中文翻译
我一直专注于量化论点，甚至写了一份回复来帮助你们理解产能比较的细微差别+在回复中包含了$IREN 的看好论点。但跳过所有内容然后进行人身攻击，比如“操纵读者以拉升股价”来否定一个论点，对于讨论来说毫无实质意义。
· 杂谈
批评对方跳过量化论点进行人身攻击，强调讨论应基于实质内容。
涉及标的： $IREN
英文原文
I've been focusing on quantitative points and even wrote out a response to help you understand capacity comparison nuances + included an $IREN favored argument in the reply. But just skipping over everything then going into personal attacks like "gaslight readers to pump" to dismiss a point has no substance for a discussion.