· 供应链分析

认为机构还没充分认识 SIVE 的上游激光瓶颈价值,可能在悄悄吸筹。

涉及标的:

中文翻译

$SIVE 这个大约 4 亿美元市值的名字,我是真心相信的…… 机构错过了它作为超大规模云厂商上游激光瓶颈的价值。 看 $TSEM 按我的 thesis 走出来后,股价涨了 70%,市值到了 210 亿美元以上。 散户流不会把 NASDAQ 股票推高 100 多亿美元。 真正做到这一点的是信息发现和信息整合,尤其是在机构也验证并跟进之后。 $SIVE 以前大部分由瑞典散户持有,几乎没有机构投资者。 现在,关于 $MRVL、Ayar、Jabil、O-Net 的上游 CW 激光供应商的信息已经传播开来。 而且最近 $AVGO 和其他一些评论也明确说激光器是供应链里的明确瓶颈: 我强烈认为,机构正在用冰山单、VWAP 算法,或者其他任何方式,从瑞典散户手里吸筹,以便吃到即将到来的 CW 激光瓶颈。 再说一次,最接近 $SIVE 的对标是: $MTSI 和 $LITE,它们市值分别是 180 亿和 550 亿美元。 Sivers 的市值大约只有 4 亿美元。 在光子供应链发生架构范式转变的时候: 我觉得散户难得有机会去抢在机构前面布局 $SIVE,并重仓配置即将到来的 CW / EML 激光瓶颈。

英文原文

$SIVE at ~$400m MC is a name I genuinely believe... Institutions missed as the upstream laser chokepoint for hyperscalers. When you look at $TSEM following my thesis, the stock went up 70% to a $21B+ MC. Retail flows do not send NASDAQ stocks up $10B+. Information discovery and synthesis does. Especially when institutions validate it, and follow along. $SIVE was majority owned by Sweden retail investors, with **almost 0 institutional investors**. Now that information is distributed regarding the Upstream CW laser supplier for $MRVL, Ayar, Jabil, O-Net. And with $AVGO + other comments recently stating lasers were a clear bottleneck for supply chains: I strongly think that institutions are trying to accumulate off Swedish retail hands through Iceberg orders, vwap algos, or any other methods to gain exposure to the upcoming CW laser bottleneck. Again, the closest comparison to $SIVE are: $MTSI and $LITE, both at $18B and $55B MCs. Sivers trades at ~$400m MC. With architectural paradigm shifts in photonic supply chains: I think retail has a rare opportunity to frontrun institutions with $SIVE and have heavy exposure to the upcoming CW/EML laser bottleneck.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗