全部推文
共 6775 条 · 第 172 / 226 页 · 滚到底自动加载更多
-
博主计划持有AIRO和OSS至年底，看好国防支出红利。
两股“战争部”股票的启示：$AIRO 和 $OSS。 如果你将信息发现与1.5万亿美元的国防支出顺风相结合，就能获得丰厚回报。 自几天前发帖以来，两者均上涨50%以上。我个人计划在我的10倍潜力篮子中持有它们直到年底。
英文原文
A tale of two Department of War stocks $AIRO | $OSS. Information discovery pays dividends if you couple that with the $1.5T Defense spending tailwinds. Both up 50%+ since posting a few days ago. I personally plan to hold them until EOY in my 10x potential basket. https://t.co/7N0ExxEq8c
-
仅供参考，砷化镓(GaAs)价格在金属导报(SMM)上正在飙升（且在美国市场的溢价更高）。 它是一种关键材料，用于： - 超大规模云服务商的光学设备（TPU集群等） - 光收发器（5G，数据） - 激光雷达(LiDAR)（Robotaxi，无人机，军事） - 光模块（互连集群） - 硅光子(SiPh)激光芯片（英伟达未来的共封装光学(CPO)以及英特尔/博通SiPh引擎使用磷化铟(InP)连续波激光阵列。） $AXTI 的CEO表示他们控制了磷化铟(InP)供应链中40%的份额。并且在日本出口管制后，衬底供应链很可能由他们垄断。 所以一家公司卡住了上述所有环节的脖子。
英文原文
FYI 7n prices are exploding on SMM (and it trades at an even higher premium in US markets) It's a critical material used in: - Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc) - Optical transceivers (5g, data) - LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military) -Optical Modules (interconnect clusters) - Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.) $AXTI's CEO said they control 40% of the InP majority of the supply chain. And the substrate supply chain would likely be monopolized by them after Japan export controls. So one company bottlenecks everything above.
-
分析$AXTI在InP衬底供应链的垄断瓶颈地位及非对称投资机会。
磷化铟(InP)衬底的可寻址市场(TAM)此前仅为数亿美元，因为它是一种小众的电信大宗商品。 大多数分析师或卖方报告建模错误，因为其增长并非线性。 这是$AXTI在那些渴望获得配额的全球万亿美元级公司之间，对一种关键材料形成的博弈论式供应瓶颈。 你可以看到，一旦$AXTI和InP的供应短缺启动，其远期TAM和利润率将像高带宽内存(HBM)一样呈指数级增长。我之前做过这个评论，以下是总结： 1. 7N铟原料的价格在上海有色网(SMM)开始飙升，我们看到亚洲供应链与西方供应链（$AXTI出口至西方，推高其尚未积压的未来利润率）之间的分化。 12月19日：亚洲金属网报道“铟锭供应商提高美国报价”，标志着西方定价特定分化的开始。 2025年12月24日：随后报道“铟锭供应商提高中国报价”，证实到周末定价压力已在国内和出口渠道固化。 这影响InP衬底生产商的底线，但$AXTI拥有整个成本结构/供应链，因此任何价格上涨仅有利于其利润率。 2. 超大规模云服务商/西方供应链已经为衬底支付溢价。在$NVDA从$LITE、$COHR等公司锁定外延生长激光二极管(EML)产能后，他们已产能紧张。 -> 我们已看到$MSFT和其他超大规模云服务商的部署因产能问题而放缓。 -> 他们将向上游确保材料（此前因是电信大宗商品而极便宜），然后这就像HBM一样变成博弈论式的配额战。但除了$AXTI，你基本上没有其他能大规模生产的公司。 例如，$GOOGL尤其依赖于此，仅$MSFT的Maia项目若全面铺开预计将占用全球两位数的产能，但实际上根本不够。 3. 最关键的是日本InP衬底供应链受到出口管制，当住友/JX方面的材料耗尽时，$AXTI实际上成为最大的InP衬底供应商。 这纯粹是关于在光子AI升级中，你会如何评估单一公司的单点故障价值。我们可以争论语义，但如果它倒下，整个供应链也会随之崩溃。例如，CEO表示在出口管制前（以及他们筹集1亿美元增加产能前），他们占InP供应链的40%。 而这个巨大的整个AI供应链瓶颈仅估值13亿美元，而一些没有实质影响的随机量子公司却价值100多亿美元。 由于没人知道衬底或原料价格会去向何方，很难准确建模那些TAM突然从数亿变为用于每个AI部署的瓶颈和目标价(PT)。 对我来说，这只是买入拥有最纯粹非对称性博弈的瓶颈（现在恰好是垄断）。
英文原文
TAM for InP substrates was few hundred million previously since it was a niche telecom commodity. Most analysts or charters model this wrong since it's not linear. It's a game theory supply bottleneck of a critical material that $AXTI controls between all the world's trillion dollar companies that are desperate for allocation. You can see both forward TAM and margins increase exponentially like HBM once supply shortage kicks in for $AXTI and InP. I made this comment earlier but this is a summary: 1. Price of 7n Indium feedstock has started to spike on SMM and we're seeing bifurcation between asian supply chains + western ( $AXTI exports to western, which inflates their future margins that aren't already backlogged) Dec 19th: Asian Metal reported that "Indium ingot suppliers raise offering prices in United States," marking the beginning of the specific divergence in Western pricing. December 24, 2025: They subsequently reported that "Suppliers of indium ingot raise quotes in China," confirming that the pricing pressure had solidified across both domestic and export channels by the end of the week. This affects the bottom line of InP substrate producers, but $AXTI owns the entire cost structure/supply chain so any price increases just benefit their margins. 2. Hyperscalers/Western supply chains pay premiums for substrates already. They are capacity strained after $NVDA secured EML capacity from $LITE, $COHR, and others. -> We're already seeing slowdown for $MSFT and other hyperscaler deployments likely because of capacity. -> They will go upstream to secure materials (which are extremely cheap, bc earlier they were commodities for telecom), then this just becomes game theory allocation wars like HBM. But instead of sk hynix, mu, samsung, and the others. You basically only have $AXTI left that can do it at scale. EG. $GOOGL especially is heavily dependent on this, and $MSFT alone from maia was est. to take up double digits of the world's capacity if they wanted to ramp up, but there's literally not enough. 3. The biggest thing was that the Japanese InP substrate supply chain got export controlled, effectively making $AXTI the largest InP substrate provider when materials run out on the Sumitomo/JX side. This is just pure what value would you place on single company point of failure on the photonics AI ramp. We can argue semantics but if it goes down the entire supply chain does too. eg. CEO was saying they were 40% of inp supply chain before export controls (and before their $100M fundraise to increase capacity). And this huge bottleneck of the entire AI supply chain is valued at $1.3B, while random quantum companies with no material impact are worth $10B+. It's impossible to accurately model bottlenecks and PTs where the few hundred million TAM is suddenly used for every single AI deployment because nobody knows where the substrate or feedstock pricing goes. For me it's just buying into the bottleneck with the purest asymmetry play there is (which happens to be a monopoly now).
-
AXTI成AI供应链关键瓶颈，预计3-6个月产能告急。
这可能是历史上首次，全球所有万亿美元市值的超大规模云服务商(hyperscalers)都被 $AXTI 这样一家小公司卡住脖子。而在日本对华出口管制禁令后，该公司将在该瓶颈环节占据垄断地位。我不知道市场将如何评估这一瓶颈，我只是单纯指出这一点。你应该自己做研究！不过，我估计在3-6个月内，AI供应链将进入临界状态，当时住友/JX的库存开始耗尽，且超大规模云服务商开始扩产并意识到由于磷化铟(InP)的次级效应，光子组件(photonic components)已无更多产能。仅 $MSFT 一家就预计将在2026年Q4及2027年 Maia 扩产期间占据整个 InP 供应链产出的两位数份额，而他们甚至尚未开始扩产。
英文原文
This is probably the first time in history all the world's trillion dollar hyperscalers are bottlenecked by such a tiny company in $AXTI. And that company would have a monopoly position in that bottleneck post-export China control ban on Japan. I don't know how markets will evaluate this bottleneck, I'm just simply pointing it out. You should do your own research! However, I would estimate that AI supply chains hit a critical state in 3-6 months time when Sumitomo/JX start running out of inventory and when hyperscalers start to ramp up + realize there's no more capacity for photonic components (by second order effect bc of inp). $MSFT alone was projected to take up double digits of the entire InP supply chain output from Maia ramp in Q4 2026, 2027, and they haven't even started to ramp up yet.
-
AXTI垄断InP瓶颈，全球科技巨头受其制约
全球领先的科技巨头因一家小公司而陷入瓶颈，这恐怕是史无前例的。更关键的是，该公司目前在该瓶颈环节占据垄断地位。未来几个月 $AXTI 的走向，以及市场如何评估这一磷化铟(InP)瓶颈，将非常值得关注。
英文原文
世界をリードするテック企業すべてが、これほど小さな一企業によってボトルネック状態に陥るというのは、恐らく史上初めてのことだろう。しかも、その企業は現在、そのボトルネックにおいて独占的な地位を築いている。 今後数ヶ月で $AXTI がどのような結末を迎えるのか、そして市場がこの InP（インジウムリン）のボトルネックをどう評価するのか、非常に興味深い
-
AXTI垄断InP成AI基建单点故障，市场开始关注。
$AXTI 在磷化铟(InP)领域实际上处于垄断地位，且在中国对日本实施出口管制禁令后，成为以下 AI 基础设施建设中唯一的单点故障(Single Point of Failure)环节： - 英伟达 Nvidia ($4.6T) - 微软 Microsoft ($3.59T) - Meta ($1.64T) - 亚马逊 Amazon ($2.57T) - 谷歌 Google ($3.89T) 看来市场开始意识到这一点了。https://t.co/rxGkcHYBtS
英文原文
$AXTI is effectively a monopoly for InP, and the single point of failure for the AI buildout for: - Nvidia ($4.6T) - Microsoft ($3.59T) - Meta ($1.64T) - Amazon ($2.57T) - Google ($3.89T) after China's export control ban on Japan. Looks like markets are starting to find out. https://t.co/rxGkcHYBtS
-
解析中国对日InP禁令细节及美日在关键材料谈判中的不同处境。
这很微妙，但我尽力解释： 1) 这实际上是禁令，不仅仅是出口管制。这涉及任何与军事最终用户或军事用途相关的内容。对于住友电气(Sumitomo Electric)等主要国防承包商来说，这实际上就是禁令。 还有“次级抵制”规则，直接影响住友/JX： 例如，如果另一家公司购买磷化铟(InP)原料，然后试图将原料/成品收发器转让给日本公司，中国可能会禁止相关公司。 这部分非常微妙。如果你想知道为什么美国在这些出口管制下没事，是因为美国允许英伟达(Nvidia)向中国出售H200芯片，作为交换，中国“解锁”了铟和镓等原材料对美国商业科技公司的供应。这是第72号公告，暂停了对美国民用客户“镓、锗和铟”最严格的“原则性禁令”，直到2026年11月27日。但隐含地，微软(MSFT)、Lite等被视为更偏向商业性质（即使它们不是，MSFT确实服务于美国政府），因为这是为了允许中国训练其AI模型而进行的交换。不幸的是，日本没有像美国这样的筹码。 2) 在2026年公告之前，磷化铟(InP)已被列入中国官方的两用物项出口管制清单。金属报告和公司披露确认，InP于2025年2月被置于出口许可证要求之下。 2026年1月关于日本的公告适用于中国两用物项出口管制清单上的所有物品（800-900项）。由于InP已在2025年最终确定为两用物项，因此自动包含在针对日本的新限制中。 $AXTI被允许向受出口管制和光学制造商限制的西方国家发货，但不允许向日本发货。（西方超大规模云服务商本来就是主要目标） 住友将无法获得能够大规模生产成品所需的材料，因为中国控制了全球InP衬底生产所需的大部分关键材料。 所以情况并不完全相同。
英文原文
So this is pretty nuanced but i'll try my best to explain: 1) It's actually a ban. Not just export controls. This refers to anything related to military end-users or for military purposes. For major defense contractors like, Sumitomo Electric, this is effectively a ban. There was also the Secondary Boycott rule, which directly impacts Sumitomo/JX: Eg. if another company buys InP feedstock then tries to transfer the feedstock/finish transceiver to a Japanese company, China could ban the related companies next. This part is really nuanced. So if you're wondering why US is fine under these export controls, US allowed Nvidia to sell H200 chips to China and in exchange, China "unlocked" the supply of raw materials like indium and gallium for U.S. commercial tech companies. This was Announcement No. 72, which suspended the strictest "principle bans" on "gallium, germanium, and indium" for U.S. civilian customers until nov 27, 2026. But implicitly, Microsoft, Lite, and others are treated more as commercial (even they're not, MSFT does serve the US gov), since this was an exchange to allow China train its AI models the critical materials. Unfortunately, Japan has no leverage like the US on this. 2) InP was already added to China's official dual use export control list prior to the 2026 announcement. Metal reports and company disclosures confirmed that InP were placed under export licensing requirements in February 2025. The Jan 2026 announcement regarding Japan applies to all items on China's dual use export control list (800-900 items). Since InP was already finalized as a dual-use item in 2025, it is automatically included in the new restrictions targeting Japan. $AXTI is allowed to ship to Western countries from export controls and optical makers but not to Japan. (Western hyperscalers are main target anyway) Sumitomo would not have the materials able to make the finished products to ship at scale since China controls majority of the world's critical materials required for inp substrate prod. So it's not quite the same position.
-
Bressner出售利好$OSS，市场将重估其高利润率防御业务，整体看涨。
微妙之处在于，Bressner 的出售极其积极。我最初没有买入 $OSS，因为其部门搞乱了综合利润率计算。但在发现其纯防御垂直领域的利润率后，我意识到它极其专业化。市场也会意识到这一点，并将其估值从大宗商品地位重估为高科技国防承包商溢价。算法可能会因营收变化而误解，但做多该股的投资者会认为这对他们持仓极为有利，因为这是一个高利润率、需求大于供给的垂直领域正在扩张。此外，还有 1.5 万亿美元的国防支出流向这家小型国防承包商以及像 $AIRO 这样的无人机公司，因此我对该股整体看涨（尤其是在向机器人领域过渡时）。
英文原文
Nuanced, the Bressner sale is extremely extremely positive. I didn’t enter $OSS originally because that division messed up blended margin calculations. But after discovering their pure play defense vertical and margins, I realized it was extraordinarily specialized. Market will realize that too and re-rate it from commodity status to a high tech dod contractor premium. Algorithmically they might misunderstand from revenue changes but the people who long the stock will see this as incredibly positive on their position scaling a high margin, demand > capacity vertical. Then there’s the $1.5T in defense spend following down to this small defense contractor and drone companies like $AIRO, so just bullish all around on the stock (esp as we transition to robotics)
-
澄清非卖课，对比OSS国防订单与AXTIAI瓶颈逻辑。
我不想要订阅者，也不想向粉丝出售任何东西！ 建立这个主页纯粹是出于兴趣，测试我自己的投资论点(Thesis)与市场表现，并在帮助他人中获得满足感。 但回答你的问题，$OSS 和 $AXTI 是截然不同的股票。 有1.5万亿美元的美国政府国防支出，这对 $OSS 帮助巨大。考虑到他们订单已经积压，很难想象还有更大的利好。 而 $AXTI 是西方人工智能建设中的单点故障(Single Point of Failure)环节。 两者都非常有趣，所以我不认为其中一个比另一个更好。
英文原文
I don't want subscribers or want to sell anything to followers! Made my profile out of pure interest testing my own thesis against the markets and getting fulfillment in helping others too. But to answer your question $OSS and $AXTI are way too different stocks. There's $1.5T US Gov spending into defense which helps $OSS a LOT. Hard to imagine when they're already backlogged. Then $AXTI is single point of failure for the Western AI buildout. Both are incredibly interesting, so I wouldn't say one is better than the other.
-
AXTI若禁运将阻碍AI基建，超大规模云服务商短期仍依赖其供应。
@NEgleston @jaysyoon 如果 $AXTI 无法向美国出口，那么关于人工智能基础设施建设（AI buildout）就有更严重的问题需要担忧。这对美国是一个巨大的威胁，这就是为什么超大规模云服务商（hyperscalers）正在设计绕过该限制的方案（这需要3年时间），在此期间他们仍然处于依赖状态。
英文原文
@NEgleston @jaysyoon If $AXTI is not able to export to US, then there are bigger problems to worry about regarding the AI buildout It's a huge threat to America which is why hyperscalers are engineering around it (which would take 3 years), in the meantime they're dependent https://t.co/Vpq5KQdm13
-
AXTI因光子学垄断地位及出口管制影响，估值远低于同行，增长空间巨大。
恕我直言，$AXTI 才刚刚起步。这仅仅是日本供应链遭受出口管制重击后，产能爬坡的开始。 这是西方部署光子学 AI 的单点故障环节，且处于垄断地位，相关市场价值为 13 亿美元。 你看那些随机的量子计算和能源公司估值都超过 100 亿美元了。我认为它还有很大的增长空间。
英文原文
$AXTI is just getting started imo. This is only beginning the ramp up after the export control nuke on Japan's supply chains. This is single point of failure and a monopoly for Western's AI deployment using photonics valued at $1.3B. You have random quantum and energy companies are valued at $10B+. I think there's room to grow.
-
小盘股如OSS和AVA因规模限制无法进行股票回购。
@sjahmed08 对于较小的参与者来说，这并不重要。像 $OSS 或 $AVA 这样的公司，鉴于其规模，并没有能力进行股票回购。
英文原文
@sjahmed08 It's not material for smaller players. Players like $OSS or $AVA aren't in positions to do share buybacks given their size.
-
铟价分化及日本出口管制使AXTI成AI光子学关键瓶颈，估值被低估。
这只是我个人的观点。自上次财报电话会议以来，许多情况已发生变化： 1. 7纳米铟(Indium)原料价格在SMM开始飙升，我们看到亚洲供应链与西方供应链（$AXTI向西方出口，推高其尚未积压的未来利润率）之间出现分化。 12月19日：Asian Metal报道“铟锭供应商提高美国报价”，标志着西方定价特定分化的开始。 2025年12月24日：随后报道“铟锭供应商提高中国报价”，证实截至周末，定价压力已在国内和出口渠道固化。 这影响磷化铟(InP)衬底生产商的底线，但$AXTI拥有整个成本结构/供应链，因此任何价格上涨仅有利于其利润率。 2. 超大规模数据中心/西方供应链已为衬底支付溢价。在$NVDA从$LITE、$COHR等公司锁定外延生长(EML)产能后，他们面临产能紧张。 -> 我们已看到$MSFT和其他超大规模数据中心部署放缓，可能源于产能问题。 -> 他们将向上游锁定材料（此前作为电信大宗商品极其便宜），然后这变成类似高带宽内存(HBM)的博弈论分配战。但除了$AXTI，你几乎找不到其他能大规模生产的公司。 例如，$GOOGL尤其依赖于此，仅$MSFT的Maia项目若全面铺开预计将占用全球两位数产能，但实际根本不够。 3. 最大变化是日本InP衬底供应链受到出口管制，当住友/JX方面材料耗尽时，$AXTI实际上成为最大的InP衬底供应商。 这纯粹是关于在光子学AI扩张中，对单一公司故障点价值的评估。我们可以争论语义，但如果它倒下，整个供应链也会崩溃。例如，CEO称在出口管制（及其1亿美元融资扩产）之前，他们占InP供应链的40%。 这个整个AI供应链的巨大瓶颈市值仅为13亿美元，而一些无实质影响的量子公司市值却超100亿美元。 很难对瓶颈进行建模，因为数亿总可寻址市场(TAM)突然用于每个AI部署，且无人知晓衬底或原料价格去向。
英文原文
So this is just my perspective on this. Lot of things have changed since the last earnings call, 1. Price of 7n Indium feedstock has started to spike on SMM and we're seeing bifurcation between asian supply chains + western ( $AXTI exports to western, which inflates their future margins that aren't already backlogged) Dec 19th: Asian Metal reported that "Indium ingot suppliers raise offering prices in United States," marking the beginning of the specific divergence in Western pricing. December 24, 2025: They subsequently reported that "Suppliers of indium ingot raise quotes in China," confirming that the pricing pressure had solidified across both domestic and export channels by the end of the week. This affects the bottom line of InP substrate producers, but $AXTI owns the entire cost structure/supply chain so any price increases just benefit their margins. 2. Hyperscalers/Western supply chains pay premiums for substrates already. They are capacity strained after $NVDA secured EML capacity from $LITE, $COHR, and others. -> We're already seeing slowdown for $MSFT and other hyperscaler deployments likely because of capacity. -> They will go upstream to secure materials (which are extremely cheap, bc earlier they were commodities for telecom), then this just becomes game theory allocation wars like HBM. But instead of sk hynix, mu, samsung, and the others. You basically only have $AXTI left that can do it at scale. EG. $GOOGL especially is heavily dependent on this, and $MSFT alone from maia was est. to take up double digits of the world's capacity if they wanted to ramp up, but there's literally not enough. 3. The biggest thing was that the Japanese InP substrate supply chain got export controlled, effectively making $AXTI the largest InP substrate provider when materials run out on the Sumitomo/JX side. This is just pure what value would you place on single company point of failure on the photonics AI ramp. We can argue semantics but if it goes down the entire supply chain does too. eg. CEO was saying they were 40% of inp supply chain before export controls (and before their $100M fundraise to increase capacity). And this huge bottleneck of the entire AI supply chain is valued at $1.3B, while random quantum companies with no material impact are worth $10B+. It's hard to model bottlenecks where the few hundred million TAM is suddenly used for every single AI deployment because nobody knows where the substrate or feedstock pricing goes.
-
尽管微软下调预期，仍看好AAOI长期必然性，建议等待。
@Motorphy @B38B37 $AAOI 与 $MSFT Maia 项目深度绑定，而微软刚刚大幅下调了预期（这就是为什么 $MRVL 今天跌了 4%）。 尽管如此，我依然非常看好它，因为这更多是必然趋势，只是存在执行层面的不确定性，只需等待一两年即可。
英文原文
@Motorphy @B38B37 $AAOI is heavily tethered to $MSFT Maia and they just heavily lowered estimates (hence why $MRVL went down 4% today). I still really like it regardless since it’s more of an inevitability minus execution uncertainty, just need to wait it out for a year or two.
-
作者对$OSS持观望态度，若项目落地，预计6个月内市值可达10亿美元。
@bigbull_0410 是的，$OSS 对我来说属于“观望”类别，我想看看能否从中获得 1000%+ 的回报。 说实话，如果该奖项（award）顺利落地，我不惊讶于看到它在 6 个月内达到 10 亿美元市值（Market Cap）。
英文原文
@bigbull_0410 Yeah $OSS is one of those wait and see for me to see if I get a 1000%+ out of this. Honestly wouldn’t be surprised if I see this at $1B MC in 6 months if the award goes through.
-
作者澄清其推文旨在通过新颖分析测试论点，而非投资建议。
我的意思是，我关于 $AXTI 和 $AIRO 的大部分帖子都是基于公开信息的新型信息综合。所以，如果市场发现 AXT 是人工智能供应链的单点故障，导致其股价上涨 100%，这是合乎情理的。或者在这种情况下，市场不知道 $OSS 在委内瑞拉的参与。除此之外，我只是发布我的思考过程或新颖分析，以测试我的论点与市场反应。这不是建议，也不推荐他人跟随。
英文原文
I mean most of my posts from $AXTI and $AIRO are novel information synthesis based on public info. So makes sense if stuff like AXT goes up 100% once markets find out it’s the single point of failure for the AI supply chain. Or in this case markets didn’t know about $OSS involvement in Venezuela. That aside I’m just posting my own thought process or just novel analysis to test my thesis against the markets. Not advice or recommending others to follow along.
-
作者认为OSS相比KRKNF具有更高上涨空间，故选择前者。
@drakeondigital 我关注 $KRKNF 已有一段时间，确实挺看好它。但我个人觉得 $OSS 的上涨空间要大得多，这也是我选择 OSS 的原因。
英文原文
@drakeondigital I’ve known about $KRKNF for awhile and I do like it. But I personally think $OSS has a lot higher upside, which is why I chose OSS.
-
感谢提及，关注AXTI和AIRO走势，期待OSS后续表现。
@pepemoonboy 感谢提及，你的期权卖出挑战目前进展顺利！最近观察 $AXTI 和 $AIRO 确实很有趣。很好奇 $OSS 接下来会如何表现。
英文原文
@pepemoonboy Appreciate the shoutout and looking good so far on your option selling challenge! It’s definitely been fun watching $AXTI and $AIRO recently. Curious how $OSS does next.
-
看好$OSS，因其获美军使用、高毛利且需求旺盛。
@LawnChairCap $OSS 令人极度兴奋，当我看到这家市值仅 1.55 亿美元的公司正在做的事情时，简直不敢相信自己的眼睛。它已被美国军方在委内瑞拉使用，毛利率达 45%，手握 4000 多万美元现金，需求超过产能，处于极度火热的赛道，天哪。
英文原文
@LawnChairCap $OSS is incredibly exciting and I couldn’t believe my eyes when I saw what they were doing at a $155m MC. Like already being used in Venezuela by US military, 45% gross margins with a $40m+ cash pile, demand exceeding capacity, extremely hot sector, jeez
-
AXTI和AIRO短期暴涨，深入研究后对OSS持看多态度。
@B38B37 观察 $AXTI 和 $AIRO 的走势真是令人捧腹，两者在一周左右的时间里都上涨了50%以上。 不过，在深入研究该公司，特别是委内瑞拉入侵事件及其受益者后，我对 $OSS 相当看好。
英文原文
@B38B37 $AXTI and $AIRO have been hilarious to watch both are up 50%+ in a week or so. I’m pretty bullish on $OSS though after looking into company, esp. Venezuelan invasion and beneficiaries.
-
建仓$OSS，认为其作为边缘AI国防承包商获实战验证，高毛利且被低估。
我建仓了 $OSS。 我通常不说这种话，但这只股票令人兴奋。 市场完全错过了这家市值1.55亿美元的无人机群、幽灵舰队、无人水面艇(USV)、边缘AI部署的美国国防部承包商。 他们尤其错过了 OSS 在委内瑞拉入侵行动中的参与，这给 $AVAV 等股票带来了溢价。 在我看来，这看起来像是一个“邪恶”的长线机会： 1. 4100万美元现金（预计）/ 1.55亿美元市值（下行风险低）。 2. 纯动能防御(Pure play Kinetic Defense)标的。 3. 供需比为 1:2.4（因需求旺盛而积压）。 4. 45%的毛利率。 主要兴趣点在于委内瑞拉作为其在美国军队中实际使用的证明： $OSS P-8 海神在委内瑞拉： - 飞行追踪数据证实，第40巡逻中队(VP-40)的 P-8A 海神飞机在突袭期间在委内瑞拉海岸附近，以监控委内瑞拉海军动向。 OSS 关联：2025年7月1日，OSS 宣布了一项500万美元的紧急订单，专门用于为 P-8A 海神交付“61台加固数据单元”。 SOCOM “抓捕小组”： - 抓捕领导层的突袭由美国特种作战司令部(USSOCOM)执行，具体使用了海上插入团队（可能是海豹突击队/SWCC）和第160特种作战航空团（直升机）。 OSS 关联：2025年5月29日，OSS 直接与 USSOCOM 签署了合作研发协议(CRADA)，为海洋环境制造边缘计算机。OSS 为潜入委内瑞拉海岸的隐形船只构建了战斗追踪服务器。 “幽灵舰队”封锁： - “南方长矛行动”目前正在使用无人水面艇（无人机船）封锁油轮。 OSS 关联：海军的“第59特遣队”（以及较新的第4舰队等效部队）在这些无人机上使用 $OSS Rigel 边缘超级计算机，因为它是少数能装入40英尺机器人船的小型AI服务器之一。 这字面意义上是委内瑞拉的实战验证。对于一家市值1.55亿美元的小公司而言。 在之前，每个人都把这家公司当作像 $SMCI 那样的大宗商品（包括我自己），但我完全错过了他们的国防垂直领域（在出售 Bressner 后现在是纯标的）拥有45.6%的毛利率。 直到我再次深入研究后，才意识到他们的另一个部门因为混合毛利率（仅转售国防装备）完全搞乱了毛利计算。 所以现在我们有一个： ~45%毛利率，估值1.55亿美元，拥有4100万美元现金，需求超出供应2.4倍的AI军事承包商。 去年晚些时候我做了一个分析，当时看起来 $OSS 是 Andruil 或 $PLTR 的供应商，并开始爬坡。 再次审视出售后的情况，45%的毛利率使他们进入极其卓越的领域（例如洛克希德·马丁，12-14%）或大宗商品卖家（例如 $SMCI，$DELL 8-14%）。 这是一个经过战争验证的专用防御AI纯标的，用于无人机群、幽灵舰队、USV等，具有极高的毛利率，市值1.55亿美元。 我发现这是一个令人兴奋的重新发现，所以我建仓了。
英文原文
I've initiated a position in $OSS. I usually never say this but, this one is exciting. Markets completely missed this 155M MC Drone Swarm, Ghost Fleet, USVs, Edge AI deploying US DoD contractor. And they especially missed OSS’s involvement in the Venezuela's invasion, that gave premiums to $AVAV and others. This looks like an unholy long to me: 1. $41M cash (pro forma ets.) / $155M MC (low downside risk). 2. Pure play Kinetic Defense 3. 1 : 2.4x supply/demand. (backlogged from high demand) 4. 45% gross margins. The main interest was Venezuela as proof they're actively being used in the US military: $OSS P-8 Poseidon in Venezuela: - Flight tracking data confirmed that P-8A Poseidon aircraft from Patrol Squadron 40 (VP-40) were off the coast of Venezuela during the raid to monitor Venezuelan naval movements. OSS Link: On July 1 2025, OSS announced a $5M urgent order specifically to deliver "61 Rugged Data Units" for the P-8A Poseidon. SOCOM "Capture Team": - The raid to capture leadership was executed by US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), specifically using maritime insertion teams (likely SEALs/SWCC) and the 160th SOAR (helicopters). OSS Link: On May 29, 2025, OSS signed a (CRADA) directly with USSOCOM to build edge computers for Maritime Environments. OSS built the battle-tracking servers for the stealth boats used to slip into the Venezuelan coast. "Ghost Fleet" Blockade: - "Operation Southern Spear" is currently using unmanned surface vessels (drone boats) to block oil tankers. OSS Link: The Navy's "Task Force 59" (and the newer 4th Fleet equivalent) uses the $OSS Rigel Edge Supercomputer for these drones because it is one of the few AI servers small enough to fit on a 40-foot robot boat. This is literally combat validation in Venezuela. Of a small $155M stock. Before everyone treated this company as a commodity like $SMCI (myself included), but I completely missed that their defense vertical (which is pure-play now after the Bressner sale) has 45.6% gross margins. Only after I looked into it again after did I realize their other division was completely messing up margin calculations because of blended margins (from just re-selling defense gear). So now we have a: ~45% margins, AI military contractor valued at $155M business with $41m cash, with demand outstripping supply 2.4 to 1. I did an analysis later last year, which looked like $OSS was a supplier for Andruil or $PLTR, and was beginning their ramp up. Looking at it again post-sale, the 45% margin puts them into extremely stellar territory (compared to eg. Lockheed Martin, 12-14%) or commodity sellers (eg. $SMCI, $DELL 8-14%) This is a specialized war-validated defense AI pure-play for drone swarms, ghost fleets, USVs, and others, with extremely high margins, at $155M MC. I've found this to be an exciting re-discovery, so I've taken a position.
-
CRDO为基于误传的波段交易，下跌或成做多良机
@LongInnovation $CRDO 对我来说不是一个大仓位。这更多是基于关于客户即将转向 $MRVL 的错误信息以及一些主题演讲的混乱情况而进行的波段交易。但这次下跌可能会为其他想做多的人提供一个有吸引力的入场点。
英文原文
@LongInnovation $CRDO is not a big position for me. More of a swing trade based off misinformation posted about customer about to $MRVL and some keynote shenanigans. But the drop might present an attractive entry point for others who want to go long.
-
作者对比了CRDO的抄底难度与SNDK/MU的持有策略，并提及AIRO反弹案例。
谢谢，不过 Credo 对我来说更多是个人交易标的。但当走势像“飞刀”时（$CRDO 上月以来下跌超 35%），真的很难抄底。相比之下，全仓转入 $SNDK 和 $MU 然后不动它要容易得多。像 $AIRO 这种看似“飞刀”的标的后来反弹了 48%，所以如果操作得当，抄底其实很赚钱。不过我们得看看我的解读是否正确，我很享受用市场来测试自己的理论。
英文原文
Thanks, Credo is personally more of a trade for me though. But it's really hard to time the bottoms when things look like a falling knife ( $CRDO down 35%+ since last month). Much easier to just full port it into $SNDK and $MU and just not touch it. Stuff like $AIRO looked like a falling knife too then recovered 48%, so bottom catching is quite profitable if done right. We'll see if my interpretation is correct though, I have a fun time testing my own theories against the markets.
-
@itsDanielWu 说得在理，我也看到整个行业都在向光子学(Photonics)转型，包括 $LITE 等公司。但在光子学产能爬坡方面，我有关于磷化铟(InP)衬底瓶颈的独立观点，因此我个人对实现规模化持更悲观的态度。
英文原文
@itsDanielWu That's fair, I see the entire industry moving to photonics as well with $LITE and others. But in regards to photonic ramp, I've had my own thesis on InP substrates bottlenecks, so I'm personally more bearish on getting this to scale https://t.co/d6eDk7K204
-
博主计划在当前价位买入CRDO，并通过光子学板块对冲风险。
如果我基于我的巫术技术分析图表进行交易，我会个人在 $CRDO 130美元水平（即当前价位）买入。上月财报后从210美元跌至130美元，尤其是受假新闻影响，这使得该价位成为一个有吸引力的入场点。Credo 可能会进一步下跌，但我目前通过光子学(Photonics)板块进行了很好的对冲。
英文原文
If I trade based off my voodoo TA charting, I'd be personally buying $CRDO at $130 level (which is around now). Dropping from $210 -> $130 post-earnings last month, especially from fake news, makes this an attractive entry. Credo could always drop further, but I'm hedged pretty well with photonics right now.
-
质疑MRVL AEC竞争力，看好CRDO增长，预期光学瓶颈将延长铜缆寿命。
我的意思是，$MRVL 自 2022 年以来难道没有宣布过四次左右像 Alaska A 这样的 AEC（有源铜缆）杀手吗？我把它当作 $AMD 宣称每一代发布最终都要击败 $NVDA 来看待。 $CRDO 的财报和预测一直在以惊人的速度增长，尽管 Marvell 会是严肃的竞争对手（但如果 Marvell 起飞，两者仍有共存空间）。 我认为光学是最大威胁，但我一直预期 $AXTI 的光学组件会出现巨大的光学瓶颈，因此超大规模云厂商很可能被迫延长铜缆的使用寿命。
英文原文
I mean hasn't $MRVL announced an AEC killer with Alaska A like 4+ different times now since 2022? I treat it like $AMD saying they'll finally beat $NVDA with each gen release. $CRDO's earnings + projections just keeps growing at insane rates, though Marvell would be a serious competitor (but room for both if Marvell takes off). I see optical as the biggest threat, but I've been expecting a huge optical bottleneck for opticals components w/ $AXTI, so hyperscalers will likely be forced into copper life extension.
-
澄清AMZN谣言，分析AXTI光学瓶颈及铜缆长期需求。
很多人误读了“无缆化”的评论，尽管主要下跌是由关于$AMZN的“color change”（色彩变化）谣言引起的。 你精准指出了$CRDO的看空逻辑，但这我们一直都知道。我的持仓观点较为微妙，因为我看到$AXTI等公司正在对规模化扩展所需的光学组件形成瓶颈。（尤其是昨天住友电工的西方供应链因出口管制而遭受重创，这 largely 是光学建设所必需的） 我们可能会看到对铜缆及铜缆寿命延长的长期需求，尽管Credo确实拥有光DSP垂直领域业务。
英文原文
Tons of people misinterpreted the "cableless comment", though the main drop was the $AMZN color change misinformation. So you've nailed the bear case for $CRDO, but we've always known this. My position is nuanced since I see $AXTI and others bottle necking optical components required for scale out. (especially now that the Western supply chain in Sumitomo got export control nuked yesterday, largely required for optical buildout) We'll likely see long tail demand for copper and copper life extension, although Credo does have optical dsp verticals.
-
澄清CES误导，认为$CRDO错杀，因内部线缆变更及光子学布局而加仓。
我在$CRDO下跌25.7%时加仓，利用了CES上的信息误导。 1. 最初的大幅下跌是因为投资者在$AMZN数据中心发现了橙色和蓝色线缆（暗示$CRDO失去客户）。 实际情况是亚马逊仅为内部物流要求更改颜色——由Mizuho的Vijay Rakesh证实。 2. CES 2026主题演讲——第二次下跌是因为黄仁勋提到Rubin NVL72机架的“无缆”设计。 “无缆”说法特指连接GPU与NVLink交换机的内部铜背板（盲插中板）。 $CRDO的主要产品是有源电缆(AEC)，用于机架外部连接服务器与网络交换机。Nvidia的“无缆”技术仅替换Credo未生产的内部部件。 黄仁勋确实提到了Spectrum-X以太网光子学，但$CRDO也在光子学领域运营，拥有“BlueBird”（光数字信号处理器）和“ZeroFlap”光模块。还有机架顶部连接，这是Credo的主营业务（也是未来2-3年能效最高的解决方案）。 正如我多次在$AXTI中指出的，人们对转向光子学存在更大担忧，但鉴于供应短缺，行业正走向混合模式（铜+光子学）。 总之，投资者只是不了解细微差别，并非故意散布虚假信息。 因此我个人加仓了$CRDO，因为其大部分市值因无关紧要且错误的消息被抹去。
英文原文
I've added $CRDO on the 25.7% drop, taking advantage of CES misinformation. 1. Large drop initially was because investors spotted orange and blue cables in $AMZN DCs (implying $CRDO customer loss). All that happened was Amazon requested a color change for internal logistics. - confirmed by Vijay Rakesh from Mizuho. 2. CES 2026 keynote - Second drop was Jensen Huang said "Cableless" design of Rubin NVL72 rack. The "cableless" claim refers specifically to the internal copper backplane (blind-mate midplane) that connects the GPUs to the NVLink switches within a single rack. $CRDO's main product is AEC, for outside of the racks that connect the entire server rack to the network switch. Nvidia's "Cableless" Tech only replaces internal parts Credo didn't make. Jensen did mention Spectrum-X Ethernet Photonics, but $CRDO is operating in the photonics space too with "BlueBird" (Optical DSPs) and "ZeroFlap" optics. And then there's Top of the Rack Connectivity, which is Credo's main business (which is the most power efficient solution for the next 2-3y). There are larger concerns over the shift to photonics (as I've pointed out with $AXTI multiple times), but industry is moving toward a hybrid model (copper + photonics) given the supply shortage. Again as an overview, investors just did not know the nuances, not intentional disinformation. So I ended up personally adding $CRDO since a large percent of its market cap got wiped from immaterial + incorrect news.
-
AXTI因出口管制获垄断优势，虽今日大涨但真正波动或滞后，目前属早期入场。
考虑到今日的出口管制使 $AXTI 处于垄断地位，我认为今天超过+20%的涨幅本应更大！ 然而，真正的波动可能会像 $SNDK 或内存市场案例那样，在1-2个月后瓶颈出现时才会发生。 市值依然非常小，媒体也毫无报道。在座的各位仅仅是比市场更早入场罢了。
英文原文
本日の輸出規制により $AXTI が独占状態となったことを考えれば、今日の+20%を超える上昇はもっと大きくあるべきだったと考えていました！ しかし、本格的な変動は $SNDKやメモリ市場で起きた事例のように、1〜2ヶ月後にボトルネックが生じた際に起こるでしょう。 時価総額は依然として非常に小さく、メディアでの報道も皆無です。ここにいる皆さんは、単に市場より一足早く参入しているに過ぎません
-
博主调侃日本气象播报员恋情传闻及其对某人的影响。
@zephyr_z9 你确定不是因为日本气象播报员日山沙耶(Saya Hiyama)被曝秘密交往男友？ 然后，这位隐藏粉丝习近平(Xi Jingping)在该事件后士气低落。
英文原文
@zephyr_z9 Are you sure it’s not because Japanese Weather reporter Saya Hiyama was caught secretly having a boyfriend? Then Xi Jingping, a closeted fan, became demoralized after the incident.