· 供应链分析

反驳收入无法覆盖折旧论,指出利用率提升带来经营杠杆效应。

涉及标的:

中文翻译

“收入无法在折旧之上实现规模化增长”是错误的,你没有正确陈述单位定价(会下降)与经营杠杆(会规模化)的关系。在“前置投入”阶段,你拥有资产(折旧正在发生),但尚未产生全部收入。随着你为 $MSFT/$META 合同及其他客户启动集群,利用率提高,利润率随之扩张(可变)。因此,“收入无法在折旧之上实现规模化增长”是谬误,因为收入确实能通过利用率在折旧之上实现规模化增长(折旧是固定的,而收入是可变的)。只需看看 $CRWV 约 74% 的现金利润率,它足以覆盖折旧。(忽略 $CRWV 庞大的利息债务,而 $IREN 和 $NBIS 都没有这种债务)。

英文原文

"Revenue doesn't scale past depreciation" is wrong, you're not stating unit pricing (which degrades) vs. operating leverage (which scales) correctly. In the "front loading" phase, you have the assets (depreciation is active) but not the full rev yet. As you turn on clsuters for the $MSFT/ $META contract and others, utilization increases and margins expand (variable). So "revenue doesn't scale past depreciation" is false because revenue absolutely scales past depreciation due to utilization. (depreciation is fixed while revenue is variable) Just look at ~74% or so cash margins from $CRWV that cover the depreciation. (ignoring $CRWV's massive interest debt which both $IREN and $NBIS dont have).

在 X 上查看原推 ↗