中文翻译
虽然有点开玩笑，但目前 $NBIS Avride 拥有比 $TSLA 更成熟的 L4 级系统架构（类似于 Waymo 采用激光雷达、摄像头、雷达的方案），且正在主要区域进行类似 Waymo 的地理围栏商业化部署。 $TSLA 的 L2 级系统需要人工监督（FSD 被高估了）。 然而，特斯拉的策略是通过 AI 软件改进，将纯视觉消费者车辆系统扩展至 L4+ 能力。$TSLA 还掌控全栈技术，因此能以极低成本大规模扩展且不受地理围栏限制。
· 个股论点
对比NBIS成熟L4架构与特斯拉纯视觉扩展策略优劣
英文原文
Obviously joking a bit but as of now $NBIS Avride has a more mature lvl-4 system architecture (similar to Waymo's approach with LiDAR, cameras, radar) than $TSLA, and is just launching commercially but geofenced in major areas like Waymo. $TSLA level-2 system is supervised and requires human drivers (FSD is overstated). However, Tesla's approach bets on scaling a vision-only consumer vehicle system to Level 4+ capability through AI software improvements. $TSLA also owns the stack so they can build out this to scale extremely cheaply + non geofenced.