· 方法论

主张与其烧昂贵导弹,不如更多投入定向能武器。

涉及标的:

中文翻译

或者……与其把几十亿美元花在“更便宜的导弹”上。 毕竟现在用 300 到 400 万美元的爱国者导弹去打便宜无人机,根本不奏效。 我们是不是该更多研究并部署像 $LASR 和 HPM 这样的定向能武器? 用 HEL(高能激光)的话: 它就是一束光……砰砰。每发 3.5 美元。 用 HPM(高功率微波)的话——它是一道能量锥,用来打无人机蜂群。 也许每次脉冲 0.05 美元左右?弹药基本等于无限。 虽然 $LMT 和 $RTX 也在做这些,但感觉我们只是一直在买昂贵导弹去给它们送钱。 如果把原本花在导弹上的数十亿美元,转去资助这类无限弹药的新技术…… 也许早就能把定向能武器做得更成熟了(比如解决驻留时间、天气变化、射程、功率这些问题)。 在伊朗这种延长冲突里,用几十亿美元的导弹去打便宜无人机,显然不可持续。

英文原文

Or... instead of spending billions on "cheaper missiles". Since blowing $3-4M Patriots to down cheap drones isn't working. We start to do more research and deploy Energy Directed Weapons like $LASR and HPM? With HEL (High Energy Lasers): It's a beam of light... pew pew. $3.50 per shot. With HPM (High Powered Microwaves) - It's a cone of energy for drone swarms. Maybe ~$0.05 per burst? Ammo is basically free and infinite. Even though $LMT and $RTX are developing these too... it's like we just keep buying expensive missiles to line their pockets at this point. More funding around this infinite ammo new tech, instead used for all those missiles... Probably could have made energy weapons better by now (eg. fixing problems with dwell time, weather changes, range, power). Firing billions of dollars of missiles at cheap drones clearly is not sustainable for extended conflicts in Iran.

在 X 上查看原推 ↗