个股论点
围绕单一股票的投资逻辑与仓位表态 · 共 2504 条 · 滚到底自动加载更多
-
警示MSTR杠杆风险，看好AMZN/META波段，回避RIVN/TSLA。
呃，我不会建议粉丝在内容提供商(CSP)上使用2倍杠杆ETF，尤其是$MSTR，它本身波动性已经足够大。如果遭遇波动率衰减导致的强制平仓，情况可能会变得很糟，尽管我确实认为MSTR正在触底。 我同意大多数观点，比如AMZN或META，通常我会在$BULL跌至13美元左右时进行波段交易。 由于基本面原因，我不会碰$RIVN或$TSLA。
英文原文
Uh I would not tell followers about CSPs on 2x leveraged ETFs especially on $MSTR, which is volatile enough. If they get assigned with volatility decay it might get messy, though I do agree MSTR is bottoming. I'd agree on most though like AMZN or META, usually I swing trade $BULL low $13. I wouldn't touch $RIVN or $TSLA cause of fundamentals.
-
ALAB因覆盖五大科技巨头且高增长，有望复制英伟达路径实现千倍涨幅。
@regard_capital 我在这里写了一点关于 $ALAB 的内容 https://t.co/T28ztuSkgY $ALAB 之所以起飞，是因为 Astera 是唯一一家系统性暴露于五大科技巨头(Mag7)中5家的小盘股。 1. ALAB 的客户群字面意义上就是 Mag7：$GOOGL、$MSFT、$NVDA、$META 和 $AMZN。 2. 他们的增长率惊人，同比增长约 150%+，毛利率为 76%（高于 NVDA，是半导体市场中最高的之一）。 3. 正如 $GOOGL 财报所示，AI 支出的资本支出(Capex)仍在增加。 NVDA 从 1500 亿市值起步 -> 4 万亿+，因为超大规模数据中心需要 GPU。我们正处于 ALAB 在 AI 供应链中产生这种效应的起点，而其市值仅为 200 亿。 如果他们执行得当且 AI 基础设施建设继续，我们可能会看到下一个 1000% 的涨幅。
英文原文
@regard_capital I wrote a tiny bit about $ALAB here https://t.co/T28ztuSkgY
-
对比持有与期权策略，建议NBIS跌至96美元时买入LEAPS。
提醒一下，这全都是短期资本利得税！因此，持有股票获得的利润可能高于这种期权卖出策略。有时直接逢低买入 Weebius/$NBIS 更好，因为如果它单日下跌 6% 然后恢复至平盘，6% 的利润优于看跌期权(Put)的权利金。不过 $96 的行权价确实很安全，如果 $NBIS 再次跌至该水平，我会大量买入长期期权(LEAPS)。
英文原文
Just a reminder that this is all short term capital gains tax! So profits holding a stock might be more than this option selling style. Sometimes it's better to just buy the dip on Weebius/ $NBIS because if it drops 6% in a day then recovers to flat, cause 6% profit is better than premiums from puts. But yeah $96 strike is pretty safe, I'd switch buy a ton of leaps if they ever dropped to that level again on $NBIS.
-
建议利用NBIS或CIFR等高增长标的实现资产复利，而非止步于FIRE。
@wallstreetbets 太多人盯着财务独立与提早退休(FIRE)，却没意识到他们仍可以像南希·佩洛西那样，通过 $NBIS 或 $CIFR 这类标的，将 $5M 的投资组合复利增长至 $50m。
英文原文
@wallstreetbets Too many people looking at FIRE and not realizing they can still compound their $5M portfolio to $50m like Nancy Pelosi with stuff like $NBIS or $CIFR
-
建议全仓押注NBIS，认为其股价大概率从当前水平上涨。
@12345tgrf 我的意思是，如果必须全仓押注某只股票，我会选择 $NBIS。这取决于你的风险承受能力，但从股价走势来看，很难想象它不会从当前水平继续上涨。
英文原文
@12345tgrf I mean if I had to full port something it would be $NBIS. Depends on your risk tolerance, but share wise it's hard to see it ever not rising from these levels.
-
长期仅投RKLB，短期看好NBIS和CIFR的超大规模扩张。
@Melissa09744266 除非是 $RKLB，否则我不做长期投资，因为太空领域关乎国家安全，拥有巨大的护城河，且仅次于 SpaceX。不过，我预计 4-5 年后 AWS 和 GOOGL 的超大规模云服务商芯片可能会准备好。在那之前，我们仍处于以 $NBIS 和 $CIFR 为代表的超大规模扩张模式。
英文原文
@Melissa09744266 I don't long term invest unless it's $RKLB since space is a national security issue, huge moat m, and #2 second to SpaceX. But yeah I'd expect in 4-5 years AWS, GOOGL hyperscaler chips might be ready around then. Until then, we're in hyperscaling mode with $NBIS and $CIFR.
-
看好IREN年底前达80美元，认为NBIS将翻倍。
@95jG5OcU2mL0OCK 鉴于 $IREN 和这些新云(neoclouds)的增长速度，80美元是一个极其保守的目标价。我预计 $NBIS 至少会翻倍至225美元以上，因此 IREN 很可能在年底前触及80美元。
英文原文
@95jG5OcU2mL0OCK $80 is an extremely conservative price target given how fast $IREN and these neoclouds are growing. I'd expect $NBIS at least to double to $225+ so IREN would likely hit $80 before end of year.
-
感谢指正，补充因转型HPC而遗漏的$HIVE。
@ape_hodling 你说得对，感谢指出 $HIVE。是的，我漏掉了它，因为他们的业务正从挖矿转向高性能计算(HPC)。
英文原文
@ape_hodling You're right, thanks for pointing out $HIVE yeah I missed it in my bucket list since they're pivoting to hpc from mining
-
HIVE转型HPC领域前景看好，利好未来收入。
@Air_Airia 我花了一些时间深入研究（例如 https://t.co/WlUsSt7YIZ）。 看起来 $HIVE 正在转型进入高性能计算(HPC)领域，这对未来的收入增长非常有利。 虽然要真正了解这门业务可能需要一两个小时，但乍一看其发展方向很有前景。
英文原文
@Air_Airia Took me a bit to read into it (eg https://t.co/WlUsSt7YIZ). Looks like $HIVE pivoting into HPC which is really good for forward revenue. It would probably take me an hour or two to really get to know the business but at first glance it looks direction ally promising.
-
对比CRWV高息债务与NBIS优越融资条款
@Veganhippo21 @DeepValueBagger $CRWV 的债务利率超过 9%，而 $NBIS 的融资条款要好得多。
英文原文
@Veganhippo21 @DeepValueBagger $CRWV has 9%+ interest rate on debt while $NBIS fundraising terms are miles better
-
看好为微软和谷歌提供AI算力的小市值公司，认为其估值错配带来巨大非对称回报。
未来8-12个月可能是自这些市值仅30-50亿美元的小型公司开始为Google Cloud或Microsoft Azure提供AI算力以来，市场尚未意识到这一机会（直到某份财报发布）以来的最快上涨期。 这些公司的合同已锁定，例如5年期170亿美元的大单。但市场总是前瞻性的，因此4年后如果看起来它们将开始像苹果与高通那样进行业务转型，我们将看到重新估值。 但与此同时，一家为$MSFT Azure提供动力的公司市值260亿美元，而一家为$GOOGL云提供动力的公司市值40亿美元，其未来的营收潜力和非对称回报在接下来两年里显得荒谬得可笑。
英文原文
Probably fastest runup in the next 8-12 months since most people and markets still don't see the opportunity with all these tiny 3-5B companies powering AI compute for Google Cloud or Microsoft Azure yet until one of their earning reports. These are contracts already locked in like 5Y for 17 Billion but markets are always forward looking so after 4 years if it looks like they'll start to pivot off like how apple did with Qualcomm, we'll see a revaluation. But in the meantime 26B mc for a company powering $MSFT azure and 4B MC for a company powering $GOOGL cloud is hilarious forward rev potential and asymmetrical return next 2 years.
-
看好NBIS/CIFR，拒绝参与NUAI的恶性稀释。
@Lotterystonks @GClandesti37321 我很乐意在 $NBIS 或 $CIFR 以良好条款完成稀释并实现规模化后投资。但如果 $NUAI 以低于市场价95%的价格稀释现有持有者10亿美元以上，并将规模扩大至30多亿股，那我就不想参与。
英文原文
@Lotterystonks @GClandesti37321 I'm happy to invest like $NBIS or $CIFR after they completed their dilution at good terms and are scaling. But if $NUAI are diluting existing holders $1B+ and scaling that to 3B+ more shares at 95% under market rate, then I don't want to participate.
-
博主区分成长与价值投资，推荐不同周期的个股组合。
@DeepIceValue 哈哈，我看到了 $NVO 和 $UNH，然后看了你的主页，意识到你更偏向价值投资(Value Investing)。如果让我选，1-2 年周期我会选 $NBIS 或 $TSM。3 年周期我会选 $RKLB。价值投资组合(Value Investing Basket)会是：$TGT, $UPWK, $PYPL, $LULU, $UNH, $NVO。
英文原文
@DeepIceValue lol I saw NVO and UNH and then looked at your profile and realized it was more so value investing. If I had to choose, would be $NBIS or $TSM 1-2 years. Then $RKLB for a 3 year timeframe. Value investing basket would be: $TGT, $UPWK, $PYPL, $LULU, $UNH, $NVO
-
指出某股虽适合短期交易，但因稀释股权不适合长期持有。
@GClandesti37321 没问题，任何一家市值4000万美元的上市公司都有其存在的原因。 当然可以权衡风险收益比，但类似于 $BKKT 那样不断稀释股东权益的公司，它是一笔有趣的短期交易，却是极差的长期持有标的。
英文原文
@GClandesti37321 no problem, there's always a reason why something is a 40m market cap publicly traded company. can always take the risk/reward but similar to $BKKT that always dilutes their shareholders, it's a fun short term trade, terrible long term hold.
-
买入IREN，看好其获超大规模云服务商合同潜力。
@cronked 谢谢！回复晚了，但在下跌后我买入了一些 $IREN。它比 $NBIS、$CIFR、$WULF 更具投机性，但我预计未来会有超大规模云服务商(hyperscaler)的合同。显然 $NBIS 的非对称回报(asymmetric return)潜力最大，但拥有其他新云(neoclouds)公司也不错。
英文原文
@cronked Thanks! late reply, but I bought some $IREN after the drop. It's more speculative than $NBIS, $CIFR, $WULF, but I'd expect a hyperscaler contract down the road. Obviously $NBIS is most asymmetric return but wouldn't be bad to have other neoclouds up there too
-
警告 $NUAI 严重稀释风险，认为散户难获益。
我之前研究过 $NUAI，除非他们进行再融资，否则其稀释问题对散户投资者来说是一个危险信号。他们与 ATW AI LLC 有一项股权融资协议，允许以 95% 的市场折扣发行价值 10 亿美元的股票。重申一遍：存在远低于市场价的稀释潜力。他们还提议另外授权发行 30 亿股以上。除非他们进行再融资或避免从员工持股计划 (EPFA) 中提款，否则我看不到散户持有者除了短期拉升和大幅扩张营收（这涉及稀释和融资）之外，还能从持股中获得什么好处。
英文原文
I looked into $NUAI earlier, their dilution is a red flag for retail investors unless they refinance. They have an equity financing with ATW AI LLC allowing issuance of $1B of shares 95% market discount. Repeat: Way below-market dilution potential. They also proposed another 3B+ share authorization. Unless they refinance or avoid drawing from the EPFA, I don't see how retail holders can benefit from holding shares apart from short term pumps + expanding rev by a ton (which involves dilution + financing).
-
NBIS因微软大单、优质资产及强劲财务成为首选。
是的，$NBIS 是毫无悬念的首选。$170 亿的微软 (MSFT) 交易为期 5 年，因此收入爬坡最快，这还不包括更多交易。他们拥有大量优质公司，例如 30% 的 Clickhouse（Anthropic 使用）。资产负债表强劲（例如已筹集 $138 亿+，仅 $40 亿+），不像 $CRWV 那样有重大利息负担。NBIS 做全栈 (Full Stack)，业务更多元化，毛利率高。在 260 亿市值下，整体价值极其惊人。
英文原文
Yeah, $NBIS is #1 choice by a longshot. $17B MSFT deal was over 5 years so fastest revenue ramp, not including more deals. They own a ton of great companies like 30% Clickhouse, which Anthropic uses. Great balance sheet (eg. $4B+ raised $138+), no major interest like $CRWV. NBIS does full stack, more diversified businesses already, large gross margins. All-around such an incredible value at 26B.
-
解析超大规模云厂商资本支出向NeoClouds转移的逻辑，看好NBIS等标的的高回报潜力。
NeoCloud 论点：超大规模云厂商资本支出漏斗 为什么我要投入 150 万美元以上到 NeoClouds（新型云服务商），以及为什么这可能带来 200-300%+ 的回报。 🔹 分类 Mag7（美股七巨头）合约方：$CRWV, $NBIS ✅, $WULF, $CIFR ✅ 带算力：$IREN ✅, $BITF 投机性：$WYFI, $GRRR ✅, $SLNH 转向 HPC（高性能计算）的矿工：$RIOT, $MARA, $CLSK, $HUT 论点： Mag7 的 AI 算力紧张，这是 $NVDA 设计使然。 原本流向 AWS、MSFT Azure、Google Cloud 用于传统算力的数万亿美元资本支出，当它们无法处理来自 Anthropic、OpenAI、Gemini 等的新 AI 负载时，现在将漏斗式流入 NeoClouds。 这是一个十年一遇的机会，类似于让 $NVDA 成为 4 万亿美元公司的 GPU 军备竞赛，关键在于未来 5-10 年为 AWS/Azure 等提供基础设施支持的是谁。 NBIS（来自 MSFT 的 170 亿）、CIFR / WULF（来自 GOOGL 的 30 亿）、CRWV（由 NVDA 背书）都在以数百百分比的速度扩张（NBIS 季度收入从 1.5 亿增长到可能超过 15 亿），且拥有 60-80% 的毛利率。 这种收入增长在历史上几乎闻所未闻。这主要是因为最富有的超大规模云厂商将资本支出漏斗式注入这些小公司。 NVDA / TSM（2022->）：为超大规模云厂商提供 GPU CRDO / ALAB（2024 ->）：超大规模云厂商获胜 -> 抛物线式增长。 NBIS/CIFR/IREN 等（2025 - ）AWS/Azure 等 -> 来自 AI 算力的抛物线式增长 这就是如何获得数百百分比回报的方法，而不是在 Paypal 上进行价值投资。动量交易下一代公司。 所以看空论点通常涉及 - 执行风险（以前更偏向投机，现在像 NBIS 这样的公司有 40 多亿资金来执行） 人们总是担心执行问题，但如果微软或谷歌没有做自己的尽职调查，是不会签署如此大的 5-10 年合约的。 - 高利率（主要看你 CRWV），这就是为什么 NBIS、CIFR 等具有惊人的回报潜力。 $NBIS 在每股 138 美元以上时有 40 多亿资金（现在是 107 美元）。$CIFR 在每股 16 美元以上时有资金（现在是 11 美元）。高于当前价格的资金是一个看涨信号。 - GPU 折旧（有效的担忧，但这几乎像石油一样，即使是旧型号也保持了价值并仍然提供权益）。 - 估值（我认为我们才刚刚开始。如果 NBIS 明年规模达到 60 亿收入，75% 毛利率），260 亿市值非常小。 - NVDA 可能推出自己的 GPU 即服务并直接竞争。目前这些 NeoClouds 是 NVDA 防止对 Azure/AWS 等集中风险的答案。 - 定制超大规模云厂商芯片如 TPU、Trainium。但可能还需要几年，因为他们仍在乞求 NVDA 算力并签署了 5-10 年合约。 无论如何，像 Nebius 这样的 NeoClouds 相对于远期收入/毛利率确实被低估了。 我们仍然处于非常早期的阶段。确保像特朗普选举时的 Crypto/TSLA 或 OpenAI 发布时的 NVDA 一样搭乘 NeoCloud 浪潮。 当然，这高度投机，我不会建议全仓 YOLO，但对于这些为 Google/MSFT 等（Mag7 的现金牛）提供 AI 工作负载的小型 5-200 亿 NeoClouds，风险与回报是值得的。（交易时间范围：8 个月 - 1 年。） 这是 2025-2026 年最好的非对称 AI 基础设施交易。
英文原文
The NeoCloud Thesis: Hyperscaler Capex Funnel Why I'm putting $1.5M+ into Neoclouds, and why this might be a 200-300%+ return. 🔹 Buckets Mag7 contracts: $CRWV, $NBIS ✅, $WULF, $CIFR ✅ With compute: $IREN ✅, $BITF Speculative: $WYFI, $GRRR ✅, $SLNH Miners pivoting to HPC: $RIOT, $MARA, $CLSK, $HUT Thesis: Mag7 is AI compute strained, by design from $NVDA. Trillions of capex that normally flowed through AWS, MSFT Azure, Google Cloud for traditional compute, will now funnel into NeoClouds when they cant handle new AI loads from Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, etc. This is a once-a-decade opportunity, similar to the GPU arms race that made $NVDA a $4T company, on who powers the infra for AWS/Azure/etc for the next 5-10 years. NBIS (17B from MSFT), CIFR / WULF (3B from GOOGL), CRWV (backstopped by NVDA) are all scaling hundreds of percent (NBIS went from 150M quarterly revenue to likely 1.5B+) with 60-80% gross profit margins. This revenue growth is almost unheard in history. It's mainly because it's the wealthiest hyperscalers funneling capex into tiny companies. NVDA / TSM (2022->): GPU for hyperscalers CRDO / ALAB (2024 ->): hyperscaler wins -> parabolic growth. NBIS/CIFR/IREN/etc (2025 - ) AWS/Azure/etc. -> parabolic growth from AI compute This is how you get hundreds of % in return, not value investing in Paypal. Momentum riding the next generational companies. So bear thesis usually involves around - Execution Risk (before it was more speculative, now companies like NBIS have 4B+ to execute) People can always worry about execution but Microsoft or Google would not be signing such large 5-10 year contracts without their own DD. - Large interest rates (mainly looking at you CRWV), that's why NBIS, CIFR, and others have potential amazing returns. You have 4B+ in funding for $NBIS at $138+ a share (when it's $107 now). And funding for $CIFR at $16+ a share when it's $11 now. ABOVE current price funding is a bullish tell. - GPU depreciation (valid concern but it's almost like oil, even older models kept their value and still deliver equity). - Valuation (I still think we're just getting started. If NBIS scales to 6B rev next year 75% gross margin), 26B marketcap is extremely tiny. - NVDA potentially launching their own GPU-as-a-service and directly competing. Right now these Neoclouds are NVDA's answer to preventing concentration risk to Azure/AWS/etc. - Custom hyperscaler chips like TPU, Trainium. But likely years away, since they're still begging for NVDA compute and signed 5Y-10Y contracts. Regardless these neoclouds like Nebius are really undervalued relative to forward revenue/gross margins. We're still very early. Make sure to ride the Neocloud wave like Crypto/TSLA with Trump election or NVDA with OpenAI release. Of course this is highly speculative and I wouldn't YOLO full port calls, but Risk vs. Reward on these little 5-20B neoclouds powering AI workloads for Google/MSFT/etc, the cash cows of Mag7, is worth it. (Trade time Horizon: 8m - 1 year.) This is the single best asymmetric AI infrastructure trade for 2025-2026.
-
HIMS大幅降价促增长，预期股价涨至100美元。
@unusual_whales 随着价格下调1000%，$HIMS 将开始付费让大家服用 🐓药丸。股价很快将升至100美元，人口激增，感谢特朗普。
英文原文
@unusual_whales With 1000% price reduction, $HIMS will start to pay everyone to take 🐓pills. $100 share price soon and population boom, thanks Trump
-
作者认为 PayPal 适合交易而非投资，建议关注 2026 年 3 月 $60 看涨期权。
@DeepValueBagger @PaperBozz @FrostyFinances 哦，是的，我对 PayPal 也有类似的看法。我不会将 $PYPL 股票作为投资标的，但它看起来适合交易。比如，如果有人在 2026 年 3 月买入 $60 的看涨期权，可能会获得不错的收益。
英文原文
@DeepValueBagger @PaperBozz @FrostyFinances Oh yeah I had the similar thoughts about PayPal. I wouldn't touch $PYPL shares as an investment but it does look decent for trading. Like Mar 2026 $60 calls would probably print a decent amount if someone did it.
-
看好NBIS期权未平仓量激增，目标价150-200美元。
@babyfolio 哦，是的，它们仅用于日内/波段交易。我不相信其中一半的说法，但总体而言，应该是盈利的。 我同意 $NBIS 将涨至 150-200+ 美元。场外看跌期权(OTM Calls)的未平仓合约量实在太多了，所以接下来的走势应该会很有趣。
英文原文
@babyfolio Oh yeah they're just for day/swing trading. I don't believe in half of them but overall, should be profitable. I agree with $NBIS to $150-200+ though. There's way too many open interest calls OTM so now things should be interesting.
-
博主在当前位置买入IBIT，但不看好ETH。
@3KComeback 是的，在这些价位买入相当数量的比特币现货ETF($IBIT)。不过我不看好以太坊($ETH)。
英文原文
@3KComeback Yeah buying a decent amount of $IBIT at these levels. I don't like $ETH though.
-
凭直觉认为$CRM在$243的看涨期权表现良好。
$CRM 的看涨期权在 $243 这个价位看起来也不错，只是凭一种模糊的直觉。
英文原文
$CRM calls also looks good somehow at $243, just a fuzzy feeling
-
持仓观望一个月，看财报后是否复刻AVGO走势。
@soulbiri1 不确定，先持有一个月看看它财报后是否会像 $AVGO 那样表现。 历史不会重演，但会押韵！
英文原文
@soulbiri1 Not sure, just holding it for a month to see if it pulls an $AVGO post earnings. History doesn't repeat itself but it rhymes!
-
定投ORCL并买入看涨期权，看好其远期营收潜力。
对 $ORCL 头寸进行定投(DCA)。在股价下跌 2.4% 时买入了一些 $284 的看涨期权(Call Options)。 可能会看到持续至 10 月初的抛售，但考虑到与 OpenAI、TikTok 等合作带来的巨大远期营收潜力，我认为风险收益比(Risk/Reward)是值得的。
英文原文
DCA's into $ORCL positions. Bought some calls $284, on the 2.4% drop. Could see extended selloff into very early October but too much forward rev potential with OpenAi, TikTok, etc so risk/reward is worth it imo https://t.co/wY2iMVK43u
-
博主因回调诱惑买入甲骨文看涨期权
@__visionxry__ 我最终买入了 $ORCL 看涨期权 lol，回调太诱人了 https://t.co/WOE1qNbq7I
英文原文
@__visionxry__ I ended up buying $ORCL calls lol, dip was too tempting https://t.co/WOE1qNbq7I
-
博主重申WSB上给出的60美元目标价，无视近期涨幅。
@taleino93 尽管自从我发布以来股价已上涨 20.8%，我在 wallstreetbets 上仍给出了 $60 的目标价(PT)！
英文原文
@taleino93 I gave a $60 PT on wallstreetbets even though it's up 20.8% since I posted!
-
指出$ORCL隐含波动率高，否则考虑买入看涨期权。
@__visionxry__ $ORCL 目前的隐含波动率(IV)也相当高。对于这家巨头来说，短期隐含波动率达到50%就算高了，否则我会在这个价位买入看涨期权。
英文原文
@__visionxry__ IV is pretty elevated for $ORCL too right now. 50% short term for that megacap is considered high otherwise I'd buy calls at this level
-
类比博通财报后走势，认为甲骨文因OpenAI合作具买入价值
@__visionxry__ 这让我想起 $AVGO 的财报表现，股价先剧烈波动（急涨急跌）持续约一个月，随后迎来猛烈的报复性上涨。目前走势可能更多受期权交易影响，而非基本面。如果按字面意思看待 OpenAI 的合作协议，$ORCL 是一个很好的买入标的。
英文原文
@__visionxry__ Reminds me of $AVGO earnings, spikes, dips for like a month, then face ripping rally. Probably more influenced by options rather than fundamentals at this point. If we go at face value of OpenAI deals, $ORCL is a great buy
-
超成长股遭抛售，矿企因降息预期下调而过度反应。
@claudiohrios 许多超高速增长股如 $ALAB、$CRDO，以及像 $IREN（忽略摩根大通的观点）、$NBIS、$CIFR 这样的矿企股票正面临大量抛售。前两者的抛售更有道理，但三次降息概率降低 8% 真的不值得矿企出现如此剧烈的抛售。
英文原文
@claudiohrios There's quite a lot of selling on a lot of hyper growth stocks like $ALAB, $CRDO, miners like $IREN (ignore J.P. Morgan), $NBIS, $CIFR. The first two make more sense, but decreasing triple rate cut odds by 8% really doesn't deserve this selloff for miners.