· 供应链分析

分析光通信供应链中不同规模公司的上涨潜力,从大型成熟公司到细分领域纯业务公司

涉及标的:

中文翻译

三件事: 1/ 通常,市值越小,上涨空间越大(但风险也更高) 2/ 寻找那些未被定价进当前可插拔光模块周期的公司(EML光收发器公司如$LITE和$COHR) 3/ 纯业务布局即将到来的CPO/硅光子学范式转换。 说到追求“最高上涨空间”: 如果你看$MRVL的Celestial产品线对比$TSM的COUPE,两者都是大体量公司,而这只是它们营收的一小部分。所以这很可能被排除,除非交易员使用期权。 像$SOI的SOI衬底这类产品会对营收产生更实质性的影响(更高的上涨空间)。 然后还有像上游激光供应商$SIVE -> $POET -> $MRVL Celestial -> 超大规模云厂商供应链这样的环节,我已识别为高潜力受益者。 但像$AAOI这样的公司在800G/1.6T可插拔光模块周期中仍有巨大的上涨空间。 我相信市场上有许多被错误定价或未知的投资机会…… CPO规模化应用的TAM(总可寻址市场)像是垂直上升的,但像$SIVE这样的产品用于规模化应用的光源和激光阵列。

英文原文

Three things: 1/ Generally, the lower the marketcap, the higher the upside (but more risk) 2/ Finding companies that weren’t priced into current pluggable cycles (EMl-transceiver companies like $LITE and $COHR) 3/ Pure play to the upcoming cpo/silicon photonics paradigm shift. In terms of chasing “highest upside”: If you look at $MRVL Celestial to $TSM COUPE they’re both already massive companies. And it’s just a fraction of their revenue. So that’s likely excluded unless traders use options. Stuff like SOI substrates for $SOI will make a more material difference toward revenue (higher upside). Then others like upstream laser supplier $SIVE to ->$POET -> $MRVL Celestial -> hyperscaler supply chains, I’ve identified as a high potential beneficiary. But there’s still a massive upside for companies like $AAOI in the 800g/1.6T pluggable cycle. I’m sure there’s a lot of mispriced or unknown opportunites out there… as The TAM for cpo scale up is like a vertical like up, but things like $SIVE are used for light sources in scale up and laser arrays for scale up.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗