全部推文
共 6765 条 · 第 119 / 226 页 · 滚到底自动加载更多
-
HIMS估值核心在于其DTC分销网络，类比HOOD的规模化效应。
是的，围绕 $HIMS 销售的个别产品存在大量看空/看多案例的讨论。 我认为分析师/市场的方法错了： 我认为 $HIMS 的主要估值来源于其通过最近3次收购建立的独特全球零售直接面向消费者(DTC)分销网络。 这解锁了大量潜在收入流+变现机会，就像 $HOOD 为金融行业规模化所做的那样。
英文原文
Yes there's a lot of bear/bull case discussion around individual products $HIMS sells. I think analysts/markets are approaching it wrong: $HIMS main valuation I see is derived from their unique global retail DTC distribution network that they now have with their 3 recent acquisitions. This unlocks a lot of latent revenue stream + monetization, like what $HOOD did for the financial industry to scale.
-
从分销网络和零售捕获角度评估HIMS估值。
@RawlJohns 我纯粹是从他们的分销网络(Distribution Network) + 零售捕获(Retail Capture)角度来看待 $HIMS 的估值。并不是看他们销售的单颗药丸，所以不太确定。
英文原文
@RawlJohns I'm purely looking at $HIMS valuation from their distribution network + retail capture angle. Not the individual pills they sell, so not sure.
-
类比META和HOOD，看好HIMS全球DTC网络变现潜力。
难道没人看到 $HIMS、$META 和 $HOOD 之间的相似之处吗？ $HIMS 真的刚刚收购了全球最大的几家竞争对手： - Zava（欧洲/英国） - Livewell（加拿大） - Eucalyptus（澳大利亚/日本） 而且没有被反垄断阻止？ $META 十年前收购 WhatsApp 和 Instagram 这类公司时，也是几乎没有遇到阻力。 如今，由于 $META 最终成为万亿美元级垄断企业后留下的监管 PTSD，社交媒体公司已经不能再四处大举收购。 而 $HIMS 在这一轮并购之后，已经成为全球最大的独立零售 DTC（直接面向消费者）分销网络。 现在它只需要弄清楚，如何像 $HOOD 面向金融产品那样做交叉销售？ $HOOD 此前也遇到过 SEC 和 Gary 试图阻止其所有加密产品的情况。但自从监管麻烦清除后，他们通过向零售用户交叉销售金融科技产品，成功扩张成了一家700亿美元公司。 我看到了 $NVO / 监管机构试图阻止 $HIMS 产品供应之间的强烈相似之处。 不过，在 $NVO 与 $HIMS 达成合作、FDA 也撤回威胁后，这种监管不确定性已经消除。潜力是存在的？ 我不可能是唯一一个看到 $HIMS 全球 DTC 零售分销网络及其潜在收入变现机会的人吧？
英文原文
Does nobody else see the parallels to $HIMS and $META and $HOOD? $HIMS literally just bought out the largest players around the world: - Zava (Europe/UK) - Livewell (Canada) - Eucalyptus (Australia/Japan) Without antitrust blocking it? $META did that a decade ago with companies like WhatsApp and Instagram with minimal friction. Now no social media company anymore can go on buying sprees due to regulator PTSD after $META ended up a trillion dollar monopoly. $HIMS now is the largest independent global retail DTC distribution network in the world, after their M&A spree. And just needs to figure out how to cross-sell products like what $HOOD did for financial products? $HOOD previously had the SEC + Gary trying to block all their crypto offerings. But ever since they got regulatory headaches cleared up, they managed to scale to become a $70B company off cross-selling fintech products to their retail audience. I'm seeing strong parallels to $NVO / Regulators trying to block $HIMS product offerings. However, that regulatory uncertainty is now cleared up after $NVO partnered with $HIMS and FDA dropped their threats. The potential is there? I can't be the only one who sees potential from $HIMS global DTC retail distribution network and latent revenue monetization?
-
赞赏投资者打破思维定势，克服路径依赖以追求更高回报。
真心赞赏你愿意打开心态。我最初加入 X 时看到的许多 FinX 投资者，尽管市场格局已发生诸多变化或存在高估，其持仓组合仍停留在 $PLTR、$HOOD、$IREN、$AMD 这类股票上。审视其他趋势，并换掉持有了一段时间的股票以追求更好的回报，这比预期中要难得多。
英文原文
Honestly applaud you for opening up your mindset. A lot of the FinX investors I've originally seen when I first joined X still have the same $PLTR, $HOOD, $IREN, $AMD type portfolios, despite a lot of shifts or overvaluation. It's a lot harder than expected to look at other trends and change your stock that you held for awhile to chase better returns.
-
分析$HIMS收购潜力及变现依赖管理层执行力
真是出色的分析！我没想到自己会站出来为 $HIMS 辩护，但他们确实成功收购了以下企业：Zava（欧洲/英国）、Livewell（加拿大）、Eucalyptus（澳大利亚/日本）。他们还建立了全球最大规模的医疗保健零售客户网络（retail capture），且未受到联邦贸易委员会(FTC)或监管机构的制裁。这种潜力让人想起 $META 收购 WhatsApp 及其他平台的时期，并结合了 $HOOD 交叉销售(cross-selling)新功能的策略。最终，如何从这个巨大的分销网络中变现，完全取决于管理层的执行力。
英文原文
정말 훌륭한 분석입니다! 제가 나서서 $HIMS 를 옹호하게 될 줄은 개인적으로 꿈에도 몰랐지만, 그들은 실제로 다음 기업들을 인수하는 데 성공했습니다: Zava (유럽/영국) Livewell (캐나다) Eucalyptus (호주/일본) 그리고 세계 최대 규모의 헬스케어 리테일 고객 네트워크(retail capture)를 구축해 냈습니다. 이 모든 것을 FTC나 규제 당국의 제재 없이 해냈죠. 이런 잠재력을 보면 과거 $META 가 WhatsApp과 기타 플랫폼들을 인수했던 때가 확실히 떠오릅니다. 여기에 $HOOD 가 새로운 기능들을 교차 판매(cross-selling)했던 전략이 결합된 모습입니다. 결국, 이 거대한 유통 네트워크를 어떻게 수익화할지 그 방법을 찾아내는 것은 전적으로 경영진의 실행력에 달려 있습니다.
-
看好$HIMS全球并购后的规模及分销优势，类比$META和$HOOD。
不太是吧？Ro 只在美国。$HIMS 在完成对其他全球重量级玩家的一轮并购后，规模要大得多。 这个全球分销网络没有因为反垄断被阻止，这让我看好 $HIMS，因为我看到了十年前 $META 收购潮的相似之处，也看到了 $HOOD 通过交叉销售变现零售用户的能力。
英文原文
Not really? Ro is US only. $HIMS is much larger in scale after their M&A spree of all the other global heavyweights. That global distribution network without any of them getting blocked by antitrust makes me bullish on $HIMS because I see parallels to $META's acquisition spree a decade ago + $HOOD's capacity to monetize retail audience through cross-selling.
-
博主调侃并欢迎粉丝转向半导体资本支出瓶颈投资。
@pepemoonboy 哈哈，你什么时候变成了 $AMKR、$ONTO 等股票的半导体资本支出(Capex)瓶颈投资者？真没想到。我喜欢这种思维转变，欢迎加入。
英文原文
@pepemoonboy LOL when did you become a semi capex bottleneck investor in $AMKR, $ONTO, and others? Was not expecting it. I love the mindset shift, welcome aboard.
-
区分网络效应与资金/服务粘性，解析RDDT、HOOD及HIMS的护城河差异。
这不是网络效应。 像 $RDDT 这样的社交媒体具有网络效应，这就是为什么你不能在一天内用 vibe coding 复制 Reddit 并指望人们使用它。 $HOOD 具有高粘性，因为用户的资金在那里，且难以转出。 $HIMS 具有高粘性，因为更换医疗服务提供商很困难。
英文原文
It's not a network effect. Social media like $RDDT has a network effect, which is why you can't vibe code Reddit in a day and expect people to use it. $HOOD is sticky because people have their money there and it's difficult to transfer off. $HIMS is sticky because it's difficult to switch medical providers.
-
类比Meta，看好HIMS全球并购后的变现潜力
完全同意，我看到 $HIMS 与 $META 十年前收购所有社交媒体公司的平行之处。 这在今天行不通，因为联邦贸易委员会(FTC)会阻止像 $RDDT 这样的公司收购其竞争对手如 $SNAP。 但 $HIMS 完成了一轮全球并购(M&A)热潮，通过收购欧洲的 Zava、加拿大的 Livewell 以及面向澳大利亚/日本的 Eucalyptus，建立了零售医疗分发的垄断护城河。 因此，既然 $HIMS 设法建立了全球零售医疗用户基础……随着监管问题得到解决，存在巨大的潜在收入变现潜力。
英文原文
Absolutely, I see the $HIMS parallel to $META acquiring all the social media companies a decade ago. This wouldn't work today since FTC would block companies like $RDDT acquiring all their competitors like $SNAP. But $HIMS pulled off a global M&A spree, building a monopoly moat over retail healthcare distribution from Zava in Europe, Livewell in Canada, and Eucalyptus for Australia/Japan. So, now that $HIMS somehow managed to build capture the global retail base for healthcare... With regulatory issues cleared up, there's a lot of latent revenue monetization potential.
-
HIMS价值源于分销网络，且成功完成全球DTC并购。
@iraw000 我的观点是，$HIMS 的价值源于其分销网络，类似于 $AMZN 的配送体系，而非其销售的商品（如电脑、书籍）。此外，他们成功在全球范围内收购了主要的医疗 DTC（直接面向消费者）公司，且未遭遇监管阻碍。
英文原文
@iraw000 My argument is that $HIMS value is derived from their distribution network like $AMZN delivery. Not by the drugs they sell (eg. computers, books). And they managed to acquire the major healthcare DTC companies globally without getting blocked.
-
HIMS的DTC分销网络是核心护城河，监管风险已解除，上行空间明确。
你刚才是不是直接跳过了整篇帖子？ 网络捕获能力和面向大众市场的零售分销网络才是 $HIMS 的护城河，而不是他们销售的药丸。 而且这条护城河非常深厚。对于潜在的变现流而言，这一点怎么强调都不为过。 例如 $HOOD 通过交叉销售新产品。 $HIMS 确实是首个在医疗领域达到这种规模的直接面向消费者(DTC)的企业。就像 $HOOD 在18美元时一样，总会有看空的情况。 $HIMS 的上行空间显而易见，且他们主要的监管问题已于上周五解决。 现在的关键在于他们能否找到新的变现途径。
英文原文
Did you just skip over the entire post? Network capture and retail distribution network at masses is $HIMS moat, not the pills they sell. And that moat is massive. This cannot be understated for latent monetization streams. eg. $HOOD with cross-selling new products. $HIMS is genuinely the first of its kind to reach this sort of scale DTC for healthcare. And there's always going to be bear cases like with $HOOD with $18. The upside is clearly there with $HIMS and all their main regulatory problems were cleared last Friday. It's more of whether or not they can figure out new monetization avenues.
-
诺华合作撤诉消除$HIMS法律风险，基本面发生巨大转变。
是的，40%的SI（短期兴趣）此前是合理的。 在$NVO（诺华）达成合作并撤销诉讼之前，我对$HIMS也持看跌态度，这为$HIMS带来了收入流扩张和更明确的监管前景。 该诉讼曾威胁其整个资产负债表+收入增长+全球扩张，因此空头大量做空是合理的。 然而，上周五$HIMS的法律纠纷在一天内全部消失，这是十年来最大的惊喜。 这是一个巨大的基本面转变。
英文原文
Yes the 40% SI made sense earlier. I was bearish on $HIMS too until $NVO partnered up + dropped the lawsuit, giving $HIMS revenue stream expansion and more regulatory clarity. The lawsuit was threatening their entire balance sheet + revenue growth + global expansion, so it made sense why short sellers piled on. However, it was the biggest surprise of the decade last Friday when $HIMS's legal drama all vanished in a day. This is a massive fundamental shift.
-
回顾HOOD监管解禁后解锁新收入流，类比HIMS前景。
事后诸葛亮。 当我在 $16 时做多 $HOOD 时，我意识到他们也可以通过加密货币(Crypto)和其他方式扩张。 然而，分析师们给出的 $HOOD 目标价仅为 $8-12，因为他们看不到其他收入流的变现能力。 这与 $HIMS 面临 GLP + $NVO 诉讼的情况类似，Gary Gensler 回归后，SEC 也试图阻止其新的加密货币产品，并最终起诉了 $HOOD。 然而，自从他们解决了这一监管问题后： 他们现在解锁了许多新的收入流，而加密货币是其中最大的一块。 我确实看到了 $NVO 和美国政府现在给 $HIMS 绿灯之间的相似之处。 金融科技/券商认为他们无法“轻松交叉销售”，但 $HOOD 成功打破了这一范式。 我不知道 $HIMS 是否也能做到，但我们会见分晓。
英文原文
Hindsight 20/20. When I was long $HOOD back at $16, I realized they could expand via Crypto and other methods too. However, analysts were all giving Robinhood $8-12 PTs because they didn't see capacity for monetization of other revenue streams. Similar to $HIMS with GLP + $NVO lawsuits, Gary Gensler back + SEC were also tried blocking their new crypto products and ended up suing $HOOD. However, ever since they cleared up that regulatory issue: They've now unlocked many new revenue streams and crypto is one of the biggest ones. I do see parallels with $NVO and US Gov now giving $HIMS the green light. Fintech/Brokerages thought they couldn't "cross-sell easily" but $HOOD managed to break that paradigm. IDK if $HIMS can do it too but we'll find out.
-
分析$HIMS全球用户变现潜力，类比$HOOD/$META，建议做多。
感觉大家没有正确阐述 $HIMS 的多头逻辑： 这是我的观点。 $HIMS 的主要护城河是零售受众的网络捕获。 而多头逻辑在于潜在收入的货币化。 $HOOD 在 2025 年的金融科技领域实现了同样的效果。 $META（完全成熟后）在过去十年的社交媒体领域也实现了同样的效果。 $HIMS 现在正处于 2026 年的起点。 但鉴于 Zava + Eucalyptus 带来了全球（欧洲、澳大利亚、日本、加拿大）数百万新用户： $HIMS 现在在医疗领域拥有了独一无二的零售受众捕获能力。 然而，与市值约 700 亿美元的 Robinhood 和 1.6 万亿美元的 $META 巨头不同的是： 它们已经通过利润率优化和新收入流成功货币化了其零售受众。 而且非常激进。$HIMS 尚未做到。 Robinhood 通过推出银行/信用卡/预测市场等新产品做到了这一点。 现在这些新产品各自独立产生超过 1 亿美元的新收入流。 $META 通过收购 WhatsApp/Instagram 后最大化捕获每用户收入做到了这一点。 然而，$HIMS 尚未像在美国那样（例如睾酮疗法）获得同样的机会。部分原因是之前的诉讼。 现在这些障碍已清除，多头逻辑再次显现： 与其建模 Zava/Eucalyptus 传统带来的收入，重要的是关注通过人数实现的零售网络捕获。 因为这是最大的潜在收入来源 + 未被定价的收入预测超预期。 现在，十亿美元的问题是： $HIMS 最终会像 $HOOD 吗？ $HIMS 现在拥有医疗领域最大的零售网络 + 分销渠道之一。 然而，与金融科技或社交媒体渠道相比，医疗领域的交叉销售似乎更难。 它最终是成为 3000 亿美元公司还是 500 亿美元公司，取决于管理层能否解决这一问题。 因此，对于旁观者来说，如果 $HIMS 能够设法从新的全球用户群中实现潜在收入扩张，再次做多可能值得。~40%+ 的做空比例和新的 $NVO 合作也是巨大的加分项。
英文原文
Feels like people aren't articulating the bull case for $HIMS correctly: Here's my view. The main moat of $HIMS is network capture of retail audiences. And the bull case is latent revenue monetization. $HOOD achieved that same effect in fintech over 2025. $META (fully grown) achieved that same effect in the social media sector over the past decade. $HIMS is now at the starting point in 2026. But given millions of new users across the globe (Europe, Australia, Japan, Canada) from Zava + Eucalyptus: $HIMS now has that one-of-a-kind retail audience capture in the healthcare sector. However, the difference between ~$70B companies in Robinhood and $1.6T giants in $META is that: They've already successfully monetized their retail audiences both through margin optimization, and new revenue streams. And very aggressively. $HIMS has not yet. Robinhood did so by pushing new products from banking/credit cards/prediction markets/etc. And they are all now independently generating $100m+ each as new revenue streams. $META did so by capturing the maximum amount of revenue per user after acquiring WhatsApp/Instagram. However, $HIMS has not gotten the chance to yet in the same way they did with the US (eg. Testosterone). Especially partially due to former lawsuits. Now that's cleared up, the bull case can be seen again: Instead of modeling what revenue Zava/Eucalyptus traditionally brought, the important thing to look at is retail network capture through # of people. As this is biggest source of latent revenue + revenue projection beats not priced in. Now, the billion dollar question is: Will $HIMS end up like $HOOD? $HIMS now has the one of the largest retail networks + distribution for healthcare. However, cross-selling seems much harder in healthcare vs. fintech or social media channels. The answer whether it ends up a $30B company or a $5B one is up for management to figure out. So for people on the sideline, it might be worth flipping long again in the off-chance $HIMS manages to figure out latent revenue expansion from their new global userbase. The ~40%+ short interest and the new $NVO partnership serves as a huge bonus as well.
-
RDDT基本面强劲，虽波动集中需耐心，无需成邪教股亦能大涨。
谢谢夸奖我帅。别觉得 $RDDT 必须像 $IREN 或 $ASTS 那样成为“邪教股”才能上涨 50%+。基本面理应自证价值！与其他标的相比，它一年中大部分行情集中在几天内完成，所以需要一些耐心。
英文原文
I appreciate being called handsome, thank you. Don’t think $RDDT needs to end up as a cult stock like $IREN or $ASTS for it to go up 50%+. As fundamentals should speak for itself! It does make most of its moves in just a few days out of the year compared to other names, so requires some patience.
-
调侃今日市场剧烈反转，戏称牛顿第四定律应关于吉姆·克莱默。
@Test126863 今天的反转太疯狂了。牛顿第四定律本该是关于吉姆·克莱默(Jim Cramer)的。
英文原文
@Test126863 Today’s reversal was wild. Newton’s fourth law should have been about Jim Cramer.
-
感谢互动并建议沿途锁定90%的期权利润
@StephenEllis_PR 我很乐意喝杯啤酒，谢谢。这比我当初选的行权价要虚值(OTM)得多，但好在奏效了！ 记得沿途锁定利润，90%的涨幅已经相当可观了哈哈
英文原文
@StephenEllis_PR I’ll gladly take a beer thanks. That’s way more OTM than the strikes I picked, but at least it worked! Make sure to take profits along the way, 90% gain is already quite a bit lol
-
展示做空原油逻辑下$JETS期权3小时内的盈利表现。
才过了3个小时，$JETS 的交易就涨了不少，哈哈。 隐含波动率(IV)为25%的情况下，实现了5.35%的波段收益。 永远要相信你的吉姆·克拉默(Jim Cramer)、X散户以及Wallstreetbet指标。
英文原文
It’s only been 3 hours and the $JETS trade is up a lot LOL. 5.35% swing off 25% IV. Always trust in your Jim Cramer, X retail, and Wallstreetbet indicators. https://t.co/38poYZZRA0
-
博主嘲讽针对 $CRCL 的随意技术分析预测。
@kledisonff10497 是的，关于 $CRCL 的这条尤其可笑。画几条随机的线，然后得出结论说它会涨到 25 美元 https://t.co/A8kXlyXtBz
英文原文
@kledisonff10497 Yeah, this one was especially funny for $CRCL. Draws some random lines and then concludes it’s going to $25 https://t.co/A8kXlyXtBz
-
Reddit被极度低估，Q1数据超预期，是强买入标的。
同意，实际上确实有一些净经营亏损结转(NOL carry forwards)，但即使你将其建模推演至几年后。 $RDDT 相对于其增长和盈利能力而言被极度低估。 而且我认为战时状态实际上推高了2026年第一季度的参与度指标/营收数据，使其超出预期。 人们只看图表，觉得下跌很难看，但Reddit是我目前最强的买入标的。
英文原文
Agreed, there’s actually some net operating loss carry forwards but even if you model that out a few years from now. $RDDT is insanely undervalued relative to growth and profitability. And I think wartime actually boosted 2026 q1 engagement metrics/revenue numbers past expectations. People just look at the chart and think the drop is ugly, but Reddit is of the strongest buys for me right now.
-
回顾 $CRCL 一个月翻倍，强调应关注基本面而非图表。
$CRCL 现在到了 109 美元。 Circle 自从我在 54 美元发帖以来，涨幅已超过 100% 至 109 美元…… 那是一个月前的事了。 我真的很喜欢回头看那些看跌的评论，声称它会“下跌 50%”或“图表看起来很丑”，所以最终会跌至 20 美元。 当 $CRCL 在 50 美元时，X 上的所有人都在看跌，但现在它回到 100 美元，人们又转为看多了。 市场是判断对错的最终仲裁者。 但最大的教训是：关注基本面，而不是图表。
英文原文
$CRCL is now at $109. Circle has increased more than 100% to $109... Since my post at $54. This was 1 month ago. I really love going back and seeing all the bearish comments claiming it would "Go down"50%" or "chart looks ugly" so it ends up at $20. Everyone on X was bearish on $CRCL at $50, but now that it's back at $100, people are bullish again. The market is the final arbiter of right and wrong. But the biggest lesson: Look at underlying fundamentals, not the chart.
-
质疑对方关于战时导致流量创纪录的说法。
@KleinTom26945 这篇帖子的全部内容不都是在说“战时”导致了创纪录的流量/参与度吗？
英文原文
@KleinTom26945 This whole post was about Wartime leading to record traffic/engagement?
-
因$RDDT隐含波动率高，博主偏好直接持有正股。
@tristanfinazzo $RDDT 的隐含波动率(Implicit Volatility, IV)很高，所以我个人更倾向于只持有正股。
英文原文
@tristanfinazzo $RDDT is high IV so I personally prefer just shares only.
-
伊朗冲突利好Reddit，市场定价错误
仅持股。我查看了 Elon 关于 X 平台连续创纪录参与度的帖子： -> 委内瑞拉：创纪录参与度 -> 伊朗：参与度再创新高。 同时我也关注了关于 $PINS / $META 看空论点的评论，即广告商因时间线问题而减少支出。 但 $RDDT 或许是极少数能因战争期间用户参与度/流量激增而获得隔离效应+受益的社交媒体公司之一。 因此我认为伊朗冲突对 Reddit 整体利好，而市场定价错误。
英文原文
Shares only. I was looking Elon's posts about X having record engagement back to back: -> Venezuela: Record engagement -> Iran: Even higher record engagement. And was looking at other comments around $PINS / $META bear case indicators of advertisers pulling spend due to timelines. But $RDDT is perhaps the one of the only few social media companies that has isolation + benefits from a massive spike of user engagement/traffic during war. Hence why I think the conflict in Iran is net bullish for Reddit and markets are pricing it wrong.
-
战时流量激增且广告隔离，$RDDT 下季业绩有望大幅超预期。
Reddit ($RDDT) 实际上看起来： 在战时异常看涨。 我的论点是，他们很可能会大幅超出下一个季度的盈利预期。 以下是市场忽略的内容： 1. 战时极端的用户参与度。 重大实时事件期间的两大西方平台：X 和 $RDDT。 像 $PINS 这样的公司可能不会从战争带来的参与度增加中受益，$META 可能仅受益于一小部分增长。 但所有人都涌向 Reddit 和 X。 -> 在全球危机期间，数百万焦急、高意图的搜索查询将人们从 Google 引向 Reddit。 -> 以及对正在发生的事件的直接讨论流量，导致更长的参与度 + 广告展示 + 总体流量。 Elon Musk / X 确认在伊朗冲突初期 X 平台的使用量创纪录。 并确认在委内瑞拉冲突期间参与度创纪录。 Reddit 的情况可能也是如此。 许多数据本月未公开（例如 Similarweb 估算），但我有高度信心，Reddit 在此期间也实现了创纪录的参与度。 委内瑞拉冲突可能导致了短期的活动爆发，但伊朗冲突持续时间较长，是十年来最大的冲突之一。 2. 广告主的避险情绪 通常的观点是 $META 和 X 拥有峰值参与度，但广告主在战时会撤下广告。 特别是因为 $META 和 X 可能在同一个信息流中展示伊朗冲突 + 金融等不同事件的巨大时间线： 然而： $RDDT 是最独特的社交媒体平台之一，因为其 subreddit 是隔离的。 /r/leagueoflegends 或 /r/wallstreetbets 的内容与 /r/iran 和 /r/worldnews 是隔离的。 3. Reddit 保守估计盈利 2026 年 Q1 营收指引 5.95-6.05 亿美元于 2 月初发布，此时尚未受到 2 月下旬伊朗冲突引发的巨大流量异常和可能的广告预算重新分配的影响。 我预期在发布财报时，营收将大幅超出预期。 _ Reddit ($RDDT) 是一个非对称的多头头寸，实际上在战时极度看涨，这与社交媒体总体看跌的普遍假设相反。 目前尚无公开的盈利历史来证明这一点（因为 Reddit 在乌克兰冲突期间尚未上市）。 但我的 alpha/论点是前所未有的： 我们将看到 Reddit 成为战时少数看涨的社交媒体平台之一。 我们将通过其财报来验证这一点是否属实。
英文原文
Reddit ( $RDDT ) in fact looks: Exceptionally Bullish during War. My thesis is that they will likely blow away next quarter earnings expectations. Here's what the market missed: 1. Extreme User Engagement during Wartime. The major two Western outlets during live events: X and $RDDT. Companies like $PINS likely do not benefit from increased engagement from War and $META may benefit from a tiny uptick. But everyone flocks to Reddit and X. -> During a global crisis, millions of frantic, high-intent search queries lead people to Reddit from Google. -> As well as direct traffic from discussion on what's going on, leading to longer-engagement + ad views + traffic in general. Elon Musk / X confirmed record usage of the X platform during the initial conflict with Iran. And confirmed record engagement during the conlifct with Venezuela. This is likely the same with Reddit. A lot of this data is not public this month (eg. Similarweb estimates), but it's high confidence, both Reddit also achieved record engagement during this time. The Venezuela conflict may have led to a short burst in activity, but the Iran conflict is extended and one of the largest ones of the decade. 2. Flight to Safety from Advertisers The typical view is $META and X have peak engagement, but advertisers pull ads during war. Especially as $META and X might show massive timelines of different events from Iran conflict + Finance in one feed: However: $RDDT is one of the most unique social media platforms as they're isolated with subreddits. Things from /r/leagueoflegends or /r/wallstreetbets are isolated from /r/iran and /r/worldnews. 3. Reddit Sandbagging earnings Q1 2026 revenue guidance of $595–$605 million was issued in early February, before the massive traffic anomaly and likely advertiser budget reallocation triggered by the late-February Iran conflict. My expectation is a larger then normal revenue beat when it comes time to announce earnings. _ Reddit ( $RDDT ) is an asymmetric long that's actually extremely bullish during wartime, against common assumption that social media is net bearish. There's been no public earnings history to show this yet (since Reddit was not public during Ukraine conflict). But my alpha/thesis is for the first time ever: We'll see Reddit show up as one of the only bullish social media platforms during war. We'll find out of this is true or not during their earnings.
-
博主感谢粉丝并称赞其成长速度。
@Gubloinvestor 谢谢！你自身也在快速增长 :)。
英文原文
@Gubloinvestor Thank you! You’re growing really fast yourself :)
-
建议在高IV时短期卖出单一航司看跌期权。
@BrunoCptn 不，如果你要卖出看跌期权(Selling Puts)，应该针对像 $AAL 或 $DAL 这样的单一航空公司，且期限要短，隐含波动率(IV)要高。 但这也是个不错的交易思路。
英文原文
@BrunoCptn No, if you’re selling puts do it on individual airliners like $AAL or $DAL, short term, where IV is high. But that’s a great trade idea too
-
分享观点但强调因油价等未知因素不建议跟单。
@Vcondry84 谢谢！只是想分享一下。我绝不是建议人们进行这笔交易，因为中期油价等仍有大量未知数。
英文原文
@Vcondry84 Thanks! Just thought I’d share. By no means am I recommending people to take the trade since there’s still a lot of unknowns like mid term oil prices.
-
指出当前隐含波动率偏低，而远期单架飞机波动率显著上升。
@platochi 27%-28% 的隐含波动率(Implied Volatility, IV)仍然非常低。尽管图表走势和波动性相似，但2028年单架飞机的隐含波动率已从35%升至55%。 https://t.co/OhE9wTleTG
英文原文
@platochi 27%-28% IV is still really low. 2028 IV for individual airliners are all elevated from 35->55 despite the charts having similar movements + volatility. https://t.co/OhE9wTleTG
-
博主回复称乘坐达美航空经济舱。
@jainsaab88 我坐达美航空(Delta Airlines)的经济舱。
英文原文
@jainsaab88 I get economy class for delta airlines