全部推文
共 6424 条 · 第 141 / 215 页 · 滚到底自动加载更多
-
做多AEHR博弈存储与光子机会，MRVL因客户ASIC延期推迟至下半年建仓。
我目前做多 $AEHR，以防三大存储巨头将其用于 HBM DRAM 裸片老化测试，或超大规模云厂商扩大 Sonoma 的使用。此外，硅光子学也是另一个关注领域。因此，这更像是一个投机性的“登月”选择，旨在观察其能否与 Advantest 和 $TER 竞争。至于 $MRVL，我喜欢它，但我认为更适合等到 2026 年下半年再建仓。有报道称 $MSFT Maia 路线图延迟了约半年，而 Marvell 预期的收入增长很大一部分依赖于该超大规模云厂商的特定 ASIC 项目。因此，我将在今年晚些时候重新评估它。
英文原文
I'm actually long $AEHR right now in the event any of the big three memory companies use them for HBM DRAM die burn in or hyperscalers expands Sonoma usage. Then there's silicon photonics, which is another area of interest. So it's more of a speculative moonshot pick to see if it can compete with Advantest and $TER. As for $MRVL, I like it but I find it more of a wait until H2 2026 long. There were reports $MSFT Maia faced roadmap longer delays by like half a year and a large part of marvell's expected revenue growth is tethered to this specific hyperscaler ASIC program. So I'll revisit it later on in the year.
-
转发提及用户，无实质内容。
@KamilPokora1 https://t.co/sZgEHHle53
英文原文
@KamilPokora1 https://t.co/sZgEHHle53
-
博主回复将重新查看对方内容。
@adenois 我会再仔细看看，谢谢。
英文原文
@adenois I'll look over it again thanks
-
修正对$SSYS看法，转向偏好高BOM价值的$VPG以捕捉机器人量产红利。
之前在 $SSYS 上犯了个错，误以为他们为机器人原型打印框架。 他们更像是机器人领域的 $ASML（阿斯麦）。 关于机器人量产爬坡（每生产一个人形机器人），我发过一篇帖子，将 $SSYS 替换为 $VPG，并引用了 @SigniaCapital 关于 Optimus 应用的分析。 其中提到，每生产一台机器人（$TSLA Optimus），他们预计每台获利约 500-1200 美元。 话虽如此，我确信 $SSYS 是个不错的长线标的，毕竟有位著名的政治家看准了一切，其投资组合中持有 $SSYS。 但我不像以前那样看好了，我更希望直接参与具有高物料清单(BOM)价值的机器人量产环节，而非初期的原型制作。
英文原文
So made the mistake earlier with $SSYS regarding the fact they print the frames for the prototypes of the robotics. They're more like an $ASML for robotics. For the robotics ramp (each humanoid produced), I made a post switching $SSYS with $VPG and quoted @SigniaCapital's analysis regarding applications for Optimus. There was a quote that for each robot ( $TSLA Optimus) produced, they make est. ~$500-$1.2K per robot. That being said, I'm sure it's a good long, there's one famous politician that got everything right and has $SSYS in their portfolio. But I'm not as bullish as I once was I wanted exposure to the direct robotics ramp with high BOM rather than initial prototyping.
-
InP是AI基建刚需且依赖中国，垂直整合无法解决材料瓶颈。
观点中肯，但有两点误解： - 美国AI基础设施建设必须使用磷化铟(InP)，这是不可妥协的。我们近期看到“交易”案例：$NVDA GPU换取解除关键材料/原料/衬底禁令。美中虽为最大地缘政治对手，却不幸相互依赖。 - 尽管今日小幅回调，7N铟在SMM已创历史新高，而光子学(CPO)产能爬坡甚至尚未开始。你提到硅光(SiPh)替代，但无法替代InP。定制芯片可能采用硅+InP激光器的混合方案，但仍需InP。 - 需求呈指数级增长，$NVDA已锁定外延量子阱激光器(EML)产能，$MSFT Maia预计将占据两位数比例的InP供应链。我高度怀疑库存足以让所有人持续获取。 - 当然，或者他们可以通过涨价来弥补良率损失。 - 这不是垂直整合能解决的。整个供应链是物理/材料问题，因为大部分资源仅在中国可及。 超大规模云厂商可以垂直整合掉$LITE，但无法整合掉原始前驱体或材料。
英文原文
Fair points and two misunderstandings: - US requires InP for AI buildout. This is non-negotiable. And we saw that "trade", $NVDA GPUs for unblocking critical materials/feedstock/substrates bans recently. US and China unfortunately are dependent on one another despite being the biggest geopolitical adversaries. - We're already seeing 7n indium reach ATHs on SMM (depsite recent dip today), and photonics ramp hasn't even started the curve yet. You say SiPh substitution, but you can't substitute away InP. Custom chips might use hybrid w/silicon + InP laser but you still need it. - It scales up exponentially, $NVDA secured EML capacity, $MSFT maia is expected to take up double digits of inp supply chain. Highly doubt there's enough inventory for everyone to keep it accessible. - Sure, or they can price hike to make up for yield - This is not something you can vertically integrate. The entire supply chain is a physics/materials problem because majority is only accessible in China. Hyperscalers can vertically integrate away $LITE but not the raw precursors or materials.
-
看好AXTI作为光子学InP材料瓶颈，预计2026下半年因需求激增出现短缺。
我持有 $AXTI 的多头头寸。 今天我们正目睹 $SNDK、$MU、SK 海力士和三星带来的 HBM/NAND 超级周期，由于需求极度旺盛，价格持续上涨。 下一个是什么？-> 光子学 | 共封装光学(CPO) | 光互连。 需求规模呈现抛物线式增长。（Lightcounting 数据） 我对 AXT 的投资逻辑是：它是从磷化铟(InP)衬底到前驱体供应链的材料瓶颈。而 LightCounting 在过去几个月将需求预测翻了三倍。 这是一个物理/材料问题。 未来，西方供应链可以通过硅光子(SiPh)或 $POET 中介层来减少 InP 衬底/原料的使用。但超大规模云服务商无法绕过这一限制。 目前，中游瓶颈如 $LITE、$COHR、$AVGO 等依赖住友 | JX（日本）等西方供应链。 但这些公司使用的许多前驱体源自中国。在中国最近的出口管制后，日本公司虽有部分产能，但缺乏原料前驱体，他们可能正在消耗库存（约1年，无公开信息）。 但随着超大规模云服务商需求激增，库存将耗尽，使 $AXTI 掌握更多供应链控制权。 我们已经看到 $NVDA 确保了 EML 产能（使用 InP）。CPO CW 激光器、SOA 和其他组件也使用 InP。 “短缺”瓶颈正是 $AXTI 卡脖子的 InP 晶圆产线。 根据预测，我预计超大规模云服务商将在 2026 年开始为 2028 年的扩张储备库存，导致 2026 年下半年供应短缺。 $AXTI 的主要问题在于出口管制 + 60 天行政延迟。中国可能正通过 $AXTI 出牌，迫使美国超大规模云服务商依赖其供应链而非日本。 这在财报前的延迟收入确认中体现为双刃剑。但这些出口管制对住友等竞争对手伤害最大。 即使上游没有看到 100% 的月度涨价，基准情形下 InP 衬底和前驱体需求的增加也将提升 AXT 的营收底线。 AXT 仍是我对 2027 年及以后即将到来的超大规模光子学扩张最看多的材料瓶颈标的。 起初我认为这只是一个短期的风险对冲交易，但在研究了涉及光子学的新数据和架构后，我认为 $AXTI 将是未来 AI 建设的关键参与者。 我的逻辑可能过早，或者这恰恰是拐点。
英文原文
I'm long shares on $AXTI. We're seeing the HBM/NAND supercycle with $SNDK, $MU, Sk Hynix, and Samsung today. With constant price hikes due to extreme demand. The next? -> Photonics | CPO | Optical Interconnects. Demand scale up looks parabolic. (Lightcounting) My thesis was on on AXT was that they're the material bottleneck from InP Substrates to the precursor supply chain. And LightCounting's projections tripled the demand forecast in the past few months. This is a physics/material problem. In the future, Western supply chains can engineer away less InP substrates/feedstock usage with SiPh or $POET interposers. But hyperscalers can't get around it. Currently, midstream bottlenecks like $LITE, $COHR, $AVGO, and others rely on Western supply chains like Sumitomo | JX (Japan). But many precursors that companies these companies originated from China. After China's most recent export controls, the Japanese companies have some production, but without raw precursors, they are likely using inventory (maybe 1 year, there is no public information). But as hyperscaler demand ramps up, the inventory will disappear, leaving more control of the supply chain to $AXTI. We've already see $NVDA secure EML capacity (which uses InP). CPO CW lasers, SOA, and other components also use InP. The "shortage" bottleneck is the same InP wafer lines that $AXTI chokepoints. Judging from the projections, I expect hyperscalers to start securing inventory for the 2028 ramp in 2026, leading to supply shortages H2 2026. $AXTI's main issue is export controls + 60D administrative delays. China is likely playing their hand with $AXTI to force American hyperscalers to become dependent on their supply chain over Japan. This has been a double edged sword as seen with their pre-earnings release with delayed revenue recognition. But these export controls hurt their competitors in Sumitomo the most. Even if we don't see 100% monthly price hikes upstream, the base-case is ramped up demand for InP substrates and precursors increasing AXT's bottom line revenue. AXT remains my most bullish material chokepoint play for the impending hyperscale photonics ramp in 2027 -> onward. Before I expected this to be a short few month play for risk management, but after looking new data and architectures involving photonics, I think $AXTI will likely be a critical player for the AI buildout moving forward. My thesis might be early, or perhaps this may very well be the inflection point.
-
博主质疑阿尔特曼指责英伟达的动机。
@michaeljburry 这基本上就是山姆·阿尔特曼(Sam Altman)，不知道他为什么指责 $NVDA https://t.co/GPAPcIg5iI
英文原文
@michaeljburry This is basically Sam Altman, don’t know why he’s blaming $NVDA https://t.co/GPAPcIg5iI
-
探讨PLTR高估值是否已反映增长预期及政府合同风险。
我很欣赏对 $PLTR 的坚定信念！可能之前错过了，但你对它的投资逻辑是什么？ 他们同比增长 70%，这太疯狂了，但我好奇你是否认为随着市值（MC）的扩大，增长预期已经像 $HOOD 因加密货币收入担忧从 140 美元下跌那样被完美定价了？ 据我所见，远期市盈率（Forward P/E）仍在 ~128-132 倍左右。 如果他们能像其他承包商那样保持复利增长，我认为论点成立（例如 40 法则），但我看到的最大风险可能是下一届政府更迭带来的合同变化（因此友好政府的顺风可能消失，因为政府合同约占收入的 66%）。 许多进步派民主党人似乎都在批评 Palantir。
英文原文
I love the conviction on $PLTR! Probably missed it before but what's your thesis on it? They're growing 70% Y/Y, which is insane, but curious if you think growth is already priced into perfection with the MC (as seen with $HOOD's drop from $140 off crypto rev concerns). Forward P/E from what I've seen is still around ~128-132x. If they could keep compounding like other contractors, I see the argument would make sense eg. rule of 40, but biggest risk I see might be next administration change w/contracts (so tailwind from friendly Admin might disappear and since gov contracts was ~66% of rev). Lot of progressive democrats seem to criticize Palantir.
-
若达摩根士丹利EPS预测且存储周期持续，上行空间巨大。
@Alisvolatprop12 哇，那是一笔惊人的数量，且上行空间巨大！ 如果他们在2027年达到摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)预测的每股收益(EPS)，且存储超级周期(memory supercycle)持续，我可以看到这种情况发生。
英文原文
@Alisvolatprop12 Wow that’s an incredible amount and a lot of upside! I can see that happening if they hit Morgan Stanley’s projected EPS in 2027 and memory supercycle continues
-
SK海力士拟赴美上市，韩股高净利引美资关注
@Alisvolatprop12 三星电子(Samsung Electronics)和SK海力士(SK Hynix)在2026~2027年预计获得的净利润真的非常惊人。我听说SK海力士计划在美国股市上市，我确信许多美国投资者渴望获得韩国股票的投资敞口(Exposure)。
英文原文
@Alisvolatprop12 삼성전자와 SK하이닉스가 2026~2027년에 거둘 것으로 예상되는 순이익은 정말 엄청난 수준입니다. SK하이닉스가 미국 증시에도 상장될 예정이라고 들었는데, 많은 미국 투자자들이 한국 주식에 대한 투자 기회(익스포저)를 원하고 있을 것이라 확신합니다.
-
关注WIX以佐证前述观点
@DaSteeringWheel 我正在关注 $WIX，这进一步佐证了我上述的观点 https://t.co/PVLmLStSoG
英文原文
@DaSteeringWheel I'm watching $WIX, it just adds to my case above https://t.co/PVLmLStSoG
-
不建议买3倍杠杆ETF，建议用保证金替代。
无法推荐像 $KORU 这样的3倍杠杆ETF，因为随着时间推移存在波动率衰减(volatility decay)以及黑天鹅事件(black swan events)的风险。 看看周五白银暴跌33%的情况就知道了。不是说韩国ETF也会发生这种事，但风险是非零的。 如果你想要更高的杠杆，直接在 $EWY 或 $FLKR 上使用保证金(margin)即可。
英文原文
Can't recommend 3x leveraged ETFs like $KORU because of volatility decay over time and black swan events. Just look at what happened with Silver on Friday crashing 33%. Not saying it's going to happen with Korean ETFs, but the risk is nonzero. Just use margin on $EWY or $FLKR if you want more leverage.
-
韩国存储股估值极低，建议通过ETF或个股配置。
韩国存储股可能仍有大量重估空间。 2026年远期市盈率（摩根士丹利）： SK海力士 ~4.3倍 三星电子 ~5.1倍 相关标的：$EWY 或 $FLKR | $HY9H。 即便每月上涨15-30%，它们依然处于历史最便宜水平。 https://t.co/lzUH0jWxk1
英文原文
Korean memory stocks likely have a lot of repricing to do. Forward P/E for 2026 (Morgan Stanley): SK Hynix ~4.3x Samsung Electronics ~5.1x For exposure: $EWY or $FLKR | $HY9H. Even after going up 15-30% every month, they're cheaper than ever. https://t.co/lzUH0jWxk1
-
澄清NBIS法律国籍及市场认知，指出其与IREN等新云公司近期走势分化。
@Andr12988772 你澄清这一点是对的。$NBIS 是一家法律意义上的荷兰公司。我说的是，由于关联和业务运营，市场将其视为以色列公司。最近我们也观察到 $IREN、$NBIS 和其他新云(neoclouds)公司之间出现了分化。
英文原文
@Andr12988772 You're right to clarify that. $NBIS is a legally dutch company. I was saying that markets treat it as Israeli due to ties and operations. We've also seen a divergence between $IREN, $NBIS, and other neoclouds recently.
-
博主坦言投资也有亏损，指出部分AI股估值与现金或基本面严重脱节。
我完全没头绪。很多人看到我发了大量像 $OSS 或 $AXTI 这样的高收益论点帖子，但当我判断错误时，我也确实会亏钱。 而且我确实是真金白银地践行我的观点（skin in the game）。 我曾与其他分析师讨论，他们都感到困惑。对于 $ETOR 和 $VLN，我发现它们与市场的明显脱节，两者交易价格接近其现金余额，但显然市场并不认同我的观点。 如果 $NBIS 正在通过自动取款机(ATM)增发，那稍微说得通一些，但其运营业务并未通过分部加总法(Sum of Parts)得到正确定价。 至于 Nebius，如果市值仍为 210 亿美元，而年底年化经常性收入(ARR)为 70 亿美元，那我就不知道了。
英文原文
I have 0 clue. Lot of people see me making tons off thesis posts like $OSS or $AXTI but I do lose money too when I'm wrong. And I do put my money where my mouth is. I've had discussions with other analysts and they're all puzzled. $ETOR, $VLN I've identified clear disconnects with the market with both of them trading near cash balance but clearly market doesn't agree with me. $NBIS makes slightly more sense if they're going through their ATM now, but their operating business is not being priced in with Sum of Parts correctly. With Nebius, if the MC is still the same at $21B with $7B ARR EOY, then idk.
-
质疑以色列股票估值过低，认为存在分部加总套利机会。
市场对以色列股票有什么偏见吗？ 我在其中一些股票上损失惨重。 $ETOR 和 $VLN 的市值已接近其现金资产价值。 而对于 $NBIS，其投资组合公司 Clickhouse 的估值几乎已超过其主体公司。 尽管地缘政治风险已计入溢价，但这些估值仍显得不合逻辑。 市场几乎将其实际业务价值归零，尽管它们都在增长，特别是 $ETOR（资产管理规模增长 70%+）产生了可观的自由现金流(FCF)。 我 genuinely 感到惊讶，我在想这是否是一个利用资产负债表进行分部加总(SOTP)套利的潜在交易机会。 或者抛售会持续下去？ 这里存在巨大的认知偏差。
英文原文
What do markets have against stocks from Israel? I’ve lost an incredible amount on some of these. Both $ETOR and $VLN are close to cash-assets | marketcap. And with $NBIS their portfolio company Clickhouse is almost worth more than their main company at this point. Geopolitical risks factored into premiums, none of the valuations make sense. The market is assigning close to 0 value to their actual business even through they’re all growing with $ETOR in specific (70%+ AUM growth) producing considerable FCF. Im genuinely surprised, l wonder if it’s a potential trade arbitraging sum of parts to balance sheets. Or would the selloff continue? There’s a huge disconnect.
-
博主谦虚回应感谢，承认SNDK投资者收益可能优于自己。
@PhotonCap @KawzInvests 谢谢！我相信肯定有很多人的回报率比我高。 $SNDK 的投资者可能已经跑赢了我的投资组合 https://t.co/ewZGEiY9j7
英文原文
@PhotonCap @KawzInvests Thank you! I’m sure a lot of people have better returns out there. $SNDK investors would probably would have outperformed my portfolio https://t.co/ewZGEiY9j7
-
博主表示需通过交易来缓解抑郁情绪。
@EndicottInvests 必须通过交易来摆脱我的抑郁。
英文原文
@EndicottInvests Gotta trade my way out of depression
-
前员工评价英特尔高管聪明但官僚严重，人才流失致其老化。
就个人而言，我在$INTC共事的高管是我认识的最聪明的人。但作为一个整体，那里充斥着过多的臃肿和官僚主义，导致几乎什么都无法完成。此外，当时的看法是，所有年轻人才都流向了FAANG和更炙手可热的公司，因此英特尔正慢慢变成一只老恐龙。
英文原文
Individually at $INTC the execs I worked with were the most intelligent people I knew. Together, there was just too much bloat, bureaucracy, and nothing couldn’t get accomplished. The view also was that all the younger talent also went to FAANG and hotter companies so it was slowly becoming an old dinosaur
-
博主回忆在英特尔工作期间，因管理层原因导致AI穿戴项目被雪藏。
@beauty_oe @jukan05 嗯，我的第一份工作是在 $INTC（英特尔）。当时我在 Moonshot Lab（月光石实验室），开发类似现在 $META（Meta）AI 的穿戴设备。但因为管理层的原因，所有项目都被雪藏了。看着酷炫的项目无法面世而消亡，确实令人悲伤。
英文原文
@beauty_oe @jukan05 うん、最初の職場は $INTC だったよ。 ムーンショット・ラボにいて、今の $META AI みたいなウェアラブルの開発をしてたんだ。 でもマネジメントのせいで、プロジェクトは全部お蔵入りになっちゃってさ。クールなプロジェクトが日の目を見ずに消えていくのは、やっぱり悲しいね。
-
作者以在英特尔的首份工作为例，指出当时高管看空但长期持有仍有15%收益。
@jukan05 哈哈，我的第一份工作是在 $INTC（英特尔）。当时我接触的所有高管都认为那是一家死气沉沉的公司。 如果我在当时买入，8年后我的收益将稳稳达到15%。
英文原文
@jukan05 lol my first job was at $INTC. All the executives I talked to thought it was a dead company. If I bought in at that time, I’d be up a solid 15% 8 years later.
-
多数板块大跌，仅AI板块支撑市场。
@moninvestor 是的，$BMNR 表现确实惨烈。从软件到加密货币，市场绝大多数板块都大幅下跌。 像 $HIMS 或 $HOOD 这样的金融科技(FinX)概念股也在暴跌。 目前全靠人工智能(AI)板块在支撑市场。
英文原文
@moninvestor Yeah $BMNR is rough. The vast majority of the market from software to crypto are down heavily. Lot of FinX names like $HIMS or $HOOD are cratering too. It’s just AI carrying the market right now
-
博主分享日内交易获利案例，因账户规模扩大停止晒单。
不，只是用于日内交易的头寸。例如，我隔夜买入因下跌5%的$ORCL，并在盘前上涨4%时卖出，在一两个小时内获得了9%的收益。我对许多不同的股票重复进行这种操作。不幸的是，我的账户规模变得太大，所以我不再发布交易记录，只发布更多分析性和论点性的内容。
英文原文
Nope, just shares for day trades. For example bought $ORCL overnight the 5% drop and sold on the 4% rise premarket for a 9% gain in an hour or two. I just do this with a lot of different stocks and repeat. Unfortunately my account got too big so I don’t post trades anymore, just more analytical things and thesis posts
-
祝贺粉丝年初至今收益30%
@Ren_aramb 恭喜，年初至今(YTD)收益30%太惊人了。我们才刚过一个月！
英文原文
@Ren_aramb Congrats, 30% YTD is incredible. We’re only 1 month in!
-
博主分享1月份至今145%的收益率表现。
@KawzInvests 1月份至今涨幅145% https://t.co/pZ9roJ0pZv
英文原文
@KawzInvests 145% so far in Jan https://t.co/pZ9roJ0pZv
-
探讨日内交易频率的适度界限。
多少日内交易才算过多？ https://t.co/FYRZFCwL4I
英文原文
How much day trading is considered too much? https://t.co/FYRZFCwL4I
-
回复指出数据来源为Macrotrends。
@adenois 数据来源为 Macrotrends https://t.co/VoeNvCy2zB
英文原文
@adenois Source was Macrotrends https://t.co/VoeNvCy2zB
-
对比TER盘后大涨与SNDK表现平淡
@jukan05 哇，$TER 盘后涨幅超 19%。 不过对于 $SNDK 来说这只是平常的一天 https://t.co/Gu27gjquEi
英文原文
@jukan05 Wow, 19%+ AH on $TER. Just a normal day for $SNDK though https://t.co/Gu27gjquEi
-
澄清标准化数据与一次性计算导致的报告差异
@adenois 正如我提到的，经标准化调整后，其平均值更接近 10 亿美元。但 2025 年的报告数据为 25.4 亿美元，这很可能是由于一次性计算所致。
英文原文
@adenois Normalized, it’s closer to $1B on average, which I mentioned. But reports for 2025 were $2.54B likely due to one time calculations https://t.co/tEPNctm0ZH
-
SNAP基本面优秀，但高股权激励导致借债回购并产生利息，逻辑荒谬。
@SVBriskmanager $SNAP 本质上是一家极具前景的公司。但数十亿美元的股票薪酬(Stock Based Compensation) -> 借债回购股票 -> 陷入债务 -> 尽管自由现金流(FCF)本身盈利，却还要支付利息，这简直荒谬。
英文原文
@SVBriskmanager $SNAP is fundamentally an extremely promising company. But the billions in stock based compensation -> taking out debt to buy that back -> going into debt -> paying interest on that debt despite having otherwise having profitable FCF Is just ridiculous.