中文翻译
世界*模型。显然,如果世界上最先进的世界模型需要多普勒级别的精度,与$OUST相比,$AEVA是少数能做到这一点的公司之一?如果你给Cosmos提供“概率性”深度数据(来自$OUST),模型必须消耗大量计算周期来计算物体的移动位置。$AEVA直接输入确定性速度数据。“如果模型必须从连续深度帧中推断运动,那比直接接收速度作为输入需要更多的计算。”
· 供应链分析
世界*模型。显然,如果世界上最先进的世界模型需要多普勒级别的精度,与$OUST相比,$AEVA是少数能做到这一点的公司之一?如果你给Cosmos提供“概率性”深度数据(来自$OUST),模型必须消耗大量计算周期来计算物体的移动位置。$AEVA直接输入确定性速度数据。“如果模型必须从连续深度帧中推断运动,那比直接接收速度作为输入需要更多的计算。”
World* models. Apparently if the world's most advanced World Models require Doppler-level precision, $AEVA is one of the only companies that can do it compared to companies to $OUST here? If you give Cosmos "probabilistic" depth data (from $OUST ) the model has to spend massive amounts of compute cycles calculating where things are moving. $AEVA just feeds in deterministic velocity data. “If a model has to infer motion from sequential depth frames, that’s additional computation versus receiving velocity as a direct input”