中文翻译
@homeboyrichie 目前确实如此，因为 Lumilens 拥有直接的超大规模客户和数十亿美元的采购协议。而 $SIVE 是一家上游激光器供应商。Sivers 需要向下游拓展，通过销售光引擎、ELS 或像 $LITE 在并购 Cloud Light 后那样销售完整的光模块，以捕获更大的总可服务市场(TAM)。我的观点是，鉴于合格的激光器供应商数量有限，向下游拓展比向上游更容易。
· 供应链分析
Sivers需向下游拓展以扩大市场，因向下游比向上游更容易。
相关概念： Pluggable 可插拔光模块
英文原文
@homeboyrichie For now yes, because Lumilens has a direct hyperscaler customer and multi-billion dollar purchase agreements. While $SIVE is an upstream laser supplier. Sivers needs to work its way downstream to capture more TAM with selling optical engines, ELS, or complete optical transceivers like $LITE did after M&A eg. Cloud Light. My opinion is that it’s easier to move downstream than upstream as you seen with the limited amount of qualified laser suppliers out there.