个股论点
围绕单一股票的投资逻辑与仓位表态 · 共 2504 条 · 滚到底自动加载更多
-
作者看好$VPG为人形机器人拐点标的，类比$SNDK/$SMCI早期，已建仓。
看来市场开始关注 $VPG 了。 这是我机器人板块的首选股。 它让我想起当前内存行情启动前 $30 的 $SNDK，最终涨至 $470。 或者 AI 建设行情启动前 $1.3 的 $SMCI，最终涨至 $100。 这可能是人形机器人行业的拐点。 https://t.co/POgwnIJyu8
英文原文
Looks like markets are starting to find out about $VPG. This is my top robotics sector stock. And reminds me of $SNDK at $30 before current memory rally to $470. Or $SMCI at $1.3 before the AI buildout rally to $100. This may be the inflection point for robotics humanoids. https://t.co/POgwnIJyu8
-
AXTI波动属正常现象，常现30%随机涨跌。
@taKong2024 没什么特别的，$AXTI 只是正常的波动性，因为它经常出现随机的30%涨跌幅。
英文原文
@taKong2024 Nothing, it’s just normal volatility with $AXTI since it has random 30% movements
-
看好Intel受白宫政策补贴及巨头背书，具高非对称性回报潜力。
永远不要做空白宫。 $INTC 可能是半导体领域目前最具非对称性（asymmetrical）的多头机会之一。https://t.co/ow1BO48XO4 （该推文引用了 @aleabitoreddit 的推文，引用内容仅供理解语境）： $INTC 基本上就是半导体界的 $RKLB 之于 SpaceX，是我最大的持仓之一。 众所周知，随着 Nvidia 到 Apple 等巨头背书，它终将赶上 $TSM，成为美国政府事实上的半导体臂膀。 这只是时间问题。 在 $2340 亿市值（$TSM 为 $1.5 万亿）下，仅凭等待就有约 7 倍回报。 无论是 2 年还是 10 年，我坚信 Intel 是市场中罕见的机会，你可以投资白宫以及无限印钞机补贴的烧钱晶圆厂（foundry）开发。 这不是赢家通吃，半导体 TAM（总可寻址市场）将持续增长，$TSM 是很好的多头，但当 Intel 产能可用时，从 Google 到 Nvidia 的美国超大规模云服务商（hyperscalers）将迫于压力使用 Intel。 美国不会让 Intel 失败，这是基于美国政策的高确信度（high conviction）多头。
英文原文
Never bet against the White House. $INTC is probably one of the most asymmetrical longs in the semi space right now. https://t.co/ow1BO48XO4
-
警告有毒融资结构，ATM增发稀释散户价值。
这就是自动再融资(ATM)的运作方式。股价下跌是因为散户投资者意识到，这家公司刚刚通过向散户发行相当于市值65%的股票来出售，导致他们的持仓价值被稀释殆尽，从而提前反应了这3亿美元(ATM)的发行。甚至去年董事会还投票决定增发并出售24%的流通盘作为“奖金”。这仅仅是对散户而言有毒的融资结构的警告。
英文原文
This is how ATMs work. The drop was anticipation of the $300m ATM from retail investors realizing that their value got wiped out from the company that just printed 65% of the marketcap to sell on them. Even last year board voted for 24% of float to be printed -> sold as a bonus. This is just a warning about the toxic financing structure for retail.
-
澄清BKKT跌幅时区差异，指出散户面临新股增发抛压。
是的，你说得对，$BKKT 较昨日下跌了 25%，这反映了 $HOOD 的时区差异。话虽如此，但这并不改变帖子的核心观点。人们可以自由行事，这里只是提供他们历史行为的信息。散户可以自由买入刚刚增发并将在公开市场抛售的 3 亿美元新股。这种事年年都在发生。
英文原文
Yes you’re right $BKKT is down 25% from yesterday, this is timezone difference which $HOOD is reflecting. That being said nothing about point of the post changes. People are free to do whatever they want, this is just information about their history. Retail are free to buy into $300m of new shares that just got printed + will be sold onto the open market. This happens year after year.
-
解释股价因大额ATM增发稀释而机械性下跌。
这里有很多误解，但我还是会回复。股价下跌是因为有一笔3亿美元的可转债(ATM)发行。这是一个有趣的教训：如果你发行的新股超过现有市值的65%以上，并在公开市场上向现有的散户套牢者出售价值3亿美元的新股，股价在机械上就会下跌。
英文原文
There’s a lot of delusion here but I’ll reply. It’s down because there’s a $300 million ATM. Here’s a fun lesson, if you print more than 65%+ of an existing marketcap and sell $300m worth of new stock on the open market on existing retail bagholders, the stock mechanically drops.
-
批评$BKKT相关人士删帖行为，质疑其留在$IREN董事会的合理性。
这家伙在$BKKT股价因基于虚假信息的无休止吹嘘而暴跌后，删除了他所有的帖子。 我完全不明白@danroberts0101为什么还让他留在$IREN的董事会，这看起来太糟糕了。 信息发现和吹嘘是有区别的。 声称听到内部人士谈论无法应对的过度需求等无法验证的言论 -> 股价上涨。然后在FOMO（错失恐惧症）后股价暴跌时删除帖子，这简直大错特错。
英文原文
The guy deleted all his posts after $BKKT stock crashed after the incessant shill from made up information. I have zero clue why @danroberts0101 keeps him on $IREN’s board since it’s a terrible look. There’s a difference between information discovery and shilling. Saying made up unverifiable statements about hearing insider talk about too much demand they can’t keep up -> stock rallies. Then deleting the posts after it crashes post fomo is just so wrong.
-
BKKT因ATM增发暴跌，警示散户警惕有毒融资结构。
$BKKT 盘前下跌 -23.87%，原因是新一轮 $300M 的自动取款机(ATM)增发稀释。在我看来，这是整个市场中表现最糟糕的公司之一。我为那些在 $45 时跟随某位网红(influencer)买入的散户感到难过，因为他们的投资组合现在已亏损超过 64%。这是一个无尽的循环：新闻引发的错失恐惧(FOMO) -> ATM/大规模稀释，这只会伤害散户。以下是 $BKKT 试图不断掩盖的历史：2024年2月：通过注册直接发行(registered direct offering)发行约 140 万股 + 认股权证。2025年7月：在股价约 $24 时，通过 $75M 的公开发行又发行约 675 万股 + 预融资认股权证(pre-funded warrants)，但以约 $10（60%+折扣）的价格卖给机构。9月：Mike Alfred 加入 -> 他开始每天发布关于该股的帖子。管理层在股价上涨后试图向高管发行 24% 的稀释性奖励以进行套现。今天：当市值仅为 $500m 时，$300 Million 的 ATM 被倾倒在公开市场上，由散户接盘。$BKKT 是我见过的最大的散户资本毁灭公司之一。股票本应是人人受益的正和博弈，但这看起来只是从散户口袋到高管的价值转移。网红推广后 -> ATM 或高管授予稀释。我没有任何持仓，但作为旁观者：这是为什么你应该对融资结构完全有毒的公司进行独立研究(Do Your Own Research)的完美例子。
英文原文
$BKKT is down -23.87% premarket after a new $300M ATM dilution. In my opinion, this is one of the worst companies in the entire market. I feel sorry for people who followed a certain influencer at $45 since retail portfolios are now wiped over 64%. There’s an endless cycle of news fomo -> ATM/massive dilution that only harms retail. This is the history $BKKT endlessly tries to hide: Feb 2024: Issued ~1.4M shares + warrants in a registered direct offering. Jul 2025: Issued another ~6.75M shares + pre-funded warrants in a $75M public offering, when the stock was trading around $24, but sold them to institutions at ~$10 (60%+ discount). September: Mike Alfred joins -> he starts posting about the stock every day. Management after rally tries to issue 24% dilution awards to executives to sell Today: $300 Million ATM dumped in the public market on retail, when MC is only $500m $BKKT so far is of the biggest retail capital destruction companies I’ve seen. Stocks are a positive sum game where everyone benefits, but this just looks like a value transfer from retail pockets to executives. After influencer promotion -> ATM or executive grant dilution I have zero positions but as a spectator: This is the perfect example of why you should do your own research into companies that have completely toxic financing structures
-
看好$VPG作为特斯拉机器人供应链中的优质利基标的。
@leavego8102 很高兴你现在知道了 $VPG！在特斯拉 Optimus 概念股中，它是西方机器人供应链中真正优质的利基(niche)标的。大家都专注于 AI，而太空、机器人、无人机供应链方面大家关注还不多，所以我认为这里才是真正的机会。
英文原文
@leavego8102 $VPG 를 이제라도 알게 되셔서 다행이네요! 테슬라 옵티머스 수혜주 중 서구 로봇 공급망 쪽에서는 정말 알짜배기 니치 종목이거든요. 다들 AI에만 몰두하느라 우주나 로봇, 드론 공급망 쪽은 아직 많이들 안 보는데, 그래서 저는 여기가 진짜 기회라고 생각해요
-
看好$VPG作为人形机器人核心供应商，具高BOM占比与非对称收益潜力。
$VPG 是最不为人知的机器人供应链股票之一。 然而，它可能是对机器人人形机器人量产（Humanoid ramp）最具非对称性敞口的标的，尤其是针对： - $TSLA Optimus ~ Figure AI 因为这家市值 5.8 亿美元的公司： - 估计占每个人形机器人物料清单（BOM）成本的 3-9%。 如果埃隆·马斯克在 2027 年实现德州超级工厂年产 1000 万台的目标，仅来自 $TSLA 的收入可能每年达到 85 亿美元（850 美元中位数 * 1000 万台）。 这是基于 $VPG CEO 关于每机器人价值捕获 500-1200 美元（850 美元中位数）的言论，以及埃隆雄心勃勃的产量预测。 再次强调，这种算法极具投机性，但埃隆称规模化后每人形机器人成本为 2-3 万美元，你可以推导出 $VPG 从每台特斯拉机器人中估计获得 ~3%-9%+ 的 BOM 份额（如果这真的发生）。 如果你考虑到埃隆·马斯克说“特斯拉最终 80% 的价值可能来自 Optimus 机器人”：对于这家在机器人供应链中至关重要的小公司来说，这看起来是机器人量产的极佳敞口。 我认为市场还忽略了一点，即未将低端企业利润率纳入混合利润率估算：~40%。 然而，规模化的人形机器人特定毛利率预计为 50% 至 55%（随着当前机器人量产，混合利润率可能会显著增加）。 他们的集成执行器/传感器模块（传感器 + 外壳 + 电子元件）很可能直接与人形机器人敞口挂钩（包含这些复杂组件的测量系统部门），CEO 在财报电话会议上表示该部门利润率约为“55% 左右”。 在埃隆于 2028 年实现 1000 万人形机器人预测的牛市情景下（单一客户，不包括 Figure、OpenAI 或其他潜在客户） 55% 利润率对应 85 亿美元收入： - 20 倍市盈率（P/E）将是 476 亿美元 - 30 倍市盈率 833 亿美元 从 5.8 亿美元市值起步。 听起来很荒谬，但当我看到 $SMCI 在服务器机架拉升前（$3 -> $113）或 $SNDK 的拉升（$30 -> $453）时，这看起来是可能的。 再次强调，这是投机性的最佳可能情景，但经营杠杆（Operating Leverage）才是真正的主线故事。 所以我认为，如果机器人量产条件成熟，这家 5.8 亿美元的小公司很可能被强烈重估。 现在看下行风险： - 另一个主要的人形机器人提供商可能是 Figure，因为时间线匹配。但这尚未确认。（不认领时间线映射研究的功劳，那是其他分析师做的）。这些数字是基于 Citron 等第三方估计的假设模型，如果有竞争对手，毛利率可能会压缩，或者收入增长可能无法实现。 - $TSLA 可能自 2022 年起就在使用 $VPG 并开始扩大规模。始终存在他们内部掌握专利技术/材料并抛弃客户的风险。这种牛市情景与特斯拉 Optimus 量产挂钩，始终存在被抛弃的风险，市场可能会对此定价。 - 再次强调，这是一个人形机器人规模化博弈。如果埃隆的预测过于雄心勃勃并面临延迟，这可能会像 2025 年一样停滞（尽管 2025 年仍有 ~85% 的回报）。 但 TLDR（太长不看）： 我的观点是，像 Citron 这样的机构分析师太早了。 然而，鉴于 OpenAI 上周进军机器人领域： 我认为 2026 年是机器人的拐点，$VPG 很可能捕获对特斯拉和人形机器人量产的最佳敞口。 尤其是当一家小公司可能占据每个部署机器人高比例的 BOM 成本和高毛利率时： 我已经建立多头头寸，看看这会走向何方。当然请自行研究（DYOR），我只是想分享我是如何建立这个多头信念的。
英文原文
$VPG is one of the least known robotic supply chain stocks. However, it's likely the single best asymmetrical exposure to robotics Humanoid ramp for - $TSLA Optimus ~ Figure AI as this $580m company makes: est. ~3-9% BOM cost of every humanoid. $8.5B revenue may come from $TSLA alone ($850 midpoint * 10M) every year if Elon hits his 10M Giga Texas production target in 2027. This is based on $VPG CEO's quote on value capture of $500–$1,200 per robot ($850 midpoint) and Elon's ambitious projections on production targets. Again this math is extremely speculative, but Elon quotes $20-30k/humanoid at scale and you can derive an est. ~3%-9%+ of BOM from each Tesla Robot produced (if this does ever happen) for $VPG. If you consider Elon Musk saying "About 80% of Tesla's Value Could Eventually Come From Optimus Robots": This looks like great exposure for robotics ramp for such a small company that's critical in the robotics supply chain. What I believe markets also missed is factoring in low end corporate margins to for blended margin estimates: ~40% However, the humanoid-specific gross margin at scale is projected to be 50% to 55% (and with current robotics ramp, blended margins would likely increase significantly). Their integrated actuator/sensor Modules (sensor + housing + electronics) is likely directly tethered to humanoid exposure, (measurement systems segment which houses these complex assemblies), which the CEO said on their earnings call achieves margins of "55% or so". In a bull case scenario where Elon hits his 10M humanoid projections in 2028 (single customer, not including Figure, OpenAI, or other potential customers) 55% margin off $8.5B revenue at : - 20x P/E would be $47.6 Billion -30x P/E $83.3 Billion from $580m MC. It sounds stupid, but when I look at $SMCI pre-server rack rally ($3 -> $113) or $SNDK's rally ($30 -> $453), it looks possible. Again this is speculative best case possible scenario, but the operating leverage is the real story here. So I think it's likely for this small $580m company to be strongly re-rated if the stars align for robotics ramp. Now downside risk: - The other humanoid provider is likely to be Figure due to timeline mapping. But this is not confirmed. (not taking credit for either mapping research, they were done by other analysts). These figures are hypothetical modeling based on third-party estimates like Citron, gross margins might be compressed if there's competitors or revenue ramp might not play out. - $TSLA has likely been using $VPG since 2022 and is starting to ramp up. There is always a risk they figure out the patented technology/materials in-house and drop a customer. This bull-case scenario is tethered to Tesla Optimus ramp and there's always a risk they get dropped that markets might price in. - Again this is a humanoid scale play. If Elon's projections are too ambitious and face delays, this might be stagnant like 2025 (which was still ~85% return). But TLDR: My opinion was that institutional analysts like Citron were way too early. However, given OpenAI's push into robotics last week: I believe 2026 to be the inflection point for robotics and $VPG likely captures the best exposure to Tesla and Humanoid robotics ramp. Especially when a small company likely has high % BOM cost of each robot deployed and high gross margins: I've taken long positions to see where this ends up. Of course DYOR on this, I just wanted to share how I came to develop my own conviction on this long.
-
赞同关于$VPG的论点，看好机器人领域扩张带来的机遇。
@ThematicTrader 关于 $VPG 的论点很棒！完全同意，机器人领域的扩张带来了巨大的机遇。
英文原文
@ThematicTrader Great thesis on $VPG! Fully agree, ramp up on robotics presents an incredibly opportunity
-
推荐研究 $VLN，认为其因现金储备下行风险低且仍被低估。
关于 $VLN 的帖子很棒！我建议每个人都对这类公司进行独立研究。其资产与市值的比率已不再是接近 1:1，但我个人感觉它仍然被严重低估，且由于现金储备充足，下行风险较低。让我们看看下一次财报后市场如何对其定价。
英文原文
Great post on $VLN! I’d recommend everyone do their own research on companies like this. It’s no longer close to 1:1 on assets/MC but personal my feeling was that it’s still deeply misvalued, with low downside risk due to cash balance. We’ll see how things get priced in after their next earnings.
-
作者认为$AVAV因误读合同变更而遭错杀，已逆势加仓。
我的意思是，这相当于国防领域的$CRDO亚马逊连线事件。看看$AVAV： -> 将合同从研发型重新谈判为长期批量合同。 -> 媒体：“噢，不，那个花哨的Scar项目被暂停了” -> 毫无理由地暴跌17%。 当然由你决定，我个人认为这次抛售很愚蠢，所以加仓了。
英文原文
I mean this is the $CRDO Amazon wire incident equivalent. But in the Defense sector. Be $AVAV: -> Renegotiates contract from R&D type to long term volume contract. -> Media: "Oh no the fancy Scar program got halted" -> Sells off 17% for no reason. up to you though, I personally added since I thought this selloff was stupid.
-
$AVAV获14亿合同，转固定价格模式被市场误解
@victor_privin $AVAV 在过去4个月中获得了14亿美元以上的合同。这是一次合同重新谈判（可能长期更有利）。其他交易安排(OTA)协议很多时候是为了原型设计和研发。转向固定价格(FFP)合同 = 锁定批量价格。完全被误解了
英文原文
@victor_privin $AVAV secured $1.4B+ in contracts in the past 4 months. This is a contract renegotiation (possibly better long term). OTA agreements a lot of times is for prototyping and R&D. Moving to an FFP contract = locking in price for volume. Completely misunderstood
-
探讨国防资金与近期大额军购合同对标的的潜在影响。
@diyinvestguy 也许是拟议的1.5万亿美元国防部(DoD)资金，加上委内瑞拉突袭行动带来的顺风以及其他全球冲突。或者，也许是上个月8.74亿美元的综合不定量采购合同(IDIQ)交易，10月份5亿美元无人机(UAS)导弹交易，12月份4200万美元远程火箭炮(LRR)项目交易，以及总计超过14亿美元的更多交易？
英文原文
@diyinvestguy Perhaps the $1.5T proposed DoD funding + tailwinds from Venezuela raid + other global conflicts. Or maybe the $874m idiq deal last month, a $500m uas missile deal in October, another $42m LRR program deal in December, and more totaling $1.4B+?
-
澄清SCAR项目未取消，因误读导致股价大跌，博主趁机加仓$AVAV。
我在$AVAV下跌16%时加仓了。 市场对SCAR项目新闻做出了错误反应。 - 市场认为SCAR项目被取消，因此抛售超15%。 - 事实并非如此。在8-K监管文件中，他们表示将“继续为SCAR项目提供能力和产品”。 - 这是合同重新谈判，并非取消。 此外，这只是一份1.75亿美元的远期营收合同。$AVAV的皇冠明珠是通过Replicator计划部署的Switchblade无人机。 所以我个人今天抄底买入。
英文原文
I’ve added to my $AVAV positions on the 16% dip. Markets made a mistake with regarding the Scar program news. - Markets thought SCAR program was canceled hence 15%+ selloff. - It’s not. In the 8-K regulatory filings they said they would “continue providing capabilities and products for the SCAR program.” - This was contract re-negotiation. Not cancelled. Also this was a small $175m fw revenue contract. $AVAV crown jewel is Switchblade via Replicator So I personally ended up buying the dip today.
-
建议逢低买入AVAV，认为市场对其合同重谈的恐慌被夸大。
@__visionxry__ 恕我直言，$AVAV 在下跌 15% 后是极佳的逢低买入机会。其主要收入来自价值超 10 亿美元的“弹簧刀”复制器（Switchblade Replicator）项目。如果市场因一份正在重新谈判的 1.75 亿美元合同而恐慌，那纯粹是在戏弄投资者。
英文原文
@__visionxry__ IMO $AVAV is a great dip buy on the 15% drop. Main revenue is $1B+ switchblade replicator. Markets are trolling if they’re panicking over a $175m contract that’s getting renegotiated.
-
作者因SSYS看错，转向寻找与Optimus产量强相关的VPG机会。
我在 $SSYS 关于原型机/量产爬坡的论点上搞砸了，所以我想要一个与机器人产量直接挂钩、且每台机器人能贡献高比例营收的机器人概念股。 这属于推测，但考虑到 $VPG 的体量，特斯拉 Optimus 每台机器人中约 3-8% 的 BOM（物料清单）价值对他们来说是不可思议的。
英文原文
I messed up on my $SSYS thesis regarding prototyping/ramp-up, so I wanted a robotics play directly tethered to the amount of robots produced with high % revenue for each robot. This is speculation but an est. 3-8% ~BOM value for each Tesla Optimus is incredible for $VPG given how small they are.
-
VPG被低估机器人拐点，营收增长潜力大，机构或仅时机过早。
许多人基于同比(Y/Y)营收对 $VPG 进行建模，但低估了机器人领域的拐点。从当前水平实现25亿至40亿美元的营收增长，提供了相当高的上行空间和极佳的机器人领域增长敞口。但这只股票已被机构广泛熟知，我认为Citron Research等机构可能只是时机把握有误，因为他们提前了数月甚至数年。
英文原文
A lot of people model $VPG based on Y/Y revenue, but underestimate inflection point for robotics. $2.5-$4B revenue ramp from current levels presents pretty high upside and great exposure to robotics ramp. But it's already a pretty well known stock by institutions, I think Citron and others likely just got timing off since they were months or years ahead of time.
-
作者解释为何逆势做多VPG以提前布局机器人领域。
@alecolace 如果你对 $VPG 持看跌观点，那确实合理！无人机领域确实比机器人领域有更多的催化剂，但我个人想通过 $VPG 提前布局机器人领域的增长。再次强调，这只是我个人的观点，我不指望很多人会同意。
英文原文
@alecolace That's fair if you're bearish on $VPG! Drone sector has a lot more catalysts than robotics for sure, but thought I'd personally frontrun the robotics ramp with $VPG. Again these are just my own personal opinions, I don't expect a lot of people to agree.
-
建仓$VPG，看好其作为$TSLA Optimus核心供应商的高BOM占比及不对称收益。
我已建立 $VPG（市值5.73亿美元）的头寸。 这是我未来在机器人领域的主要敞口，与 $TSLA Optimus 紧密挂钩。 市场完全忽视了这一机器人板块的投资机会： 对于每一台部署的特斯拉 Optimus，$VPG 很可能占据极高的物料清单(BOM)份额。 VPG 可能是特斯拉 Optimus 量产爬坡的主要供应商，这已是公开的秘密。 这一发现最早由 Citron Research 提出（我不居功）。 2025年4月，Citron Research 发布报告，称 VPG 为“隐藏的特斯拉 Optimus 概念股”。 他们指出，VPG 在2023年11月宣布与一家人形机器人开发商达成“重大设计胜利”，就在特斯拉于2023年12月发布 Optimus Gen 2 之前。 Citron：“证据确凿：VPG 不仅向特斯拉 Optimus 供货，还预计从此次扩产中获得巨额收入，但由于保密协议，这部分收入目前对市场不可见。” 我在2025/2026年后期与多家卖方/买方分析师交叉验证了关于 VPG 的信息： 许多来自 Signia Capital 的人士提到 $VPG：“最显著的应用将是特斯拉的 Optimus 机器人，该机器人于2022年原型化，目标在2026年投产”。 然而，由于2023-2025年原型机阶段 Optimus 及其他机器人的量产爬坡并不存在，这一点被完全遗忘了。 然而，鉴于彭博社报道 OpenAI 上周推动机器人领域发展： 我预计机器人行业今年将触及拐点。 该公司基本面已经非常扎实： - 营收7970万美元（同比增长5.3%，但预计因机器人行业而指数级增长） - 毛利率40.5% - 净现金约6500万美元（现金8600万，债务2000万） $VPG 在块状金属箔(Bulk Metal Foil)材料科学/专利方面拥有护城河，引入了 Z-Foil 技术，并实现了垂直整合。虽然我不能说完全理解所有细节，但这正是 $TSLA 与 Vishay 合作进行 Optimus 迭代原型开发和规模化的原因。 关于 BOM： 有一些 BOM 估算如下： 腿部/运动系统：约21,300美元（占成本38%）：集中在高扭矩执行器。 核心稳定性：约15,600美元（28%）：结构性躯干和肩部机构。 灵巧手：约9,500美元（17%）：执行器和 VPG 式传感器。 计算/AI：约2,100美元（4%）：双 FSD 芯片和8摄像头阵列。 但总体而言，我们可以估算每台机器人的价值中约有3-8%归 $VPG 所有，因为 Shoshani 明确表示 VPG 预计每台机器人在ERs中能获得500至1,200美元的收入。 Elon 喜欢吹嘘大数字，但如果按字面意思理解“德州超级工厂年产1000万台的目标” 1000万台机器人/年 × 750美元/台 = VPG 年营收75亿美元。 考虑到 $VPG 是一家目前处于机器人供应链深处的5.74亿美元小市值公司，鉴于其不对称的上行空间，我建立了多头头寸： - 与 $TSLA Optimus 供应链的高度相关性概率高 - 每台部署机器人的 BOM 占比高 - 资产负债表非常干净，这很罕见。 请自行研究，这只是我建立多头的个人思考过程。
英文原文
I've initiated positions in $VPG ($573m). This is my actual/main robotics sector exposure going forward, tethered to $TSLA Optimus. Markets have completely overlooked this robotics sector play: For every Tesla Optimus deployed, $VPG likely takes an exceptionally high BOM for each. It's a pretty open secret by now that VPG is likely a main supplier for Tesla Optimus Ramp. This was first discovered by Citron Research (not taking credit for this). In April 2025, Citron Research published a report calling VPG the "Hidden Tesla Optimus Play." They pointed out that VPG announced a "major design win" with a humanoid developer in November 2023, right before Tesla revealed the Optimus Gen 2 in December 2023. Citron: "The evidence is conclusive: VPG is not only supplying Tesla Optimus but expects substantial revenues from this ramp-up, revenue currently invisible to the market due to confidentiality" I've cross-checked with recent Sellside/Buyside analysts much later in 2025/2026 regarding VPG: Many from Signia Capital mention for $VPG: "The most notable application would be Tesla’s Optimus robot, which was prototyped in 2022 and is targeting production in 2026". However, this was completely forgotten given robotics ramp from Optimus and others were nonexistent through 2023-2025 for the prototyping phase. However, given OpenAI's push to robotics last week per Bloomberg: I expect robotics to hit the inflection point this year. This company is extremely solid fundamentally already: - $79.7 Million Revenue (up 5.3% Y/Y but this should ramp up exponentially due to robotics sector) - 40.5% Gross Margins - ~$65 Million Net Cash ($86m Cash, $20m Debt) $VPG has a material science/patent moat for Bulk Metal Foil, introduced Z-Foil technology, and is vertically integrated. Can't say I understand it all, but it's the reason why $TSLA has been prototyping and scaling their Optimus iterations with Vishay. As for BOM: There are BOM estimates like: Legs/Locomotion: ~$21,300 (38% of cost): concentrated in high-torque actuators. Core Stability: ~$15,600 (28%): structural torso and shoulder mechanisms. Dexterous Hands: ~$9,500 (17%): Actuators and VPG-style sensors. Compute/AI: ~$2,100 (4%): Dual FSD chips and 8-camera array. But generally, we can estimate 3-8% of each robots value is est. $VPG since Shoshani explicitly stated that VPG expects to capture between $500 and $1,200 in revenue per robot in ERs. Elon likes to claim big numbers, but if you take it at face value "10-million-unit annual target at Giga Texas" 10M robots/year × $750/robot = $7.5 Billion in annual revenue for VPG. Considering $VPG is a small $574M company deep in the robotics supply chain right now, I entered long positions given the asymmetrical upside - of high probability correlation to $TSLA Optimus supply chains - high BOM of each robot deployed. - very clean balance sheet, which is rare. Please do your own research, this is my own personal thought process of why I entered this long.
-
警告$DPRO风险极高，强调仓位管理，属投机性押注。
@Aldo_Aurelius 鉴于 $DPRO 营收极低，其风险极高。因此，如果你决定自行建仓，仓位管理(position sizing)至关重要。这绝对不适合所有人，因为它本质上是对无人机产能带来的收入确认(revenue recognition)的一次投机性押注。
英文原文
@Aldo_Aurelius $DPRO is incredibly risky given low revenue. So position sizing is important if you decide yourself you want to take positions. It’s definitely not for everyone as a speculative bet on drone revenue recognition from capacity
-
认为FIG只需降低杂项费用即可改善毛利率表现。
@ShortsHoward @charlieliner 毛利率方面。他们只需要降低杂项费用，$FIG 的财报就会很好看。
英文原文
@ShortsHoward @charlieliner Gross margins though. They just need to lower misc expenses and $FIG prints
-
博主表示持有AXTI以应对其20%的随机波动，避免频繁交易。
@jliljliljlil $AXTI 随机上下波动 20%，我只是持有它，而不是试图进行波段交易。
英文原文
@jliljliljlil $AXTI moves up and down randomly 20%, I just hold it instead of trying to trade it.
-
Figma财务强劲且AI难替代，认为股价超卖。
@ShortsHoward @charlieliner 是的，$10亿 2025财年营收，91%的毛利率（高得离谱），40%的同比增长，$16亿现金且无债务。 看起来超卖了，像Opus这样的AI并不会取代Figma。
英文原文
@ShortsHoward @charlieliner Yeah $1B FY 2025 revenue, 91% gross margins (unholy) 40% y/y growth, $1.6B cash no debt. Seems oversold, AI like Opus doesn’t replace figma.
-
对比RKLB与DPRO的政府资金优势，提示早期风险并看好无人机基建。
好问题！这有点像 $RKLB 虽然来自新西兰，但受益于美国国防部(DoD)的资金支持。 $DPRO 同时受益于加拿大和美国的资金支持，因为它符合《国防授权法》(NDAA)的规定。 再次强调，由于处于早期阶段，存在大量风险，不要指望未来财报发布前会有太多利好被计入股价。我只是认为他们的无人机基础设施(Drone Infra)建设具有潜力。
英文原文
Good question! It’s kinda like $RKLB is from New Zealand but benefits from US DoD funding. $DPRO gets benefits from both Canada and US funding as its ndaa compliant Again there are tons of risks since its early stage and don’t expect much to be priced in until their future earnings. I just thought their drone infra buildout had potential
-
DPRO作为稀缺上市CAD无人机公司，从某观点中受益。
@digestive_bisc 错过了那个巨大的观点，谢谢。$DPRO 作为少数几家上市的计算机辅助设计(CAD)无人机公司之一，从中受益良多。
英文原文
@digestive_bisc Missed out on that huge point thanks. $DPRO benefits a lot from that as one of the only public CAD drone companies.
-
澄清估值指标，分享对PDYN及DPRO作为分包商被算法低估的看法。
承接上文，我想说的是企业价值/收入(EV/Revenue)比率，而非上面的市销率(P/S)。不过我之前也研究过 $PDYN，这是一家有趣的公司。另外，关于 $DPRO 的帖子并没有太多新内容，因为它在 Finx 上已经很流行了。关键在于其基础设施布局+大规模产能爬坡+作为分包商(subcontractor)缺乏亮眼合同这一复杂情况，这往往能触发季度财报(Q reports)中算法可能未定价的因素。很多人忽略了这一点，所以我想分享自己的看法。
英文原文
Pigybacking off of this, meant to say ev/revenue not p/s above. But yeah I looked at $PDYN before too, interesting company. Also there's nothing too new with the $DPRO post since it's already popular on finx. It's just really nuanced with the infrastructure setup + large capacity ramp + no flashy contracts since it's a subcontractor -> hits Q reports that algos might not price in. A lot of people missed that aspect, so just wanted to post my own thoughts about it.
-
建仓$DPRO，视其为无人机战争基础设施，类比早期$RKLB，具高增长潜力。
我建仓了少量 $DPRO（市值2.4亿美元）。 这是一家端到端的战争无人机承包商，Draganfly 看起来像是无人机领域的 $RKLB（Relativity Space）。 $ONDS 从 0.51 美元涨到 15 美元（13倍），我一直在寻找类似的标的。 以下是市场（和我自己）之前忽略的点： Draganfly 是一家垂直整合的国防主承包商，而不仅仅是无人机制造商。 $DPRO 控制着从工厂基础设施到最终无人机的整个生态系统。它是《国防授权法案》（NDAA）禁止大疆（DJI，曾占据估计 70-80% 市场份额）后的最大受益者。 我之前没理解的最大护城河：嵌入式生产（embedded production）。 我关注的是当前较小的营收数字，却忽略了他们正在美国多个基地建设分布式制造能力。 Draganfly 与美国陆军（2025年9月）的合同不仅仅是交付无人机；而是要在美国基地安装微型工厂（Micro-Factories）。 它将 Draganfly 融入美国战争部（Dept. of War）的体系中，创造出竞争对手无法取代的“粘性”。 我建仓的原因是：他们的无人机产能从 2025 年的 500 万美元跃升至 4 亿美元。 结合其与 Global Ordnance 的合作伙伴关系（作为分包商，Ordnance 获得了 7.5 亿美元 IDIQ 合同），以及 US-CAD 项目（双方均受益，如 2.2 亿美元对北约的 CAD 资金）。 $DPRO 有可能实现三位数甚至 1000%+ 的同比增长率。 而且……营收会在财报中以惊喜的方式体现在资产负债表上。 每个无人机玩家如 $AVAV、$AIRO、$ONDS 都有自己的专长，$DPRO 专注于非动能和基础设施方面： -> 瑞典等欧洲国家（2026年）使用 $DPRO 无人机进行救生行动。 -> DEF-C -> 乌克兰冲突中的侦察无人机 -> Global Ordnance（大型国防承包商） -> 美国战争部（美国陆军） 而这些非动能无人机可以转化为动能应用。 手握 5100 万美元现金（健康的资产负债表），仅 20% 的产能爬坡就对应约 2.2 倍远期市销率（p/s）。 这是一个非常投机的风险投资式押注，因为他们正在快速扩张基础设施（就像早期的 $RKLB），Northland 给出了 20 美元的目标价。 这是一种直觉，认为营收将赶上他们在美军中部署的基础设施（特别是 Replicator 项目，且直到财报发布前都是隐藏的）。 $DPRO 在 FinX 上已经很受欢迎（说服其他用户花了一些功夫），所以我个人也加入了这场狂欢，想看看它会走向何方。 TLDR：在 $DPRO 建立少量投机性头寸，因为它有望成为无人机战争的基础设施（就像 2 美元时的 $RKLB 之于太空），具有巨大的上行潜力。 由于处于极早期阶段，随着产能建设的收入确认，也存在大量风险。
英文原文
I’ve initiated small positions in $DPRO ($240m). This is an end-to-end war drone contractor and Draganfly looks like the $RKLB to Ondas. $ONDS went from ($.51 -> $15, 13x) and was looking for an equivalent. Here’s what markets (and myself missed). Draganfly is a vertically integrated defense prime, not just a drone maker. $DPRO controls the entire ecosystem, from the factory infrastructure to the end-drone. And it’s the largest beneficiary of NDAA that banned DJI, which controlled est. 70-80% of market share. The biggest moat I didn’t understand earlier: embedded production. I looked small current revenue numbers but missed the that they’re buildout distributed manufacturing throughout many US bases. Draganfly’s contract with the U.S. Army (Sept 2025) isn't just to ship drones; it is to install Micro-Factories at US bases. It integrates Draganfly into the fabric of US Dpt. of War, creating a layer of "stickiness" that is impossible for competitors to displace. Here's why I entered positions: they went from $5M drone capacity ramp in 2025 to $400m. Combining this with its partnership with Global Ordnance (where it’s a sub-contractor and Ordnance received $750 Million IDIQ), US-CAD programs (benefits from both) like $220m CAD funding to NATO. It’s possible for $DPRO from triple digits or possibly 1000%+ revenue growth rates Y/Y. And... revenue hits balance sheet by surprise in the earnings. Each drone player from $AVAV, $AIRO, $ONDS, have their own specialty, $DPRO focuses on the nonkinetic and infrastructure aspect: -> European countries like Sweden use $DPRO drones (2026) for life-saving operations. -> DEF-C -> reconnaissance drones for Ukraine conflict -> Global Ordnance (massive defense contractor) -> U.S. Department of War (US Army) and those nonkinetic drones can be transformed with kinetic applications. With $51M cash on hand (healthy balance sheet), just 20% of capacity ramp would be ~2.2 fwd p/s. This is a very speculative venture style bet as they've been rapidly expanding infrastructure (like $RKLB at the start), with Northland giving $20 PT's. And this is a hunch that the revenue will catch up to the infrastructure they've deployed across the US army (esp. with Replicator programs and is hidden until earnings). $DPRO has already been popular on FinX (and it took some convincing from other users) so I've personally joined the party as I'm curious to see where it heads. TLDR: took small speculative positions in $DPRO as it's setup to be the Infrastructure of Drone Warfare (like $RKLB back at $2 for space) with high potential upside. As it's extremely early, there's lot of risks as well with revenue recognition from capacity buildout.
-
LPTH因美欧冲突受益，提供美国本土黑钻替代方案，当前下跌属无差别抛售。
$LPTH 实际上是美欧冲突导致供应链中断的主要受益者之一，因为美国从德国和比利时进口大量锗(Germanium)。Lightpath 提供了瓶颈环节的替代方案，其黑钻(Black Diamond)产品 100% 在美国制造（前体也主要来自美国）。这很可能只是一次广泛的无差别抛售。
英文原文
$LPTH is actually one of the big benefiaries of conflicts between US and EU for supply chain disruption as US imports significant amount of germanium from Germany and Belgium. And Lightpath offers the bottleneck alternative with black diamond manufactured 100% in US (precursors mainly US too) This is probably just a wide indiscriminate selloff.