全部推文
共 6775 条 · 第 190 / 226 页 · 滚到底自动加载更多
-
博主调侃在NBIS上因恐慌操作而亏损，自嘲得到反向祝福。
@foogleman1234 别担心，我们在 $NBIS 上省下了钱。我刚才有点恐慌，但我们得到了反向的 @jimcramer 的“祝福”。https://t.co/99NoI9EDfc
英文原文
@foogleman1234 Don't worry, we've saved on $NBIS. I was panicking for a bit but we got the blessing from the inverse @jimcramer. https://t.co/99NoI9EDfc
-
博主赞同另一位用户关于某事的准确描述。
@zhou_zay 哈哈，描述得很准确
英文原文
@zhou_zay lol accurate description
-
博主感叹Reddit用户巨额亏损，认为这是疯狂的市场底部反转信号。
今天到底发生了什么？ 看起来像是市场见底了，当Reddit用户损失六位数的毕生积蓄并陷入债务时。 这是我见证过的最疯狂且出人意料的市场反转之一。 https://t.co/vCahK6WhTI
英文原文
What... just happened today? Looks like a market bottom when users from Reddit lose 6 figures in life savings then go into debt. One of the most crazy and unexpected market reversals I've witnessed. https://t.co/vCahK6WhTI
-
期权到期引发波动，短期看算法，中长期看基本面。
明天有很多期权到期（如果你看 $NBIS 到 $META 等）。未平仓合约链(open interest chains)将被清洗。我想说从周一开始到1-2月，或者12月初会有复苏，但由于这是由算法驱动的，基本面没有太多实质性内容，不确定伟大的算法之神(algo gods)短期内会怎么做。中长期基本面更重要。
英文原文
lot of option expiration tomorrow (if you look at $NBIS to $META, etc). and open interest chains will get flushed. I want to say starting Monday into Jan-Feb, or maybe recovery in early December but since it's algorithmic driven with nothing too material to fundamentals, not sure what the great algo gods will do short term. Medium-long term fundamentals matter more.
-
NBIS 遭算法抛售大跌，作者认为基本面未变，跌幅不合理。
是的，全市场的反转让我措手不及。$NBIS 毫无理由地从 103 美元跌至 84 美元。Citadel 的 Rubner 表示，尽管 $NVDA 财报大幅超预期，但这纯粹是为了“去风险”目的的算法抛售。恰好明天有大量未平仓合约到期。撇开期权流向不谈，我认为因 25 个基点（bps）就出现 40% 的抛售是不合理的。“担心 AI 泡沫”或 25 个基点并不会如此根本性地改变基本面。
英文原文
Yeah market wide reversal caught me by surprise. $NBIS ended up dropping from $103 to $84 for little reason. Rubner from Citadel was saying it was a purely algorithmic selloff despite $NVDA massive earnings beat for "derisking" purposes. Just so happens tons and tons of open interest expiring tomorrow. Option flow aside, don't think a 40% selloff is warranted for 25bps. "Fearing an AI bubble" or 25 BPS doesn't change fundamentals that instrumentally.
-
质疑Circle $400估值过高，指出其利息收入需与Coinbase分成。
关于 $CRCL - 人们忽略了它与 $COIN 共享 50% 的利息收入，而 Coinbase 在其平台上独享这部分收入的 100%。 如果 Circle 股价达到 $400，其市值将达到 920 亿美元，这超过了 Coinbase（690 亿美元）。而 Coinbase 还有交易所交易收入、ETF 托管收入等。 我同意 $150 的估值，但 $400 太牵强了，除非 $USDT 突然消失。
英文原文
So for $CRCL - people are missing it's 50% interest revenue sharing with $COIN and Coinbase has 100% of that revenue split on its platform. Circle at $400 would be a $92B marketcap which is more than Coinbase ($69B). And Coinbase has exchange trading revenue, ETF custody revenue, etc. I'd agree with $150 but $400 is a stretch lol unless $USDT suddenly disappeared.
-
CIFR获谷歌8.3亿长约，风险降低，看好下月股价破22美元。
天哪，$CIFR 刚刚通过 Fluidstack 与 $GOOGL 签署了一份价值 8.3 亿美元、为期 10 年的合同。下个月股价更可能突破 22 美元以上，而非低于 10 美元。长期超大规模云服务商（Hyperscaler）的收入可见性很高，因此风险已大幅降低。唯一的缺点是，与全栈产品（Full-stack offerings）相比，其收入爬坡速度较慢，且由于资产负债表上持有比特币，受到 BTC 价格拖累。
英文原文
bruh, $CIFR just signed a $830m 10y contract with $GOOGL through Fluidstack. More likely $22+ next month than sub $10. Long-term hyperscaler revenue visibility, so it's pretty de-risked. Just slower revenue ramp compared to full-stack offerings + BTC price drag since it holds Bitcoin on its balance sheet.
-
分析VRT受益于AI基建电力瓶颈，认为其将跑赢大盘，NVT风险回报更优。
哈哈，关于股票代码的评论太多了，无法一一回复。关于 $VRT，它是数据中心建设的高贝塔敞口。Q3 营收 26 亿美元，同比增长 29%，指引 FY 中值为 102 亿美元。整体利润率增长，例如 Q3 调整后营业利润增长 43% 至 5.96 亿美元。后者可能表明，由于电力基础设施组件严重短缺和电网容量限制，其拥有类似内存行业的定价权。 $NVT 在当前市值下（24.5 倍 EV/EBITDA，对比 33 倍）可能具有更好的风险调整后回报。但除此之外，能源并非我的专业领域，因此我无法像对 neoclouds 或金融科技那样提供详细细致的观点。 不过，我可以说 Vertiv 在 AI 基础设施建设和电力供应约束的背景下，凭借其角色（例如与 nvda 合作的冷却和 800vdc 电力），方向上应该会跑赢大盘。
英文原文
lol there's a lot of ticker comments, can't respond to every one. So for $VRT it's a high beta exposure to DC buildout, from Q3 earnings $2.6B revenue 29% y/y, guided FY $10.2B midpoint, overall margins grew eg. adjusted operating profit increased 43% to $596 million in Q3. The latter probably indicates better pricing power like memory sector from a severe shortage of power infrastructure components and grid capacity limitations. $NVT might be better risk-adjusted return at current marketcaps (24.5x EV/EBITDA), vs. 33x. But that aside, energy not my field of expertise so I can't give detailed nuanced opinions like neoclouds or fintech. However, I can probably say Vertiv directionally should be outperform due to backdrop of AI infra buildout + power supply constraints and it's role (eg. cooling, 800vdc power that they're doing with nvda)
-
批评对方跳过量化论点进行人身攻击，强调讨论应基于实质内容。
我一直专注于量化论点，甚至写了一份回复来帮助你们理解产能比较的细微差别+在回复中包含了$IREN 的看好论点。但跳过所有内容然后进行人身攻击，比如“操纵读者以拉升股价”来否定一个论点，对于讨论来说毫无实质意义。
英文原文
I've been focusing on quantitative points and even wrote out a response to help you understand capacity comparison nuances + included an $IREN favored argument in the reply. But just skipping over everything then going into personal attacks like "gaslight readers to pump" to dismiss a point has no substance for a discussion.
-
澄清NBIS与IREN容量对比逻辑，反驳“文字混乱”论，强调前置容量价值。
重新阅读关于 $NBIS 和 $IREN 的表格及要点可能会有所帮助，而不是跳过并因为觉得这是“混乱的文字沙拉”就否定定量分析。 本着善意，为了帮助你理解：表格有三行。 - 当前已连接容量 - 2026年指导/预期已连接容量 - 指导签约容量。 这是关于将已获电力转化为运营数据中心容量（截至2026年底）或各公司签约容量指导的“苹果对苹果”（同等条件）比较。这与财报中的毛利率正常化不同。 因此，$IREN 1.4 GW 与 $NBIS 1 GW 的比较，或指导签约容量的比较，是各公司截至2026年底预期指导的同等条件比较。 3 GW 与 2.5 GW 的比较是指导数据，且是正确的。唯一的语义细微差别在于“已获、并网组合”与“预期签约扩张目标”（我之前用括号注明了前者），如果我想更清楚，本应再加一行。然而，你的说法并不能否定两种指导容量的比较。 $IREN 多头应该争论的细微差别是前置容量的价值（例如 $IREN 上半年 1.4 GW 对比 $NBIS 下半年）。不要说因为内容太长无法阅读 -> 所以无法比较。
英文原文
Might be helpful to read the table and the points again on $NBIS and $IREN rather than skipping it and dismissing something quantitative because you think it's "convoluted word salad". So coming in with good faith, just to help you understand: there's three rows. - current connected capacity - guided/expected connected capacity 2026 - guided contracted capacity. This is an apples to apples comparison regarding converting secured power into operational data center capacity by the end of 2026 or guidance for contracted capacity for each company. This is not the same as gross margin normalization on earnings reports. So, the comparison of $IREN 1.4 GW vs $NBIS 1 GW, or guided contracted capacity is an apples-to-apples comparison of each company's expected guidance by the end of 2026. The comparison of 3 GW to 2.5 GW was guidance and is correct. The only semantic nuance is "secured, grid-connected portfolio" vs. "expected contracted expansion target" which I put the earlier in parenthesis, and if I wanted to be extra clear, I should added another row. However, what you're saying doesn't dismiss the comparison of both guided capacities. The nuance $IREN bulls you should be arguing is the value of frontloading capacity (eg. $IREN 1.4 GW H1 vs H2 $NBIS). Not saying that something is too long to read -> you can't compare.
-
因执行风险及融资压力降级$IREN，维持$NBIS跑赢大盘评级。
我的措辞非常严谨。你在阅读关于“引导性签约容量”的讨论时，跳过了“预期”一词。 因此，我再次重申上述观点，但提供更详细的解释： $IREN 最初的护城河是吉瓦(GW)级容量+垂直整合。$NBIS 的护城河是全栈(Full-stack)。 然而，Nebius 在长期吉瓦级容量上实现了与原本被认为是 $IREN 最大护城河的平价。 以下是有帮助的解释： - 短期：$IREN 0.66 GW 已连接 vs. $NBIS 22 GW 已连接。目前，$IREN 拥有更多前置容量。 - 中期：$NBIS 和 $IREN 之间的已连接电力差距正在缩小，$IREN 2026年为 1 GW，Nebius 为 1.4 GW。 - 长期：$IREN 规划 3 GW 电力扩张，$NBIS 规划 2.5 GW 签约电力扩张，Nebius 在已连接电力方面实现长期平价。 Nebius 管理层还将容量预期提高了 150%，并且有很大可能再次增加，以超越其他新云(Neocloud)公司。 此外，$IREN 最终转向全栈 IAAS 而非风险较低的托管(Colo)($CIFR, $WULF)，以追求更高的收入和利润率潜力，正如他们的 ER 所述。 但考虑到 $CRWV + $ORCL 在软件/编排方面的建设难度，与拥有现成且即插即用现有堆栈的 $NBIS 相比，$IREN 的新转型执行风险极高。 如果 $IREN 能做好这一点，其上行潜力巨大，但由于执行风险以及为 AI 云转型的容量变现所需融资面临的信贷收紧，我已将其降级。 如上所述，Nebius 拥有更大且多元化的客户群，这增强了收入可见性和防御性，因此我维持对 $NBIS 的跑赢大盘评级，因其具有非对称上行潜力。
英文原文
I'm very precise with my wording. You skipped over "expected" while reading discussions about guided contracted capacity. So reiterating what I've said above but with a longer explanation: $IREN's original moat was GW capacity + vertical integration. $NBIS's moat was full-stack. However, Nebius achieved long-term parity with GW capacity that was originally thought to be $IREN's biggest moat. Here's a helpful explanation: - Near term $IREN .66 GW connected vs. 22 GW connected with $NBIS. Today, $IREN has more frontloaded capacity. - Mid-term, The connected power argument is closing between $NBIS and $IREN with 1 GW 2026 for IREN and 1.4 GW for Nebius. - Long term, $IREN projects 3 GW power expansion, $NBIS projects 2.5 GW contracted power expansion with Nebius achieving longer term parity with connected power. Nebius management also raised capacity expectations by 150%, and there's a large chance it increases again to exceed other Neocloud companies. On top of that $IREN ended up pivoting to full-stack IAAS instead of lower-risk colo ( $CIFR, $WULF ) for higher revenue potential due to "higher revenue and margin potential" as per their ER. But looking at $CRWV + $ORCL buildout difficulty with software/orchestration, this immensely raises execution risk for a new pivot with $IREN compared to $NBIS, which has it down + plug and play with existing stack. $IREN has high upside potential if they get this right, but due to execution risk and credit tightening required for future financing for capacity monetization for their AI cloud pivot, I've downgraded it. Nebius also has a much larger diversified client base as mentioned above for both revenue visibility + defensibility, which is why I maintain outperform on $NBIS due to asymmetrical upside.
-
深度解析9只个股基本面与目标价，指导散户建立独立估值模型。
基于权益排名表： 以下是对每只股票的深入分析，以及我如何重新调整投资组合以利用市场重置： · $NBIS 现价 $92，目标价 $400 / 1年 · $RKLB 现价 $43，目标价 $500 / 5年 · $CRCL 现价 $72，目标价 $150 / 8个月 · $ALAB 现价 $143.4，目标价 $250 / 6个月 · $SNAP 现价 $8.1，目标价 $22 / 1年 · $CIFR 现价 $14.8，目标价 $28 / 6个月 · $RDDT 现价 $185，目标价 $275 / 8个月 · $SMCI 现价 $34，目标价 $55 / 6个月 · $HIMS 现价 $35，目标价 $60 / 6个月 此顺序基于发布时的持仓集中度权重，以及基于现有信息对中型市值（$50亿+）板块的内部目标价推测。 以下是每只股票及目标价时间框架的深入拆解，以及“定性”理由： 1. Nebius ($NBIS)：市值 $230亿。极度低估且与基本面脱节。 $70-90亿远期年度经常性收入(ARR)，20-30%息税摊销前利润(EBIT)，来自 Shopify、埃森哲、Cursor、外国政府的企业合同，以及来自 Meta 和微软的超大规模客户合同，为 Nebius 提供了收入可见性。拥有 $48亿+现金，使其免受影响数据中心的信贷紧缩影响。预计 2026 年签约容量达 2.5 GW，可与许多其他公司（如 $IREN 的 2.8 GW）媲美，并击败许多关于容量/电力的论点。由于其许多投资组合公司支持 Tesla 和 Anthropic 等公司，它也具有更高的增长潜力（想想 $MSFT 及其投资组合公司带来的长期防御性）。 此外，随着 $NVDA 第四季度业绩爆发，Jensen 澄清了反对 GPU 折旧的论点，这有助于提升数据中心板块情绪。 1年目标价 $400，基于远期收入/利润率估值达 $1000亿+。 2. Rocketlab ($RKLB)：市值 $220亿。短期高估，长期潜力低估。 Rocketlab 是我与比特币并列的最高确信度5年长线标的。在太空领域，并非赢家通吃，我维持 $3500-5000亿长期目标价以匹配 SpaceX 的最新估值/能力。 目前它被高估。但从纯技术角度看，构建可重复使用火箭构成了惊人且具防御性的护城河，我们正处于其端到端太空产品大规模商业化（可能在 ~2028 年）的早期阶段。 然而，市场正在计入 Flatlite 商业化（如 Starlink）和中程有效载荷（SpaceX Falcon 9）的远期增长。市场也计入远期增长，但对于 Rocketlab 而言，关键在于未来有多远。这始终是一个坚实的买入机会，取决于你对公司执行的耐心程度。 3. Circle ($CRCL) - 市值 $160亿，低估。 对于 Circle，自其市值 $500亿以来我就看空，建议做空 Circle，做多 Coinbase，因为 $COIN 与 Circle 有 50% 的收入分成。 此前因流通股本数字和财报后/12月2日巨大的内部人锁定期导致抛售（类似 $BULL）而被高估。流通股本动态很重要，像 Cathie Wood 这样的 ETF 经理似乎不理解（因此我的警告）。 但现在我们达到了合理的估值水平。我预计 USDC 商业化将继续，鉴于数字资产市场的监管重点，我看到 $CRCL 将接管 Tether 的大部分市值。 话虽如此，一旦我们看到内部人股份重新分配给机构和长期持有者，计入稳定币交易量增长，它完全值得 $300亿+的市值定价。 4. Astera Labs ($ALAB) - 市值 $220亿，估值合理 ALAB 是我中期高确信度选股之一，因为 Mag7 采用其连接技术用于数据中心建设。 增长极高，利润率类似 $NVDA，约为 ~74%，最新估算：$2.3亿/季度（同比增长 101%）。我的论点是，如果 Mag7 依赖某家公司（$NVDA 用于 GPU，NBIS、IREN、CIFR 用于 DC AI 云建设），该公司将连续几个季度大幅超出预期，我们正看到这一点。 尽管全面超出业绩预期，Astera 最近从 $250 抛售回 $140 区间，这提供了一个良好的买入机会。 我维持中期目标价 $250，以在 NVDA 业绩后及 Anthropic $400亿 DC 到 $GOOGL 在德克萨斯州 $500亿 DC + 连接需求创纪录的数据中心建设后恢复。 5. Snapchat ($SNAP) 市值 $130亿，低估。 $SNAP 是我最不喜欢的股票和 CEO 之一（抱歉 Evan）。 然而，我无法反驳基本面的变化。我最近论点帖子的 TLDR 是，他们正在削减来自存储 10 年前记忆/视频的巨大运营支出膨胀，如果你查看他们的 GCP 托管费用，这会侵蚀利润率。 现在他们既减少了该 OPex 成本，又从中增加了收入。我们还有与 Perplexity 的 AI 交易，增加了 $4亿+的额外收入流，如 RDDT。 然而，短期内由于相对于 AI 公司的表现不佳，它正遭受税务收割。在 2026 年 Q1，我预计市场将开始大幅计入新的基本面，该公司将大幅超出预期。 话虽如此，随着市场计入新动态，我预计从此处 1 年内有超过 200%+ 的上涨空间。 5. CIFR ($CIFR) - 市值 $50亿，低估 $CIFR 是 Neocloud 板块中我最喜欢的第二只股票。据记忆，其资产负债表上持有大量比特币，并受到 BTC 价格从 $120k 跌至 $90k 的实质性影响。 然而，我预计随着级联保证金清算结束且机构以低价买入比特币，加密资产价格将在几个月内恢复。 Nebius 位居榜首，因为它拥有完整的 AI-云价值链，具有更高的收入潜力和更强的回报，尽管这迫使他们处理编排、软件和 GPU 生命周期风险，而不是坚持托管。 然而，$CIFR 避免了整个风险面，并拥有 AMZN 和 GOOGL 的支持作为长期收入锚点。它也免受 GPU 采购、管理和折旧的影响。 对于 CIFR 的经济模型，我们获得了一个基于超大规模客户空间、电力和冷却的高利润率、年金结构。经风险调整后，它是该组中最安全的名称之一。但权衡是上涨空间受限。像 10 年、15 年这样的长期租赁减缓了收入爬坡，并相对于从 $1.45亿季度收入到一年内 $21亿的全栈 Neocloud 运营商（如 NBIS）削弱了回报。 话虽如此，一旦市场计入 $AMZN、$GOOGL Fluidstack 收入且比特币价格恢复，我维持 1 个月后的 $28 目标价。 6. Reddit ($RDDT) - 估值适中 来自 WSB 子版块 Wendy's 垃圾桶的我，自然对这个平台有偏见。 然而，Reddit 最初从 $270 的抛售是由于对 ChatGPT 引用的担忧，这是不重要的。现在，最新数据显示引用回来了，但 Reddit 的价格仍停留在 $185（远低于该数字）+ 部分由于宏观因素。 Reddit 是最不臃肿、高利润的社交媒体公司之一。由于年轻和年长受众的网络效应的长期防御性（与 Snap 9亿+ MAU 主要为年轻一代相比），它将长存。 我预计 RDDT 将通过收购（如 $HOOD 交易所）扩大货币化途径，得益于其巨大的自由现金流(FCF)和盈利能力，或者像 Facebook 最初收购 WhatsApp、Instagram、构建 Messenger 一样。这是一只低风险、高增长的股票，因此我维持 8 个月后的 $275 目标价。 7. SMCI ($SMCI) - 低估，市值 $200亿。 $200亿市值是个笑话。无话可说。他们正在实现 $50亿季度收入（当然利润率较低）。然而，市场正在计入公司收入下降。 SMCI 将大部分积压订单推迟到 2026 年 Q2，这与 Neoclouds 到 Mag7 客户的许多数据中心建设相一致。 他们预计明年收入同比增长 50%+，至少 $360亿收入，但鉴于 NVDA 业绩爆发带来的数据中心建设，我预计服务器机架公司如 $DELL 和 SMCI 将在 2026 年 Q2 表现优异。 这就是为什么我利用当前季度的收入滞后延迟，并分配 6 个月后的 $55 目标价。 8. Hims and Her Health ($HIMS) - 低估（市值 $80亿） 个人而言，我仅将 HIMS 用于短期交易突破。我一直不长期持有高于 $50 的股票。 然而，回到 $35，它重置了今年大部分的增长，但收入同比增长 49% 至 $5亿，并产生大量自由现金流。 最被低估的叙事是 Zava 收购。这为 HIMS 平台增加了 130万+用户，并使公司能够扩展到欧盟市场。 类似于 META 收购 Instagram 等公司，扩大基础+货币化，我预计 HIMS 将对 Zava 做同样的事情 + 市场正在计入当前的 Zava 估算数字。 这可能是我信心最低的股票，尤其是 CEO 在离开后出售股份，在 $70 时的 SS 帖子让我味道不好 👀。 但话虽如此，这是一个在 6 个月时间内反弹至 $60 的好机会。 希望你喜欢我的观点。有很多关于价格的帖子，但我试图留下更定性的拆解（+ 部分定量，但省略很多技术内容以便阅读），以帮助散户建立自己的确信度和理解。 建立理解对于创建你自己的内部估值模型很重要，而不是盲目跟随 FinX 发帖人 + 当股价暂时下跌时投降。 如果你留下你的投资组合+集中度，我很乐意讨论更多。
英文原文
Based on the equity ranking table: Here's a deeper analysis of each stock, alongside how I reposition my portfolio to capitalize on the market reset: · $NBIS at $92, PT $400 / 1Y · $RKLB at $43, PT $500 / 5Y · $CRCL at $72, PT $150 / 8M · $ALAB at $143.4, PT $250 / 6M · $SNAP at $8.1, PT $22 / 1Y · $CIFR at $14.8, PT $28 / 6M · $RDDT at $185, PT $275 / 8M · $SMCI at $34, PT $55 / 6M · $HIMS at $35, PT $60 / 6M This is in order of concentration weighting from when posted and internal PT speculation based on existing information for mid-cap ($5B+) sections. Here’s a deeper breakdown on each one and PT timeframe, and a “qualitative”why: 1. Nebius ( $NBIS ): $23B marketcap. Incredibly undervalued and detached from fundamentals. $7-9B forward ARR, 20-30% EBIT, enterprise contracts from Shopify, Accenture, Cursor, foreign governments and hyperscaler contracts from Meta and Microsoft give Nebius revenue visibility. With $4.8B+ in cash, it's isolated from credit tightening affecting data centers. With 2.5 GW expected capacity contracted 2026, it rivals many others eg. $IREN at 2.8 GW, and defeats many of the capacity/power arguments. With many portfolio companies powering companies like Tesla and Anthropic, it also has higher growth potential (think $MSFT with its portfolio companies for longer defensibility). We also had stellar $NVDA earnings going into Q4 with their blowout, Jensen clarifying arguments against GPU depreciation, which helps with DC sector sentiment. $400 1 year price target, $100B+ valuation given forward revenue/margins. 2. Rocketlab ( $RKLB ): $22B marketcap. Overvalued current term, undervalued long term potential. Rocketlab is my highest conviction 5Y long alongside Bitcoin. With Space, it's not winner takes all, and I've maintained $350-500B long term PT to match SpaceX’s most recent valuation/capabilities. As of now, it's overvalued. But it's an incredible + defensible moat from purely a technological standpoint building reusable rockets and we're early in terms of commercialization of their end-to-end space products at scale (likely ~2028). However, we're pricing in forward growth with Flatlite commericalization (eg. Starlink), and medium-lift payloads (SpaceX Falcon 9). The market prices in forward growth as well but it’s more about how long in the future with Rocketlab. It's always a solid buy, depending on how patient you are with company execution. 3. Circle ( $CRCL ) - $16B marketcap, undervalued. With Circle, I've been bear posting it since it was a $50B marketcap, saying short Circle, long Coinbase, given $COIN has 50% revenue sharing with Circle. It was overvalued due to float numbers and massive insider lockups 2-3 days after earnings/Dec 2nd led to a sell-off (like $BULL). Float dynamics matter a lot that ETF managers like Cathie Wood seem to not understand (hence my warnings). But now we're reaching respectable valuation numbers. I expect USDC commercialization to continue and given a regulatory focus in the digital asset market, I see $CRCL taking over a lot of Tether's marketcap. That being said, it's well deserving of a $30B+ marketcap pricing in stablecoin volume growth once we start seeing insider shares redistributed to institutions and long term holders. 4. Astera Labs ( $ALAB ) - $22B marketcap, reasonable valuation ALAB was one of my mid-term high conviction picks, due to Mag7 adoption of connectivity for datacenter buildout. Incredibly high growth and $NVDA-like margins sitting at ~74%, latest er: $230m/q (101% Y/Y growth). My thesis was that if Mag7 is dependent on a company ($NVDA for GPUs) ( NBIS, IREN, CIFR for DC AI cloud buildout), the company will blow away expections quarter after quarter, and we're seeing this. There's been a recent sell-off on Astera from $250 back to $140 marks, depsite beating earning expectations across the board and this presents a good buying opportunity. I maintain a medium term PT $250 for recovery after NVDA earnings and record-high DC buildout from Antrophic's $40B DC to $GOOGL's $50B DC in Texas + connectivity demand. 5. Snapchat ( $SNAP ) $13B marketcap, undervalued. $SNAP is one of my least favorite stocks and CEO's (sorry Evan). However, I can't argue with fundamental changes. A TLDR of my most recent thesis post was that they're cutting their massive opex bloat from memories/videos stored 10 years ago and if you look into their GCP hosting fees, it's cutting in margins. Now they're both reducing that OPex cost and increasing revenue from that. We also have AI deals with perplexity adding $400m+ additional revenue streams like RDDT. However, short term it's suffering from tax-harvesting due to underperformance this year relative to AI companies. In 2026 Q1, I expect the market to start pricing in the new fundamentals Hard. and for this company to beat expectation soundly. That being said I expect over a 200%+ upside 1Y from here with the market pricing in the new dynamics. 5. CIFR ( $CIFR ) - Undervalued at $5B marketcap $CIFR is my second favorite stock in the Neocloud sector. From memory, it holds a lot of Bitcoin on its balance sheet and is materially affected by the selloff in BTC prices from $120k to $90k. However I expect crypto asset prices to recover in a few months once cascading margin liqudations finish and instituions buy-in Bitcoin at low prices. Nebius is top because it owns the full AI-cloud value chain for higher revenue potential and stronger returns, even though it forces them to handle orchestration, software, and GPU lifecycle risk instead of sticking to colocation. However, $CIFR because it avoids that entire risk surface and has backing from AMZN and GOOGL for long term revenue anchors. It also stays insulated from GPU procurement, management, and depreciation. For CIFR's economics we get a a high-margin, annuity structure built on space, power, and cooling for hyperscalers. Risk-adjusted, it’s one of the safest names in the group. But the trade-off is capped upside Long leases like 10Y, 15Y slow the revenue ramp and mute the payoff relative to full-stack Neocloud operators like NBIS that go from $145m quarterly revenue to $2.1B in a year. That being said I maintain a $28 PT in 1 month once market prices in $AMZN, $GOOGL Fluidstack revenue and Bitcoin prices recover. 6. Reddit ( $RDDT ) - Moderate valuation Coming from the Wendy's dumpsters on WSB subreddit, I am naturally biased toward this platform. However, the initial sell-off of Reddit at $270 was due to fears over ChatGPT citations, which was immaterial. Now, recent data shows that citations are back, but Reddit's price still sits at $185 (way below that number) + partly due to macro. Reddit is one of the least bloated, highly profitable social media companies. And it's here to stay due to long term defensibility of the network effect of both younger + older audiences (compared to Snap 900m+ MAU of mostly younger generation). I expect RDDT to scale up monetization avenues through acquisitions like $HOOD (exchanges) due to their massive FCF and profitability or how Facebook originally acquired WhatsApp, Instagram, built out messenger. It's a low-risk, high growth stock, which is why I maintain a $275 PT in 8 months. 7. SMCI ( $SMCI ) - Undervalued, $20B marketcap. $20B marketcap is a joke. Nothing else to say. They're doing $5B quarterly revenue (off lower-margins for sure). However, market is pricing in the company revenue dropping. SMCI quoted majority of the backlog delay to Q2 2026, which aligns with a lot of the DC buildout from Neoclouds to Mag7 customers. They expect revenue to grow 50%+ Y/Y next year, with at least $36 billion revenue, but judging from DC buildout from blowout NVDA earnings, I expect server rack companies like $DELL and SMCI to outperform Q2 2026. This is why I'm taking advantage of revenue lag delays from the current quarter and assigning a $55 PT in 6 months time. 8. Hims and Her Health ( $HIMS) - Undervalued ( $8B marketcap) Personally, I've used HIMS just for short term trading breakouts. And I've been one to not long-term hold the stock above $50. However, back at $35, it's reset most of the year's growth but grew revenue 49% Y/Y to $500m and is producing a good amount of FCF. The most under-priced narrative is the Zava acquisition. This adds 1.3M+ users to the HIMS platform and allows the company to expand to the EU market. Similar to how META acquires companies like Instagram, grows its base + monetizes, I expect HIMS to do the same with Zava + market is pricing in current est. Zava numbers. It's probably my least confident stock out of the bunch, especially leaving me with a bad taste with the CEO selling shares after leaving 👀 on SS posts back at $70. But that being said it's a great rebound opportunity to $60 in a 6 month timeframe. Hope you enjoyed my perspective. There's a lot of x at price posts, but I try to leave a more qualitative breakdown (+ part quantitative but leave out a lot of technical for easier reading) to help retail develop their own conviction and understanding. Building understanding is important to create internal valuation models yourself rather than blindly following along FinX posters + capitulating when stock prices temporarily drop. Happy to discuss more if you drop your own portfolio + concentrations.
-
不建议做空$NBIS看涨期权，MSCI流入及机构吸筹预示反弹。
同意，在股价下跌35%且财报大爆后，虽然期权已接近价内(ITM)，但此时做空$NBIS的看涨期权(CC)并非明智之举。 即将迎来众多催化剂，例如4天内MSCI指数将带来数亿至十亿美元级别的资金流入。相对于市值/流通盘而言，这一规模极大。 此外，AI板块的涨势在12月前依然完好，且过去两周做市商的对冲操作带来了机械性的向上资金流。既然散户已投降触底，且机构据实时指标已积累约50%的流通盘（尽管官方13F文件显示为44-46%），随着70-90亿美元年度经常性收入(ARR)预期的基本面匹配，可能会迎来一波有趣的上涨行情。
英文原文
agreed, not a good idea to write $NBIS CC's though so close to ITM on a 35% drop + blowout earnings. There's too many catalysts coming up like few hundred - low billion inflow from MSCI in 4 days. This is extremely large relative to marketcap/float. Then we have AI rally in-tact in time for December and mechanical flows upward from all the dealer hedging downward the past two weeks. Now that we've hit the bottom with retail capitulation and institution managed to accumulate ~50% of the float (according to some live metrics) was ~44-46% from official 13F filings though, might be a fun rally upward to match fundamentals from $7-9B ARR projections.
-
NVDA财报暗示需求加速，利好CIFR等供应链个股。
@soulbiri1 是的，像 $CIFR 这样的股票盘后上涨了 17%。 这并不意味着开盘后价格能守住，但市场有时只需要一个借口来反弹。 从 $NBIS 到 $CIFR 的基本面依然完好，但 $NVDA 的财报只是指向需求加速。 https://t.co/oZqWb7jrL7
英文原文
@soulbiri1 Yeah stuff like $CIFR is up 17% after hours. Doesn’t mean the price will hold market open, but market just needs an excuse for things to rally sometimes. Fundamentals are already in-tact for $NBIS to $CIFR but $NVDA earnings just point toward accelerated demand. https://t.co/oZqWb7jrL7
-
感叹英伟达在巨大市值下仍保持惊人增长。
@harjaprama76404 是的，$NVDA 的增长势头确实惊人，尤其是考虑到它的市值，哈哈。
英文原文
@harjaprama76404 Yeah $NVDA growth is wild, especially at their market cap lol
-
澄清报告中提及的时间为2026年Q4而非今年。
@Perugius__ @zackslab 哦，我在那份报告中提到的2026年第四季度（Q4 2026）是指2026年年初的第四季度，而不是今年的第四季度。
英文原文
@Perugius__ @zackslab oh I've been talking about Q4 in 2026 not Q4 from this year in that reports early 2026
-
分析AI基础设施供应商来自微软、Meta及企业客户的强劲收入与增长潜力。
$194亿 $MSFT 5年，$38.8亿/年 / 4 = $9.7亿。 $30亿 $META 5年，$6亿/年 / 4 = $1.5亿 这仅仅是两个超大规模云服务商(hyperscaler)的合同。他们的核心业务是企业客户，如 Shopify、Cursor、埃森哲(Accenture)以及政府等。（例如今年年化经常性收入(ARR)为$11亿，增长非常迅速）。 仅来自 Meta/MSFT 的季度收入为$11.2亿，来自企业客户的约$10亿/季度，再加上更多带有互联网关(GW)容量的合同。
英文原文
$19.4B $MSFT 5 years $3.88B/year / 4 = $970m. $3B $META 5 years, $600M/year /4 = $150m That's just two hyperscaler contracts. Their core business are enterprises like Shopify, Cursor, Accenture + Governments and so on. (eg. $1.1B ARR this year, growing very rapidly). $1.12B/quarter from just Meta/MSFT alone, ~1B/quarter from enterprise clients + more contracts with connected GW capacity.
-
调侃部分博主将无关现象误读为看涨信号，但表示对OP仅为初次互动。
@Spiralout_one @AndreasSteno 是的……在和一些 X 账号交流后，他们能看到街上的绿灯，然后就说那是看涨信号。 不过我是第一次和 OP 互动，我相信这只是一点小小的疏忽。
英文原文
@Spiralout_one @AndreasSteno yeah... after talking to some X accounts, they can see a green light on the street and then say that's a bullish signal. First time interacting with OP though, I'm sure it's just a slight oversight.
-
Nebius股价严重低估，若市场认可2026年指引，现价应超140美元。
首先，它在94美元的价格下被极度低估。除非第一季度出现大量数据中心烧毁的情况，否则当前的股价才显得合理。 然而，若要符合我400美元的目标价，$NBIS 需要严格执行当前的指引，例如向2.5 GW产能迈进，实现1 GW产能并网，以及达成营收预测。 我们预计 $NBIS 在2026年第四季度的单季营收将达到21亿美元，这种增长简直令人难以置信。 市场已经计入了远期增长，但关键在于它计入了多远的未来。 对于Nebius而言，市场就像蒙着双眼。如果市场认真对待2026年的预测，股价现在轻松就能交易在140美元以上。
英文原文
For starters it's incredibly undervalued at $94. Q1 would need to have many DCs burn down for it to justify current prices. However, for it to be in line with my $400 PT, $NBIS needs to be executing current guidance eg.moving toward 2.5 GW capacity, 1GW capacity connected, revenue projections. We're expecting $2.1B/quarter 2026 Q4 for $NBIS which is absolutely mindblowing growth. Market prices in forward growth, but it's more of how long in the future it prices in. For Nebius, it's like it's wearing blindfolds. Stock should be easily trading $140+ right now if markets take 2026 projections seriously.
-
个股基本面优于宏观，NBIS强劲基本面使回调成买入良机。
因为个股基本面比宏观更重要。 $ETH、$SOL 等加密市场是另一回事，存在连锁的50倍杠杆保证金清算，但股票有自由现金流(FCF)/盈利支撑市值。 以 $NBIS 为例，当预期年度经常性收入(ARR)从20亿美元增至80亿美元，拥有来自 $META 和 $MSFT 的220亿美元+合同积压，且EBIT利润率达20-30%时，25个基点的降息并不会导致股价下跌30%。 如果盈利开始不及预期+预期收入/利润率开始下降，那么人们开始抛售是合理的。然而，当我们看到全面增长时，抛售就成了买入机会。
英文原文
Because individual stock fundamentals matter more than macro. $ETH, $SOL crypto markets are a whole different beast with cascading 50x leverage margin liquidations, but with stocks you have FCF/earnings backing up the market cap. With $NBIS for example, when you go from projected $2B ARR to $8B ARR, 20-30% EBIT margins backed by a $22B+ contract backlog from $META and $MSFT, 25BPS rate cut doesn't affect the stock price by -30%. If earnings started to miss + projected revenue/margins started to decrease, then people would be warranted to start selling. However, when we're seeing increasing growth across the board, the sell-off becomes a buying opportunity.
-
CRWV基本面强但负债高，建议短线交易而非长持
手滑发错了，重读时觉得没必要编辑。$CRWV 超卖，550亿美元积压订单，Neocloud 领域龙头，有 $NVDA 背书，业绩不及预期源于数据中心(DC)延迟，仅将收入推迟至后续季度。但我不会长期持有（220亿积压订单来自OpenAI），相比同行其高债务利息侵蚀自由现金流(FCF)/利润率，且资产负债表薄弱（如18亿美元现金），在当前信贷收紧环境下更易受冲击（尤其与未获融资的OpenAI高度相关）。若现价$75持有我不会卖出，但也不会长期持有（仅做短线交易）。发帖时大概就在纠结这算哪类。
英文原文
Accident, didn't feel like editing the post when I read it again. $CRWV is oversold, $55B backlog, Neocloud sector leader, backstopped by $NVDA, miss due to DC delays, just shifts revenue down toward later quarters. However, I would not hold it ($22B of backlog is OpenAI), high debt interest compared to others that cut into FCF/margins, and low balance sheet eg. $1.8B cash which makes it more susceptible to credit tightening right now (especially with correlation to OpenAI with doesnt have the funding). I wouldn’t sell it if I had it now at $75, but I wouldn’t long term hold it either (short term trade). I was probably wondering what category that fits in when I made the post earlier.
-
澄清IREN高短期持仓源于机构可转换票据套利对冲，非散户轧空。
关于 $IREN 投资者可能误解的几点：情况比“21.2%流通盘导致轧空(short squeeze)”要复杂得多。对于 IREN 而言，大量短期持仓(SI)来自可转换票据(convertible note)套利。当机构在发行后购入可转换票据时，他们会做空标的股票进行对冲。鉴于10亿美元的发行规模加上1.25亿美元的购买选择权，相应的对冲操作推高了该 SI 数值。其次，对于市值120亿美元以上的股票，如果该数值如此之高，参与者并非散户，而是机构。
英文原文
So few things $IREN investors might misunderstand: it's more nuanced than 21.2% float -> short squeeze. With IREN a lot of SI is convertible note arbitrage. When institutions acquire convertible notes after the offering, they short the underlying shares for hedging. Given the $1B offering, plus +125M purchase option, corresponding hedge inflates that SI number. Second if a number is that high with a $12B+ stock, it's not retail it's institutions.
-
ALPD高息债及OpenAI订单增加长期风险，新云板块或有更好标的。
$ALPD 承担了以 9.25% 利率发行的垃圾债券(junk bonds)等极差的债务，并与 $CRWV 有关联，后者也有大量不良债务严重侵蚀利润率/自由现金流(FCF) + OpenAI（目前也缺乏资金）占据了大量积压订单 + 产能建设。这在很大程度上增加了长期风险，我尚未对 $APLD 的利息成本进行定量建模。可能还有更好的新云(neocloud)板块标的，但这并不意味着我看空它。对于 $S，我研究得还不够深入，无法给出好的观点。
英文原文
$ALPD took on really bad debt with junk bonds at 9.25% and is connected with $CRWV, which also has a lot of bad debt really cutting into margins/FCF + OpenAI (which also doesn't have the funds yet) taking up a lot of backlog + capacity buildout. That kind increases long term risks by a lot, I haven't done a quantitative modeling yet on $APLD from interest costs. There's probably better neocloud sector picks out ther but that doesn't mean I'm bearish on it. For $S, I haven't looked into it enough to give a good opinion.
-
作者平仓$TGT看涨期权，认为长期持有仍具低估价值。
@h20kita 我此前已平仓 $TGT 的看涨期权(Call Options)。该股已过除息日(Ex-Dividend Date)，即11月12日。这更多是一次基于股息催化剂(Dividend Catalyst)的交易。如果你仍持有仓位并打算长期持有，其估值依然相当低。
英文原文
@h20kita I exited $TGT calls earlier. It passed ex-div date already which was Nov 12th. This was more of a dividend catalyst play. Still pretty undervalued if you still have positions and hold long term.
-
博主调侃自己在不同平台表现迥异
@YodaStockInvest 不，那只是我去 $RDDT 时的样子，在 X 上我是个正常人
英文原文
@YodaStockInvest Nah that’s just me when I visit $RDDT, I’m a normal human being in X
-
美联储官员发表讲话，Miran 总体偏向鸽派。
@RJCcapital @victor_privin @DeepValueBagger @jaijungkim @jiahanjimliu @AustinsStocks 开个玩笑。你说得对，确实没有新闻发布会或会议，但美联储官员今天确实发表了独立讲话。Miran 总体偏向鸽派(dovish)，尽管主要围绕银行监管展开。
英文原文
@RJCcapital @victor_privin @DeepValueBagger @jaijungkim @jiahanjimliu @AustinsStocks Oh just joking. You’re right theres no press conference or meeting but fed officials do give independent speeches today. Miran was generally dovish even though it was mainly around bank regulation.
-
鲍威尔讲话料重申NBIS优于IREN，建议关注个股基本面而非宏观大盘。
杰罗姆（鲍威尔）大概会上台，宣称 $NBIS > $IREN，然后在他走向由悉尼·斯威尼（Sydney Sweeney）坐在副驾的新兰博基尼时潇洒离场（mic drop）。 市场会鼓掌欢呼，因为他说的不过是众所周知的事实。 但除此之外，我们可能会获得更多关于12月降息以及政府停摆后经济前景的见解。大盘随后的走势可谓五五开，因此除非你交易短期指数或更依赖宏观的资产，否则关注个股基本面更为重要。
英文原文
Jerome will probably go on stage, say $NBIS > $IREN, and micdrop after walking offstage to his new lambo that Sydney Sweeney is riding shotgun in. Markets will clap and cheer knowing he said something everyone knows as a fact. But that aside, we’ll probably get more insights into Dec rate cut and a view of the economy after gov blackout. It’s a coin flip direction the general markets go after, so more important to look at individual stock fundamentals unless you trade short term indexes or more macro dependent assets
-
作者称市场大跌为“大重置”，多只AI概念股股价回落至重大利好前水平。
我将这次市场下跌称为“大重置(The great reset)”。 许多股票的价格已重置至其基本面发生变化之前的水平。 $HIMS 回到 Zava 事件前的 $36。 $NBIS 回到微软(MSFT)交易前的 $94。 $CIFR 和 $WULF 回到 AWS/谷歌交易前的价格。 $SNAP 回到与 Perplexity 交易前的价格。 股市的“黑色星期五”提前到来了。
英文原文
The great reset is how I termed the market drop. Lot of names were reset to prices before their fundamentals changes $HIMS back to pre-Zava prices at $36. $NBIS back to pre-MSFT deal prices at $94. $CIFR $WULF back to pre-aws/googl deals $SNAP pre-perplexity deal. Early Black Friday for stocks
-
基于支付使用量及ETF预期，看好莱特币投资潜力
这就是我对 $LTC 看法的由来。我经营一家金融科技(Fintech)公司，看到莱特币(Litecoin)作为支付工具在行业内有着惊人的使用量，即使与 USDC、$SOL、$BTC 等其他资产相比也是如此。现在随着 ETF 的推出，它市值 70 亿，像比特币一样供应有限，加上可能大量囤积供应量的国库型公司，以及市场随机炒作 ZCash 等山寨币，在我看来这其实是一个非常好的买入机会。
英文原文
Oh here’s where my thoughts about $LTC comes in. I run a fintech company and I see Litecoin surprising amount of usage as a payment vehicle across the industry, even when you compare it to USDC, $SOL, $BTC and others. And now when you get a ETF, it’s sitting at 7B MC with finite supply like Bitcoin, + treasury companies that can buy up a lot of supply over time + market randomly pumping altcoins like ZCash, it’s actually a pretty great buy in my view.
-
RKLB长期看好但短期因商业化延迟被高估，需耐心持有。
我可能是 $RKLB 最大的多头之一，它与比特币是我最高确信度的5年期长线持仓。自SpaceX最近的估值/能力以来，我一直维持3500亿-5000亿美元的长期目标价，因为太空领域可能并非赢家通吃。 话虽如此，我最近一直认为它有点被高估（回到60美元时），主要是因为缺乏Neutron/flatlite的商业化，这可能要等到2028-2029年，鉴于当前的营收数据，我们稍微有点早。但只要你等待足够长的时间，它总是一个不错的买入机会。 市场计入的是远期增长，但关键在于这个“未来”有多远（例如对于Rocketlab，就像Snapchat、Nebius一样，其实并不遥远）。
英文原文
I’m probably one of the biggest $RKLB bulls and it’s my highest conviction 5Y long alongside Bitcoin. I’ve maintained $350B-500B long term PT to match SpaceX’s most recent valuation/capabilities since it’s likely not winner takes all in space. That being said I’ve maintained recently it is kinda overvalued (back at $60) just due to lack of Neutron/flatlite commercialization which is likely 2028-2029, and we’re a tad early given current revenue numbers. But always a good buy if you just wait long enough. Market prices in forward growth but it’s more about how long in the future with Rocketlab (eg. With Snapchat, Nebius, it’s not that far).