中文翻译
我将 $SNAP 的 GCP 运营支出削减和内存货币化纳入自由现金流(FCF)模型，结合与 Perplexity 的交易，其未来看起来被低估。但向“人才”和高管发行数十亿美元的股票薪酬(SBC) -> 进一步增加债务（尤其是那5亿美元回购）-> 支付额外的债务利息，彻底破坏了该模型。这一切取决于 Evan 是否能显著降低 SBC。但在我看来，那5亿美元的回购是一个危险信号，而非利好。
· 个股论点
SNAP因高额SBC和债务问题破坏估值模型，回购被视为危险信号。
涉及标的： $SNAP
英文原文
I modeled $SNAP GCP opex cuts and memory monetization into FCF and it looked undervalued moving forward with the Perplexity deal. But issuing billions in SBC to "Talent" and executives -> going into further debt (especially the $500M buyback) -> paying additional debt interest blows that model apart. This is all in the hands of Evan to make that change if he lowers SBC notably. But the $500M buyback is a red flag to me instead of a positive thing to me.