· 方法论

建议用资格认证爬坡和晶圆产能而非管道收入来预测JBL营收。

涉及标的:

相关概念: Pluggable 可插拔光模块

中文翻译

@dBooray @SoundResponse 我使用“管道收入”(pipeline revenue) 来评估其客户质量相对于此前管道收入预估的情况。例如,$JBL / $GFS 第一季度超过 7 亿美元,而第二季度增加了 6 家可插拔(pluggable)合作伙伴。这并非进行收入预测的理想指标,因为我认为一旦他们扩展产品线(例如向下游延伸至光引擎或完整可插拔模块),其可寻址市场(AM)和爬坡(ramp)表现会好得多。在此期间,我认为追踪 $JBL 的资格认证(qualification)爬坡以及建模为收入的晶圆产能,并假设在短缺情况下能售出,是更好的方法。

英文原文

@dBooray @SoundResponse I use pipeline revenue as a measure est. quality of their customers relative to previous pipeline revenue estimates. Eg. Q1 $JBL / $GFS $700M+, vs. Q2. 6 pluggable partners added. Not really a good figure to go off for revenue projections, since I’d expect addressable market + ramp to be much better once they expand product lines (eg. More downstream into optical engines or complete pluggables). In the meantime I think it’s better to track $JBL / qualification ramps and wafer capacity modeled into revenue, and assume it gets sold given shortages.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗