移)。 WLAC - Neocloud SPAC IPO,上行空间巨大。我最近常提到这个,它可能是估值最好的Neocloud之一,且已有不错的利润率(并非来自矿工转型,后者不确定性稍大)。他们与Fluidstack合作,我预计若获得Mag7合同,估值将重估500%+。 AMZN - $213太离谱了哈哈。我不明白在牛市中它为何年初至今下跌-3%。 LTC - 受加密货币清算和政府停摆延迟ETF影响。现在是买入并等待ETF获批的好时机。 RDDT - 跌至$190是很好的回调。我以为$200是底部,结果跌得更低。关于ChatGPT较少引用它的新闻引发了大幅抛售,我认为这影响甚微。 HIMS - CEO减持导致下跌14%+。所有者经常卖股,对公司基本面影响不大,仅影响短期情绪。预计会反弹。 IBIT - 比特币$108k是很好的入场点,它已在$110k-$120k之间震荡一段时间,低于此价位通常很好。 ALAB - 上次我说过,因新竞争对手新闻而抛售过度。它已在市场上与AVGO竞争哈哈,拥有类似NVDA的利润率,同比增长数百%,Mag7在数据中心建设中正在使用它。 CRDO - 逻辑与ALAB类似,随Astera抛售但幅度稍小。 SMCI - 应因明年55%+的营收增长而重估。我早先怀疑这些预测,但随着数据中心增长,看起来变得现实了。 FLY - 这是中程有效载荷的博弈。人们怀疑Fly的执行能力,但NOC联合开发中程载荷消除了很多风险(并在与Falcon9竞争时可能重估500%+)。 SNAP - 我在早期的深度研究(DD)帖子中计算过Snap记忆功能的变现能力,目前完全未定价。它季度营收$13亿+,市值仅$130亿哈哈,通过增加营收+降低Google OPEX成本获得的自由现金流(FCF)非常惊人。 ETOR - 大部分为现金,以IBKR的速度增长,受税务收割影响。 LULU - 受税务收割+Alo、Vuori等竞争影响。但季节性应该不错,且现在市盈率极低。 买入 AMD - ChatGPT下AMD订单,ORCL建设AMD数据中心。随着成为$NVDA潜在竞争对手,预计明年将重估。仍认为Nvidia将主导,但鉴于其4.5T市值,即使AMD只占一小部分份额,也有很大追赶空间。 HOOD - 10%+回调后看起来好多了。可能复刻PLTR的走势。 RBRK - 之前做过深度研究,作为网络安全公司,在下跌中看起来更好,该领域倍数极低。只需削减营销,客户粘性高。 UNH - 美国医疗很烂但不会消失。认为Warren等人知道这一点。 TGT 🐈 - 下月分红,大股息股票。我认为现在是大量建仓的好时机。 IREN 🐈 - 巨大的GW,预计获得Mag7或类似交易。 WYFI - 任何Neocloud都是买入(例如见关于Mag7将收入导向这些小型10亿-50亿公司的论点)。 WULF - Neocloud博弈 CIFR - Neocloud博弈 SLNH - Neocloud博弈 BITF - Neocloud博弈 GLXY - Neocloud衍生品博弈 FLNC - Neocloud能源博弈 MU - 中国风险解除,内存在那里有巨大市场,内存也可能在数据中心建设中重估。 _ 卖出 ETH - 不喜欢$4k+的以太坊 BMNR - 如果我不喜欢这些水平的以太坊,持有国库公司也没意义 PL - 低营收,太空股(极高估值) BLSKY - 低营收,太空股(极高估值) RGTI - 量子泡沫 OKLO - 核能泡沫 IONQ - 量子泡沫 QBTS - 量子泡沫 _ 快速宏观提示: -> 9天后降息,概率~97%。预期抢跑,做多。就这些。

    英文原文

    October 20th, Important Rate Cut Trading Week. Personal thoughts and explanations: 🛝 = Swing Trade 🐈 = Catalyst Trade 🎇 = 2026 Trade, Tax Harvested Fire Sale 🔥 $NBIS Strong Buy $TSM $AMKR $WLAC $AMZN $LTC 🐈 $RDDT $HIMS 🛝 $IBIT $ALAB $CRDO $SMCI $FLY 🎇 $SNAP 🎇 $ETOR 🎇 $LULU 🎇 Buy $AMD $HOOD $RBRK $UNH $TGT 🐈 $IREN 🐈 $WYFI $WULF $CIFR $SLNH $BITF $GLXY $FLNC $MU (Skipping Hold, since any other stock I've mentioned in the past, it probably just hold it since nothing's changed). Sell $ETH $BMNR $PL $BLSKY $RGTI $OKLO $IONQ $QBTS _ So macro wise, we are 9 days away from (~97% or so rate cut). Market is in fear mode. This is the ideal time to go long and not cut positions. Fire Sale _ $NBIS - Needs no explanation, I still maintain $400 PT on a bull case 2026 due to 4-6B+ forward revenue off ~60-75% gross margins, and another likely hyperscaler contract (eg. $META) What happened on the 10%+ drop on Friday was mechanical hedging and MM Pinning. You can see this with the price stuck at $113.5, despite any volatility. I'd expect short hedges to unwind Monday (given MMs bought puts and were short calls -> heavy short into expiration) and price to go back up. I ended up buying 6 figures worth of calls on the drop as there was no material changes. Strong Buy TSM - Holy crap, please have this in your portfolio. This is a money printer, and scaling your revenue by 38-40% every year WHILE increasing gross margins is just insane. It dipped as well after smashing earnings so it's one of the easiest longs in my life. AMKR - I don't have this in my portfolio yet but will be looking to add due to TSM's involvement in Arizona and potential to be a big partner in the US supply chain (as America tries to push TSM toward US fab + manufacturing). WLAC - Neocloud SPAC IPO, large upside. I talk about this a lot recently, but it's probably one of the best valued Neoclouds out there, and already has great profit margins (not a pivot from miners, where it's a bit more uncertain). They work with Fluidstack, and I'd expect a 500%+ re-rating on top of a Mag7 contract. AMZN - $213 is insane lol. I have no clue how this is down -3% YTD during a bull market. LTC - Affected by crypto liquidations and government shutdown delaying ETFs. Great time to buy and just wait for ETF to be approved. RDDT - Great dip to $190. I thought $200 would be a bottom but ended up going lower. The news about ChatGPT citing it less caused a large sell-off which I think was very immaterial. HIMS - 14%+ drop off CEO share sale. Owners sell shares all the time, it doesn't really affect the fundamentals of the company much, just short term sentiment. I'd expect it to rebound. IBIT - Bitcoin $108k great entry point, it's been swinging between $110k - $120k for awhile so anything under is usually great. ALAB - I said this last time but it sold off way too much from news of a new competitor. It's already competing vs AVGO in the market lol, NVDA-like margins, growing hundreds of percent Y/Y, Mag7 using them in data center buildout. CRDO - Similar thesis to ALAB, sold off alongside Astera but a bit less. SMCI - Should get re-rated for 55%+ or so revenue growth into next year. I doubted the projections earlier but with the data center growth, it's looking realistic. FLY - This was a medium lift payload play. People doubt fly's execution but NOC co-developing medium lift takes a lot of risk off the table (and possible re-rating it 500%+ when it competes vs falcon9) SNAP - Did the math on Snap monetization of memories in an earlier DD post and it's completely not priced in yet. It's doing $1.3B+ quarterly revenue on a $13B market cap lol, and the amount FCF they would get from increasing their revenue + lowering Google OPEX costs is insane. ETOR - Majority cash, growing at IBKR rates, suffering from tax harvesting LULU - Suffering from tax harvesting + competition from Alo, Vuori, etc. But seasonally should be good, and extremely low p/e now. Buy AMD - ChatGPT putting in AMD orders, ORCL building out AMD data centers. Likely going to get a re-rating in the next year as a potential $NVDA competitor. Still think Nvidia will dominate but with it's 4.5T marketcap, AMD has a lot to catch up on even if it takes a small percent share. HOOD - Looking at a lot better after the 10%+ correction. Could pull a PLTR RBRK - Did DD on this earlier, looks better on the drop as a cybersecurity company really low multiples in the space. Just needs to cut back on marketing, customers sticky. UNH - Healthcare is sht in America but not going anywhere. Think Warren and the others know this TGT 🐈 - Dividend next moth, big dividend stock. Around now is a good time to load up IMO IREN 🐈 - Huge GW, expect mag7 or similar deal. WYFI - Any neocloud is a buy (eg. see thesis on mag7 funneling revenue down toward these small 1B-5B companies) WULF - neocloud play CIFR - neocloud play SLNH - neocloud play BITF - neocloud play GLXY - neocloud derivative play FLNC - neocloud energy play MU - China derisked, memory had a huge market there, memory also likely going to get re-rating in tdata center buildout _ Sell ETH - Not a fan of Ethereum at $4k+ BMNR - If I don't like Ethereum at these levels, no point of holding treasury companies PL - Low revenue, space stock (extremely high valuation) BLSKY -Low revenue, space stock (extremely high valuation) RGTI - Quantum bubble OKLO - Nuclear bubble IONQ -Quantum bubble QBTS - Quantum bubble _ Quick macro heads up: -> Rate cut in 9 days ~97% odds. Frontrunning expected, go long. That's all.

  10. 博主基于宏观利好更新美股AI/半导体/能源等板块的强烈买入、买入及持有名单。

    大豆/植物油崩盘,个人思考与解释: 强烈买入 $ALAB $CRDO $NBIS $WLAC $LTC $TSM $BTC (+ 同上次税务收割股) $AMZN $SMCI _ 买入 $AMD $FLNC $SEI $BZAI $NKLR $IREN $WULF $CIFR $CRWV $BITF $WYFI $SLNH $BITF $RBRK $GLXY $GRAB $SEA $META $TGT $SNAP $MU $RKLB $FLY $UNH 持有 $MP $HOOD $EOSE $NVDA $GOOGL $DFLI $SOFI $VIRT $RR $AVGO $BE $ASTS (已达推文股票代码上限,其余同上次帖子,Quantum或Oklo仍建议卖出) _ 强烈买入 ALAB - 数据中心建设的重要组成部分,拥有类似英伟达(NVDA)的利润率,客户包括Mag7。已有来自博通(AVGO)的竞争者,真的不认为Arista会构成竞争威胁。 CRDO - 与ALAB同样的抛售,之前觉得两者都略有高估,但现在回到修正区间,适合补仓。 NBIS - $400目标价牛市情景。宏观顺风来自政府重新开放+10月底降息预期进入财报季,短期前景看好。利好众多(如Meta x CRWV,因此有更多Mag7客户的潜力),分部表现良好,例如Clickhouse,季度收入从$1亿扩展到$15亿+非常惊人。合同已锁定,只是公司执行的问题。 WLAC - 之前在$13时写过投资逻辑。即使在$14.5也很强,因为它可以轻松重估100%+。 LTC - 受杠杆交易者和政府停摆影响。预计停摆将持续一段时间,主要买入理由是ETF获批。但无论如何,低于$100都是很好的买入点,因为最终会获批(~95%概率)。 TSM - 天哪。如果是美国公司这将是$3万亿市值的公司,利润率惊人,对于其规模而言增长率惊人。每篇关于OpenAI X (**Sydney Sweeney合作)或AMD建设/NVDA建设的帖子中,TSM都是核心,即使以历史高点买入,也轻松成为$2万亿+公司(目前约$1.5万亿)。 BTC - $112K是好的入场点。黄金不断创历史新高,基本面没什么变化,只是最近大量清算。 (+ 同上次税务收割股) AMZN - 我真不知道为什么年初至今还在跌。我觉得亚马逊不需要太多解释,但仍在增长(例如AWS积压订单巨大,仍增长24%,当然不如ORCL、GCP等),但考虑到年底季节性和2月前的上涨,现在可能是抄底的最佳时机。AMZN今天触及$213-215是补仓的好机会,因为短期波段交易通常浮动在$218-$227,但长期我预计它会追赶其他Mag7。 SMCI - 被低估。市场关注短期表现,Charles引用的55%+同比前瞻收入增长无人相信+未实现的积压订单。但现在随着所有数据中心建设,这开始说得通了。因此应在接下来两次财报中重估。 _ 买入 AMD - OpenAI x AMD,Oracle使用AMD建设,这么多交易,如果它确实是$NVDA的强劲竞争对手,将重估为潜在$1万亿+公司。我不认为赢家通吃,可以看到$NVDA $4.5万亿+市值和$AMD $3500亿市值,所以我们可以看到大幅拉升(OpenAI通常是前沿模型领导者,如果Sam说他们可以使用AMD芯片+Elon说它对中小模型有益,可能意味着积极信号) FLNC - AI消耗后能源强劲重估,很好的买入。 SEI - AI消耗后能源强劲重估,很好的买入。 BZAI - 别人做过这家公司的深度研究,仅因板块和向边缘计算转移(例如机器人将很热)。由于低市值和类似公司的上涨可能表现良好。 NKLR - 像$OKLO这样的核能股已经起飞,这只是跟随梯队。 IREN - 无需介绍,巨大的GW算力,只是还没有宣布Mag7交易,但随时可能到来 -> 强劲重估。不是强烈买入的唯一原因是因为不完全确信矿工能像CRWV那样转型并保持高利润率(例如$ORCL打击文章),但我们会看到。 WULF - GOOGL积压订单,另外$3.6+亿左右的资金帮助很大。 CIFR - X上有很多关于未来产能和强劲重估的信息。一直喜欢这家公司,因为它是NBIS-lite。你可以买任何Neocloud,因为板块潜力巨大,Mag7将收入注入。 CRWV - 因为债务不像其他人那样喜欢,但由于植物油修正,$134(低于META交易宣布时)是更好的买入点 BITF - Neocloud类别相同 WYFI - Neocloud类别相同 BITF - Neocloud类别相同 GLXY - Neocloud类别相同,有助于其建设 RBRK - 做过深度研究,中期网络安全板块很好的买入,他们只需缩减营销,然后看起来有更多自由现金流,因为他们将大部分运营支出花在营销上。 GRAB - 基本面很好,-6.56%修正再次买入 SEA - 东南亚的AMZN,很多人使用。仅因客户群+变现潜力就买入。基本面$50亿+收入38% Y/Y增长也很好。 META - 我真的很不喜欢他们在AI上的昂贵资本支出,因为他们并没有像ChatGPT那样推出前沿模型,谁知道Zuck在做什么。但除此之外,一个月下跌7.3%,回到$700支撑位,可能在这里买入以追赶是个好主意。 TGT - 下个月股息是好的催化剂。 SNAP - Jenners回来了(有助于人气),他们将前记忆运营支出转为收入,这可能会导致明年巨大的重估。只是受税务收割影响,否则现在会是强烈买入。通常税务收割事件在12月完成。 MU - 现在中国恐惧稍微减弱,MU因为建设中的内存使用而成为更强的买入。 RKLB - 中子,金色穹顶合同,很多催化剂 FLY - 中等提升 UNH - 不受大豆影响的医疗保健股,但有修正。机构发布持仓后可能会上涨(例如Warren可能买了更多) 随机想法 基本上任何不是Oklo的成长/风险股都很好,因为我们有 -> 10月底降息 -> 政府重新开放(可能在10月底或11月初) 进入 -> 12月降息。 -> 中期选举(对股票看涨) 通常市场崩盘发生在紧缩而非宽松时。你的愚蠢量子泡沫可能会再持续3-12个月。如果你做空,可能等到明年2月。 无论如何,这是风险偏好的好时机,特别是搭乘Neoclouds -> 相关板块(例如能源)-> 相关公司(例如smci, tsm等)的趋势。 我半开玩笑地说大豆,因为它可能签署了升级紧张局势,但我可能会看到明年前的上涨。另外我可以写很多关于每一个的内容,但这很耗时,但我会不时发布关于随机股票如$RBRK的投资逻辑帖子。 太空/机器人/能源/量子/AI/半导体/关键垂直领域是目前最顶级的,不要对抗动量。我可以认为某些东西被高估了(例如一些关键材料,因为与Neoclouds相比仍然具有投机性,后者基于Mag7的执行有保证的收入),但我不会在降息时做空它。 只是个人想法,非财务建议

    英文原文

    The Great Soybean/Seed Oil Crash, personal thoughts and explanations: Strong Buy $ALAB $CRDO $NBIS $WLAC $LTC $TSM $BTC (+ same as tax harvest stocks last time) $AMZN $SMCI _ Buy $AMD $FLNC $SEI $BZAI $NKLR $IREN $WULF $CIFR $CRWV $BITF $WYFI $SLNH $BITF $RBRK $GLXY $GRAB $SEA $META $TGT $SNAP $MU $RKLB $FLY $UNH Hold $MP $HOOD $EOSE $NVDA $GOOGL $DFLI $SOFI $VIRT $RR $AVGO $BE $ASTS (Hit the ticker maximum but everything else from last post, still sell on Quantum or Oklo) _ Strong Buys ALAB - Huge part of datacenter buildout, NVDA like margins, Mag7 customers. Already had competitors from AVGO, really don't think Arista would be a competitive threat. CRDO - Same sell-off as ALAB, thought they were both kind of overvalued before, but now they're back in correction territory so good to stock up. NBIS - $400 PT bull case. We have macro tailwind from government re-opening + rate cut EOM october into earnings, so short term looks promising. Lot of things going for it (eg. meta x crwv, so there's potential for more mag7 clients), sum of parts doing well, eg. clickhouse, and scaling rev from $100m to $1.5B+ a quarter is insane. there's already contracts locked in its just a matter of company execution. WLAC - Wrote a thesis about this earlier at $13. Even at $14.5 strong because it can re-rate 100%+ easily. LTC - Affected by leverage traders and government shutdown. The shutdown is predicted to last awhile and the main reason to buy was the ETF getting approved. But a great buy sub <$100 anyway, because it will get approved in due time (~95% chance). TSM - Holy crap. This would be a $3T company if this were a US company, insane profit margins, insane growth rate for their size. And every post you see about OpenAi X (**sydney sweeney partnership) or AMD buildout/NVDA buildout. TSM is the center of it all and would easily be a $2T+ company (from here at ~$1.5T), even if buying at ATHs. BTC - $112K good entry point. Goldt keeps hitting ATH, nothing really changed fundamentally, just lot of liquidations recently (+ same as tax harvest stocks last time) AMZN - I really don't know how it's still down YTD. I don't think Amazon needs much explaining but still growing (eg. AWS backlog massive, still going like 24% but not as much as ORCL, GCP and others obviously), but with EOY seasonality and runup to Feb, now is probably the best chance to catch the bottom. AMZN hitting $213-215 today was a good chance to stock up since it usually floats between $218-$227 if you're short term swing trading but long term I'd expect it to catchup to other mag7. SMCI - Underrated. Markets were looking short term performance, and Charles was quoting like 55%+ Y/Y forward revenue growth which nobody believed + backlog that didnt get realized yet. But now with all the data center buildouts, now it's kinda making sense. So should re-rate in the next two earnings. _ Buy AMD - So many deals from OpenAI x AMD, oracle building out with AMD, this is going to re-rate to a potential $1T+ company if it's actually a strong competitive to $NVDA. I don't think it's winner takes all and you can see a $4.5T+ market cap size with NVDA and some $350B marketcap size with AMD, so we can see a large ramp up (OpenAI is usually the leader in frontier models and if Sam says they can use AMD chips + elon said its' good for small-medium weight models, prboably means something positive) FLNC - Strong re-rate on energy after AI consumption, great buy. SEI - Strong re-rate on energy after AI consumption, great buy. BZAI - Someone else did a DD on this company, just cause of sector and shift to edge compute (eg. Robotics goign to be hot). Because of low MC and runup of similar companies could turn out well. NKLR - Nuclear stocks like $OKLO have been taking off, this is just follow the lader. IREN - Needs no introduction, huge GW compute capacity just no announced mag7 deals yet but could come anytime -> strong re-rate. Only reason not a strong buy is because not fully convinced miners can pivot like CRWV and maintain great margins (eg. $ORCL hit piece) but we'll see. WULF - GOOGL backlog, another $3.6+ or so in funding helps a lot. CIFR - Lot of info on X about future capacity and strong re-rating. Always liked this company because it was NBIS-lite. You can probably buy any Neocloud and it will go up because the sector is incredibly high potential with Mag7 funneling revenue. CRWV - Didn't like this as much as others because of debt but because of the seed oil correction much better buy point at $134 (below when META deal was announced) BITF - Same in Neocloud category WYFI - Same in Neocloud category BITF - Same in Neocloud category GLXY - Same in Neocloud category, helps with their buildout RBRK - Did a DD on this, great buy for cybersecurity sector in mid term, they just need to scale back marketing and then it looks like they have a lot more FCF because they're spending most OPEX on marketing. GRAB - Great fundamentally, -6.56% correction good to buy again SEA - AMZN in SEA, tons of people use them. Just a buy just because of costumer base + monetization potenetial. Fundamentally growing $5B+ rev 38% Y/Y is also great. META - I really don't like all their expensive capex on AI since they're not really putting out fronteir models like ChatGPT with it, who knows what Zuck is doing. But that aside, down 7.3% over the month, going to $700 support, probably a good buy around here to play catchup. TGT - Dividend next month good catalyst. SNAP - The Jenners are coming back (helps with popularity), they're shifting former memory opex to revenue, and this will probably cause a HUGE rerating next year. Just suffers from tax harvesting otherwise would be a strong buy rn. Usually tax harvesting events are kinda done in December. MU - Now that China fears are kinda less intense, MU is a lot stronger buy just cause of memory use on buildout. RKLB - Neutron, golden dome contracts, lot of cataylsts FLY - Medium lift UNH - Healthcare stock not affected by soybeans but had a correction. Would likely go up one instituions post their ports (eg. warren likely bought more) Random thoughts Basically any growth/risk stock that's not named Oklo is great because we have -> Rate Cut end of month October -> Government re-opening sometime (likely around end of Oct or early Nov) Into -> Rate Cut December. -> Midterms (Bullish for stocks) Usually market crashes happen when there's tightening not easing. And your stupid quantum bubbles would likely continue for another 3-12 months afterward. If you're short, then probably wait till next Feb. Anyway, this is a great time for risk-on, and specially riding trends with neoclouds -> affiliated sectors (eg. energy) -> affiliated companies (eg. smci, tsm, etc). I half joke-about soybeans because it likely signed escalating tensions, but I'd probably see a run-up into next year. Also I could write up a lot about each one but it's pretty time consuming but I'll put on a thesis post about random ones eg. $RBRK, from time to time. Space/robotics/energy/quantum/ai/semi/critical top verticals right now, don't fight against momentum. I can think something is overvalued (eg. some critical materials bc. it's still spectulative compared to neoclouds that kinda have guaranteed rev based on execution from mag7) but I wouldn't short it into rate cuts. Just personal thoughts, NFA

  11. 分析$RBRK基本面与估值,认为其是网络安全板块好买点,但非最佳机会。

    所以人们几乎每隔一条帖子就问起 $RBRK,我知道它在 X 上很火。 为了让大家别再问(我也在 $82 买入了一些 Rubrik),我最终去研究了一下它。 我的研究 TLDR(太长不看版): - 网络安全公司(该行业估值倍数极高,参考 $CRWD 或 $NET) - 80% 的毛利率(很棒) - ARR(年度经常性收入)超 10 亿美元,同比增长 40-50%(很棒) (对比 NET,ARR 约 22 亿+,同比增长 22%,市值几乎是其 5 倍) - 运营支出 (OpEx):60-75% 的收入用于营销。这是一个巨大的积极信号。 运营营销支出虽好,但短期看起来很难看,例如 $HOOD 给客户 3% 转账奖励时,这会伤害短期财报,因为具有误导性且没多少人做拆解;但长期来看,当削减支出时,客户粘性高,这对盈利能力帮助很大。 自由现金流 (FCF) 为正,但运营支出分解主要是营销,这是好事,不同于 Snapchat 的谷歌云运营支出。 - 客户基础多元化,像 Cloudflare(如高盛、百事、埃森哲等)。 缺点: - 资产负债表不是最好,约 11 亿美元债务用于资助收购。至少是为了收购。 - 不喜欢其远期收入数字放缓了 20-25%,相比之下 $NBIS 明年增长 700% 或更多。显然不公平比较,但这就是为什么我更看好 Neoclouds(新云基础设施)。 _ 看起来是一个不错的中期持有标的,计划很简单 -> 扩大客户群 -> 缩减营销 + 高粘性客户群 -> 赶上网络安全行业估值倍数并拥有更高的 FCF。 通常这类高毛利率(如 $HOOD 在 $18 时,增长 ~50% y/y)且实现盈利的成长型公司,重估 (re-rate) 幅度最大。 $RBRK 只需在未来减少营销支出,突然就会因为其粘性客户群拥有大量 FCF。 TLDR:网络安全板块的好买点,但其他地方有更好的机会。

    英文原文

    So people keep asking me about $RBRK almost every other post and I know it's really popular on X. I ended up looking into it so people stop asking (and added some Rubrik to my portfolio at $82). TLDR my own research: - Cybersecurity company (industry trades at extremely high multiples, look at $CRWD or $NET) - 80% gross margins (great) - $1B+ ARR, grew 40-50% Y/Y (great) (comparison to NET, ~2.2B+ ARR, growing 22% Y/Y, almost 5x the MC) - OpEx spend: 60-75% of revenue goes to marketing. This is a huge positive. OpEx marketing spend is great but it looks really bad short term eg. $HOOD when they give customers 3% to transfer, it hurts short term in earnings reports bc it's deceptive and not many people do the breakdown but long term when they cut back on spend, customers are sticky and this helps a lot with profitability. FCF was positive, but breakdown of opex expenses was mainly marketing, which is a good thing, unlike Snapchat google cloud opex. - Diversified client base like Cloudflare (eg. goldman, pepsi, accenture, etc). Downsides: - Balance sheet not the best, $1.1B debt or so to fund acquisitions. At least it's about acquisitions. - Don't like how their forward revenue numbers slowed down 20-25% compared to something like $NBIS growing like 700% or something more for next year. Obviously unfair comparison, but that's why I liked Neoclouds more. _ Looks like a good mid term hold with a pretty simple plan -> scale customer base -> scale back marketing + sticky base -> catch up to industry multiples in cybersecurity and hv higher FCF. Usually these types of growth companies with high gross margins (eg. $HOOD back at $18, growing ~50 y/y) that turn profitable, re-rate the hardest. $RBRK just gotta spend less on marketing down the road and suddenly they have a lot of fcf with their sticky customer base. TLDR: Great buy for cybersecurity sector, better opportunities elsewhere.

  12. 基于周五大跌,列出AI/加密/太空股买卖清单,看好Neocloud及算力基建。

    基于周五收盘(SPY跌3.6%)的思考与解释 强烈买入 $IBIT $LTC $WLAC $NBIS $MP $TSM (针对明年) $ETOR $DKNG $SNAP 买入 $UPWK $CRDO $ALAB $AMZN $META $UNH $SG $TGT $BULL $FLY $CIFR $WULF $IREN $GLXY $SMCI $DELL $MRVL 持有 $RKLB $HOOD $RBRK $MU $HOOD $GRAB $MARA $RIOT $NVO $RR $ELOSE $FLNC $SEI $PLTR 卖出 $CRCL $ETH $BMNR $PL $BKSY 强烈卖出 $RGTI $OKLO $IONQ $QBTS $QUBT _ 解释: IBIT - 跌至10.4万美元,比特币需求来自机构,关税担忧被夸大,并引发了历史上最大的清算事件之一。在我看来,清算后是购买加密货币的最佳时机。Polymarket仍定价年底有55%几率达到13万美元,但无论如何,比特币长期来看总是好的买入标的。 LTC - 单日下跌24%。使用10倍杠杆的人可能在抢先交易ETF并在交易所被清算。这可能是我见过的在98美元以下买入的最佳时机,因为政府停摆结束后ETF可能会获批。 WLAC - 由于与Fluidstack(帮助WULF和CIFR获得GOOGL背书的公司)的合作,以6亿美元估值成为有史以来最好的Neocloud SPAC IPO 1000%机会之一,而这两家公司估值为40-70亿美元。作为背景,他们将在Q4 IPO,所以你可能需要等待约2个月。 NBIS - 我持有信心最强的买入标的,明年任何Neocloud中都有400美元的激进目标价。 MP - 稀土的国家安全风险(+其他从勘探到锂电池的稀有材料股票表现可能会很好)。 TSM - 所有AI基础设施的骨干 _ 强烈买入的税务收割股票池 (可能需要等到明年) ETOR - 在38美元处严重超卖,可能是正在进行的税务收割事件叠加亏损。 DKNG - 本质上是一只成长股。鉴于市值,营收数据惊人,但他们处于年度低点-15%。可能受不受宏观影响的税务收割影响。 SNAP - 如果你读过我的论点,他们130亿美元的市值对应13亿美元的季度营收……我相信在降低运营支出+通过货币化GCP存储增加营收后,他们明年会重新评级。这只是市场何时定价的问题,但这需要1年以上。后投资者没有耐心。再次,可能受至今表现导致的年底税务收割影响。 _ 买入 UPWK - 昨日下跌4.5%,基本面极佳,~8亿同比营收,70%~或80%~的毛利率在增长,2亿回购,22亿市值。可能受罗素指数抛售影响。 CRDO - 数据中心交易,Mag7使用它们。 ALAB - 数据中心交易,Mag7使用它们。 AMZN - 虽然受到100%中国关税的实质性影响,但他们不会失去任何东西,因为成本会转嫁给商户或客户。 META - 可能因中国关税导致广告收入减少(例如,像Temu这样的中国供应商可能不会购买广告位),但仅基于-6%的1个月低点+作为落后于亚马逊的Mag7成员,我更看好它。 UNH - 医疗保健不太受100%中国关税或稀土影响。 SG - 下跌可能由于表现不佳+税务收割,但它几乎是1倍市销率(P/S)哈哈。 TGT - 我会将其列为强烈买入,因为股息催化剂+刚刚触及5年低点,但尚未对中国关税对该股票的影响做足够的研究。 BULL - 以与HOOD相似的速率增长,其基本面对于市值来说并不完全出色,但你会基于零售客户群和未来货币化潜力进行投资。 FLY - 我之前做过DD,但中型有效载荷很可能在2027年与诺斯罗普合作成功,这需要大量的耐心以换取潜在的1000%回报。 CIFR - Neocloud交易,始终看涨。像Meta X CRWV一样,更多细节可能很快公布。 WULF - Neocloud交易看涨。 IREN - Neocloud交易看涨。他们的融资轮次价格如果我记得没错的话是其股价的70%+,这是一个看涨信号(例如NBIS和CIFR在融资轮次后都达到了这一点)。 GLXY - Neocloud交易的一部分。 MRVL - 市场尚未充分定价其像NVDA一样56%的同比增长。 SMCI - 数据中心/星门建设 DELL - 数据中心/星门建设 _ 卖出 CRCL - 我会不断重复这一点,除非Circle能展示其能在利息收入之外货币化USDC,否则COIN优于Circle。因为COIN实际上获得50%的收入分成,再加上其平台上100%的收入。 ETH - 我会不断重复这一点,但我个人不会在3000美元以上买入。所以即使它下跌16%(你可以尝试波段交易,反弹至4000美元+),也始终有继续级联下跌至3000美元以下的风险,我已经数不清历史上发生过多少次了。 BMNR - 基本面与ETH挂钩。 PL - 太空股票已经上涨很多,我认为像RGTI和其他股票一样,基本面并未反映其市值。 BKSY - 太空股票已经上涨很多,我认为像RGTI和其他股票一样,基本面并未反映其市值。 强烈卖出 RGTI - 市值与估值极度脱节 OKLO - 市值与估值极度脱节 IONQ - 市值与估值脱节 QBTS - 市值与估值脱节 QUBT - 市值与估值脱节 显然存在中美贸易战的宏观压力,但这都不是新信息(中国稀土出口管制已为人所知一段时间+美国已经对中国商品征收关税) 我们正走向定价为70%的两次更多降息,以及大幅修正以清洗高估的泡沫并清算杠杆(例如加密货币),这将帮助市场走向更高的高点。我将始终推荐股票,因为对于好公司,如果你等待足够长的时间,它们可能会跑赢(但如果出现随机的宏观风险,短期可能会跑输)。 中期来看,我对Neoclouds在未来一年AI快速建设期间最为看好 -> 机器人/太空可能是之后的下一个前沿。 (该推文引用了 @aleabitoreddit 的推文,引用内容仅供理解语境): Neocloud论点:超大规模资本支出漏斗 为什么我要投入150万美元+到Neoclouds,以及为什么这可能是200-300%+的回报。 🔹 类别 Mag7合同:$CRWV, $NBIS ✅, $WULF, $CIFR ✅ 带算力:$IREN ✅, $BITF 投机性:$WYFI, $GRRR ✅, $SLNH 转向HPC的矿工:$RIOT, $MARA, $CLSK, $HUT 论点: Mag7的AI算力紧张,这是由$NVDA设计导致的。 原本流向AWS、MSFT Azure、Google Cloud用于传统算力的数万亿美元资本支出,现在当他们无法处理来自Anthropic、OpenAI、Gemini等的新AI负载时,将流入Neoclouds。 这是一个十年一遇的机会,类似于使$NVDA成为4万亿美元公司的GPU军备竞赛,关于谁将为未来5-10年的AWS/Azure等提供基础设施。 NBIS(来自MSFT的170亿)、CIFR / WULF(来自GOOGL的30亿)、CRWV(由NVDA背书)都在以百分之几百的速度扩张(NBIS从1.5亿季度营收到可能的15亿+),毛利率为60-80%。 这种营收增长在历史上几乎闻所未闻。这主要是因为最富有的超大规模公司将资本支出注入小公司。 NVDA / TSM (2022->): 超大规模公司的GPU CRDO / ALAB (2024 ->): 超大规模公司获胜 -> 抛物线增长。 NBIS/CIFR/IREN等 (2025 - ) AWS/Azure等 -> 来自AI算力的抛物线增长 这就是如何获得百分之几百的回报,而不是在Paypal上进行价值投资。动量驾驭下一代公司。 所以看空论点通常涉及 - 执行风险(以前更投机,现在像NBIS这样的公司有40亿+来执行) 人们总是担心执行,但微软或谷歌不会在没有自己尽职调查的情况下签署如此大的5-10年合同。 - 高利率(主要看你CRWV),这就是为什么NBIS、CIFR和其他公司有潜在的惊人回报。 你有40亿+的资金用于$NBIS在138美元+每股(当它是107美元时)。以及$CIFR在16美元+每股的资金当它是11美元时。高于当前价格的融资是一个看涨信号。 - GPU折旧(有效的担忧,但它几乎像石油,即使是旧型号也保持价值并仍然提供权益)。 - 估值(我认为我们才刚刚开始。如果NBIS明年扩展到60亿营收75%毛利率),260亿市值非常小。 - NVDA可能推出自己的GPU即服务并直接竞争。目前这些Neoclouds是NVDA防止对Azure/AWS等集中风险的答案。 - 自定义超大规模芯片如TPU、Trainium。但可能还需要几年,因为他们仍在乞求NVDA算力并签署了5-10年合同。 无论如何,像Nebius这样的Neoclouds相对于远期营收/毛利率确实被低估了。 我们仍然非常早期。确保像特朗普选举时的Crypto/TSLA或OpenAI发布时的NVDA一样驾驭Neocloud浪潮。 当然这是高度投机的,我不会建议全仓YOLO,但为Google/MSFT等AI工作负载提供动力的这些5-200亿Neoclouds的风险回报是值得的。(交易时间范围:8个月-1年。) 这是2025-2026年最好的非对称AI基础设施交易。

    英文原文

    Based Friday Market Close (-3.6% SPY day), Thoughts and Explanations Strong Buy $IBIT $LTC $WLAC $NBIS $MP $TSM (For Next Year) $ETOR $DKNG $SNAP Buy $UPWK $CRDO $ALAB $AMZN $META $UNH $SG $TGT $BULL $FLY $CIFR $WULF $IREN $GLXY $SMCI $DELL $MRVL Hold $RKLB $HOOD $RBRK $MU $HOOD $GRAB $MARA $RIOT $NVO $RR $ELOSE $FLNC $SEI $PLTR Sell $CRCL $ETH $BMNR $PL $BKSY Strong Sell $RGTI $OKLO $IONQ $QBTS $QUBT _ Explanations: IBIT - Dumped to $104k, Bitcoin demand has been institutional, tariff fears overblown, and caused one of the biggest liquidation events in history. IMO post-liquidation is the best time to buy crypto. Polymarket still pricing in 55% chance to $130K EOY, but either way Bitcoin is always a good buy long term. LTC - Down 24% in one day. People on 10X margin were likely frontrunning ETF and got liquidated one exchanges. Probably the best time I've seen to buy sub $98 because ETF will likely get approved when government shutdown stops. WLAC - One of the best Neocloud SPAC IPO 1000% opportunities ever at $600m valuation because of their partnership with Fluidstack (the ones that helps WULF + CIFR get backstopped by GOOGL), and both of those are $4-7B. For context they're IPOing Q4, so you might need to wait ~2 months. NBIS - Strongest conviction buy I've had, $400 aggressive PT for next year out of any Neocloud. MP - National security risk for rare earths (+other rare materials stocks from exploration to Lithium batteries will likely perform well). TSM - Backbone of all AI Infrastructure _ Strong Buy Tax Harvesting Bucket of Stocks (Might need to wait for next year) ETOR - Way too oversold at $38, likely tax harvesting event going on compounding losses. DKNG - Fundamentally a growth stock. Revenue numbers are insane given market cap but they're -15% yearly low. Likely compounded by tax harvesting unaffected by Macro. SNAP - If you read my thesis, they're doing 1.3B quarterly revenue off a 13B marketcap... I'm convinced they will re-rate next year after lowering opex + increasing revenue from monetizing GCP storage. It's just a matter of when the market will price this in, but this is 1Y+ out. Post investors aren't patient. Again likely affected by EOY tax harvesting due to performance so far. _ Buys UPWK - Down 4.5% from yesterday, amazing fundamentals, ~800m y/y rev off 70%~ or 80~ gross margins thats growing, 200m buybacks, 2.2B market cap. Likely affected by Russell selloff. CRDO - Data Center Trade, Mag7 uses them. ALAB - Data Center Trade, Mag7 uses them. AMZN - It's materially affected by 100% Chinese tariffs but they won't lose anything, since it gets passed onto the merchant or customers. META - Probably less ad revenue by Chinese tariffs (eg. Chinese vendors like Temu, might not buy adspace), buy just based on -6% 1m low + Mag7 laggard with Amazon, I like it more. UNH - Healthcare not really impacted 100% Chinese Tariff or rare earths. SG - It's down likely due to bad performance + tax harvesting but it's almost 1 P/S lol. TGT - I'd put it Strong Buy due to dividend catalyst + 5Y low just now, but haven't dont enough research on the effect on Chinese tariffs on the stock yet. BULL - Growing at similar rates asHOOD, their fundamentals aren't exactly great for the market cap but you would invest based on retail customer base and the future potential for monetization. FLY - I did a DD on this earlier but Medium Lift Payload likely to succeed with Northrop in 2027, it takes a TON of patience for a potential 1000% moonshot. CIFR - Neocloud trade, always bullish. Like Meta X CRWV, more details likely to come soon. WULF - Neocloud trade bullish. IREN - Neocloud trade bullish. Their funding round was at some number 70%+ of their stock price if I remember correctly, which is a bullish tell (eg. NBIS and CIFR both hit that after their fundraising round). GLXY - Part of Neocloud trade. MRVL - It's not really priced in that it's growing 56% Y/Y like NVDA. SMCI - Data center/stargate buildout DELL -Data center/stargate buildout _ Sell CRCL - I will keep repeating this but COIN is better than Circle unless Circle can show they can monetize USDC outside from interest income. Because COIN literally gets 50% revenue sharing and on top of that 100% of the revenue on its platform. ETH - I will keep repeating this but I will not personally buy above $3000. So even if it dips 16% (you can take the chance of a swing trade, back up to $4k+), there's always the chance it keeps cascading down below $3k and I've lost track of how many times this has happened in history. BMNR - Tied with ETH fundamentally. PL - Space stocks have gone up a lot, I think with stuff like RGTI and others, fundamentals haven't mirrored it's marketcap. BKSY - Space stocks have gone up a lot, I think with stuff like RGTI and others, fundamentals haven't mirrored it's marketcap. Strong Sell RGTI - market cap extremely disconnected from valuation OKLO - market cap extremely disconnected from valuation IONQ - market cap disconnected from valuation QBTS - market cap disconnected from valuation -market cap disconnected from valuation There's obviously a macro overhead with China x USA trade wars going on, but none of this was new information (Chinese rare earth export controls have been known for awhile + US has already been tarrifing Chinese goods) We're heading into 2x more rate cuts priced in at 70% and large corrections to cleanse the overvalued froth and liquidate margins (eg. Crypto), will help the market go to higher highs. I will always recommend shares because with good companies, if you wait long enough they will likely outperform (but short term underperform if there's random macro risk). Mid term I'm the most bullish on Neoclouds for the next year during the rapid AI buildout -> Robotics/Space likely next frontier after that.

  13. 分析$FLY与诺斯罗普合作开发中型火箭的潜力,认为其风险回报优于$RKLB。

    自从我在 Reddit 发帖后,很多人询问我的 $FLY 投资论点,现在分享如下: Firefly 是一家像 $RKLB 这样的火箭公司,正在开发可重复使用的中型运载火箭。 目前唯一存在的竞争对手是 SpaceX。 他们目标在 2026-2027 年实现,如果成功,公司市值将重估至 300-700 亿美元,较当前(44 亿美元市值)增长 1000-2000%。 更多细节: 300-700 亿美元的市值估算基于 $RKLB 的估值倍数,且仅假设中型运载火箭业务成功。(我忽略了其他业务板块和当前超过 10 亿美元的订单积压)。 在中型运载火箭业务上:预计年收入约 9-13 亿美元,在可行的发射节奏(8-12 次)下,毛利率为 30-40%。猎鹰系列火箭的定价支持这一预期。 所以现在唯一的问题是,FLY 能成功吗? 在 Firefly 最近一次发射失败后,股价下跌 50%,市场已经计入了未来失败的风险。看空者指出 Alpha 火箭的失败代表了执行风险。然而,他们完全错误地定价了这种风险... 他们应该问的问题是:诺斯罗普 (Northrop) 和 Firefly 能否共同成功? 这是美国最大的航空航天国防承包商之一诺斯罗普,与一家市值仅 40 亿美元的发射公司之间的联合开发 (Co-development)。 诺斯罗普此前曾拥有自己的中型运载火箭,但不得不终止。诺斯罗普之前的发射器 Antares 230 在俄罗斯 2022 年入侵乌克兰之前运行正常,随后供应链被切断。 然而,诺斯罗普面临生存问题:它无法再制造自己的第一级火箭。因此,为了节省时间,他们寻找一家拥有现成推进系统和结构的美国合作伙伴:Firefly。 -> 动机:Firefly 的 Miranda 发动机提供了即插即用的替代方案,可立即构建中型运载火箭。 现在你拥有一枚在 2026-2027 年可由 Firefly 货币化的中型运载火箭(因为诺斯罗普持有该公司股份),只需使其可重复使用,这是最难的部分。 但诺斯罗普不仅仅是“帮忙”。它在各个方面结构性地降低了风险。诺斯罗普的系统加上 Firefly 的新太空发动机,占据了稀缺且高需求的护城河(美国可重复使用中型运载火箭),这已通过 TacRS 和超过 10 亿美元的订单积压以及美国“金穹”防御系统催化剂得到验证。 因此,购买 Firefly 的风险回报比是合理的,前提是公司在中型运载火箭上成功并建立巨大的护城河,成为下一个 SpaceX。 (我的投资组合中也有 $RKLB,但我认为由于中型运载火箭已与诺斯罗普合作存在,成功实现可重复使用中型运载火箭的机会高于正常水平。) 显然,Rocket Lab 实现可重复使用中型运载火箭的成功概率更高,但这已经反映在其 320 亿美元以上的市值中,相比之下 Fly 的市值仅为 44 亿美元。 我认为 $FLY 在当前估值下是一个有趣的 10 倍潜力股,前提是它能在未来一两年内成功。另外,我只是真的很喜欢火箭。 我还让 Grok 计算了概率,因为 XAI 由火箭人 (Rocketman) 本人拥有。 输出: 到 2027 年底,Rocket Lab 有 90% 以上的机会实现可重复使用中型运载火箭飞行(可能在 2026 年中),得益于其先发优势、经过验证的执行力和内部控制。 Firefly/诺斯罗普达到 75-80% 的概率,得益于诺斯罗普的遗产,但受限于 Firefly 较新的运营记录。额外的一年缩小了差距——如果 Antares 330 按时飞行且 Miranda 发动机规模化,Firefly 可能在 2027 年底匹配或超过 Neutron 的节奏。 如果两者都成功(这是一个巨大的假设),RKLB 的市值可能重估至 600 亿美元,$FLY 可能重估至 400 亿美元,只是因为太空 TAM(总可寻址市场)因国家安全风险和企业部门建设而迅速增加,可能只需再等一年。

    英文原文

    People have been asking for my $FLY thesis since my Reddit post, so here it is: Firefly is a rocket company like $RKLB, and is developing a reusable medium-lift rocket. The only one that exists is SpaceX. They target 2026-2027, and if they succeed, the company would re-rate to a 30-70B market cap, 1000-2000% from here (4.4B MC) More details: The 30-70B marketcap estimate is priced off $RKLB multiples, and only on medium-lift working. (I'm ignoring other business segments and current $1B+ revenue backlog). In a year with medium-lift: ~$0.9–1.3B revenue, with 30–40% gross margins at workable cadence (8–12 flights). Falcon-class pricing support this. So now the only question is, can FLY make it work? After Fly's individual company latest launch failure, the stock dropped 50% and the market is already pricing in the feature of failure. The bears are pointing to Alpha's failures for execution risk. HOWEVER, they're pricing the risk in completely wrong... The question they should be asking is, whether both Northrop + Firefly can make this work? This is a CO-DEVELOPMENT between Northrop, one of America's largest military contractors for Aerospace with some tiny $4B marketcap launch company. Northrop literally had its own medium-lift rocket before but they had to sunset it. Northrop’s prior launcher, Antares 230 worked before Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, then the supply chain was cut off. However, Northrop faced an existential problem: it couldn’t build its own first stage anymore. So they went looking for a U.S. partner with ready-made propulsion and structures for the sake of time: Firefly. -> Motivation: Firefly’s Miranda engines offered a plug-and-play replacement to immediately build a medium lift launcher. And now you have a medium lift launcher in 2026-2027 that Firefly monetizes (because Northrop took a stake in the company), just need to make it re-usable, which is the hard part. But Northrop doesn’t just “help.” It structurally lowers risk across every aspect across the board. And Northrop’s system + Firefly’s new-space engines hits a scarce, high-demand moat (U.S. medium-lift with reuse), already validated by TacRS and a $1B+ backlog + US golden dome defense system catalyst. So, risk reward of buying Firefly on the company succeeding on Medium-Lift Launcher and developing a huge moat to be the next SpaceX, is decent. (I also have $RKLB in my portfolio too, I just see the opportunity of succeeding in reusable Medium Lift to be higher than normal because it medium-lift already existed with Northrop). Obviously Rocketlab has a higher probability of success achieving reusable medium lift, but that's already priced into its 32B+ marketcap, compared to a 4.4B Fly marketcap. I just find $FLY to be an interesting 10x moonshot at this valuation in the chance it works in the next year or two. Also I just really like rockets. I also had Grok calculate the odds since XAI is owned by Rocketman himself. _ Output: By end-2027, Rocket Lab has a 90%+ chance of achieving reusable medium-lift flights (likely by mid-2026), driven by their head start, proven execution, and in-house control. Firefly/Northrop reaches 75–80% probability, bolstered by Northrop’s legacy but tempered by Firefly’s newer operational track record. The extra year narrows the gap—Firefly could match or exceed Neutron’s cadence by late 2027 if Antares 330 flies on time and Miranda engines scale. In the event they both get it to work (big if), RKLB could re-rate to $60B marketcap, and $FLY could re-rate to 40B marketcap, just because of TAM of Space rapidly increasing from national security risks and corporate sector buildout, just might need to wait another year.

  14. 博主分享6只个股的短期交易策略,强调经验直觉胜过耐心口号。

    最近 X 上流传着很多鼓舞人心的交易者心态,比如: “会有回报的。要有耐心。”全是废话。 交易者会考虑板块动量、催化剂、估值、回调、宏观、隐含波动率(IV)、期权流向等。 以下是我对各种股票短期交易的心态: 1. $NBIS - $111.91,尽管当天上涨了 1.53%,但由于 Meta 给予其 140 亿美元合同,CRWV 上涨了 12%。 这通常对所有新云厂商都是利好。它曾飙升至 $117(我可能仍会持有),但随后回落至 $111,可能是由于未平仓合约过多,但我们可能会继续看到上涨行情。因此我会利用这段时间进行定投(DCA)并买入看涨期权/股票,即使它已经上涨了 1.53%。 这不是“真正的下跌”,更像是上涨过程中的回调。 2. $HIMS - $56.4 下跌 4.67%,通常人们只是盲目抄底,但这实际上是由重大因素引起的,即特朗普推出了面向消费者的政府药品网站。随着股价升至 $60,空头比率降至 33%。 这次下跌可能会被用于空头回补。我在 $46 支撑位买入,但在反弹后不久卖出,因为我感觉它还会进一步下跌。但我个人更喜欢底部入场点,所以可能更接近 $50。 我记得 AMZN 推出竞争对手时,HIMS 暴跌 20% 然后再次上涨,我预计特朗普的计划中期也会如此,但近期它是一个逆风因素。 3. $RDDT - $228,下跌 5.45%,没有新闻。可能只是估值担忧。我们看到类似的增长股如 ALAB、CRED 有随机的 20% 回调。许多软件/社交股票如 SNAP 因非重大新闻下跌 8.1%。修正很健康,股票不会一直上涨,我个人更倾向于等待再次回到 $100+,而不是 $200+,但鉴于 RDDT 在随机日子有更大的 5-8% 回调,根据历史经验,6-7% 的下跌是日内的好买点,你可能会看到它恢复,但我们可能会看到许多增长股在 11/12 月的大涨前经历更大的修正,所以可能不是真正的底部。 我现在不看图表 RSI,只是基于过去一两年每天观察股票 + IV 的经验感觉来做。 4. AMZN - 没有重大宏观新闻,可能是 10 月 1 日的政府停摆可能会引起指数恐慌,但这没什么大不了的。它下跌了 1.35%,所以我会买入,因为这是摊低成本的好时机。 5. Klarna - $36,下跌 5.3%。有时你只是凭直觉行事。低于 IPO 价格,没有重大新闻。大多数 IPO 都下跌了,比如 Gemini 等。如果你想建立长期头寸,我会在这个水平买入。 6. TSM - $277,我有罪地进行了 $273-$279 之间的波段交易,所以我每次跌至 $273 就买入,在 $277-$279 卖出以获取 2% 的纯股票利润。到目前为止,我用股票做了大约 2 次。如果跌破 $273,我就定投,如果进一步下跌就切换到看涨期权。 没有绝对的对错方式,每个人都有自己的方法。(另外抱歉 CRM,糟糕的财报搞错了那个,如果进一步下跌我可能会摊平成本)。 但一般来说,这只是我浏览每只股票清单时的想法。再次强调,每个人想法不同,我只是想写下我的思考过程,如果对他有帮助的话。

    英文原文

    Lot of inspirational trader mindsets going around X lately like: "It will pay off. Be Patient". All BS. Traders consider sector momentum, catalysts, valuation, pullbacks, macro, IV, option flows, etc. Here's my mindset for short term trading for various stocks: 1. $NBIS - $111.91, even though it's up 1.53% on the day, CRWV is up 12% off Meta gives them a $14B contract. So usually it's bullish for all neoclouds. It spiked to $117 ( i probably would have still held) but pulled back to $111 likely from too much open interest, but we'll likely keep seeing a rally upward. So I'd use this time to DCA and buy calls/shares even if it's up 1.53% Not "truly a dip" but it's more of a dip during a rally. 2. $HIMS - $56.4 Down 4.67%, usually people just blindly buy the dip but this was actually caused from something material, which was Trump launching a direct to consumer GOV drug website. Short interest decreased back to 33% on the rise to $60. This dip will likely be used for short covering. I did buy $46 support but sold shortly on a bounce after I just felt like it would go down more. But I just personally prefer bottom entry points so that's probably closer to $50. I still remember AMZN launching a competitor, HIMS crashed 20% then rose again, I'd expect the same with Trump's program mid term but near term it's a headwind. 3. $RDDT - $228, down 5.45%, no news. Just probably valuation concerns. We saw similar growth stocks like ALAB, CRED, have random 20% pullbacks. Lot of software/social stocks like SNAP down 8.1% off non-material news. Correction is healthy, stocks don't just keep going up, I'd prefer to wait in the $100+ again, rather than $200+ (just personally), but it's actually a better buy than the rest, given RDDT has larger 5-8% pullbacks on random days, just from historical experiences so 6-7% drop is a good buy intra-day and you'd likely see it recover but we might see a lot of growth stocks have a larger correction into massive rally Nov/Dec so might not be an actual bottom. I don't really look at chart RSI nowadays, just do this based on feelings from experience looking at the stock + IV every day for the past year or two. 4. AMZN - No major macro news, prob government shutdown Oct 1st that might cause some panic for index but it's pretty immaterial. It dropped, 1.35% so I'd buy since it' a good time to cost average. 5. Klarna - $36, 5.3% drop. Sometimes you just go off gut feeling. Below IPO price, no major news. Most IPOs were down like Gemini, etc. If you wanted to build a long term position I'd buy at this level. 6. TSM - $277, I've been guilty of swing trading between $273-$279, so I just buy every drop to $273 and sell at $277-$279 for 2% profit purely with shares. So far I've done this ~2 times with shares. If it drops past $273, I'd just DCA and then if it drops further switch to calls. There's no True or False way to do this, everyone kind of has their own approach. (also sorry about CRM, bad earnings got that one wrong, I'll probably cost avg if ti declines further). But generally this is just what I'm thinking about when I go down the list of every single stock. Once again, everyone thinks differently, I just wanted to write down how I think if it's helpful to others.

  15. 博主发布周一收盘观点,列出多只美股的买卖评级及具体逻辑。

    周一收盘思考: 极强买入 $NBIS $ETOR $LTC $VIRT 买入 $AMZN $SMCI $TGT $CRM $TSM $CRDO $SG $CIFR $LULU $SLNH $ORCL $MSTR $RIOT $MARA 持有 $IREN $HIMS $RKLB $PYPL $MRVL $IBIT $UPWK $GRAB $ALAB $ASTS $SOFI $NVDA $NVO 卖出 $HOOD $TSLA $RDDT $CRCL $PLTR $BMNR 强烈卖出 $OKLO $QBTS $IONQ _ 欢迎持不同意见,但这只是我的个人看法。 极强买入理由 - 买入约7万美元的Virtu看涨期权,隐含波动率28%,远期市盈率仅6.6倍,被低估。 - 在通往200美元的路上,每次回调都定投NBIS。 - ETOR在39美元时严重被低估。我不明白它怎么跌到那的。如果我没记错,市值33亿,现金储备超7亿,复利增长类似IBKR而非HOOD/BULL,但股价却直线跌破IPO价。 - LTC ETF批准在即(3-4天内),概率95%。除非被拒,现在是绝佳买点。 买入理由 - 今天买入5万美元以上Amazon看涨期权,回调至219美元以上后复苏前景看好。受益于10月至1月的年底季节性效应。10月8日Prime Day。可能再次回调,因此适合定投而非极强买入。 - SMCI仍预测55%的远期营收增长,季度营收超50亿,有点被低估。 - TGT下个月分红。有些Target事件,但我觉得不如Amazon Prime Day重要。 - CRM图表上看刚触底,基本面没太大变化。 - TSM在273美元更好,虽然总是好买点,但不像250美元以下那样极具吸引力。 - CRDO/ALAB,两者大幅回调。更像是修正而非崩盘,因此再次成为不错的买点。 - SG,不知道。我只是喜欢他们的沙拉,考虑到不久前交易价40美元,8美元的风险回报比不错。 - CIFR,GOOGL背书,现在看执行。我会逢低买入,但今天大涨了。 - LULU受益于10月至1月的年底季节性假日购物。 - SLNH,据说X上有关于波浪的讨论。市值很小约1亿美元,风险回报比似乎可以。 - ORCL,以140亿美元折扣估值持有TikTok美国大量股份,且来自OpenAI/MSFT的远期营收众多。就像AVGO一样,财报后可能回调,然后一两个月后迎来猛烈反弹。 - MSTR,比特币10月表现良好。被做空,所以溢价率可能在1.4x-1.5x,相比炒作时的2x。 - RIOT/MARA转向HPC,所以我比之前更喜欢它们。 持有股票没什么变化 - Hood,我个人做日内交易,所以如果我认为在单日上涨12.27%的130美元以上卖出是好的,别介意。 - TSLA,脱离基本面的信仰股。 - RDDT,我在100美元时持有大量,现在240美元或450亿市值不会买,所以可能会卖出/三角套利。 - CRCL,直接买Coinbase。 - PLTR,脱离基本面的信仰股,大部分利润只是利息收入。 - BMNR,如果你想买就买ETH,但ETH在4000美元以上也是强烈卖出。 强烈卖出 任何营收极少但市值100-200亿以上的股票我觉得很可笑。如果你从8美元持有OKLO到116美元,向你致敬。

    英文原文

    Monday Market Close Thoughts: Extremely Strong Buy $NBIS $ETOR $LTC $VIRT Buy $AMZN $SMCI $TGT $CRM $TSM $CRDO $SG $CIFR $LULU $SLNH $ORCL $MSTR $RIOT $MARA Hold $IREN $HIMS $RKLB $PYPL $MRVL $IBIT $UPWK $GRAB $ALAB $ASTS $SOFI $NVDA $NVO Sell $HOOD $TSLA $RDDT $CRCL $PLTR $BMNR Strong Sell $OKLO $QBTS $IONQ _ Feel free to disagree but these are just my thoughts Strong Buy Explanations - Bought ~$70K of Virtu calls, 28% IV and just 6.6 forward p/e is undervalued. - Always DCA NBIS on the road to $200 on every dip. -ETOR is just way too undervalued at $39 imo. I don't even know how it hit that. If I remember correctly $700M+ cash pile on a 3.3B market cap, compounding similar rate to IBKR instead of HOOD/BULL but just straight line down below IPO price. - LTC ETF approval in 3-4 days with 95% odds. Great buy now unless it gets rejected ofc. Buy Explanations - Bought $50k+ Amazon calls today, looks more promising for recovery on the dip to $219+. Benefits from end of year seasonality from Oct - > Jan. Prime Day Oct 8th. Could dip again which is why it's good to DCA and not an extremely strong buy. - SMCI still projecting 55% forward revenue growth and it's kinda undervalued doing 5B+ quarterly revenue lol - TGT dividend in another month. There's some Target event but don't really think it matters as much as Amazon prime day. - CRM just bottoming chart wise, fundamentals not really changed - TSM better at $273, it's always a good buy but not a screaming buy like sub $250 - CRDO/ALAB, both dipped a lot. More of a correction rather than crash, which is why it's a decent buy agian. - SG, idk. I just like their salad and think risk reward at $8 is good considering they were trading $40 not too long ago. - CIFR, GOOGL backstopped now just execution. I'd buy on dips but today was a big rally - LULU benefits from Oct -> Jan end of year seasonality with holiday shopping. - SLNH, apparently waves have been going around X. Pretty small $100m marketcap or so, risk reward seems okay. - ORCL, they're a large shareholder of TikTok US at a discounted 14B valuation and have tons of forward rev from OpenAI/MSFT. It's one of those things where it probably dips after earnings like AVGO then pulls off a face ripping rally a month or two later. - MSTR, Bitcoin does well in Oct. Been shorted so Nav prem is probably around 1.4x-1.5x compared to 2x like during hype waves -RIOT/MARA pivoted to HPC so I like them more than before For hold stocks nothing really changed - Hood, I personally day trade so don't be offended if I think it's a good sell $130+ on a 12.27% increase day. - TSLA, cult stock detached from fundamentals - RDDT, I had a lot back at $100 wouldn't buy at $240 or 45B marketcap now so would probably sell/tri. - CRCL, just buy Coinbase instead - PLTR, cult stock detached from fundamentals, large part of their profit is just interest income - BMNR, just buy ETH if you want but ETH is a strong sell at $4k+ Strong Sell Anything carrying barely any rev with 10-20B+ marketcap I think is amusing . Props to you if you held OKLO from $8 to $116 though.

  16. 解析超大规模云厂商资本支出向NeoClouds转移的逻辑,看好NBIS等标的的高回报潜力。

    NeoCloud 论点:超大规模云厂商资本支出漏斗 为什么我要投入 150 万美元以上到 NeoClouds(新型云服务商),以及为什么这可能带来 200-300%+ 的回报。 🔹 分类 Mag7(美股七巨头)合约方:$CRWV, $NBIS ✅, $WULF, $CIFR ✅ 带算力:$IREN ✅, $BITF 投机性:$WYFI, $GRRR ✅, $SLNH 转向 HPC(高性能计算)的矿工:$RIOT, $MARA, $CLSK, $HUT 论点: Mag7 的 AI 算力紧张,这是 $NVDA 设计使然。 原本流向 AWS、MSFT Azure、Google Cloud 用于传统算力的数万亿美元资本支出,当它们无法处理来自 Anthropic、OpenAI、Gemini 等的新 AI 负载时,现在将漏斗式流入 NeoClouds。 这是一个十年一遇的机会,类似于让 $NVDA 成为 4 万亿美元公司的 GPU 军备竞赛,关键在于未来 5-10 年为 AWS/Azure 等提供基础设施支持的是谁。 NBIS(来自 MSFT 的 170 亿)、CIFR / WULF(来自 GOOGL 的 30 亿)、CRWV(由 NVDA 背书)都在以数百百分比的速度扩张(NBIS 季度收入从 1.5 亿增长到可能超过 15 亿),且拥有 60-80% 的毛利率。 这种收入增长在历史上几乎闻所未闻。这主要是因为最富有的超大规模云厂商将资本支出漏斗式注入这些小公司。 NVDA / TSM(2022->):为超大规模云厂商提供 GPU CRDO / ALAB(2024 ->):超大规模云厂商获胜 -> 抛物线式增长。 NBIS/CIFR/IREN 等(2025 - )AWS/Azure 等 -> 来自 AI 算力的抛物线式增长 这就是如何获得数百百分比回报的方法,而不是在 Paypal 上进行价值投资。动量交易下一代公司。 所以看空论点通常涉及 - 执行风险(以前更偏向投机,现在像 NBIS 这样的公司有 40 多亿资金来执行) 人们总是担心执行问题,但如果微软或谷歌没有做自己的尽职调查,是不会签署如此大的 5-10 年合约的。 - 高利率(主要看你 CRWV),这就是为什么 NBIS、CIFR 等具有惊人的回报潜力。 $NBIS 在每股 138 美元以上时有 40 多亿资金(现在是 107 美元)。$CIFR 在每股 16 美元以上时有资金(现在是 11 美元)。高于当前价格的资金是一个看涨信号。 - GPU 折旧(有效的担忧,但这几乎像石油一样,即使是旧型号也保持了价值并仍然提供权益)。 - 估值(我认为我们才刚刚开始。如果 NBIS 明年规模达到 60 亿收入,75% 毛利率),260 亿市值非常小。 - NVDA 可能推出自己的 GPU 即服务并直接竞争。目前这些 NeoClouds 是 NVDA 防止对 Azure/AWS 等集中风险的答案。 - 定制超大规模云厂商芯片如 TPU、Trainium。但可能还需要几年,因为他们仍在乞求 NVDA 算力并签署了 5-10 年合约。 无论如何,像 Nebius 这样的 NeoClouds 相对于远期收入/毛利率确实被低估了。 我们仍然处于非常早期的阶段。确保像特朗普选举时的 Crypto/TSLA 或 OpenAI 发布时的 NVDA 一样搭乘 NeoCloud 浪潮。 当然,这高度投机,我不会建议全仓 YOLO,但对于这些为 Google/MSFT 等(Mag7 的现金牛)提供 AI 工作负载的小型 5-200 亿 NeoClouds,风险与回报是值得的。(交易时间范围:8 个月 - 1 年。) 这是 2025-2026 年最好的非对称 AI 基础设施交易。

    英文原文

    The NeoCloud Thesis: Hyperscaler Capex Funnel Why I'm putting $1.5M+ into Neoclouds, and why this might be a 200-300%+ return. 🔹 Buckets Mag7 contracts: $CRWV, $NBIS ✅, $WULF, $CIFR ✅ With compute: $IREN ✅, $BITF Speculative: $WYFI, $GRRR ✅, $SLNH Miners pivoting to HPC: $RIOT, $MARA, $CLSK, $HUT Thesis: Mag7 is AI compute strained, by design from $NVDA. Trillions of capex that normally flowed through AWS, MSFT Azure, Google Cloud for traditional compute, will now funnel into NeoClouds when they cant handle new AI loads from Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, etc. This is a once-a-decade opportunity, similar to the GPU arms race that made $NVDA a $4T company, on who powers the infra for AWS/Azure/etc for the next 5-10 years. NBIS (17B from MSFT), CIFR / WULF (3B from GOOGL), CRWV (backstopped by NVDA) are all scaling hundreds of percent (NBIS went from 150M quarterly revenue to likely 1.5B+) with 60-80% gross profit margins. This revenue growth is almost unheard in history. It's mainly because it's the wealthiest hyperscalers funneling capex into tiny companies. NVDA / TSM (2022->): GPU for hyperscalers CRDO / ALAB (2024 ->): hyperscaler wins -> parabolic growth. NBIS/CIFR/IREN/etc (2025 - ) AWS/Azure/etc. -> parabolic growth from AI compute This is how you get hundreds of % in return, not value investing in Paypal. Momentum riding the next generational companies. So bear thesis usually involves around - Execution Risk (before it was more speculative, now companies like NBIS have 4B+ to execute) People can always worry about execution but Microsoft or Google would not be signing such large 5-10 year contracts without their own DD. - Large interest rates (mainly looking at you CRWV), that's why NBIS, CIFR, and others have potential amazing returns. You have 4B+ in funding for $NBIS at $138+ a share (when it's $107 now). And funding for $CIFR at $16+ a share when it's $11 now. ABOVE current price funding is a bullish tell. - GPU depreciation (valid concern but it's almost like oil, even older models kept their value and still deliver equity). - Valuation (I still think we're just getting started. If NBIS scales to 6B rev next year 75% gross margin), 26B marketcap is extremely tiny. - NVDA potentially launching their own GPU-as-a-service and directly competing. Right now these Neoclouds are NVDA's answer to preventing concentration risk to Azure/AWS/etc. - Custom hyperscaler chips like TPU, Trainium. But likely years away, since they're still begging for NVDA compute and signed 5Y-10Y contracts. Regardless these neoclouds like Nebius are really undervalued relative to forward revenue/gross margins. We're still very early. Make sure to ride the Neocloud wave like Crypto/TSLA with Trump election or NVDA with OpenAI release. Of course this is highly speculative and I wouldn't YOLO full port calls, but Risk vs. Reward on these little 5-20B neoclouds powering AI workloads for Google/MSFT/etc, the cash cows of Mag7, is worth it. (Trade time Horizon: 8m - 1 year.) This is the single best asymmetric AI infrastructure trade for 2025-2026.

  17. 澄清未买IREN,建议投机性关注MARA、RIOT或WYFI。

    @__visionxry__ 我从未买入 $IREN。我只是在观察比特币挖矿股票在未来几个月的潜力。 如果非要在这两只股票上进行投机性赌博,我可能会买入 $MARA / $RIOT 或 $WYFI。

    英文原文

    @__visionxry__ I never entered $IREN. I was just looking at potential of bitcoin mining stocks over the next few months. I'd probably buy $MARA / $RIOT or $WYFI if i had to take a speculative gamble on two though.

  18. 关注IREN,类比NBIS,看好矿企转型AI的投资机会。

    在 $IREN 涨至 $30+ 后,我仍在关注它。这让我想起 $CRWV 大幅上涨后的 $NBIS。 有什么能阻止 $MARA、$RIOT、$CIFR、$CLSK、$HUT 等从比特币(BTC)转向人工智能(AI)吗? 这可能是一个绝佳的投资机会。https://t.co/1HJSHsiPml

    英文原文

    Still looking @ $IREN after it's rise to $30+. Reminds me of $NBIS following $CRWV's massive rise. There's nothing stopping $MARA, $RIOT, $CIFR, $CLSK, $HUT and others from pivoting from BTC into AI right? Might be a great investment opportunity. https://t.co/1HJSHsiPml

  19. $ETORO 利润三成来自加密,低位或有补涨潜力。

    鉴于 $ETORO 是一只新上市股票,它可能尚未像(比特币 -> $MSTR -> $COIN -> $MARA 等)那样与加密货币紧密关联。然而,$ETORO 37% 的利润来自加密货币,且目前处于低位,因此可能像其股价从 $61 飙升至 $76 的那天一样,有补涨空间。

    英文原文

    Given how ETORO is a new stock, it's likely not associated with Crypto yet like how (Bitcoin -&gt; $MSTR -&gt; $COIN -&gt; $MARA, etc). However, 37% of $ETORO's profits come from Crypto and it's at a low so might have some room to catch up like the day they spiked $61 -&gt; $76