全部推文

共 6399 条 · 第 61 / 214 页 · 滚到底自动加载更多

  1. 杂谈

    用日语感谢粉丝与日本社区。

    @beauty_oe 本当にありがとうございます!フォロワー20万人を達成できてとても嬉しいです!ポケモンのイラスト、大好きです。日本のコミュニティの皆様には本当に感謝しています!

    英文原文

    @beauty_oe 本当にありがとうございます!フォロワー20万人を達成できてとても嬉しいです!ポケモンのイラスト、大好きです。日本のコミュニティの皆様には本当に感謝しています!

  2. 个股论点 $Cerebras$GOOGL$OpenAI

    认为 Cerebras 在 35B 估值下仍有吸引力,但问题在 OpenAI。

    @C3PIOX 如果 Cerebras 的年化收入是 60-100 亿美元,而估值是 350 亿美元,这当然很有吸引力。 如果核心客户是 $GOOGL,我会买…… 问题在于,核心客户是 OpenAI。

    英文原文

    @C3PIOX $6-10B ARR is very attractive for Cerebras at $35B. If this were $GOOGL as the core customer id be buying… The issue is, this is OpenAi.

  3. 个股论点 $Cerebras$OpenAI$BIRD

    把 Cerebras 上市看成 OpenAI 外溢的典型案例。

    Cerebras 很快就要以 350 亿美元以上估值 IPO。 这就是 OpenAI 外溢效应的终极案例。 -> 几个月前 81 亿估值 -> Sam Altman 暗示 3 年 200-300 亿美元交易 -> 230 亿估值 -> 现在公开市场要到 350 亿以上。 如果 OpenAI 承诺 $BIRD 5 万亿美元的订单,就会突然让它变成一家 60 亿美元的公司吗? 短期也许还能撑一年……但如果 OpenAI 倒下,这不会有好结果。

    英文原文

    Cerebras soon to IPO at $35B+ valuation. This is the holy grail of OpenAi contagion. -> $8.1B valuation few months ago -> Sam Altman hints at $20-30B deal over 3 years. -> $23B valuation. -> Now it’s $35B+ to the public. If OpenAI promises $BIRD $5 trillion in orders, does it suddenly make it a $6 company? Might be fine for a year… but this is not going to end well if OpenAi goes down.

  4. 个股论点 $Shunsin

    说 Shunsin 波动更大,所以很多券商不让交易。

    @saso_equity 是的,Shunsin 的波动更大,所以很多券商都不允许交易。

    英文原文

    @saso_equity Yes there’s increased volatility on Shunsin, so many brokerages don’t allow trading.

  5. 杂谈

    说自己免费分享研究,不认同就别看。

    @KristaSoboh 哥们,我是在免费分享研究。如果你券商里没有,就直接往下刷就行,别说它对你没价值。

    英文原文

    @KristaSoboh Bro I’m sharing my research for free. If it’s not available on your brokerage, you can just keep scrolling rather than saying it’s worthless to you

  6. 供应链分析 $AVGO

    感叹本该买些,现在后悔它涨起来,因为它做 AVGO 激光模块

    @StrateGeee 啊,我本来应该买一点的……现在看着它涨上去有点后悔,因为他们给 $AVGO 做激光模块之类的东西。

    英文原文

    @StrateGeee Ah I should have bought some… I have regrets seeing it go up now since they do the laser modules and stuff for $AVGO

  7. 杂谈

    说自己没钱了。

    @yuntungshieh 我没钱了。

    英文原文

    @yuntungshieh I’m out of money

  8. 个股论点 $PCL

    说自己很看好 PCL,但光子板块仓位已经太重。

    @Yolo365247isme 我真的很喜欢 PCL,但我在 photonics 上已经配置得太多了。 不过只是想顺手分享一下我的想法。

    英文原文

    @Yolo365247isme I really liked PCL but have too much allocated to photonics right now. But just wanted to share my ideas anyway!

  9. 供应链分析 $PCL$AVGO

    看好 PCL Technologies 借助 AVGO 光子生态翻倍。

    我其实没有持仓,但前面已经给订阅者做过一些简短 DD。 我预计 PCL Technologies(4977)也会翻倍。 因为他们在 $AVGO 的 photonics 生态里负责组装、光学、测试等全部环节。 我记得我在它大概 4.5 亿美元市值的时候就提过这点? https://t.co/vmgilSKANV

    英文原文

    I actually don’t have positions but gave some slight DD away for subscribers earlier. I expect PCL Technologies (4977) to double as well. Since they’re doing everything in $AVGO photonics ecosystem for assembly, optical, testing. Think I mentioned this around ~$450M MC? https://t.co/vmgilSKANV

  10. 供应链分析 $Shunsin$Foxconn$NVDA$FN$ASX

    详细拆解 Shunsin 的 Foxconn 光学封装/组装定位与利润率提升。

    Shunsin(6451)。鸿海的光学封装/组装业务。 此前作为 OSAT 的毛利率只有 15-16%,但 CPO/1.6T 可能做到 30-35%,这会把整体利润率拉上去。 因为他们在 $NVDA 的 CPO 供应链里做更难的 FAU 光学对准。 和 $FN 或 $ASX 这些市值动辄几十亿美元的公司比呢? 这家公司现在才 14 亿美元市值,我个人推演的 2028 年 forward P/E 可能会从很低的水平压缩到个位数,因为鸿海会把订单转给它。 鸿海体量巨大,而且还能帮这家公司去风险。 我对它很有信心,觉得很快就会翻倍。 只是我认为几乎没人知道这家公司。

    英文原文

    Shunsin (6451). Foxconn’s optical packaging/assembly arm. Previously 15-16% gross margins as OSAT but CPO/1.6T could be 30-35%, which brings blended up. Since they’re doing harder FAU optical alignment in $NVDA CPO supply chains. Compared to $FN or $ASX that trades in the tens of billions? This trades at… $1.4B MC with, fwd 2028 p/e likely compresses to single digits from personal projections, as Foxconn passes orders to them. Foxconn is massive. And de-risks this company. Pretty high conviction this ends up doubling soon. Just nobody knows about this company imo.

  11. 杂谈

    说这个行业被做成了给散户提供退出流动性的赚钱机器。

    @JRichy6406 基本上,他们把它搞成了一个印钞机器 -> 给散户提供退出流动性。 或者只是把更多资金灌进被高估的代币里,好把价格抬上去。 他们完全忘了这个行业原本该往哪走。

    英文原文

    @JRichy6406 Basically, they turned it into a way for printing money -> exit liquidity on retail. Or just funneling more into overpriced tokens, just to raise the prices. Completely lost vision about where the industry is heading.

  12. 杂谈 $WLFI$CRCL

    说 WLFI 并不过时,只是没人知道发生了什么。

    不是的,它并不过时……只是大家都不知道到底发生了什么? 比如 $WLFI 就在那儿,因为他们原本是要做“让没银行服务的人也能接入金融”的(因为特朗普家族被银行去风险)。结果在代币融资之后就什么也不做了? 总得还有别的 $CRCL 之类的项目吧。

    英文原文

    No it's not obsolete... But just nobody knows what TF happened? $WLFI was there for example, because they set out to bank the unbanked (because Trump's family got de-banked). Then it just doesn't do anything after token raise -> sales? There's gotta be another $CRCL or others out there.

  13. 方法论 $HOOD$Hyperliquid$Bridge

    批评加密圈忘了区块链原本的用途。

    这感觉就像……对冲基金 / VC 突然忘了区块链本来是干什么的? 他们居然把数字资产变成了: 代币融资 -> 散户退出流动性,循环往复。 现在,没人再在乎“治理币”或 gas 代币了,因为那只是印钞后的更大傻瓜理论。 区块链最初的意义,是尽可能减少中间商,也顺带把费用降下来。 尽管如此: 1. 3 天 ACH 通道还在……虽然我们已经有 0 成本的支付通道。 2. 巨额 interchange 还在……虽然我们已经有 0 成本的支付通道。 3. 数字资产“信用卡”只是给 Visa/Mastercard 又包了一层更磨损的外壳。 4. 储蓄账户利率还是 0.3%,而现在法律还在试图堵住和稳定币相关的收益。 数字资产原本想做到的事,除了稳定币之外,几乎都没实现。 也许你们只是盲目追下一家 $HOOD / Hyperliquid(代币化、链上股票),或者盲目跟着 Ethereum,所以表现才会这么差。 重点不是靠代币价格上涨赚钱,再把 meme 币的癫狂变现。 而是要去资助真正有颠覆性的项目,比如 Bridge(稳定币出金/入金、interchange)之类。 这个圈子里绝大多数人毫无 alpha,因为他们都忘了它最初到底是为了什么。

    英文原文

    It's like... Hedge Funds/VCs suddenly forgot what blockchain was ever supposed to do? They somehow turned digital assets into: Token raise -> retail exit liquidity on repeat. Now, nobody cares anymore about "governance or gas" tokens since it's greater fools theory from printed money. The original point of blockchain is removing as many middlemen as possible, and as a byproduct, the fees. Despite all of this: 1. 3 Day ACH rails are still around... Even though we have payment rails for 0 cents. 2. Massive interchange is still around... despite having payment rails at 0 cents... 3. Digital Asset "Credit Cards" are just more friction-add wrappers around Visa/Mastercard. 4. Yields are still .3% in checking accounts and now laws are trying to bank stablecoin related yields. Very little that digital assets set out to do actually got accomplished, aside from Stablecoins? Maybe you all have bad performance by just blindly following the next L2 exchange token or blindly into Ethereum. It's not about making money from token prices going up + monetizing degeneracy from meme coins. It's to be funding any legitimate disruptors, like the next $HOOD/Hyperliquid (Tokenization, on-chain equities), Bridge (stablecoin off-ramps/intercharge), etc. 0 alpha from the vast majority of folks in that space, because everyone there lost vision on what it was originally supposed to do.

  14. 杂谈

    感谢正面评论,说做账号是为了免费分享想法。

    感谢你的正面评论!我开这个账号就是为了免费分享我的想法;如果它能帮到别人,我会很有成就感。 如果我的想法最后没对,我也能理解别人会有怨气…… 但如果它们都涨了 100-500%+,散户投资者不是应该庆祝,而不是贬低或者人身攻击吗? 这才是让我真正困惑的地方。

    英文原文

    Thanks for the positive comment! I made this account so I can just share my ideas for free and I get fulfillment if it helps others. I would understand the resentment if my ideas didn't turn out right... But if they go up 100-500%+, shouldn't retail investors be celebrating instead of downplaying it or going after personal attacks? That's what makes me genuinely confused.

  15. 业绩复盘 $AXTI$RPI$SOI$SIVE$AEHR

    回顾自己在 WSB 被封和多只名字被骂空的经历。

    一个有意思的事实:我在 WSB 子版块里因为 $AXTI 从 12 美元涨到 80 美元以上而被封了,原因是版主气得不行,因为它一直涨,而且后来证明我是对的。 像 $RPI 这种名字因为“meme stock”叙事被无休止地攻击,连 FT 和新闻媒体都这样……但最后还是翻倍了。 $SOI 之类的名字也被无穷无尽地骂成拉盘砸盘。 $SIVE 之类的名字也被无休止地攻击,带着一堆瑞典式的酸味。 $AEHR 之类的也一样。 还有 $SOI,也一直被人喷成“肯定别人比我先建仓了”。 我也不知道……只要你是第一个发现的人,就会招来一大堆仇恨评论。等它变成 50-100 亿美元市值、涨了 1000%+ 之后,大家才会说“哦,原来可以做多啊”。

    英文原文

    Fun fact I got banned on WSB subreddit after $AXTI went from $12 to $80+ because Mods got mad it kept going up and played out correctly. Names like $RPI got endless harassment over "meme stock" narratives. Including FT and news media... but it ended up doubling anyway. Names like $SOI, endless pump and dump harassment. Names like $SIVE, endless Swedish salt harassment. Names like $AEHR, endless harassment. Names like $SOI, endless harassment thinking someone else went long before I did. Idk... whenever you're first to something, it's just a ton of hate comments. And only after it's a $5-10B+ company after going up 1000%+ is it "okay" to go long.

  16. 列出自己年内成功翻倍数百倍的 15 只股票。

    很高兴听到这个! 我已经做多并写过 thesis 帖子的股票,大概有 15 只,今年回报达到了 100-1000%+? 1. $AXTI 2. $AAOI 3. $SIVEF 4. $LITE 5. $IQE 6. $AEHR 7. $CRCL 8. $EWY 9. Unimicron 10. Nitto Boseki 11. $OSS 12. $GDRZF 13. $RPI 14. $SOI 15. $ALRIB 还不算像 $TSEM 这种,接下来一个月也快要接近三位数回报的名字。 因为我在网上免费发想法,结果招来这么多仇恨,真的挺离谱。 也开始能理解为什么有些人干脆搞 2 万美元的付费墙,把信息卖给西方机构,而不是去帮那些酸溜溜的散户(尤其是欧洲那边)。 不过这些正面评论也让我更有动力继续发帖。

    英文原文

    Glad to hear it! I've went long and wrote thesis posts on about out 15 different stocks that hit 100-1000%+ YTD? 1. $AXTI 2. $AAOI 3. $SIVEF 4. $LITE 5. $IQE 6. $AEHR 7. $CRCL 8. $EWY 9. Unimicron 10. Nitto Boseki 11. $OSS 12. $GDRZF 13. $RPI 14. $SOI 15. $ALRIB Not including others like $TSEM that are about to hit triple digit returns too in a month. The amount of hate people like myself get for posting free ideas over the internet is pretty insane TBH. Starting to make sense why people just set up $20,000 paywalls and sell info to Western institutions instead of helping out salty retail investors (especially over in Europe). But helps me keep motivated to keep posting with these positive comments.

  17. 个股论点 $LWLG

    说看完评论后对 LWLG 的看法更负面了。

    @FrankMakrides 看完你的评论后我改主意了,现在对 $LWLG 的看法更偏负面了。

    英文原文

    @FrankMakrides Changed my mind after reading your comments, have a more negative opinion on $LWLG now.

  18. 个股论点 $HIMS

    说 Huberman 也认为 HIMS 会大涨。

    Huberman 的确说过 $HIMS 在今天这种走势里会一路上去…… 看到斯坦福教授怎么看公开市场股票,也挺有意思的。 https://t.co/jqVtpEaoGB

    英文原文

    Huberman did say $HIMS was set to soar… in this type of arc playing out today. Interesting to see takes from Stanford professors on public equities. https://t.co/jqVtpEaoGB

  19. 杂谈

    说希望对方几个月后证明自己错了。

    @Marketmakemkc 这也合理,几个月后希望你能证明我错了!

    英文原文

    @Marketmakemkc That’s fair, hope you prove me wrong in a few months time!

  20. 杂谈

    为自己发表意见道歉。

    @Noobverest 抱歉,我只是有个观点而已。

    英文原文

    @Noobverest I’m sorry for having an opinion

  21. 个股论点

    在旁观拉升后发表自己对 $6.5 的看法。

    @themissinglinks 6.5 美元。我只是一直在旁边看着它一路拉上去,想顺手说说我的看法。

    英文原文

    @themissinglinks $6.5. Just been watching the rally up on the sidelines, thought I’d throw my opinion out there

  22. 供应链分析 $NVDA$LWLG$TSEM

    认为富士康光学供应链比无营收试制公司更有价值。

    @StrateGeee 鸿海这边是活生生的……$NVDA 的光学供应链,负责封装、测试和组装…… 居然比一个没有收入的 $LWLG 和 $TSEM 之间的开发试验还便宜。

    英文原文

    @StrateGeee Foxconn’s live.. $NVDA optical supply chain for packaging, test, and assembly.. Is valued less than a development trial between no revenue $LWLG and $TSEM

  23. 供应链分析 $LWLG$RGTI$SIVEF$JBL$MRVL$NVDA

    质疑 LWLG 估值,拿 Shunsin 和 SIVEF 做对比。

    抱歉,但我越来越确信 $LWLG 就是光子领域里的当前 $RGTI。 我完全不懂……他们怎么会值 18 亿美元。 鸿海的光学业务 Shunsin,给 $NVDA 做 CPO 的封装、组装和测试…… 估值反而只有 14 亿美元? 而 $SIVEF 作为 $JBL 和 $MRVL 的激光源,前几天估值还只有它们的三分之一? 感觉像是傻钱机构因为一份开发测试协议,买错了名字。 我没有持仓,只是觉得困惑。

    英文原文

    Sorry but I’m convinced $LWLG is the current $RGTI of photonics. I have zero clue… How they’re valued at $1.8B. Foxconn’s optical arm Shunsin, for $NVDA CPO packaging, assembly, and testing… Is valued less at $1.4B? $SIVEF, the laser source for $JBL and $MRVL was 1/3rd their valuation earlier this week? Feels like dumb money institutions went into the wrong name off a development test agreement. I have no open positions, just confused

  24. 方法论

    说这些名字大概率还会继续冲,自己是在抢跑机构。

    @Lee_Trades 我提到的这些名字大概率还会继续往上冲。 三位数回报看起来很多……但那不是因为我个人在追 10 倍。 这更像是在一个超级周期最早期抢在机构前面。

    英文原文

    @Lee_Trades All of the names I’ve mentioned are likely to keep on running. The triple digit return looks like a lot… but it’s not cause I’m personally chasing 10x. This is what it feels like to frontrun institutions at the very beginning of a supercycle

  25. 个股论点

    说这不是 FOMO,而是美国人更懂需求和光子。

    @princebtc28 这不是 FOMO。美国人只是比欧洲那些普通散户和媒体更懂 hyperscaler 的需求和 photonics。 如果瑞典散户想把他们的前沿激光公司转给美国机构,然后错过上涨,那是他们自己的选择。

    英文原文

    @princebtc28 It’s not fomo. Americans just understand hyperscaler demand and photonics better than random retail and media in Europe. If Swedish retail want to transfer their frontier laser company over to American institutions and miss out on the upside, it’s their choice.

  26. 方法论

    建议写 16 个名字的 thesis 并高集中做多。

    @UntappedAlpha 给 16 个单独名字各写一篇 thesis 帖。 高集中度做多。 4 个月里让它们都涨 100-1000%+?其实很简单,说真的。

    英文原文

    @UntappedAlpha Write a thesis post on 16 individual names. Go long on them with high concentration. The have them all return 100-1000%+ in 4 months? Pretty simple tbh

  27. 供应链分析 $Shunsin$LWLG

    看好 Shunsin 翻倍,难接受其估值低于 LWLG。

    @TD_btc24 我很看好 Shunsin(6451)翻倍。很难接受鸿海的光学封装业务估值还低于 $LWLG,笑死。

    英文原文

    @TD_btc24 Pretty confident in Shunsin (6451) doubling. Hard to see Foxconn’s optical packaging arm valued less than $LWLG lol

  28. 业绩复盘 $SOI$ALRIB$RPI

    说 SOI 已是今年第 16 只翻倍股。

    哇,$SOI 现在已经成了我第 16 只…… 我今年写过的 mini thesis 里,已经有一只回报超过 100% 了。 最近两只是 $ALRIB 和 $RPI。 为什么我身边的一切都在翻倍? https://t.co/ttgmKWEhhU

    英文原文

    Wow $SOI is now the 16th name... I've done a mininthesis post on that returned over 100% Year to Date. The most recent two were $ALRIB and $RPI. Why does everything around me keep doubling? https://t.co/ttgmKWEhhU

  29. 杂谈

    说自己会继续拿着,等结果出来。

    @Andres17G @RayBraha 票还没出来,我个人还是继续拿着,等结果再看。不过显然我也不高兴。

    英文原文

    @Andres17G @RayBraha Votes aren’t out yet, I’m personally still holding until we see the results. But obviously not happy about it

  30. 业绩复盘 $SIVE

    原本想要 50%,结果市场给了 95%。

    @ehaibag 我本来还希望能有 50%……结果市场大概会在 1 周内给 $SIVE 95% 的涨幅。 https://t.co/PcRGZXq20F

    英文原文

    @ehaibag I was hoping for 50%… but guess markets will settle on 95% in 1 week with $SIVE https://t.co/PcRGZXq20F