全部推文
共 6448 条 · 第 202 / 215 页 · 滚到底自动加载更多
-
建议不做IREN和WULF认股权证，看好CSP合作，IV高因预期交易。
@__visionxry__ 我可能不会做 $IREN 和 $WULF 的认股权证(CC)。另一方面，云服务提供商(CSP)对 IREN 来说是很好的。这些标的的隐含波动率(IV)极高是有原因的，因为人们预计交易随时会公布。
英文原文
@__visionxry__ I probably wouldn't do CC's on $IREN and $WULF. CSP's are great on the other hand for IREN. IV is extremely high for a reason on stuff because people are expecting a deal to come anytime.
-
博主凭记忆进行简单的数值估算。
@vicecarloans 凭记忆估算，130/30 = 4.3 * $124 ≈ $533 左右。
英文原文
@vicecarloans Off the top of my head, 130/30 = 4.3 * $124 = $533 ish.
-
讨论风险管理策略：交易者高抛低吸，长期投资者应坚定持有。
关于风险管理，很多人说当股票涨幅足够时，你应该减仓以收回本金，让剩余部分继续持有。然而，我认为如果你对该股票有信念，大多数人应该直接100%持有并让其复利增长。但话说回来，大多数人选择的股票都是错的。我个人如果感觉股价见顶，就会卖出100%或90%，然后在回调时重新买入。但我是交易者，如果你是长期投资者，就继续持有。
英文原文
For risk management, a lot of people say when a stock gains enough, you would trim enough to take out your principal and let the rest ride. However, I think most people should just hold 100% and let it compound if you have conviction in it. But then again, most people choose the wrong stocks. Personally I just sell 100% or like 90% if I feel like it topped, then rebuy on the dip. But I'm a trader, if you're long investing, just hold it.
-
博主调侃某分析师直播中断信号的行为。
@arny_trezzi 这让我想起那位在电视直播中假装切断信号的那位 Upstart 分析师。
英文原文
@arny_trezzi Reminds me of that one Upstart analyst who pretended to cut off on national TV
-
分享基于图表的波段交易策略，强调结合基本面与宏观分析的重要性。
我如何用图表进行波段交易，第二部分：短期（几周）+ 短中期（几个月）。 长期部分我会在另一篇帖子中讨论。 例1：$RKLB。仅凭直觉，在$40支撑位买入似乎是个好选择，$54卖出。通常下半部分（虚线）如$44也是不错的买入点，因为风险回报比良好，但你不会买到绝对底部。 你可以对像Rocketlab这样的股票这样做，因为长期来看，如果你持有足够久，即使它跌破$40，鉴于其基本面是强力买入（尽管目前略微高估），它很可能会恢复。 例2：$AMZN - 现在用正股买入是很好的选择。如果它跌破$210，你可以使用LEAPS（长期期权）。例如低于$200时，使用期限较短的看涨期权。 _ 了解基本面、宏观环境以及催化剂是否实质性影响也非常重要。如果未来收入大幅下降或行业利润率压缩，这些线条毫无意义。 很多时候它们因更非理性的因素下跌，例如GOOGL与苹果搜索之争，或者整体市场SPY下跌，但在这些情况下，如果没有实质性差异且公司持续增长，它们通常会再次上涨。再次强调，因人而异，在抄底时机上你需要分析图表以外的更多因素。这只是我所做工作的一部分。
英文原文
How I do swing trading with charts, Part 2: Short term (few week) + Short-Medium Term (few month). I'll do long term ones in another post. Ex 1: $RKLB. Just going off feels on this, seems like a great buy at $40 support, and $54 sell. Usually lower half (dotted line) like $44 is a good buy too cause risk-reward is good but u wont get the actual bottom. You can do it with stuff like Rocketlab since long term if you hold enough, even if it dips past $40 it will likely recover since it's a strong buy fundamentally albeit a tiny overvalued now. Example 2: $AMZN - Great buy with shares now. If it ever dips past $210, you can do leaps. Lower than $200 for example, shorter dated calls. _ Knowing fundamentals, macro, and whether catalysts are material or not is really also important. These lines mean nothing if forward revenue falls a lot or industry margins compresses. Lot of time they drop on more irrational things eg. GOOGL with Apple search, or maybe overall market SPY dipping but in those cases they usually rise up again if there's no difference + company keeps growing. Again different for everyone, you need to analyze more than the charts when timing bottoms. This is just part of what I do.
-
博主解释在谷歌交易及增资后建立CIFR头寸。
@philllyfanatic 是的，很明智。我仅在 $GOOGL 的交易达成以及资本增加之后，才建立了 $CIFR 的头寸。
英文原文
@philllyfanatic Yeah smart. I only built a position in $CIFR after the $GOOGL deal and capital rise too
-
认为ETOR今日大跌被低估，因其高现金储备及强劲增长。
@MakhmudovAkbar 是的，$ETOR 今天跌了 5% 确实是个好机会。真心不知道为什么跌这么多，毕竟他们持有约 33% 的现金，且增长速度堪比 $IBKR。
英文原文
@MakhmudovAkbar Yeah $ETOR is great on a 5% drop today. Genuinely don't know why it's down so much given they're like 33% cash and growing at $IBKR rates.
-
确认通用趋势形态推理属于正式的技术分析范畴。
@SquaredSircle 你说得对，我查了一下。我只是以为这种通用的趋势形态推理不属于正式的技术分析(Technical Analysis)，但看来确实属于。
英文原文
@SquaredSircle You're right, i looked it up. I just thought this general trend pattern reasoning wasn't a formal TA but guess it is.
-
博主承认标记错误并向网友致歉。
@BBizman62112 你说得对，我标记错误，抱歉。
英文原文
@BBizman62112 ur right my bad for mislabeling it
-
对比CRWV与CIFR/NBIS在Meta交易后的表现差异及估值逻辑。
$CRWV 在 Meta 交易后并没有像 $CIFR 和 $NBIS 那样大幅下跌。 CIFR 与 NBIS 相当可比，因为它们的融资价格均高于当前市值约 40% 以上，且债务较低并拥有超大规模云服务商（Hyperscaler）的交易。 这通常适用于同一行业且相对估值相似的公司。
英文原文
$CRWV didn't really drop after the Meta deal like $CIFR and $NBIS did though CIFR is pretty comparable to NBIS in the sense they raised ~40%+ above current values and low debt + hyperscaler deals This usually applies for companies in the same sector + similar relative valuations
-
博主因亲人离世感到悲伤，表示账户盈利无法抚慰心情。
@Neat_Lama @soulbiri1 @taleino93 谢谢，我最近失去了两位挚爱之人，看着投资组合价值上涨并不能让我感觉好受一些。
英文原文
@Neat_Lama @soulbiri1 @taleino93 Appreciate it, I lost two people I loved recently and seeing portfolios go up in value doesn't make me feel any better.
-
作者坦言无法全天候盯盘，强调心理健康重于金钱。
@mrazqkuki @JK6483 我也会利用隔夜盘/盘前交易时段。不幸的是，我也需要睡觉，所以无法24/7监控行情。心理健康比金钱更重要。
英文原文
@mrazqkuki @JK6483 I take advantage of overnight/pre-market too. Unfortunately, I fall asleep too so I can't monitor things 24/7. Mental health is more important than money.
-
博主解释画图动机并提及将分享图表分析要点。
@number1invest_ 谢谢。我这样画图是为了掩饰我的抑郁情绪。 但人们看到我在拿 $BMNR 的技术分析(TA) 开玩笑，其实我只是想分享几点我通常如何看待图表和趋势的要点。 还有更多内容值得指出，但我稍后再做，现在感觉不太舒服。
英文原文
@number1invest_ Thanks. I draw them this way to mask my depression. But people see me make fun of TA's on $BMNR but I just wanted to give a few pointers on how I usually look at charts + trends. There's more things to point out but I'll do it later, not feeling the best right now
-
通过对比NBIS与CIFR走势，论证基本面改变后图表模式对股价预测的有效性。
我常调侃图表分析，但有时它对基于模式的推理（非技术分析 TA）确实有帮助。 历史不会重演，但相似行业的公司往往押韵。 当基本面发生重大变化时： 例如 $NBIS（64->100->86）与 $CIFR（+32% -> -18% -> 上涨）在 $170亿 MSFT 交易和 GOOGL 30亿交易后的表现。 我们可能会看到 CIFR 在回调后像 NBIS 一样上涨。 它遵循了相同的模式：先上涨 32%，然后下跌 18%，现在它开始像 NBIS 一样攀升。 同样的逻辑也适用于财报后的 AVGO（先回调，然后大幅反弹）和现在的 ORCL（财报亮眼，回调，然后大幅反弹），因为基本面发生了改变。 我想把一些 Reddit 风格的图表分析带到 X 上，但在我看来，这是图表分析真正有用的一次。
英文原文
I make fun of charting but sometimes it's genuinely helpful for pattern based reasoning (not TA). History doesn't repeat itself but it often rhymes for companies in similar sectors. With things material to fundamentals: Eg. $NBIS (64->100->86) vs. $CIFR (+32% into -18% into rise) post $17B MSFT deal and GOOGL 3B deal. We'll likely see CIFR increase like NBIS after the dip. It followed the same pattern where it rose 32%, then dropped 18%, and now it's beginning it's ascent similar to NBIS. Same thing can be said about AVGO post earnings (then dip, then massive rally) and ORCL now (great earnings, dip, then massive rally), because fundamentals changed. Thought I'd bring some Reddit style charting to X but this is one of the times generally when charting helps imo.
-
HIMS 面临政府竞争，但用户粘性强且空头回补预期支撑股价。
是的，我在 $HIMS 60 美元左右减仓了，但政府与其竞争这一因素相当重大。同时我认为其用户粘性高，且下半年有 Zava 收购带来的顺风效应，加上 33% 的做空比例。因此我预计股价将在此区间徘徊，甚至可能因空头回补而上涨。它并非极度低估或高估，但目前有更好的多头标的。
英文原文
Yeah I trimmed $HIMS around $60, but this is pretty material with the government competing with it. At the same time I'd aruge the audience is sticky + they have Zava acqusition tailwind second half + 33% short interest. So I'd just expect the price to hover around these levels or maybe even increase while shorts use this time to cover. It's not extremely undervalued or overvalued but there's better longs at the moment.
-
博主祝贺用户soulbiri1。
@soulbiri1 恭喜！
英文原文
@soulbiri1 Congrats!
-
对某事持观望态度，等待市场开盘或明日结果。
@JK6483 不知道，我们看看开盘时或明天的情况。
英文原文
@JK6483 dunno, we'll see when market opens or tomorrow
-
美政府停摆确认，机构已知晓，建议散户利用恐慌建立多头。
美国政府停摆已确认。正如我几小时前所料，Polymarket 几乎以 100% 的概率定价了停摆。机构和交易者早已知晓，但散户看到新闻后会恐慌。利用这个黄金机会建立多头头寸。
英文原文
US government shutdown confirmed. As I expected a few hours ago, Polymarket was pricing in almost 100% confirmation of a shutdown. Institutions and traders already know about it but retail will panic on the news. Use this golden opportunity to build long positions. https://t.co/HCkIqwCtnd
-
解释近期市场反弹源于降息预期及减税利好。
@brewmarkets 因为就在4-5个月前我们刚经历了一次重大股市崩盘，且9月中旬进行了降息。$SPY 因减税政策涨至700点以上，预计还将迎来三次降息。
英文原文
@brewmarkets Because we just had a major stock crash just 4-5 months before and rate cut mid-September. SPY 700+ from tax cuts, 3x rate cuts incoming.
-
LTC和BTC看涨，LTC因ETF和新公司有2-3倍潜力。
不太确定你具体问什么，但 LTC 和 BTC 都看涨。Tether 正在印钞购买比特币，BTC 从 12.4 万美元跌至 11.4 万美元是合理的。黄金创历史新高也有帮助。我认为我关于 LTC 的帖子是说，LTC 在 80 亿美元市值下，加上 ETF 决定和新成立的国库公司，有 2-3 倍的潜力。
英文原文
not sure about your question exactly, but ltc + btc are both bullish. Tether is printing money to buy Bitcoin now, BTC dropped from $124k to $114k which is reasonable. Gold ATH helps too. i think my post about LTC was saying LTC at a little 8b marketcap with ETF decision + new treasury companies have a lot more potential to 2-3x.
-
RKLB具国家安全战略价值，因发射成功可能暴涨故不卖看涨期权。
@Neat_Lama 最大的催化剂是中程有效载荷的“中子”(Neutron)火箭。对于 $RKLB，我确实不太关心宏观经济，因为我坚信它对国家安全的重要性就像 $TSM 对台湾一样重要，加上太空领域 = 规模巨大。这就是为什么我不对 RKLB 卖出看涨期权(CC)，因为成功的发射新闻可能会让它上涨50% lol。
英文原文
@Neat_Lama biggest catalyst is medium lift payload neutron. don't really care about macro with $RKLB since I believe it's important to national security like $TSM is to Taiwan + Space = grow big. that's why i dont sell CC's on RKLB cause successful launch news could bring it up 50% lol.
-
复盘RKLB和HOOD过早卖出，错失后续大幅上涨。
我曾在$15时持有约$600k的$RKLB，在$25时卖出，随后在$22至$30之间反复操作，但在$30多美元中期过早卖出，现在股价已达$47，这还不算太糟。此外，我在关税下跌时在$30持有$300k以上的$HOOD多头头寸，但在恢复至$38左右时卖出，否则现在本可获利数百万。
英文原文
Same I had like $600k of $RKLB at $15 sold at $25, kept flipping it between $22 and $30, sold it too early mid 30's and now it's $47, which isn't that bad. Also had $300k+ of $HOOD longs at $30 on the tariff dip, but sold on recovery at like $38, would have been a few million by now
-
受邀在旧金山科技周演讲，旨在帮助散户投资者。
@JK6483 谢谢，我实际上受邀在一周后的旧金山科技周(SF Tech Week)上发表演讲，主题是我在这里常发的内容。所以，如果银行高管觉得有帮助，可能对散户也有帮助！我只是想帮助小鱼们。
英文原文
@JK6483 Thx, I actually got invited to give a speech at SF tech-week in a week about the usual stuff I post here. So if people think it's helpful to executives from banks, might be helpful to retail too! I'm just trying to help the little fish out.
-
博主回应感谢，表示乐意继续在X平台分享内容。
@JK6483 谢谢！现在大多数人都在 Reddit 上认识我，因为我是通过在那里发布叠加在股票上的梗图动漫画而成名的，但我对 X 平台仍然很新。 非常感激大家的鼓励，如果人们觉得我的帖子有帮助，我很乐意继续在这里发帖。
英文原文
@JK6483 Thanks! Most people me on Reddit by now since that's where I made my name posting meme Anime drawings on top of stocks, but still very new to X. Super grateful for the words of encouragement and I'm happy continuing to post here if people find it helpful.
-
分享期权定投策略、打破IV规则及税务考量。
谢谢，是的，风险承受能力确实很重要。另外我也不完美，偶尔也会看错，但我觉得总体上我的准确率还不错。 忘了再补充一点关于仓位管理的事。你可以用看涨期权进行定投(DCA)，但这风险大得多。我个人会这么做，如果某只股票被严重低估，我会打破隐含波动率(IV)<32%的规则。 等股价再次上涨后，你可以换回正股，而不是仅仅持有看涨期权，然后重复此操作以改善你的平均成本。 但所有这些操作都会触发短期资本利得税，所以并不适合所有人。
英文原文
Thanks, yeah risk tolerance is really important. Also I'm not perfect so I do get some wrong from time to time, but I do think generally I'm decently accurate. Forgot to add one more thing about position sizing too. You can DCA with calls but it's a lot more risky. I personally do this and break the <32% IV rule if something is really undervalued. And after it rises again, you can switch back to shares instead of just holding the calls + repeat to improve your cost average. But all of this triggers short term capital gains tax so not for everyone.
-
建议普通投资者长期持有高确信度股票并卖出备兑看涨期权。
@NoahIAvest 这是给日内交易者/波段交易者+期权卖方用于底部/顶部择时的。如果你是普通投资者，只需像持有 $IREN $CIFR 那样持有你高确信度的股票1年，并学习如何卖出备兑看涨期权(Covered Call)。例如 @DeepValueBagger。
英文原文
@NoahIAvest This is for day trader/swing traders + option sellers for bottom/top timing. If you're just a regular investor, just hold your high conviction stocks for 1y like $IREN $CIFR if those are your two, and learn to write cc on them. eg. @DeepValueBagger https://t.co/rQm3UPyeP2
-
卖出CRWV获利，看好IREN/NBIS算力需求，拟重估CRWV长期价值。
我昨天以 $CRWV $122.5 买入，今天以 $138.1 卖出。纯粹是时机运气好。我还没来得及深入分析 META 的合同，但鉴于 META 和其他超大规模云服务商(hyperscalers)目前急需算力，这对 $IREN 和 $NBIS 来说是非常看涨的。虽然我卖出了，但我吃完沙拉后可能会花一两个小时研究一下合同和估值。个人而言，我一直更喜欢其他新云(neoclouds)公司而非 CRWV，主要是因为债务利息问题，但也许 META 的合同会让我重新考虑将其作为长期持有标的，我需要进一步研究。
英文原文
I had $CRWV yesterday $122.5, and sold it $138.1 today. Just got lucky with timing. I didn't have enough time to do a deep dive into the META contract yet, but just because META and other hyperscalers are looking for compute now this is insanely bullish for $IREN $NBIS. I did sell but I'll probably spend an hour or two to look into the contract + valuation after I eat some salad. Personally I've always liked the other neoclouds more than crwv just cause of debt interest, but maybe the meta contracts would make me reconsider this as a long, ill need to look into it more
-
建议对长期持仓进行正向定投，若估值未反映营收潜力则继续持有加仓。
@taleino93 补充一点，对于长期持有(long term holds)的标的，你应该进行正向定投(cost average up)。如果基本面利好显著，比如 $CRWV 之于 Meta 或 $NBIS 之于 MSFT，只要你认为上涨行情尚未完全反映未来的营收潜力，就继续持有并在回调时加仓。
英文原文
@taleino93 Adding on to this, for long term holds, you should cost average up. If it's materially positive like Meta for $CRWV or MSFT of $NBIS, just hold it and buy more if you think forward rev potential is not priced in from a rally.
-
强调仓位管理重要性，举例说明分批建仓与波段操作策略。
谢谢！忘了在上面补充一点：投资组合配置极其重要，以防你时机把握不准或发生意外，从而能进行成本平均。例如，如果你有10万美元的投资组合，其中3万美元现金。$NBIS 从117美元跌至112美元时，你可以投入1.5万美元。如果从112美元跌至105美元，再投入1.5万美元。如果从105美元跌至95美元，你可以将那3万美元转为看涨期权。如果你仅持有股票且风险承受能力较低（例如25%的仓位分配），就不应该想“我应该全仓买入，因为它涨了3%”。你投资组合中25%的部分获得3%的利润已经很不错了。显然这只是例子，针对像NBIS这样高确信度的标的，我对$PATH 不太了解。对于像$CRWV 这样的标的，我昨天在跌至120美元时买入，然后在139-140美元左右卖出，并可能等待另一个入场点，同时持有其他新云厂商如NBIS。
英文原文
Thanks! Forgot to add above that portfolio positioning is extremely important just in case you get timing wrong + something unexpected happens so you can cost average. So if you have $100 portfolio for example, $30k cash. $NBIS drops $117-> $112, you can do like $15k at that level. If it drops $112 -> $105, do another $15k. If it drop $105 -> $95, you can switch that $30k to calls. If you're doing only shares with less risk tolerance eg. 25% allocation, you shouldn't think "i should have full ported it went up 3%". 3% profit off 25% of your portfolio is already good. Obviously just examples, from something higher conviction like NBIS, I don't really know about $PATH. For something like $CRWV I actually bought yesterday on some drop to $120 then sold $139-140ish, and will likely wait for another entry point while I hold other neoclouds like NBIS.
-
博主分享6只个股的短期交易策略，强调经验直觉胜过耐心口号。
最近 X 上流传着很多鼓舞人心的交易者心态，比如： “会有回报的。要有耐心。”全是废话。 交易者会考虑板块动量、催化剂、估值、回调、宏观、隐含波动率(IV)、期权流向等。 以下是我对各种股票短期交易的心态： 1. $NBIS - $111.91，尽管当天上涨了 1.53%，但由于 Meta 给予其 140 亿美元合同，CRWV 上涨了 12%。 这通常对所有新云厂商都是利好。它曾飙升至 $117（我可能仍会持有），但随后回落至 $111，可能是由于未平仓合约过多，但我们可能会继续看到上涨行情。因此我会利用这段时间进行定投(DCA)并买入看涨期权/股票，即使它已经上涨了 1.53%。 这不是“真正的下跌”，更像是上涨过程中的回调。 2. $HIMS - $56.4 下跌 4.67%，通常人们只是盲目抄底，但这实际上是由重大因素引起的，即特朗普推出了面向消费者的政府药品网站。随着股价升至 $60，空头比率降至 33%。 这次下跌可能会被用于空头回补。我在 $46 支撑位买入，但在反弹后不久卖出，因为我感觉它还会进一步下跌。但我个人更喜欢底部入场点，所以可能更接近 $50。 我记得 AMZN 推出竞争对手时，HIMS 暴跌 20% 然后再次上涨，我预计特朗普的计划中期也会如此，但近期它是一个逆风因素。 3. $RDDT - $228，下跌 5.45%，没有新闻。可能只是估值担忧。我们看到类似的增长股如 ALAB、CRED 有随机的 20% 回调。许多软件/社交股票如 SNAP 因非重大新闻下跌 8.1%。修正很健康，股票不会一直上涨，我个人更倾向于等待再次回到 $100+，而不是 $200+，但鉴于 RDDT 在随机日子有更大的 5-8% 回调，根据历史经验，6-7% 的下跌是日内的好买点，你可能会看到它恢复，但我们可能会看到许多增长股在 11/12 月的大涨前经历更大的修正，所以可能不是真正的底部。 我现在不看图表 RSI，只是基于过去一两年每天观察股票 + IV 的经验感觉来做。 4. AMZN - 没有重大宏观新闻，可能是 10 月 1 日的政府停摆可能会引起指数恐慌，但这没什么大不了的。它下跌了 1.35%，所以我会买入，因为这是摊低成本的好时机。 5. Klarna - $36，下跌 5.3%。有时你只是凭直觉行事。低于 IPO 价格，没有重大新闻。大多数 IPO 都下跌了，比如 Gemini 等。如果你想建立长期头寸，我会在这个水平买入。 6. TSM - $277，我有罪地进行了 $273-$279 之间的波段交易，所以我每次跌至 $273 就买入，在 $277-$279 卖出以获取 2% 的纯股票利润。到目前为止，我用股票做了大约 2 次。如果跌破 $273，我就定投，如果进一步下跌就切换到看涨期权。 没有绝对的对错方式，每个人都有自己的方法。（另外抱歉 CRM，糟糕的财报搞错了那个，如果进一步下跌我可能会摊平成本）。 但一般来说，这只是我浏览每只股票清单时的想法。再次强调，每个人想法不同，我只是想写下我的思考过程，如果对他有帮助的话。
英文原文
Lot of inspirational trader mindsets going around X lately like: "It will pay off. Be Patient". All BS. Traders consider sector momentum, catalysts, valuation, pullbacks, macro, IV, option flows, etc. Here's my mindset for short term trading for various stocks: 1. $NBIS - $111.91, even though it's up 1.53% on the day, CRWV is up 12% off Meta gives them a $14B contract. So usually it's bullish for all neoclouds. It spiked to $117 ( i probably would have still held) but pulled back to $111 likely from too much open interest, but we'll likely keep seeing a rally upward. So I'd use this time to DCA and buy calls/shares even if it's up 1.53% Not "truly a dip" but it's more of a dip during a rally. 2. $HIMS - $56.4 Down 4.67%, usually people just blindly buy the dip but this was actually caused from something material, which was Trump launching a direct to consumer GOV drug website. Short interest decreased back to 33% on the rise to $60. This dip will likely be used for short covering. I did buy $46 support but sold shortly on a bounce after I just felt like it would go down more. But I just personally prefer bottom entry points so that's probably closer to $50. I still remember AMZN launching a competitor, HIMS crashed 20% then rose again, I'd expect the same with Trump's program mid term but near term it's a headwind. 3. $RDDT - $228, down 5.45%, no news. Just probably valuation concerns. We saw similar growth stocks like ALAB, CRED, have random 20% pullbacks. Lot of software/social stocks like SNAP down 8.1% off non-material news. Correction is healthy, stocks don't just keep going up, I'd prefer to wait in the $100+ again, rather than $200+ (just personally), but it's actually a better buy than the rest, given RDDT has larger 5-8% pullbacks on random days, just from historical experiences so 6-7% drop is a good buy intra-day and you'd likely see it recover but we might see a lot of growth stocks have a larger correction into massive rally Nov/Dec so might not be an actual bottom. I don't really look at chart RSI nowadays, just do this based on feelings from experience looking at the stock + IV every day for the past year or two. 4. AMZN - No major macro news, prob government shutdown Oct 1st that might cause some panic for index but it's pretty immaterial. It dropped, 1.35% so I'd buy since it' a good time to cost average. 5. Klarna - $36, 5.3% drop. Sometimes you just go off gut feeling. Below IPO price, no major news. Most IPOs were down like Gemini, etc. If you wanted to build a long term position I'd buy at this level. 6. TSM - $277, I've been guilty of swing trading between $273-$279, so I just buy every drop to $273 and sell at $277-$279 for 2% profit purely with shares. So far I've done this ~2 times with shares. If it drops past $273, I'd just DCA and then if it drops further switch to calls. There's no True or False way to do this, everyone kind of has their own approach. (also sorry about CRM, bad earnings got that one wrong, I'll probably cost avg if ti declines further). But generally this is just what I'm thinking about when I go down the list of every single stock. Once again, everyone thinks differently, I just wanted to write down how I think if it's helpful to others.