· 个股论点

批评机构误报,认为忽略噪音后MRVL是稳健长线标的。

涉及标的:

中文翻译

$POET 通过 Celestial 间接受益于 $MRVL。此外还有大量与 Maia 绑定的其他光子学玩家,如 $AAOI。 但时间线简直荒谬,让我很恼火: 12月8日:Benchmark 下调评级,声称“高度确信”Marvell 输掉了 Trainium 3/4 给 Alchip。 12月9日:股价下跌约10%,CEO 上 CNBC 称“我们没丢失任何业务”。 12月23日:Benchmark 悄悄收回说法。Marvell “保留份额”,Alchip 仅增加“额外设计支持”。 Benchmark 做出此类声明后又在压低股价后悄悄收回,简直不可思议。 The Information 也如法炮制,但他们本就因煽动性报道闻名。 如果你只看数据并忽略新闻报道的噪音,$MRVL 看起来是一个极其稳健的长线标的。

英文原文

$POET indirectly benefits from $MRVL through Celestial. Then there's tons of other photonic players tethered to Maia like $AAOI. The timeline is so stupid though, it makes me annoyed: Dec 8: Benchmark downgrades, claims "high conviction" Marvell lost Trainium 3/4 to Alchip Dec 9: Stock drops ~10%, CEO goes on CNBC saying "we didn't lose any business" Dec 23: Benchmark quietly walks it back. Marvell "retains a position," Alchip added for "additional design support" Just found it insane how Benchmark could make claims like that then silently walk it back after tanking the stock price. Then The Information does the same but they're already known for their sensational journalism. If you just look at the numbers and ignore the noise from news reporting then $MRVL looks like an extremely solid long.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗