中文翻译
是的。我非常不同意那些分析师帖子里说“已经计价了”，还叫散户在 2.5 亿美元市值时获利了结的说法。 -> 在 $SIVE 被 $JBL 证实会用于他们即将推出的收发器之后。 -> 在 $SIVE 已经进入 O-Net 供应链之后。 然后在如今最大的一级光学供应商之一已经确认是 Sivers 买家的情况下，还说这是“情绪驱动”？ 再强调一次，目前这只股票大部分仍由散户持有，所以我个人认为机构是在试图从散户手里吸筹。
· 供应链分析
反对“已经计价”的说法，强调 SIVE 已获 Jabil 与 O-Net 供应链确认，仍可能被机构低位吸筹。
英文原文
Yeah. I extremely disagree with analysts posts saying "it's priced in" and telling retail profits at $250M. -> After $SIVE confirmed $JBL confirmed they were using them for their upcoming transceivers. -> After $SIVE are in O-Net supply chains. Then saying it's "Sentiment Driven" after one of the largest T1 optical suppliers now is a confirmed Sivers buyer. Again, this is currently majority retail owned, so it's my opinion institutions are trying to acquire positions off retail hands.