· 方法论

欧洲和美国的定价方式不同

涉及标的:

中文翻译

你好,感谢更有建设性的讨论。 但除了欧洲人之外,我还真没见过谁会因为 2.5%、1300 万美元的稀释,就去抱怨一家要登陆纳斯达克的公司。 在美国……我们有些随机的比特币矿工,光为了试图转型和买 GPU,就能搞出 60 亿美元以上的稀释(超过公司一半市值)。所以对超大规模云厂商供应链来说,这点稀释其实非常小。 你也应该明白,你讨论的是美国超大规模云厂商的供应商,对吧?比如 $JBL、$MRVL……最近所有 CPO 时间表都被 $NVDA 提前了。 如果有什么的话,Sivers 是我见过最被低估的光子股票之一,而且绝对还没把上行计价进去。 美国市场通常会提前 12 个月定价,但我能理解欧洲是按过去 12 个月来看的。

英文原文

Hi, appreciate the more productive discussion. But I've never seen anyone aside from Europeans complain about 2.5% $13M dilution to get listed on NASDAQ. Over in the US... we have random Bitcoin miners with $6B+ dilution (over half the MC) just to attempt a pivot and buy GPUs. So the amount to hyperscalers supply chains is very tiny. And you do realize you're talking about US hyperscalers suppliers right? Like $JBL, $MRVL... All the CPO timelines have been accelerated by $NVDA recently. If anything Sivers is one of the most undervalued photonic stocks I've seen in the market and definitely not priced for upside yet. US markets typically price things 12 months in advance, but I understand if Europe does things previous 12 months.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗