· 个股论点
我个人并不觉得它长期有太多下行风险，除了稀释之外。因为 $SIVE 是很多客户（比如 $POET、$JBL、Ayar、O-Net 等）的关键材料来源，而不是只押单一客户。 而且和 $IQE 相比，他们通过 Win Semi 这条链条更偏无晶圆厂模式，所以资本开支更轻。 反过来，$IQE 有很多债务，但也有大量资产，想要被市场强力重估，需要先重组。 这两边的风险画像完全不同，$SIVE 明显更有非对称性。 $IQE 也许有可能因为台湾出售成功而在一天内涨 2.5 倍，长期也可能像 Landmark 那样，如果他们变得更纯粹地做 InP 外延片，股价会更好看。当然，债务悬在头顶也是事实。 但我不会把所有鸡蛋放在一个篮子里，我更喜欢押多匹有机会赢的马。
I personally don’t see much downside risk in the long run aside from dilution since $SIVE is the light for many customers like $POET, $JBL, Ayar, O-Net, and others rather than one. And compared to $IQE they’re fabless through win semi so capex is more lightweight. $IQE on the other hand has a lot of debt, but a huge amount of assets, and requires restructuring to be strongly rerated. Risk profiles are extremely different, $SIVE definitely more assymetrical. $IQE can possibly 2.5x in a day based on a successful Taiwan sale, and over the long run like Landmark if they become more pure play inp epiwafer. But of course lot of debt overhang But I don’t put all my eggs in one basket and like to pick multiple horses that can win the race