$JOBY
相关推文
按时间倒序
-
批评热门博主为流量散布有害信息，倡导透明披露基本面与催化剂的研究方法。
周六吐槽，因为最热门的 X 账号为了追求互动量和订阅费，正在积极伤害散户。 那些在 X 上卖 10 美元课程的人，只为了互动量，随便挑像 $RGTI 这种零营收却涨了 4000% 的股票。 然后在 $JOBY、$OPEN、IONQ 等股票暴涨 1000%+ 后，再事后诸葛亮地加上它们，声称因为“X 的未来”所以是必持牛股。 这些内容毫无实质意义，只是有害信息。 如果人们盲目跟随并为此支付 10 美元，你的投资组合会被炸毁。 当我做股票列表时，我会透明地写下： 对股票催化剂或基本面变化的简要解释。 人们可以持不同意见，但这正是让讨论变得富有成效的原因。人们可以根据新信息做出自己的判断。 从实际交易者的角度来看，许多最热门的 X 账号完全是胡说八道。 看到新手盲目上当，不仅损失了自己的钱，还要支付订阅费，这让人心痛。
英文原文
Saturday Rant because the most popular X accounts are actively harming retail for engagement and subscriptions. The people who sell $10 courses on X just pick anything like $RGTI that went up 4000% off 0 revenue for engagement. Then add $JOBY, $OPEN, IONQ, etc. retroactively after a 1000%+ rise and that they're a top stock to own because "Future of X". There's nothing material and it's just harmful information. if people follow them blindly and pay $10 for this, your portfolio will get nuked. When I do stock lists, I write down transparently: A light explanation of catalysts or fundamental changes to a stock. People can disagree, but that's what makes discussions productive. People can make their own judgement from new information. So many of the most popular X accounts are just complete BS from an actual trader's perspective. It hurts to see newcomers blindly fall for this and end up losing their own money on top of paying for subscriptions too.
-
批评某博主推荐的中小盘股名单，指出其持仓逻辑荒谬且风险极高。
@RealJGBanks 抱歉，恕我直言这份名单糟透了，我完全无法认同。 如果 $RGTI、$OKLO、$JOBY、$OPEN、$IONQ 是你按板块划分的中小盘股首选持仓，那就祝你的粉丝组合被核爆吧。 如果有人在 $RGTI 零营收暴涨4000%之前发布这份名单，那倒还说得过去。
英文原文
@RealJGBanks Sorry but terrible list imo, couldn't disagree more. If $RGTI, $OKLO, $JOBY, $OPEN, $IONQ are your top choices of small-mid caps to own by sector, have fun nuking the portfolio of followers. If someone posted this list before $RGTI went up 4000% off 0 revenue, then sure.