个股论点
围绕单一股票的投资逻辑与仓位表态 · 共 2208 条 · 第 30 / 45 页
-
因地缘政治原则回避小鹏，但认可其与比亚迪的商业价值。
@investingluc @xiaopenghexpeng 出于不资助地缘政治对手的原则，我避开像 $XPEV 这样的中国公司。尤其是在涉及人工智能(AI)和机器人等军事赋能技术时。否则，$XPEV 和 $BYD 都是非常有意思的公司。
英文原文
@investingluc @xiaopenghexpeng I stay away from Chinese companies like $XPEV just out of principle of not funding geopolitical opponents. Especially when it comes to military enabling technology like AI and robotics. Otherwise $XPEV and $BYD are both very interesting companies.
-
作者认为 $CRCL 估值极低，基于其数字美元标准地位，在 $86 大举建仓。
如果 ChatGPT 能结合私人部门稳定币投资经验，撰写 OF 与卡网络之间的对比，我会印象深刻。机构并未对 $31 的价格望而却步，$CRCL 大幅超额认购，且稳定币 GENIUS 法案在 IPO 后通过。如帖中所述，护城河在于其作为结算和数字美元标准的网络效应。尽管可能有 Paxos USD、PayPal USD、SOFI USD 等数百种其他稳定币，但这并不意味着它们能获得广泛采用。USDC 和 USDT 已是双寡头及数字标准。我也提到这是定性论点。对于像 $RKLB 这样非标准公司（如 Circle），我认为不应使用传统估值方法。话虽如此，一家印钞机及数字美元发行商的市值为 $190 亿，被严重低估，我本人在 $86 大举建仓。我只是分享我的论点，你可以自由做反向交易。我鼓励你用行动支持你的观点！
英文原文
I’d be impressed if ChatGPT could write comparisons between OF and card networks alongside personal experiences regarding stablecoin investments in the private sector. Institutions did not balk at $31, $CRCL was vastly oversubscribed and the GENIUS act for stablecoins was passed after IPO. If you read the post, the moat is network effect given its the standard for settlement and digital dollars. There could be hundreds of other stablecoins from Paxos USD, PayPal USD, SOFI USD, and others but that doesn’t mean it will get widespread adoption. USDC and USDT are already the duopoly and digital standard. I also wrote this was the qualitative thesis. On companies like $RKLB that aren’t standard companies (like Circle) I would argue traditional valuation methods shouldn’t be used. That being said, $19B for a money printer and issuer of the currency that’s used for the digital dollar is vastly undervalued and I myself am piling in at $86. I’m just sharing my thesis, you’re free to take the other side of the trade. And I’d encourage you to back up your words!
-
NBIS子公司价值或超IREN市值，仍看好两者。
确实如此。单是 $NBIS 持有的 Clickhouse 和 Avride 股份，在一两年内可能就超过 $IREN 的市值。话虽如此，我依然对两者都持看涨态度。不过有点不公平的是，Nebius 拥有两家源自 Yandex 时代的子公司，其业务正以三位数的同比增速增长。这甚至还没有计入他们的主营业务线。
英文原文
True. Both $NBIS Clickhouse and Avride stakes alone can be worth more than $IREN marketcap in a year or two. That being said I’m still bullish on both. It’s just a bit unfair though Nebius owns 4 subsidiaries from Yandex days growing triple digits y/y. That’s not even accounting for their main business line
-
反驳低利率看空 $CRCL 论点，认为其作为数字美元结算网络价值远超传统估值。
低利率确实会影响 $CRCL，这也是主要的看空论点。然而，低利率环境将释放更多 USDC 的供应，并带来相比高息国债收益更多的交易量/交易性收入。Circle 需要将其交易量的变现能力从利息收入（占其利润的 90% 以上）中剥离出来。我上面的论点是，人们不应将其像金融科技(fintech)公司那样估值。如果它成为数字美联储，且 USDC 成为美元在线结算的实际货币，那么该网络及其发行商的价值将远超传统估值。
英文原文
Low interest rates does affect $CRCL and this is the main bear case thesis. However, low interest rates environments would unlock more supply in USDC + more volume/transactional based revenue compared to high interest from treasuries. Circle would need to monetize transactional volume over interest (which makes up 90%+ of their profits) My argument above is that people shouldn’t value it like a fintech though. If it becomes the digital federal reserve and USDC is the de facto settlement currency of the dollar online, both the network and the issuer is worth way beyond traditional valuations
-
计划研究Maia，已持AAOI作为LITE的杠杆替代。
@itsthesquonky 我今天会对此做一些研究，谢谢提醒。 我已经持有一些微型股，比如 $AAOI，在我看来它只是 $LITE 的杠杆版，仅仅是为了押注 $MSFT Maia 的放量。
英文原文
@itsthesquonky I’ll do some research today on it, thanks for the shout. I’m already into quite a bit of micro caps like $AAOI which is leveraged $LITE imo just for the $MSFT Maia ramp. There’s the conference Jan 6-8 I think which should be a catalyst if Microsoft reveals more news about it
-
质疑 $COIN 估值，认为其交易所业务面临竞争且 USDC 分成优势难保。
关于 $COIN，我略有异议。随着 2026 年与 $CRCL 的合同重新谈判临近，其灵活性远比你想象的低。目前 Coinbase 受益于 50% 的 USDC 收入分成及交易所业务，还有来自托管（如 Blackrock ETFs）的价值。但长期来看，其交易所板块可能会被 $HOOD 和 Bitfinex 等零费率交易所蚕食。至于那 50% 的“金蛋”收入分成：Circle 存在法律漏洞可脱离 Coinbase。我确信 Circle 长期会找到办法。例如，《天才法案》明确禁止稳定币发行方向持有者支付利息 -> 借此合法停止支付分成。或者 50/50 的分成在 2027 年合同谈判中降至 75/25。但你只需 180 亿美元就能获得直接发行商的纯粹非对称收益，而交易所附加部分却需 660 亿美元。
英文原文
For $COIN, slighty disagree. It's a lot less versatile than you think as 2026 contract renegotiation with $CRCL is coming up. Right now Coinbase benefits from 50% USDC rev split + exchange business. Then there's value derived from Custody (eg. Blackrock ETFs). But that exchange segment would likely get cannibalized by $HOOD and zero fee exchanges like Bitfinex in the long run. As for that 50% revenue split of the golden egg: there's legal loopholes for Circle to depeg from Coinbase. And I'm pretty sure Circle will find a way in the long run. Eg. Genius Act, explicitly bans stablecoin issuers from paying interest to holders -> using that to legally stop paying them a split. Or the 50/50 split to drop to something like 75/25 from contract negotiation by 2027. But you can get pure play asymmetry with the direct issuer for $18B or the exchange-add on for $66B.
-
解析Circle商业模式：类银行利差+无限扩展，支撑高估值。
别担心！我乐于免费分享观点，主要是为了帮助他人获得满足感。 我通过市场交易获利，所以个人觉得没必要将粉丝变现。 关于那个问题： $CRCL 的商业模式本质上是金融界的“圣杯”：100% 毛利率，零资本成本，以及无限可扩展性。 它简直是一台不停歇的印钞机，这也是其估值/溢价高的原因。 银行：2-4% 利息的“储蓄账户”。他们以 6% 贷出。利差约 2-4%。 Circle：你持有 USDC 时支付 0% 利息。他们通过国债以约 5% 借给美国政府。他们的利差是完整的约 5%。 我故意简化以解释概念（未计入与 $COIN 的收入分成等细节）： 如果 Circle 流通量（USDC）为 600 亿美元：600 亿 × 5% 收益率 = 每年 30 亿美元无风险收入。 看 Tether，2024 年报告利润约 130 亿美元。他们也仅用不到 100 名员工就实现了这一点。他们拿“免费资金”（用户存款），购买国债（安全 5%）+ BTC。 Circle + Tether 的商业模式可以说是世界上最好的： 从用户那里“印”免费钱，以 X% 借给政府，赚取利差。如果美联储降息至 0%，印钞机不会停，只是像银行一样切换到服务/交易相关收入（但显然会受一点影响）。 如果 USDC 扩展到 1 万亿+ 市值或作为数字化美元事实标准的 2 万亿+，若赚取 5%，利润将达（500-1000 亿美元/年）。 而目前 Circle 市值 180-200 亿美元，流通供应量 770 亿美元。 它也是纯软件，因此可以像 Tether 一样以极少员工扩张，不像银行有极高的 overhead（运营开销）。 所以基本上无限可扩展的商业模式（印钞机）结合极高利润率 = 高估值。
英文原文
No worries! I love sharing my thoughts for free mainly for fulfillment in helping others. I make money through markets so I personally don't see any reason why I would need to monetize followers. As for the question: $CRCL's business model is essentially the "Holy Grail" of finance: 100% gross margins, zero cost of capital, and infinite scalability It's literally a non-stop money printer, which is why it yields high valuation/premiums. Banks: 2-4% interest "savings account". They lend it out at 6%. Margin ~2-4%. Circle: Pays you 0%. (when you hold USDC). They lend it to the US Government (via Treasuries) at ~5%. Their margin is the full ~5%. I've dumbing it down on purpose to explain the concept (not factoring in stuff like revenue split with $COIN) but: If Circle has $60 Billion in circulation (USDC): $60B × 5% yield = $3 Billion/year risk-free revenue. If we look at Tether, in 2024, Tether reported ~$13 Billion in profit. They achieved this with fewer than 100 employees too. They took the "free money" (users' deposits), bought Treasuries (safe 5%) + BTC as well. Circle + Tether business models are arguably the best in the world: Print free money (from users), lend at X% to gov, pocket the spread. If Fed cuts to 0%, the money printer doesn't stop, it just shifts gears like banks to service/TX related revenues (but obviously hurts a bit) If USDC expands to $1T+ marketcap or $2T+ as the the de facto standard for a digitalized dollar, profits will be ($50-$100B /year) if they make 5% off that. And right now Circle is a $18-20B marketcap with $77B circulating supply. It's pure software too, so it can expand off low employee counts like Tether, unlike banks that have extremely high overhead. So basically infinitely scalable business model (money printer) combined with extremely high margins = high valuation.
-
博主在 $CRCL 大跌后建仓，计划长期持有以捕捉上行空间。
谢谢，我等了很久才建立 $CRCL 的长期头寸。我们经历了加密板块清算、流通盘解禁、降息以及高贝塔股票抛售，最终导致股价从高点下跌 70%。现在 Circle 终于回到了一个合理的价位，因此我在股价跌至 $70 时建立了头寸。我最初在 IPO 期间就下了买单，但随后股价涨至 $250+。自那以来有很多积极进展，所以从投资者角度来看，我非常乐意持有并进行多年长期投资。云服务提供商(CSP)策略也不错，但我更贪婪地想要捕捉上行空间。
英文原文
Thanks, I was waiting forever to build long positions on $CRCL. We had crypto sector liquidations, float unlock, interest rate cuts, and high beta stock selloff, finally causing a 70% drop from the highs. Now Circle is finally at a respectable price again, so I built up positions on the drop to $70. I did originally place buy orders during the IPO but then it just went to $250+. There’s been a lot more positive developments since so from an investor’s perspective, very happy hold + multi year long for me. CSPs is also a good strategy, but I’m a little more greedy trying to capture the upside.
-
Circle作为美元数字化延伸，具国家安全和网络效应，建议极度做多。
1000%+ 的 Circle 论点：USDC 与私营部门美联储的崛起。 Circle $CRCL，连同 $NBIS 等标的，是我进入 2026 年高确信度的多头持仓，原因只有一个： Circle 已成为美国财政部的私营部门延伸。 在 180 亿美元市值下。 这是一个 10 倍以上的世代性机会，利用美元变得可编程且纯数字化的货币转变。 Circle 不是一家金融科技(Fintech)公司。它不应像传统公司那样被估值。作为数字印钞机，它是美国政府的国家安全利益。 以下是做多 Circle 的定性理由： 1. Circle 购买美国国债并作为美国财政部的私营部门延伸收取利息。 - 随着 USDC 市值扩张，Circle 购买更多短期美国国债。他们正成为世界上最大的单一美国债务持有者之一。 - 在 BRICS 和其他集团试图去美元化的时代，美国政府需要一种数字美元出口。Circle 将美元霸权瞬间传播给全球任何人，绕过当地银行限制。 - Circle 成为对其他外币（低利率或贬值）的有效“做空” -> 将本地货币转换为 Circle (USD) -> 买入美国债务。 对于 $CRCL：美国政府无法承受 Circle 失败。它拥有传统金融科技所没有的隐性“国家支持”战略护城河。 在 180 亿美元的估值下。 2. 网络效应： Circle + USDC 已经捕获了网络效应。 - 现在有数百种稳定币。Paypal USD, FDUSD, USD1, USDe 以及更多即将推出的。但 Circle + USDC 已经捕获了美国市场的网络效应（USDT 仍在国际上广泛使用）。 现在每个人都用 Circle USDC 结算，无论是 Visa、Stripe、银行还是更多。网络效应是 Meta/Reddit 拥有护城河的原因。也是为什么比特币市值超过 1.5 万亿美元。以及为什么 USDC 不会被新稳定币取代。 USDC 已成为结算、发行和存储的标准，并吞噬了所有以前的结算方法，如 T+2 或更长的 Swift/ACH 轨道。 Circle 在采用和公认的结算基础设施方面确保了终极网络效应。 随着使用量的增长 -> Circle 印更多的钱。 3. 私营到公开的滞后： 很多人不知道，但我私下也帮助硅谷风险投资公司进行尽职调查，针对金融科技种子/A/B 轮投资。 从个人经验来看，我看到创纪录的资金涌入 USDC 相关公司：无论是稳定币新银行（如由 USDC 驱动的 Mecury 银行）还是带有 USDC 的结算基础设施。 当然还有许多关于私营部门收购的公开新闻，例如 Stripe 以 11 亿美元收购 bridge，或银行开始研究 M&A 以创建 USDC 相关产品。 多年前这是 AI，我们看到了从 Anthropic 到 NVDA 在一两年后崛起的成果。 现在是稳定币 + USDC。 公开市场是滞后指标，它们尚未定价 USDC 成为公认结算轨道的必然性（比特币是数字黄金，USDC 是美元/结算）。 我们看到了 Circle 主要因浮动头寸动态而抛售，但我们可能会看到对冲基金试图积累对美元未来印钞机的控制权。 _ $CRCL 不仅仅是一只“加密股票”或“金融科技公司”，也不应像它们那样被估值（尤其是根据降息定价盈利能力）。 它基本上是美国美元的私营部门数字化。 自 GENIUS 法案以来，我们看到像 Circle 这样的公司申请特许状，并将 USDC 有效地连接到联邦储备系统。 现在我们终于看到了新的央行数字货币(CBDC) 的开始，但这次是通过 Circle 发行和私有化。 在 $84（180 亿美元市值）极度做多 Circle，作为地缘政治工具、标准结算货币以及美国财政部的私营部门延伸。
英文原文
The 1000%+ Circle Thesis: USDC and the Rise of a Private-Sector Federal Reserve. Circle $CRCL, alongside names like $NBIS, is now my high-conviction long going into 2026 for one reason: Circle has become the private-sector extension of the US Treasury. At a $18B MC. A 10x+ generational opportunity capitalizing on the monetary shift on the Dollar becoming programmable and purely digital. Circle is not a fintech company. It shouldn't be valued like a traditional one. It's a national security interest of the US Government as the digital money printer. Here's the qualitative reasons to long Circle: 1. Circle Buys US Debt and collects interest as the private-sector extension of the US Treasury. - As USDC market cap expands, Circle buys more short-dated US Treasuries. They are becoming one of the largest single holders of US debt in the world. - In an era where BRICS and other blocs are trying to de-dollarize, the US government needs a digital dollar export. Circle spreads USD hegemony instantly to anyone globally, bypassing local banking restrictions. - Circle becomes an effective "short" against other foreign currencies (with low interest or devaluation) -> convert local currencies to Circle (USD) -> buy into the US debt. For $CRCL: The US government cannot afford to let Circle fail. It has an implicit "state-backed" strategic moat that traditional fintechs do not have. At an $18B valuation. 2. Network effect: Circle + USDC has already captured the network effect. - There's hundreds of stablecoins now. Paypal USD, FDUSD, USD1, USDe, and many more to come. But Circle + USDC has already captured the network effect for the US markets (USDT, is still widely used internationally). Everyone settles with Circle USDC now, whether that's Visa, Stripe, Banks, or more. The network effect is why Meta/Reddit have their moats. Or why Bitcoin has a 1.5T+ market cap. And exactly why USDC won't be displaced by new stablecoins. USDC has already become the standard for settlement, issuance, storage, and cannibalizes all former settlement methods from T+2 or more rails such as Swift/ACH. Circle has secured the ultimate network effect both in adoption + agreed upon settlement infrastructure. With this, as more usage grows -> Circle prints more money. 3. The Private-to-Public Lag: Lot of people don't know but I help SV venture capital firms with DD as well for fintech Seed/Series A/B type investments on the side. From personal experience, I've seen a record breaking amount of funding pour into USDC-related companies: whether that's Stablecoin Neobanks (banks like Mecury, just powered by USDC) or settlement infrastructure with USDC. And of course many public-news about private sector acquisitions such as Stripe acquisition of bridge for $1.1B or Banks starting to look into M&A to create USDC related products. Many years ago this was AI and we've seen it come into fruition from Anthropic to NVDA's rise a year or two later. Now it's stablecoins + USDC. Public markets are lagging indicators and they haven't priced in the inevitability of USDC becoming the agreed upon settlement rail (Bitcoin for digital gold, USDC for USD/settlement). We've seen a selloff of Circle mainly due to float dynamics, but we'll likely see hedge funds try and accumulate control of the future money printer of the USD. _ $CRCL isn't just a "crypto stock" or "fintech company" and shouldn't be valued like one (especially pricing profitability from interest rates cuts). It's basically the private sector digitization of the US dollar. Ever since the GENIUS act, we're seeing companies like Circle file for charters, and effectively connect USDC into the federal reserve system. And now we're finally seeing the start of a new Central Bank Digital Currency, but this time issued and privatized through Circle. Go extraordinarily long on Circle at $84 ($18B MC) as both a geopolitical instrument, standard settlement currency, and as the private sector extension of US Treasury.
-
重申NBIS长期看涨至250美元，对期权亏损致歉。
是的，我一个月前说 $NBIS 即使在 130 美元时也是极强的买入标的，这一观点我至今仍坚持，如果它交易在 125 美元我会买入。我认为跌至 75 美元就像 $HOOD 在关税恐慌中跌至 28 美元然后随着散户投降涨至 100 美元以上那样。如果人们跟随我的 Nebius 论点使用本月到期的期权，我感到非常内疚。我自己也因下跌在 3 月/5 月到期的期权上损失惨重。但中长期我相信一旦他们在 2026 年实现管理层预测，$NBIS 轻松突破 250 美元。
英文原文
Yep, you’re correct when I said that $NBIS is an extremely strong buy even at $130 a month ago. I still maintain that today, and would be buying Nebius if it were trading at $125. I believe the drop to $75 is like the moment when $HOOD dropped to $28 during tariff fears then went to $100+ when retail capitulated. I do feel extremely guilty if people followed my thesis on Nebius with options that expired this month. I lost a lot of money myself so far on March/May expiry options from the drop. But medium-long term I believe $NBIS easily blows past $250 once they achieve management projections in 2026
-
作者认为AAOI和POET虽具十倍潜力但因执行风险未去风险化，不属于高确信度标的。
对我个人而言：当一家公司在根本上已“去风险化(de-risked)”并正从该点迈向规模化时，我才视其为“高确信度(high conviction)”标的。 例如，$NBIS 在与微软达成交易后。在光子学(photonics)领域，我个人更看好 $AAOI 而非 $POET。但它们都尚未“去风险化”。 正如你提到的，Poet 受益于 Celestial（已被 $MRVL 收购）。Marvell 基本上通过 Celestial 向超大规模云厂商(hyperscalers)出售 Poet 的中介层(interposer)，用于连接 TPU/Trainium。 但这中间隔着多层环节。 $AAOI 已经拥有与超大规模云厂商的直接合同，例如与 $AMZN 合作 Trainium，与 $MSFT 合作 Maia。此外还有类似 $ALAB 与亚马逊那样的股权协议。 然而，它们实现了完全垂直整合且工厂建在德克萨斯州。如果能让整个供应链在美国实现规模化并完美执行，它们有巨大的10倍增长潜力。 但由于相比 $COHR 规模较小，$AAOI 存在巨大的执行风险，因此不属于高确信度标的。$POET 同理，目前尚无让我完全确信的去风险化因素。 不过，Poet 和 AAOI 都是具备10倍潜力的光子学标的，这也是我持仓部分 $AAOI 的原因，但它们都不属于高确信度投资。
英文原文
For me personally: A stock is "high conviction" when they are fundamentally de-risked and are going from that point to scale. For example, $NBIS post-MSFT deal. I like $AAOI much better than $POET in the photonics space personally. But neither of them are "de-risked yet". So Poet as you mentioned, benefits from Celestial, which got acquired $MRVL. Marvell basically sells Poet's interposer via Celestial to hyperscalers for connecting tpus/trainium. But this is via multiple hops away. $AAOI already had direct hyperscaler contracts like $AMZN for Trainium + $MSFT for Maia. And equity agreements like what $ALAB has for Amazon. However, they're fully vertically integrated + built in Texas. They have a pretty big potential to 10X if they can get the whole supply chain to scale in America + perfect execution. But because they're at lower scale compared to $COHR, $AAOI has huge execution risk + it's not high-conviction. Same with $POET, there's no de-risking factor yet that would make me fully convinced. However, Poet and AAOI are both photonics plays that can 10x, which is why I have some $AAOI in my portfolio, but neither are high conviction.
-
通过对比 IREN 缺乏核心 AI 资产，论证 NBIS 的竞争优势。
我会用一个关于 $NBIS 与 $IREN 的问题来回答你的问题。 IREN 是否拥有： - 一家由 Uber 规模化运营的 FSD（完全自动驾驶）L4 级 Robotaxi（自动驾驶出租车）公司 - 一家被从 Tesla 到 Meta 等所有顶级公司使用的 DB（数据库）公司 - 一家被 Amazon、Anthropic 等使用的 AI 标注公司？ 这些业务是否都随着 Nebius 的主营业务实现了 100%+ 的同比增长？
英文原文
I will answer your question with a question regarding $NBIS vs $IREN. Does IREN have a: - FSD lvl4 robotaxi company scaled by Uber - a DB company used by every single top company from Tesla to Meta - an AI labeling company used by Amazon, Anthropic and others? Each growing 100%+ Y/Y alongside Nebius's main business?
-
说明稳定币与 BTC 下行周期相对隔离
好问题。稳定币其实和 BTC 下跌趋势是分开的，尽管算法层面会影响该行业公司/资产的市值。 即使加密价格下跌，USDC/Tether 的供应量也会增加。机构会在加密下行周期中把 BTC 卖成 USDT/USDC，而不是放在银行账户里。 尤其现在在风投领域，Lightspeed、Sequoia 等都在把钱投向和稳定币相关的公司，比如 neobank；其中很多投资会在 6 个月到 1 年后开始产生回报。 我会在另一篇帖子里写更深入的 thesis，但总体上，我看好稳定币和 Bitcoin；即使 Bitcoin 处于下行趋势，稳定币和发行方也是相对隔离的。
英文原文
Good question, stablecoins are actually separate from the BTC downtrend, even though algorithmically this affects the marketcaps of companies/assets in the sector. USDC/Tether increases in supply even as crypto prices go down. Institutions sell BTC for USDT/USDC while crypto is in a downtrend instead of holding it in bank accounts. Especially in venture capital right now, lightspeed/sequioa/etc. are pouring money into stablecoin related companies like Neobanks, and lot of these investments pay dividends 6 months.-1 year later. I'll write up a more in-depth thesis in another post but generally, I'm bullish on stablecoins and Bitcoin, and even if Bitcoin is in a downtrend, stablecoins + issuers are isolated.
-
列出 Circle 的几个主要空头情景
几个空头情景： - 美联储推出自己的 CBDC，比如 Fed Coin，或者推出另一个稳定币来直接竞争。 - 美联储继续降息到 1%，而 $CRCL 必须不断印 USDC 来弥补收入损失。 - 监管，比如下一届政府任命 Gary Gensler 这类人物，或者 USDC 在其他国家被禁。 但如果事情继续按现在的方向发展，Circle 未来应该是一家 500 亿美元以上的公司。
英文原文
Few bear cases: - Fed creates it's own CBDC like Fed Coin or another stablecoin to compete directly. - Fed keeps cutting rates down to 1% and $CRCL needs to keep printing USDC to make up for lost revenue. - Regulation - eg. next administration puts in a gary gensler or usdc gets banned in other countries But if things go the way they're going now, Circle deserves to be a $50B+ company down the road.
-
解释此前回避 Circle 是因为流通盘动态，现在重新看多
可以。所以我之前一直说，在 Circle 市值 600 亿美元时，要避开 Circle，或者做空 $CRCL、做多 $COIN。 原因是大家没理解流通盘动态。 大部分流通股被锁定，不能卖，类似于 BULL IPO。等流通股释放后，Circle 股价就崩了。 降息也会伤害稳定币铸币利息带来的盈利能力，但流通盘动态才是压倒性的最大因素。 我一直看好 USDC，但市值非常关键。现在它回到 180 亿美元，就变成了极强的买入机会。
英文原文
Sure, so I've been saying avoid Circle or short $CRCL long $COIN when Circle was trading at a $60B marketcap. This was because people didn't understand float dynamics. Majority of the float was locked up and couldn't be sold, similar to BULL IPO. When float was released, the price on Circle crashed. There's stuff like rate cuts too hurting profitability from interest on minted stablecoins, but float dynamics was the biggest factor by a longshot. I've always been bullish on USDC, but market cap plays a huge role. Now it's an extraordinarily strong buy back at $18B
-
认为 USDC 已成为结算标准，价值远超当前估值
$CRCL 是稳定币，和 Ethereum 或 Solana 这类 L1 没什么关系，因为它们并不重要。 thesis 在于，它正在成为一种结算标准（Visa、PayPal、YouTube 等），而这种网络效应的价值远远超过它 170 亿美元的估值。 这既符合美国政府把更多人纳入美元/美国债务体系的战略利益，也符合全球公司的利益。 人们当然可以铸造 PayPal USD、Paxos USD 等，但 USDC 基本已经成了大家认可的标准，这一点极其、极其有价值。
英文原文
$CRCL is stablecoins, has nothing to do with L1s like Ethereum or Solana since it doesn’t matter. Thesis involves that it’s becoming just a standard for settlement (visa, PayPal, YouTube, etc.) and that network effect is worth infinitely more than its $17B valuation both in us government strategic interest to get people into the US dollar/debt system as well as the global companies. People can mint PayPal usd, paxos usd, etc but USDC has basically become the agreed upon standard and this is incredibly, incredibly valuable.
-
比较一组高增长标的的高估和低估程度
所以我会说，$RKLB 现在肯定是最被高估的。 $LITE 正接近超买区间，但考虑到它在 TPUv7、Trainium 和 Blackwell 芯片中的关键性，它确实值得重估。 $NBIS 和 $CRCL 是这组里最被低估的，然后是 $ALAB。
英文原文
So I’d say $RKLB is definitely the most overvalued right now. $LITE is edging toward the overbought territory but it definitely warrants a re-rating given how critical it is in TPUv7, Trainium, and Blackwell chips. $NBIS and $CRCL are most undervalued out of the bunch, then goes $ALAB.
-
列出更稳的十倍股和小盘 moonshot
如果说“更安全”的 10 倍股，我会说未来 5 年是 $RKLB 和 $NBIS。 我完全能想象 Rocket Lab 有一天到 3000 亿美元估值，Nebius 到 2000 亿美元估值。 市值越小，10 倍概率越高（比如低于 20 亿美元）。显然，对 $HOOD 这类公司来说，一年翻倍要难得多。 但在小盘股里，$AAOI、$WLAC 和 $TE 是我喜欢小仓位参与的那类 moonshot。
英文原文
So for a “safer” 10x. I’d say $RKLB and $NBIS next 5 years. I could definitely see Rocketlab at $300B valuation and Nebius at $200B one day. The chance of a 10x increases the smaller marketcap they are (eg. Sub $2B), and it’s obviously much harder for companies like $HOOD to double in a year. But for smaller caps, $AAOI, $WLAC, and $TE are those types of moonshots I like to dabble in.
-
公布 2026 年五只高信念多倍股
我在个人组合的极端增长高信念篮子里新增了 2 只股票。 在更长时间框架上，我对高信念股票从来没错过（比如 $HOOD 从 18 美元到 100+ 美元）。 我 2026 年的 5 只高信念多倍股现在是： $NBIS - AI 算力和 Robotaxi $RKLB - 太空 $ALAB - 连接 新增的两只是： $CRCL - 印钞机 $LITE - hyperscaler ASIC 我后面会写 Circle 和 Lite 的更长 DD thesis。 我有信心，只持有这 5 只，就会大幅跑赢 99.9% 的组合。
英文原文
I’ve added 2 new stocks to my extreme growth high conviction basket in my personal portfolio. I’ve never been wrong before about high conviction stocks on longer timeframes (eg. $HOOD $18 -> $100+) My 5 high conviction multi-bagger stocks for 2026 are now: $NBIS - AI Compute and Robotaxis $RKLB - Space $ALAB - Connectivity And the two new ones are: $CRCL - Money Printer $LITE - Hyperscaler ASICs I’ll do longer DD thesis on Circle and Lite on follow ups. I’m confident having just these 5 will heavily outperform 99.9% of portfolios.
-
称 NBIS 即使更高也想买，但现金不足
@soulbiri1 对。如果 $NBIS 今天是 135 美元，我还是会买；但很遗憾，在下跌尾端我已经没有足够干火药继续部署了。 最后我买了光子玩家和 Circle 的长期仓位。
英文原文
@soulbiri1 Yep. If $NBIS was $135 today I’d still buying - but ran out of dry capital to deploy on the full tail end of the drop sadly. Ended up buying long term positions in photonics players and Circle though
-
认为 Nebius 基本面没变，情绪转向且收购叙事增强
像 $NBIS 这样的公司，基本面没有任何变化（除了继续改善）。变化的只是市场情绪突然切换了。 但现在，Wedbush 的 Dan Ives 这样的人突然出来说：“Nebius 可能在 2026 年被 $GOOGL、$MSFT、$AMZN 这样的 hyperscaler 收购”，这极其利多。
英文原文
Nothings fundamentally changed (aside from improving) about companies like $NBIS. Aside from the sentiment flipping the switch. But suddenly we have people like Dan Ives from Wedbush going out and saying "Nebius likely gets acquired by a hyperscaler like $GOOGL, $MSFT, $AMZN " in 2026, which is incredibly bullish.
-
认为 TAE 若商业化聚变，DJT 估值上限很高
@Toy0tomi_H TAE 是硅谷聚变能源的皇冠明珠，所以它要和 $DJT 合并的消息真的让我措手不及。 如果 TAE 到 2030 年成功商业化聚变，1000 亿美元以上估值都算极其保守，哈哈。
英文原文
@Toy0tomi_H TAE is silicon valley's crown jewel for fusion energy, so the news about merging with $DJT really caught me off guard. If TAE successfully commercializes fusion by 2030, $100B+ is extremely conservative lol.
-
梳理 DJT 从社交媒体到聚变收购的荒诞估值难题
$DJT 刚刚变成股票市场的皇冠明珠了吗？ 我真的难以置信： 1. 被 X/Meta 封禁 2. IPO 一个社交媒体创业公司 3. 卖圣经、西装和运动鞋 4. 成为美国总统 5. 卖 10 万美元陀飞轮手表 6. 发行 memecoin 7. 发行 crypto ETF 8. 购入数十亿美元 Bitcoin 并建立战略储备 9. 发行 USD1 稳定币 10. 收购 Google 宠爱的核聚变公司，而且它恰好是世界领导者 （Google 真的派工程师去帮 TAE 反应堆稳定等离子体，高盛也是投资者） -> 股价上涨 46%。 $DJT 现在因为 TAE 真的变得可投资了吗（可能还结合总统审批来加速监管通关）？ 市场是不是正难以置信地看着下一个 Microsoft 形成？ 给 Trump 的公司估值，真是一个绝对头疼的问题。
英文原文
Did $DJT just become the crown jewel of the stock market? I’m genuinely in disbelief: 1. Get Banned from X/Meta 2. IPO social media startup 3. Sell Bibles, Suits, and Sneakers 4. Become US President 5. Sell $100K Tourbillion Watches 6. Launch memecoin 7. Launch crypto ETFs 8. Acquire billions in Bitcoin and build a strategic reserve 9. Launch USD1 Stablecoin 10. Acquire Google-Darling Nuclear Fusion company that’s happens to be the world leader. (Google literally sent their engineers to stabilize plasma in TAE’s reactors + Goldman Sachs are investors) -> Send stock up 46%. Did $DJT actually investable now with TAE (likely combing president approval for speed running regulation)? And are markets watching in disbelief of the next Microsoft in making? How you value Trump’s company is an absolute headache.
-
NBIS 从 140 跌到 80 令人意外，但仍不卖
@soulbiri1 我心里的 WSB 赌徒正在低声说：卖掉一切，加杠杆满仓 $NBIS。 不过从 140 美元跌到 80 美元确实非常令人意外，很难相信它还能比这低很多。 我不会卖！
英文原文
@soulbiri1 The WSB degen inside of me is whispering sell everything and full port $NBIS on margin. The drop from $140 to $80 though was extremely surprising and it's hard to believe it goes a lot lower than this. I'm not selling!
-
认为有资金时这是买入机会，否则持有
@nectarbuffs 对，如果你还有资金，这是很好的买入机会。否则就持有。 看起来 $IREN 刚刚躲过了反向 Cramer。
英文原文
@nectarbuffs Yeah this is an incredible buying opportunity if you still have capital. Otherwise, just hold. Looks like $IREN just got saved from the inverse Cramer. https://t.co/YRuRaUGTIv
-
认为 Neocloud 板块在长期合同去风险后仍被错杀
同意。 像 $CIFR 这样的公司，现在交易得仿佛 $AMZN、$GOOGL 的合同从未发生过。 在整个 Neocloud 板块里，我们看到的是一场崩盘，尽管 Mag7 合同已经让全板块去风险，并提供了长期收入可见性。 $ORCL、$CRWV 以及一些个股因为 OpenAI 敞口而下跌是有道理的，但它把板块其他公司也一起拖下去了。
英文原文
Agreed. Companies like $CIFR are trading like the $AMZN, $GOOGL deals never happened. In the whole Neocloud sector, we’re seeing a crash despite de-risking and long term revenue visibility across the board with Mag7 contracts. $ORCL, $CRWV, and some individual names made sense given OpenAI exposure but it just dragged the rest of the sector alongside it.
-
认为市场严重低估 NBIS 与 IREN 的长期资产价值
市场现在把一家前瞻 ARR 80 亿美元、EBIT 利润率 20-30% 的公司估到 190 亿美元。 而且它还有： - 4 个独立子公司，从 robotaxi 到数据库，都在以三位数同比增长。 （其中两个在 1-2 年牛市情景下，单独价值可能就超过当前总市值。） 至于 $IREN，市场突然忘记了容量对 hyperscaler 来说曾经是多大的瓶颈。 市场止痛药吃太多了。
英文原文
Market is valuing a forward $8B ARR company, 20-30% EBIT margin company with: - 4 separate subsidaries from robotaxi companies to DBs all growing triple digits Y/Y. (Two of which can be worth more than the current market cap in a 1-2 year bull case) At $19B. As for $IREN, markets are suddenly forgetting how much capacity was a bottleneck for hyperscalers. Market is taking too much Tylenol.
-
担忧 NBIS ATM 稀释，但认为情绪极低时可能适合买入
$NBIS 的 ATM 发行规模很大，所以可能会持续很长时间。 我真的希望 $NBIS 管理层能战略性地使用它，而不是在被做空期间卖。 现在股东只能相信管理层不会无限稀释，也不会在此时继续增加卖压。 80 美元的股价甚至已经包含 MSCI 流入之后的情况。 $NBIS、$IREN、$CIFR 以及整个 Neocloud 板块情绪都极低，所以如果你还有资金，这可能就是理想买点。
英文原文
$NBIS ATM offering would probably be around for a long time given the size. I really hope $NBIS management does this strategically and not during periods of short selling. Shareholders are just trusting management not to endlessly dilute + add selling pressure at this point. The $80 stock price is even post-MSCI inflows too. $NBIS, $IREN, $CIFR and other sentiment for Neocloud sector is extremely low so probably this was the ideal time to buy if you still have capital.
-
解释 NBIS/IREN 下跌来自稀释、做空、板块恐慌和散户投降
主要因素是 $NBIS 和 $IREN 的稀释。除此之外，很大程度上是情绪和价格。 不幸的是，$NBIS 有一个 20 亿美元以上的 ATM 正在运行，他们一直在公开市场出售。 再叠加机构空头头寸，再叠加行业龙头 $ORCL 的恐惧，最后是散户在底部投降。 于是你就得到现在的股价，尽管业务基本面还在改善。
英文原文
Well, the main factor is dilution for $NBIS and $IREN. But otherwise it’s largely sentiment and price. Unfortunately $NBIS has a $2B+ ATM running that they’ve been selling on the open market. Then combine that with institutional short positions. And then sector leader $ORCL fears. Then retail capitulation at the bottom. And you get get current stock price. Despite business fundamentals improving.
-
认为 NBIS 在多项重大合同后仍按困境资产交易
我指的是，$NBIS 宣布 Microsoft 合同时，股价大概在 90-100 美元，之后涨到 140 美元。合同前是 65-75 美元。 现在，在 $MSFT 190 亿美元合同、$META 30 亿美元合同、以色列政府合同、Cursor/Accenture、$UBER Avride robotaxi 上线 + 3.75 亿美元投资轮等等之后，我们又回到了 80 美元。 Nebius 现在交易得像一只困境资产。
英文原文
Meant when $NBIS annnounced the Microsoft contract they were trading around $90-$100 before rallying to $140. Pre contract it was $65-$75. Now we’re back at $80 after $MSFT 19B deal, $META $3B deal, Israel gov deal, Cursor/Accenture, $UBER avride robotaxi launch + $375m investment round, and so on. Nebius is trading like a distressed asset right now
-
惊讶 NBIS 和 IREN 回到 Mag7 合同前更低水平
真没想到我还能再看到 $NBIS 到 80 美元，或 $IREN 到 35 美元。 它们现在的交易价格，比最初宣布 Mag7 合同的时候还低很多。
英文原文
Never thought I’d see $NBIS at $80 or $IREN at $35 again. They’re both trading a lot lower than when they first announced Mag7 contracts. https://t.co/boqDYeyXzL
-
分析 robotaxi 对 Uber 的威胁取决于合作方是否竞争
不同意，但这很有细节。 如果是 Waymo，Robotaxi 会毁掉 $UBER 的商业模式。 Uber 大概已经意识到，任何和 Waymo 的连接，最终都会把用户导向 Waymo 的直接应用，而这个应用有一天会替代/绕开 Uber。$GOOGL 完全有能力补贴利用率。 因此，$NBIS Avride 在德州和 Uber 的上线，就是聚合器模式的好例子：他们允许乘客匹配到一家非竞争性 Robotaxi 公司的车，而 Uber 还部分持有这家公司。 这实际上会让 Uber 应用受益。 如果 $UBER 打好牌，Robotaxi 不会杀死它；但如果 Uber 允许 Waymo 和 Tesla 这种有直接竞争应用的公司匹配客户，并把自己的用户导向竞争应用，那 Waymo 和 Tesla 会杀死它。
英文原文
Disagree, but it’s nuanced. Robotaxis will ruin $UBER’s business model if it’s Waymo. Uber likely realizes that every link with Waymo will eventually funnel into Waymo’s direct app that will replace/sidestep Uber one day. $GOOGL has no problems subsidizing utilization. Hence $NBIS Avride Texas launch with Uber is a good example of the aggregator model where they allow riders to match with robotaxis of a non-competitive Robotaxi company that they partially own. And this actually benefits the app. Robotaxis won’t kill if $UBER plays their cards right, but Waymo and Tesla (with direct competitor apps) will if Uber allows customer matching with them + serves as a funnel for their users unto competing apps.
-
仍看多 NBIS，认为 MSFT/META 合同提供中期防御性
我仍然看多。人们似乎忘了，$NBIS 和 $MSFT、$META 的合同覆盖超过半个十年，100% 利用率，总合同规模 220 亿美元。 它们有很强的中期防御性，包括 Cursor 或 $NET 这样的企业用户。 太空中的数据中心目前更像量子一样，是偏近期探索性质，还不是广泛商业化的算力来源。 话虽如此，如果 $NBIS 也拥有一家太空公司子公司，我也不会惊讶，毕竟它们已经有自动驾驶汽车子公司了，哈哈。
英文原文
Still bullish. People seem to forget the $MSFT and $META deals for $NBIS are over half a decade, 100% utilization, and $22 Billion in contract size. They have great medium term defensibility, including all their enterprise users like Cursor or $NET. DCs in space is more near-term exploratory like quantum right now, not exactly widely commercializable and a source for compute yet. That being said I wouldn’t be surprised if $NBIS also owns a space company subsidiary given then already have self-driving car ones lol.
-
提醒不要被评论吓跑，称这是正当复苏
@wealthmatica 嗯，别被评论区吓跑了，这确实是一个正当的复苏，只是现在还早。 我之前已经按成本结构和它带来的 FCF 提升算过了。
英文原文
@wealthmatica Eh don’t let the commenters scare you off, it’s a legitimate recovery but right now. Did the math earlier in cost structure + FCF boost from it https://t.co/vuJfLCh80l
-
看好 SNAP 低估但反驳存储付费采用率过高假设
兄弟，我也一直在发 $SNAP 多头帖，但 memories 变现的采用率大概最多也就是低个位数。 大多数人的使用量并没有超过 5GB。 那 9.43 亿月活用户里，怎么可能有 80% 甚至 25%（你上个帖子里的说法）的人为额外存储付费？ 而且它一直是代际财富毁灭机。 话虽如此，现在它确实被低估了；2% 的采用率就会带来巨大的收入增量。 但人们漏掉的核心，是从 GCP 成本削减带来的 opex 下降，比如那些 9GB 浪费的热狗视频。
英文原文
Bruh, I’ve been bull posting $SNAP too but adoption rate of memory monetization is probably single low digit at best. Majority of people don’t have over 5 GB used. So how are majority of 80% or even 25% (from your previous post) of the 943M monthly users paying for extra storage? Also it’s been a generational wealth destroyer. That being said it’s undervalued right now, 2% adoption leads to a huge increase in revenue but the core thing people miss is opex cuts from GCP costs from 9 GB wasteful hotdog videos.
-
AVGO财报被误读，AI逻辑未变，大跌提供买入良机。
我对 $AVGO 财报的解读是，市场主要误解了其积压订单(backlog)数据。关于 $NVDA GPU 生态系统和 Mag7 ASIC 生态系统的 AI 交易整体逻辑依然成立，但市场却将其视为泡沫破裂+严重不及预期。我们正经历从“AI是下一个大趋势”到“AI是泡沫”，再到“AI是下一个大趋势”，最后又回到“AI是泡沫”的循环。波动性和13%以上的跌幅使得多只股票成为良好的买入机会。
英文原文
So my takeaway from $AVGO earnings is that it's mainly misunderstood backlog numbers. Overall thesis on AI trade from $NVDA GPU ecosystem and Mag7 ASIC ecosystem is in-tact but the market is treating it like a bubble popping + terrible miss. We're just going from AI is the next big thing -> Ai is a bubble -> AI is the next big thing -> AI is a bubble. Volatility and -13%+ drops makes several names a good buy.
-
研究博通财报及ASIC需求外溢，计划加仓光电子股LITE。
@DigestingX 我正在研究 $AVGO 的财报，以及专用集成电路(ASIC)需求外溢至光电子(Photonics)领域如 $LITE 的情况！ 我想增加我的 $LITE 仓位，因为那目前是我持仓中占比最低的，所以正如你提到的，这可能是一个买入机会。
英文原文
@DigestingX I'm researching $AVGO earnings right now and ASIC demand spillover to photonics like $LITE! I wanted to add to my $LITE position since that was my lowest right now, so might be a buying opportunity as you mentioned.
-
批评Snap AR战略失误，但认可其降本举措，认为当前估值具备投资价值。
这个观点很有趣，但我不同意。鉴于$SNAP在增强现实(AR)开发上的资本支出(capex)如此之高，它本应像$META放弃元宇宙(Metaverse)那样直接砍掉所有AR开发。 他们本应直接宣称：“我们是一家社交媒体公司”，并利用自由现金流(FCF)收购类似早期Facebook的社交媒体公司（而非硬件公司），从而与TikTok/Meta竞争。 如果当初这么做，$SNAP现在市值早已超过800亿美元。然而多年来他们未能产生更多自由现金流，这简直愚蠢至极，也证明了CEO及其愿景有多糟糕。 但他们确实做了一件事，即我原本希望Evan去做的：削减谷歌云(GCP)成本并像iCloud那样对“回忆”功能进行货币化，他们确实做到了。 尽管我认为这是一家管理极差的公司，但我认为从估值角度看，它现在是一个不错的投资标的。
英文原文
Interesting take but I disagree. $SNAP should have just scrapped any AR development (like $META for Metaverse) given how much capex spend it is. And just went out and say: "We're a social media company" + compete vs Tiktok/Meta by acquiring social media companies like early stage Facebook (instead of hardware ones) with FCF. $SNAP would have been a $80B+ company by now but the fact they're not producing more FCF after all these years is just incredibly stupid and a testament to how bad the CEO + vision is. But they did the one thing I wanted Evan to do which was cut GCP costs and monetize memories like ICloud, which they did. Even though I think it's a terribly run company I think it's a good investment now for the valuation.
-
看好$SNAP因降本增效及AI收入，预计2026-27年有100%+涨幅。
$SNAP 在 7.64 美元时被极度低估。 -> Snapchat 通过转向 GCP 削减运营支出，并将其转化为收入。 -> Perplexity 交易在现有收入基础上增加了 4 亿美元股权/现金。 预计这些变化带来的净自由现金流(Net FCF)在 2026 年底至 2027 年初将达到 +6.3 亿美元（+1.9 亿运营云支出节省，+5.4 亿内存收入，-1 亿存储成本）。 CEO 出售 1000 万美元股票并不重要，尤其是当有 5 亿美元回购时。 $SNAP 不需要成为 $META，它永远不会是。 在 130 亿美元市值下，它只需要削减成本并改善来自其 15-20 亿美元季度收入（~55% 毛利率）的自由现金流。 那么即使用户增长放缓或轻微下降，它也将获得巨大的重估。 目前税务收割(tax harvesting)可能在未来两周结束。但如果你能等待整整一年，我有信心一旦计入 GCP 运营支出削减和 AI 收入流，Snap 将大幅跑赢任何指数。 进入 2026-2027 年，这里有 100%+ 的上行空间。
英文原文
$SNAP is incredibly undervalued at $7.64. -> Snapchat cutting opex costs with GCP and converting that to revenue. -> Perplexity deal adding $400m in equity/cash on top of existing revenue. Net FCF Is estimate from these changes is +$630M (+$190M opex cloud, memory revenue +540M, storage cogs -$100m) late 2026, early 2027. The CEO selling $10M in shares is not material, especially when there's $500M in buybacks. $SNAP doesn't need to be $META, it never will. At a $13B marketcap, it just needs to cut costs and improve FCF from its $1.5B-$2B quarterly revenue (~55% gross profit margins). Then it will be re-rated immensely, even if user counts slows or slightly drops. Right now tax harvesting is likely ending next two weeks. But if you can wait a whole year, I'm confident Snap will strongly outperform any index once we factor in GCP opex cuts and AI revenue streams. 100%%+ upside here going into 2026 - early 2027.
-
看好AAOI中期潜力，因ASIC生态关键地位及美国制造优势，但暂小仓位以控风险。
是的，我非常非常喜欢 $LITE，但它的高估值溢价已经被市场充分定价。 我仅在 $AAOI 上持有相对较小的仓位，主要是出于执行风险的考虑：万一超大规模云厂商取消采购订单，或者面临捷普(Jabil)的竞争。 话虽如此，它目前被市场当作一家小型组件制造商来定价，但实际上它受益于微软(Microsoft) Maia 和亚马逊(Amazon) Trainium 的 AI 芯片量产，且“美国制造”是其强劲驱动力，因为它在超大规模云厂商的专用集成电路(ASIC)生态系统中扮演着关键角色。 这只是一项基于定性分析的投资，依据诸如 30-35% 的毛利率等粗略估算，以及假设其因 2026 年超大规模云厂商的放量而超越市场预期。 不过，其市值足够小，足以让我将其作为中期投资标的。
英文原文
Yeah I really, really like $LITE but it’s already priced in with a premium. I only have relatively small positions in $AAOI though just because of execution risk in case a hyperscaler drops purchase orders + competition from Jabil. That being said it’s priced as a small cap component manufacturer but has AI $MSFT Maia $AMZN trainium ramp and made in America as a great driver since it plays a critical part in the hyperscaler ASIC ecosystem. This is just a qualitative investment, off rough estimates like 30-35% margins and assumptions of beating projections due to hyperscaler ramp in 2026. The marketcap is small enough to make me an investor for medium term though.
-
分析AAOI依赖Mag7的垂直整合优势，已建仓并看好LITE。
我原本在研究一篇来自 Semianalysis 的文章中关于 $AMZN Trainium 基准测试以及亚马逊供应链的内容。鉴于一些朋友（如 @yianisz）之前曾对此发帖讨论，我决定深入挖掘。亚马逊在扩大 Trainium/Inferentia 集群时提供了约 40 亿美元的支出作为后盾，加上 $MSFT 在 ASIC 集群上的投入，随着行业向 800G 升级，我们很可能会看到更多超大规模云厂商客户。对于一家市值 25 亿美元的公司来说，如此依赖 Mag7 的情况实属罕见 lol。下行风险与积极因素并存：由于激光器在德克萨斯州内置生产，该公司实现了垂直整合（更高利润率）。我看好未来巨大的量增需求，但：关键在于执行，他们必须在不搞砸的情况下建成 800G/1.6T 光收发器。我已经全仓持有 $AAOI，出于风险管理考虑，仓位规模相对较小适中（毕竟它仍是 25 亿市值的小盘股）。我依然更看好 $LITE，但鉴于其本月已上涨 46%，很难进行补仓。
英文原文
I was actually looking into $AMZN Trainium benchmarks from a semianalysis post and at Amazon's supply chain. And some friends like @yianisz post about it earlier, so I decided to look deeper at it. But it has ~$4B spend from $AMZN as a backstop as they ramp up Trainium/Inferentia clusters, spend from $MSFT ASIC clusters, and we'll likely see more hyperscaler clients as the industry moves to 800g ramp. Mag7 dependency is incredibly rare coming from a $2.5B marketcap company lol. Downside + positive: Is vertically integrated (higher-margins), since it's lasers are builtin Texas. I see just incredible volume demand, moving forward but: the whole name of the game is execution since they actually have to build out the 800G/1.6T transceivers without messing up. I'm fully invested already in $AAOI already with relatively small-moderate position sizing for risk management (it's still a small cap with $2.5B MC). I still like $LITE a lot more, but a bit hard to cost average up on that when it's up 46% this month.
-
作者认为因拥有直接大客户及更低估值，$AAOI 优于 $POET。
我研究过 $POET，但相比 $AAOI 我更喜欢后者，因为 AAOI 已经拥有 $MSFT 和 $AMZN 等直接超大规模客户(hyperscaler customers)。$POET 旗下的 Celestial 已被 $MRVL 收购，Celestial 使用 Poet 的中介层(interposer)来连接 TPU/Trainium，而 Marvell 将其出售给超大规模客户。但这并不等同于通过直接来自 $AMZN 和 $MSFT 的大批量订单以及类似 Amazon 与 $ALAB 的股权投资协议来实现的“几步之遥”的去风险(de-risking)。Amazon 在 $AAOI 中拥有类似 $ALAB 的财务激励，但 Astera 已经是家市值 300 亿美元的公司，而 AAOI 的市值仅为 25 亿美元。
英文原文
I've looked into $POET but didn't like it as much compared to $AAOI given AAOI already has direct hyperscaler customers with $MSFT and $AMZN. $POET had Celestial that got acquired $MRVL, where Celestial used poet’s interposer to connect tpus/trainium, and Marvell sells that to hyperscalers. But it's not quite the same de-risking few hops away as direct massive volume orders from $AMZN and $MSFT and equity agreements that Amazon has like they did with $ALAB. Amazon has a financial incentive in $AAOI like $ALAB, but Astera is already a $30B company, while AAOI is a $2.5B MC.
-
看好$AAOI，因其在AI光互联中的核心地位及美国本土制造优势，认为其被严重低估。
我买入 $ALAB、$NBIS、$TSM 和 $LITE，是因为“七巨头”(Mag7) 的收入正流向这些公司。 $LITE 的独特之处在于其在 GOOGL TPU v7、AMZN Trainium v3/4 和 NVDA Blackwell 中的角色。 但我发现了一个新标的。 一家市值低于 30 亿美元的小盘股，符合我的投资逻辑： 名称 - $AAOI 一家小型光子学玩家，也是我持仓的两家光子学公司之一： 1. Lumentum ($LITE) 在每一款芯片的部署/爬坡中都占据独特地位，因为其光电路交换(Optical Circuit Switching) 技术被用于 Blackwell、Trainium 和 Ironwood，作为一种“横向扩展”(scale-across) 型技术。 无论超大规模云厂商选择 ASIC 还是 GPU，$LITE 都能胜出，因为它处于核心位置。 2. Applied Optoelectronics ($AAOI) 更多涉及“纵向扩展”(scale-out) 连接，针对 Trainium、Maia 等定制 ASIC 集群，通过 400G 和 800G 光缆及光收发器实现。 鉴于 $AAOI 在 AWS（Trainium 的大客户）和 MSFT Maia ASIC 中的角色，它也能无论何种情况都胜出。 行业正经历由向 800G 速度迁移驱动的“超级周期”，而 AAOI 正处于中心位置。 此外，AAOI 具有独特的地缘政治角度： 美国优先。 与许多无晶圆厂(fabless)并将生产外包到台湾的公司不同，Applied Optoelectronics 在德克萨斯州自行制造激光器。 美国超大规模云厂商（特别是 Amazon 和 Microsoft）正在积极减少对关键基础设施中国供应链的依赖，这有助于 AAOI 实现本土激光器制造。 我们还看到一家“主要超大规模云厂商”对其 800G 数据中心光收发器下达了另一笔巨额订单。 但 AAOI 的交易表现像一家困境公司；然而，其亚马逊权证协议隐含的收入为 2025 年 Q4 和 2026 财年的 800G 爬坡创造了非对称的风险/回报特征。鉴于其在 AI 建设中的角色及现有的超大规模云厂商合同，AAOI 似乎结构性被低估。 市场终于开始重估 $LITE，但感觉 $AAOI 才刚刚开始，鉴于其小市值以及作为超大规模云厂商 ASIC 集群关键玩家和“美国制造”的独特角度。 市场目前正在对光子学玩家进行大幅重估并赋予高溢价，但 AAOI 今年仅上涨 2.20%，似乎蓄势待发。
英文原文
I entered $ALAB, $NBIS, $TSM, and $LITE because of Mag7 funneling revenue numbers into them. Lite uniquely because of its role in GOOGL TPU v7, AMZN Trainium v3/4, and NVDA Blackwell. But there's a new one I found out about. A small cap <$3B player that fits the thesis: Name - $AAOI A small cap photonics player, and one of the two photonics players I'm invested in: 1. Lumentum is uniquely positioned in every single supply chip deployment/ramp, as the Optical Circuit Switching technology is used in Blackwell, Trainium, and Ironwood as a "scale-across" type technology. $LITE wins no matter what. Hyperscaler ASIC vs. GPU as it's in the center of it all. 2. Applied Optoelectronics is more of the "scale-out" connectivity, for custom ASIC clusters like Trainium, Maia through 400G and 800G optical cables and transceivers. $AAOI wins no matter what as well given its role with AWS as a whale client for Trainium, and with MSFT Maia ASICs. The industry is going through a "supercycle" driven by the migration to 800G speeds and AAOI is in the center of it. On top of that, AAOI plays unique geopolitical angle, America first. Unlike many other companies that are fabless and export production elsewhere to Taiwan, Applied Optoelectronics makes their own lasers in Texas. US hyperscalers (specifically Amazon and Microsoft) are aggressively reducing reliance on Chinese supply chains for critical infrastructure and that helps AAOI’s ability to manufacture lasers at home. And we've seen another huge volume order from a "major hyperscaler" on its 800G data center transceivers. But AAOI trades like a distressed company; however, the implied revenue of its Amazon warrant agreement creates an asymmetric risk/reward profile on its 800G ramp in Q4 2025 and FY2026. AAOI seems structurally undervalued, given its role in the AI buildout and existing hyperscaler contracts. The markets are finally catching up to LITE, but it feels $AAOI is yet to begin, given its small market cap size but unique angle of a critical player to hyperscaler ASIC clusters and Made in America. The market is currently re-rating heavily with photonics players and assigning a heavy premium, yet AAOI is only up 2.20% this year and seems like it's just about to begin.
-
Neocloud龙头承压，但获超大规模云商背书的个股是理想买点。
我预计Neocloud股票今天会表现不佳，因为$ORCL/$CRWV是“板块龙头”。 但这将是该板块个股的理想买入机会： 因为市场忽略了$ORCL/$CRWV高负债扩张的主要交易对手是OpenAI这一细微差别。 但该板块的其他公司如$NBIS、$CIFR、$WULF则由AAA评级的超大规模云服务商（$META/$META/$GOOGL/$AMZN）的现金牛业务提供背书。
英文原文
I expect a bad day for Neocloud stocks just because $ORCL / $CRWV are "sector leaders". But this would be an ideal buying opportunity for individual companies in the sector: Due to the market missing the nuance that $ORCL / $CRWV's debt-filled buildout is for OpenAI as the main counterparty. But other companies in the sector like $NBIS, $CIFR, $WULF are backstopped by AAA-rated Hyperscaler ( $META / $META / $GOOGL / $AMZN) cash cows.
-
因OpenAI资金风险回避ORCL，看好其他新云厂商回调机会
我一直将 $ORCL 列为回避名单，这次财报导致其下跌11%正是原因所在。 我需要更多时间深入研究，但令人担忧的不仅仅是资本支出(capex)，很大一部分是因为这些支出是为 OpenAI 服务的（而 OpenAI 没有足够的资金来覆盖积压订单）。 其他新云厂商(neoclouds)如 $NBIS 没有这个问题，因为它们的积压订单来自确实有钱的 $MSFT。超大规模云厂商(hyperscaler)的资本支出漏斗才是新云厂商核心逻辑的核心，而不是像甲骨文那样依赖/受制于 OpenAI。 因此，其他新云厂商随之抛售带来的下跌提供了一个良好的机会。
英文原文
I’ve been putting $ORCL on avoid and this earnings was the reason why on the 11% drop. I need more time to look into it but it’s not just capex spend that’s worrying, a large part of it is because of OpenAi (which doesn’t have the funding for the backlog) that a lot of the spend is for. Other neoclouds like $NBIS don’t have this problem because their backlog is from $MSFT that actually have the money. And hyperscaler capex funnel was the core Neocloud thesis, not levered/contingency on OpenAi which oracle faces. So selloff on other Neoclouds that got brought down with it presents a good opportunity
-
分析NBIS受ATM及空头压制，但基本面强劲且机构增持，高波动需耐心持有。
就我个人对 $NBIS 的观察来看，其表现主要受定向增发(ATM)抛压、板块拖累、短期空头以及19日到期的巨额未平仓合约影响。例如，$CRWV 昨日上涨5.13%，而 $NBIS 同日下跌3.91%，我认为这归因于空头或ATM操作。有些令人遗憾，尽管 $NBIS 是降息的最大受益者（新云(neocloud)板块），但今天下跌2%，而其他散户宠儿如 $RKLB 却上涨8%+。价格走势有时会让你自我怀疑，但即使有10%的稀释，也改变不了你提到的事实：Nebius 2026年底年化经常性收入(ARR)中值为80亿美元，与Avride推出了Robotaxis，与 $META 达成30亿美元交易，Clickhouse增长极快，另外两家子公司同比增长100%，其中Toloka受益于 $META 的Scale收购。机构持股比例目前可能接近52%（上月彭博终端显示50%多，MSCI调整前），较上季度的30%多高，机构确实在从投降的散户手中收购股份。此时持有很痛苦，但请记住作为市场上最高贝塔(beta)股票之一，它在一周内可能波动35%。（在2-3周内从100美元到140美元到95美元再到130美元）。
英文原文
So from what I've seen personally with $NBIS, it's largely ATM overhang + sector drag + short term shorts, and large amounts of open interest expiring on the 19th. For example, $CRWV was up 5.13% yesterday, while $NBIS was down 3.91% same day, and I'd attribute that to either shorts/ATMs. It's a little unfortunate, even as the largest beneficiary of rate cuts (neocloud sector), $NBIS is down 2% today while other retail favorites like $RKLB are up 8%+. Price action makes you doubt yourself sometimes, but even with 10% dilution, it doesn't really change the fact as you mentioned Nebius has $8B midpoint ARR EOY 2026, they launched Robotaxis with Avride, $META $3B deal, Clickhouse is growing incredibly fast, and their other two subsidaries are growing 100% Y/Y with Toloka benefiting from $META Scale acquisition. Institutional ownership is now probably closer to 52%(bloomberg terminal 50's last month pre msci) from high 30's last quarter and institutions are definitely acquiring shares from retail capitulating. Painful hold at this point, but keep in mind it can move 35% on a random week as one of the highest beta stocks in the market. (went from $100 to $140 to $95 to $130 in the span of 2-3 weeks).
-
美联储降息后发布12月11日个股评级，重点推荐AI基建、稳定币及超跌成长股。
美联储降息25个基点后。 12月11日评级： 强烈买入： $CRCL $COIN $AMKR $CRDO $IBIT $MSTR $AMZN $SMCI $TSM $TSSI SK海力士 $SNAP 三星电子 $ALAB $META $NBIS $CIFR 买入： $KRUS $AVGO $NFLX $KRKNF $HIMS $FLY $OSS $TE $FLNC $LITE $COHR $RKLB $TTD $NVDA $CLS $GOOGL $RDDT $WULF $CRWV $IREN $GLXY $WLAC $MPWR 回避 $RGTI $PLTR $WMT $ETH $BMNR $TSLA $IONQ $ORCL $SLNH $OKLO 解释： 今天美联储如期降息25个基点。这通常会引导流动性进入成长股，并利好那些债务使用最多（以更低利率再融资）的中小盘股，例如像$NBIS和$CIFR这样的新云(Neoclouds)。 然而，这也恰逢日本加息，可能导致去年重新加载的套息交易(Carry Trade)平仓；但这是短期的，基本面>短期波动。 强烈买入评级： Circle - 大幅下跌主要由于IPO后的股份解禁。然而，降息损害了其商业模式~利息收入减少20%。 话虽如此，我们看到稳定币市场大幅增长，我个人看到大量早期风险投资（a16z, Sequoia等）涌入与稳定币相关的公司，如新银行(Neobanks)。我们应该看到所有这些都流入更多的USDC铸造，铸造量将抵消降息的影响。 Coinbase - 与Circle相同，他们在USDC方面有50%的收入分成。然而，他们还有自己的交易所，而且降息通常有助于风险资产如加密货币（尤其是比特币跌破9万美元后）。 Amkor - 受益于半导体/晶圆厂向美国制造的转移。 Credo - 过去5天下跌-16%，今天下跌8%。很好的恢复性买入，不认为数据中心建设的数据连接需求会下降。 ALAB - 与CRDO相同的论点 IBIT (比特币) - 始终是长线好标的，尤其是在$93K时 Microstrategy (MSTR) - 受益于比特币复苏，并分析了他们是否会爆仓。TLDR：不会，在需要支付利息之前（约2029年），我们还有另一次比特币减半事件。 Amazon - 今年一动不动。基本面改善，年底有助于电商部门。定制芯片、星座、Robotaxi，他们基本上什么都做，而市场尚未真正奖励他们的努力。只是感觉我们可能会在接下来的2个月看到它跑赢大盘。 SMCI - 之前发过关于这个的论点帖，惊人的恢复性买入。它因将收入积压转移到下一季度而在财报后下跌，但市场没有定价他们未来收入同比增长60%但交易在~11倍远期市盈率的事实。 TSM - 整个AI/半导体建设的骨干。我们看到关于TPU与GPU的争论，但TSM不在乎。 TSSI - 与SMCI相同的论点，依附于Dell，作为一个代理，我们看到来自IREN等供应商和其他在2026年建设数据中心的新云的巨大积压，我们应该看到这在明年实现。 SK海力士 - 显然有关于在美国市场上市升级的传闻，这应该提振流动性。此外，内存市场因AI建设而需求极高。 Snapchat - 只是被低估。$13B市值，~1B+季度收入。NA DAU较上季度下降3%，但不要为了成为下一个FB而买入。他们只需要削减GCP成本并货币化记忆功能（他们已经做了），我们应该看到明年重新评级100%+，特别是随着Perplixty交易带来的$400m+额外收入/股权。 三星电子 - 人们认为这也是内存，因为它构成了他们利润的很大一部分，但我将其视为潜在的下一个现金牛晶圆厂玩法，如TSM，作为第二大玩家吸收任何最大产能溢出。 META - 一次性税收抛售，超卖。现在我们终于看到他们创建前沿模型（Avacado，如果我记得没错的话）。所以他们可以货币化他们一直在花钱的llama开源llm努力。他们还削减了元宇宙努力，这应该是对盈利能力的巨大推动。 Nebius - 由于2500万股稀释导致短期拖累。ATM可能正在提供。话虽如此，一旦完成，由于来自其DC业务（7-9B ARR）及其4家市场未定价的子公司（同比增长100%+）的远期收入/增长，极度低估。 CIFR - 由于比特币价格（资产负债表上持有大量）导致短期下跌，但由于他们做托管(Colo)模式，不受GPU贬值争论的太大影响。此外由Google背书，并与Amazon有合同，因此从根本上降低了风险，是新云领域的顶级买入之一。 买入评级： 文字空间不够，所以给出更短的TLDR Kura Sushi - 波段交易，拉出5年图表，你会明白我的意思，每次它触底（大约现在）。这从未失败过！ Broadcom - 超大规模建设，与联发科一起对TPU至关重要 Netflix - 16%的下跌对于收购来说感觉有点不必要 KRKNF - 基本面增长良好，作为Andruil供应商的市场具有防御性。 HIMS - 股票回购计划，通常低于$40是很好的买入/波段交易。Zava收购未被定价，且仍在增长。 FLY - SpaceX $1.5T估值应该提振整个太空板块。这是2026年中型发射的玩法。 OSS - 之前对此进行过DD，潜在的Andruil供应商。否则，在这个市值下无论如何都有些低估。 TE - 少数Murican能源基础设施之一，太阳能。它可能比核能更商业化。 FLNC - 与AI建设+能源相同的论点 LITE - 现在相当过度延伸，不会追高。但长期受益于处于tpu ironwood + blackwell建设的中间。 COHR - 与Lite相同，但似乎是次要玩家。 RKLB - 可能是我最喜欢的长线。现在相当高估，但由于SpaceX的FOMO无法避免。 TTD - 之前的论点帖，仅基于远期收入数字，似乎是一个很好的恢复性玩法。 NVDA - TPU恐惧有点夸大，看看积压订单。 CLS - TPU v7生态系统买入 GOOGL - 他们像NVDA一样销售TPU，像Waymo一样增长Robotaxi市场，Gemini成功。全方位开火。 Reddit - 就像早期的Robinhood一样，只是一台印钞机。对RDDT通过FCF增长收购做了一些论点评论。否则，他们将留下来并受益于所有世代使用它（不像Snap那样早期） WULF - 类似于CIFR。重新评级可能会发生，取决于更多关于Anthropic建设的信息。 CRWV - 糟糕，糟糕的长线。良好的短期恢复性买入。 IREN - 如果他们继续购买GPU来做AI云，我不会把钱投进去，只是因为稀释。但他们可能会做托管，并且拥有大量的GW容量，所以仍然很有希望。 GLXY - 数据中心建设的受益者。 WLAC - 可能他们本月进行SPAC IPO。他们说Q4。 MPWR - TPU v7生态系统买入 回避 RGTI - 量子，没有基本面/收入支持 PLTR - 449.01B市值lol WMT - 他们每年增长4%的收入，但交易在40倍市盈率，这很疯狂。 ETH - 以太坊伟大的网络。然而，没有代币销毁，也没有收入流向代币持有者。糟糕的投资，伟大的开发者工具/生态系统。 BMNR - 以太坊代理。 TSLA - 有点脱离基本面。但这是对elon musk、大规模Robotaxi、机器人的赌注。我个人只是认为这过度承诺，但我们会看到。 IONQ - 量子，没有基本面/收入支持 ORCL - 大部分远期积压依赖于openai，如果openai在市场份额上输给claude/gemini，这使得事情极其不确定/有风险。话虽如此，现在是一个很好的恢复性买入，但长期来看有风险。 SLNH - 如果你想被他们的2.8gw管道稀释到虚无，这是要持有的股票。 OKLO - 没有像量子那样的基本面来支持目前的市值，这可能需要多年才能实现。
英文原文
Post-Fed Interest Rate 25BPS cut. December 11th ratings: Strong Buy: $CRCL $COIN $AMKR $CRDO $IBIT $MSTR $AMZN $SMCI $TSM $TSSI Sk Hynix $SNAP Samsung Electronics $ALAB $META $NBIS $CIFR Buy: $KRUS $AVGO $NFLX $KRKNF $HIMS $FLY $OSS $TE $FLNC $LITE $COHR $RKLB $TTD $NVDA $CLS $GOOGL $RDDT $WULF $CRWV $IREN $GLXY $WLAC $MPWR Avoid $RGTI $PLTR $WMT $ETH $BMNR $TSLA $IONQ $ORCL $SLNH $OKLO Explanations: Today fed cut interest rates 25BPS as expected. This usually funnel liquidity into growth stocks and benefits small-medium caps that use debt the most (refinance with lower interest rates), such as Neoclouds like $NBIS and $CIFR. However, this coincides with Japan hiking, which might lead to carry trade unwind from last year's reload; but this is short term, fundamentals > volatility short term. Strong Buy Ratings: Circle - Massive drop mainly due to share unlock post IPO. However, rate cuts hurt their business model ~20% revenue cut from interest. That being said, we're seeing a massive growth in the stablecoin market, and I'm personally seeing huge early venture capital funding (a16z, sequioa, etc). being poured into stablecoin related companies such as Neobanks. We should see all of this funnel into more USDC printing, and the printer outweigh rate cuts. Coinbase - Same as Circle, they have 50% revenue sharing in terms of USDC. However, they also have their exchange on top, and rate cuts generally help riskier assets such as crypto (especially post drop Bitcoin sub 90k) Amkor - Benefits from Made in America shift to semis/fab. Credo - Dropped -16% last 5 days, and 8% today. Great recovery buy, don't see connectivity demand dropping from DC buildout. ALAB - Same thesis as CRDO IBIT (Bitcoin) - Always a great long, especially so at $93K Microstrategy (MSTR) - Benefits from Bitcoin recovery and did an analysis whether they would get liquidated or not. TLDR: no, we have another bitcoin halving event before they need to pay off interest, which was around 2029. Amazon - Hasn't moved an inch all year. Fundamentals improving, EOY helps E-commerce division. Custom chips, constellations, robotaxis, they're basically doing everything and market hasn't really rewarded their effort yet. Just a feeling we might see this outperform next 2 months. SMCI - Did a thesis post on this earlier, amazing recovery buy. It dropped on earnings due to shifting revenue backlog to next quarter, but markets aren't pricing in the fact they're growing 60% Y/Y forward revenue but trading at ~11 forward p/e or so. TSM - Backbone of the whole AI/semi buildout. We're seeing arguments about TPU vs. GPU, but TSM doesn't care. TSSI - Same thesis with SMCI, piggybacks off of Dell, just as a proxy we're seeing massive backlog from vendors such as IREN, and other neoclouds building out DCs 2026, and we should see this come into fruition next year. Sk Hynix - Apparently there's been rumors about uplisting to US markets, which should be a boost to liquidity. Also memory markets is just incredibly high demand from AI buildout. Snapchat - Just undervalued. $13B marketcap, ~1B+ quarterly revenue. NA DAU dropped 3% from last quarter but don't buy this for being the next FB. All they need to do is cut GCP costs and monetize memories (which they did) and we should see this re-rate 100%+ next year, especially with $400m+ in added revenue/equity from the Perplixty deal Samsung Electronics - People think of this as memory as well because it makes up a large part of their profit, but i see this as a potential next cash cow foundry play like TSM, as the 2nd largest player to soak up any max capacity overflow. META - One time tax selloff, was oversold. Now we finally see them create a frontier model (Avacado) if i remember correctly. So they can monetize the llama open source llm efforts they've been just blowing money on. They also cut their metaverse efforts, which should be a huge boost in proftiability. Nebius - Short term drag due to 25m share dilution. ATM is likely being offered. That being said once this finishes, insanely undervalued due to forward revenue/growth from both its DC business (7-9B ARR), and its 4 subsidaries that the markets dont price in (growing 100%+ Y/Y) CIFR - Short term drop due to Bitcoin prices (holding a lot on balance sheet), but not really affected by GPU depreciation arguments since they do colo models. Also backstopped by google, and they have contracts with Amazon, so fundamentally disrisked and one of the top buys in neocloud secotr. Buy Ratings: Running out of text space so will give a shorter TLDR Kura Sushi - Swing trade zoom out 5 year chart and you'll see what I mean every time it bottoms (around now). This never fails! Broadcom - Hyperscaler buildout, critical to TPU alongside Mediatek Netflix - 16% drop feels a bit unwarranted for the acquisition KRKNF - Great growing fundamentals and defensible market as an andruil supplier. HIMS - Share buyback program, usually sub $40 great buy/swing trade. Zava acqusition not being priced in and it's still growing. FLY - SpaceX $1.5T valuation should boost up the whole space sector. This was a 2026 play for medium lift. OSS - DD on this earlier potential andruil supplier. Otherwise, kind of undervalued at this MC anyway. TE - One of the few Murican energy infra, Solar. It's likely more commercial than Nuclear. FLNC - Same thesis with AI buildout + energy LITE - Pretty overextended right now, wouldn't chase. But long term benefits from being in the middle of both tpu ironwood + blackwell buildout COHR - Same with Lite, but seems like a secondary player. RKLB - Probably my favorite long. Pretty overvalued right now but can't help it due to SpaceX fomo. TTD - Thesis post earlier, just based on forward revenue numbers, it seems like a great recovery play. NVDA - TPU fears are a bit overblown, just look at backlog. CLS - TPU v7 ecosystem buy GOOGL - They sell TPUs like NVDA, growing robotoaxis market like waymo, gemini succesful. Just firing on all fronts. Reddit - Just a money printer like early day Robinhood. Made some thesis comments about RDDT growing in terms of acquisitions from FCF. Otherwise, they're here to stay and benefits from all gens using it (unlike snap which is earlier) WULF - Similar to CIFR. Rerating might happen depending on more info about the Anthropic buildout. CRWV - Terrible, terrible long. Good short term recovery buy. IREN - I would not put money into this if they kept buying GPUs to do AI cloud just due to dilution. but they might do colo and they have an immense amount of GW capacity so it's still promising. GLXY - Beneficary of DC Buildout. WLAC - Possible that they're SPAC ipoing this month. They did say Q4. MPWR - TPU v7 ecosystem buy Avoid RGTI - Quantum, no fundamentals/revenue to back it up PLTR - 449.01B market cap lol WMT - They're growing like 4% revenue a year, but trading at 40 p/e which is insane. ETH - Ethereum great network. However, there's no token burn and none of the revenue goes to token holders. Terrible investment, great developer tooling/ecosystem. BMNR - Ethereum proxy. TSLA - Kind of detached from fundamentals. But it's a bet on elon musk, robotaxis at scale, robotics. I personally just see this as overpromising, but we'll see. IONQ -Quantum, no fundamentals/revenue to back it up ORCL - Most of forward backlog is dependent on openai, which makes things incredibly uncertain/risky if openai falls to claude/gemini in market share. That being said, it's a good recovery buy right now, but long term it's risky. SLNH - This is the stock to be in if you want diluted to oblivion on their 2.8gw pipeline. OKLO - no fundamentals like quantum to back up mc at this moment, this likely years out to come into fruition.
-
批评$NBIS大规模ATM增发导致股价承压，对比$CRWV表现。
$NBIS 有一个2500万股的自动取款机(ATM)增发，很可能正在公开市场上出售。 $CRWV 今天上涨了5.13%+，而 $NBIS 收盘下跌3.91%。这就是为什么我非常讨厌这种规模的ATM增发。 这基本上就是在等待公司完成ATM增发，或者在其他做空者活动的背景下暂停它。
英文原文
$NBIS has a 25 million share ATM that's likely being sold on the open market. $CRWV went up 5.13%+ today while $NBIS ended the day down 3.91%. That's why I really dislike ATMs at this size. It's just basically waiting for the company to finish the ATM offering or pause it amid other short seller activity.
-
大幅加仓TSM并适度买入CRCL，看好其突破机会及USDC业务前景。
今天大幅加仓了 $TSM，价格约 $302.5。 同时也适度加仓了 $CRCL，价格约 $87.2。 自 $TSM 创下纪录般的业绩以来，股价一直在震荡整理，直觉告诉我它随时可能突破。这纯粹是凭感觉。 至于 $CRCL，虽然降息对其不利，但美元稳定币 (USDC) 的铸造仍在持续。加密货币也从12月的降息中反弹，且股份解禁已完成。 因此我认为 $190亿市值是一个很好的机会。自首次公开募股 (IPO) 以来我就想做多 Circle，但直到最近才等到机会。
英文原文
Added very heavily in $TSM today ~$302.5. Also added a decent amount in $CRCL positions at ~$87.2. We’ve been chopping since record breaking earnings from $TSM just felt it would breakout anytime now. This is just gut feeling. As for $CRCL rate cuts hurt, but the USDC printer keeps on going. Crypto also rebounding from Dec rate cut, and share unlock is done. So felt $19B MC was a good opportunity. I wanted to go long on Circle ever since IPO but never got the opportunity to until recently.
-
确认$NBIS期权合约作为示例
@blu400_ 是的，$NBIS 12/19 $130C 就是一个例子
英文原文
@blu400_ I do, $NBIS 12/19 $130C was one example