· 供应链分析

四大流动性冲击引发高杠杆资产暴跌,但AI巨头基本面未变。

涉及标的:

中文翻译

市场刚刚经历了近代史上最严重的去杠杆冲击。 高贝塔资产正在崩溃: • $NBIS, $IREN, AI 股票从高点下跌约 40%+ • $MSTR, $BTC 在过去一个月暴跌 30-40%+ • 加密货币市值蒸发超过 1.2 万亿美元 这不正常,这是针对市场上增长最快且杠杆最高的板块的强制平仓。 以下是同时发生的四个流动性流失因素: 1. 加密货币前兆冲击(2025 年 10 月 – Binance 故障) • Binance 的定价错误导致 USDe 跌至 0.65 美元,在 24 小时内触发了超过 190 亿美元的强制清算 • 使用 USDe/wBETH/BNSOL 的高杠杆头寸(25x–50x)引发了全行业连锁保证金清算的连锁反应 • 该事件使加密货币结构脆弱,波动性现在威胁到流入 $MSTR/国债股票超过 70 亿美元的 MSCI 资金,存在 BTC/NAV 错配和强制出售比特币的风险 2. 美联储政策不确定性(降息鞭打效应) • 在美联储发出矛盾信号后两天内,市场对 12 月降息预期从 97% → 35% → 70%+ • 这种波动起到了隐性紧缩的作用,迫使杠杆基金和算法(在 $NVDA 财报后看到的情况)提前去杠杆 • 政策模糊性提高了全球风险,将美国的不确定性传导至全球融资市场的广泛抛售 3. AI 信贷压力(投机性债务破裂) • AI 建设需要 3.5 万亿美元的外部融资,促使公司大量进入债务市场 • Google + XAI 在 Similarweb 上的使用量提升引发了人们对 OpenAI 和循环融资的担忧,以及 $1T+ 的资本支出流向 $ORCL, $CRWV, $AMD 等公司,而这些公司并没有必要的资本。 • Applied Digital [ $APLD ] 23.5 亿美元垃圾债券(评级 B+)暴露了交易对手和集中度风险,由于需要更多债务来资助建设,其股票及相关数据中心股票下跌。 • 资本市场开始区分拥有真实现金流的公司和依赖投机性债务及 OpenAI 合同的公司,惩罚了如 $ORCL 和 $CRWV 等标的。 4. 日元套利交易平仓(催化剂) • 日本央行加息至 0.5% 及正常化缩小了美日利差,挤压了 80 万亿日元(约 5000 亿美元)的杠杆头寸 • 日本国债收益率上升引发回流资金,给美国收益率带来压力并抽干全球流动性 • 强制平仓导致投资者出售美国科技股和加密货币以偿还日元贷款,加剧了避险情绪的连锁反应 底线: 所有四个冲击都从市场的同一角落抽干了流动性——高贝塔、高杠杆资产,导致成长型科技和加密货币剧烈去杠杆,并增加了进一步强制抛售的风险。 过度的杠杆、脆弱的资产负债表和集中度风险决定了哪些资产跌幅最大。 美联储开启新一轮降息周期是一个“拐点”,投资者需要判断这种宽松是预防性措施还是对更严重衰退的反应。然而有一件事是确定的: 宏观冲击重置了估值,但并没有改变从 $NBIS 到 $META 的企业基本面。

英文原文

Markets just suffered their worst deleveraging shock in recent history. High-beta assets are collapsing: • $NBIS, $IREN, AI stocks are down ~40%+ from peaks • $MSTR, $BTC plunged 30-40%+ in the past month • Crypto erased over $1.2 trillion in value This wasn’t normal, it was a forced unwind across the markets with the most growth and leverage. Here's the four liquidity drains hitting at once: 1. Crypto precursor shock (Oct 2025 – Binance failure) • A pricing error on Binance sent USDe to $0.65, triggering $19B+ in forced liquidations in 24 hours • Highly leveraged positions (25x–50x) using USDe/wBETH/BNSOL cascaded into a chain reaction of cascading margin liquidations across the industry • The event left crypto structurally fragile, and volatility now threatens $7B+ MSCI inflows into $MSTR/treasury stocks, risking BTC/NAV mispricing and forced Bitcoin sales 2. Fed policy uncertainty (rate cut whiplash) • Markets priced a December cut at 97% → 35% → 70%+ in two days after conflicting Fed signals • This volatility acted as a stealth tightening, forcing leveraged funds and algorithms (seen post $NVDA earnings) to deleverage pre-emptively • Policy ambiguity raised global risk, transmitting U.S. uncertainty into broad selling across global funding markets 3. AI credit stress (speculative debt cracks) • AI build-out requires $3.5T in external financing, pushing companies heavily into debt markets • Google + XAI raise in usage per similarweb raised concerns about OpenAI and circular financing, alongside how $1T+ in capex spend going into $ORCL, $CRWV, $AMD, and others without having the ncessary capital. • Applied Digital [ $APLD ] $2.35B junk bond (rated B+) exposed counterparty and concentration risk, sending its stock and related data center stocks down due to the need of more debt to fund buildout. • Capital markets began differentiating between firms with real cash flow and those reliant on speculative debt and OpenAI contracts, punishing names such as $ORCL and $CRWV. 4. Yen carry trade unwind (the catalyst) • BoJ rate hikes to 0.5% and normalization narrowed the U.S.–Japan rate gap, squeezing ¥80T (~$500B) in leveraged positions • Rising JGB yields triggered repatriation flows, pressuring U.S. yields and draining global liquidity • Forced unwinds led investors to sell U.S. tech and crypto to repay yen loans, amplifying the risk-off cascade Bottom line: All four shocks drained liquidity from the same corner of the market, high-beta, leveraged assets, driving a violent unwind in growth tech and crypto and raising the risk of further forced selling. Excessive leverage, fragile balance sheets, and concentration risk determined which assets crashed the hardest. The beginning of a new rate-cutting cycle by the Fed is an "inflection point" as investors need to determine whether the easing is a preventative measure or a reaction to a more serious downturn. However one thing is for certain: The macro shock reset valuations, but it didn’t change the fundamentals of businesses from $NBIS to $META.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗