· 方法论

长文批评IREN无限ATM和营销式融资,认为NBIS才是更好Neocloud。

涉及标的:

中文翻译

$IREN 从70美元跌回46美元,跌幅34%。 我想知道 X 上最蠢的社区之一终于学会阅读了吗? $NBIS 客观上是更好的 Neocloud,并且有真正融资。 -> Nvidia 根本没有资助 $IREN。他们得到的是免费采购协议,让 IREN 使用他们的 logo 并通过稀释来买 GPU。 $NVDA 实际上给了 $NBIS 资本。 -> $IREN 面临像 $BKKT、$ASST、$SLNH 一样无休止稀释,散户财富通过60亿美元 ATM 转移过去,而所谓“5GW 产能”护城河在缩小。 $NBIS 实际使用的是让股权增值的融资结构。 这反映在两者年初至今的差异中。 我去年也说过同样的话。一个上涨约100%。 另一个持平,甚至根据入场点可能是负收益。 IREN 到现在字面上就是一家营销公司,因为它们能说服散户把资本通过财富转移交过去。

英文原文

$IREN back down -34% from $70 to $46. I wonder if one of the dumbest communities on X finally learned to read? $NBIS is objectively the better Neocloud, with actual financing. -> Nvidia didn’t fund $IREN at all. They got a free purchase agreement to let IREN use their logos and dilute for GPUS. $NVDA actually gave $NBIS capital. -> $IREN is facing endless dilution like $BKKT, $ASST, $SLNH as retail wealth transfers capital over from $6,000,000,000 ATMs, on a dwindling “5 GW capacity” moat. $NBIS actually uses equity appreciating financing structures. And this is reflected in the YTD differences between them both. I’ve said the same thing last year too. One is up ~100%. The other is flat, and even negative depending on entry points. IREN is literally a marketing company at this point by how they manage to convince retail to wealth transfer over capital.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗