个股论点
围绕单一股票的投资逻辑与仓位表态 · 共 2504 条 · 滚到底自动加载更多
-
认为买 Sumitomo 比买 AXT 更像是在降低弹性；AVGO 的光学故事也不如 ASIC 逻辑直接。
这就像买住友而不是 $AXTI。 你买的是一个大巨头，但对这个行业增长的直接暴露更低。一个可能年初至今涨 15%，另一个可能涨 300%。 把 $AVGO 当成光学相关故事去买，而它很大一部分增长其实来自 ASIC，也不是个好主意。不过作为长期多头，它本身还是很不错的。
英文原文
Same as going long on Sumitomo instead of $AXTI. You're buying a big giant for lower direct exposure to the sector growth. Once might be up 15% YTD, the other might be up 300%. Buying $AVGO for optical related stuff when a large portion of their growth comes from ASICs is not a great idea. But as a long itself, it's solid.
-
认为 AAOI 短期会受 2.5 亿美元 ATM 压制，100 美元附近或有阻力，但长期不重要。
短期看，$AAOI 正在以 100 美元的价格做 2.5 亿美元稀释，所以在一段时间内可能不会明显高于这个价位。 因为他们就是在这个价格卖给公开市场。上一个 ATM 他们很快就吸收完了。 中长期其实没那么重要。 如果我切换成日内交易员的眼镜来看，要是它再跌一次到 80 美元区间，我个人会很乐意买。
英文原文
Short term, $AAOI is diluting $250m at $100 so probably won’t go too high above that number for awhile. Cause they’re selling it but the open market at that price. They tapped into their last ATM ASAP. Mid-Long term doesn’t really matter. If I put on my day trading glasses, if it drops one more time to the $80s, strong yes imo.
-
用 AI 供应链映射的梗调侃 Meta 的业绩波动
你说得对，算法确实从 AI 供应链映射里学到了一些东西。 肥料暴涨 -> $META 牛油果 -> 抛售。
英文原文
@Shabach17 You’re right, algorithms have been taking some lessons from AI supply chain mapping. fertilizer spike -> $META avocados -> selloff.
-
认为 Meta 的增长指引说明投入开始见效
他们给出的指引是同比增长约 33.5%（535 亿到 565 亿美元），而这还是一家市值 1.5 万亿美元以上的公司。 看起来扎克在 $META 上砸的钱，似乎确实开始起作用了。
英文原文
@mktoperative They guided ~33.5% y/y growth ($53.5B- $56.5B) as a $1.5T+ company. Think whatever Zuck is spending on with $META seems to be working.
-
认为 Meta 这波回撤有点过头
你们觉得市场不知道 $META 的收入全来自卖广告吗？ 又不是种牛油果？ 过去一个月总共跌了 16.92%，其中这次又跌了 4%，我觉得有点过头了。
英文原文
Do you think markets know $META makes all their revenue from selling ads? Not farming avocados? -4% selloff for a total of -16.92% this past month is a bit too much. https://t.co/wMkcrMaIhX
-
提示 AAOI 在 100 美元附近会有 ATM 压力
@scarfo_leo $AAOI 有一个 5 亿美元的 ATM，行权/发行价在 100 美元附近，那个价位大概会有 2.5 亿美元的卖压，持续不了太久。
英文原文
@scarfo_leo $AAOI has a $500m ATM at $100, probably going to be $250m selling pressure at that level for a tiny bit
-
称赞 Soitec 是下一只衬底概念股
@realstockfox 我之前喊过 Soitec 会成为下一个衬底主题股，现在 $SOI 已经涨了 44%+。
英文原文
@realstockfox I did shoutout Soitech as the next upcoming substrate play and $SOI is now up 44%+ https://t.co/qsuIf3cjNd
-
把 TSEM 当稳健复合器，把 AXTI 当高弹性标的
有 $TSEM 这种更稳的光子复合器。 然后还有我那匹打了类固醇、装了火箭发动机的赛马：$AXTI。 我的仓位已经涨了 550%+。 而 AXT 今天又涨了 10.38%。 $NVDA 的回报都被甩在后面了；几个月前把 AXT 识别为 InP 瓶颈，很多人因此实现了代际财富。
英文原文
There’s $TSEM, my safer photonics compounder. Then there’s my race horse on steroids, with a rocket ship attached: $AXTI. My positions are up over 550%+. And AXT is up another 10.38% today. $NVDA returns got left in the dust, as identifying AXT as the InP bottleneck few months ago was generational wealth to many.
-
继续看好 Tower Semiconductor 作为稳健光子复合股
$TSEM 根本不在乎市场其他部分。 Tower Semi 是我最喜欢的光子标的之一，像更稳健版的 $TSM 式复合器。 这是 AI 新范式的一部分。 今天又涨了 5.8%。
英文原文
$TSEM does not concern itself with the rest of the market. Tower semi is one of my favorite photonic names, as a safer $TSM like compounder. For the new paradigm of AI. Up 5.8% today. https://t.co/UcH1K6C4UI
-
认为 Reddit 的内幕卖出不构成噪音
@NegativeConvex 不，$RDDT 的内幕减持不算什么噪音。
英文原文
@NegativeConvex No, insider sales are noise for $RDDT. https://t.co/4szrTTanbF
-
给 PayPay 研究者的简短结论：估值不便宜
谢谢，想顺手替大家节省一点研究 $PAYP 的时间；之所以感兴趣，是因为我在日本也听过这个名字。 也许有一天它会在日本变得像 $HOOD 一样，但按现在的指标看，估值已经相当高了。所以我自己最后选择了放弃，不过希望这能给其他研究它的人提供一个不错的 TL;DR / 起点。
英文原文
Thanks, thought I'd save others some time with $PAYP, got interested since I've heard of the name before in Japan. Maybe it ends up like $HOOD one day in Japan, but already pretty richly valued from metrics. So I personally ended up passing, but hope it's a good TLDR/starting point for others researching.
-
拆解 PayPay IPO 的基本面与估值
PayPay（$PAYP）是最新上市的公司。 如果你在想，要不要冲一下这家日本的“$PYPL / WeChat”公司，市值 118 亿美元？ 那我们来看看。 如果你去过日本，你就会知道 PayPay 到处都是。 它是日本版超级 App，涵盖支付、投资和银行业务。 下面拆一下： 2025 财年指标： 收入：2991 亿日元（约 19 亿美元） 增速：约 26.3% 净利润（GAAP）：392 亿日元（约 2.48 亿美元） 市盈率：约 44 倍 股权薪酬：几乎为 0，不像美国的 $SNAP 和 $DUOL。 看资产负债表： 合并会计让 $PAYP 的账目非常难读。 4.85 万亿日元（约 323 亿美元）的负债或客户存款被混在资产里。 但上市前净负债大约是 -4.8 亿美元，上市募资后约 4.96 亿美元。 所以资产负债表大致是净现金略偏正，但整体中性。 另外提醒一下：软银是大股东，锁定期到 2026 年 9 月才到期。 按 118 亿美元估值，它大约是 5.8 倍 PS，对一家以 26% 增速、利润率还在扩张、且几乎没有 SBC 的日本超级 App 来说，这算是正常估值，不算特别便宜，也不算离谱。 TL;DR：总体上看，$PAYP 按 118 亿美元估值并不差。 后面可能会有 IPO 热度，再叠加低流通盘效应；但如果股价再涨很多，我不会追。 也许它会像 $HOOD 一样，靠 TAM 扩张慢慢抬估值。 不过几个月后软银那类类似 ATM 的压制也会出现。 但眼下还有更便宜的错价机会，比如 $RDDT。
英文原文
PayPay ( $PAYP ) is the newest IPO. If you're wondering if you should fomo in the $PYPL / WeChat of Japan at an $11.8B MC? Let's find out. If you've ever been to Japan: PayPay is everywhere. It's the Japanese SuperApp for payments, investing, and banking. Here's a breakdown: FY 2025 metrics: Revenue: ¥299.1 billion (~$1.9 billion) Growth Rate: ~26.3% Net Income (GAAP): ¥39.2 billion (~$248 million) P/E: ~44x Stock Base Compensation: Virtually 0, unlike $SNAP and $DUOL in the US. If we look at balance sheet: Consolidated accounting makes things a nightmare when you see $PAYP ¥4.85 Trillion (~$32.3 Billion) in liabilities or customer deposits mixed into assets. But pre-IPO net debt is approximately -$480M, and post-IPO proceeds of ~$496M. So balance sheet looks roughly net cash slightly positive but neutral. Also PSA: Softbank is the majority owner, lockup expires September 2026. At $11B, it's roughly ~5.8x P/S and very profitable for a Japanese superapp growing at 26% with expanding margins and zero SBC. By US standards, this is normally valued, not exactly a screaming buy. TLDR: In general, $PAYP is not a terrible long at $11.8B. Might get some IPO hype + mixed with low float dynamics, but would not chase if it ends up a lot higher. Maybe there's some TAM expansion like $HOOD that prices it up over time. But Softbank ATM-like overhang in a few months. But there's a lot better mispriced choices out there like $RDDT right now.
-
强调自己不受研究机构立场约束
和其他在研究机构或基金工作的人相比，我是独立的。 所以我可以直说：有人花几百万去把 $PLTR 这种国防承包商，和给小企业写博客的辅助工具硬做比较，我当然有资格吐槽。 更妙的是，跟着他的人也在市场里继续亏更多钱。
英文原文
I’m independent compared to others who work at research firms or funds. So I’m allowed to speak my mind about someone who charges millions to compare $PLTR, a defense contractor, with small business blogging helpers. Best of all, the following him are also losing more money on top in the market.
-
讽刺 Burry 订阅费和 PLTR/ADBE 的比较
我是真挺震惊的： 人们居然每年合计给 Michael Burry 付 1000 万美元以上的订阅费， 就为了在 $PLTR 和 $ADBE 上一起亏钱。 这还不算他们自己每年 400 多美元的订阅费。 当初他们把 HubSpot 这种小企业博客工具的估值，拿去和 Palantir 那套用于入侵伊朗和委内瑞拉的黑箱 AI 程序做比较时，就已经露出苗头了。 当他们觉得有必要在 X 上把任何人都拉黑，因为自己的论点经不起公开辩论时…… 也许你跟错人了？
英文原文
I’m genuinely impressed: People are collectively paying Michael Burry $10 million + in yearly subscription fees. Just to lose money on both $PLTR and $ADBE. On top of their $400+ yearly sub fee. There were signs when they tried comparing Hubspot small business blogging valuations. To Palantir’s black box AI programs used to invade Iran and Venezuela. When they feel the need to block anyone on X because their arguments can’t hold up to public debate… Maybe you’re following the wrong person?
-
提醒别在 AXT 底部投降
@Gubloinvestor 下次别在 $AXTI 见底的时候就直接投降了。
英文原文
@Gubloinvestor maybe don't capitulate at the bottom with $AXTI next time
-
认为 LWLG 太投机，更偏好 Soitec
@demarscrypto 对我来说，$LWLG 太投机了，哪怕还有 $TSEM 的整合因素。 和 Soitec 这类名字相比，我发现后者的风险回报更好一些，而它们的市值区间也差不多（约 7 亿到 20 亿美元）。
英文原文
@demarscrypto $LWLG too speculative for me given MC, even with $TSEM integration. Found better risk reward to be with names like Soitec, which share similar MCs range ($700m-$2B range).
-
回顾别人当年也拿 CEO 卖股说 AXT 不行
@FossilWhisperer 这些评论当年 $AXTI 还在 12 美元时我就听过。 “CEO 卖个不停，这说明他对业务没信心。” “现在盘前已经跌了 20%，经典走势。” 结果时间一拉长，股价直接翻了四倍。
英文原文
@FossilWhisperer These were the same comments back when $AXTI was $12 by the way. "the CEO can't stop selling, this is signaling lack of faith in the business" "it’s down 20% pre-market right now. classic." Fast forward, it's quadrupled in price. https://t.co/O1yZtR9etO
-
短期会有更好的买点，但长期都看涨
@Jacktecau990 短期里总会有更好的买点，比如 $SOI、$AAOI 或 $AXTI。 但从长期看，我预计它们都会上涨，因为光子会成为 AI 的新架构范式。
英文原文
@Jacktecau990 There's always going to be better buying short term opportunities like with $SOI, $AAOI, or $AXTI. But long term I expect them all to go up as photonics becomes the new architectural paradigm for AI.
-
用 NOL 税盾解释 Reddit 看起来被低估
$RDDT 过去大部分时间都处于亏损状态，并积累了： ~65 亿美元的美国联邦净经营亏损结转（NOL）。 ~44 亿美元的美国州级 NOL。 ~49 亿美元的英国 NOL。 ~10 亿美元的美国联邦研发税收抵免。 如果你按 Reddit 2025 年不考虑 NOL 的净利润来算，大概会是 4.19 亿美元。 但加上亏损结转后，它会被人为抬到大约 5.3 亿美元。 我之前一直在说，即便盈利因为这些 NOL 库存而被人为放大（而且 Reddit 到目前为止只用了那 65 亿美元中的一小部分），它依然非常便宜，因为它的 GAAP 盈利能力实在太强了。
英文原文
So $RDDT operated at a loss for most of time, and carried: ~$6.5 billion in U.S. federal NOL carryforwards. ~$4.4 billion in U.S. state NOL carryforwards. ~$4.9 billion in U.K. NOL carryforwards. ~$1.0 billion in U.S. federal research tax credits. If you're looking at Reddit 2025 net income without NOLs, it would be roughly: $419M. But with loss carry forwards, it gets artificially inflated to ~$530m. I was saying even if earnings were artificially inflated from NOL stockpiles (and Reddit only used a fraction of that $6.5B so far) -> it's still extremely undervalued given how gaap profitable they are
-
猜测 AAOI 可能又在 100 美元附近卖 2.5 亿
这种事总会发生。我的猜测是，他们大概又会在 100 美元附近卖出 2.5 亿美元的股份，跟之前那次 ATM 类似。 短期偏空，但长期大概率还是增厚，除非 $AAOI 像之前那样在超出实际执行所需的情况下反复用 ATM。 我当时就是为这点对 $AAOI 管理层很不满，因为现在不确定性又多了；他们本来从一开始就应该把需要多少钱说清楚。
英文原文
It happens. My guess is they’re probably selling $250m worth around $100 again like their previous ATM. Short term bearish, long term likely accretive unless $AAOI repeat use ATM beyond what they actually need to execute. That was the overhang I was mad with $AAOI management about, because now there’s more uncertainty given they should have just announced what they needed from the start.
-
仍把 Reddit 当核心多头，只是对成本线以下有点不爽
@RB1Patrick 是的，$RDDT 是我核心多头之一，成本大概在 137 美元附近。 我只是很不爽它跌到我的成本线下面了。
英文原文
@RB1Patrick Yes $RDDT is one of my core longs around $137. I’m just upset it went below my cost average.
-
短期仍偏空 AAOI，但长期看更像被低估
通常长期持股、把它忘掉会更好。因为你永远不知道第二天会不会突然来一个超大客户合作。 不过，短期看这还是偏空的，因为 $AAOI 如果新的 2.5 亿美元 ATM 真成功了，心理压力会很重，甚至有点像 $POET 那样继续稀释。 但如果你是 28 美元买入，那在 100 美元附近每天 -20% 到 +20% 的波动，其实就不太需要在意了。
英文原文
It’s usually better to just hold stocks long term and forget about it. As you never know if there’s going to be a surprise hyperscaler deal the next day. However, this is net bearish near term with a PTSD overhang that $AAOI pulls a $POET and keeps diluting if the new $250m atm is successful. But if you bought at $28, you wouldn’t need to care about to short term -20% to 20% day to day changes happening around $100
-
不该把 Reddit 和高稀释公司混为一谈
@MarkosAAIG 不能把 $RDDT 这种全球最受欢迎的平台之一，和那些 SBC 永无止境的 $SNAP 或 $DUOL 相提并论。 Reddit 去年的 GAAP 净利润是 5.3 亿美元（已经包含 SBC），而 Snapchat 的稀释性要强得多。
英文原文
@MarkosAAIG Would not compare one of the most popular platforms in the world $RDDT to the likes of endless SBC $SNAP or $DUOL. GAAP net income for Reddit last year was $530 million (including SBC), while Snapchat is heavily dilutive.
-
认为 Reddit 可能还会横盘一阵再突然上冲
@jpainefrommaine 对，大致就是这样。 如果 $RDDT 接下来一个月还在 120 到 150 美元之间横着走，我一点都不会惊讶；等大家都投降之后，它又突然冲到 200 美元以上。
英文原文
@jpainefrommaine Yeah basically. I would not be surprised if $RDDT just sat around $120-$150 for another month, then when everyone capitulates it randomly goes to $200+
-
评论$AAOI将ATM规模扩至5亿美元，认为市场已吸收首轮卖压，但对过度ATM融资模式整体看空。
$AAOI提交了额外2.5亿美元的市价股票发行协议(ATM)，将总额提升至5亿美元。积极的信号是：$AAOI已完成其首个ATM。市场吸收了2.5亿美元的卖压（可能在股价涨至120美元前卖出了约1亿美元），但股价仍然上涨。修正案显示，截至2026年3月12日，根据销售协议已出售2,476,307股，获得总收益约2.49999983亿美元。然而，当涉及像$IREN或$POET这样公司的过度ATM时，我持极度看空态度，这并非针对$AAOI。如果5亿美元用于产能扩张，相比其他公司60亿美元的ATM，可能更有增值空间，人们可以等待结果。尽管如此，我对此并不满意，如果他们需要5亿美元，一开始就应该这么做。
英文原文
$AAOI files for another $250 million USD ATM, upping the amount to $500 million. The positive note is: $AAOI has already finished their first ATM. Markets absorbed $250 million in selling pressure (likely ~$100 before the stock went to $120) and the stock increased anyway. “The amendment states that 2,476,307 shares have been sold for gross proceeds of approximately $249,999,983 under the sales agreement as of March 12, 2026” However, I’m extremely bearish when it comes to excessive ATMs for any company like $IREN or $POET, and it’s not inclusive to $AAOI. $500 million for capacity expansion is likely accretive compared to other $6 billion ATMs if people want to wait it out. That being said, not happy about it and if they needed $500 million, should have done it from the start.
-
吐槽把 2.5 亿 ATM 直接抬到 5 亿的时机太差
@MichaelCla20642 把 ATM 从 2.5 亿直接抬到 5 亿美元，这时机实在糟透了。 他们本来应该在那笔 2 亿美元的超大客户订单之后立刻这么做。 不过，第一轮 2.5 亿已经做完这一点倒是偏多。
英文原文
@MichaelCla20642 Absolutely atrocious timing for to raise $250m -> $500M ATM. Should have been straight after the $200m hyperscaler deal. The fact they finished their first $250M ATM is bullish though
-
认为 Reddit 被明显低估
$RDDT 现在已经有点离谱了。 看起来完全被错定价了。过去几个月已经跌了 40%。 如果把结转亏损剔除掉，它的净利润率约等于收入的 28%，这已经相当夸张。 而且它未来收入还在以 50%+ 同比增长，前面一年更是 70%+ 同比增长。 如果你看过 $META，就知道用户变现空间能有多大。Reddit 的变现上限非常高。 它在 IPO 之后其实已经去风险了，因为 Reddit 现在是市场上增长最快、利润率最高的公司之一。 有一天如果它像 $CRCL 财报后那样突然暴涨，我们会回头发现，原来它当时只有 240 亿美元市值。
英文原文
$RDDT is getting ridiculous. Looks completely mispriced. Now down 40% over the past few months. If you strip out carry-forward losses, their net profit is ~28% of revenue, which is absolutely enormous. And they’re growing forward revenues 50%+ Y/Y after 70%+ Y/Y growth. If you ever look at $META, you know how much revenue can be optimized/user. There’s an incredibly high ceiling for monetization with Reddit. It’s already derisked since IPO since Reddit is now one of the fastest growing and highest margin companies in the market. One day if it pulls a $CRCL post earnings, we’ll look back and wonder how this was valued at $24 billion MC.
-
继续看好 AAOI，认为市场忽略其产能与链路价值
$AAOI 没有发生什么新变化，看起来反而是个买入机会。 我同意 Rosenblatt 分析师的说法： “这家公司不到 80 亿美元的市值，和它 2027 年可能达到 40 亿美元的收入相比，实在太低了。” 分析师可以对执行能力保持谨慎，而产能扩张从一开始就是核心问题。 我不觉得这里有什么新东西，这类争论只会一直持续到他们真正交付为止。 超大客户需求不是问题。 $GOOGL 和 $AVGO 也都发出了可插拔收发器生命周期延长的信号，但由于 $AAOI 覆盖了从激光到设计再到组装的整条供应链，它拥有很多人忽略的可选性。
英文原文
Nothings changed with $AAOI and it looks like a buying opportunity. I’d side with Rosenblatt analysts here where “The company’s sub-$8B market cap is too low when its 2027 revenue potential is $4B”. Analysts can be bearish on execution, and scaling capacity was always the focal question. Don’t think anything’s new around here and this will always be debated until they actually deliver. Hyperscaler demand is not a question. $GOOGL and $AVGO also signaled pluggable transceiver life extensions, but since $AAOI covers the supply chain from laser to design to assembly, they can have optionality that most people miss
-
认为 Soitec 仍有很大上行空间
Soitec（$SOI / $SLOIF）现在已经涨了 45.58%。 考虑到它在硅光和 CPO 架构中的衬底级垄断，这只票离天花板还远得很。
英文原文
Soitec ( $SOI / $SLOIF ) is now up 45.58%. This has a long way to go given their substrate-level monopoly over the silicon photonics and CPO architectures. https://t.co/P1hDh8UL9q
-
认为 upstream 供应商未必都已被定价
“都已经被定价了。” 但与此同时，$TSEM 年初至今还在 -1.89%。 很多散户其实比机构更早动手。 $AXTI 就是最好的例子——它在过去三个月里翻了 4 倍。 对于像 $SOI 和 $TSEM 这种利基上游供应商，我还是不太相信“已经定价”这个说法；但对 $LITE 和 $COHR，我大概率会认同。
英文原文
“Priced in”. Meanwhile $TSEM is chilling at -1.89% YTD. Lot of retail are earlier than institutions. $AXTI was the perfect example before it went up 4x in the past three months. Don’t quite think so with niche upstream suppliers like $SOI and $TSEM but likely yes to $LITE and $COHR