· 供应链分析

存储瓶颈未变,供需失衡加剧,基本面与短期价格常背离。

涉及标的:

相关概念: AI 资本支出

中文翻译

既然 $MU 到 $SNDK 都实现了大幅反弹。很高兴能提醒一下,存储瓶颈(Memory Bottleneck)并没有改变!连续波激光器(CW Lasers)、衬底(Substrates)或其他领域也是如此。但短期情绪(取决于价格/宏观)往往会变化。我认为许多供需失衡(Demand Imbalances)会比人们预期的更严重:- 今天日经新闻提到一些日本分销商称存储需求缺口已达 40-60%(比供应高出 67-150%)。随着普遍价格到年底上涨 50%。- $SPCX 未包含在 $1.3T 超大规模云厂商资本支出(Capex)数据中(我认为 Wells Fargo 等估计 AI 资本支出约 2630 亿美元),因此总资本支出数据可能会令人惊讶。- $SNDK 预计 80% 的毛利率将持续到 2030 年……(欢迎来到标普 100 指数)- 再次强调,现在对 2031 年有了长期的可见性。像 Samsung Memory 这样的公司波动性非常大……我的一些持仓上涨了 270%+,所以我发现更容易在波动时期持有。但无论如何,运营基本面并不总是与短期价格走势一致。同样的概念也可以应用于其他板块。

英文原文

Now that $MU to $SNDK have pulled a major recovery. Good to have a reminder that the memory bottleneck hasn’t changed! Same with CW lasers… substrates… or others. But short term sentiment (depending on prices/macro) often does. I think a lot of demand imbalances get worse than people expect: - There’s some Japanese distributors in Nikkei today saying memory demand deficit has reached 40-60% (67-150% higher than supply). With general prices going up 50% by years end. - $SPCX isn’t included in the $1.3T hyperscaler capex figures (I think Wells Fargo ets. ~$263b AI capex), so total capex figures might be surprising. - $SNDK expects 80% gross margins to continue into 2030… (welcome to S&P 100) - and once again you have long term visibility into 2031 now with companies like Samsung Memory is very really volatile… some of my positions are up 270%+, so I find it a bit easier to hold through volatile periods. But regardless, operating fundamentals doesn’t always align with short term price movements. Same concept can be applied to other sectors.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗