· 供应链分析
@Meatusmax @adiradir734145 好问题，主要是关于 $SIVE 的第三方评论+行动。Ayar 可能对我而言信息量最大，他们从官网供应链板块移除了 $LITE / $MTSI，仅单独展示 Sivers 作为激光器供应商。Ayar 副总裁也称 Sivers 是“赋能我们光学 I/O 解决方案的关键”，这是相当强烈的看多信号。还有 $JBL 在选定 Sivers 后构建了 1.6T LRO（长距光学），这非常罕见，并在一次壁炉对话中炫耀其技术护城河。$GFS 也选择 Sivers 作为参考激光器并在演示文稿中展示。感觉所有领先玩家都在因某种原因推进 Sivers？我假设这些领先公司做了尽职调查(DD)。
@Meatusmax @adiradir734145 Good question, it's mainly third party commentary + actions around $SIVE. Ayar probably speaks volumes to me most removing $LITE / $MTSI from their supply chain section of their site. Then just featuring Sivers by itself for the laser suppliers. VP at Ayar also said Sivers was ... "essential to powering our optical I/O solution", which is pretty high signal commentary. Then you have $JBL that built a 1.6T LRO after selecting Sivers, which is very rare. And bragged about their technological moat at one of the fireside chats. Then $GFS choosing Sivers as the reference laser too and featuring them in their presentations... Feels like all your leading players are moving forward with Sivers for some reason? And I'd assume these leading companies did their DD