$PDYN

提及 3 首次 2026-01-16 最近 2026-01-24

相关推文

按时间倒序

  1. 提及无人机及战争板块个股机会,强调研究充分后再评论。

    没问题!像 $RCAT、$PDYN 这样的无人机板块股票也有很多,从主题上看应该也是看涨的。只是需要关注的股票太多了,如果我对某只股票的研究还不够深入,我尽量不去评论。$OSS 未来应该会很有趣,因为有战争板块的顺风因素。

    英文原文

    No problem! There's a lot of drone sector stocks like $RCAT, $PDYN too that should be thematically bullish. There's just too many stocks to look at and I try not to comment if I didn't do enough research into them yet. $OSS should be interesting going forward with War sector tailwinds

  2. 澄清估值指标,分享对PDYN及DPRO作为分包商被算法低估的看法。

    承接上文,我想说的是企业价值/收入(EV/Revenue)比率,而非上面的市销率(P/S)。不过我之前也研究过 $PDYN,这是一家有趣的公司。另外,关于 $DPRO 的帖子并没有太多新内容,因为它在 Finx 上已经很流行了。关键在于其基础设施布局+大规模产能爬坡+作为分包商(subcontractor)缺乏亮眼合同这一复杂情况,这往往能触发季度财报(Q reports)中算法可能未定价的因素。很多人忽略了这一点,所以我想分享自己的看法。

    英文原文

    Pigybacking off of this, meant to say ev/revenue not p/s above. But yeah I looked at $PDYN before too, interesting company. Also there's nothing too new with the $DPRO post since it's already popular on finx. It's just really nuanced with the infrastructure setup + large capacity ramp + no flashy contracts since it's a subcontractor -> hits Q reports that algos might not price in. A lot of people missed that aspect, so just wanted to post my own thoughts about it.

  3. 巨头垂直整合软件,投资无法整合的瓶颈环节更优。

    虽然我喜欢 $PDYN,因为它能填补像 $RCAT 和 $DPRO 这样的小公司留下的空白,但在这里它们没有用武之地。 我关注的是波士顿动力、特斯拉、Figure 等机器人的规模化扩张。它们都像 $TSLA 的 Dojo AI5 + XAI 那样垂直整合自己的软件。 $META 等巨头没有任何动力将它们的软件栈交给 $PDYN。 它们都尽可能地进行垂直整合,因此,如果你能 pinpoint(锁定)那些在无法垂直整合的环节拥有有效垄断(即“瓶颈”)的公司,那么随着这些公司规模的扩大,投资这些瓶颈环节应该会获得回报。

    英文原文

    So while I like $PDYN since they fill in the gaps with smaller companies like $RCAT and $DPRO. They have no role here. I'm focused on robotics scale-up with Boston Dynamics, Tesla, Figure, and others. They all vertically integrate their own software, like $TSLA Dojo AI5 + XAI. There's 0 incentive for any of these giant companies from $META and others to give their software stack over to $PDYN. They all try and vertically integrate where they can, so if you pinpoint the companies that have effective monopolies "aka. bottlenecks" where they can't, then investing in those should be rewarding as these companies scale up.