· 供应链分析

对比NBIS与CRWV债务风险,指出市场忽视个体差异盲目联动。

涉及标的:

中文翻译

是的,这是个很好的例子。如果你查看 $NBIS 和 $IREN 的可转债发行,由于 $MSFT(Magnificent 7)是它们共同的积压订单,两者的利率都在1-2.5%左右。许多新云厂商受到 OpenAI 的影响,甚至像 $APLD 这样通过 $CRWV(主要租户)间接关联两跳的公司,也不得不以9.25%的利率出售垃圾债券。$NBIS 每年支付约7300万美元利息,而 $CRWV 支付超过13亿美元。但市场似乎因 OpenAI 的传染效应而整体联动该板块,未能区分那些被隔离的个别公司。利息债务、风险和客户锚点的差异是巨大的。

英文原文

Yep that’s a good example. If you look at convertible offerings for $NBIS and $IREN both their interest rates were 1-2.5% roughly because $MSFT (mag7) is their shared backlog. A lot of Neoclouds are affected by OpenAi though and even by two hops like $APLD from $CRWV(main tenant), which had to sell junk bonds at 9.25%. $NBIS is paying ~$73m/year from interest, while $CRWV is paying upwards of $1.3B. But the market seems to move the whole sector together from OpenAI contagion without discerning individual companies that are isolated. The difference in interest debt, risk, and customer anchors is massive.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗