中文翻译
是的，我原本期望大型期刊能有更好的表现，而不是编造评论。这相当于我说《金融时报》是一本无人重视的知名梗图期刊，因为他们的一位编辑曾去过游戏驿站(GameStop)。即便这样说，可能也比他们关于 $RPI 编造的评论更接近事实。
· 杂谈
批评大型期刊编造关于$RPI的虚假评论。
涉及标的： $RPI
英文原文
Yeah, I expected better from large journals instead of making up commentary. It’s the equivalent of me saying “Financial Times” is a well known meme journal nobody takes seriously because the one of their editors visited gamestop before. Even with that statement it’s probably more true than the commentary they made up about $RPI