· 方法论
涉及标的： $FUTU$TIGR$GOOGL$BABA$PDD$META
感觉 $FUTU 和 $TIGR 有点麻烦？中国政府正在追溯它们的历史收入。 中国基本没有公平法律（尤其是知识产权方面），所以如果政府想做某件事，法院会对它们不利。 因此几乎没有上诉机会，除非它们私下达成隐藏交易。我也不认为这些券商能像 $GOOGL 面对20 decillion 罚款那样处理，因为它们有本地运营。 所以简而言之：这是一个好教训，要尽量避免从 $BABA 到 $PDD 的中国敞口…… 而且正如 $META + Manus + 这次案例所示，即使某些东西看起来便宜，也有原因。 这也是为什么所有美国股票都有溢价，即便有点高。
Feels like $FUTU and $TIGR are kinda screwed? The Chinese Gov is going after their historical revenues. There's basically no fair law in China (esp. with IP), so if Gov wants something done, courts will be rigged against them. So no chance of an appeal, unless they make a hidden deal. Also don't think the brokerages are able to pull a $GOOGL like their 20 decillion fine, given local operations So TLDR: Good lesson learned to avoid Chinese exposure from $BABA to $PDD as much as possible... And (as seen with $META + Manus + this case), even if something looks cheap. There's a reason why all the US equities have premiums, even if a little high.