· 方法论
你们这些匿名者都意识到战争对股市是利好吧？ 经验法则是： 只要战争不在你的领土上，就是利好。 X 上的散户正在“恐慌性抛售，从 $NVDA 到 $HOOD 全卖，完蛋了”，紧随美国/以色列在伊朗强行政权更迭之后。 但机构大多已经抢跑，正如我们在实际事件发生前看到的大型国防+石油板块上涨（以及任何高贝塔资产的抛售）。 自二战以来，在约 73% 的武装冲突中，美国股市在侵略行为发生一年后都产生了正收益。 而且美国很可能通过此前接管委内瑞拉的石油储备，已经为任何石油波动做好了准备。 朝鲜战争（年化+18.7%）、二战（+16.9%）和海湾战争（+11.7%）期间的年化回报均高于和平时期平均水平。 2022 年 2 月 24 日俄罗斯入侵乌克兰后，标普 500 指数下跌超过 7%。 不久后市场反弹，标普指数交易水平高于入侵前，即使油价仍维持在每桶 100 美元以上。 伊朗和石油冲击对不同板块有不同影响，但总体而言大盘会上涨（短期下跌）。 总结：这显然是多方面的，不同冲突影响的板块程度不同。 但经验法则是：只要不在自家领土，战争就是利好。
You all do realize War is bullish for markets right anon? General rule of thumb is: As long as it’s not in your territory, War is bullish. There’s the retail on X “panic sell everything from $NVDA to $HOOD it’s over” following US/Israel forcing a regime change in Iran. But institutions have largely frontran it as seen with the rise of big defense + oil sectors (and selloff of anything high beta) leading up to the actual event. U.S. stocks generated positive performance one year after an act of aggression in roughly 73% of armed conflicts since WWII. And it’s likely the US already prepared for any Oil volatility by taking over Venezuela earlier for oil reserves. Annualized returns during the Korean War (+18.7%), WWII (+16.9%), and the Gulf War (+11.7%) all beat peacetime averages. After Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the S&P 500 index fell more than 7%. Shortly after, markets rebounded and the S&P was trading at a level higher than before the invasion, even as the price of oil remained elevated above $100 a barrel. There’s different implications on different sectors with Iran and Oil impacts, but generally markets as a whole go up (short term down). TLDR: It’s obviously multifaceted and more sectors are impacted than others depending on the conflict. But rule of thumb is War is bullish, as long as long as it’s not on your own territory.