· 个股论点

因巨额稀释及风险收益失衡,作者看空 $IREN 并推荐 $CIFR 和 $NBIS。

涉及标的:

中文翻译

我看不到任何持有 $IREN 的 compelling case(有力理由)。 尤其是考虑到在 $128亿市值下新增 $60亿的股票稀释。 人们可能会看到市值膨胀至 $200-$250亿。 但他们的股份价值会随时间递减。 风险收益比已经不再存在。 像 $CIFR 这样的公司,通过 Fluidstack 为 $AMZN 和 $GOOGL 提供 Colo(数据中心托管)模式,提供了更具非对称性的上行空间。 而像 $NBIS 这样的公司则提供更好的多元化(Robotaxis(自动驾驶出租车)、ClickHouse),执行风险更低,且资本支出得到良好支持。 对于 $IREN,无法合理化接近市值一半的稀释并为此欢呼。 即使有新的 Hyperscaler(超大规模云服务商)交易,风险收益比也不存在。 我去年对 $IREN 看多,但已卖出。持有者经历了从: -> 3GW 容量,轻资产,Colo 模式(我曾看好) -> 为 $MSFT 购买 GPU 并为其转型的执行风险欢呼(我不看好) 到 -> 为 $60亿新股稀释欢呼,并在公开市场上被反向抛售。(AMC 接盘者领地) 如果你努力证明新的 ~50% 稀释是好事,且在你持仓被抛售时信任管理层: 抱歉告诉你,你现在加入了数据中心领域的 $AMC 等价俱乐部。 市场上有更好的多头标的。

英文原文

I see zero compelling case to hold $IREN. Especially given the new $6B share dilution at a $12.8B marketcap. People will likely see that marketcap inflate to $20-$25B. But the value of their shares decrease over time. The risk reward is just not there anymore. Companies like $CIFR offer much more asymmetrical upside given their colo model for $AMZN and $GOOGL through Fluidstack. And companies like $NBIS offer much better diversification (robotaxis, clickhouse), derisked execution, and are well supported for capex. With $IREN, there’s no way to justify being diluted close to half the market cap and cheering that on. Even with a new hyperscaler deal there’s risk reward is just not there. I was bullish $IREN last year but sold it. As holders went from: -> 3GW capacity, asset lite, Colo model (was a fan of this) -> Buying GPUs for $MSFT and cheering on execution risks from the pivot (not a fan) Into -> Cheering on $6B of new share dilution + getting sold on the open market against their positions. (AMC bagholder territory) If you’re trying hard to justify why new ~50% dilution is a good thing sold against your positions and trusting in management: Sorry to tell you, that you’re now in the $AMC equivalent club for datacenters. There are much better longs out there.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗