全部推文
共 6413 条 · 第 102 / 214 页 · 滚到底自动加载更多
-
看好 AEHR 接近触发 hyperscaler 需求拐点。
@soup19152116 我已经覆盖过 $AEHR 了，而且我现在是多头，因为我觉得他们快接近 $AAOI 那种超大规模云需求拐点了。 过去两三个月里有不同的订单流，我觉得挺有希望。
英文原文
@soup19152116 I've covered $AEHR already and I'm long since I do think they be close to hitting their $AAOI-type hyperscaler demand inflection point. There were streams of different orders past two to three months, think it's promising.
-
BESI被纳入瓶颈标的，混合键合技术验证供应链重要性，但涨幅预期有限。
$BESIY / $BESI 在我的非正式瓶颈ETF里！不过我还需要补上 $LRCX、$AMAT 和 BESI 的新闻。这确实验证了混合键合(hybrid bonding)对先进封装的重要性。所以仅基于供应链重要性，就是很好的做多标的。但真不觉得它会像上面的其他股票那样涨300%，比如 $AAOI。
英文原文
$BESIY / $BESI was in my informal bottleneck ETF! Still need to catch up to the $LRCX, $AMAT and BESI news though. Does definitely validate how important hybrid bonding is to advanced packaging. So good long just based on supply chain importance. But don't really see it going up 300% like other names above like $AAOI.
-
研究了从 Oxford 到 AIXA 的光子设备公司，但认为多数不会像 AAOI、AXTI、SOI 那样暴涨。
我确实研究过从 Oxford 到 $AIXA 这些和光子设备相关的卖家。 它们会因为光子需求而明显受益，跟 $ASML 那种资本开支周期很像。 但我不觉得它们里有太多公司会像 $AAOI、$AXTI，甚至 $SOI 那样涨 300%+。 不像那些更大的对冲基金 / 机构，我是在用自己的投资组合去追增长，所以只要机会还在，我对很多高 beta 的名字并不排斥。
英文原文
I did look through all the photonics equipment related from sellers from Oxford to $AIXA. They get a material bump from photonics demand, similar to $ASML capex cycles. But I don't think many of them will end up 300%+ like $AAOI, $AXTI, or even $SOI. Unlike larger hedge funds/firms, I'm chasing growth in my personal portfolio, which is why I'm fine with a lot of higher beta names as long as opportunity is there.
-
EWY 的 IV 交易成功后，自己转而看多韩国内存股，认为利润会压过宏观恐慌。
EWY 的 IV 交易是成功的。韩国指数的隐含波动率从 32% IV 上升到了 46-48%。 现在它更像是对 SK 海力士 / 三星内存的方向性做多。 Q1 NAND 价格上调了 100%+，三星据说 Q2 又再提了 100%+。DRAM 价格也远远超出预期。 氦气 / 石油 / LNG 的担忧目前被夸大了，所以我还会继续看多韩国内存板块。 经营利润最终会压过任何宏观恐慌。
英文原文
IV $EWY trade was successful. Volatility of the Korean Index went from 32% IV -> 46-48%. Now it's more of a directional long on memory from SK Hynix/Sasmung. NAND prices hiked up 100%+ Q1 and Samsung reportedly jacked up 100%+ again Q2. DRAM prices also hiked way past expectations. Helium/Oil/LNG fears are overblown currently so I'm staying long on Korean memory sector. Operational income should blow away any macro fears.
-
认为买 Sumitomo 比买 AXT 更像是在降低弹性；AVGO 的光学故事也不如 ASIC 逻辑直接。
这就像买住友而不是 $AXTI。 你买的是一个大巨头，但对这个行业增长的直接暴露更低。一个可能年初至今涨 15%，另一个可能涨 300%。 把 $AVGO 当成光学相关故事去买，而它很大一部分增长其实来自 ASIC，也不是个好主意。不过作为长期多头，它本身还是很不错的。
英文原文
Same as going long on Sumitomo instead of $AXTI. You're buying a big giant for lower direct exposure to the sector growth. Once might be up 15% YTD, the other might be up 300%. Buying $AVGO for optical related stuff when a large portion of their growth comes from ASICs is not a great idea. But as a long itself, it's solid.
-
博主分享光子学供应链投资组合，按风险等级分层推荐多只股票。
我是最早一批覆盖光子学供应链股票的人。 大多数自发布以来涨幅达到100-400%以上。 以下是我的核心论点帖的概要总结： 截至今日“最安全”的多头标的： - $TSEM（高塔半导体） - $SOI（Soitec） - $COHR——随时间推移具有防御性的复利型公司。 Soitec——在硅光子学/共封装光学(CPO)架构攀升中拥有基板垄断地位，估值极低（即使近期上涨40%+，可能仍只有1.4倍市净率）。 高塔半导体——2028年市盈率处于十几倍区间，70%以上的产能已被预订，是$NVDA架构合作伙伴，基本上是光子学领域的纯Play版$TSM。 Coherent——在光子学领域基本上覆盖从材料/基板到激光器再到光收发器的全产业链，同时也是许多其他垂直领域的基础供应商。 最高贝塔/极高增长多头标的： $AXTI——与Sumitomo形成磷化铟(InP)双头垄断（后者正面临出口管制），与Vital在上游原料端形成双头垄断。 基本上，AXT处于整个光子学食物链的顶端。出口管制风险确实存在，但我的论点是：如果AXT倒下，那么AI驱动的光子学建设也会崩塌。所以还不如做多AXT。 $AAOI——到2027年收入增长10倍。激光器->设计->组装，美国制造。主要不确定性在于执行能力、扩大从$COHR收购的激光器产能等。 超大规模数据中心运营商的需求都存在。他们能交付吗？我愿意承担这个风险。 $IQE——基本上完全依赖重组和清理债务（市值约2亿美元）。作为$LITE的外延晶圆(epiwafer)知名供应商，其主要竞争对手Landmark估值超过35亿美元。 其现有产能（反应器）潜力存在，但基本上需要成功转型光子学并切断传统业务的拖累，才能实现10倍的重新定价。 风险最高，但也可能有相应的回报。 做多$GOOGL TPU生态系统相关： $LITE——由于光学电路交换机(OCS)垄断地位，其光学相关的物料清单(BOM)占比非常高。 如果你认为谷歌TPU是一个可能最终像$NVDA那样的万亿美元项目，那就做多$LITE。 谷歌计划2026年资本支出1750-1800亿美元，其AI基础设施CTO表示计划逐年增加，可能在未来8年投入1万亿美元。 如果这个计划成立，$LITE相对于未来潜力来说估值极低。当然，他们也向其他超大规模数据中心运营商供应激光器，但我会说它与谷歌增长的关联度更高。 _ 还有许多其他我覆盖过的标的： $POET——我本人不做多，但其4亿美元资产负债表提供了良好的缓冲。我发现从$MRVL攀升中发现的Celestial项目太遥远——例如2028年预计收入5亿美元、2029年10亿美元——对于2026年来说不具实质意义。 这很大程度上取决于他们的中介器(interposers)是否能获得其他超大规模数据中心运营商的认证，而不是通过Marvell走后门——这是主要的看涨逻辑。 $HIMX——我确实发现这个论点略有说服力，作为可能的$TSM共封装光学(CPO)供应商。 但我个人更偏好$SOI，会将更多集中度投入其中（因为Soitec作为已知供应商已基本覆盖整个硅光子学领域，而且刚从下行周期中走出）。 还有很多其他的如$NOK、$SHMN也很有趣，但我个人已将集中度投入到我认为最有说服力的标的。 像$LITE这样的“拥挤标的”并不意味着没有剩余上涨空间。只是在有新消息之前，估值已经更多地被反映进去了。 存在许多“关键供应商”，但供应链中的重要性...与将其转化为极高营收增长（例如$AAOI -> 45亿美元营收）之间存在差异。 但对于光子学敞口的简要总结，我的投资组合大致如下： 高集中度（更安全）： $TSEM晶圆代工、$SOI基板、$COHR全产业链 做多+卖看跌期权组合（高波动性）： $AXTI基板/原料、$IQE外延晶圆、$AAOI光收发器供应链 然后做多谷歌相关$LITE
英文原文
I've been the first few to cover many supply chain photonic names. Most are up 100-400%+ since I've posted. Here's the TLDR overview of my thesis posts: “Safest” Longs as of Today: - $TSEM (Tower Semi) - $SOI (Soitec) - $COHR - Defensible compounders over time. Soitec - Substrate monopoly over silicon photonics / CPO architectural ramp at dirt cheap valuation (after recent 40%+ rise maybe still 1.4x book) Tower Semi - P/E in the 10's for 2028, 70%+ capacity booked already, $NVDA architectural partner, and basically the pure play $TSM of photonics. Coherent - Basically does everything from materials/substrates to lasers to transceivers in photonics. As well as fundamental supplier to many other verticals. Most High Beta/Extreme Growth Longs: $AXTI - InP duopoly with Sumitomo (that getting export controlled), upstream feedstock duopoly with Vital. Basically at the top of the entire photonics food chain is AXT. There's certainty export control risks, but my thesis is that if AXT goes down, the photonic buildout with AI goes down. So might as well go long on AXT. $AAOI - 10x revenue ramp into 2027. Laser -> Design -> Assembly, Made in America. Main uncertainty is execution, scaling laser capacity that they've bought from $COHR, etc. Demand from hyperscalers are all there. Can they deliver? I'd take the risk. $IQE - Basically completely dependent on restructuring and clearing debt (~$200M MC). Known $LITE supplier for epiwafers, and their main competitor was Landmark with a $3.5B+ valuation. The latent capacity is there with reactors, but they basically need to pull off a successful pivot over to photonics and cut off legacy drag for 10x rerating. Highest risk out there, but maybe worth the reward.s Long $GOOGL TPU Ecosystem: $LITE - Basically very high BOM related to optical due to OCS monopoly for Google. If you think Google TPU is a trillion dollar program that might end up like $NVDA, go long on $LITE. Google has $175-180B capex planned for 2026, and their CTO for AI Infra said they plan to up that Y/Y, probably spending $1 trillion in the next 8 years. If that holds up, $LITE is extremely undervalued relative to forward potential. Of course the supply lasers to other hyperscalers too, but I'd say it's more heavily tethered to Google growth. _ There's a ton of others out there I've covered like: $POET - I'm personally not long, but $400M balance sheet gives it good cushion. Just found Celestial from $MRVL ramp was too far out, eg. $500 million 2028, $1 billion 2029 projections, for revenue to be too material as of 2026. It largely depends if their interposers get other hyperscaler qualifications rather than backdooring through Marvell, which was the main bull case. $HIMX- I did find this thesis to be slightly compelling as a likely $TSM COUPE supplier. But personally, I preferred $SOI, and would just put more concentration into that (since Soitec known supplier already to basically everything silicon photonics, and is just coming out of a downturn). There’s a lot more like $NOK, $SHMN, that are interesting, but I’ve personally out concentration into the ones I find most compelling. As “crowded names” like $LITE, it does not mean there’s no upside left. It just happens to be more priced in until there’s new news. There's a lot of "critical suppliers" but there's a difference between importance in the supply chain... And converting that into extreme revenue growth eg. $AAOI -> $4.5 billion in revenue. But for TLDR photonics exposure, my portfolio looks similar to this: High Concentration (Safer) $TSEM foundry, $SOI substrate, $COHR everything Mix of Long + CSP (High Volaility): $AXTI substrate/feedstock, $IQE epiwafer, $AAOI transceiver supply chain Then Long Google with $LITE
-
说自己的简介没有改，是 X 更新把它截断了。
@RKLBMan @nikitabier 我发誓我没有改过简介，是 X 的某个随机更新把它截断成那样了。
英文原文
@RKLBMan @nikitabier I swear I did not change anything in my bio, there was some random X update that clipped it like that.
-
请求回滚被截断的简介更新。
@nikitabier 能不能把那个把简介截断的更新回滚一下？ 这让我看起来很糟。 https://t.co/cqlNdQXoGf
英文原文
@nikitabier Can you revert the clipped bio change update? It’s making me look bad https://t.co/cqlNdQXoGf
-
说自己并没有持有 OPTT 或 KRKNF，只是在列举潜在受益者。
@NickPappagiorg 我个人并没有持有 $OPTT 或 $KRKNF。 我只是提到了一个重要催化剂和它的受益者，以防其他人觉得它们足够有吸引力，可以去做多。
英文原文
@NickPappagiorg I personally don’t have exposure to $OPTT or $KRKNF. I’m just citing a major catalyst and beneficiaries, in case others found it compelling enough to go long on.
-
指出 OII 也是热门标的之一，自己只是挑了几个散户更熟的名字。
@section023 $OII 也是另一个很热门的名字。这样的标的其实还有不少，我只是想聚焦几个在 X 上更受散户欢迎的。
英文原文
@section023 $OII is another popular one. There’s quite a few out there, just wanted to focus on a few that were more popular with retail on X.
-
推测这场油价叙事背后，是美元计价与长期地缘政治主导权。
@FL_DAYTR8R 我猜这背后是美元计价，以及石油交易和长期地缘政治主导权。 这就是石油美元战争理论。
英文原文
@FL_DAYTR8R My guess is for the US dollar denomination with the oil trade and long term geopolitical dominance. It’s the petrodollar war theory.
-
根据 WSJ 关于伊朗海雷的报道，认为海底防御板块将获得更多关注和合同。
WSJ：伊朗海雷是它最强大的武器之一。 “水雷一直是美国海军面对过最具破坏性的武器之一。” 现在更多注意力正被投向水下防御板块。 像 $KRKNF、$OPTT、$CODA 这类在 X 上很热门、用于声呐和反水雷应用的海洋防御公司，可能会获得更多投资者关注，甚至拿到防务合同。 尤其当美国媒体周期开始聚焦霍尔木兹海峡下的水雷时。
英文原文
WSJ: Iran’s Sea Mines Are One of Its Most Powerful Weapons “Mines have been among the most destructive weapons that the U.S. Navy has faced” More attention is now being poured into the Underwater defense sector. Ocean defense names such as $KRKNF, $OPTT, and $CODA that are popular on X for sonar and mine neutralization applications. May finally see more investor attention and possible defense contracts. Especially as US media cycles focus on the mines beneath the Strait.
-
认为 AAOI 短期会受 2.5 亿美元 ATM 压制，100 美元附近或有阻力，但长期不重要。
短期看，$AAOI 正在以 100 美元的价格做 2.5 亿美元稀释，所以在一段时间内可能不会明显高于这个价位。 因为他们就是在这个价格卖给公开市场。上一个 ATM 他们很快就吸收完了。 中长期其实没那么重要。 如果我切换成日内交易员的眼镜来看，要是它再跌一次到 80 美元区间，我个人会很乐意买。
英文原文
Short term, $AAOI is diluting $250m at $100 so probably won’t go too high above that number for awhile. Cause they’re selling it but the open market at that price. They tapped into their last ATM ASAP. Mid-Long term doesn’t really matter. If I put on my day trading glasses, if it drops one more time to the $80s, strong yes imo.
-
强调仓位管理很重要，若因 AAOI 一只票下跌就睡不着，说明仓位配得不对。
@k_a_y_b_e_e_ 仓位管理极其重要。 如果因为像 $AAOI 这样的单一持仓一跌就睡不着，那大概率是你的配置方式出了问题。
英文原文
@k_a_y_b_e_e_ Position sizing is extremely important, if you can’t sleep at night because one position like $AAOI is red, you’re probably allocating wrong.
-
用 AI 供应链映射的梗调侃 Meta 的业绩波动
你说得对，算法确实从 AI 供应链映射里学到了一些东西。 肥料暴涨 -> $META 牛油果 -> 抛售。
英文原文
@Shabach17 You’re right, algorithms have been taking some lessons from AI supply chain mapping. fertilizer spike -> $META avocados -> selloff.
-
认为 Meta 的增长指引说明投入开始见效
他们给出的指引是同比增长约 33.5%（535 亿到 565 亿美元），而这还是一家市值 1.5 万亿美元以上的公司。 看起来扎克在 $META 上砸的钱，似乎确实开始起作用了。
英文原文
@mktoperative They guided ~33.5% y/y growth ($53.5B- $56.5B) as a $1.5T+ company. Think whatever Zuck is spending on with $META seems to be working.
-
认为 Meta 这波回撤有点过头
你们觉得市场不知道 $META 的收入全来自卖广告吗？ 又不是种牛油果？ 过去一个月总共跌了 16.92%，其中这次又跌了 4%，我觉得有点过头了。
英文原文
Do you think markets know $META makes all their revenue from selling ads? Not farming avocados? -4% selloff for a total of -16.92% this past month is a bit too much. https://t.co/wMkcrMaIhX
-
调侃做空无限印钞机不现实
这老哥真觉得你能把无限印钞机给逼空啊，笑死。
英文原文
@TBaker1646652 Bro really thinks you can short squeeze the infinite money printer lol
-
调侃美国政府可能在压低油价
这段太好笑了： “周一，布伦特原油一度冲到接近每桶 120 美元，随后又急转直下，回落到 100 美元下方。” “客户一直追问我们，到底是谁在大举抛售，”Skirrow 说。“市场猜测可能是美国财政部。” 美国有动机压低油价，所以我不会跟政府去对赌。
英文原文
This was hilarious: “On Monday, Brent crude oil leapt to almost $120 a barrel before reversing sharply to fall back below $100. “We were being pushed by clients as to who the big seller was,” Skirrow said. “The speculation was that it could be from the US Treasury” The US has an incentive to keep oil prices down, so would not place my bets against the government.
-
继续看空原油多头，押注美国政府压价
那些看多原油到 150-200 美元的人： 很快就会体会到白银纸面价格操纵是什么滋味。 这次不是来自做市银商或 CME，而是来自美国政府。 《金融时报》称： “美国财政部正在考虑压低油价的措施，包括干预期货市场。” 他补充说：“市场猜测可能是美国财政部，”并指出政府此前也干预过其他市场。 我不会去和想压住原油价格的美国政府对着干。
英文原文
The $150-200 Crude Oil longs: Are about to get a taste of what the Silver paper price manipulation is like. This time, it’s coming from the US Gov, not bullion banks/CME. Per Financial Times: “US Treasury was considering measures to lower oil prices, including intervention in futures markets.” The speculation was that it could be from the US Treasury,” he added, noting that the government has previously intervened in other markets. I would not position against the US government wanting to contain crude oil prices.
-
提示 AAOI 在 100 美元附近会有 ATM 压力
@scarfo_leo $AAOI 有一个 5 亿美元的 ATM，行权/发行价在 100 美元附近，那个价位大概会有 2.5 亿美元的卖压，持续不了太久。
英文原文
@scarfo_leo $AAOI has a $500m ATM at $100, probably going to be $250m selling pressure at that level for a tiny bit
-
指出 AXTI 站在光子供应链最上游
InP 衬底，以及制造它们所需的原材料。 基本上，如果你一路追到整个光子供应链的最上游，也就是 $GOOGL 的 TPU 或 $LITE 所用到的那一层，那里站着的就是 $AXTI，像宝可梦冠军一样。
英文原文
@DhruTech InP substrates and raw materials needed to build them. Basically if you go to the very very top of the entire photonics supply chains that $GOOGL TPUs or $LITE uses. There sits $AXTI as the Pokémon champion
-
开玩笑说自己本该去买 Soitec 期权
@Investmnt_Eagle @realstockfox 我本来应该买期权的，没想到 Soitec 还有这玩意儿。
英文原文
@Investmnt_Eagle @realstockfox I should have done options, didn’t realize there was something for that on Soitec
-
称赞 Soitec 是下一只衬底概念股
@realstockfox 我之前喊过 Soitec 会成为下一个衬底主题股，现在 $SOI 已经涨了 44%+。
英文原文
@realstockfox I did shoutout Soitech as the next upcoming substrate play and $SOI is now up 44%+ https://t.co/qsuIf3cjNd
-
把 TSEM 当稳健复合器，把 AXTI 当高弹性标的
有 $TSEM 这种更稳的光子复合器。 然后还有我那匹打了类固醇、装了火箭发动机的赛马：$AXTI。 我的仓位已经涨了 550%+。 而 AXT 今天又涨了 10.38%。 $NVDA 的回报都被甩在后面了；几个月前把 AXT 识别为 InP 瓶颈，很多人因此实现了代际财富。
英文原文
There’s $TSEM, my safer photonics compounder. Then there’s my race horse on steroids, with a rocket ship attached: $AXTI. My positions are up over 550%+. And AXT is up another 10.38% today. $NVDA returns got left in the dust, as identifying AXT as the InP bottleneck few months ago was generational wealth to many.
-
继续看好 Tower Semiconductor 作为稳健光子复合股
$TSEM 根本不在乎市场其他部分。 Tower Semi 是我最喜欢的光子标的之一，像更稳健版的 $TSM 式复合器。 这是 AI 新范式的一部分。 今天又涨了 5.8%。
英文原文
$TSEM does not concern itself with the rest of the market. Tower semi is one of my favorite photonic names, as a safer $TSM like compounder. For the new paradigm of AI. Up 5.8% today. https://t.co/UcH1K6C4UI
-
认为 Reddit 的内幕卖出不构成噪音
@NegativeConvex 不，$RDDT 的内幕减持不算什么噪音。
英文原文
@NegativeConvex No, insider sales are noise for $RDDT. https://t.co/4szrTTanbF
-
给 PayPay 研究者的简短结论：估值不便宜
谢谢，想顺手替大家节省一点研究 $PAYP 的时间；之所以感兴趣，是因为我在日本也听过这个名字。 也许有一天它会在日本变得像 $HOOD 一样，但按现在的指标看，估值已经相当高了。所以我自己最后选择了放弃，不过希望这能给其他研究它的人提供一个不错的 TL;DR / 起点。
英文原文
Thanks, thought I'd save others some time with $PAYP, got interested since I've heard of the name before in Japan. Maybe it ends up like $HOOD one day in Japan, but already pretty richly valued from metrics. So I personally ended up passing, but hope it's a good TLDR/starting point for others researching.
-
拆解 PayPay IPO 的基本面与估值
PayPay（$PAYP）是最新上市的公司。 如果你在想，要不要冲一下这家日本的“$PYPL / WeChat”公司，市值 118 亿美元？ 那我们来看看。 如果你去过日本，你就会知道 PayPay 到处都是。 它是日本版超级 App，涵盖支付、投资和银行业务。 下面拆一下： 2025 财年指标： 收入：2991 亿日元（约 19 亿美元） 增速：约 26.3% 净利润（GAAP）：392 亿日元（约 2.48 亿美元） 市盈率：约 44 倍 股权薪酬：几乎为 0，不像美国的 $SNAP 和 $DUOL。 看资产负债表： 合并会计让 $PAYP 的账目非常难读。 4.85 万亿日元（约 323 亿美元）的负债或客户存款被混在资产里。 但上市前净负债大约是 -4.8 亿美元，上市募资后约 4.96 亿美元。 所以资产负债表大致是净现金略偏正，但整体中性。 另外提醒一下：软银是大股东，锁定期到 2026 年 9 月才到期。 按 118 亿美元估值，它大约是 5.8 倍 PS，对一家以 26% 增速、利润率还在扩张、且几乎没有 SBC 的日本超级 App 来说，这算是正常估值，不算特别便宜，也不算离谱。 TL;DR：总体上看，$PAYP 按 118 亿美元估值并不差。 后面可能会有 IPO 热度，再叠加低流通盘效应；但如果股价再涨很多，我不会追。 也许它会像 $HOOD 一样，靠 TAM 扩张慢慢抬估值。 不过几个月后软银那类类似 ATM 的压制也会出现。 但眼下还有更便宜的错价机会，比如 $RDDT。
英文原文
PayPay ( $PAYP ) is the newest IPO. If you're wondering if you should fomo in the $PYPL / WeChat of Japan at an $11.8B MC? Let's find out. If you've ever been to Japan: PayPay is everywhere. It's the Japanese SuperApp for payments, investing, and banking. Here's a breakdown: FY 2025 metrics: Revenue: ¥299.1 billion (~$1.9 billion) Growth Rate: ~26.3% Net Income (GAAP): ¥39.2 billion (~$248 million) P/E: ~44x Stock Base Compensation: Virtually 0, unlike $SNAP and $DUOL in the US. If we look at balance sheet: Consolidated accounting makes things a nightmare when you see $PAYP ¥4.85 Trillion (~$32.3 Billion) in liabilities or customer deposits mixed into assets. But pre-IPO net debt is approximately -$480M, and post-IPO proceeds of ~$496M. So balance sheet looks roughly net cash slightly positive but neutral. Also PSA: Softbank is the majority owner, lockup expires September 2026. At $11B, it's roughly ~5.8x P/S and very profitable for a Japanese superapp growing at 26% with expanding margins and zero SBC. By US standards, this is normally valued, not exactly a screaming buy. TLDR: In general, $PAYP is not a terrible long at $11.8B. Might get some IPO hype + mixed with low float dynamics, but would not chase if it ends up a lot higher. Maybe there's some TAM expansion like $HOOD that prices it up over time. But Softbank ATM-like overhang in a few months. But there's a lot better mispriced choices out there like $RDDT right now.
-
强调自己不受研究机构立场约束
和其他在研究机构或基金工作的人相比，我是独立的。 所以我可以直说：有人花几百万去把 $PLTR 这种国防承包商，和给小企业写博客的辅助工具硬做比较，我当然有资格吐槽。 更妙的是，跟着他的人也在市场里继续亏更多钱。
英文原文
I’m independent compared to others who work at research firms or funds. So I’m allowed to speak my mind about someone who charges millions to compare $PLTR, a defense contractor, with small business blogging helpers. Best of all, the following him are also losing more money on top in the market.