全部推文
共 6413 条 · 第 119 / 214 页 · 滚到底自动加载更多
-
期权交易受价差、入场点及IV影响，且远期合约定价异常。
是的，这很大程度上取决于初始成交情况，因为买卖价差很宽，以及入场点（例如，如果你是在日内+1%或-1%的回调时买入），还有隐含波动率(IV)（做市商(MMs)众所周知会在开盘时抬高某些行权价的价格）。 奇怪的是，我发现2028年1月的期权链相比2027年12月的似乎略微被高估了。
英文原文
Yeah largely depends on initial fill since spreads are wide, entry points (eg. If you bought at an intraday +1% or -1% dip), and IV (MMs are known to elevate some strikes market open) I found the Jan 2028 option chain to be slightly overpriced compared to Dec 2027 one strangely enough
-
分析$XLU期权因低波动率特性，小幅波动即可带来高收益。
回复 @walteryhooper：$XLU 的 IV（隐含波动率）自2000年以来仅移动了82%（未计入股息），因此只要价格波动3%并伴随轻微的 Vega（波动率风险）扩张，收益就能轻松翻倍。 https://t.co/eCIEyAVd0F
英文原文
@walteryhooper IV for $XLU was 14% since the ETF has only moved 82% since year 2000 (not account for dividends). So a 3% movement with slight vega expansion is easily a double. https://t.co/eCIEyAVd0F
-
博主分享期权大涨144%及XLU周涨幅示例
@Ngen704 我那些极度虚值(OTM)的看涨期权已经上涨了144%+。我刚才只是以接近平值(ITM)的行权价为例，来说明 $XLU 本周3%的涨幅 https://t.co/PhgmsJDz39
英文原文
@Ngen704 My very OTM calls are up 144%+ I was just sharing closer to ITM strike as an example of the 3% increase this week for $XLU https://t.co/PhgmsJDz39
-
聚焦$GRID在美国电网现代化及降息中的机会，并澄清时间范围。
@cafeaulaitfr $GRID 是全球性的，我专注于美国电力/电网现代化与降息。此外，日期仅涵盖至今年9月，而非2028年。
英文原文
@cafeaulaitfr $GRID is global, I’m focusing on US power/grid modernization coupled with rate cuts. Also the dates only go out to September this year instead of 2028
-
看好$XLU，认为电网升级是AI时代美国工业产能的关键。
埃隆在敲响警钟，指出电力/电网对美国在AI领域的统治地位至关重要时，完全正确。 我此前对$XLU（电网/电力公用事业ETF）发出的“千载难逢”行情预测正在实时兑现。 新的看涨期权（Calls）仅在一周内就已上涨约100%+。 电力发电和电网是工业产能的衡量标准，美国有充分的动力对其进行现代化改造和扩张。
英文原文
Elon is completely right when he sounds the alarm that power/grid is vital for US dominance in AI. My call for the once in a lifetime run for $XLU (grid/power utilities ETF) is playing out real time. New calls are already up ~100%+ in the week alone. Power generation and the grid is a measurement of industrial capacity and the US has every motivation to modernize and expand it.
-
作者认为特朗普政府的举措在地缘政治上取得了最佳成果，尽管遭道德批评。
谢谢。这两个月可能会成为特朗普政府历史上最传奇但最不被欣赏的时刻之一。许多媒体和左翼政客从道德角度对此进行批评。但从经济/地缘政治主导权来看：这可能是美国在不与俄罗斯和中国发生直接冲突的情况下所能希望的最佳结果。与这两个国家的外交讨论和条约不会改变任何现状。绝大多数人完全误解了实际的意图和影响。
英文原文
Thanks. This first two months will probably be one of the most legendary but unappreciated moments of Trump’s administration. Lot of media/left wing politicians are critizing this from a moral perspective. But economically/geopolitical dominance speaking: This was the probably the single best outcome America could ever hope for without getting into any direct conflict with Russia and China. Diplomatic discussions and treaties with either countries would not have changed anything. The vast majority of people completely misinterpreted the actual intentions and implications.
-
转发提及用户，无实质内容。
@PerryPrius https://t.co/MvQRgcRLbI
英文原文
@PerryPrius https://t.co/MvQRgcRLbI
-
列举AI半导体供应链各环节代表公司及代码
@jahintanvir_ 大概包括这些： 内存 - $MU, 三星, SK海力士, 闪迪 晶圆代工, 封装 - $INTC, $TSM, $AMKR 光子学(Photonics) - $LITE, $COHR, $AAOI 专用集成电路(ASICs) - $AVGO, $MRVL 连接 - $ALAB, $CRDO 电力/电网 - $XLU 数据中心 - $NBIS, $CIFR, $WULF
英文原文
@jahintanvir_ Probably the likes of these: Memory - $MU, Samsung, SK Hynix, Sandisk Foundries, Packaging- $INTC, $TSM, $AMKR Photonics - $LITE, $COHR, $AAOI ASICs - $AVGO, $MRVL Connectivity - $ALAB, $CRDO Power/Grid- $XLU Datacenters - $NBIS, $CIFR, $WULF
-
借地缘战例证AI非泡沫，视其为摆脱阶层的关键机遇。
我不明白为什么有人会觉得 AI 是泡沫？ 美国政府凭借 $PLTR 和 Anthropic Claude 黑盒 AI 大语言模型(LLM)，在一天之内就分别摧毁了： - 委内瑞拉 - 伊朗 的领导力。 更妙的是，美国政府看起来完全依赖 Anthropic。 这似乎是一生中难得的机会，可以通过从 AI 基础设施建设和地缘政治军备竞赛中获利，从而摆脱永久的底层阶级。
英文原文
Not sure how anyone can think Ai is bubble? The US government managed to wipe out: - Venezulea - Iran leadership in a single day each because of $PLTR and Anthropic Claude black box AI LLMs. Better yet, the US government looks completely reliant on Anthropic. This seems like a once in a lifetime chance to escape the permanent underclass by profiting off the AI buildout and geopolitical arms race.
-
回复询问并分享信息来源链接
@fabknowledge 我也很好奇！这是来源 https://t.co/LSEuZf6wUh
英文原文
@fabknowledge I’m curious too! This was the source https://t.co/LSEuZf6wUh
-
AI光模块供不应求，AAOI具美国本土供应链优势。
- 即使所有人都生产 800G/1.6T 产品，供应依然不足。需求远超供应。 这并非三星/SK海力士/美光(Micron)的三巨头格局，但 $AAOI 可能是唯一来自美国本土供应链的企业，因为 $COHR 在马来西亚组装，而 $LITE 则在泰国($FN)及亚洲其他地区生产。 - 在他们的电话会议中，他们详细说明了超大规模云服务商(Hyperscalers)希望购买其能生产的所有产品。这更多是关于产能爬坡(Production Ramp)，并进一步印证了第一点：全行业需求大于供应。 我认为我们不会看到产品泛滥，因为需求将在可预见的未来消化掉各家厂商的所有产能。此外，中国厂商面临类似存储领域 cmxt/YMTC 的出口管制风险的可能性也不为零。
英文原文
- even if everyone produces 800g/1.6T there’s not enough. Demand far outstrips supply. It’s not quite the trio Samsung/sk Hynix/micron but $AAOI is probably the only one from made in America supply chains since $COHR does assembly in Malaysia and $LITE -> $FN Thailand and other places in Asia. - in their call they detailed hyperscalers wanted to buy anything they can make. It’s moreso production ramp and just drives the first point home that demand > supply across the board. Don’t think we’ll see flooding bc demand will eat up anything the players can make for the foreseeable future. And nonzero chance there’s export controls like cmxt/YMTC from memory on Chinese players
-
MRVL 依赖 MSFT Maia 放量，看好 2027 长线机会。
@Stefan_Tee8 $MRVL 高度依赖 $MSFT Maia 的放量进程，我可能会将后者作为一个重要的风向标。但我认为它在 2027 年将是极佳的长线标的，关键在于把握合适的入场时机。
英文原文
@Stefan_Tee8 $MRVL is heavily dependent on $MSFT maia ramp and i'd probably use the latter as a large indicator. But I see it being an amazing long for 2027, just need to time it properly.
-
分享$AAOI买入逻辑，看好执行落地后的巨大回报及有限下行风险。
我的首次买入价在20多美元高位到30多美元低位，所以差不多！我只记得超大规模云服务商的认证过程，并预期他们会像$ALAB那样发力。 对于$AAOI来说，关键在于执行落地，但如果他们成功了，投资回报率(ROI)将是巨大的。 即使他们错过预期40%，我认为从50亿美元市值这里下行空间也不大，所以我准备参与接下来一年的行情。
英文原文
My first buy was in the high 20s, low 30's so around the same! I just remember hyperscaler qualifcation and expected them to pull an $ALAB. Yeah name of the game is execution with $AAOI, but if they hit, the ROI is just enormous. I don't really see too much downside from $5B here even if they miss projections by 40%, so I'm in for the ride for the next year.
-
回复确认
@AI_PowerFlow 是的
英文原文
@AI_PowerFlow Yes
-
光模块供需缺口持续，2028年迎增长高峰，相关股正重定价。
我觉得这很合理。超大规模云服务商对经过认证的800G或1.6T光模块(Optical Transceivers)的需求严重超出供应，就像内存(Memory)一样，这是意料之中的。 而且现在才2026年，最大的增长加速期预计发生在2028年，这也是$LITE、$COHR等公司目前正处于重定价(Repricing)周期的主要原因。
英文原文
Seems reasonable to me. It's expected hyperscaler demand for qualified 800G or 1.6T optical transceivers severely outstrips supply like memory. And it's only 2026, biggest growth ramp is expected to happen 2028, which is the largest part of why $LITE, $COHR, and others are going through a repricing cycle right now
-
AI光模块产能瓶颈持续，云厂商订单不减，风险收益比极佳。
是的，很多人对管理层过去的问题有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。我只是觉得，如果他们能实现甚至65%的指引，风险收益比就极其不对称。此外，我认为像$AMZN这样的超大规模云服务商这次不会削减订单，因为800G/1.6T光模块确实是瓶颈，且产能缓解遥遥无期。
英文原文
Yep lot of people have PTSD from management in the past. I just felt the risk-reward was extremely asymmetrical if they deliver even 65%% of their guidance. Also I do feel like hyperscalers like $AMZN won't pull back orders this time as 800g/1.6T it's genuinely a bottleneck with no end to capacity relief in sight.
-
看好$AAOI十倍增长潜力，视其为光子学核心持仓。
$AAOI 对我来说感觉是必须配置的共封装光学(CPO)敞口。 他们的财报简直像黑魔法一样神奇。 $LITE（市值500亿美元）：2026财年预估营收约29.1亿美元 $AAOI（市值56亿美元）2027年下半年：43.5亿美元年度经常性收入(ARR)。 他们的增长预测在2026年实际上已经超越了 $LITE。 我没开玩笑。 $AAOI 的毛利率约为40%，$LITE 凭借光电路交换(OCS)垄断地位可能达到45%。 “长期毛利率目标约为40%。” 别误会，$LITE 是一只极佳的长线股，因为其在 $GOOGL TPU 和 Google 资本支出中占据8-12%的物料清单(BOM)份额... 但 $AAOI 的营收顶层增长接近去年营收的10倍，这简直不可思议。 如果你用草稿纸数学模型计算： “管理层预测，到2027年第二季度，每月光收发器营收潜力达3.78亿美元” ~ 43亿美元目标，40%毛利率（自产），17.2亿美元毛利润，也许~6亿美元资本支出/运营支出： 净利润 ~8.96亿美元。 远期市盈率（基于2027年净利润）：~6.4倍远期市盈率，对应约900%的同比增长。 而且如果你看光子学产能爬坡，预计向2030年呈指数级增长。 从他们的管理层电话会议来看，超大规模云服务商（$GOOGL, $MSFT, $AMZN）很可能买断了所有可用的光收发器产能。 这让我想起早期的 $ALAB 或 $CRDO，所有超大规模云服务商都是他们的客户。 如果你考虑到像 $SNDK 的NAND闪存那样的价格涨幅： +15% 平均售价(ASP)涨幅：14.1亿美元净利润 - （4.1倍远期市盈率） +30% 平均售价(ASP)涨幅：19.2亿美元净利润 - （3.0倍远期市盈率） 这就是为什么我在 $AAOI 财报后如此兴奋。 甚至还没包括 $AAOI “美国制造”的光收发器供应链，这将使他们获得相对于 $FN、中际旭创(Innolight)、易普联(Eptolink)等海外厂商的溢价。 有点像 $INTC 对 $TSM 或 $MU 对 SK海力士的溢价。 如果他们的预测成真，且价格涨幅使光子学板块在800%+增长下达到3倍市盈率，回报率将是天文数字。 再次强调，这些是管理层预测，执行力才是关键。 无论如何，我将 $AAOI 作为我最大的光子学持仓之一，因为这看起来像黑魔法，也是下一个 $SNDK 的开端。 如果他们能实现预测，非零概率是我们在一年半后看到其达到 $LITE 500亿美元的估值。
英文原文
$AAOI feels like must-have photonics exposure to me. Their earnings report is genuinely black magic. $LITE ($50B MC): FY 2026 est. ~$2.91B $AAOI ($5.6B MC) H2 2027: $4.35B ARR. Their growth projections literally leapfrogged $LITE for 2026. Not even kidding. Gross margins are ~40% for $AAOI, maybe 45% for $LITE with OCS monopoly. "-term objective of gross margins to around 40%," Don't get me wrong, $LITE is an amazing long due to 8-12% BOM of $GOOGL TPU and Google capex spend... But $AAOI top line growth for revenue is close to 10X revenue growth from last year's revenue, which is just insane. And if you go off napkin math modeling: "By Q2 2027, management forecasts monthly transceiver revenue potential of $378 million" ~ $4.30B target, 40% margin (in-house), $1.72B gross profit, maybe ~$600m capex/opex: Net income ~$896M. Forward P/E (on 2027 NI): ~6.4x forward p/e off ~900%-ish Y/Y growth. And if you look at photonics ramp, it's expected to increase exponentially toward 2030. From their management call hyperscalers likely ( $GOOGL, $MSFT, $AMZN ) are buying out all available capacity for transceivers. Reminds me of a early $ALAB or $CRDO where all the hyperscalers are their customers. And if you get to likely price hikes like NAND for $SNDK: +15% ASP Price Hike: $1.41B net income - (4.1x forward p/e) +30% ASP Price Hike: $1.92B net income - (3.0x forward p/e) This is why I got so excited about $AAOI post-earnings. Not even including $AAOI "Made in America" transceiver supply chains that would give them a premium where $FN, Innolight, Eptolink, and others do theirs abroad. Kinda like $INTC to $TSM or $MU to SK Hynix premiums. The ROI for this is just astronomical if they hit their projections and price hikes give them a 3 p/e rate off 800%+ growth in photonics segments. Again, these are management projections, execution is the biggest the name of the game. Regardless, I'm making $AAOI one of my largest photonics positions because this looks like black magic and the beginning of the next $SNDK. There's a nonzero chance we might see this at a $50B $LITE valuation one and a half year from now if they can execute on their projections.
-
分析IQE债务风险与重组潜力，看好AAOI非对称收益并加仓。
$IQE 因债务问题本质上具有危险性。我只是说，作为 $LITE 的已知供应商以及超大规模云服务商光子学供应链的主要贡献者，他们坐拥产能金矿。如果他们能通过出售台湾业务成功进行债务重组，我不惊讶其估值重估（re-rating）达到 1000%。这取决于你的风险偏好。$AAOI 在当前水平具有纯粹的非对称上行空间，我是重度买家。
英文原文
$IQE is inherently dangerous because of debt. I'm just saying they're sitting on a gold mine of capacity as a known $LITE supplier and large contributor to the hyperscaler photonics supply chain. If they do manage to restructure by selling off their Taiwan business wouldn't be surprised if it got re-rated like 1000%. Depends on your risk appetite. $AAOI is pure asymmetrical upside at these levels, and I'm a heavy buyer.
-
推荐关注Oxford Instruments，其为COHR/AAOI提供刻蚀沉积设备。
@Investmnt_Eagle 可以研究一下 Oxford Instruments，他们是 $COHR 和 $AAOI 在刻蚀/沉积工艺方面的知名供应商。这与 $VECO/Axtron 这类公司所做的略有不同。许多更上游的公司（如 Vital）是私有的，或者我已经提到过了。
英文原文
@Investmnt_Eagle Could look into Oxford instruments, they're a known $COHR and $AAOI supplier for etch/deposition process. Slightly different than what $VECO/Axtron type are doing. Lot of the more upstream names like Vital are private or I've already mentioned.
-
AAOI财报揭示上游设备与材料瓶颈，IQE等上游厂商受益显著。
来自 $AAOI 财报的二阶效应： -> 对 MBE/MOCVD 反应堆的需求极度旺盛。 它们用于制造外延晶圆(epiwafers)。 这为“制造”环节释放了两个信号： - $IQE 坐拥一座绝对的“金矿” - 资本开支周期将惠及类似 $VECO ($18.5亿) 和 Aixtron ($AIXXF $37亿) 这样的设备商。 引用：3-4 家超大规模云服务商，可能是 $GOOGL、$AMZN、$MSFT，对光收发器(transceivers)的需求已触顶。 -> 中际旭创(Innolight)、易普拓(Eptolink)、$COHR 等厂商可能也会经历一轮资本开支周期以满足需求。 这主要利好两家外延晶圆代工代工厂： -> $IQE ($1.75亿) ~100+ 台反应堆 -> 晶品半导体(Landmark) (~$36.8亿) ~27-30 台反应堆。 所以这大概就是为什么 $LITE 大量使用 $IQE，而 Landmark 营收屡创新高。$AAOI 则一直在建设其德州工厂的产能。 总结： 1. Aixtron 和 $VECO 受益于今年类似迷你版 $ASML 的资本开支周期。当 Aixtron 在2月指引中表示预计2026年“整体市场环境持续疲软”时，也许他们在低调隐藏实力(sandbagging)或订单尚未下达。话虽如此，我认为最佳敞口可能并非设备卖家。 2. $IQE 坐拥满足 $LITE 及其他超大规模云服务商对 InP 外延晶圆需求的产能金矿。他们只需成功重组，估值就能更像其台湾同行($36.5亿市值)。 3. $AAOI 的财报显示收发器制造商及其组装所需的组件/材料需求惊人，市场肯定尚未定价。 4. $AXTI 一如既往地成为所有环节的瓶颈，正如我去年所提到的。 名字越响亮(如 $LITE、$COHR)，交易可能越拥挤/已充分定价。 但当你向上游追溯时，还有大量未被市场定价的隐藏宝石，它们将从巨大的光子学扩张中受益。 这是投资者的新淘金热，但本质是瓶颈狩猎。
英文原文
Second order effects from $AAOI earnings: -> Extreme demand for MBE/MOCVD reactors. They're needed for epiwafers. This signals two things for "manufacturing": - $IQE is sitting on an absolute gold mine - capex cycle to ( $VECO $1.85B, Aixtron $AIXXF $3.7B) type players. Quote: 3-4 hyperscalers, likely $GOOGL, $AMZN, $MSFT. demand maxed out for transceivers. -> Innolight, Eptolink, $COHR, and others will probably go through a capex cycle to meet demand too. This largely benefits both outsourced foundries for epiwafers: -> $IQE ($175M) ~100+ reactors -> Landmark (~$3.68B) ~27-30 reactors. So that's probably the reason why $LITE has been heavily using $IQE, and Landmark has been hitting record revenues. $AAOI's has been building capacity from their texas fab. TLDR: 1. Aixtron, $VECO benefits from mini $ASML style capex cycle this year. When Aixtron said 2026 "continued softness in overall market environment expected" from feb guidance, maybe they're sandbagging or orders havent come in yet. That being said, best exposure imo is probably not the machine sellers. 2. $IQE is sitting on a gold mine of capacity to meet demand across $LITE and others hyperscalers for inp epiwafers. They just need to restructure succesfully, to be rerated more like their $3.65B friend in Taiwan. 3. $AAOI earnings is just insane demand for both transceiver makers and the components/materials required to assemble them, definitely not priced in yet. 4. $AXTI as always happens to be the bottleneck of everything as I mentioned last year. The more well known the name is ( $LITE, $COHR ) the likely more crowded/priced-in. But when you go more upstream, there's a ton of hidden gems markets haven't priced in yet that benefit from the massive photonics ramp. It's the new gold rush for investors, but bottleneck hunting.
-
付费通讯表现普遍跑输X上免费博主，建议寻找免费Alpha。
有一篇关于外部付费订阅通讯的有趣文章。 Reddit 上有人花了 9,600 美元/年订阅了前 23 位作者，并比较了他们的收益： 年初至今：Michael Burry：24 次推荐（例如 $PLTR） - 60 天平均回报 -11.1% 每年花费 415 美元，过去两个月亏损 -11%。 按 60 天平均回报排名的顶级作者： 1. Global Tech Research: +26.7% (50 次推荐) 2. SemiAnalysis: +16.7% (80 次推荐) 3. Fabricated Knowledge: +14.2% (50 次推荐) 4. Altay Capital: +13.7% (15 次推荐) 5. Doomberg: +12.6% (79 次推荐) 6. Paulo Macro: +12.1% (21 次推荐) 7. Macro Charts: +11.1% (72 次推荐) 8. The Setup Factory: +10.8% (285 次推荐) 9. The Overshoot: +9.6% (24 次推荐) 10. TicToc Trading: +8.9% (180 次推荐) 其余 12 位表现最差。垫底的是： Michael J Burry: -11.1% (24 次推荐)，每年 415 美元。 故事的寓意： 像 SemiAnalysis 这样的地方确实有真正的分析。但也许不要花几百美元去订阅那些表现远远落后的服务。 我在 X 上跟踪的大多数作者都大幅跑赢了任何付费订阅卖家。 X 上有很多免费的超额收益(alpha)。
英文原文
There was a very interesting piece on external Subscription newsletters. Someone on Reddit spent $9,600/year on the top 23 authors and compared their returns: Since the start of the year: Michael Burry: 24 calls (eg. $PLTR) - 60d avg return -11.1% for $415/Year, they lost -11% over the past 2 months. Top Authors by 60d Avg Return: 1. Global Tech Research: +26.7% (50 calls) 2. SemiAnalysis: +16.7% (80 calls) 3. Fabricated Knowledge: +14.2% (50 calls) 4. Altay Capital: +13.7% (15 calls) 5. Doomberg: +12.6% (79 calls) 6. Paulo Macro: +12.1% (21 calls) 7. Macro Charts: +11.1% (72 calls) 8. The Setup Factory: +10.8% (285 calls) 9. The Overshoot: +9.6% (24 calls) 10. TicToc Trading: +8.9% (180 calls) The other 12 were performed worst. And at the very bottom: Michael J Burry: -11.1% (24 calls) for $415/year. Moral of the story: There's genuine analysis out there from places like SemiAnalysis. But maybe don't pay hundreds of dollars for others, just to vastly underperform. Most of the authors I've been tracking on X have strongly beat any subscription sellers. A lot of the alpha is free on X.
-
博主称赞对方在AAOI、GLD和XLU上的优异表现。
@pepemoonboy 你在 $AAOI、$GLD 和 $XLU 上表现太棒了（'cooked' 指做得极好/大赚）。
英文原文
@pepemoonboy You cooked on $AAOI, $GLD, and $XLU
-
建议平台增加过滤器以自动屏蔽钓鱼链接，减少金融博主手动处理负担。
@nikitabier 你能否为创作者（或类似角色）制作一个过滤器，以自动隐藏机器人发布的外部钓鱼链接，并处理误报的审批？ 每个板块的情况不同，但在金融领域，每篇帖子都要手动处理非常烦人。
英文原文
@nikitabier Can you make a filter for creators or something similar to auto hide bot external phishing links and approvals for false positives? It’s different for each sector but for finance, it’s annoying to manually do it every post.
-
反对在高位股大跌后追涨拥挤的防御板块，建议利用散户抛售机会建仓。
不。重点是，在高贝塔(高波动性)股票如 $RDDT 或 $SOFI 下跌 30-40% 后卖出，转而重新配置到已被抢跑且处于历史新高的拥挤交易（如国防/石油）中，并不是个好主意。 就我个人而言，针对我的石油/国防对冲头寸，我正在寻找任何主要的散户抛售潮，以便在这些标的中净重新建立多头头寸。 我只是在想机构可能会做同样的事。
英文原文
No. Point was that it's not a good idea to sell high-beta like $RDDT or $SOFI after dropping 30-40% to reposition into crowded plays like defense/oil that have already been frontrun and are ATHs. For me personally with my oil/defense hedges, I'm looking for any major retail selloff to net reposition long in a lot of these names. I was just thinking institutions might do the same.
-
机构已提前交易地缘风险，高位追涨石油国防并卖出超跌资产可能是错误。
以下是我对市场的解读： 美国/以色列的政权更迭+对伊朗的打击已被机构提前交易（front-run）。 在历史高位买入国防/石油并卖出风险资产可能是一个错误，因为这本该在一个月前完成。 数据极其异常： 来自 $CVX、$XOM 和 $XLE 的石油/能源板块年初至今（YTD）上涨 22-26%。 大型国防承包商从 $NOC 到 $LMT 年初至今也增长了 27-36%。 大部分涨幅发生在1月下旬，当时情报报告称针对政权更迭的伊朗打击迫在眉睫。 作为参考： - $LMT 一年回报率为 46.12%。洛克希德仅在最近一到两个月内就获得了大部分收益（32.39%）。 这可能与1万亿美元的国防预算有关，但最大的信号是 $CVX、$XLE 和原油因预期中东局势中断而大幅上涨。 伊朗局势与委内瑞拉完全不同，当时所有人都措手不及。 在委内瑞拉事件中，交易者和机构处于同等地位，像 Gold Reserve 这样的公司当日跳空上涨 100%。 但在伊朗事件中，这可能是历史上最“预告”充分的攻击之一，大多数机构已经重新配置完毕（因此高贝塔资产大幅抛售，石油/国防在过去一个月上涨）。 因此，在现有“高风险”资产已经处于低位时卖出，转而配置到已被机构提前交易、经历异常一个月20%+涨幅后处于历史高位的石油和其他国防承包商，可能是一个错误。 预计大多数散户会这样做，并在流动性不足的时段引发波动（但在这种情况下，反向操作可能会带来更高回报） 我可能错了，但就我个人而言，我已在事件发生前用国防和石油进行了对冲。 我的许多对冲收益异常丰厚，我计划将这些资金轮动到高贝塔资产发生的任何主要抛售中。 我的思路是，机构很可能也会这样做。 TLDR：在高风险资产已经抛售之后，将其轮动到已被机构提前交易且处于历史高位的石油/国防，可能不是最好的主意。
英文原文
Here's my read on the market: The US/Israel Regime Change + Strike on Iran has already been front-run by institutions. Buying Defense/Oil at ATHs and selling risk-assets may be a mistake, as it should have been done a month ago. The data is extremely abnormal: Oil/Energy from $CVX, $XOM, and $XLE are all up 22-26% YTD. Large defense contractors from $NOC to $LMT also have increased 27-36% YTD. Majority of the run happening late January, when intelligence reported a strike on Iran was imminent targeting regime change. For reference: - $LMT 1 Year return is 46.12%. Lockheed made majority of its gains (32.39%) in the past month-two alone. It's likely multifaceted with the $1T defense budget, but the biggest tell was the massive run-up in oil like $CVX, $XLE, and crude oil expecting disruption in the middle east. The Iran situation is completely different from Venezulea, where everyone was caught off guard. With Venezulea traders and institutions were on equal footing as companies like Gold Reserve gapped up 100% same-day. But with Iran, it was probably one of the most telegraphed attacks in history and most institutions have already completely re-positioned (hence the major sell-off in high beta and oil/defense going up over the past month). So selling existing "high-risk" assets when they're already at lows to reposition into, oil, and other defense contractors at ATHs after an abnormal 1M 20%+ rally might be a mistake. Majority of other retail is expected to do this and cause some volatility during illiquid hours (but in these cases, doing the opposite might lead to higher returns) I could be wrong, but for me personally, I've already hedged with defense and oil leading up to the event. Many of my hedges are up abnormal amounts, and I was planning on rotating those into any major selloffs that happen in high beta assets. And my thought process was, institutions would likely do the same. TLDR: Rotating your high-beta assets after they've already sold off into oil/defense at ATHs that have already been frontrun by institutions, might not be the best idea.
-
能源与国防股涨幅已大，机构或借消息出货，暂不追高。
石油/能源板块上涨25%极为罕见。（1年回报率约25%）因此它在短短两个月内就已实现了全部收益。大型国防股也是如此，因此大多数机构已大幅调整仓位。因此，过去一个月大多数因素已基本被定价，随着散户反应性买入，机构可能会借消息出货。但我确信它们可能还会再涨一点。否则，我不太确定现在是否应该追高。需要先观察打击行动的影响及后续反应。
英文原文
Oil/energy sector going up 25% is extremely rare. (1Y return ~25%) so it already made up the entire return in just two months. Same with large defense stocks, so most institutions have largely repositioned. So most things have already largely been priced in over the last month and institutions might be selling into the news as people reactively buy. But I’m sure they might go up a tad further. Otherwise so I’m not too sure about chasing now. Will need to see impact and response of the strikes first
-
对比委内瑞拉与伊朗事件的市场反应，质疑散户错失机会的说法。
委内瑞拉的接管对大多数人来说 largely 是个意外（因为此前主要是封锁）。这就是为什么交易员能够像机构一样，在受益股如 Gold Reserve（跳空高开100%+）和 $CVX 上赚取巨额利润。而在伊朗问题上，机构/交易员早已提前重新配置仓位，大多数情况已被定价。但我预计随着事件落地，仍会出现波动。至于 X 上的散户投资者是从哪里得到“他们错过了这次机会”的消息，我不太明白。
英文原文
The Venezuela takeover was largely a surprise to everyone (as it was mainly a blockade before). Hence why traders were able to make enormous profits on beneficiaries like Gold Reserve (gap up 100%+) and $CVX at the same time as institutions. With Iran, institutions/traders have already re-positioned well ahead of time and most things have already been priced in. But I do expect volatility given the event has been realized. Yeah not sure where retail investors on X are getting their news that they missed this.
-
机构已提前布局地缘风险，散户恐慌波动将被机构利用。
过去一个月的新闻：“与伊朗的战争迫在眉睫”。 X 上的散户：“没人预料到会发生这种事！现在是恐慌的时候！” 是的，很多因素已经被计入价格，例如能源 ETF $XLE（年初至今上涨 25%）或 $NOC（年初至今上涨 27%），这些表现异常。 预计散户会出现大量波动，但机构/交易员（大多已重新调整仓位）将利用这一点。
英文原文
News for the last month: "War with Iran is Imminent" Retail on X: "Nobody expected this to happen! Everyone time to panic!" So yes a lot of it has been priced in with Energy ETFs $XLE (up 25% YTD) or $NOC (up 27% YTD), which have been abnormal. Expect a lot of retail volatility, but institutions/traders (who have largely already re-positioned) will use this to their advantage.
-
机构利用情报优势提前布局地缘政治风险，带动能源及军工股上涨。
你意识到当情报/新闻在过去几周说“战争迫在眉睫”时，机构可能会采取不同的头寸布局吗？ 如果连散户都能提前对冲，那么鉴于伊朗周边的军事集结，我确信机构肯定早已预见。你可以从 $CVX 和部分国防承包商（Defense Contractors）的上涨中看到这一点。 他们拥有更多情报，如卫星图像和政府内部的消息。
英文原文
You do realize when intel/news says “War is Imminent”, for the past few weeks… institutions probably position differently? If even retail is are able to hedge ahead of time, then I’m sure institutions definitely saw it coming given military buildup around Iran. And you’re able to see that with $CVX and bit defense contractors all rising. They have more intel like satellite imagery and word of mouth info with the gov.
-
经验法则：非本土战争短期波动后市场上涨。
@HeinzelAI 没有哪场战争是普通的战争。经验法则总体成立：只要战火不烧到本土，市场在经历短期波动后都会上涨。
英文原文
@HeinzelAI No war is an ordinary war. Rule of thumb holds up as a whole that as long as it’s not on domestic territory, markets go up after near term volatility.