· 供应链分析
是的，这是一个合理的观点，我在发帖前已经研究过了。 新的 Picoclaw/压缩变体使用的内存少于 10 MB，而且不在本地运行推理。 这就是为什么我上周五才注意到树莓派（Raspberry Pi）的角度，当时 Picoclaw 的帖子正在病毒式传播。 这里有几个细微差别。平台知道虚拟机（VM）并检测虚拟机监控程序指纹。裸机树莓派用于自动化以绕过检测，因为它们看起来只是 Arm 设备，这很可能是一个主要原因。 此外，据我所知，当你给予 Openclaw AI root shell 访问权限时，也存在可能的交叉污染。
Yep that's a fair point that i looked into before posting. New picoclaw/compressed variants use less than 10 mb of ram + doesnt run inference locally though. Hence why I only saw the raspberry pi angle last Friday when there were viral posts from picoclaw. So few nuances. Platforms know VMs and detect hypervisor fingerprinting. Baremetal pis for automation bypass detection since they just look like Arm devices, which is likely a big reason. There's also possible cross contamination when you give openclaw ai root shell access from what i've heard