全部推文

共 6749 条 · 第 84 / 225 页 · 滚到底自动加载更多

  1. 个股论点 $AXTI$IREN

    解释 AXTI 增发提案的稀释幅度,认为若通过会对股价不利。

    如果你在关心 $AXTI: 它在这条新的潜在稀释消息出来后跌了 21%。 董事会想再增加 5000 万股(最高可稀释到 20 亿美元级别),要在 14 号的股东投票里决定。 也就是从 7000 万股增加到 1.2 亿股。 我对 $IREN 那种 60 亿美元过度稀释也是同样看法,而我持有的 AXT 这份价格提案也是一样。 我不会“相信管理层会明智使用”这些股份,而且这份文件本身就是个危险信号。 不过话说回来,我们就看 14 号会发生什么。如果它通过了这 5000 万股的新增授权稀释,我个人不会继续持有。 但如果它没通过,我预计会反弹。

    英文原文

    If you’re curious about $AXTI: It’s down 21% on the new potential dilution news. Board wanted to add 50M more shares (up to $2B worth to dilute) for shareholders vote in the 14th. 70m -> 120m shares. I say this about $IREN excessive $6B dilution and it’s the same with AXT price proposal that I hold. I would not “trust in management” to use it wisely and the fact it’s filed is a red flag. That being said: we’ll see what happens on the 14th. If it passes for 50m more share authorized dilution, I personally would not hold. But it fails, I expect a recovery.

  2. 杂谈

    表示看到大家在 Hammond 讨论里的行业经验很酷。

    @BrokeDadCapital 在评论里看到大家分享 Hammond 相关的行业经历,感觉很酷。

    英文原文

    @BrokeDadCapital Super cool to hear industry experiences around Hammond in the comments

  3. 杂谈

    说 Hammond 口碑不错,但讨论的人并不多。

    @zephyr_z9 @rwang07 Hammond 看起来口碑不错,不过真正在谈它的人并不多。

    英文原文

    @zephyr_z9 @rwang07 Hammond seems well liked. Not rlly many people talking about it though

  4. 供应链分析

    指出变压器是当前很大的瓶颈,海外也在抢货。

    @clarity_99X 现在变压器的瓶颈真的很大,大约一种型号要等 2 年,其他类型要等 3 到 5 年。 超大规模客户现在都在海外四处抢货,而且刚好有一家相对较小、加拿大市值 20 亿多的大公司掌握了很大的市场份额。

    英文原文

    @clarity_99X Yeah there’s a pretty big transformers bottleneck right now ~2Y for one type and 3-5Y for the others. Hyperscalers are kinda scrambling abroad for them, and it just so happens there’s one relatively small 2B+ CAD company with a very large market share. https://t.co/qUZ4TsWOys

  5. 供应链分析 $AMZN$MSFT$META$GOOGL$ORCL

    用订单和 backlog 说明变压器 / 开关设备是数据中心的关键瓶颈。

    当前瓶颈:变压器 / 开关设备。 交易思路:在 184 加元买入 Hammond(约 22 亿加元 / 15 亿美元)的多头。 它们主导的市场包括: - 变压器(干式,多年瓶颈,约占市场 23%) - 开关设备(2-3 年瓶颈) - 还生产液体型产品(5 年瓶颈,规模更大) 我个人预计其价格会像 NAND 一样上调,因为 $AMZN、$MSFT 等公司都在争夺配额。 你可能见过这类说法: “美国一半的数据中心建设被推迟或取消,增长受限于电力基础设施短缺”…… 再往下看: “为了解决短缺……加拿大、墨西哥……成了 AI 数据中心高压变压器的最大供应国”…… 猜猜谁在加拿大的 Guelph、墨西哥的 Monterrey 3 和 4,以及美国都有布局? Hammond。 再看文章引用的,为什么超大规模客户的数据库扩张正在崩掉: “这些挫折背后的主要原因,是关键电气组件的可获得性——比如变压器、开关设备。” 机构大概都在看 Powell、Eaton 之类的公司……但他们可能不知道? 这些公司其实会买 Hammond 的变压器再装进自己的开关设备里(“大量卖给数据中心、开关设备制造商”)。 它们在变压器市场的份额其实很大(例如干式约 23%)。 最有说服力的信号: -> 2025 年 backlog 同比增长 122%。我们可以据此推测超过 10 亿加元。 例如,公司 2025 年销售额为 8.98 亿加元,产能已经顶到上限。管理层说,2025 年第三季度末的订单价值相当于整个第三季度 backlog 的 53%。 考虑到 2025 年第四季度营收是 2.54 亿,而 backlog “翻了一倍多”,我们可以推算总 backlog 超过 10 亿加元。 另外: “去年毛利率压缩是因为墨西哥工厂建设,但预计毛利率都会上升,工厂扩建会在 2026 年第二季度转化为加速收入增长”,也就是现在。 下行风险在于原材料成本(铜、电工钢)如果再次上升,不过既然处在这种瓶颈里,他们是可以提价的。 我个人的 2026 年前瞻市盈率估计大概是 18-21 倍,2027 年不到 15 倍,因为有产能爬坡。 但如果他们能一边提价,一边接到超大规模客户的紧急订单,前瞻市盈率甚至有可能到个位数。不过那可能会和新并购混在一起。 总之它还是很便宜。 简单总结一下: $AMZN、$MSFT、$META、$GOOGL、$ORCL 的数据中心正在被变压器 / 开关设备短缺卡住。 市场似乎错过了这家市场份额很大的小公司,尽管它有 backlog 可见度,而且随着产能扩张上线,营收还在增长。 我个人觉得很有吸引力,所以建了多头仓位。 当然,这只是我的个人想法,做决定前请自己 DYOR。

    英文原文

    The current bottleneck: Transformers/Switchgear. 

Trade Idea: Long Hammond (~2.2B CAD / ~$1.5B USD) at 184 CAD. They dominate the market for: -Transformers (dry, multi year bottleneck ~23% of market), -serve to switchgear (2-3Y bottleneck) -and manufacture liquid too (5Y, larger bottleneck) 
I personally anticipate components price hikes like NAND, as $AMZN, $MSFT and others compete for allocation. 

You might have seen: “Half of US data center builds have been delayed or canceled, growth limited by shortages of power infrastructure”… Then you go further:

“To address shortages… Canada, Mexico… became the biggest suppliers of high-power transformers for AI data centers to AI data centers”

Guess who is in Canada (Guelph).. Mexico (Monterrey 3 and 4)… and the US?

Hammond

Then here’s the reason the articles cite why hyperscaler DB buildouts are falling apart: 
 “Major reason behind these setbacks is the availability of key electrical components — such as transformers, switchgear”.  Institutions are probably looking at Powell, Eaton, and others… but little do they know? Companies like these actually buy Hammond’s transformers to put inside their own switchgear (“strong sales into data centres, switchgear manufacturers")

Their market share over the transformers market is actually pretty large (eg. ~23% dry).  
The most compelling signal:

-> 122% Y/Y 2025 backlog increase. And we can infer this to be 1B+ CAD.  Eg. company achieved 898m CAD in sales in 2025, capacity ceiling. Management said close of Q3 2025 orders were valued at 53% of the entire closing third-quarter backlog. Given that Q4 2025 revenue was 254 million and the backlog is "more than doubled," we can infer a total backlog value exceeding 1 billion CAD. Also: 
“Gross margin compression last year was due to the buildout of their Mexico facility, but both gross margins are expected to increase and the facility expansions are expectied to turn into accelerated revenue Q2 2026)” which is now.

Downside is if raw material costs (copper, electrical steel) spike again, but given this bottleneck, they can price hike. 

Personal FWD P/E estimates would be ~18-21 for 2026, <15 for 2027 from volume ramp. But I think it’s possible to hit single digit fwd P/E if they do price hikes mixed with hyperscaler emergency orders. But that might get a little mixed with the new acquisition. Regardless still looks cheap. 
 Just a TLDR:  
$AMZN, $MSFT, $META, $GOOGL, $ORCL datacenter are being bottlenecked because of a lack of transformers/switchgear.

Seems like markets missed this little player with large market share, despite backlog visibility and increasing revenue from capacity expansion coming online. I personally found it pretty compelling, so I went long. Just sharing my personal thoughts, of course DYOR before making any decisions yourself.

  6. 个股论点 $AEHR

    认为 AEHR 仅一天就涨幅可观,可能被低估。

    $AEHR 这波真是很快。 涨了 14.28%……我原本确实觉得它是下一个硅光瓶颈中心,市值大概 11 亿美元,还有很多超大规模客户在做认证。 可能之前确实低估它了。

    英文原文

    Well that was fast with $AEHR. Up +14.28%… I did think the center of the next silicon photonics bottleneck at $1.1B, with tons of hyperscalers qualifying it. Was kind of undervaluing it. https://t.co/gDVc6xzF85

  7. 杂谈

    抱怨自己发言被 X 审查。

    @SpaceSector001 不是啊,我只是因为拿 Mariachi 乐队和 capex 开了个玩笑,X 的负责人就把我评论审查掉了。 而且我连问一句费用或溢价到底去哪了都不行。 我就只是个普通人在这儿。

    英文原文

    @SpaceSector001 Nah, head of X censored my comments for joking about Mariachi bands and capex. And I can't even ask a question about where any of the fees or premiums go. Just a random on here

  8. 杂谈

    要求对费用去向保持透明。

    @funniestlines 他们至少应该透明说明费用都去哪了。 最糟糕的就是不回答,然后直接关掉工单。 我只是想问一下费用拆分,应该不难吧?

    英文原文

    @funniestlines The least that they can do is provide a transparent breakdown on where the fees go. The worst they can do is not answer then close the ticket. I’m just asking for transparency on fee breakdown, it shouldn’t be difficult?

  9. 杂谈

    吐槽自己被收取远超实际金额的费用。

    @KiakotosC 很抱歉听到你支付的费用竟然是实际应收金额的 240%。 我只是想知道那多出来的溢价到底去哪了。 但他们不回答,反而说自己不能答复,然后把工单关了。

    英文原文

    @KiakotosC Sorry to hear that you’re paying 240% of what the actual charge is supposed to be. I’m just wondering where all that extra premium charge goes to. But instead of replying they say they can’t answer then close the ticket.

  10. 杂谈

    说自己是最支持 Elon 的,但仍然被莫名屏蔽。

    我其实是最支持 Elon 的 humanoid / space 计划的人了,而且我和 DOGE、Neuralink、SpaceX 那些正在和 Elon 面试的人都很熟。 所以我真不知道 Nikita 为什么要把我那条拿 Mariachi 乐队和 capex 开玩笑的评论屏蔽掉…… 我明明是支持 X 的,但现在完全不知道到底发生了什么。

    英文原文

    I’m literally the most pro-Elon humanoid/space program there is and I’m close friends with ppl from DOGE, Neuralink, SpaceX and others doing interviews with Elon. Not sure why Nikita blocked and hid my comment when I joked about Mariachi bands and capex… Like I’m supportive of X but I have no clue what’s going on anymore.

  11. 杂谈

    质疑 X 对海外用户额外收费且拒绝解释。

    X 到底怎么了? 它居然对我的海外用户在订阅费基础上又加收了 46%。 我只是想问,多出来的这些溢价到底去哪了…… 我可是金融类里付费订阅人数最多的人之一。 -> 他们拒绝给一个简单答案,然后直接把工单关掉。 我一直努力劝别人继续留在 X 上,而不是去金融竞品平台……但这到底算什么? 我本来以为这个平台追求的是最大透明度?

    英文原文

    What's even going on at X? X is charging my foreign users an additional 46% on top of my subscription. I'm only asking where the additional premiums go to... From someone who has the most paid subscribers in the finance category. -> They refuse to give a simple answer and closes the ticket. I've been trying hard to advocate other users staying on on X compared to financial competitors... but wtf. I thought this platform was one seeking maximum transparency?

  12. 方法论 $AEHR$SIVE$SOI

    把内存仓位更集中到 SiPh/CPO 相关标的,并期待 SK 海力士和三星财报带来反弹。

    @B38B37 我个人把内存相关仓位更多转向了 SiPh/CPO 相关的名字,比如 $AEHR、$SIVE 和 $SOI。 我现在还是有不少内存敞口,只是比今年早些时候少一些。不过我确实预计接下来 SK 海力士和三星的财报会再带来一轮上涨。

    英文原文

    @B38B37 I personally pivoted concentration in memory more toward siph/cpo names like $AEHR $SIVE and $SOI. I still have a good amount of memory exposure but less than earlier this year. However I do expect the upcoming sk Hynix and Samsung earnings to trigger another rally

  13. 杂谈

    说很多公司找自己做 SPV 或基金,但觉得手续麻烦,暂时只想玩 X。

    @HeLiuLeo 现在很多公司都来找我,希望我去发起一个 SPV 或者让我来管一个基金。 我个人觉得这些只是多了点手续和额外麻烦而已。我也不觉得自己还需要那笔额外的钱。 所以我现在还是先继续在 X 上发帖,图个开心。

    英文原文

    @HeLiuLeo lot of firms reached out for me to launch a SPV or fund for me to manage. Imo just a bit of a hassle with paperwork and extra stuff. I don’t think I need the extra money either. So just having fun posting on X for now

  14. 杂谈

    感谢对方的一美元打赏,并表示更在意 thesis 被市场验证。

    @HeLiuLeo 谢谢这一美元!这对我意义很大。我其实更在意的是 thesis 能在市场里被验证,以及能用想法帮助别人,而不是这笔钱本身。 不过它确实够我早上买一杯拿铁了。

    英文原文

    @HeLiuLeo Thank you for the $1! Means a lot, I do care more about thesis validation in the market + helping others with ideas over the monetary amount. But it does help pay for a latte in the morning.

  15. 杂谈 $NVDA

    回忆自己做深度学习时准确率超过 DeepMind,还曾被英伟达招募。

    我以前在为一本自然类出版物搭建深度学习模型时,准确率其实还超过了 Google DeepMind。 后来 $NVDA 还试图招我去带他们的 AI 团队,哈哈。 最后我还是在做自己的事情,不过有一点编码背景确实很有帮助,能做出一些很酷的东西!

    英文原文

    I actually beat Google deepmind’s in accuracy back when I was building out deep learning models for one of my nature publications. $NVDA tried recruiting me to lead their AI teams after that lol. Ended up just doing my own things now but it does help to have some background in coding to do cool stuff!

  16. 方法论

    说自己为了研究,专门调过 LLM 和数据管线,不用 Bloomberg。

    @0xInitialAce 我其实自己把用于研究的 LLM + 数据管线都细调过了,因为我受够了 Gemini / ChatGPT 老是把事情搞错。 自定义工具确实帮了很多……我个人也不用 Bloomberg terminal 之类的东西。

    英文原文

    @0xInitialAce I actually fine turned my own LLM + data pipeline for my research cause I got tired of Gemini/chatgpt getting everything wrong. Custom tools helps quite a bit… I personally don’t use Bloomberg terminal and ithers

  17. 杂谈 $LITE$TSEM

    调侃自己被 Bloomberg 等称作 meme trader。

    @jamesxtrades 不知道啊,照 Bloomberg、FT、Reuters 这些说法,我算是个“meme trader”。 真不知道机构为什么会想去复制交易像 $LITE、$TSEM 这种 meme 股。

    英文原文

    @jamesxtrades Idk according to Bloomberg, FT, Reuters, and others I’m a “meme trader”. Not sure why institutions would want to copy trade meme stocks like $LITE, $TSEM and others.

  18. 业绩复盘 $TSEM$NBIS

    回顾 TSEM 从横盘到三周翻倍,怀疑机构开始跟单。

    我还是觉得 $TSEM 从年初到现在整年都横着走这件事挺好笑的。 我一做多,它现在三周里就快翻倍了。 这可是个 220 亿美元+ 的股票(体量接近 $NBIS)。 也许机构开始跟单了?

    英文原文

    I still find it funny $TSEM was flat the entire year to date. I go long and now it’s close to doubling in 3 weeks. This is a $22B+ stock BTW (close to $NBIS size). Maybe institutions started copy trading? https://t.co/kUqw9b6Ksk

  19. 供应链分析 $NBIS$CRWV$META

    认为超大规模客户延迟扩建带来的外溢,会利好 Neocloud。

    我最近对上个月那份报告想得更多了…… 我觉得它对 Neocloud 板块,比如 $NBIS,甚至 $CRWV,的利好可能比市场想象得更大。 原因在于超大规模客户扩建延迟所带来的外溢效应。 这也部分解释了为什么 $META 可能签了 270 亿美元的交易。 那些已经为扩建锁定了产能 / 组件订单的公司,大概率会成为赢家,因为其他竞争对手会被卡住。

    英文原文

    I’ve been thinking about this report more from last month… It’s probably extremely bullish for the Neocloud segment like $NBIS (and even $CRWV) more than markets think. Because of the hyperscaler buildout delay spillover. And partly why $META might have signed a $27B deal. Companies that already have secured capacity/component orders for their buildout are likely to be major winners as other competition stalls.

  20. 方法论 $SIVE$AEHR$AAOI$SOI$MRVL

    认为现在还很早,自己更偏好少数纯标的和更稳健的名字。

    还不算晚进场,实际上还非常早,正处在下一个拐点的起点。 如果让我现在选两只更小、更纯的标的,我个人会喜欢 $SIVE 和 $AEHR,再加一只 $AAOI 也许不错。 更稳一点的话,Win、$SOI、$MRVL 看起来都很扎实? 可选名字其实很多……

    英文原文

    Not really late too the party, it’s extremely early and at the beginning of the next inflection point. I personally like $SIVE, $AEHR if I had to pick two more smaller purer play companies around now, maybe throw in $AAOI on the next drop. For safer, Win, $SOI, $MRVL seem solid? Quite a lot of names…

  21. 杂谈 $MRVL

    说自己很喜欢 MRVL,但 Cramer 让自己不敢大仓位。

    @Grooovy718 我真的挺喜欢 $MRVL 的,但唯一让我不敢重仓的就是 Jim Cramer……

    英文原文

    @Grooovy718 I genuinely like $MRVL but the only thing keeping me away from larger concentration is Jim Cramer…

  22. 方法论 $AAOI$AEHR$LITE$SIVE$SOI$TSEM

    批评用传统模型建模CPO放量期收入,分享如何识别光子学超级周期中的纯正概念股。

    请停止尝试为2025-2026年CPO/SiPH放量期的收入建立模型了……当我上个月在约115美元(现已四舍五入到200美元)查看$TSEM时,前瞻市盈率压缩至约16-18倍(在成长情景下低至10-12倍)。同样的逻辑也适用于$AEHR/$SIVE/$SOI/Win Semi等其他标的。这是2026年上半年。量产的放量将出现在2026年下半年。我们正处在一个大规模超级周期的最早期阶段,而这些是我在光子学下一代架构变革中最纯正的概念股配置:用于测试、CW激光器、衬底和晶圆代工的公司,在光子学超级周期的新范式转换中占有一席之地。像$LITE或$AAOI这样我去年长期持有的公司已经跨越了多个周期。然而,最大的回报来自于提前预判哪些公司将在未来收入/TAM增长中获得最大收益(这部分尚未反映在当前股价中)。不是用过去2年的历史回报来计算公允价值。而且当我们看一个庞大的新型光子学TAM(lightcounting的牛市情景预测为1100亿美元以上),主要由使用CW激光器作为示例的架构驱动,或在良率方面遇到挑战。许多这类公司很可能会出现大幅重新定价。尤其是当我们看到下一代架构变革开始发生时,时间点大约在2026年下半年。

    英文原文

    Please stop trying to model 2025-2026 revenue for future CPO/SiPH ramp… When I looked at $TSEM back at ~$115 last month (round to $200 now). The forward p/e compressed to rates like ~16-18 (down to 10-12 in growth scenarios) Same applies to $AEHR / $SIVE / $SOI /Win Semi and other names. This is H1 2026. Volume ramp hits H2 2026. We’re at the very beginning of a massive supercycle and these are my more pure play exposure picks for the next architectural changes in photonics: For testing, cw lasers, substrates, and foundries in next paradigm shift in the photonics supercycle. Companies like $LITE or $AAOI that I’ve longed last year cover multiple cycles. However, the most returns comes from anticipating what benefits the most Mc wise relative to future revenue/TAM growth (not priced into current earnings). Not looking back at 2 year historical returns to calculate fair value. And when we’re looking at massive new photonics TAM ($110B+ bull case from lightcounting), largely driven from architecture that use CW lasers as an example or struggle with yields. A lot of these companies are likely going to re-rate hard. Especially when you look at the start of the next architectural changes, happening around H2 2026.

  23. 杂谈

    开玩笑说真正的瓶颈是一路上认识的朋友。

    @gauchos805 是的。但真正的瓶颈其实是我们一路上交到的朋友。

    英文原文

    @gauchos805 Yes. But the real bottleneck are the friends we made along the way

  24. 杂谈

    只有一条链接,没有可翻译文本。

    仅有链接。

    英文原文

    https://t.co/ZmIKd1xoSy

  25. 杂谈

    开玩笑不想因为“grab em by the Strait”成名。

    @Tkog65 我真心希望“grab em by the Strait”不要变成我在 X 上的成名梗……

    英文原文

    @Tkog65 I hope that “grab em by the Strait” doesn’t become my claim to fame on X…

  26. 杂谈

    说如果你能懂这些 FinX 梗,说明你在平台上待太久了。

    老实说…… 如果你能看懂这些引用,大概说明你在 FinX 待太久了: - “我不敢相信那条帖子是真的” - Analyst #3 - 🦑 - 🌮 - 🦞

    英文原文

    Honestly… You’re probably spending too much time on FinX if you know these references: - “I can’t believe that post was real” - Analyst #3 - 🦑 - 🌮 - 🦞

  27. 供应链分析

    判断台海冲突只是噪音,台湾供应链不会轻易被交给中国。

    @BgEdgelord 我觉得这就是个无关紧要的新闻。我几乎可以肯定美国会在军事上保卫台湾。 他们不可能就这么把整个供应链都拱手让给中国。 中国也知道这一点,而且也不会想和美国直接开战、引发核级别后果。

    英文原文

    @BgEdgelord I think it's a nothingburger. I'm almost certain US would militarily defend Taiwan. There's 0 shot they would just surrender our entire supply chain to China. And China knows this and would not want a Nuclear fallout with direct US conflict.

  28. 个股论点 $AAOI$AEHR$AVGO$COHR$CSCO$LITE$MRVL

    AEHR因拿下光学收发器大客户而上涨,若进入量产阶段股价或超$60

    这不是贪婪,这是基本面。$AEHR价格上涨是因为他们拿下了光学收发器(optical transceivers)领域的领导者。这可能是$AVGO、$LITE、$COHR、$MRVL、$CSCO或其他公司。市场是前瞻性的。以我之见,如果它进入像$AAOI那样的批量订单增长阶段,股价将会超越60美元。

    英文原文

    It's not greed, it's fundamentals. $AEHR went up in price is because they landed the leader in optical transcivers. This could be $AVGO, $LITE, $COHR, $MRVL, $CSCO or others. Markets are forward looking. IMO it will blow away $60+ if it shifts into mass order ramp like $AAOI earnings.

  29. 方法论 $AEHR$AMD$GOOGL$INTC

    认为 AEHR 未来量产爬坡是核心,当前财务无法体现。

    $AEHR 的财报应该会很有意思。 我以前没见过这么多超大规模客户 / 光收发器(可能是 $AMD、$GOOGL、$INTC 等)公司去给一家 13 亿美元市值的小公司做资格认证。 我猜也许下一次财报里,我们会看到更多量产爬坡的指引?他们上周才刚开始和那家新的光收发器公司做资格认证。 如果这次财报就发生那当然更好。市场是前瞻的,所以很多重估其实现在就会开始。

    英文原文

    $AEHR earnings should be fun. I haven't seen so many hyperscalers/optical transceiver (prob $AMD, $GOOGL, $INTC, and others) companies qualifying a small $1.3B company before. My guess is maybe next earnings, we'll see more volume ramp projections? They just begun qualification with that new optical transceiver company last week. Would be nice if it happened this ER though. Markets are forward looking, so a lot of the repricing would happen around now imo.

  30. 方法论 $FORM$KEYS$ASE$ATEYY$AEHR

    把 CPO / SiPh 测试瓶颈视作大机会,并点名相关公司。

    Digitimes:台湾正试图解决 CPO 测试瓶颈,以便 AI 数据中心的 SiPh 规模化。 很大。重点。就在:“CPO 和硅光瓶颈” + “测试”。 $FORM、$KEYS、$ASE 和 $ATEYY 是这个瓶颈里比较热门的名字,比如光学对准。 另外还有 $AEHR,可以提供对 SiPh 良率 / 测试瓶颈的敞口。 预测显示,到 2026 年,超过 50% 的数据中心收发器销售将来自硅光模块(SiPh)。 现在 2026 年,资格认证周期还挺多的: 但量产爬坡随时都可能到来。

    英文原文

    Digitimes: Taiwan tackles CPO testing bottlenecks to scale SiPh for AI data centers. Huge. Emphasis. on: "CPO and Silicon Photonics bottleneck" + "Testing." $FORM, $KEYS, $ASE, and $ATEYY are popular ones ones in this bottleneck eg. optical alignment. Then there's $AEHR for exposure to SipH yields/testing bottlenecks. Forecasts show that by 2026, over 50% of data center transceiver sales will come from silicon photonics (SiPh) modules. Right now, in 2026, there's quite still a few qualification cycles: But expect mass order ramp to hit anytime.