个股论点
围绕单一股票的投资逻辑与仓位表态 · 共 2208 条 · 第 4 / 45 页
-
认为 FLNC 因双 hyperscaler 合同会重估
@AorakiTrading 对，如果没有拿到 2 份 hyperscaler 协议，我不会去建仓。 像 $NBIS 那样的一份大型 $MSFT 合同，就足以让这种小型能源公司发生巨大重估。 但他们拿到的是 2 份，不止 1 份。
英文原文
@AorakiTrading Yeah, I wouldn’t have taken positions if they didn’t get 2 hyperscaler agreements. One large $MSFT contract as seen with $NBIS would likely cause a massive rerating for a small energy company like $FLNC. But they had 2, not just 1
-
提醒不要满仓，但看好 FLNC 的双 hyperscaler 合同
@Kevin1151268 呃……满仓从来不是最好的主意。 不过好消息是，$FLNC 还有两个新的 hyperscaler 合同，当前的 backlog / 财报里都还没算进去。 能同时给两个 hyperscaler 供货，对这么小的公司来说意义非常大，谁知道合同到底有多大。
英文原文
@Kevin1151268 Uhh… going all in is never the best idea. But on the bright side $FLNC has two new hyperscaler deals not included in their massive backlog / financials yet. Supplying to two different hyperscalers is enormous for a company this size, who knows how big the contracts are.
-
AAOI 基本面没变，只是短线波动更大
@Blake_BTFD $AAOI 没什么变化，只是短线价格变得更抖了？ 得习惯 Jane Street 带来的波动。我更多还是关心 1.6T 相关产能爬坡，以及财报里有没有额外的 hyperscaler 数字。 当前收入本身倒不是重点。
英文原文
@Blake_BTFD Nothing changed about $AAOI, just the short prices? Gotta get used to Jane Street adding volatility. Mostly curious about 1.6T related capacity ramp and any extra hyperscaler figures in their earnings. Not so much so about current revenues.
-
认为 FLNC 的两份 hyperscaler 合同会压制空头
@pennycheck 对，不太明白为什么很多基金喜欢做空美国能源公司的方向性。 未来几个月内如果这两份 hyperscaler 合同落实，虽然数量还不清楚，但对他们来说大概会很吓人。这样可能会让他们逐步降低 $FLNC 的风险敞口，反而增加买盘。
英文原文
@pennycheck Yeah not sure why many funds like directionality shorting US energy companies... Having 2 hyperscaler deals convert sometime in the next few months with unknown figures is probably scary for them. Would probably make them derisk $FLNC over time, adding to buying pressure.
-
在财报后看多 FLNC，认为双 hyperscaler 合同会重估
同意大方向，$FLNC 在财报后按 30 亿美元市值看其实挺有吸引力的。 能在这么小的市值上拿到 2 份直接 hyperscaler 合同，非常罕见。 $56 亿以上 backlog 已经降低了公司增长的风险，还不算新的 hyperscaler backlog，比如 $GOOGL 或 $MSFT。 这些 hyperscaler 合同是框架协议，很可能会在今年 Q3 很快转换，而且还没计入当前数字。 一旦公布，就是重大正面催化，类似半导体公司里的 qualification -> volume ramp。 Citi 分析师说："hyperscaler 订单的可能性会压过这一季度的几乎一切。我们预计公告会带来正面反应"。 我猜它们会在未来 3 个月内公布 hyperscaler 订单，之后大概率会被重估，所以我上了这艘船，把它当成短期催化交易。 如果按软件业务扩张后净利润约 2.88 亿美元（营收 60 亿美元，毛利率 13.0%）计算，2027 年前瞻市盈率大概 11.6 倍。 当前股价比 2 月价格低了 50%，但考虑到 hyperscaler 和 backlog 都在降低风险，我觉得这是一个很好的入场点（NFA）。
英文原文
Agreed high-level directionally, $FLNC compelling at $3B valuation post-earnings after taking a closer look. Very rare to see a US energy player that small get 2 direct Hyperscaler deals... The $5.6B+ backlog derisks the company growth, not including new hyperscalers backlog like $GOOGL or $MSFT. The hyperscaler deals were framework agreements, which are likely to convert "soon" Q3 this year, and aren't included in numbers. Once that's released it's major positive catalyst, similar to qualification -> volume ramp in semi players. Citi Analyst: "The possibility of a hyperscaler order will likely overshadow everything else in the quarter. We expect a positive reaction to the announcement" I'm going to go ahead and guess they'll likely rerated once they announce their hyperscaler orders maybe anytime in the next 3 months so I jumped on the boat as a short term catalyst trade. (not just 1 but 2) Also, if they hit ~$288M net income off gross-margin expansion ($6B revenue, 13.0% gross margins) from their software segment expansion, ~11.6x fwd p/e for 2027. The current stock price is -50% Feb's prices despite hyperscalers + backlog de-risking the company looks like a great entry point to me (NFA).
-
继续强调 SIVE 是 CPO 超级周期的优质敞口
@PhotonCap 对，$SIVE 是即将到来的 CPO 超级周期里非常有前景的敞口。
英文原文
@PhotonCap Yeah $SIVE is extremely promising exposure to the CPO supercycle coming up.
-
小幅加仓 SKC，但对债务驱动扩产保持谨慎
@TedWilliams1930 只是小幅加仓，做了些摊平。我在它涨 50% 之前就已经有 HB 了。 只是抛出一些想法，SKC 更有争议；如果扩产是靠债务推动、还有旧业务拖累，我会更谨慎。 但它确实是玻璃基板领域的领导者之一。
英文原文
@TedWilliams1930 Very tiny add, cost averaging. I had HB before it jumped 50% though. Just throwing out ideas, SKC is more questionable, I get more uneasy when buildout is fueled with debt + there’s legacy drag. But it is one of the leaders in glass substrates.
-
Auros 只是等三星和海力士认证后的放量
@PW8103841574101 Auros 没什么变化，它只是等 Samsung / SK Hynix 认证后开始放量。 我不控制日内波动。
英文原文
@PW8103841574101 Nothing's changed about Auros, it's just waiting for volume ramp after Samsung/SK Hynix qualification. I don't control day-to-day price movements.
-
作者认为量子点投资时机尚早，现在投$ALMU会被稀释，不如等规模扩大再说。
不，我的观点是量子点(quantum dot)技术还为时过早，像$ALMU这样的公司。现在投资可能只是在为他们的研发稀释机器提供资金。很可能会像2025年的$POET一样，以"$420M资产负债表"为名义不断进行ATM增发/稀释。我宁愿等到准备批量生产的时候再获得上涨空间。
英文原文
No, my opinion is quantum dot is way too early with names like $ALMU. Investing now likely just funnels their dilution machine for R&D. Likely will end up like 2025 $POET with constant ATMs/dilution for their "$420M balance sheet". Would prefer to just wait it out and get upside when it comes time to volume ramp.
-
比较 Auros 和 Towa 的不同风险画像
@2victorspoils 我更喜欢 Auros，因为它们和 SK Hynix / Samsung 的 HBM4 hybrid bonding 路线相关，估值大约 2.8 亿美元。 日本那边的 Towa 就更像是一家无聊但有垄断属性的复利型公司。 这只是我目前发过的其中一些名字，后面我还会分享更多。
英文原文
@2victorspoils I liked Auros for higher upside since they’re part of SK Hynix/Samsung Hbm4 hybrid bonding related roadmaps at ~$280mz Over in Japan, Towa was a bit of a more boring but monopolistic compounder. As the ones I’ve posted about so far. There’s a lot more, I’ll share a few later
-
怀疑 POET 上涨是因为空头太多
$POET 是有什么新消息吗…… 还是宇宙就是不喜欢空头？ https://t.co/8rYaWornYf
英文原文
Uh, was there any news with $POET … Or does the universe just not like short sellers? https://t.co/8rYaWornYf
-
利盟特姆业务广泛，2028年前满负荷订单，长期看好但短期不确定。
$LITE（利盟特姆）基本上什么都做，CW/EML激光器、光学引擎等。我主要用CPO增长曲线来分析像$SIVE或MSSCorps这种没有前期业务基础的纯概念公司。对于利盟特姆，你需要看整体TAM（总可寻址市场），从150亿增长到1540亿美元，因为他们的目标市场很广泛，包括CPO。他们在2028年前基本上是满负荷订单状态，尤其是与$NVDA的合作，这是最大的指标。我不认为他们会达不到盈利预期。但“达标”基本上是预期内的，所以不知道短期会怎么走，很多取决于期权流向，基本是抛硬币。长期方向上，我认为仍然值得持有，短期怎么走就见仁见智了。
英文原文
$LITE basically does everything, CW/EML lasers, optical engines, etc. I used CPO growth curves mainly for pure play names like $SIVE or MSSCorps that didn't have previous exposure. For Lumentum you want to look at overall TAM which was $15B -> $154B since they're kinda targeting most things, including CPO. They're basically fully booked through 2028, especially with $NVDA that's the biggest indicator. I don't see how they don't beat earning projections. But the "beat" is pretty much expected, so dunno which way it goes short term and a lot of it is option flow/coin flip. Directionally long term it's still a hold in my view, anyone's guess what happens short term.
-
看好 Shunsin 和 Foxconn 的组合
@tomhou101 对，我对 Shunsin 很有信心，因为 Foxconn 加上 GS 的 CPO 预测。 我真觉得很多人还不知道这个名字。
英文原文
@tomhou101 Yeah I feel really confident about Shunsin given Foxconn + GS CPO projections. I really think not many ppl know about this name yet.
-
认为市场还没把 SIVE 全部定价完
@bigjeffm 我真的不认为市场已经把 $SIVE 全部定价进去了。 这也是为什么它每天都还在涨 10% 到 20%。 事情不会一下子全部完成。
英文原文
@bigjeffm I really don't think markets have priced all of this in yet with $SIVE. Which is why it keeps going up 10-20% a day. It doesn't happen all at once.
-
长期极度看多 SIVE，按 GS 报告看是直线向上
@TR7016 对 $SIVEF 长期极度看多。 如果你看 Goldman Sachs 的 CPO 报告，接下来几年基本就是一条巨大的垂直线往上。
英文原文
@TR7016 Extremely bullish on $SIVEF, especially long term. If you look at Goldman Sach’s report on CPO it’s just a massive vertical line up over the next few years.
-
认为Sivers处于CPO超级周期初期，类比当初的AXTI和LITE
你听了吗，匿名者？ 我们仍然处于Sivers CPO（共封装光学）超级周期的非常初期阶段，这仍然令人疯狂。 这就是我一直叫出的那些名字最初的感觉，比如$AXTI，过去一年涨幅超过6000%+。 仍然认为Sivers是下一个$LITE。
英文原文
Did you listen anon? It’s still crazy we’re still only at the very beginning of a multi year CPO supercycle with $SIVE. This is what it feels like to be the very first to the names I’ve called out like $AXTI, up 6000%+ over the past year. Still think Sivers is the next $LITE. https://t.co/JdfMd7sNTK
-
认为SIVE估值被低估，重点关注管理层对CPO激光产量爬坡指引。
我个人认为 $SIVE 今天应该值 $30亿，明年最终会达到 $100亿以上。 财报其实不重要。我只关心管理层关于激光产量爬坡的指示，用于两个共封装光学(CPO)项目（$JBL 和可能的 $AAPL 硅光子学项目）。
英文原文
@TheGreekEuler I personally think $SIVE should be $3B today and ends up $10B+ next year. Earnings don’t really matter. Just care about indication from management about laser volume ramp for both CPO programs / $JBL and likely $AAPL silicon photonics program.
-
Auros是三星/SK海力士供应商，受益于HBM4混合键合计量和薄膜厚度测量两大产品线的量产增长。
所以我确实认为Auros (322310)在韩国是一家市值2.69亿美元、非常有趣的公司。 我从研究中发现，他们是一家相对不知名的三星/SK海力士供应商。 而且他们应该会从HBM4资本支出的混合键合计量(Hybrid Bonding Metrology)中获得高产量增长。 基本上是纯粹专注于两种产品： -> HBM4 / HBM4e / HBM5周期，之前$KLA在红外(IR)计量领域拥有垄断地位。 ---> 现在可能在三星工厂获得资格，下半年产能增长预计。SK海力士在升级到混合键合时也可能获得资格。 关于SK海氨酸的注意事项：我以为会是HBM4e，但显然Trendforce今天报道SK海力士已完成12层混合键合HBM验证，并正在提高量产良率。所以除了三星之外，可能还有一个催化剂。 -> 薄膜厚度测量(Thin-film thickness measurement)。 ---> 现在正在获得资格，与"主要国内芯片制造商"(可能是三星/SK海力士)合作，目标是今年实现批量供应。 免责声明(我持有仓位，不构成投资建议，请自己做尽职调查，这只是我的思考过程) 无论如何，他们在过去十年一直在开发，终于要从多年资格认证中将两种核心产品投入量产，可能是今年下半年。存在风险，例如不进入大批量生产(HVM)，但我个人承担这个风险。 所以我发现这家公司非常有趣，只是想分享一些关于这家公司的想法。
英文原文
So I do think Auros (322310) is very interesting at $269M MC over in Korea. What I've found from research was that they're a relatively unknown Samsung / SK Hynix supplier. And they should high volume ramp from HBM4 capex for Hybrid Bonding Metrology. Basically pure play on two products: -> HBM4 / HBM4e / HBM5 cycles, that $KLA had a monoply over for IR metrology. ---> Getting qualified now likely in Samsung factories, H2 volume ramp est. Sk Hynix likely qualifying too when they upgrade to hybrid bonding. Note on SK Hynix: I thought it would be HBM4e but apparently Trendforce reported today SK Hynix has completed 12-high hybrid bonding HBM validation and is raising yields for mass production. So maybe there's a catalyst there too aside from Samsung. -> Thin-film thickness measurement. ---> Getting qualified now, with "major domestic chipmaker" (likely Samsung/Sk hynix), targets mass supply this year. Disclosure (I do have positions, NFA, please do your own DD, this is just my thought process) Regardless, they've been developing for the past decade, only to volume ramp two core products from years of qualification likely H2 this year. There are risks involved, such as not proceeding to HVM, but I'm personally taking that risk. So I found this company very interesting, just wanted to publish some thoughts on this company.
-
看好SIVE和GFS，因其无晶圆厂模式易扩张，类似NVDA+TSM的成功路径
@Leon8995385220 $SIVE 可能已与 Win Semi（稳懋半导体）锁定产能分配协议以实现规模扩张，并与 $GFS（GlobalFoundries）合作。这就是为什么我对这两只股票都做多，作为无晶圆厂(fabless)模式容易扩张，有点像 $NVDA + $TSM。
英文原文
@Leon8995385220 $SIVE likely locked up allocation agreements with Win Semi to scale. And works with $GFS. Which is why I'm long on them both, easy to scale as fabless, kinda like $NVDA + $TSM.
-
认为 SLNH 对股权增值很差
@SingularityRes $SLNH 对股权增值来说简直是垃圾。 我真的不理解为什么有人会觉得他们能把股价做上去，结果却一直在被积极稀释。
英文原文
@SingularityRes $SLNH is utter garbage for equity appreciation. I'm just in disbelief people think they're going to have it appreciate in value when they're getting actively diluted $1 BILLION off a $219m MC.
-
批评IREN和SLNH的稀释性融资模式，提醒投资者远离毒性融资结构
$IREN 和 $SLNH 的投资者可能是我在 X 上互动过的最愚蠢的社区。 我从未见过一个社区对一家市值 $219M 的公司如此看涨，该公司正在进行新的 $1,000,000,000 稀释。 以及持续的 $500,000,000 ATM（在市场直接发售）。 然后你看 $IREN，拥有 $6,000,000,000 活跃 ATM，持续随时间向公开市场抛售股票。 也许，一个更好的做法是去做多一只没有毒性融资的股票……这样你才能真正从股权升值中受益，而不是仅仅充当流动性。 真的很难向那些缺乏脑细胞的人解释金融稀释的细微差别。 而偏偏 $SLNH 在提交 $500M ATM 后立即被 $BKKK、$IREN 投资者正面提及，因为他们需要退出流动性。 公司正在直接把股票卖给这些傻瓜。
英文原文
$IREN and $SLNH investors are probably the most braindead communities I've interacted with on X. I've never seen a community so bullish on a $219M MC stock that has a new $1,000,000,000 dilution. And an ongoing $500,000,000 ATM. Then you have $IREN, with $6,000,000,000 active ATM, sold over time into the open market. Maybe, it's a better idea to just go long on a stock without the toxic financing... So you can actually benefit from equity appreciation without just being liquidity? It's just so hard to explain to people the nuances in financial dilution who lack the brain cells. And it just so happens $SLNH gets mentioned positively by $BKKT, $IREN investors the moment after they file a $500M ATM since they need exit liquidity. The company is selling offloading shares directly to these idiots.
-
认为 2.5% 稀释只是为纳斯达克上市筹资
@hcnyl0819 这就是为了纳斯达克上市融资的 2.5% 微不足道稀释。 和字面意思的稀释不同，这其实是一个非常看多的事件。
英文原文
@hcnyl0819 This is literally the 2.5% microscopic dilution to get funding for NASDAQ listing for $SIVE. It's a highly bullish event contrary to the word dilution.
-
认为被设计出局是短期必然
@Belisapata 短期看，它们在未来一代里大概率会被设计出去。
英文原文
@Belisapata Short term, they’re going to get designed out in future gens.
-
嘲讽Bernstein的$35目标价错误，机构唱空却在暗中做多，散户不应盲从机构预测。
我在1月份就说过Bernstein给$INTC定$35目标价简直是个小丑。他们只会乱给目标价。散户恐慌抛售正是他们的有意目的。而其他机构却在悄悄做多（从$SOI就能看出）。现在你读这些报告唯一的原因，就是从中寻找之前没有公开过的细微信息。然后自己推导市值预期。英特尔现在$100，在他们给$35目标价之后。机构不是你的朋友。
英文原文
I called out Bernstein for being a clown when they gave $INTC a $35 price target in Jan. They just slap dumb PTs. Retail panic sells as an intended consequence. While the other institutions silently go long (as seen with $SOI). Only reason you should read these anymore is for any nuances they drop that wasn’t public before. Then derive your own MC projection. Intel is now $100 after their $35 PT. Institutions are not your friends.
-
不看好控股公司相对 NAV 的定价
我不喜欢 SK Square。控股公司之所以会折价 NAV，是有原因的，因为没有什么好办法去逼它们把资产做套利。 这也正是 Grayscale 那类持仓和其他控股公司经常被折价的原因。
英文原文
Not a fan of SK Square. Holding companies trade under NAV for a reason since there's no good way to force an arbitrage on their assets. That's exactly why Grayscale holdings and others were traded under NAV of their crypto assets in the past. Better to just long Sk Hynix itself.
-
批评Coinbase获批后表态虚伪，指行业被出卖散户遭殃。
$COIN只有在他们获得附带条件的银行宪章批准之后才会说这种废话。 看到整个行业在本届政府手下被出卖，真的很可悲。 你们就享受那0.05%的活期存款利率吧，而传统银行却能赚取4%的利差，狠狠地薅每个美国散户的羊毛。 本来还以为我们终于能看到一些积极的改变。
英文原文
$COIN only says this crap after they got their conditional banking charter approved. Pretty sad to see the entire industry get sold out under this administration. Enjoy your .05% checking account interest while traditional banks profit a 4% spread shafting every day US retail. Had hopes we’d actually see some positive change.
-
认为 RDDT 在大盘软件社媒里最有吸引力
@Rumbourbon23 在更大市值的软件 / 社交媒体板块里，没有什么比 $RDDT 更有吸引力了。
英文原文
@Rumbourbon23 There's nothing more compelling in the larger cap software/social media bucket than $RDDT
-
指出SIVEF尚未被机构发现
$SIVEF目前还未被机构投资者发现。
英文原文
@SaxoDel95616 $SIVEF is undiscovered to institutions.
-
认为 Shunsin 也会三倍，但节奏更慢
@yuntungshieh 我也预计 Shunsin 会涨 3 倍，只是时间会慢一些。
英文原文
@yuntungshieh Shunsin I expect to 3x as well, just on a slower timeframe.
-
把 LPK 视作三倍潜力的第二梯队
@Jos1984482 如果非要给第 4 个名额，我会把 $LPK 放成三倍潜力的 runner up。
英文原文
@Jos1984482 $LPK is runner up for 3x potential if I had to give a 4th spot to a name.
-
认为 SOI 已经三倍，后面空间变小
@I_Am_Blacked 我的意思是 $SOI 真的已经涨了 3 倍……所以从这里再涨 3 倍就不太可能了。 也许未来一年再涨 100% 到 150% 还是合理的。
英文原文
@I_Am_Blacked I mean $SOI literally just went up 3x... So less likely to 3x from here. Maybe another 100%-150% over the next year seems plausible.
-
认为 AAOI 也许还能继续涨，但三倍速度会慢一些
@ExtensiveRsrch 我在 $AAOI 30 美元附近就点出来了，现在都快 160 了？ 它再像之前那样 3 倍会慢很多，但如果明年它变成美国最大 1.6T + laser fab 产能之一，也不是不可能。
英文原文
@ExtensiveRsrch I called out $AAOI at like $30 and it's like $160 now? Less likely to 3x as fast but next year it's possible if they become largest 1.6T + laser fab capacity in US.
-
解释$SIVEF因时区差异在收购后交易
时区差异。美国$SIVEF在太空收购事件发生后进行交易。
英文原文
@BDANDD Timezone difference. US $SIVEF traded after the space acquisition happened.
-
痛斥 SLNH 的高稀释
我很生气，因为有人在为了自己的私利，主动坑害散户投资者。 把人忽悠去买一只市值 2 亿美元的 $SLNH 股票，同时伴随 10 亿美元稀释和 5 亿美元的持续 ATM，这种行为简直令人作呕。 如果你在意股权增值，这种做法完全说不通。
英文原文
I get angry when people are actively trying to screw over retail investors for their own personal gain. Absolutely disgusting behavior leading people to buy a $200m MC stock in $SLNH with $1 BILLION DILUTION and a $500,000,000 ACTIVE ATM. Literally makes 0 sense if you care about equity appreciation.
-
IQE 与 SLNH 的融资性质不同
@KingDavidvs 你是在开玩笑吗？$IQE 有 $MTSI 帮它偿还 4500 万欧元债务，这在本质上完全不同。 而像 $SLNH 这种没名气的垃圾股，却会在 1.97 亿市值上稀释掉 10 亿美元，并且 5 亿美元的 ATM 只要散户一买就直接往公开市场砸。
英文原文
@KingDavidvs Are you kidding? $IQE having $MTSI to pay off debts with 45M Euros is fundamentally different. From some no name shtco like $SLNH diluting $1B off a $197m MC, with a $500M ATM sold into the open market whenever retail buys.
-
IREN 是很差的多头
$IREN 是个糟糕透顶的多头标的。我想不出有谁会真正关心组合净值增长，还愿意买进一个 60 亿美元 ATM、同时高管又给自己发创纪录高额 SBC 的公司。 人们只是因为“有稳定供电”的承诺才买进去，但这已经不算护城河了，那是去年的事了。
英文原文
$IREN is a horrendous long. I can’t imagine anyone that cares about portfolio appreciation to buy into a $6B ATM while executives award themselves record high SBC. People are just buying in to get diluted because of a promise of secured power (which is no longer a moat, it was last year)
-
小市值股背后是大额稀释
@saso_equity 哈哈，一只 1.94 亿美元市值的股票 -> 10 亿美元稀释，5 亿美元 ATM https://t.co/bvEAoX0hfv
英文原文
@saso_equity lol $194M MC stock -> $1B dilution, $500M ATM https://t.co/bvEAoX0hfv
-
SLNH 也是高稀释标的
$SLNH 跟 $BKKT、$ASST 和 $IREN 一样，都是垃圾股。 它正在通过 5 亿美元 ATM 积极稀释所有人。 真不明白为什么还有人听一个一再把散户组合搞崩的人说话。 我就看着他们从散户接盘侠手里融出 5 亿美元，最后把这些人稀释到 0。 然后再说“我们账上有 5 亿美元，所以市值应该更高”，再用这个 ATM 给自己发 SBC。 它们都绝对是很差的多头。
英文原文
$SLNH is a shtco like $BKKT, $ASST, and $IREN. That is actively diluting everyone with a $500M ATM. Not sure why anyone even listens to a guy who has consistently crashed retail portfolios over and over. I’m going to watch them raise $500M off retail bagholders that get diluted to $0. Then say “we have $500m on our balance sheets, MC should be higher” and award themselves SBC off the ATM. They’re all absolutely terrible longs.
-
SIVE 估值仍有上行空间
我认为在 $YSS + Golden Dome 和 Lightmatter 这些信息/新闻出来之后，$SIVE 今天现实中的估值大概应该在 30 亿美元左右。 纳斯达克上市不会从根本上改变它，但会给它更多流动性，用来弥合估值差。 明年冲到 100 亿美元非常有可能。 如果它们愿意通过下游 IP 收购来加速，我认为未来几年内它有一条现实路径去挑战 600 亿美元以上的 $LITE。
英文原文
I think $SIVE realistically should be valued around ~$3B today after information discovery/news around $YSS + Golden Dome and Lightmatter. NASDAQ listing doesn’t change it fundamentally, but gives it more liquidity to bridge that valuation gap. Next year $10B very possible on volume ramp. And I see a realistic path to competing with $60B+ $LITE over next few years if they want to speedrun it with downstream IP acquisitions.
-
祝贺持有 SIVE 的收益
@philllyfanatic 恭喜！最后其实都是你自己做的决定，我只是分享了我对 $SIVE 的思路。 希望那能在明年变成 100 万美元以上。
英文原文
@philllyfanatic Congrats! You made all the decisions yourself in the end, I just share my thought process on $SIVE. Hope that turns into $1M+ next year.
-
YSS 值得关注
@LNMDad 我现在没有持仓，但 $YSS 很有吸引力，因为我预计国防预算会继续向太空方向扩张。
英文原文
@LNMDad Don’t have open positions but $YSS is very compelling since I expect defense budgets to keep expanding into space
-
机构嘴上劝退，实际上在买
@ontrialperiod 我就喜欢这种情况：机构嘴上告诉散户别在 15 亿市值时买。 结果他们自己却一路买了 6.5% 的流通盘。
英文原文
@ontrialperiod I like how institutions tell retail not to buy at $1.5B MC. The they causally bought 6.5% of the float on the way up.
-
SIVE 仍被低估
@Berlinergy 我看到 $SIVE 到 2027 年会到 100 亿美元以上。 我不觉得大多数人或市场已经意识到它会映射到多少家超大规模云厂商供应商……而且他们也还没把 IP 收购带来的 TAM 扩张算进去。
英文原文
@Berlinergy I see $SIVE at $10B+ in 2027. Don’t think most people or markets realize how many hyperscaler suppliers they map to yet… also they didn’t factor in TAM expansion with IP acquisition yet either.
-
SOI 继续大涨
$SOI 这波已经很快拿到 +200% 的收益了。 如果你听我的，Soitec 今天又涨了 13.62%，对吗，匿名网友？ 我很喜欢这一点：当我最早提出这套 thesis 时，机构还告诉大家别在涨到 +30% 时买。 现在又翻了 2 倍…… 很多 X 账号之所以变火，就是因为大家不再相信“机构分析师评论”了，因为很多人其实是在和散户作对。
英文原文
Well that was a fast +200% gain with $SOI. Soitec up another 13.62% today if you listened anon? I love how when I first put out this thesis, institutions were telling people not to buy at +30%. Now it’s up another 2x… Reason a lot of X accounts get popular is people stopped trusting “institutional analyst commentary” since many work against retail.
-
先看财报再判断重估幅度
@lazarusinvests 我觉得温和的 80% 到 100% 重估是有可能的。我并不指望它会复利几百个百分点。 这只是我当前方向性的看法；我还需要等两周后的财报，才能建立更准确的估值模型。
英文原文
@lazarusinvests A modest 80%-100% re-rating seems possible to me. I don't expect this to compound hundreds of percent. This is just my directional thoughts, I'll need to see their earnings in two weeks to create a more accurate valuation model.
-
FORM 与 ONTO 都不差
@labubu_trader $FORM 或 $ONTO 都很难出错。整个生态现在都在飞速加速。
英文原文
@labubu_trader Hard to go wrong with $FORM or $ONTO. The whole ecosystem is just accelerating so fast right now.
-
AAOI 仍有上行空间
@bartlett_d26245 $AAOI 取决于财报。回到 60 美元时我就说它应该值 110 亿到 130 亿美元，现在终于达到我的预期了。 现在就看执行情况了，但如果他们真的做到成为美国最大的激光代工厂，并拥有 1.6T 产能，一年内轻松就能变成 300 亿美元以上的公司。
英文原文
@bartlett_d26245 $AAOI depends on the earnings. Back at $60 I said it should be valued at $11-$13B, and finally hit that projection. Depends on execution now, but if they deliver becoming largest laser fab + 1.6T capacity America, could easily be a $30B+ company in a year.
-
SIVE 仍处早期
@Cassian21828964 如果有什么的话，$SIVE 在 11 亿美元市值下其实非常早期，我认为它今天轻松就该值 20 亿美元以上。 它们站在 CPO / 1.6T 激光的前沿，映射到大量超大规模云厂商，而你现有的激光公司都已经是几百亿美元市值了。 我觉得它就是下一个 $LITE。
英文原文
@Cassian21828964 If anything $SIVE is extremely early at ~$1.1B and I think it should easily be $2B+ today. They’re the bleeding edge of CPO/1.6T lasers mapping to tons of hyperscalers while all your existing laser companies are in the tens of billions. I think it’s the next $LITE.
-
SIVE 刚过 10 亿市值
有个有意思的事实，$SIVE 刚刚突破 10 亿美元市值门槛。 所以现在已经有少数美国机构可以买了（基金章程限制） 但绝大多数机构在它登陆纳斯达克之前还是买不了。 顺带一提： 如果最后真的能服务 $JBL、$AMD、$AAPL、$AMZN、$MSFT 等超大规模云供应链，那么 10 亿美元市值对美国机构来说其实只是零钱。 你只要看看 $LWLG，靠一份测试协议都能做到 19 亿美元市值。
英文原文
Fun fact, $SIVE just crossed the $1B MC threshold. So a select few US institutions are able to buy it now (fund mandates) However, the vast vast majority still can’t until they get listed on NASDAQ. Just an FYI: $1B valuations are spare change for institutional investors in US hyperscaler supply chains if they end up powering $JBL, $AMD, $AAPL, $AMZN, $MSFT and others. Just look at $LWLG, $1.9B MC off 1 testing agreement with $TSEM.
-
ALRIB 仍在等待定价
关于 $ALRIB 没有新消息，我还是多头。 我只是让市场自己定价，不给目标位。 我倒是觉得，在 3 亿美元市值时，这家给 $MSFT 量子业务和其他量子点项目（比如 QD……以及硅光应用）供货的机器供应商，可能很快会吸引一些机构注意。我们拭目以待。
英文原文
There’s no new news with $ALRIB, I’m still long. I’m just letting markets price it in, not giving any targets. I do think at $300m MC, the machine supplier to $MSFT quantum, and other quantum dot programs like QD… and silicon photonic applications might get some institutional attention soon. We’ll see.