· 个股论点
这次终于感谢 MarketScreener 对 $SOI 的真实报道。 文章写道： “在专门讨论 Soitec 的帖子里，作者提出了几个论点。他认为，该集团可能受益于 CPO（共封装光学）的发展，而 CPO 是为伴随人工智能和数据中心崛起而设计的一种光子架构。根据他的说法，Soitec 在该技术所用的某些 SOI 衬底上拥有近乎垄断的地位，如果光子技术被大规模采用，这一优势可能变得具有战略意义。该投资者还提到，他认为估值水平偏低，并相信到 2027 年，市场可能会开始提前布局一个对光子技术有前景的周期。” 这其实就是我原来的 thesis，没有多余修饰。 上一次 FT 和 Bloomberg 报道我的 $RPI 论点时，他们莫名其妙给贴上“meme stock”的标签，还硬加了不少我根本没说过的话，直接带来负面情绪。 不过话说回来： $SOI 基本上是 CPO 衬底层上的虚拟垄断。 未来一两年我会继续持有，因为我预计它会成为 $NVDA 主导的下一轮架构起量中的最大受益者。
Thank you MarketScreener for actual coverage of $SOI this time. The article writes: “In the post dedicated to Soitec, the author puts forward several arguments. He believes that the group could benefit from the development of CPO (co-packaged optics), a photonic architecture designed to accompany the rise of artificial intelligence and data centers. According to him, Soitec would have a quasi-monopolistic position on certain SOI substrates used in this technology, an advantage that could become strategic if photonics is adopted on a large scale. The investor also mentions a valuation level that he considers low and believes that the market could begin to position itself ahead of a promising cycle for photonics by 2027” This was exactly the thesis, no extra fluff. Last time media from FT and Bloomberg covered my thesis on $RPI, they labeled it a “meme-stock” out of nowhere. With many outlets straight up adding words never stated, which triggered negative sentiment. That being said: $SOI is a virtual monopoly over the substrate layer for CPO. I plan to hold my positions over the next year or two, as I expect it to be the largest beneficiary of the upcoming architectural ramp spearheaded by $NVDA.