· 个股论点

比较AAOI与SIVE:前者制造规模,后者独特IP和CPO供应商渗透。

涉及标的:

中文翻译

$AAOI 更偏纯制造规模,我极度看多它们。 所以在我看来,它更像 Furukawa + Innolight?因此对收入爬坡极其看多。 $SIVE 则是纯粹独一无二的 IP,主要 CPO 超大云供应商似乎都使用它们,比如 Ayar/Celestial 等。 甚至 $JBL 也用 Sivers 做出突破性的 1.6T LRO 护城河。 Sivers 的上限很高,未来也总能像 $COHR / $AAOI 那样用资本开支做垂直整合。 但它们当前主要重点应该是创造尽可能大的 IP 护城河,并把制造外包以保持轻资本。 以后也总能垂直整合组装和激光晶圆厂。 我喜欢它们两个,但原因不同。

英文原文

$AAOI is more pure manufacturing scale and I'm extremely bullish on them. So it's more like Furukawa + Innolight in my view? So extremely bullish for revenue ramp. $SIVE is just pure one-of-a-kind IP, where major CPO hyperscaler supplier seems to all use them, like Ayar/Celestial and others. Even $JBL made groundbreaking 1.6T LRO moats with Sivers. Sky is the limit here with Sivers and they can always vertically integrate like $COHR / $AAOI down the road too with capex spend. But their main focus right now should just creating the largest IP moat possible + outsource manufacturing to keep capex light. Can always vertically integrate the assembly, laser fab down the road too. I like them both for different reasons.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗