· 个股论点

驳斥克拉默观点,基于基本面看好内存与存储股,中期看多 Leopold 持仓。

涉及标的:

相关概念: AI 资本支出

中文翻译

今天看到吉姆·克拉默(Jim Cramer)支持对冲基金做空 Leopold 关于 $SNDK / $DRAM / SK Hynix 的“胡言乱语”式看涨观点。同时克拉默称 $CRWD 为“必买”。我不确定克拉默是否看到一家被贴上“网络安全”标签的 2410 亿美元市值公司就认为其安全,而忽略了所有基本面。但就 CrowdStrike 而言,这是一家 2028 财年远期市盈率(Forward P/E)约 145 倍、营收同比增长 26% 的公司,克拉默却认为它是“必买”。然后看看 Leopold 做多的 AI 资本支出受益主题。像 $SKHY / 三星在 $DRAM 领域……分析师预测 2027 财年远期市盈率仅约 2.8-3 倍。-> 三星签订至 2031 年的长期协议(LTA)(70% 产能)以确保耐用性…… -> SK Hynix 提供最低价格底线 + 无价格上限类型的合同。-> 未来一年内存短缺将更加严峻。-> DRAM/NAND 占超大规模云厂商资本支出的比例更高(Trendforce 估计为 68%)。-> 2027 年超大规模云厂商资本支出预测全部上调。至于 $SNDK,2030 年自由现金流(FCF)利润率预计达 50%,毛利率达 80%。我唯一不同意 Situational Awareness 持仓的是 $CRWV,因为债务利息侵蚀自由现金流,但我可以对 $BE、$INTC、$AMD 等提出类似的看涨论点。短期尚不确定,但中期来看:鉴于压倒性的基本面,很难不认为 Leopold 的持仓会走出与克拉默截然相反(Inverse Cramer)的走势。

英文原文

I've seen comments from Jim Cramer today supporting hedge funds that short Leopold's "nonsense" $SNDK / $DRAM / SK Hynix type calls. As well Cramer calling $CRWD a "Must Buy". I'm not sure if Jim Cramer sees a $241B company labelled "Cybersecurity" and thinks of it as safe... while ignoring all their fundamentals. But with Crowdstrike, you have a ~145x FY2028 fwd P/E company, growing revenue 26% Y/Y. That Cramer thinks is a "must buy". And then you turn your eyes to the AI capex beneficiary theme that Leopold is long on. With names like $SKHY / Samsung in $DRAM... Both FY2027 ~2.8-3x fwd P/E off analyst projections. -> Samsung LTAs to 2031 (70% capacity) for durability... -> Minimum price floor + no price ceiling type contracts from SK Hynix. -> Memory shortage much tigher for the next year. -> DRAM/NAND % of hyperscaler capex goes higher (est. 68% per Trendforce) -> 2027 hyperscaler capex projections all hiked. Then with $SNDK, 50% FCF margins, 80% gross margin projections into 2030. Only Situational Awareness position I'm in disagreement with is $CRWV due to debt interest eating FCF, but I can make a similar bullish argument with $BE, $INTC, $AMD, and others. Not quite sure about short-term, but over the medium run: It's hard to not see Leopold's positions pulling an Inverse Cramer due to overwhelming fundamentals.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗