个股论点
围绕单一股票的投资逻辑与仓位表态 · 共 2373 条 · 滚到底自动加载更多
-
认为不是在替 SOFI CEO 站台，而是在支持散户。
@FinDataByLig 我是在替散户投资者着想，不是替 $SOFI CEO 的口袋着想。 不过如果他们把所有竞争都挡掉，那对 SOFI 大体上确实是利好，但你也就只能接受那种很差的利率了。
英文原文
@FinDataByLig I’m looking out for retail investors, don’t give a sht about lining up the pockets of $SOFI CEO. But yes if they ban out all the competition, that’s largely bullish for SOFI but enjoy the sht interest rates.
-
开玩笑说如果 ASML 只要 6 亿美元就能买下来，那就太值了。
@Huntsman7615 如果能用 6 亿美元买下 $ASML，谁会不报名呢？
英文原文
@Huntsman7615 Is it possible to buy $ASML for $600m? Sign me up
-
用 BKKT 和 IREN 的例子批评过度稀释。
@SarahLeon28397 我之前在 $BKKT 40 美元和一路因稀释下跌时也说过同样的话。 现在它已经跌到 8 美元以下了。 有意思的是，几个月前那些 $IREN 的账号当时还在卖 Bakkt。 而现在他们又在替 60 亿美元的稀释辩护，尽管前一只股票已经跌掉 90%+ 了。
英文原文
@SarahLeon28397 I said the same thing about $BKKT at $40 and on the way down with dilution. Now it’s <$8. It’s funny that the same $IREN profiles months back where the same ones shilling Bakkt. And they’re the same ones defending a $6,000,000,000 dilution after the former stock crashed 90%+ https://t.co/Iswyeq2tMZ
-
指出 IREN 董事会里有同一个人，擅长向散户倾倒 ATM。
除了 Snapchat，也许…… $ASST、$IREN、$BKKT？ Iren 董事会里正好坐着一个共同的家伙。 他最出名的就是把过度 ATM 往散户头上倾倒。
英文原文
Aside from Snapchat, maybe… $ASST, $IREN, $BKKT? There happens to be a common denominator sitting on Iren’s Board of Directors. Famous for dumping excessive ATMs on retail investors. https://t.co/qGCWsGIGXD
-
明确表示继续看多 AEHR。
@jaimecarralon 是的，我现在是看多 $AEHR 的。 我也借用那个格式顺手拿 $LITE 开了个玩笑，不是那个意思。 不过从这里开始它确实很有吸引力。
英文原文
@jaimecarralon Yes I’m long on $AEHR. Also used inevitable to poke some fun at others using that format with $LITE, don’t really mean that. But it’s highly compelling long from here
-
认为 AEHR 两年上 420 美元并非不可能。
$AEHR 到 420 美元看起来是迟早的事。 也许两年？ 我不觉得我见过这么多超大规模客户或 AI 公司去给一家 11 亿美元的小公司做资格认证。 上一次还是 $AAOI 在 25 美元时，而现在几个月后已经到 104 美元了。
英文原文
$420 looks inevitable on $AEHR. Maybe 2 years? Don’t think I’ve seen so many hyperscalers or AI companies qualifying a small $1.1B company before? Last time was $AAOI back at $25 and now it’s $104 a few months later. https://t.co/PaYZoCmMNl
-
认为 AEHR 三年内有望 10 倍。
@Ud197601 $AEHR 看起来三年内能涨 10 倍。
英文原文
@Ud197601 $AEHR looks like a 10x in 3 years.
-
表示 AEHR 在测试领域现在是高确定性标的。
@TD_btc24 是的，$AEHR 现在在测试领域里是高确定性的标的。那里面有很大潜力。
英文原文
@TD_btc24 Yeah $AEHR is high conviction now in the test space. Tons of potential there
-
相信 AAOI 一年后 6B 市值仍明显低估，可用卖看跌期权更稳。
@SarAEsQMd 所以我对一年后的 $AAOI 很有信心，考虑到每月 3.79 亿美元的爬坡，以及激光 fab -> 设计 -> 组装的供应链，这 60 亿美元市值对它来说还是很低估。 不过在这段时间里，我们大概率会因为战争而经历极端波动。 如果你想更稳一点，也可以卖几周后的 CSP。
英文原文
@SarAEsQMd So I'm confident in 1 year time, with $379m/month ramp laser fab -> design -> assembly supply chain. That $6B is very undervalued for $AAOI. But we'll likely experience extreme volatility in the meantime from war. If you want to play it safe you can sell CSPs few weeks out.
-
认为 AEHR 在小市值下被低估，正被多家超大客户做资格认证。
$AEHR 在大约 11 亿美元市值下看起来极有吸引力。 Aehr 开始让我想起早期的 $TER，又有点像财报前的 $AAOI。 如果把时间线和猜测客户列出来： 2 月 11 日：Sonoma 为超大客户的 AI ASIC 处理器拿到生产胜利。（大概率是 $GOOGL、$AMZN、$META） - 可能是谷歌？Aehr 收购了 Incal，而 Incal 曾被猜测会被谷歌用于 TPU。 2 月 26 日：来自 AI 主力客户的 1400 万美元。（大概率是 $AMD、$NVDA） - 这里更像是 $AMD，用于 Instinct MI300/MI400。 3 月 3 日：一台 FOX-XP 系统对应的主硅光客户。（大概率是 $INTC siph） - 很可能 $INTC 就是他们的主客户。 3 月 31 日：来自一家新的大型硅光客户的首单。（大概率是 $AVGO、$MRVL、$CSCO） - 新客户（排除了 Intel），大概是这些正转向 800G/1.6T 硅光收发器的公司之一。 （这些都属于非常保密的 BOM 级推测） 不管怎样，这条时间线对 $AEHR 来说就是在不断加码。 也许就是下一次财报。也可能再过两季。 但感觉量产订单只是时间问题。
英文原文
$AEHR looks extremely promising at ~$1.1B MC. Aehr is starting to remind me of an early $TER, mixed with pre-earnings $AAOI. If we look at the timeline and speculated customers: Feb 11th: Sonoma production win for Hyperscaler's AI ASIC processors. (likely $GOOGL, $AMZN, $META). - Probably Google? Aehr bought Incal, who was speculated to be used by Google for their TPUs. Feb 26th: $14 million from AI lead customer (likely $AMD, $NVDA) - Probably $AMD here for Instinct MI300/MI400. March 3rd: Lead silicon photonics customer for one FOX-XP system (likely $INTC siph) - Very likely $INTC has been their lead customer. March 31st: Initial order from major new silicon photonics customer (likely $AVGO, $MRVL, $CSCO ) - New customer (rules out Intel), prob one of these transitioning to 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers (All speculative, very confidential BOM) Regardless. This timeline is just bottling up for $AEHR. Could be next earnings. Or two quarters from now. But feels like a matter of time before we see mass orders.
-
用生活经验说明 Nike 已经失去吸引力。
$NKE 是个很好的例子，说明要相信你在现实生活中的直觉。 - 如果你发现大家都在穿 Oncloud / New Balance，而不是 Nike - 如果你发现大家都穿 Vuori 或 Lululemon 的短裤，而不是 Nike - 甚至休闲 / 运动服都去买优衣库 / GU，而不是 Nike 那你在本地 Walmart 或 Ross 折扣店里唯一还能看到 Nike 的地方，大概就只有那儿了。 Nike 明显已经失去了它的“酷感”，而当股价是 26 倍前瞻市盈率时，也许市场上还有更好的多头。
英文原文
$NKE is a good lesson to trust your real life instincts. - If you see everyone wearing Oncloud / new balance shoes instead of Nike - You see everyone wearing vuori or lululemon shorts instead of Nike - Even Uniqlo / GU for casual/athletic wear instead of Nike Then the only place you see Nike are at your local Walmart or Ross discount stores. Nike has definitely lost its “cool factor” and when the stock is at 26 fwd p/e, maybe there’s better longs out there.
-
认为 SOI 近似 POET，风险不大。
@Berlinergy @ryansfinance $SOI 很像 $POET 那一类。 它的市价已经接近账面价值了，我个人看不出太大的下行风险。 上行空间更有限，但我觉得未来一年它还是有机会涨 200%。
英文原文
@Berlinergy @ryansfinance $SOI fits in the $POET club. Trading close to book value, don’t see much downside risk personally. Upside is more limited but I can see it going up 200% over the next year.
-
列出几只自己认为有 binary upside 的小票，并对各自风险做了简述。
我觉得在这个位置，$IQE 的二元上行空间最大，而且如果成功重组并转向 InP AI 业务，确实有可能涨 5 到 10 倍。 $POET 的下行风险因为现金资产负债表而比较低。我个人以前不太喜欢它……但如果它能在 Celestial 之外再拿下其他头部合作方，我也能看见它的上行空间。 如果 $AXTI 真的把供应链武器化，我能想象它从 30 亿美元变成 100 亿美元以上。否则的话，现在的估值其实还算合理。 $AAOI 更像是这样：他们能做到吗？能，一年涨 4 倍不是没可能。 我们拭目以待，当然每只也都有下行风险，比如 $IQE 的债务。我的 thesis 只是：按 landmark 相比来看，它们在反应炉 / 底层产能上的原始价值，超过了市值。 我最近没说太多，因为现在都在等新闻。
英文原文
$IQE probably has most binary upside at these levels and legitimately could 5-10x upon successful restructuring and conversion toward InP AI segments. $POET has pretty low downside risk due to cash balance sheet. I personally wasn’t a fan… but I see the upside if they can qualify with other leading partners aside from Celestial. $AXTI if they weaponized their supply chain I can see it being $10B+ from $3B. Otherwise current valuations are reasonable . $AAOI is more so. Can they do it? Yes they can for a 4x in a year. We’ll see what happens, there’s obviously downside risks with each too like $IQE debt. My thesis was just their raw value in terms of reactors/underlying capacity relative to landmark outweighs mc. Haven’t said too much since it’s waiting periods for news
-
反问 AAOI 直连这些巨头客户还有什么更好的客户可言。
@Jornka329996 $AAOI 直接连着 $ORCL、$MSFT、$AMZN，甚至可能还有 $META，还需要什么新客户？ 这大概已经是他们能拿到的最好客户了，哈哈。
英文原文
@Jornka329996 How is $AAOI direct to $ORCL, $MSFT, $AMZN, and maybe $META needing new clients? Those are probably the best they can get lol
-
分析RPI估值偏低，Forward P/E从20.6x降至9.5x，增长58%，AI代理硬件新机遇或带来结构性需求。
$RPI 就 GAAP 前向预测来看确实看起来有点便宜。 - 2026 前向 P/E: $5.29 / $0.256 = 20.6倍 - 2027 前向 P/E: $5.29 / $0.400 = 13.2倍 - 2028 前向 P/E: $5.29 / $0.553 = 9.5倍 基于个人预测。尤其是当你在同比增长 58%（预期会再次上调，因 OpenClaw 的购买）： 当以 2 倍前向市销率交易时，实际上并没有多少溢价。尤其是在 AI 代理硬件(agentic hardware)领域还有新的 TAM 扩张机会。 下行风险是，OpenClaw 只是短期趋势。但 Jensen 在 GTC 上将其验证为下一个重大趋势。 如果这是结构性需求，而 Raspberry Pi 是消费代理硬件领域的 $NVDA……以约 $1B 市值来看，可能是一个绝佳的机会。
英文原文
$RPI does look sort of cheap for GAAP forward projections. - 2026 Forward P/E: $5.29 / $0.256 = 20.6x - 2027 Forward P/E: $5.29 / $0.400 = 13.2x - 2028 Forward P/E: $5.29 / $0.553 = 9.5x Off personal projections. Especially when you’re growing 58% Y/Y (expect this to beat again due to OpenClaw buying): There’s not really much of a premium when it trades at 2x fwd/sales. Especially when theres new TAM expansion opportunities in the AI agentic hardware space. The downside risk is, OpenClaw is just a short term trend. But Jensen did validate it as the next major trend at GTC. If it is structural demand and Raspberry Pi is the $NVDA for consumer agentic hardware… could be a great opportunity at ~$1B MC.
-
等财报验证 thesis 后，RPI 现在估值看起来还不错。
@Test126863 是啊……我已经厌倦了所有噪音，所以就等财报来验证我的 thesis。 现在 $RPI 作为一家 fabless AI 硬件公司，大概只交易在 2 倍前瞻销售。
英文原文
@Test126863 Yeah… got tired of all the noise so just waited for earnings to validate my thesis. Now $RPI is trading at roughly 2 fwd p/s as a fabless ai hardware company.
-
认为 SIVE 在低市值下值得给更高溢价。
@glfikk 也许应该给 100-200% 的溢价，因为 $SIVE 的市值实在太低了。
英文原文
@glfikk Maybe 100-200% premium since $SIVE MC is incredibly low.
-
批评媒体将$RPI误标为散户股，强调其58%增长修正后的基本面价值。
@GeneralMarketx FT和其他新闻媒体那些该死的家伙在用虚假标签制造恐慌。说这是$GME的“散户股领地”而非实际基本面。$RPI在58%的增长预估修正后可能会被大幅重新定价上涨。
英文原文
@GeneralMarketx Actual ****s over at FT, and other news outlets sparking panic with the false labels. Saying it was $GME "Meme stock territory" over actual fundamentals. $RPI is likely going to be repriced upward a lot after the 58% growth estimate revisions.
-
认为被叫 meme stock 的标的最后往往成了大公司，SIVE 会是下一个。
@innovavest 我不知道。所有被散户和媒体贴上“meme stock”标签的我的票，最后都变成了像 $AXTI 这样的十亿美元级公司。 $SIVE 会是下一个，我很有信心。
英文原文
@innovavest Idk. All the retail and news "labelled meme stocks" for my picks ended up becoming billion dollar companies like $AXTI. $SIVE is next, have high confidence.
-
认为若 CPO 在 2026 年下半年到来，自己会继续持有 SIVE。
为什么每个 ticker 都有人一直问我同一个问题。 如果 CPO 的拐点会在 2026 年下半年到来，那我会继续拿着 $SIVE，因为我是在提前布局下一轮光子学变化。 考虑到它只有 2.8 亿美元市值，$AVGO 明天就能把它的光子业务 / IP 买下来，从而控制 $MRVL 的光子路线图……所以我个人除了稀释之外，几乎看不到多少下行风险。
英文原文
Why do people keep asking me this for every single ticker. If CPO inflection is coming in late 2026, I'm holding $SIVE, since I'm frontrunning the next photonics shift. Given it's a $280M MC, $AVGO can just buy their photonics division/IP tomorrow and control $MRVL's photonics roadmap... so I personally don't see much downside risk aside from dilution.
-
认为如果 Shkreli 加入董事会，AXTI 可能会是 100 亿美元公司。
如果 Marin Shkreli 加入 $AXTI 董事会，我觉得它可能会成为一家 100 亿美元以上的公司。 否则的话，我觉得它在这个位置算是比较合理定价，但我个人还是持有的。 它在光子学上对 AI 行业拥有一个垄断性的瓶颈。问题更多是他们会不会通过提价把这种优势武器化？ 考虑到宏观环境，CSP 里卖看跌期权、选低执行价总是个不错的进场方式。
英文原文
If Marin Shkreli joined the board of $AXTI, I think it could be a $10B+ company. Otherwise, it's fairly valued I think around these levels, but I'm personally holding. They own a monopolistic chokepoint over the AI industry with photonics. It's more of a matter of they weaponize it or not with price hikes? Given macro climate, entry via CSP is always a good idea at lower strikes.
-
指出 IREN 的稀释压力远高于 Nebius。
你们觉得 $IREN 还要再摊 56.5 亿美元的稀释吗？ 如果你看多 Neocloud，真的很意外还有人没转去 $NBIS 或其他名字。 一个已经确认拿到 $NVDA 资金和机构可转债支持。 另一个则很可能在通过公开市场持续卖新股，从散户身上筹钱。 残酷的现实是： $IREN 根本无法在不靠这个的情况下把剩余产能变现。这不是“可选性”。 在挑选谁能带来股权升值时，财务结构的细微差别非常重要。 Nebius 的融资结构明显更好，这一点已经反映在年初至今的回报里了。
英文原文
Do you guys think there’s only $5,650,000,000 dilution to go with $IREN? Very surprising that people haven’t switched to $NBIS or other names if you’re long Neoclouds. One already has confirmed funding with $NVDA + convertibles from institutions. The other is likely actively selling new shares on the open market to get funding off retail shareholders. The sad reality is: $IREN simply cannot monetize the rest of their capacity without using that. It’s not “optionality”. Financial structure nuance matters when you’re choosing winners for equity appreciation. Nebius is clearly has the better financing structure and this is already showing up in YTD returns.
-
认为即使大盘再跌，AAOI 也可能跑赢。
@Ungrate11057544 就算 $SPY、$MSFT、$AMZN 再跌 20%，我也还是觉得 $AAOI 会跑赢市场。
英文原文
@Ungrate11057544 Let's just say even if $SPY, $MSFT, $AMZN crashes another 20% I expect $AAOI to outperform the market.
-
称自己刚在 84 美元附近买了 AAOI，觉得 66 亿市值太便宜。
@mi20483980476 我刚刚在大概 84 美元附近买了不少 $AAOI。对我来说，66 亿美元市值实在太便宜了，尤其是在他们有新的 5 亿美元战备资金的情况下。
英文原文
@mi20483980476 I personally bought a decent amount of $AAOI at ~$84 just now, $6.6B MC feels way too cheap for me, especially with their new $500m warchest.
-
认为 AAOI 在宏观不利时也能跑赢，因供给瓶颈和客户会付费。
我其实对大盘是看空的。 不过像 $AAOI 这种个股，我觉得即使宏观环境不好也会跑赢。 如果大家都缺货——即便超大规模客户削减 capex，你在瓶颈环节里还是会遇到同样的问题。 而且光收发器在 BOM 里的占比其实不算其他东西那么高，比如内存，所以他们会愿意付钱。 一句话总结就是挺复杂，但我个人确实觉得 $AAOI 会跑赢宏观环境。
英文原文
I'm actually bearish on the market. However, there's some individual stocks like $AAOI that I expect to outperform despite macro climate. If you're sold out because nobody can make enough... even if hyperscalers cut back capex, you have the same problem in the bottleneck. Also BOM share of optical transceivers is actually not that much compared to others like memory, so they'd happily pay. TLDR pretty nuanced, but I do think $AAOI outpetforms macro climate personally.
-
不喜欢 Jane Street 持有和自己一样的 AAOI，因为他们会放大波动。
这就是为什么我不喜欢 Jane Street 持有和我一样的 $AAOI。 他们是做波动交易的，尤其喜欢搞散户最爱的名字，然后触发止损和恐慌。 但如果你知道自己持有什么： 一家美国公司，6.69 十亿美元市值，做的是整条收发器供应链： 从激光 -> 设计 -> 组装。 如果 $MSFT、$AMZN、$ORCL 这些公司真的会把他们能买的都买了，那对我个人来说，这个价格简直是捡漏。 对高 beta 股票来说，入场前把 conviction 和仓位管理好特别重要。 否则你就会一遍又一遍地在底部割肉、在顶部追高。
英文原文
And... this is why I don't like Jane Street owning the same stocks I do like $AAOI. They trade volatility, especially with retail favorite names and trigger stop losses/panic. If you know what you own though: $6.69B for a US company that makes the entire transceiver supply chain: From Laser -> Design -> Assembly. With likely $MSFT, $AMZN, $ORCL buying anything they can make, is a steal for me personally. With high beta stocks, it's really important to build conviction and manage sizing correctly before entering a trade. Otherwise you'll end up capitulating the bottom and buying the top over and over.
-
认为 MRVL 是长期好票，但 SIVE 作为瓶颈环节会对其增长造成威胁。
@StocksAREnuts $MRVL 确实是一只很好的长期多头。 我只是想分享一下：某个竞争对手如果想卡住它的增长垂直业务线，只需要花 3.5 亿美元买下 $SIVE 这种级别的公司就行。
英文原文
@StocksAREnuts $MRVL is a really good long term long. I’m just sharing thought about how a competitor could potentially chokepoint their growth verticals for a rounding error of $350m with $SIVE
-
认为 Marvell 也许可以用很小成本持有 SIVE 一部分。
@PerDahlstrm $MRVL 其实只要花 3000 万美元买下 $SIVE 的 10% 到 20%，就能把他们十亿美元级别的 CPO 项目稳住。
英文原文
@PerDahlstrm $MRVL can just buy 10-20% of $SIVE for $30m and secure their billion dollar CPO program
-
认为 SIVE 不太可能被 ARM 并购。
@VJNCapital 不会。$SIVE Photonics 作为上游光学组件供应商规模太小了，所以大概率会被放行。 $ARM 的体量则太大，会引发反垄断问题。
英文原文
@VJNCapital Nope. $SIVE photonics is too small as an upstream optical component supplier so would likely pass. $ARM would raise antitrust due to size.
-
Sivers作为稀缺独立cw激光供应商，战略价值远超当前市值估值。
我个人看到 $SIVE 下跌风险较小的原因： 像 $AVGO 这样 $MRVL 的竞争对手可以直接收购 Sivers，从而控制其近中期光子学路线图... 估值约 2.9 亿美元... 如果再便宜一点的话。 Gemini 的回应很有趣： "像 Broadcom 这样以约 2.9 亿美元收购 Sivers Photonics 来扼制 Marvell 新收购的 Celestial AI 路线图不仅仅是战略行为； 这是一场投资回报率高得离谱的供应链战争。" "花点小钱，竞争对手就能控制上游光源，把握直接的 IP 路线图，并让试图整合 Celestial AI 的 Marvell 付出数十亿美元的机会成本。" 对于 $MSFT, AlChip, $MRVL, $AMZN 等超大规模云服务商来说，投资 Sivers 来确保其共封装光学(CPO)供应链可能比让它被竞争对手收购更有利。 就像 $QLCM 与 Alphawave 针对 OpenLight 生态所做的操作一样。 我的观点是：$SIVE 作为全球少数保持独立运营的 cw 激光器供应商之一的关键瓶颈地位... 其固有的价值远超其市值。 对冲基金因「MC」和瑞典交易所上市限制无法投资从而压低估值... 对于收购方或散户投资者来说反而是一种因祸得福。
英文原文
The reason I personally see less downside risk with $SIVE: A competitor to $MRVL like $AVGO can just buy Sivers outright and their near-medium term photonics roadmap… At ~$290m… if it gets any cheaper. Gemini responses were interesting: “ A competitor like Broadcom buying Sivers Photonics for ~$290M to choke Marvell’s newly acquired Celestial AI roadmap isn't just strategic; It is supply chain warfare with an absurdly high ROI. “ “ For pocket change, a competitor could buy the upstream light source, control the immediate IP roadmap, and inflict billions of dollars worth of opportunity cost on Marvell right as they try to integrate Celestial AI “ It’s likely better for hyperscalers like $MSFT, AlChip, $MRVL, $AMZN to invest in Sivers to secure their CPO supply chain then have it being bought out by one of their competitors. Like what happened already with $QLCM and Alphawave for OpenLight. My opinion: $SIVE chokepoint as one of the few projects remaining independent cw laser suppliers in the world… Is inherently way more valuable than their marketcap. Hedge funds not being able to invest due to “MC” and Sweden listing to keep valuations depressed… is a blessing in disguise for both acquisitions or retail investors.